Go Pro

Chicago Atlantic BDC (LIEN) Competitors

Chicago Atlantic BDC logo
$10.27 -0.07 (-0.68%)
As of 04:00 PM Eastern

LIEN vs. KBDC, OXLC, MFIC, BTGO, and CSHR

Should you buy Chicago Atlantic BDC stock or one of its competitors? Chicago Atlantic BDC's main competitors and comparable companies include Kayne Anderson BDC (KBDC), Oxford Lane Capital (OXLC), MidCap Financial Investment (MFIC), BTGO (BTGO), and CoinShares (CSHR). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Chicago Atlantic BDC compare to Kayne Anderson BDC?

Chicago Atlantic BDC (NASDAQ:LIEN) and Kayne Anderson BDC (NYSE:KBDC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, earnings, valuation and media sentiment.

Kayne Anderson BDC has higher revenue and earnings than Chicago Atlantic BDC. Chicago Atlantic BDC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kayne Anderson BDC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chicago Atlantic BDC$54.30M4.32$33.28M$1.397.39
Kayne Anderson BDC$235.82M3.78$93.71M$1.0912.39

Chicago Atlantic BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.2%. Kayne Anderson BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.8%. Chicago Atlantic BDC pays out 97.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Kayne Anderson BDC pays out 146.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Chicago Atlantic BDC is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Chicago Atlantic BDC had 7 more articles in the media than Kayne Anderson BDC. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Chicago Atlantic BDC and 4 mentions for Kayne Anderson BDC. Chicago Atlantic BDC's average media sentiment score of 1.56 beat Kayne Anderson BDC's score of 0.53 indicating that Chicago Atlantic BDC is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Chicago Atlantic BDC
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Kayne Anderson BDC
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a net margin of 52.82% compared to Kayne Anderson BDC's net margin of 31.54%. Chicago Atlantic BDC's return on equity of 11.66% beat Kayne Anderson BDC's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Chicago Atlantic BDC52.82% 11.66% 10.21%
Kayne Anderson BDC 31.54%10.63%5.06%

Kayne Anderson BDC has a consensus target price of $14.50, indicating a potential upside of 7.33%. Given Kayne Anderson BDC's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Kayne Anderson BDC is more favorable than Chicago Atlantic BDC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Chicago Atlantic BDC
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Kayne Anderson BDC
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.20

4.4% of Chicago Atlantic BDC shares are held by institutional investors. 12.9% of Chicago Atlantic BDC shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Kayne Anderson BDC shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a beta of 0.3, indicating that its stock price is 70% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kayne Anderson BDC has a beta of 0.31, indicating that its stock price is 69% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Chicago Atlantic BDC beats Kayne Anderson BDC on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chicago Atlantic BDC compare to Oxford Lane Capital?

Oxford Lane Capital (NASDAQ:OXLC) and Chicago Atlantic BDC (NASDAQ:LIEN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, valuation, profitability and institutional ownership.

Oxford Lane Capital has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Chicago Atlantic BDC. Oxford Lane Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chicago Atlantic BDC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Oxford Lane Capital-$580.18M-1.50$629.02M$6.941.38
Chicago Atlantic BDC$54.30M4.32$33.28M$1.397.39

Oxford Lane Capital pays an annual dividend of $3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 37.5%. Chicago Atlantic BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.2%. Oxford Lane Capital pays out 51.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Chicago Atlantic BDC pays out 97.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Oxford Lane Capital is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Oxford Lane Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Chicago Atlantic BDC
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

In the previous week, Chicago Atlantic BDC had 10 more articles in the media than Oxford Lane Capital. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Chicago Atlantic BDC and 1 mentions for Oxford Lane Capital. Oxford Lane Capital's average media sentiment score of 1.85 beat Chicago Atlantic BDC's score of 1.56 indicating that Oxford Lane Capital is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Oxford Lane Capital
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Chicago Atlantic BDC
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a net margin of 52.82% compared to Oxford Lane Capital's net margin of 0.00%. Chicago Atlantic BDC's return on equity of 11.66% beat Oxford Lane Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Oxford Lane CapitalN/A N/A N/A
Chicago Atlantic BDC 52.82%11.66%10.21%

6.7% of Oxford Lane Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.4% of Chicago Atlantic BDC shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.2% of Oxford Lane Capital shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 12.9% of Chicago Atlantic BDC shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Oxford Lane Capital has a beta of 0.63, meaning that its share price is 37% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chicago Atlantic BDC has a beta of 0.3, meaning that its share price is 70% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Chicago Atlantic BDC beats Oxford Lane Capital on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chicago Atlantic BDC compare to MidCap Financial Investment?

MidCap Financial Investment (NASDAQ:MFIC) and Chicago Atlantic BDC (NASDAQ:LIEN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, earnings, profitability, risk and institutional ownership.

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a net margin of 52.82% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of -9.85%. Chicago Atlantic BDC's return on equity of 11.66% beat MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
MidCap Financial Investment-9.85% 11.17% 4.41%
Chicago Atlantic BDC 52.82%11.66%10.21%

MidCap Financial Investment presently has a consensus price target of $11.11, suggesting a potential upside of 14.98%. Given MidCap Financial Investment's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe MidCap Financial Investment is more favorable than Chicago Atlantic BDC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
MidCap Financial Investment
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.11
Chicago Atlantic BDC
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

MidCap Financial Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.8%. Chicago Atlantic BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.2%. MidCap Financial Investment pays out -344.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Chicago Atlantic BDC pays out 97.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

MidCap Financial Investment has higher revenue and earnings than Chicago Atlantic BDC. MidCap Financial Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chicago Atlantic BDC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MidCap Financial Investment$320.88M2.48$63.17M-$0.36N/A
Chicago Atlantic BDC$54.30M4.32$33.28M$1.397.39

In the previous week, Chicago Atlantic BDC had 7 more articles in the media than MidCap Financial Investment. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Chicago Atlantic BDC and 4 mentions for MidCap Financial Investment. Chicago Atlantic BDC's average media sentiment score of 1.56 beat MidCap Financial Investment's score of 0.98 indicating that Chicago Atlantic BDC is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
MidCap Financial Investment
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Chicago Atlantic BDC
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

28.5% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.4% of Chicago Atlantic BDC shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 12.9% of Chicago Atlantic BDC shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.61, meaning that its share price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chicago Atlantic BDC has a beta of 0.3, meaning that its share price is 70% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Chicago Atlantic BDC beats MidCap Financial Investment on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chicago Atlantic BDC compare to BTGO?

Chicago Atlantic BDC (NASDAQ:LIEN) and BTGO (NYSE:BTGO) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership, risk and profitability.

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a net margin of 52.82% compared to BTGO's net margin of 0.00%. Chicago Atlantic BDC's return on equity of 11.66% beat BTGO's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Chicago Atlantic BDC52.82% 11.66% 10.21%
BTGO N/A N/A N/A

4.4% of Chicago Atlantic BDC shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.9% of Chicago Atlantic BDC shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Chicago Atlantic BDC had 6 more articles in the media than BTGO. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Chicago Atlantic BDC and 5 mentions for BTGO. Chicago Atlantic BDC's average media sentiment score of 1.56 beat BTGO's score of 0.38 indicating that Chicago Atlantic BDC is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Chicago Atlantic BDC
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
BTGO
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Chicago Atlantic BDC has higher earnings, but lower revenue than BTGO. BTGO is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chicago Atlantic BDC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chicago Atlantic BDC$54.30M4.32$33.28M$1.397.39
BTGO$16.15B0.05-$14.78M-$1.45N/A

BTGO has a consensus target price of $12.77, indicating a potential upside of 84.58%. Given BTGO's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe BTGO is more favorable than Chicago Atlantic BDC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Chicago Atlantic BDC
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
BTGO
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.73

Summary

Chicago Atlantic BDC beats BTGO on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chicago Atlantic BDC compare to CoinShares?

CoinShares (NASDAQ:CSHR) and Chicago Atlantic BDC (NASDAQ:LIEN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership and dividends.

Chicago Atlantic BDC has lower revenue, but higher earnings than CoinShares. Chicago Atlantic BDC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CoinShares, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CoinShares$165.68M4.52$5.54M$0.1831.56
Chicago Atlantic BDC$54.30M4.32$33.28M$1.397.39

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a net margin of 52.82% compared to CoinShares' net margin of 0.00%. Chicago Atlantic BDC's return on equity of 11.66% beat CoinShares' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CoinSharesN/A -100.73% 2.40%
Chicago Atlantic BDC 52.82%11.66%10.21%

CoinShares currently has a consensus price target of $7.00, suggesting a potential upside of 23.24%. Given CoinShares' higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe CoinShares is more favorable than Chicago Atlantic BDC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CoinShares
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Chicago Atlantic BDC
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

4.4% of Chicago Atlantic BDC shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.9% of Chicago Atlantic BDC shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Chicago Atlantic BDC had 11 more articles in the media than CoinShares. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Chicago Atlantic BDC and 0 mentions for CoinShares. CoinShares' average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Chicago Atlantic BDC's score of 1.56 indicating that CoinShares is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
CoinShares Very Positive
Chicago Atlantic BDC Very Positive

CoinShares has a beta of -1.52, meaning that its share price is 252% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chicago Atlantic BDC has a beta of 0.3, meaning that its share price is 70% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Chicago Atlantic BDC beats CoinShares on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Chicago Atlantic BDC News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for LIEN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding LIEN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

LIEN vs. The Competition

MetricChicago Atlantic BDCCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$235.96M$5.66B$14.01B$12.83B
Dividend Yield13.15%7.36%5.88%11.78%
P/E Ratio7.3931.6226.0724.97
Price / Sales4.321,230.00516.2391.96
Price / Cash7.6148.1638.4652.85
Price / Book0.771.962.096.03
Net Income$33.28M$418.14M$1.32B$348.89M
7 Day Performance0.79%-0.74%-0.90%-2.42%
1 Month Performance11.15%1.76%1.84%2.94%
1 Year Performance-6.72%4.98%9.97%13.69%

Chicago Atlantic BDC Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
LIEN
Chicago Atlantic BDC
3.1197 of 5 stars
$10.27
-0.7%
N/A-6.1%$235.96M$54.30M7.39N/A
KBDC
Kayne Anderson BDC
3.2743 of 5 stars
$13.48
+0.9%
$14.88
+10.4%
-10.2%$889.86M$84.89M12.36N/A
OXLC
Oxford Lane Capital
1.5642 of 5 stars
$9.53
+2.7%
N/A-48.2%$863.77M-$580.18M1.37601
MFIC
MidCap Financial Investment
3.2026 of 5 stars
$9.72
-0.4%
$11.11
+14.3%
-25.8%$800.64M$320.88MN/AN/A
BTGO
BTGO
3.8281 of 5 stars
$6.77
-1.0%
$12.77
+88.6%
N/A$796.17M$16.15BN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:LIEN) was last updated on 9/1/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners