Do analysts recommend CATY or HIFS?

Cathay General Bancorp currently has a consensus price target of $62.25, suggesting a potential upside of 0.61%. Given Cathay General Bancorp's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Cathay General Bancorp is more favorable than Hingham Institution for Savings. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Cathay General Bancorp 1 Sell rating(s) 4 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Hingham Institution for Savings 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Do analysts prefer NWBI or HIFS?

Northwest Bancshares presently has a consensus target price of $15.80, suggesting a potential upside of 3.00%. Given Northwest Bancshares' higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Northwest Bancshares is more favorable than Hingham Institution for Savings. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Northwest Bancshares 0 Sell rating(s) 4 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.33 Hingham Institution for Savings 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Do analysts recommend HIFS or ONB?

Old National Bancorp has a consensus price target of $29.36, suggesting a potential upside of 13.59%. Given Old National Bancorp's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Old National Bancorp is more favorable than Hingham Institution for Savings. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Hingham Institution for Savings 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Old National Bancorp 0 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 9 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.75

Does the media favor HIFS or ONB?

In the previous week, Old National Bancorp had 7 more articles in the media than Hingham Institution for Savings. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Old National Bancorp and 2 mentions for Hingham Institution for Savings. Old National Bancorp's average media sentiment score of 1.42 beat Hingham Institution for Savings' score of 1.09 indicating that Old National Bancorp is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Hingham Institution for Savings 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Old National Bancorp 7 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts recommend QCRH or HIFS?

QCR presently has a consensus price target of $108.75, suggesting a potential upside of 8.07%. Given QCR's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe QCR is more favorable than Hingham Institution for Savings. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score QCR 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 4 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.67 Hingham Institution for Savings 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Does the media favor QCRH or HIFS?

In the previous week, QCR had 4 more articles in the media than Hingham Institution for Savings. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for QCR and 2 mentions for Hingham Institution for Savings. QCR's average media sentiment score of 1.28 beat Hingham Institution for Savings' score of 1.09 indicating that QCR is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment QCR 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Hingham Institution for Savings 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate HIFS or THFF?

First Financial Corporation Indiana has a consensus target price of $88.00, indicating a potential upside of 11.06%. Given First Financial Corporation Indiana's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe First Financial Corporation Indiana is more favorable than Hingham Institution for Savings. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Hingham Institution for Savings 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 First Financial Corporation Indiana 0 Sell rating(s) 4 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.40

Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS) Competitors

$295.67 -2.50 (-0.84%)

As of 08/28/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Compare

HIFS vs. CATY, NWBI, ONB, QCRH, and THFF

Should you buy Hingham Institution for Savings stock or one of its competitors? Hingham Institution for Savings's main competitors and comparable companies include Cathay General Bancorp (CATY), Northwest Bancshares (NWBI), Old National Bancorp (ONB), QCR (QCRH), and First Financial Corporation Indiana (THFF). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "regional banks" industry.

How does Hingham Institution for Savings compare to Cathay General Bancorp?

Cathay General Bancorp (NASDAQ:CATY) and Hingham Institution for Savings (NASDAQ:HIFS) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, risk, valuation, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

Hingham Institution for Savings has a net margin of 25.94% compared to Cathay General Bancorp's net margin of 24.66%. Cathay General Bancorp's return on equity of 11.71% beat Hingham Institution for Savings' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cathay General Bancorp	24.66%	11.71%	1.43%
Hingham Institution for Savings	25.94%	8.22%	0.88%

Cathay General Bancorp pays an annual dividend of $1.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Hingham Institution for Savings pays an annual dividend of $2.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Cathay General Bancorp pays out 29.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hingham Institution for Savings pays out 8.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Cathay General Bancorp had 11 more articles in the media than Hingham Institution for Savings. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Cathay General Bancorp and 2 mentions for Hingham Institution for Savings. Cathay General Bancorp's average media sentiment score of 1.18 beat Hingham Institution for Savings' score of 1.09 indicating that Cathay General Bancorp is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Cathay General Bancorp	9 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Hingham Institution for Savings	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Cathay General Bancorp has a beta of 0.86, meaning that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hingham Institution for Savings has a beta of 0.84, meaning that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market.

Cathay General Bancorp currently has a consensus price target of $62.25, suggesting a potential upside of 0.61%. Given Cathay General Bancorp's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Cathay General Bancorp is more favorable than Hingham Institution for Savings.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Cathay General Bancorp	1 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Hingham Institution for Savings	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

75.0% of Cathay General Bancorp shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 49.3% of Hingham Institution for Savings shares are held by institutional investors. 4.5% of Cathay General Bancorp shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Cathay General Bancorp has higher revenue and earnings than Hingham Institution for Savings. Hingham Institution for Savings is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cathay General Bancorp, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cathay General Bancorp	$1.38B	2.98	$315.12M	$5.12	12.08
Hingham Institution for Savings	$236.78M	2.72	$54.55M	$30.02	9.85

Summary

Cathay General Bancorp beats Hingham Institution for Savings on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hingham Institution for Savings compare to Northwest Bancshares?

Northwest Bancshares (NASDAQ:NWBI) and Hingham Institution for Savings (NASDAQ:HIFS) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership and earnings.

Northwest Bancshares has a beta of 0.68, suggesting that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hingham Institution for Savings has a beta of 0.84, suggesting that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market.

66.3% of Northwest Bancshares shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 49.3% of Hingham Institution for Savings shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Northwest Bancshares shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Northwest Bancshares pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.2%. Hingham Institution for Savings pays an annual dividend of $2.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Northwest Bancshares pays out 77.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Hingham Institution for Savings pays out 8.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Northwest Bancshares has higher revenue and earnings than Hingham Institution for Savings. Hingham Institution for Savings is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Northwest Bancshares, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Northwest Bancshares	$878.94M	2.56	$126.01M	$1.03	14.89
Hingham Institution for Savings	$236.78M	2.72	$54.55M	$30.02	9.85

Northwest Bancshares presently has a consensus target price of $15.80, suggesting a potential upside of 3.00%. Given Northwest Bancshares' higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Northwest Bancshares is more favorable than Hingham Institution for Savings.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Northwest Bancshares	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
Hingham Institution for Savings	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Hingham Institution for Savings has a net margin of 25.94% compared to Northwest Bancshares' net margin of 16.26%. Northwest Bancshares' return on equity of 10.25% beat Hingham Institution for Savings' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Northwest Bancshares	16.26%	10.25%	1.15%
Hingham Institution for Savings	25.94%	8.22%	0.88%

In the previous week, Northwest Bancshares had 1 more articles in the media than Hingham Institution for Savings. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Northwest Bancshares and 2 mentions for Hingham Institution for Savings. Hingham Institution for Savings' average media sentiment score of 1.09 beat Northwest Bancshares' score of 0.63 indicating that Hingham Institution for Savings is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Northwest Bancshares	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Hingham Institution for Savings	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Northwest Bancshares beats Hingham Institution for Savings on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hingham Institution for Savings compare to Old National Bancorp?

Hingham Institution for Savings (NASDAQ:HIFS) and Old National Bancorp (NASDAQ:ONB) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, profitability and dividends.

Old National Bancorp has higher revenue and earnings than Hingham Institution for Savings. Hingham Institution for Savings is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Old National Bancorp, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Hingham Institution for Savings	$236.78M	2.72	$54.55M	$30.02	9.85
Old National Bancorp	$3.74B	2.65	$669.26M	$2.25	11.49

In the previous week, Old National Bancorp had 7 more articles in the media than Hingham Institution for Savings. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Old National Bancorp and 2 mentions for Hingham Institution for Savings. Old National Bancorp's average media sentiment score of 1.42 beat Hingham Institution for Savings' score of 1.09 indicating that Old National Bancorp is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Hingham Institution for Savings	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Old National Bancorp	7 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Old National Bancorp has a consensus price target of $29.36, suggesting a potential upside of 13.59%. Given Old National Bancorp's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Old National Bancorp is more favorable than Hingham Institution for Savings.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Hingham Institution for Savings	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Old National Bancorp	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

Hingham Institution for Savings has a net margin of 25.94% compared to Old National Bancorp's net margin of 21.60%. Old National Bancorp's return on equity of 11.80% beat Hingham Institution for Savings' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Hingham Institution for Savings	25.94%	8.22%	0.88%
Old National Bancorp	21.60%	11.80%	1.34%

Hingham Institution for Savings pays an annual dividend of $2.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Old National Bancorp pays an annual dividend of $0.58 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Hingham Institution for Savings pays out 8.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Old National Bancorp pays out 25.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Hingham Institution for Savings has a beta of 0.84, indicating that its share price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Old National Bancorp has a beta of 0.84, indicating that its share price is 16% less volatile than the broader market.

49.3% of Hingham Institution for Savings shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.7% of Old National Bancorp shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Old National Bancorp shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Old National Bancorp beats Hingham Institution for Savings on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hingham Institution for Savings compare to QCR?

QCR (NASDAQ:QCRH) and Hingham Institution for Savings (NASDAQ:HIFS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, risk, dividends, valuation, media sentiment and earnings.

QCR has higher revenue and earnings than Hingham Institution for Savings. Hingham Institution for Savings is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than QCR, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
QCR	$387.04M	4.26	$127.19M	$8.46	11.89
Hingham Institution for Savings	$236.78M	2.72	$54.55M	$30.02	9.85

QCR has a beta of 0.74, suggesting that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hingham Institution for Savings has a beta of 0.84, suggesting that its share price is 16% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, QCR had 4 more articles in the media than Hingham Institution for Savings. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for QCR and 2 mentions for Hingham Institution for Savings. QCR's average media sentiment score of 1.28 beat Hingham Institution for Savings' score of 1.09 indicating that QCR is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
QCR	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Hingham Institution for Savings	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

QCR presently has a consensus price target of $108.75, suggesting a potential upside of 8.07%. Given QCR's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe QCR is more favorable than Hingham Institution for Savings.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
QCR	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Hingham Institution for Savings	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Hingham Institution for Savings has a net margin of 25.94% compared to QCR's net margin of 22.86%. QCR's return on equity of 12.87% beat Hingham Institution for Savings' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
QCR	22.86%	12.87%	1.50%
Hingham Institution for Savings	25.94%	8.22%	0.88%

70.0% of QCR shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 49.3% of Hingham Institution for Savings shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.2% of QCR shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

QCR pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Hingham Institution for Savings pays an annual dividend of $2.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. QCR pays out 7.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hingham Institution for Savings pays out 8.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

QCR beats Hingham Institution for Savings on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hingham Institution for Savings compare to First Financial Corporation Indiana?

Hingham Institution for Savings (NASDAQ:HIFS) and First Financial Corporation Indiana (NASDAQ:THFF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations and risk.

First Financial Corporation Indiana has higher revenue and earnings than Hingham Institution for Savings. Hingham Institution for Savings is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than First Financial Corporation Indiana, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Hingham Institution for Savings	$236.78M	2.72	$54.55M	$30.02	9.85
First Financial Corporation Indiana	$347.56M	2.71	$79.21M	$7.14	11.10

In the previous week, First Financial Corporation Indiana had 10 more articles in the media than Hingham Institution for Savings. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for First Financial Corporation Indiana and 2 mentions for Hingham Institution for Savings. First Financial Corporation Indiana's average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Hingham Institution for Savings' score of 1.09 indicating that First Financial Corporation Indiana is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Hingham Institution for Savings	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
First Financial Corporation Indiana	6 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

First Financial Corporation Indiana has a consensus target price of $88.00, indicating a potential upside of 11.06%. Given First Financial Corporation Indiana's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe First Financial Corporation Indiana is more favorable than Hingham Institution for Savings.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Hingham Institution for Savings	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
First Financial Corporation Indiana	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40

Hingham Institution for Savings has a net margin of 25.94% compared to First Financial Corporation Indiana's net margin of 23.32%. First Financial Corporation Indiana's return on equity of 13.02% beat Hingham Institution for Savings' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Hingham Institution for Savings	25.94%	8.22%	0.88%
First Financial Corporation Indiana	23.32%	13.02%	1.43%

Hingham Institution for Savings has a beta of 0.84, meaning that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, First Financial Corporation Indiana has a beta of 0.42, meaning that its stock price is 58% less volatile than the broader market.

49.3% of Hingham Institution for Savings shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.7% of First Financial Corporation Indiana shares are held by institutional investors. 5.0% of First Financial Corporation Indiana shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Hingham Institution for Savings pays an annual dividend of $2.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. First Financial Corporation Indiana pays an annual dividend of $2.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Hingham Institution for Savings pays out 8.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. First Financial Corporation Indiana pays out 31.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. First Financial Corporation Indiana has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. First Financial Corporation Indiana is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

First Financial Corporation Indiana beats Hingham Institution for Savings on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Hingham Institution for Savings News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding HIFS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

HIFS vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Hingham Institution for Savings	Banks Industry	Finance Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$645.18M	$23.55B	$14.10B	$12.90B
Dividend Yield	0.85%	3.19%	5.89%	11.28%
P/E Ratio	9.85	27.38	26.74	25.45
Price / Sales	2.72	9.48	514.74	73.08
Price / Cash	48.51	16.04	38.32	53.00
Price / Book	1.27	1.36	2.19	6.14
Net Income	$54.55M	$2.58B	$1.31B	$348.86M
7 Day Performance	-0.59%	-0.04%	0.90%	-0.80%
1 Month Performance	4.48%	0.76%	2.48%	4.13%
1 Year Performance	4.06%	22.94%	10.76%	15.17%

Hingham Institution for Savings Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
HIFS Hingham Institution for Savings	1.9347 of 5 stars	$295.67 -0.8%	N/A	+4.1%	$645.18M	$236.78M	9.85	87	News Coverage Positive News
CATY Cathay General Bancorp	2.8492 of 5 stars	$61.63 -0.8%	$62.25 +1.0%	+24.0%	$4.11B	$1.38B	12.04	1,268	News Coverage Positive News
NWBI Northwest Bancshares	3.3647 of 5 stars	$15.31 -0.1%	$15.80 +3.2%	+21.3%	$2.24B	$878.94M	14.86	2,233	Analyst Forecast
ONB Old National Bancorp	4.5355 of 5 stars	$25.79 -0.2%	$29.36 +13.9%	+12.9%	$9.87B	$3.74B	11.46	4,971	Positive News
QCRH QCR	3.4652 of 5 stars	$100.57 -0.2%	$108.75 +8.1%	+28.4%	$1.65B	$603.75M	11.89	1,004	Positive News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:HIFS) was last updated on 8/30/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS) Competitors

HIFS vs. CATY, NWBI, ONB, QCRH, and THFF

How does Hingham Institution for Savings compare to Cathay General Bancorp?

Summary

How does Hingham Institution for Savings compare to Northwest Bancshares?

Summary

How does Hingham Institution for Savings compare to Old National Bancorp?

Summary

How does Hingham Institution for Savings compare to QCR?

Summary

How does Hingham Institution for Savings compare to First Financial Corporation Indiana?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

HIFS vs. The Competition

Hingham Institution for Savings Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS) Competitors

HIFS vs. CATY, NWBI, ONB, QCRH, and THFF

How does Hingham Institution for Savings compare to Cathay General Bancorp?

Is CATY or HIFS more profitable?

Is CATY or HIFS a better dividend stock?

Does the media prefer CATY or HIFS?

Which has more volatility and risk, CATY or HIFS?

Do analysts recommend CATY or HIFS?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of CATY or HIFS?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, CATY or HIFS?

Summary

How does Hingham Institution for Savings compare to Northwest Bancshares?

Which has more risk and volatility, NWBI or HIFS?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in NWBI or HIFS?

Is NWBI or HIFS a better dividend stock?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, NWBI or HIFS?

Do analysts prefer NWBI or HIFS?

Is NWBI or HIFS more profitable?

Does the media refer more to NWBI or HIFS?

Summary

How does Hingham Institution for Savings compare to Old National Bancorp?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, HIFS or ONB?

Does the media favor HIFS or ONB?

Do analysts recommend HIFS or ONB?

Is HIFS or ONB more profitable?

Is HIFS or ONB a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk and volatility, HIFS or ONB?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in HIFS or ONB?

Summary

How does Hingham Institution for Savings compare to QCR?

Which has better valuation and earnings, QCRH or HIFS?

Which has more volatility and risk, QCRH or HIFS?

Does the media favor QCRH or HIFS?

Do analysts recommend QCRH or HIFS?

Is QCRH or HIFS more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in QCRH or HIFS?

Is QCRH or HIFS a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Hingham Institution for Savings compare to First Financial Corporation Indiana?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, HIFS or THFF?

Does the media prefer HIFS or THFF?

Do analysts rate HIFS or THFF?

Is HIFS or THFF more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, HIFS or THFF?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of HIFS or THFF?

Is HIFS or THFF a better dividend stock?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

HIFS vs. The Competition

Hingham Institution for Savings Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools