Free Trial
Your Portfolio Deserves Better! MarketBeat All Access for Just $149
Upgrade Now
Claim MarketBeat All Access Sale Promotion

Sight Sciences (SGHT) Competitors

Sight Sciences logo
$5.14 +0.28 (+5.76%)
As of 02:46 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

SGHT vs. IRMD, BFLY, BLFS, CNMD, and TNDM

Should you buy Sight Sciences stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Sight Sciences with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Sight Sciences include iRadimed (IRMD), Butterfly Network (BFLY), BioLife Solutions (BLFS), CONMED (CNMD), and Tandem Diabetes Care (TNDM). These companies are all part of the "medical equipment" industry.

How does Sight Sciences compare to iRadimed?

iRadimed (NASDAQ:IRMD) and Sight Sciences (NASDAQ:SGHT) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment and valuation.

iRadimed presently has a consensus price target of $120.00, suggesting a potential upside of 29.44%. Sight Sciences has a consensus price target of $8.31, suggesting a potential upside of 61.72%. Given Sight Sciences' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Sight Sciences is more favorable than iRadimed.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
iRadimed
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Sight Sciences
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.44

92.3% of iRadimed shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.5% of Sight Sciences shares are held by institutional investors. 36.8% of iRadimed shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 30.9% of Sight Sciences shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

iRadimed has higher revenue and earnings than Sight Sciences. Sight Sciences is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than iRadimed, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
iRadimed$83.81M14.14$22.48M$1.8350.66
Sight Sciences$77.36M3.62-$38.43M-$0.71N/A

In the previous week, iRadimed had 3 more articles in the media than Sight Sciences. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for iRadimed and 2 mentions for Sight Sciences. Sight Sciences' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat iRadimed's score of 0.13 indicating that Sight Sciences is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
iRadimed
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Sight Sciences
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

iRadimed has a beta of 0.9, indicating that its share price is 10% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sight Sciences has a beta of 2.38, indicating that its share price is 138% more volatile than the broader market.

iRadimed has a net margin of 27.36% compared to Sight Sciences' net margin of -46.83%. iRadimed's return on equity of 24.48% beat Sight Sciences' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
iRadimed27.36% 24.48% 21.25%
Sight Sciences -46.83%-52.34%-28.49%

Summary

iRadimed beats Sight Sciences on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sight Sciences compare to Butterfly Network?

Sight Sciences (NASDAQ:SGHT) and Butterfly Network (NYSE:BFLY) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, media sentiment, risk and profitability.

Sight Sciences has a beta of 2.38, indicating that its share price is 138% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Butterfly Network has a beta of 2.27, indicating that its share price is 127% more volatile than the broader market.

Sight Sciences presently has a consensus target price of $8.31, suggesting a potential upside of 61.72%. Butterfly Network has a consensus target price of $5.56, suggesting a potential upside of 23.47%. Given Sight Sciences' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Sight Sciences is more favorable than Butterfly Network.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Sight Sciences
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.44
Butterfly Network
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Sight Sciences has a net margin of -46.83% compared to Butterfly Network's net margin of -73.63%. Butterfly Network's return on equity of -34.41% beat Sight Sciences' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sight Sciences-46.83% -52.34% -28.49%
Butterfly Network -73.63%-34.41%-23.91%

Sight Sciences has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Butterfly Network. Butterfly Network is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sight Sciences, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sight Sciences$77.36M3.62-$38.43M-$0.71N/A
Butterfly Network$102.92M11.15-$77.06M-$0.30N/A

55.5% of Sight Sciences shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.8% of Butterfly Network shares are held by institutional investors. 30.9% of Sight Sciences shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 25.2% of Butterfly Network shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Sight Sciences had 1 more articles in the media than Butterfly Network. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Sight Sciences and 1 mentions for Butterfly Network. Sight Sciences' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Butterfly Network's score of 0.00 indicating that Sight Sciences is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Sight Sciences
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Butterfly Network
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Sight Sciences beats Butterfly Network on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sight Sciences compare to BioLife Solutions?

BioLife Solutions (NASDAQ:BLFS) and Sight Sciences (NASDAQ:SGHT) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends and media sentiment.

BioLife Solutions has higher revenue and earnings than Sight Sciences. BioLife Solutions is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sight Sciences, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BioLife Solutions$96.21M12.41-$4.59M-$0.08N/A
Sight Sciences$77.36M3.62-$38.43M-$0.71N/A

BioLife Solutions has a beta of 1.97, meaning that its share price is 97% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sight Sciences has a beta of 2.38, meaning that its share price is 138% more volatile than the broader market.

BioLife Solutions presently has a consensus target price of $32.00, suggesting a potential upside of 30.99%. Sight Sciences has a consensus target price of $8.31, suggesting a potential upside of 61.72%. Given Sight Sciences' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Sight Sciences is more favorable than BioLife Solutions.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
BioLife Solutions
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40
Sight Sciences
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.44

BioLife Solutions has a net margin of -2.80% compared to Sight Sciences' net margin of -46.83%. BioLife Solutions' return on equity of 1.81% beat Sight Sciences' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
BioLife Solutions-2.80% 1.81% 1.65%
Sight Sciences -46.83%-52.34%-28.49%

In the previous week, Sight Sciences had 1 more articles in the media than BioLife Solutions. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Sight Sciences and 1 mentions for BioLife Solutions. Sight Sciences' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat BioLife Solutions' score of -0.16 indicating that Sight Sciences is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
BioLife Solutions
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Sight Sciences
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

93.2% of BioLife Solutions shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.5% of Sight Sciences shares are held by institutional investors. 2.2% of BioLife Solutions shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 30.9% of Sight Sciences shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

BioLife Solutions and Sight Sciences tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sight Sciences compare to CONMED?

Sight Sciences (NASDAQ:SGHT) and CONMED (NYSE:CNMD) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, media sentiment, dividends and valuation.

Sight Sciences has a beta of 2.38, meaning that its share price is 138% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CONMED has a beta of 0.94, meaning that its share price is 6% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, CONMED had 2 more articles in the media than Sight Sciences. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for CONMED and 2 mentions for Sight Sciences. Sight Sciences' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat CONMED's score of -0.20 indicating that Sight Sciences is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Sight Sciences
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
CONMED
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Sight Sciences currently has a consensus target price of $8.31, indicating a potential upside of 61.72%. CONMED has a consensus target price of $43.80, indicating a potential upside of 17.81%. Given Sight Sciences' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Sight Sciences is more favorable than CONMED.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Sight Sciences
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.44
CONMED
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.86

CONMED has higher revenue and earnings than Sight Sciences. Sight Sciences is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CONMED, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sight Sciences$77.36M3.62-$38.43M-$0.71N/A
CONMED$1.37B0.81$47.06M$1.7721.01

CONMED has a net margin of 4.00% compared to Sight Sciences' net margin of -46.83%. CONMED's return on equity of 13.84% beat Sight Sciences' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sight Sciences-46.83% -52.34% -28.49%
CONMED 4.00%13.84%6.05%

55.5% of Sight Sciences shares are held by institutional investors. 30.9% of Sight Sciences shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of CONMED shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Sight Sciences and CONMED tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sight Sciences compare to Tandem Diabetes Care?

Sight Sciences (NASDAQ:SGHT) and Tandem Diabetes Care (NASDAQ:TNDM) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, dividends and earnings.

Sight Sciences currently has a consensus target price of $8.31, suggesting a potential upside of 61.72%. Tandem Diabetes Care has a consensus target price of $29.63, suggesting a potential upside of 89.76%. Given Tandem Diabetes Care's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Tandem Diabetes Care is more favorable than Sight Sciences.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Sight Sciences
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.44
Tandem Diabetes Care
1 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.52

In the previous week, Tandem Diabetes Care had 3 more articles in the media than Sight Sciences. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Tandem Diabetes Care and 2 mentions for Sight Sciences. Sight Sciences' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Tandem Diabetes Care's score of 0.20 indicating that Sight Sciences is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Sight Sciences
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Tandem Diabetes Care
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Tandem Diabetes Care has a net margin of -9.20% compared to Sight Sciences' net margin of -46.83%. Sight Sciences' return on equity of -52.34% beat Tandem Diabetes Care's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sight Sciences-46.83% -52.34% -28.49%
Tandem Diabetes Care -9.20%-53.88%-7.88%

Sight Sciences has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Tandem Diabetes Care. Tandem Diabetes Care is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sight Sciences, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sight Sciences$77.36M3.62-$38.43M-$0.71N/A
Tandem Diabetes Care$1.01B1.05-$204.71M-$1.40N/A

Sight Sciences has a beta of 2.38, indicating that its stock price is 138% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tandem Diabetes Care has a beta of 1.64, indicating that its stock price is 64% more volatile than the broader market.

55.5% of Sight Sciences shares are owned by institutional investors. 30.9% of Sight Sciences shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Tandem Diabetes Care shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Sight Sciences beats Tandem Diabetes Care on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Sight Sciences News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SGHT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SGHT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SGHT vs. The Competition

MetricSight SciencesMED INSTRUMENTS IndustryMedical SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$279.67M$6.98B$6.33B$12.33B
Dividend YieldN/A1.70%2.80%5.36%
P/E Ratio-7.2450.1320.8825.51
Price / Sales3.6272.78520.5073.06
Price / CashN/A24.4043.1855.00
Price / Book5.196.5110.017.03
Net Income-$38.43M$158.81M$3.54B$334.92M
7 Day Performance-1.15%2.03%0.38%-0.40%
1 Month Performance20.94%-0.94%-0.02%1.07%
1 Year Performance58.64%2.04%35.07%34.65%

Sight Sciences Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SGHT
Sight Sciences
4.1951 of 5 stars
$5.14
+5.8%
$8.31
+61.7%
+48.6%$279.67M$77.36MN/A210
IRMD
iRadimed
2.8637 of 5 stars
$84.75
+0.5%
$120.00
+41.6%
+69.6%$1.08B$83.81M46.31110
BFLY
Butterfly Network
2.381 of 5 stars
$4.19
-0.3%
$5.56
+32.9%
+92.3%$1.07B$97.61MN/A460
BLFS
BioLife Solutions
2.6542 of 5 stars
$21.23
-2.3%
$32.00
+50.7%
+5.2%$1.06B$96.21MN/A440
CNMD
CONMED
2.8075 of 5 stars
$36.06
+2.4%
$46.20
+28.1%
-38.4%$1.06B$1.37B20.373,900

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:SGHT) was last updated on 5/21/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners