Go Pro
→ SpaceX IPO hides a much bigger story (From Weiss Ratings) (Ad)tc pixel Free HIFS Stock Alerts

Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS) Competitors

Hingham Institution for Savings logo
$291.63 -3.51 (-1.19%)
Closing price 07/20/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$291.62 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 07/20/2026 07:34 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.
Compare

HIFS vs. CATY, NWBI, QCRH, THFF, and TOWN

Should you buy Hingham Institution for Savings stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Hingham Institution for Savings with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Hingham Institution for Savings include Cathay General Bancorp (CATY), Northwest Bancshares (NWBI), QCR (QCRH), First Financial Corporation Indiana (THFF), and Towne Bank (TOWN). These companies are all part of the "finance" sector.

How does Hingham Institution for Savings compare to Cathay General Bancorp?

Cathay General Bancorp (NASDAQ:CATY) and Hingham Institution for Savings (NASDAQ:HIFS) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Cathay General Bancorp has a beta of 0.86, meaning that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hingham Institution for Savings has a beta of 0.83, meaning that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

Cathay General Bancorp has higher revenue and earnings than Hingham Institution for Savings. Cathay General Bancorp is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hingham Institution for Savings, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cathay General Bancorp$1.38B3.00$315.12M$4.8512.78
Hingham Institution for Savings$236.78M2.68$54.55M$22.8112.79

In the previous week, Cathay General Bancorp and Cathay General Bancorp both had 4 articles in the media. Hingham Institution for Savings' average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat Cathay General Bancorp's score of 0.60 indicating that Hingham Institution for Savings is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Cathay General Bancorp
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Hingham Institution for Savings
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

75.0% of Cathay General Bancorp shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 49.3% of Hingham Institution for Savings shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.5% of Cathay General Bancorp shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Hingham Institution for Savings has a net margin of 25.94% compared to Cathay General Bancorp's net margin of 23.79%. Cathay General Bancorp's return on equity of 11.37% beat Hingham Institution for Savings' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cathay General Bancorp23.79% 11.37% 1.38%
Hingham Institution for Savings 25.94%8.43%0.88%

Cathay General Bancorp pays an annual dividend of $1.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Hingham Institution for Savings pays an annual dividend of $2.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Cathay General Bancorp pays out 31.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hingham Institution for Savings pays out 11.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Cathay General Bancorp currently has a consensus target price of $51.75, indicating a potential downside of 16.53%. Given Cathay General Bancorp's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Cathay General Bancorp is more favorable than Hingham Institution for Savings.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cathay General Bancorp
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Hingham Institution for Savings
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Cathay General Bancorp beats Hingham Institution for Savings on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hingham Institution for Savings compare to Northwest Bancshares?

Northwest Bancshares (NASDAQ:NWBI) and Hingham Institution for Savings (NASDAQ:HIFS) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation and dividends.

Northwest Bancshares has a beta of 0.68, suggesting that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hingham Institution for Savings has a beta of 0.83, suggesting that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Hingham Institution for Savings had 4 more articles in the media than Northwest Bancshares. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Hingham Institution for Savings and 0 mentions for Northwest Bancshares. Hingham Institution for Savings' average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat Northwest Bancshares' score of 0.00 indicating that Hingham Institution for Savings is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Northwest Bancshares Neutral
Hingham Institution for Savings Positive

66.3% of Northwest Bancshares shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 49.3% of Hingham Institution for Savings shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Northwest Bancshares shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Northwest Bancshares has higher revenue and earnings than Hingham Institution for Savings. Hingham Institution for Savings is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Northwest Bancshares, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Northwest Bancshares$878.94M2.57$126.01M$0.9316.58
Hingham Institution for Savings$236.78M2.68$54.55M$22.8112.79

Northwest Bancshares pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.2%. Hingham Institution for Savings pays an annual dividend of $2.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Northwest Bancshares pays out 86.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Hingham Institution for Savings pays out 11.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Hingham Institution for Savings has a net margin of 25.94% compared to Northwest Bancshares' net margin of 14.72%. Northwest Bancshares' return on equity of 9.79% beat Hingham Institution for Savings' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Northwest Bancshares14.72% 9.79% 1.11%
Hingham Institution for Savings 25.94%8.43%0.88%

Northwest Bancshares currently has a consensus target price of $14.80, suggesting a potential downside of 4.02%. Given Northwest Bancshares' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Northwest Bancshares is more favorable than Hingham Institution for Savings.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Northwest Bancshares
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Hingham Institution for Savings
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Northwest Bancshares beats Hingham Institution for Savings on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hingham Institution for Savings compare to QCR?

Hingham Institution for Savings (NASDAQ:HIFS) and QCR (NASDAQ:QCRH) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings and dividends.

Hingham Institution for Savings has a beta of 0.83, indicating that its share price is 17% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, QCR has a beta of 0.75, indicating that its share price is 25% less volatile than the broader market.

QCR has higher revenue and earnings than Hingham Institution for Savings. QCR is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hingham Institution for Savings, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hingham Institution for Savings$236.78M2.68$54.55M$22.8112.79
QCR$603.75M2.67$127.19M$7.9812.25

49.3% of Hingham Institution for Savings shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 70.0% of QCR shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.2% of QCR shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Hingham Institution for Savings has a net margin of 25.94% compared to QCR's net margin of 21.98%. QCR's return on equity of 12.54% beat Hingham Institution for Savings' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hingham Institution for Savings25.94% 8.43% 0.88%
QCR 21.98%12.54%1.44%

QCR has a consensus price target of $101.00, suggesting a potential upside of 3.32%. Given QCR's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe QCR is more favorable than Hingham Institution for Savings.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hingham Institution for Savings
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
QCR
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

In the previous week, Hingham Institution for Savings and Hingham Institution for Savings both had 4 articles in the media. Hingham Institution for Savings' average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat QCR's score of 0.41 indicating that Hingham Institution for Savings is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Hingham Institution for Savings
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
QCR
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Hingham Institution for Savings pays an annual dividend of $2.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. QCR pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Hingham Institution for Savings pays out 11.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. QCR pays out 5.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

QCR beats Hingham Institution for Savings on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hingham Institution for Savings compare to First Financial Corporation Indiana?

Hingham Institution for Savings (NASDAQ:HIFS) and First Financial Corporation Indiana (NASDAQ:THFF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk and earnings.

First Financial Corporation Indiana has higher revenue and earnings than Hingham Institution for Savings. First Financial Corporation Indiana is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hingham Institution for Savings, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hingham Institution for Savings$236.78M2.68$54.55M$22.8112.79
First Financial Corporation Indiana$347.56M2.61$79.21M$6.8011.23

First Financial Corporation Indiana has a consensus target price of $70.00, suggesting a potential downside of 8.34%. Given First Financial Corporation Indiana's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe First Financial Corporation Indiana is more favorable than Hingham Institution for Savings.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hingham Institution for Savings
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
First Financial Corporation Indiana
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

49.3% of Hingham Institution for Savings shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.7% of First Financial Corporation Indiana shares are held by institutional investors. 5.0% of First Financial Corporation Indiana shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Hingham Institution for Savings had 3 more articles in the media than First Financial Corporation Indiana. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Hingham Institution for Savings and 1 mentions for First Financial Corporation Indiana. First Financial Corporation Indiana's average media sentiment score of 1.67 beat Hingham Institution for Savings' score of 1.02 indicating that First Financial Corporation Indiana is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Hingham Institution for Savings
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
First Financial Corporation Indiana
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Hingham Institution for Savings has a beta of 0.83, suggesting that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, First Financial Corporation Indiana has a beta of 0.42, suggesting that its stock price is 58% less volatile than the broader market.

Hingham Institution for Savings has a net margin of 25.94% compared to First Financial Corporation Indiana's net margin of 22.82%. First Financial Corporation Indiana's return on equity of 12.81% beat Hingham Institution for Savings' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hingham Institution for Savings25.94% 8.43% 0.88%
First Financial Corporation Indiana 22.82%12.81%1.39%

Hingham Institution for Savings pays an annual dividend of $2.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. First Financial Corporation Indiana pays an annual dividend of $2.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Hingham Institution for Savings pays out 11.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. First Financial Corporation Indiana pays out 32.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. First Financial Corporation Indiana has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. First Financial Corporation Indiana is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

First Financial Corporation Indiana beats Hingham Institution for Savings on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hingham Institution for Savings compare to Towne Bank?

Hingham Institution for Savings (NASDAQ:HIFS) and Towne Bank (NASDAQ:TOWN) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, media sentiment, dividends, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Towne Bank has higher revenue and earnings than Hingham Institution for Savings. Hingham Institution for Savings is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Towne Bank, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hingham Institution for Savings$236.78M2.68$54.55M$22.8112.79
Towne Bank$1.12B2.57$169.53M$1.9818.39

Towne Bank has a consensus target price of $39.50, suggesting a potential upside of 8.49%. Given Towne Bank's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Towne Bank is more favorable than Hingham Institution for Savings.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hingham Institution for Savings
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Towne Bank
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

In the previous week, Hingham Institution for Savings and Hingham Institution for Savings both had 4 articles in the media. Hingham Institution for Savings' average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat Towne Bank's score of 0.39 indicating that Hingham Institution for Savings is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Hingham Institution for Savings
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Towne Bank
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Hingham Institution for Savings pays an annual dividend of $2.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Towne Bank pays an annual dividend of $1.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Hingham Institution for Savings pays out 11.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Towne Bank pays out 56.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Towne Bank has increased its dividend for 13 consecutive years. Towne Bank is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

49.3% of Hingham Institution for Savings shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 56.0% of Towne Bank shares are held by institutional investors. 8.1% of Towne Bank shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Hingham Institution for Savings has a beta of 0.83, indicating that its share price is 17% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Towne Bank has a beta of 0.69, indicating that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

Hingham Institution for Savings has a net margin of 25.94% compared to Towne Bank's net margin of 13.51%. Towne Bank's return on equity of 9.91% beat Hingham Institution for Savings' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hingham Institution for Savings25.94% 8.43% 0.88%
Towne Bank 13.51%9.91%1.24%

Summary

Towne Bank beats Hingham Institution for Savings on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Hingham Institution for Savings News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for HIFS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding HIFS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

HIFS vs. The Competition

Export
MetricHingham Institution for SavingsBANKS IndustryFinance SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$644.04M$1.22B$14.38B$12.28B
Dividend Yield0.85%2.48%5.67%9.39%
P/E Ratio9.7119.2520.5523.94
Price / Sales2.682.4944.4291.94
Price / Cash48.4225.1519.2447.25
Price / Book1.451.302.266.14
Net Income$54.55M$75.93M$1.14B$331.74M
7 Day Performance1.33%1.11%0.19%-1.81%
1 Month Performance2.45%4.11%1.38%-1.44%
1 Year Performance18.40%26.21%13.19%16.33%

Hingham Institution for Savings Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
HIFS
Hingham Institution for Savings
1.1728 of 5 stars		$291.63
-1.2%		N/A+19.7%$644.04M$236.78M9.7187
CATY
Cathay General Bancorp
2.9004 of 5 stars		$62.14
+1.2%		$51.75
-16.7%		+28.6%$4.17B$844.88M12.821,268
NWBI
Northwest Bancshares
3.4204 of 5 stars		$15.22
+0.7%		$14.80
-2.7%		+15.9%$2.23B$878.94M16.362,233
QCRH
QCR
3.0214 of 5 stars		$97.22
+1.2%		$101.00
+3.9%		+30.1%$1.61B$603.75M12.181,004
THFF
First Financial Corporation Indiana
3.1595 of 5 stars		$75.72
+1.1%		$70.00
-7.6%		+36.2%$900.31M$347.56M11.14880

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:HIFS) was last updated on 7/21/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your $29.97 book is free today
Why Some Traders Skip Stocks Entirely You don't need a big account to trade options. In fact, options ca...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
SPCX Warning - and Worst News for Stocks in 50 Years
Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are now predicting what could be the worst news for the U.S. stock market in ...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
CODE RED: AI Meltdown Imminent?
After correctly predicting the 2008 and 2020 stock market meltdowns, I believe this AI company is about to tri...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
Elon’s new "tollbooth"
The SpaceX IPO was valued at $1.75 trillion. But one analyst says fighting over those shares may be the wrong ...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Elon's new "super startup"
Adam O'Dell - the analyst who recommended Palantir before it became the top S&P 500 performer - has identified...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel