Free Trial

Chicago Atlantic BDC (LIEN) Competitors

Chicago Atlantic BDC logo
$10.00 +0.09 (+0.91%)
Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$9.99 -0.01 (-0.10%)
As of 04:10 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

LIEN vs. BBDC, BCSF, CGBD, NMFC, and FDUS

Should you buy Chicago Atlantic BDC stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Chicago Atlantic BDC with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Chicago Atlantic BDC include Barings Bdc (BBDC), Bain Capital Specialty Finance (BCSF), Carlyle Secured Lending (CGBD), New Mountain Finance (NMFC), and Fidus Investment (FDUS). These companies are all part of the "fin - sbic&commrl" industry.

How does Chicago Atlantic BDC compare to Barings Bdc?

Chicago Atlantic BDC (NASDAQ:LIEN) and Barings Bdc (NYSE:BBDC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and risk.

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a beta of 0.28, indicating that its share price is 72% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Barings Bdc has a beta of 0.58, indicating that its share price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

4.4% of Chicago Atlantic BDC shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 44.1% of Barings Bdc shares are held by institutional investors. 16.9% of Chicago Atlantic BDC shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Barings Bdc shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Barings Bdc has a consensus price target of $9.50, indicating a potential upside of 13.57%. Given Barings Bdc's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Barings Bdc is more favorable than Chicago Atlantic BDC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Chicago Atlantic BDC
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
4.00
Barings Bdc
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a net margin of 57.88% compared to Barings Bdc's net margin of 32.45%. Chicago Atlantic BDC's return on equity of 11.67% beat Barings Bdc's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Chicago Atlantic BDC57.88% 11.67% 10.30%
Barings Bdc 32.45%10.08%4.33%

Chicago Atlantic BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.6%. Barings Bdc pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.4%. Chicago Atlantic BDC pays out 90.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Barings Bdc pays out 122.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Barings Bdc has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Chicago Atlantic BDC is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Barings Bdc has higher revenue and earnings than Chicago Atlantic BDC. Chicago Atlantic BDC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Barings Bdc, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chicago Atlantic BDC$54.30M4.20$33.28M$1.506.67
Barings Bdc$279.21M3.14$101.92M$0.859.84

In the previous week, Chicago Atlantic BDC had 1 more articles in the media than Barings Bdc. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Chicago Atlantic BDC and 1 mentions for Barings Bdc. Barings Bdc's average media sentiment score of 1.62 beat Chicago Atlantic BDC's score of 0.44 indicating that Barings Bdc is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Chicago Atlantic BDC Neutral
Barings Bdc Very Positive

Summary

Chicago Atlantic BDC beats Barings Bdc on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chicago Atlantic BDC compare to Bain Capital Specialty Finance?

Chicago Atlantic BDC (NASDAQ:LIEN) and Bain Capital Specialty Finance (NYSE:BCSF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

Bain Capital Specialty Finance has a consensus target price of $14.00, suggesting a potential upside of 8.38%. Given Bain Capital Specialty Finance's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Bain Capital Specialty Finance is more favorable than Chicago Atlantic BDC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Chicago Atlantic BDC
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
4.00
Bain Capital Specialty Finance
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a net margin of 57.88% compared to Bain Capital Specialty Finance's net margin of 27.00%. Chicago Atlantic BDC's return on equity of 11.67% beat Bain Capital Specialty Finance's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Chicago Atlantic BDC57.88% 11.67% 10.30%
Bain Capital Specialty Finance 27.00%10.44%4.35%

4.4% of Chicago Atlantic BDC shares are held by institutional investors. 16.9% of Chicago Atlantic BDC shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Bain Capital Specialty Finance shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Bain Capital Specialty Finance has higher revenue and earnings than Chicago Atlantic BDC. Chicago Atlantic BDC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bain Capital Specialty Finance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chicago Atlantic BDC$54.30M4.20$33.28M$1.506.67
Bain Capital Specialty Finance$273.24M3.07$98.76M$1.1411.33

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a beta of 0.28, meaning that its stock price is 72% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bain Capital Specialty Finance has a beta of 0.57, meaning that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Chicago Atlantic BDC had 1 more articles in the media than Bain Capital Specialty Finance. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Chicago Atlantic BDC and 1 mentions for Bain Capital Specialty Finance. Chicago Atlantic BDC's average media sentiment score of 0.44 beat Bain Capital Specialty Finance's score of 0.25 indicating that Chicago Atlantic BDC is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Chicago Atlantic BDC Neutral
Bain Capital Specialty Finance Neutral

Chicago Atlantic BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.6%. Bain Capital Specialty Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.0%. Chicago Atlantic BDC pays out 90.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Bain Capital Specialty Finance pays out 147.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Bain Capital Specialty Finance has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Chicago Atlantic BDC is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Chicago Atlantic BDC beats Bain Capital Specialty Finance on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chicago Atlantic BDC compare to Carlyle Secured Lending?

Chicago Atlantic BDC (NASDAQ:LIEN) and Carlyle Secured Lending (NASDAQ:CGBD) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment and valuation.

4.4% of Chicago Atlantic BDC shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.5% of Carlyle Secured Lending shares are held by institutional investors. 16.9% of Chicago Atlantic BDC shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Carlyle Secured Lending shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a net margin of 57.88% compared to Carlyle Secured Lending's net margin of 19.52%. Chicago Atlantic BDC's return on equity of 11.67% beat Carlyle Secured Lending's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Chicago Atlantic BDC57.88% 11.67% 10.30%
Carlyle Secured Lending 19.52%8.99%4.01%

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a beta of 0.28, indicating that its share price is 72% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Carlyle Secured Lending has a beta of 0.62, indicating that its share price is 38% less volatile than the broader market.

Chicago Atlantic BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.6%. Carlyle Secured Lending pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.6%. Chicago Atlantic BDC pays out 90.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Carlyle Secured Lending pays out 225.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Carlyle Secured Lending has a consensus price target of $12.50, indicating a potential upside of 13.84%. Given Carlyle Secured Lending's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Carlyle Secured Lending is more favorable than Chicago Atlantic BDC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Chicago Atlantic BDC
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
4.00
Carlyle Secured Lending
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43

Carlyle Secured Lending has higher revenue and earnings than Chicago Atlantic BDC. Chicago Atlantic BDC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Carlyle Secured Lending, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chicago Atlantic BDC$54.30M4.20$33.28M$1.506.67
Carlyle Secured Lending$255.57M2.99$69.97M$0.7115.46

In the previous week, Chicago Atlantic BDC and Chicago Atlantic BDC both had 2 articles in the media. Carlyle Secured Lending's average media sentiment score of 1.39 beat Chicago Atlantic BDC's score of 0.44 indicating that Carlyle Secured Lending is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Chicago Atlantic BDC Neutral
Carlyle Secured Lending Positive

Summary

Chicago Atlantic BDC and Carlyle Secured Lending tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chicago Atlantic BDC compare to New Mountain Finance?

Chicago Atlantic BDC (NASDAQ:LIEN) and New Mountain Finance (NASDAQ:NMFC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, risk, dividends, earnings and institutional ownership.

Chicago Atlantic BDC has higher earnings, but lower revenue than New Mountain Finance. New Mountain Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chicago Atlantic BDC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chicago Atlantic BDC$54.30M4.20$33.28M$1.506.67
New Mountain Finance$327.08M2.30$16.49M-$0.58N/A

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a beta of 0.28, indicating that its share price is 72% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, New Mountain Finance has a beta of 0.54, indicating that its share price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

New Mountain Finance has a consensus target price of $9.25, indicating a potential upside of 16.35%. Given New Mountain Finance's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe New Mountain Finance is more favorable than Chicago Atlantic BDC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Chicago Atlantic BDC
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
4.00
New Mountain Finance
2 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.71

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a net margin of 57.88% compared to New Mountain Finance's net margin of -18.65%. Chicago Atlantic BDC's return on equity of 11.67% beat New Mountain Finance's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Chicago Atlantic BDC57.88% 11.67% 10.30%
New Mountain Finance -18.65%11.14%4.63%

In the previous week, New Mountain Finance had 2 more articles in the media than Chicago Atlantic BDC. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for New Mountain Finance and 2 mentions for Chicago Atlantic BDC. New Mountain Finance's average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Chicago Atlantic BDC's score of 0.44 indicating that New Mountain Finance is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Chicago Atlantic BDC Neutral
New Mountain Finance Positive

4.4% of Chicago Atlantic BDC shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.1% of New Mountain Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.9% of Chicago Atlantic BDC shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 14.9% of New Mountain Finance shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Chicago Atlantic BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.6%. New Mountain Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 16.1%. Chicago Atlantic BDC pays out 90.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. New Mountain Finance pays out -220.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. New Mountain Finance is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Chicago Atlantic BDC beats New Mountain Finance on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Chicago Atlantic BDC compare to Fidus Investment?

Chicago Atlantic BDC (NASDAQ:LIEN) and Fidus Investment (NASDAQ:FDUS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, risk, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Fidus Investment has a consensus price target of $21.00, suggesting a potential upside of 11.58%. Given Fidus Investment's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Fidus Investment is more favorable than Chicago Atlantic BDC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Chicago Atlantic BDC
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
4.00
Fidus Investment
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a beta of 0.28, suggesting that its share price is 72% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fidus Investment has a beta of 0.68, suggesting that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

Fidus Investment has higher revenue and earnings than Chicago Atlantic BDC. Chicago Atlantic BDC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fidus Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chicago Atlantic BDC$54.30M4.20$33.28M$1.506.67
Fidus Investment$98.45M7.26$82.40M$2.288.25

Chicago Atlantic BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.6%. Fidus Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.1%. Chicago Atlantic BDC pays out 90.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Fidus Investment pays out 75.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Chicago Atlantic BDC has a net margin of 57.88% compared to Fidus Investment's net margin of 49.51%. Chicago Atlantic BDC's return on equity of 11.67% beat Fidus Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Chicago Atlantic BDC57.88% 11.67% 10.30%
Fidus Investment 49.51%11.19%5.97%

4.4% of Chicago Atlantic BDC shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.1% of Fidus Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.9% of Chicago Atlantic BDC shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Fidus Investment shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Fidus Investment had 1 more articles in the media than Chicago Atlantic BDC. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Fidus Investment and 2 mentions for Chicago Atlantic BDC. Fidus Investment's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Chicago Atlantic BDC's score of 0.44 indicating that Fidus Investment is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Chicago Atlantic BDC Neutral
Fidus Investment Positive

Summary

Fidus Investment beats Chicago Atlantic BDC on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Chicago Atlantic BDC News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for LIEN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding LIEN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

LIEN vs. The Competition

MetricChicago Atlantic BDCFIN IndustryFinance SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$228.20M$1.32B$13.83B$11.98B
Dividend Yield13.75%13.25%5.78%5.57%
P/E Ratio6.6711.0320.1524.45
Price / Sales4.2017.58138.23122.24
Price / Cash7.287.0619.2754.62
Price / Book0.750.782.246.80
Net Income$33.28M$121.13M$1.14B$337.76M
7 Day Performance2.15%1.64%1.40%2.08%
1 Month Performance10.25%-2.62%1.50%3.16%
1 Year Performance-1.19%-21.02%11.50%27.79%

Chicago Atlantic BDC Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
LIEN
Chicago Atlantic BDC
1.1403 of 5 stars
$10.00
+0.9%
N/A-1.7%$228.20M$54.30M6.67N/A
BBDC
Barings Bdc
4.2715 of 5 stars
$8.34
-0.1%
$9.50
+14.0%
-7.8%$872.73M$101.66M9.8126
BCSF
Bain Capital Specialty Finance
2.23 of 5 stars
$12.85
+0.5%
$14.00
+8.9%
-17.9%$832.27M$88.67M11.251,000
CGBD
Carlyle Secured Lending
3.7996 of 5 stars
$10.63
-0.1%
$12.50
+17.6%
-22.8%$739.10M$63.06M14.98N/A
NMFC
New Mountain Finance
3.3353 of 5 stars
$7.82
-0.2%
$9.25
+18.4%
-26.9%$738.14M-$64.32MN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:LIEN) was last updated on 6/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners