Marzetti (MZTI) Competitors

Marzetti has a beta of 0.35, suggesting that its stock price is 65% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hormel Foods has a beta of 0.33, suggesting that its stock price is 67% less volatile than the broader market.

Marzetti pays an annual dividend of $4.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Hormel Foods pays an annual dividend of $1.17 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.4%. Marzetti pays out 57.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hormel Foods pays out 185.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Marzetti has increased its dividend for 62 consecutive years and Hormel Foods has increased its dividend for 60 consecutive years.

66.4% of Marzetti shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.0% of Hormel Foods shares are owned by institutional investors. 29.1% of Marzetti shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Hormel Foods shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Marzetti has a net margin of 9.93% compared to Hormel Foods' net margin of 2.82%. Marzetti's return on equity of 18.22% beat Hormel Foods' return on equity.

Marzetti presently has a consensus price target of $135.00, indicating a potential upside of 27.79%. Hormel Foods has a consensus price target of $26.14, indicating a potential upside of 20.42%. Given Marzetti's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Marzetti is more favorable than Hormel Foods.

Hormel Foods has higher revenue and earnings than Marzetti. Marzetti is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hormel Foods, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Hormel Foods had 7 more articles in the media than Marzetti. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Hormel Foods and 16 mentions for Marzetti. Marzetti's average media sentiment score of 1.24 beat Hormel Foods' score of 0.47 indicating that Marzetti is being referred to more favorably in the media.

In the previous week, Marzetti had 11 more articles in the media than JBS. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Marzetti and 5 mentions for JBS. Marzetti's average media sentiment score of 1.24 beat JBS's score of 0.18 indicating that Marzetti is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

JBS has higher revenue and earnings than Marzetti. JBS is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marzetti, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

JBS has a beta of -1.67, meaning that its share price is 267% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Marzetti has a beta of 0.35, meaning that its share price is 65% less volatile than the broader market.

JBS pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.6%. Marzetti pays an annual dividend of $4.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. JBS pays out 98.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Marzetti pays out 57.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Marzetti has increased its dividend for 62 consecutive years.

66.4% of Marzetti shares are owned by institutional investors. 29.1% of Marzetti shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

JBS currently has a consensus target price of $18.42, indicating a potential upside of 39.73%. Marzetti has a consensus target price of $135.00, indicating a potential upside of 27.79%. Given JBS's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe JBS is more favorable than Marzetti.

Marzetti has a net margin of 9.93% compared to JBS's net margin of 1.22%. Marzetti's return on equity of 18.22% beat JBS's return on equity.

Marzetti currently has a consensus price target of $135.00, suggesting a potential upside of 27.79%. Smithfield Foods has a consensus price target of $31.50, suggesting a potential upside of 42.99%. Given Smithfield Foods' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Smithfield Foods is more favorable than Marzetti.

Marzetti has a beta of 0.35, suggesting that its share price is 65% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Smithfield Foods has a beta of -0.51, suggesting that its share price is 151% less volatile than the broader market.

Smithfield Foods has higher revenue and earnings than Marzetti. Smithfield Foods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marzetti, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Marzetti has a net margin of 9.93% compared to Smithfield Foods' net margin of 6.84%. Marzetti's return on equity of 18.22% beat Smithfield Foods' return on equity.

Marzetti pays an annual dividend of $4.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Smithfield Foods pays an annual dividend of $1.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.7%. Marzetti pays out 57.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Smithfield Foods pays out 46.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Marzetti has raised its dividend for 62 consecutive years. Smithfield Foods is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

66.4% of Marzetti shares are held by institutional investors. 29.1% of Marzetti shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Smithfield Foods shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Marzetti had 12 more articles in the media than Smithfield Foods. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Marzetti and 4 mentions for Smithfield Foods. Marzetti's average media sentiment score of 1.24 beat Smithfield Foods' score of 0.92 indicating that Marzetti is being referred to more favorably in the media.

In the previous week, Conagra Brands had 1 more articles in the media than Marzetti. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Conagra Brands and 16 mentions for Marzetti. Marzetti's average media sentiment score of 1.24 beat Conagra Brands' score of 1.09 indicating that Marzetti is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Marzetti pays an annual dividend of $4.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Conagra Brands pays an annual dividend of $0.70 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.5%. Marzetti pays out 57.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Conagra Brands pays out -17.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Marzetti has raised its dividend for 62 consecutive years and Conagra Brands has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Conagra Brands is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Marzetti has a net margin of 9.93% compared to Conagra Brands' net margin of -16.99%. Marzetti's return on equity of 18.22% beat Conagra Brands' return on equity.

Marzetti presently has a consensus target price of $135.00, indicating a potential upside of 27.79%. Conagra Brands has a consensus target price of $14.07, indicating a potential downside of 10.00%. Given Marzetti's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Marzetti is more favorable than Conagra Brands.

66.4% of Marzetti shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.8% of Conagra Brands shares are held by institutional investors. 29.1% of Marzetti shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Conagra Brands shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Marzetti has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Conagra Brands. Conagra Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marzetti, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Marzetti has a beta of 0.35, indicating that its stock price is 65% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Conagra Brands has a beta of -0.01, indicating that its stock price is 101% less volatile than the broader market.