Free Trial

Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS) Competitors

Hingham Institution for Savings logo
$265.08 +2.77 (+1.06%)
Closing price 05/14/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$265.08 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 04:09 AM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

HIFS vs. AUB, CATY, NWBI, ONB, and QCRH

Should you buy Hingham Institution for Savings stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Hingham Institution for Savings with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Hingham Institution for Savings include Atlantic Union Bankshares (AUB), Cathay General Bancorp (CATY), Northwest Bancshares (NWBI), Old National Bancorp (ONB), and QCR (QCRH). These companies are all part of the "finance" sector.

How does Hingham Institution for Savings compare to Atlantic Union Bankshares?

Atlantic Union Bankshares (NASDAQ:AUB) and Hingham Institution for Savings (NASDAQ:HIFS) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, valuation, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Atlantic Union Bankshares had 3 more articles in the media than Hingham Institution for Savings. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Atlantic Union Bankshares and 2 mentions for Hingham Institution for Savings. Hingham Institution for Savings' average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Atlantic Union Bankshares' score of 0.58 indicating that Hingham Institution for Savings is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Atlantic Union Bankshares
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Hingham Institution for Savings
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Atlantic Union Bankshares has higher revenue and earnings than Hingham Institution for Savings. Hingham Institution for Savings is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Atlantic Union Bankshares, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Atlantic Union Bankshares$1.53B3.46$209.13M$2.3615.62
Hingham Institution for Savings$236.78M2.44$54.55M$22.8111.62

Atlantic Union Bankshares pays an annual dividend of $1.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Hingham Institution for Savings pays an annual dividend of $2.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Atlantic Union Bankshares pays out 62.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hingham Institution for Savings pays out 11.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Atlantic Union Bankshares has increased its dividend for 14 consecutive years. Atlantic Union Bankshares is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Atlantic Union Bankshares presently has a consensus target price of $42.89, suggesting a potential upside of 16.34%. Given Atlantic Union Bankshares' higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Atlantic Union Bankshares is more favorable than Hingham Institution for Savings.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Atlantic Union Bankshares
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.56
Hingham Institution for Savings
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Hingham Institution for Savings has a net margin of 21.17% compared to Atlantic Union Bankshares' net margin of 15.53%. Atlantic Union Bankshares' return on equity of 8.50% beat Hingham Institution for Savings' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Atlantic Union Bankshares15.53% 8.50% 1.06%
Hingham Institution for Savings 21.17%8.06%0.81%

78.6% of Atlantic Union Bankshares shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 49.3% of Hingham Institution for Savings shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Atlantic Union Bankshares shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Atlantic Union Bankshares has a beta of 0.8, indicating that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hingham Institution for Savings has a beta of 0.85, indicating that its stock price is 15% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Atlantic Union Bankshares beats Hingham Institution for Savings on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hingham Institution for Savings compare to Cathay General Bancorp?

Hingham Institution for Savings (NASDAQ:HIFS) and Cathay General Bancorp (NASDAQ:CATY) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, valuation and risk.

Hingham Institution for Savings has a beta of 0.85, indicating that its stock price is 15% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cathay General Bancorp has a beta of 0.87, indicating that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Cathay General Bancorp had 1 more articles in the media than Hingham Institution for Savings. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Cathay General Bancorp and 2 mentions for Hingham Institution for Savings. Cathay General Bancorp's average media sentiment score of 1.46 beat Hingham Institution for Savings' score of 1.11 indicating that Cathay General Bancorp is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Hingham Institution for Savings
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Cathay General Bancorp
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

49.3% of Hingham Institution for Savings shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.0% of Cathay General Bancorp shares are held by institutional investors. 4.9% of Cathay General Bancorp shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Hingham Institution for Savings pays an annual dividend of $2.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Cathay General Bancorp pays an annual dividend of $1.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Hingham Institution for Savings pays out 11.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cathay General Bancorp pays out 31.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Cathay General Bancorp has a net margin of 23.79% compared to Hingham Institution for Savings' net margin of 21.17%. Cathay General Bancorp's return on equity of 11.37% beat Hingham Institution for Savings' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hingham Institution for Savings21.17% 8.06% 0.81%
Cathay General Bancorp 23.79%11.37%1.38%

Cathay General Bancorp has a consensus price target of $52.00, suggesting a potential downside of 7.59%. Given Cathay General Bancorp's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Cathay General Bancorp is more favorable than Hingham Institution for Savings.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hingham Institution for Savings
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Cathay General Bancorp
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.17

Cathay General Bancorp has higher revenue and earnings than Hingham Institution for Savings. Cathay General Bancorp is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hingham Institution for Savings, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hingham Institution for Savings$236.78M2.44$54.55M$22.8111.62
Cathay General Bancorp$1.38B2.72$315.12M$4.8511.60

Summary

Cathay General Bancorp beats Hingham Institution for Savings on 14 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hingham Institution for Savings compare to Northwest Bancshares?

Hingham Institution for Savings (NASDAQ:HIFS) and Northwest Bancshares (NASDAQ:NWBI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings and risk.

Hingham Institution for Savings has a beta of 0.85, suggesting that its stock price is 15% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Northwest Bancshares has a beta of 0.69, suggesting that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

Hingham Institution for Savings pays an annual dividend of $2.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Northwest Bancshares pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. Hingham Institution for Savings pays out 11.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Northwest Bancshares pays out 86.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Northwest Bancshares has higher revenue and earnings than Hingham Institution for Savings. Hingham Institution for Savings is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Northwest Bancshares, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hingham Institution for Savings$236.78M2.44$54.55M$22.8111.62
Northwest Bancshares$878.94M2.26$126.01M$0.9314.60

In the previous week, Hingham Institution for Savings had 1 more articles in the media than Northwest Bancshares. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Hingham Institution for Savings and 1 mentions for Northwest Bancshares. Northwest Bancshares' average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat Hingham Institution for Savings' score of 1.11 indicating that Northwest Bancshares is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Hingham Institution for Savings Positive
Northwest Bancshares Very Positive

49.3% of Hingham Institution for Savings shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 66.3% of Northwest Bancshares shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Northwest Bancshares shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Hingham Institution for Savings has a net margin of 21.17% compared to Northwest Bancshares' net margin of 14.72%. Northwest Bancshares' return on equity of 9.79% beat Hingham Institution for Savings' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hingham Institution for Savings21.17% 8.06% 0.81%
Northwest Bancshares 14.72%9.79%1.11%

Northwest Bancshares has a consensus price target of $14.80, suggesting a potential upside of 8.98%. Given Northwest Bancshares' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Northwest Bancshares is more favorable than Hingham Institution for Savings.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hingham Institution for Savings
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Northwest Bancshares
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Summary

Northwest Bancshares beats Hingham Institution for Savings on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hingham Institution for Savings compare to Old National Bancorp?

Old National Bancorp (NASDAQ:ONB) and Hingham Institution for Savings (NASDAQ:HIFS) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings and analyst recommendations.

83.7% of Old National Bancorp shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 49.3% of Hingham Institution for Savings shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Old National Bancorp shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Old National Bancorp has higher revenue and earnings than Hingham Institution for Savings. Hingham Institution for Savings is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Old National Bancorp, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Old National Bancorp$3.74B2.44$669.26M$1.9412.16
Hingham Institution for Savings$236.78M2.44$54.55M$22.8111.62

Hingham Institution for Savings has a net margin of 21.17% compared to Old National Bancorp's net margin of 18.90%. Old National Bancorp's return on equity of 11.23% beat Hingham Institution for Savings' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Old National Bancorp18.90% 11.23% 1.27%
Hingham Institution for Savings 21.17%8.06%0.81%

Old National Bancorp presently has a consensus price target of $27.91, suggesting a potential upside of 18.31%. Given Old National Bancorp's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Old National Bancorp is more favorable than Hingham Institution for Savings.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Old National Bancorp
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.73
Hingham Institution for Savings
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Old National Bancorp pays an annual dividend of $0.58 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Hingham Institution for Savings pays an annual dividend of $2.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Old National Bancorp pays out 29.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hingham Institution for Savings pays out 11.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Old National Bancorp has a beta of 0.85, suggesting that its stock price is 15% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hingham Institution for Savings has a beta of 0.85, suggesting that its stock price is 15% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Old National Bancorp had 4 more articles in the media than Hingham Institution for Savings. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Old National Bancorp and 2 mentions for Hingham Institution for Savings. Hingham Institution for Savings' average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Old National Bancorp's score of 0.79 indicating that Hingham Institution for Savings is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Old National Bancorp
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Hingham Institution for Savings
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Old National Bancorp beats Hingham Institution for Savings on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hingham Institution for Savings compare to QCR?

QCR (NASDAQ:QCRH) and Hingham Institution for Savings (NASDAQ:HIFS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, risk, dividends and analyst recommendations.

QCR has a net margin of 21.98% compared to Hingham Institution for Savings' net margin of 21.17%. QCR's return on equity of 12.54% beat Hingham Institution for Savings' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
QCR21.98% 12.54% 1.44%
Hingham Institution for Savings 21.17%8.06%0.81%

70.0% of QCR shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 49.3% of Hingham Institution for Savings shares are held by institutional investors. 3.2% of QCR shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

QCR has higher revenue and earnings than Hingham Institution for Savings. QCR is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hingham Institution for Savings, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
QCR$603.75M2.43$127.19M$7.9811.14
Hingham Institution for Savings$236.78M2.44$54.55M$22.8111.62

In the previous week, QCR had 1 more articles in the media than Hingham Institution for Savings. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for QCR and 2 mentions for Hingham Institution for Savings. Hingham Institution for Savings' average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat QCR's score of 0.91 indicating that Hingham Institution for Savings is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
QCR
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Hingham Institution for Savings
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

QCR currently has a consensus price target of $101.00, suggesting a potential upside of 13.66%. Given QCR's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe QCR is more favorable than Hingham Institution for Savings.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
QCR
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Hingham Institution for Savings
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

QCR pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Hingham Institution for Savings pays an annual dividend of $2.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. QCR pays out 5.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hingham Institution for Savings pays out 11.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

QCR has a beta of 0.77, suggesting that its share price is 23% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hingham Institution for Savings has a beta of 0.85, suggesting that its share price is 15% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

QCR beats Hingham Institution for Savings on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Hingham Institution for Savings News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for HIFS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding HIFS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

HIFS vs. The Competition

MetricHingham Institution for SavingsBANKS IndustryFinance SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$572.40M$1.07B$13.45B$12.37B
Dividend Yield0.96%2.73%5.84%5.35%
P/E Ratio11.6216.4423.1725.63
Price / Sales2.442.31180.8376.59
Price / Cash43.0423.5920.4556.33
Price / Book1.321.142.156.97
Net Income$54.55M$75.93M$1.11B$333.62M
7 Day Performance-6.53%-1.47%-0.69%1.09%
1 Month Performance-10.69%-0.12%0.23%3.08%
1 Year Performance-1.63%20.15%10.84%35.68%

Hingham Institution for Savings Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
HIFS
Hingham Institution for Savings
1.9667 of 5 stars
$265.08
+1.1%
N/A+1.1%$572.40M$236.78M11.6287
AUB
Atlantic Union Bankshares
4.9177 of 5 stars
$37.08
+0.2%
$42.89
+15.7%
+18.5%$5.31B$1.53B16.191,880
CATY
Cathay General Bancorp
2.3727 of 5 stars
$56.49
-1.0%
$52.00
-7.9%
+27.0%$3.82B$1.38B11.651,268
NWBI
Northwest Bancshares
4.6769 of 5 stars
$13.71
+0.1%
$14.80
+8.0%
+8.1%$2.00B$878.94M14.742,233
ONB
Old National Bancorp
4.4016 of 5 stars
$24.15
0.0%
$27.91
+15.6%
+4.5%$9.33B$3.74B12.454,971

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:HIFS) was last updated on 5/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners