Chicago Atlantic BDC (LIEN) Competitors

$9.86 +0.04 (+0.41%)

As of 04:00 PM Eastern

LIEN vs. BBDC, BCSF, CGBD, NMFC, and SLRC

Should you buy Chicago Atlantic BDC stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Chicago Atlantic BDC with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Chicago Atlantic BDC include Barings Bdc (BBDC), Bain Capital Specialty Finance (BCSF), Carlyle Secured Lending (CGBD), New Mountain Finance (NMFC), and SLR Investment (SLRC). These companies are all part of the "fin - sbic&commrl" industry.

How does Chicago Atlantic BDC compare to Barings Bdc?

Barings Bdc (NYSE:BBDC) and Chicago Atlantic BDC (NASDAQ:LIEN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and dividends.

In the previous week, Barings Bdc had 2 more articles in the media than Chicago Atlantic BDC. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Barings Bdc and 0 mentions for Chicago Atlantic BDC. Chicago Atlantic BDC's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Barings Bdc's score of 0.00 indicating that Chicago Atlantic BDC is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Barings Bdc	Neutral
Chicago Atlantic BDC	Positive

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a net margin of 57.88% compared to Barings Bdc's net margin of 32.45%. Chicago Atlantic BDC's return on equity of 11.67% beat Barings Bdc's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Barings Bdc	32.45%	10.08%	4.33%
Chicago Atlantic BDC	57.88%	11.67%	10.30%

Barings Bdc currently has a consensus target price of $9.50, indicating a potential upside of 11.69%. Given Barings Bdc's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Barings Bdc is more favorable than Chicago Atlantic BDC.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Barings Bdc	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25
Chicago Atlantic BDC	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	4.00

Barings Bdc pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.2%. Chicago Atlantic BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.8%. Barings Bdc pays out 122.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Chicago Atlantic BDC pays out 90.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Barings Bdc has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Chicago Atlantic BDC is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Barings Bdc has higher revenue and earnings than Chicago Atlantic BDC. Chicago Atlantic BDC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Barings Bdc, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Barings Bdc	$279.21M	3.19	$101.92M	$0.85	10.01
Chicago Atlantic BDC	$54.30M	4.14	$33.28M	$1.50	6.57

44.1% of Barings Bdc shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.4% of Chicago Atlantic BDC shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Barings Bdc shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 16.9% of Chicago Atlantic BDC shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Barings Bdc has a beta of 0.61, suggesting that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chicago Atlantic BDC has a beta of 0.25, suggesting that its stock price is 75% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Chicago Atlantic BDC beats Barings Bdc on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chicago Atlantic BDC compare to Bain Capital Specialty Finance?

Chicago Atlantic BDC (NASDAQ:LIEN) and Bain Capital Specialty Finance (NYSE:BCSF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment and earnings.

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a net margin of 57.88% compared to Bain Capital Specialty Finance's net margin of 27.00%. Chicago Atlantic BDC's return on equity of 11.67% beat Bain Capital Specialty Finance's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Chicago Atlantic BDC	57.88%	11.67%	10.30%
Bain Capital Specialty Finance	27.00%	10.44%	4.35%

Chicago Atlantic BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.8%. Bain Capital Specialty Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.7%. Chicago Atlantic BDC pays out 90.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Bain Capital Specialty Finance pays out 147.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Bain Capital Specialty Finance has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Chicago Atlantic BDC is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Bain Capital Specialty Finance has higher revenue and earnings than Chicago Atlantic BDC. Chicago Atlantic BDC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bain Capital Specialty Finance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Chicago Atlantic BDC	$54.30M	4.14	$33.28M	$1.50	6.57
Bain Capital Specialty Finance	$273.24M	3.14	$98.76M	$1.14	11.60

In the previous week, Bain Capital Specialty Finance had 1 more articles in the media than Chicago Atlantic BDC. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Bain Capital Specialty Finance and 0 mentions for Chicago Atlantic BDC. Chicago Atlantic BDC's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Bain Capital Specialty Finance's score of 0.00 indicating that Chicago Atlantic BDC is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Chicago Atlantic BDC	Positive
Bain Capital Specialty Finance	Neutral

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a beta of 0.25, meaning that its share price is 75% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bain Capital Specialty Finance has a beta of 0.59, meaning that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

Bain Capital Specialty Finance has a consensus target price of $14.00, indicating a potential upside of 5.85%. Given Bain Capital Specialty Finance's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Bain Capital Specialty Finance is more favorable than Chicago Atlantic BDC.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Chicago Atlantic BDC	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	4.00
Bain Capital Specialty Finance	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

4.4% of Chicago Atlantic BDC shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.9% of Chicago Atlantic BDC shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Bain Capital Specialty Finance shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Chicago Atlantic BDC beats Bain Capital Specialty Finance on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chicago Atlantic BDC compare to Carlyle Secured Lending?

Carlyle Secured Lending (NASDAQ:CGBD) and Chicago Atlantic BDC (NASDAQ:LIEN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, profitability, risk and analyst recommendations.

Carlyle Secured Lending has a beta of 0.66, indicating that its share price is 34% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chicago Atlantic BDC has a beta of 0.25, indicating that its share price is 75% less volatile than the broader market.

Carlyle Secured Lending pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 15.0%. Chicago Atlantic BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.8%. Carlyle Secured Lending pays out 225.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Chicago Atlantic BDC pays out 90.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

In the previous week, Carlyle Secured Lending had 1 more articles in the media than Chicago Atlantic BDC. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Carlyle Secured Lending and 0 mentions for Chicago Atlantic BDC. Chicago Atlantic BDC's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Carlyle Secured Lending's score of 0.80 indicating that Chicago Atlantic BDC is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Carlyle Secured Lending	Positive
Chicago Atlantic BDC	Positive

24.5% of Carlyle Secured Lending shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.4% of Chicago Atlantic BDC shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Carlyle Secured Lending shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 16.9% of Chicago Atlantic BDC shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Carlyle Secured Lending presently has a consensus target price of $12.50, indicating a potential upside of 16.87%. Given Carlyle Secured Lending's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Carlyle Secured Lending is more favorable than Chicago Atlantic BDC.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Carlyle Secured Lending	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.43
Chicago Atlantic BDC	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	4.00

Carlyle Secured Lending has higher revenue and earnings than Chicago Atlantic BDC. Chicago Atlantic BDC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Carlyle Secured Lending, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Carlyle Secured Lending	$255.57M	2.91	$69.97M	$0.71	15.06
Chicago Atlantic BDC	$54.30M	4.14	$33.28M	$1.50	6.57

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a net margin of 57.88% compared to Carlyle Secured Lending's net margin of 19.52%. Chicago Atlantic BDC's return on equity of 11.67% beat Carlyle Secured Lending's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Carlyle Secured Lending	19.52%	8.99%	4.01%
Chicago Atlantic BDC	57.88%	11.67%	10.30%

Summary

Chicago Atlantic BDC beats Carlyle Secured Lending on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chicago Atlantic BDC compare to New Mountain Finance?

Chicago Atlantic BDC (NASDAQ:LIEN) and New Mountain Finance (NASDAQ:NMFC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, risk, earnings and dividends.

Chicago Atlantic BDC has higher earnings, but lower revenue than New Mountain Finance. New Mountain Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chicago Atlantic BDC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Chicago Atlantic BDC	$54.30M	4.14	$33.28M	$1.50	6.57
New Mountain Finance	$327.08M	2.29	$16.49M	-$0.58	N/A

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a net margin of 57.88% compared to New Mountain Finance's net margin of -18.65%. Chicago Atlantic BDC's return on equity of 11.67% beat New Mountain Finance's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Chicago Atlantic BDC	57.88%	11.67%	10.30%
New Mountain Finance	-18.65%	11.14%	4.63%

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a beta of 0.25, suggesting that its share price is 75% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, New Mountain Finance has a beta of 0.57, suggesting that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

Chicago Atlantic BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.8%. New Mountain Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 16.1%. Chicago Atlantic BDC pays out 90.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. New Mountain Finance pays out -220.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. New Mountain Finance is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, New Mountain Finance had 5 more articles in the media than Chicago Atlantic BDC. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for New Mountain Finance and 0 mentions for Chicago Atlantic BDC. Chicago Atlantic BDC's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat New Mountain Finance's score of 0.42 indicating that Chicago Atlantic BDC is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Chicago Atlantic BDC	Positive
New Mountain Finance	Neutral

New Mountain Finance has a consensus target price of $9.25, indicating a potential upside of 16.57%. Given New Mountain Finance's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe New Mountain Finance is more favorable than Chicago Atlantic BDC.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Chicago Atlantic BDC	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	4.00
New Mountain Finance	2 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.71

4.4% of Chicago Atlantic BDC shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.1% of New Mountain Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.9% of Chicago Atlantic BDC shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 14.9% of New Mountain Finance shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Chicago Atlantic BDC beats New Mountain Finance on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chicago Atlantic BDC compare to SLR Investment?

SLR Investment (NASDAQ:SLRC) and Chicago Atlantic BDC (NASDAQ:LIEN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership and risk.

SLR Investment has higher revenue and earnings than Chicago Atlantic BDC. Chicago Atlantic BDC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SLR Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
SLR Investment	$101.13M	7.01	$92.54M	$1.64	7.92
Chicago Atlantic BDC	$54.30M	4.14	$33.28M	$1.50	6.57

35.3% of SLR Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.4% of Chicago Atlantic BDC shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.8% of SLR Investment shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 16.9% of Chicago Atlantic BDC shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

SLR Investment presently has a consensus price target of $14.40, suggesting a potential upside of 10.90%. Given SLR Investment's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe SLR Investment is more favorable than Chicago Atlantic BDC.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
SLR Investment	3 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.86
Chicago Atlantic BDC	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	4.00

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a net margin of 57.88% compared to SLR Investment's net margin of 41.81%. Chicago Atlantic BDC's return on equity of 11.67% beat SLR Investment's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
SLR Investment	41.81%	8.33%	3.25%
Chicago Atlantic BDC	57.88%	11.67%	10.30%

SLR Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.5%. Chicago Atlantic BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.8%. SLR Investment pays out 75.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Chicago Atlantic BDC pays out 90.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

In the previous week, SLR Investment had 2 more articles in the media than Chicago Atlantic BDC. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for SLR Investment and 0 mentions for Chicago Atlantic BDC. SLR Investment's average media sentiment score of 1.80 beat Chicago Atlantic BDC's score of 1.00 indicating that SLR Investment is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
SLR Investment	Very Positive
Chicago Atlantic BDC	Positive

SLR Investment has a beta of 0.71, indicating that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chicago Atlantic BDC has a beta of 0.25, indicating that its share price is 75% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

SLR Investment beats Chicago Atlantic BDC on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Chicago Atlantic BDC News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding LIEN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

LIEN vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Chicago Atlantic BDC	FIN Industry	Finance Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$225.01M	$1.29B	$13.58B	$12.30B
Dividend Yield	13.86%	13.26%	5.84%	5.33%
P/E Ratio	6.57	10.87	23.92	25.64
Price / Sales	4.14	18.68	150.31	98.62
Price / Cash	7.22	7.08	20.09	56.16
Price / Book	0.74	0.81	2.14	7.03
Net Income	$33.28M	$121.13M	$1.13B	$335.38M
7 Day Performance	1.65%	-2.48%	0.80%	2.62%
1 Month Performance	3.79%	-6.08%	-0.26%	1.37%
1 Year Performance	-4.73%	-20.57%	11.84%	35.43%

Chicago Atlantic BDC Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
LIEN Chicago Atlantic BDC	1.4105 of 5 stars	$9.86 +0.4%	N/A	-5.8%	$225.01M	$54.30M	6.57	N/A	Positive News
BBDC Barings Bdc	2.3483 of 5 stars	$8.51 -1.1%	$9.67 +13.7%	-5.5%	$891.50M	$279.21M	10.02	26
BCSF Bain Capital Specialty Finance	2.0367 of 5 stars	$13.17 -1.4%	$14.00 +6.3%	-13.4%	$854.66M	$273.24M	11.56	1,000
CGBD Carlyle Secured Lending	3.9989 of 5 stars	$10.98 -2.0%	$12.50 +13.9%	-21.9%	$763.11M	$255.57M	15.47	N/A
NMFC New Mountain Finance	3.6782 of 5 stars	$7.98 -1.4%	$9.25 +16.0%	-24.3%	$754.18M	$327.08M	N/A	N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:LIEN) was last updated on 5/22/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Chicago Atlantic BDC (LIEN) Competitors

LIEN vs. BBDC, BCSF, CGBD, NMFC, and SLRC

How does Chicago Atlantic BDC compare to Barings Bdc?

Summary

How does Chicago Atlantic BDC compare to Bain Capital Specialty Finance?

Summary

How does Chicago Atlantic BDC compare to Carlyle Secured Lending?

Summary

How does Chicago Atlantic BDC compare to New Mountain Finance?

Summary

How does Chicago Atlantic BDC compare to SLR Investment?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

LIEN vs. The Competition

Chicago Atlantic BDC Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Chicago Atlantic BDC (LIEN) Competitors

LIEN vs. BBDC, BCSF, CGBD, NMFC, and SLRC

How does Chicago Atlantic BDC compare to Barings Bdc?

Does the media favor BBDC or LIEN?

Is BBDC or LIEN more profitable?

Do analysts prefer BBDC or LIEN?

Is BBDC or LIEN a better dividend stock?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, BBDC or LIEN?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of BBDC or LIEN?

Which has more risk and volatility, BBDC or LIEN?

Summary

How does Chicago Atlantic BDC compare to Bain Capital Specialty Finance?

Is LIEN or BCSF more profitable?

Is LIEN or BCSF a better dividend stock?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, LIEN or BCSF?

Does the media prefer LIEN or BCSF?

Which has more volatility & risk, LIEN or BCSF?

Do analysts rate LIEN or BCSF?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in LIEN or BCSF?

Summary

How does Chicago Atlantic BDC compare to Carlyle Secured Lending?

Which has more risk & volatility, CGBD or LIEN?

Is CGBD or LIEN a better dividend stock?

Does the media prefer CGBD or LIEN?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in CGBD or LIEN?

Do analysts recommend CGBD or LIEN?

Which has better valuation & earnings, CGBD or LIEN?

Is CGBD or LIEN more profitable?

Summary

How does Chicago Atlantic BDC compare to New Mountain Finance?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, LIEN or NMFC?

Is LIEN or NMFC more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, LIEN or NMFC?

Is LIEN or NMFC a better dividend stock?

Does the media prefer LIEN or NMFC?

Do analysts rate LIEN or NMFC?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in LIEN or NMFC?

Summary

How does Chicago Atlantic BDC compare to SLR Investment?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, SLRC or LIEN?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in SLRC or LIEN?

Do analysts rate SLRC or LIEN?

Is SLRC or LIEN more profitable?

Is SLRC or LIEN a better dividend stock?

Does the media favor SLRC or LIEN?

Which has more risk and volatility, SLRC or LIEN?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

LIEN vs. The Competition

Chicago Atlantic BDC Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools