Go Pro

QT Imaging (QTI) Competitors

QT Imaging logo
$4.05 0.00 (0.00%)
Closing price 07/2/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$3.90 -0.15 (-3.80%)
As of 07/2/2026 07:47 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

QTI vs. APYX, HYPR, STEX, CVRX, and GUTS

Should you buy QT Imaging stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares QT Imaging with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with QT Imaging include Apyx Medical (APYX), Hyperfine (HYPR), Biosig Technologies (STEX), CVRx (CVRX), and Fractyl Health (GUTS). These companies are all part of the "medical equipment" industry.

How does QT Imaging compare to Apyx Medical?

Apyx Medical (NASDAQ:APYX) and QT Imaging (NASDAQ:QTI) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership and valuation.

Apyx Medical has a net margin of -16.40% compared to QT Imaging's net margin of -58.93%. Apyx Medical's return on equity of -88.47% beat QT Imaging's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Apyx Medical-16.40% -88.47% -14.94%
QT Imaging -58.93%-4,220.38%-51.77%

Apyx Medical presently has a consensus target price of $6.50, indicating a potential upside of 51.16%. Given Apyx Medical's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Apyx Medical is more favorable than QT Imaging.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Apyx Medical
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
QT Imaging
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

55.3% of Apyx Medical shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.2% of QT Imaging shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.9% of Apyx Medical shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 28.8% of QT Imaging shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Apyx Medical and Apyx Medical both had 1 articles in the media. QT Imaging's average media sentiment score of 1.34 beat Apyx Medical's score of 0.00 indicating that QT Imaging is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Apyx Medical
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
QT Imaging
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Apyx Medical has higher revenue and earnings than QT Imaging. Apyx Medical is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than QT Imaging, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Apyx Medical$52.84M3.41-$11.21M-$0.22N/A
QT Imaging$22.66M2.15-$21.08M-$1.24N/A

Apyx Medical has a beta of 1.37, meaning that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, QT Imaging has a beta of -0.04, meaning that its stock price is 104% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Apyx Medical beats QT Imaging on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does QT Imaging compare to Hyperfine?

QT Imaging (NASDAQ:QTI) and Hyperfine (NASDAQ:HYPR) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, media sentiment, valuation and profitability.

In the previous week, Hyperfine had 2 more articles in the media than QT Imaging. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Hyperfine and 1 mentions for QT Imaging. QT Imaging's average media sentiment score of 1.34 beat Hyperfine's score of 0.00 indicating that QT Imaging is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
QT Imaging
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Hyperfine
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Hyperfine has a consensus price target of $1.78, suggesting a potential upside of 37.18%. Given Hyperfine's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Hyperfine is more favorable than QT Imaging.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
QT Imaging
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Hyperfine
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

24.2% of QT Imaging shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.0% of Hyperfine shares are held by institutional investors. 28.8% of QT Imaging shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 26.3% of Hyperfine shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

QT Imaging has a beta of -0.04, meaning that its stock price is 104% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hyperfine has a beta of 1.4, meaning that its stock price is 40% more volatile than the broader market.

QT Imaging has a net margin of -58.93% compared to Hyperfine's net margin of -226.88%. Hyperfine's return on equity of -98.83% beat QT Imaging's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
QT Imaging-58.93% -4,220.38% -51.77%
Hyperfine -226.88%-98.83%-67.09%

QT Imaging has higher revenue and earnings than Hyperfine. QT Imaging is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hyperfine, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
QT Imaging$22.66M2.15-$21.08M-$1.24N/A
Hyperfine$11.40M11.32-$35.57M-$0.41N/A

Summary

Hyperfine beats QT Imaging on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does QT Imaging compare to Biosig Technologies?

QT Imaging (NASDAQ:QTI) and Biosig Technologies (NASDAQ:STEX) are both small-cap medical equipment companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability and dividends.

Biosig Technologies has a net margin of 0.00% compared to QT Imaging's net margin of -58.93%. Biosig Technologies' return on equity of -717.92% beat QT Imaging's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
QT Imaging-58.93% -4,220.38% -51.77%
Biosig Technologies N/A -717.92%-336.75%

QT Imaging has a beta of -0.04, meaning that its stock price is 104% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Biosig Technologies has a beta of 1.94, meaning that its stock price is 94% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Biosig Technologies had 1 more articles in the media than QT Imaging. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Biosig Technologies and 1 mentions for QT Imaging. QT Imaging's average media sentiment score of 1.34 beat Biosig Technologies' score of 0.00 indicating that QT Imaging is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
QT Imaging
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Biosig Technologies
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

24.2% of QT Imaging shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.2% of Biosig Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 28.8% of QT Imaging shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 52.7% of Biosig Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

QT Imaging has higher revenue and earnings than Biosig Technologies. QT Imaging is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Biosig Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
QT Imaging$22.66M2.15-$21.08M-$1.24N/A
Biosig Technologies$40K4,411.83-$462.77M-$9.71N/A

Biosig Technologies has a consensus price target of $8.00, suggesting a potential upside of 724.15%. Given Biosig Technologies' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Biosig Technologies is more favorable than QT Imaging.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
QT Imaging
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Biosig Technologies
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Summary

Biosig Technologies beats QT Imaging on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does QT Imaging compare to CVRx?

QT Imaging (NASDAQ:QTI) and CVRx (NASDAQ:CVRX) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, earnings and valuation.

In the previous week, QT Imaging had 1 more articles in the media than CVRx. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for QT Imaging and 0 mentions for CVRx. QT Imaging's average media sentiment score of 1.34 beat CVRx's score of 1.00 indicating that QT Imaging is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
QT Imaging Positive
CVRx Positive

QT Imaging has a beta of -0.04, meaning that its share price is 104% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CVRx has a beta of 0.81, meaning that its share price is 19% less volatile than the broader market.

CVRx has a consensus price target of $11.50, suggesting a potential upside of 105.36%. Given CVRx's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe CVRx is more favorable than QT Imaging.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
QT Imaging
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
CVRx
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

QT Imaging has higher earnings, but lower revenue than CVRx. QT Imaging is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CVRx, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
QT Imaging$22.66M2.15-$21.08M-$1.24N/A
CVRx$56.65M2.62-$53.31M-$2.02N/A

24.2% of QT Imaging shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.3% of CVRx shares are owned by institutional investors. 28.8% of QT Imaging shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 13.9% of CVRx shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

QT Imaging has a net margin of -58.93% compared to CVRx's net margin of -89.14%. CVRx's return on equity of -120.76% beat QT Imaging's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
QT Imaging-58.93% -4,220.38% -51.77%
CVRx -89.14%-120.76%-48.38%

Summary

CVRx beats QT Imaging on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does QT Imaging compare to Fractyl Health?

QT Imaging (NASDAQ:QTI) and Fractyl Health (NASDAQ:GUTS) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, risk, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Fractyl Health has a consensus price target of $5.12, indicating a potential upside of 571.92%. Given Fractyl Health's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Fractyl Health is more favorable than QT Imaging.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
QT Imaging
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Fractyl Health
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

24.2% of QT Imaging shares are owned by institutional investors. 28.8% of QT Imaging shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 8.5% of Fractyl Health shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

QT Imaging has a beta of -0.04, meaning that its share price is 104% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fractyl Health has a beta of 2.29, meaning that its share price is 129% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, QT Imaging and QT Imaging both had 1 articles in the media. QT Imaging's average media sentiment score of 1.34 beat Fractyl Health's score of 1.00 indicating that QT Imaging is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
QT Imaging Positive
Fractyl Health Positive

Fractyl Health has a net margin of 0.00% compared to QT Imaging's net margin of -58.93%. Fractyl Health's return on equity of -4,053.15% beat QT Imaging's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
QT Imaging-58.93% -4,220.38% -51.77%
Fractyl Health N/A -4,053.15%-96.41%

QT Imaging has higher revenue and earnings than Fractyl Health. QT Imaging is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fractyl Health, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
QT Imaging$22.66M2.15-$21.08M-$1.24N/A
Fractyl HealthN/AN/A-$140.95M-$1.29N/A

Summary

QT Imaging and Fractyl Health tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get QT Imaging News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for QTI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding QTI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

QTI vs. The Competition

MetricQT ImagingElectromedical equipment IndustryMedical SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$48.77M$80.63M$7.16B$12.48B
Dividend YieldN/AN/A2.66%6.52%
P/E Ratio-3.2710.1028.0224.70
Price / Sales2.15192.41540.3799.49
Price / CashN/A41.3649.2657.09
Price / Book7.505.5710.966.46
Net Income-$21.08M-$5.50M$3.57B$337.01M
7 Day Performance-0.49%4.59%2.12%1.69%
1 Month Performance5.47%6.31%5.25%3.81%
1 Year Performance185.61%116.90%33.29%23.90%

QT Imaging Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
QTI
QT Imaging
1.548 of 5 stars
$4.05
flat
N/A+185.6%$48.77M$22.66MN/AN/A
APYX
Apyx Medical
2.4237 of 5 stars
$4.17
+1.2%
$6.50
+55.9%
+87.4%$172.52M$52.84MN/A270
HYPR
Hyperfine
2.5505 of 5 stars
$1.69
+15.8%
$1.78
+5.5%
+64.8%$144.93M$11.40MN/A190
STEX
Biosig Technologies
1.6376 of 5 stars
$0.74
-5.4%
$8.00
+980.9%
N/A$142.28M$40KN/A50
CVRX
CVRx
3.3482 of 5 stars
$5.25
+1.7%
$11.50
+119.0%
-14.9%$136.79M$56.65MN/A160

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:QTI) was last updated on 7/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners