Free Trial

Chicago Atlantic BDC (LIEN) Competitors

Chicago Atlantic BDC logo
$9.15 -0.12 (-1.29%)
Closing price 10/12/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$9.30 +0.15 (+1.68%)
As of 10/12/2026 07:30 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

LIEN vs. RPC, BTGO, KBDC, PAX, and CGBD

Should you buy Chicago Atlantic BDC stock or one of its competitors? Chicago Atlantic BDC's main competitors and comparable companies include Ridgepost Capital (RPC), BTGO (BTGO), Kayne Anderson BDC (KBDC), Patria Investments (PAX), and Carlyle Secured Lending (CGBD). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Chicago Atlantic BDC compare to Ridgepost Capital?

Ridgepost Capital (NYSE:RPC) and Chicago Atlantic BDC (NASDAQ:LIEN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation and earnings.

Ridgepost Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Chicago Atlantic BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.9%. Ridgepost Capital pays out 64.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Chicago Atlantic BDC pays out 97.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Ridgepost Capital has a beta of 0.89, indicating that its share price is 11% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chicago Atlantic BDC has a beta of 0.3, indicating that its share price is 70% less volatile than the broader market.

Chicago Atlantic BDC has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Ridgepost Capital. Chicago Atlantic BDC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ridgepost Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ridgepost Capital$297.35M3.04$19.50M$0.2532.83
Chicago Atlantic BDC$54.30M3.85$33.28M$1.396.58

Ridgepost Capital currently has a consensus target price of $13.00, suggesting a potential upside of 58.40%. Given Ridgepost Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Ridgepost Capital is more favorable than Chicago Atlantic BDC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ridgepost Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Chicago Atlantic BDC
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

In the previous week, Ridgepost Capital and Ridgepost Capital both had 1 articles in the media. Chicago Atlantic BDC's average media sentiment score of 1.82 beat Ridgepost Capital's score of 0.61 indicating that Chicago Atlantic BDC is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ridgepost Capital Positive
Chicago Atlantic BDC Very Positive

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a net margin of 52.82% compared to Ridgepost Capital's net margin of 9.03%. Ridgepost Capital's return on equity of 21.02% beat Chicago Atlantic BDC's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ridgepost Capital9.03% 21.02% 9.21%
Chicago Atlantic BDC 52.82%11.66%10.21%

48.1% of Ridgepost Capital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.4% of Chicago Atlantic BDC shares are held by institutional investors. 11.8% of Ridgepost Capital shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 12.9% of Chicago Atlantic BDC shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Ridgepost Capital beats Chicago Atlantic BDC on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chicago Atlantic BDC compare to BTGO?

BTGO (NYSE:BTGO) and Chicago Atlantic BDC (NASDAQ:LIEN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations and dividends.

4.4% of Chicago Atlantic BDC shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.9% of Chicago Atlantic BDC shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, BTGO had 3 more articles in the media than Chicago Atlantic BDC. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for BTGO and 1 mentions for Chicago Atlantic BDC. Chicago Atlantic BDC's average media sentiment score of 1.82 beat BTGO's score of 0.16 indicating that Chicago Atlantic BDC is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
BTGO Neutral
Chicago Atlantic BDC Very Positive

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a net margin of 52.82% compared to BTGO's net margin of 0.00%. Chicago Atlantic BDC's return on equity of 11.66% beat BTGO's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
BTGON/A N/A N/A
Chicago Atlantic BDC 52.82%11.66%10.21%

Chicago Atlantic BDC has lower revenue, but higher earnings than BTGO. BTGO is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chicago Atlantic BDC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BTGO$16.15B0.05-$14.78M-$1.45N/A
Chicago Atlantic BDC$54.30M3.85$33.28M$1.396.58

BTGO presently has a consensus price target of $12.77, indicating a potential upside of 79.02%. Given BTGO's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe BTGO is more favorable than Chicago Atlantic BDC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
BTGO
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.73
Chicago Atlantic BDC
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Summary

Chicago Atlantic BDC beats BTGO on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chicago Atlantic BDC compare to Kayne Anderson BDC?

Chicago Atlantic BDC (NASDAQ:LIEN) and Kayne Anderson BDC (NYSE:KBDC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, profitability, dividends and earnings.

Kayne Anderson BDC has a consensus price target of $14.50, indicating a potential upside of 16.42%. Given Kayne Anderson BDC's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Kayne Anderson BDC is more favorable than Chicago Atlantic BDC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Chicago Atlantic BDC
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Kayne Anderson BDC
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.20

In the previous week, Kayne Anderson BDC had 2 more articles in the media than Chicago Atlantic BDC. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Kayne Anderson BDC and 1 mentions for Chicago Atlantic BDC. Chicago Atlantic BDC's average media sentiment score of 1.82 beat Kayne Anderson BDC's score of -0.61 indicating that Chicago Atlantic BDC is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Chicago Atlantic BDC Very Positive
Kayne Anderson BDC Negative

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a beta of 0.3, indicating that its stock price is 70% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kayne Anderson BDC has a beta of 0.34, indicating that its stock price is 66% less volatile than the broader market.

4.4% of Chicago Atlantic BDC shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.9% of Chicago Atlantic BDC shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Kayne Anderson BDC shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Chicago Atlantic BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.9%. Kayne Anderson BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.8%. Chicago Atlantic BDC pays out 97.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Kayne Anderson BDC pays out 146.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Chicago Atlantic BDC is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a net margin of 52.82% compared to Kayne Anderson BDC's net margin of 31.54%. Chicago Atlantic BDC's return on equity of 11.66% beat Kayne Anderson BDC's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Chicago Atlantic BDC52.82% 11.66% 10.21%
Kayne Anderson BDC 31.54%10.63%5.06%

Kayne Anderson BDC has higher revenue and earnings than Chicago Atlantic BDC. Chicago Atlantic BDC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kayne Anderson BDC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chicago Atlantic BDC$54.30M3.85$33.28M$1.396.58
Kayne Anderson BDC$235.82M3.49$93.71M$1.0911.43

Summary

Chicago Atlantic BDC beats Kayne Anderson BDC on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chicago Atlantic BDC compare to Patria Investments?

Patria Investments (NYSE:PAX) and Chicago Atlantic BDC (NASDAQ:LIEN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, valuation, profitability and institutional ownership.

Patria Investments pays an annual dividend of $0.65 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.5%. Chicago Atlantic BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.9%. Patria Investments pays out 147.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Chicago Atlantic BDC pays out 97.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Chicago Atlantic BDC is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a net margin of 52.82% compared to Patria Investments' net margin of 19.91%. Patria Investments' return on equity of 38.68% beat Chicago Atlantic BDC's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Patria Investments19.91% 38.68% 15.84%
Chicago Atlantic BDC 52.82%11.66%10.21%

Patria Investments has higher revenue and earnings than Chicago Atlantic BDC. Chicago Atlantic BDC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Patria Investments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Patria Investments$428M1.84$73.40M$0.4426.98
Chicago Atlantic BDC$54.30M3.85$33.28M$1.396.58

96.3% of Patria Investments shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.4% of Chicago Atlantic BDC shares are owned by institutional investors. 58.1% of Patria Investments shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 12.9% of Chicago Atlantic BDC shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Patria Investments has a beta of 0.8, meaning that its share price is 20% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chicago Atlantic BDC has a beta of 0.3, meaning that its share price is 70% less volatile than the broader market.

Patria Investments presently has a consensus price target of $12.75, suggesting a potential upside of 7.41%. Given Patria Investments' higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Patria Investments is more favorable than Chicago Atlantic BDC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Patria Investments
3 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.60
Chicago Atlantic BDC
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

In the previous week, Patria Investments had 1 more articles in the media than Chicago Atlantic BDC. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Patria Investments and 1 mentions for Chicago Atlantic BDC. Chicago Atlantic BDC's average media sentiment score of 1.82 beat Patria Investments' score of 0.65 indicating that Chicago Atlantic BDC is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Patria Investments Positive
Chicago Atlantic BDC Very Positive

Summary

Patria Investments beats Chicago Atlantic BDC on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chicago Atlantic BDC compare to Carlyle Secured Lending?

Chicago Atlantic BDC (NASDAQ:LIEN) and Carlyle Secured Lending (NASDAQ:CGBD) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings and profitability.

4.4% of Chicago Atlantic BDC shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.5% of Carlyle Secured Lending shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.9% of Chicago Atlantic BDC shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Carlyle Secured Lending shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Chicago Atlantic BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.9%. Carlyle Secured Lending pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.3%. Chicago Atlantic BDC pays out 97.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Carlyle Secured Lending pays out 274.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Chicago Atlantic BDC is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Carlyle Secured Lending had 1 more articles in the media than Chicago Atlantic BDC. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Carlyle Secured Lending and 1 mentions for Chicago Atlantic BDC. Chicago Atlantic BDC's average media sentiment score of 1.82 beat Carlyle Secured Lending's score of 0.79 indicating that Chicago Atlantic BDC is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Chicago Atlantic BDC Very Positive
Carlyle Secured Lending Positive

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a beta of 0.3, indicating that its stock price is 70% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Carlyle Secured Lending has a beta of 0.66, indicating that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the broader market.

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a net margin of 52.82% compared to Carlyle Secured Lending's net margin of 14.26%. Chicago Atlantic BDC's return on equity of 11.66% beat Carlyle Secured Lending's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Chicago Atlantic BDC52.82% 11.66% 10.21%
Carlyle Secured Lending 14.26%8.85%3.90%

Carlyle Secured Lending has higher revenue and earnings than Chicago Atlantic BDC. Chicago Atlantic BDC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Carlyle Secured Lending, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chicago Atlantic BDC$54.30M3.85$33.28M$1.396.58
Carlyle Secured Lending$255.57M2.84$69.97M$0.5120.65

Carlyle Secured Lending has a consensus target price of $11.33, indicating a potential upside of 7.63%. Given Carlyle Secured Lending's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Carlyle Secured Lending is more favorable than Chicago Atlantic BDC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Chicago Atlantic BDC
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Carlyle Secured Lending
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.17

Summary

Chicago Atlantic BDC and Carlyle Secured Lending tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Chicago Atlantic BDC News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for LIEN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding LIEN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

LIEN vs. The Competition

MetricChicago Atlantic BDCCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$211.55M$5.17B$13.44B$13.27B
Dividend Yield14.67%7.61%6.08%20.73%
P/E Ratio6.5830.0424.7025.82
Price / Sales3.851,205.55490.7191.80
Price / Cash6.8247.6229.5336.12
Price / Book0.693.482.726.10
Net Income$33.28M$415.07M$1.32B$380.59M
7 Day Performance-3.58%-0.34%-0.61%-2.03%
1 Month Performance-9.76%-1.79%-2.59%-4.22%
1 Year Performance-9.58%8.94%10.78%-1.55%

Chicago Atlantic BDC Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
LIEN
Chicago Atlantic BDC
3.4345 of 5 stars
$9.15
-1.3%
N/A-10.6%$211.55M$54.30M6.581,200
RPC
Ridgepost Capital
4.1017 of 5 stars
$7.92
+3.9%
$13.00
+64.2%
N/A$872.77M$297.35M31.67326
BTGO
BTGO
2.89 of 5 stars
$7.41
+0.4%
$12.77
+72.4%
N/A$870.69M$16.15BN/A603
KBDC
Kayne Anderson BDC
3.6539 of 5 stars
$12.71
+0.3%
$14.50
+14.1%
-8.2%$839.50M$235.82M11.663
PAX
Patria Investments
3.2623 of 5 stars
$11.10
+8.7%
$12.75
+14.9%
-14.0%$738.41M$399.23M22.20548

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:LIEN) was last updated on 10/13/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners