NASDAQ:HIFS

Hingham Institution for Savings Competitors

$285.00
-2.78 (-0.97 %)
(As of 04/9/2021 04:00 PM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$285.00
Now: $285.00
$287.00
50-Day Range
$241.33
MA: $272.26
$294.70
52-Week Range
$135.04
Now: $285.00
$296.97
Volume2,394 shs
Average Volume4,930 shs
Market Capitalization$607.91 million
P/E Ratio13.79
Dividend Yield0.65%
Beta0.86

Competitors

Hingham Institution for Savings (NASDAQ:HIFS) Vs. PBCT, NYCB, TFSL, MTG, RDN, and WD

Should you be buying HIFS stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "thrifts & mortgage finance" are considered alternatives and competitors to Hingham Institution for Savings, including People's United Financial (PBCT), New York Community Bancorp (NYCB), TFS Financial (TFSL), MGIC Investment (MTG), Radian Group (RDN), and Walker & Dunlop (WD).

People's United Financial (NASDAQ:PBCT) and Hingham Institution for Savings (NASDAQ:HIFS) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, valuation, risk, profitability and institutional ownership.

Volatility and Risk

People's United Financial has a beta of 1.26, indicating that its stock price is 26% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Hingham Institution for Savings has a beta of 0.86, indicating that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

People's United Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Hingham Institution for Savings pays an annual dividend of $1.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. People's United Financial pays out 51.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. People's United Financial has increased its dividend for 28 consecutive years and Hingham Institution for Savings has increased its dividend for 13 consecutive years. People's United Financial is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for People's United Financial and Hingham Institution for Savings, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
People's United Financial08102.11
Hingham Institution for Savings0000N/A

People's United Financial currently has a consensus target price of $14.6250, suggesting a potential downside of 18.70%. Given People's United Financial's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe People's United Financial is more favorable than Hingham Institution for Savings.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

71.6% of People's United Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.9% of Hingham Institution for Savings shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.2% of People's United Financial shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares People's United Financial and Hingham Institution for Savings' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
People's United Financial21.57%7.30%0.92%
Hingham Institution for Savings39.65%15.65%1.52%

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares People's United Financial and Hingham Institution for Savings' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
People's United Financial$2.31 billion3.32$520.40 million$1.3912.94
Hingham Institution for Savings$115.78 million5.25$38.93 millionN/AN/A

People's United Financial has higher revenue and earnings than Hingham Institution for Savings.

Summary

People's United Financial beats Hingham Institution for Savings on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

New York Community Bancorp (NYSE:NYCB) and Hingham Institution for Savings (NASDAQ:HIFS) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, valuation, risk, profitability and institutional ownership.

Volatility and Risk

New York Community Bancorp has a beta of 1.07, indicating that its stock price is 7% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Hingham Institution for Savings has a beta of 0.86, indicating that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

New York Community Bancorp pays an annual dividend of $0.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.4%. Hingham Institution for Savings pays an annual dividend of $1.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. New York Community Bancorp pays out 88.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. New York Community Bancorp has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Hingham Institution for Savings has increased its dividend for 13 consecutive years.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for New York Community Bancorp and Hingham Institution for Savings, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
New York Community Bancorp07502.42
Hingham Institution for Savings0000N/A

New York Community Bancorp currently has a consensus target price of $12.4583, suggesting a potential downside of 0.33%. Given New York Community Bancorp's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe New York Community Bancorp is more favorable than Hingham Institution for Savings.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

50.8% of New York Community Bancorp shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.9% of Hingham Institution for Savings shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.3% of New York Community Bancorp shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares New York Community Bancorp and Hingham Institution for Savings' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
New York Community Bancorp23.07%6.69%0.76%
Hingham Institution for Savings39.65%15.65%1.52%

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares New York Community Bancorp and Hingham Institution for Savings' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
New York Community Bancorp$1.89 billion3.08$395.04 million$0.7716.23
Hingham Institution for Savings$115.78 million5.25$38.93 millionN/AN/A

New York Community Bancorp has higher revenue and earnings than Hingham Institution for Savings.

Summary

New York Community Bancorp beats Hingham Institution for Savings on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

TFS Financial (NASDAQ:TFSL) and Hingham Institution for Savings (NASDAQ:HIFS) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, valuation, risk, profitability and institutional ownership.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for TFS Financial and Hingham Institution for Savings, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
TFS Financial0000N/A
Hingham Institution for Savings0000N/A

Volatility and Risk

TFS Financial has a beta of 0.47, indicating that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Hingham Institution for Savings has a beta of 0.86, indicating that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares TFS Financial and Hingham Institution for Savings' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TFS Financial$508.55 million11.28$83.32 million$0.3068.17
Hingham Institution for Savings$115.78 million5.25$38.93 millionN/AN/A

TFS Financial has higher revenue and earnings than Hingham Institution for Savings.

Dividends

TFS Financial pays an annual dividend of $1.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.5%. Hingham Institution for Savings pays an annual dividend of $1.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. TFS Financial pays out 373.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. TFS Financial has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Hingham Institution for Savings has increased its dividend for 13 consecutive years.

Profitability

This table compares TFS Financial and Hingham Institution for Savings' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
TFS Financial16.38%4.97%0.56%
Hingham Institution for Savings39.65%15.65%1.52%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

10.0% of TFS Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.9% of Hingham Institution for Savings shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.6% of TFS Financial shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Hingham Institution for Savings beats TFS Financial on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Hingham Institution for Savings (NASDAQ:HIFS) and MGIC Investment (NYSE:MTG) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, dividends and valuation.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Hingham Institution for Savings and MGIC Investment, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Hingham Institution for Savings0000N/A
MGIC Investment01602.86

MGIC Investment has a consensus price target of $13.2188, suggesting a potential downside of 7.69%. Given MGIC Investment's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe MGIC Investment is more favorable than Hingham Institution for Savings.

Volatility and Risk

Hingham Institution for Savings has a beta of 0.86, meaning that its share price is 14% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, MGIC Investment has a beta of 1.84, meaning that its share price is 84% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Hingham Institution for Savings and MGIC Investment's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hingham Institution for Savings$115.78 million5.25$38.93 millionN/AN/A
MGIC Investment$1.21 billion4.00$673.76 million$1.847.78

MGIC Investment has higher revenue and earnings than Hingham Institution for Savings.

Dividends

Hingham Institution for Savings pays an annual dividend of $1.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. MGIC Investment pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. MGIC Investment pays out 13.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hingham Institution for Savings has raised its dividend for 13 consecutive years and MGIC Investment has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Profitability

This table compares Hingham Institution for Savings and MGIC Investment's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Hingham Institution for Savings39.65%15.65%1.52%
MGIC Investment39.04%11.08%7.40%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

34.9% of Hingham Institution for Savings shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.9% of MGIC Investment shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of MGIC Investment shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

MGIC Investment beats Hingham Institution for Savings on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Hingham Institution for Savings (NASDAQ:HIFS) and Radian Group (NYSE:RDN) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, dividends and valuation.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Hingham Institution for Savings and Radian Group, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Hingham Institution for Savings0000N/A
Radian Group01602.86

Radian Group has a consensus price target of $23.80, suggesting a potential upside of 0.21%. Given Radian Group's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Radian Group is more favorable than Hingham Institution for Savings.

Volatility and Risk

Hingham Institution for Savings has a beta of 0.86, meaning that its share price is 14% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Radian Group has a beta of 1.58, meaning that its share price is 58% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Hingham Institution for Savings and Radian Group's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hingham Institution for Savings$115.78 million5.25$38.93 millionN/AN/A
Radian Group$1.53 billion2.98$672.31 million$3.217.40

Radian Group has higher revenue and earnings than Hingham Institution for Savings.

Dividends

Hingham Institution for Savings pays an annual dividend of $1.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Radian Group pays an annual dividend of $0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Radian Group pays out 15.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hingham Institution for Savings has raised its dividend for 13 consecutive years and Radian Group has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Profitability

This table compares Hingham Institution for Savings and Radian Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Hingham Institution for Savings39.65%15.65%1.52%
Radian Group27.92%9.49%5.27%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

34.9% of Hingham Institution for Savings shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.2% of Radian Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of Radian Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Radian Group beats Hingham Institution for Savings on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Hingham Institution for Savings (NASDAQ:HIFS) and Walker & Dunlop (NYSE:WD) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, dividends and valuation.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Hingham Institution for Savings and Walker & Dunlop, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Hingham Institution for Savings0000N/A
Walker & Dunlop01302.75

Walker & Dunlop has a consensus price target of $90.6667, suggesting a potential downside of 14.95%. Given Walker & Dunlop's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Walker & Dunlop is more favorable than Hingham Institution for Savings.

Volatility and Risk

Hingham Institution for Savings has a beta of 0.86, meaning that its share price is 14% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Walker & Dunlop has a beta of 1.27, meaning that its share price is 27% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Hingham Institution for Savings and Walker & Dunlop's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hingham Institution for Savings$115.78 million5.25$38.93 millionN/AN/A
Walker & Dunlop$817.22 million4.04$173.37 million$5.4519.56

Walker & Dunlop has higher revenue and earnings than Hingham Institution for Savings.

Dividends

Hingham Institution for Savings pays an annual dividend of $1.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Walker & Dunlop pays an annual dividend of $2.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Walker & Dunlop pays out 36.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hingham Institution for Savings has raised its dividend for 13 consecutive years and Walker & Dunlop has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Profitability

This table compares Hingham Institution for Savings and Walker & Dunlop's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Hingham Institution for Savings39.65%15.65%1.52%
Walker & Dunlop21.64%18.98%6.22%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

34.9% of Hingham Institution for Savings shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.1% of Walker & Dunlop shares are held by institutional investors. 9.7% of Walker & Dunlop shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Walker & Dunlop beats Hingham Institution for Savings on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.


Hingham Institution for Savings Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
People's United Financial logo
PBCT
People's United Financial
2.2$17.99-0.6%$7.67 billion$2.31 billion15.51Analyst Downgrade
Analyst Revision
New York Community Bancorp logo
NYCB
New York Community Bancorp
2.6$12.50-0.2%$5.81 billion$1.89 billion14.88Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
TFS Financial logo
TFSL
TFS Financial
0.9$20.45-0.4%$5.74 billion$508.55 million68.17
MGIC Investment logo
MTG
MGIC Investment
2.3$14.32-1.3%$4.85 billion$1.21 billion10.77
Radian Group logo
RDN
Radian Group
2.2$23.75-0.6%$4.55 billion$1.53 billion11.64
Walker & Dunlop logo
WD
Walker & Dunlop
2.1$106.61-0.0%$3.30 billion$817.22 million17.28Insider Selling
The Simply Good Foods logo
SMPL
The Simply Good Foods
1.6$31.33-1.4%$3.00 billion$816.64 million49.73Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
Unusual Options Activity
Analyst Revision
LendingTree logo
TREE
LendingTree
1.7$227.55-0.8%$2.99 billion$1.11 billion-75.10Analyst Report
Insider Selling
WSFS Financial logo
WSFS
WSFS Financial
1.6$50.68-1.1%$2.41 billion$709.20 million25.73Analyst Downgrade
WSFS Financial logo
WSFS
WSFS Financial
2.6$50.68-1.1%$2.41 billion$709.20 million25.73Analyst Downgrade
Washington Federal logo
WAFD
Washington Federal
1.8$31.09-0.8%$2.36 billion$708.22 million13.88
Northwest Bancshares logo
NWBI
Northwest Bancshares
1.6$14.55-1.0%$1.85 billion$516.79 million25.98
Capitol Federal Financial logo
CFFN
Capitol Federal Financial
1.9$13.23-0.1%$1.84 billion$324.58 million28.76
Provident Financial Services logo
PFS
Provident Financial Services
2.1$23.08-1.1%$1.80 billion$435.26 million18.92
OceanFirst Financial logo
OCFC
OceanFirst Financial
1.9$23.78-0.5%$1.42 billion$350.96 million25.03Analyst Downgrade
Brookline Bancorp logo
BRKL
Brookline Bancorp
1.9$15.22-0.7%$1.19 billion$377.42 million27.67
Berkshire Hills Bancorp logo
BHLB
Berkshire Hills Bancorp
2.0$22.49-0.7%$1.15 billion$593.52 million-2.16
Federal Agricultural Mortgage logo
AGM
Federal Agricultural Mortgage
1.1$100.26-0.0%$1.08 billion$666.03 million12.17
Dime Community Bancshares logo
DCOM
Dime Community Bancshares
2.3$32.40-1.4%$1.07 billion$250.44 million1.62Analyst Upgrade
Kearny Financial logo
KRNY
Kearny Financial
1.5$12.25-0.2%$1.03 billion$252.93 million22.69
Meridian Bancorp logo
EBSB
Meridian Bancorp
1.5$18.45-0.2%$967.11 million$279.42 million14.76Analyst Downgrade
Banc of California logo
BANC
Banc of California
2.0$18.55-2.3%$938.89 million$403.23 million-97.63
HomeStreet logo
HMST
HomeStreet
1.8$43.30-0.6%$931.47 million$352.04 million15.98Analyst Report
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. (Staten Island, NY) logo
NFBK
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. (Staten Island, NY)
1.9$16.10-0.6%$833.38 million$179.95 million22.68
TrustCo Bank Corp NY logo
TRST
TrustCo Bank Corp NY
2.0$7.53-0.5%$726.20 million$210.72 million13.69
Flushing Financial logo
FFIC
Flushing Financial
1.8$21.63-0.9%$669.54 million$288.43 million14.14
Waterstone Financial logo
WSBF
Waterstone Financial
1.5$20.85-0.6%$523.71 million$210.49 million11.09
Home Bancorp logo
HBCP
Home Bancorp
2.1$36.95-0.1%$321.72 million$116.62 million16.50News Coverage
Territorial Bancorp logo
TBNK
Territorial Bancorp
1.6$26.64-0.0%$253.45 million$83.40 million13.59
Ocwen Financial logo
OCN
Ocwen Financial
0.8$27.89-0.5%$242.31 million$1.12 billion107.48
ESSA Bancorp logo
ESSA
ESSA Bancorp
1.8$15.72-0.4%$170.11 million$77.33 million11.39News Coverage
BankFinancial logo
BFIN
BankFinancial
1.3$10.29-0.1%$151.60 million$71.58 million15.36News Coverage
First Financial Northwest logo
FFNW
First Financial Northwest
1.7$14.04-0.4%$135.57 million$63.76 million16.33
Provident Financial logo
PROV
Provident Financial
1.7$17.00-0.0%$126.51 million$46.98 million19.54
This page was last updated on 4/10/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.