Chicago Atlantic BDC (LIEN) Competitors

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a beta of 0.3, suggesting that its share price is 70% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Barings Bdc has a beta of 0.6, suggesting that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market.

4.4% of Chicago Atlantic BDC shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 44.1% of Barings Bdc shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.9% of Chicago Atlantic BDC shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Barings Bdc shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a net margin of 52.82% compared to Barings Bdc's net margin of 32.73%. Chicago Atlantic BDC's return on equity of 11.66% beat Barings Bdc's return on equity.

Chicago Atlantic BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.1%. Barings Bdc pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.8%. Chicago Atlantic BDC pays out 97.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Barings Bdc pays out 125.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Barings Bdc has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Chicago Atlantic BDC is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Barings Bdc has a consensus target price of $9.75, suggesting a potential upside of 10.98%. Given Barings Bdc's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Barings Bdc is more favorable than Chicago Atlantic BDC.

In the previous week, Chicago Atlantic BDC had 4 more articles in the media than Barings Bdc. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Chicago Atlantic BDC and 0 mentions for Barings Bdc. Barings Bdc's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Chicago Atlantic BDC's score of -0.12 indicating that Barings Bdc is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Barings Bdc has higher revenue and earnings than Chicago Atlantic BDC. Chicago Atlantic BDC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Barings Bdc, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Chicago Atlantic BDC has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Ridgepost Capital. Chicago Atlantic BDC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ridgepost Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

48.1% of Ridgepost Capital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.4% of Chicago Atlantic BDC shares are held by institutional investors. 11.8% of Ridgepost Capital shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 12.9% of Chicago Atlantic BDC shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Ridgepost Capital has a beta of 0.87, meaning that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chicago Atlantic BDC has a beta of 0.3, meaning that its stock price is 70% less volatile than the broader market.

Ridgepost Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Chicago Atlantic BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.1%. Ridgepost Capital pays out 64.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Chicago Atlantic BDC pays out 97.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

In the previous week, Chicago Atlantic BDC had 3 more articles in the media than Ridgepost Capital. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Chicago Atlantic BDC and 1 mentions for Ridgepost Capital. Ridgepost Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Chicago Atlantic BDC's score of -0.12 indicating that Ridgepost Capital is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Ridgepost Capital presently has a consensus target price of $13.00, suggesting a potential upside of 64.64%. Given Ridgepost Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Ridgepost Capital is more favorable than Chicago Atlantic BDC.

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a net margin of 52.82% compared to Ridgepost Capital's net margin of 9.03%. Ridgepost Capital's return on equity of 21.02% beat Chicago Atlantic BDC's return on equity.

In the previous week, Kayne Anderson BDC had 5 more articles in the media than Chicago Atlantic BDC. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Kayne Anderson BDC and 4 mentions for Chicago Atlantic BDC. Kayne Anderson BDC's average media sentiment score of 1.50 beat Chicago Atlantic BDC's score of -0.12 indicating that Kayne Anderson BDC is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a net margin of 52.82% compared to Kayne Anderson BDC's net margin of 31.54%. Chicago Atlantic BDC's return on equity of 11.66% beat Kayne Anderson BDC's return on equity.

Chicago Atlantic BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.1%. Kayne Anderson BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.1%. Chicago Atlantic BDC pays out 97.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Kayne Anderson BDC pays out 146.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Chicago Atlantic BDC is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Kayne Anderson BDC has a consensus target price of $14.50, indicating a potential upside of 10.07%. Given Kayne Anderson BDC's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Kayne Anderson BDC is more favorable than Chicago Atlantic BDC.

Kayne Anderson BDC has higher revenue and earnings than Chicago Atlantic BDC. Chicago Atlantic BDC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kayne Anderson BDC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a beta of 0.3, indicating that its stock price is 70% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kayne Anderson BDC has a beta of 0.32, indicating that its stock price is 68% less volatile than the broader market.

4.4% of Chicago Atlantic BDC shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.9% of Chicago Atlantic BDC shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Kayne Anderson BDC shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a beta of 0.3, suggesting that its stock price is 70% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Carlyle Secured Lending has a beta of 0.64, suggesting that its stock price is 36% less volatile than the broader market.

Carlyle Secured Lending has higher revenue and earnings than Chicago Atlantic BDC. Chicago Atlantic BDC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Carlyle Secured Lending, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Chicago Atlantic BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.1%. Carlyle Secured Lending pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.2%. Chicago Atlantic BDC pays out 97.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Carlyle Secured Lending pays out 274.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Chicago Atlantic BDC is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a net margin of 52.82% compared to Carlyle Secured Lending's net margin of 14.26%. Chicago Atlantic BDC's return on equity of 11.66% beat Carlyle Secured Lending's return on equity.

4.4% of Chicago Atlantic BDC shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.5% of Carlyle Secured Lending shares are held by institutional investors. 12.9% of Chicago Atlantic BDC shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Carlyle Secured Lending shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Carlyle Secured Lending has a consensus target price of $12.50, suggesting a potential upside of 9.12%. Given Carlyle Secured Lending's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Carlyle Secured Lending is more favorable than Chicago Atlantic BDC.

In the previous week, Chicago Atlantic BDC had 2 more articles in the media than Carlyle Secured Lending. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Chicago Atlantic BDC and 2 mentions for Carlyle Secured Lending. Carlyle Secured Lending's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Chicago Atlantic BDC's score of -0.12 indicating that Carlyle Secured Lending is being referred to more favorably in the news media.