Go Pro

Rubicon Technology (RBCN) Competitors

Rubicon Technology logo
$5.57 -0.03 (-0.59%)
As of 07/2/2026 03:58 PM Eastern

RBCN vs. RGTZ, AMAT, LRCX, KLAC, and Q

Should you buy Rubicon Technology stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Rubicon Technology with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Rubicon Technology include Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RGTI ETF (RGTZ), Applied Materials (AMAT), Lam Research (LRCX), KLA (KLAC), and Qnity Electronics (Q). These companies are all part of the "semiconductor equipment" industry.

How does Rubicon Technology compare to Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RGTI ETF?

Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RGTI ETF (NASDAQ:RGTZ) and Rubicon Technology (NASDAQ:RBCN) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership and dividends.

Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RGTI ETF has a beta of -23.62, suggesting that its stock price is 2,462% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Rubicon Technology has a beta of 1.39, suggesting that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the broader market.

Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RGTI ETF has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Rubicon Technology's net margin of -29.90%. Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RGTI ETF's return on equity of 0.00% beat Rubicon Technology's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RGTI ETFN/A N/A N/A
Rubicon Technology -29.90%-122.29%-47.56%

Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RGTI ETF has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Rubicon Technology.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RGTI ETFN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Rubicon Technology$3.88M13.45-$10K$0.1150.61

0.0% of Rubicon Technology shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.6% of Rubicon Technology shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Rubicon Technology had 1 more articles in the media than Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RGTI ETF. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Rubicon Technology and 0 mentions for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RGTI ETF. Rubicon Technology's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RGTI ETF's score of 0.00 indicating that Rubicon Technology is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RGTI ETF Neutral
Rubicon Technology Positive

Summary

Rubicon Technology beats Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RGTI ETF on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Rubicon Technology compare to Applied Materials?

Applied Materials (NASDAQ:AMAT) and Rubicon Technology (NASDAQ:RBCN) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings and risk.

Applied Materials currently has a consensus target price of $553.56, suggesting a potential downside of 8.20%. Given Applied Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Applied Materials is more favorable than Rubicon Technology.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Applied Materials
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
27 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83
Rubicon Technology
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Applied Materials has a net margin of 29.31% compared to Rubicon Technology's net margin of -29.90%. Applied Materials' return on equity of 36.97% beat Rubicon Technology's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Applied Materials29.31% 36.97% 21.30%
Rubicon Technology -29.90%-122.29%-47.56%

Applied Materials has higher revenue and earnings than Rubicon Technology. Rubicon Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Applied Materials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Applied Materials$29.02B16.50$7.00B$10.6556.62
Rubicon Technology$3.88M13.45-$10K$0.1150.61

Applied Materials pays an annual dividend of $2.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Rubicon Technology pays an annual dividend of $11.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 197.6%. Applied Materials pays out 19.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Rubicon Technology pays out 10,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Applied Materials has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years.

80.6% of Applied Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Rubicon Technology shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Applied Materials shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.6% of Rubicon Technology shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Applied Materials has a beta of 1.57, indicating that its share price is 57% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Rubicon Technology has a beta of 1.39, indicating that its share price is 39% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Applied Materials had 104 more articles in the media than Rubicon Technology. MarketBeat recorded 105 mentions for Applied Materials and 1 mentions for Rubicon Technology. Applied Materials' average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Rubicon Technology's score of 0.75 indicating that Applied Materials is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Applied Materials
69 Very Positive mention(s)
9 Positive mention(s)
19 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Rubicon Technology
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Applied Materials beats Rubicon Technology on 18 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Rubicon Technology compare to Lam Research?

Lam Research (NASDAQ:LRCX) and Rubicon Technology (NASDAQ:RBCN) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment and profitability.

Lam Research pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Rubicon Technology pays an annual dividend of $11.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 197.6%. Lam Research pays out 19.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Rubicon Technology pays out 10,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Lam Research has increased its dividend for 10 consecutive years.

Lam Research has a net margin of 30.94% compared to Rubicon Technology's net margin of -29.90%. Lam Research's return on equity of 66.21% beat Rubicon Technology's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lam Research30.94% 66.21% 31.61%
Rubicon Technology -29.90%-122.29%-47.56%

84.6% of Lam Research shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Rubicon Technology shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Lam Research shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.6% of Rubicon Technology shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Lam Research has higher revenue and earnings than Rubicon Technology. Rubicon Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lam Research, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lam Research$18.44B23.84$5.36B$5.3066.30
Rubicon Technology$3.88M13.45-$10K$0.1150.61

Lam Research has a beta of 1.8, indicating that its stock price is 80% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Rubicon Technology has a beta of 1.39, indicating that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the broader market.

Lam Research currently has a consensus target price of $345.39, suggesting a potential downside of 1.71%. Given Lam Research's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Lam Research is more favorable than Rubicon Technology.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lam Research
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
28 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.82
Rubicon Technology
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Lam Research had 58 more articles in the media than Rubicon Technology. MarketBeat recorded 59 mentions for Lam Research and 1 mentions for Rubicon Technology. Lam Research's average media sentiment score of 1.13 beat Rubicon Technology's score of 0.75 indicating that Lam Research is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Lam Research
43 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Rubicon Technology
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Lam Research beats Rubicon Technology on 17 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Rubicon Technology compare to KLA?

KLA (NASDAQ:KLAC) and Rubicon Technology (NASDAQ:RBCN) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

KLA has a net margin of 35.66% compared to Rubicon Technology's net margin of -29.90%. KLA's return on equity of 91.89% beat Rubicon Technology's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
KLA35.66% 91.89% 29.21%
Rubicon Technology -29.90%-122.29%-47.56%

KLA has a beta of 1.41, suggesting that its stock price is 41% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Rubicon Technology has a beta of 1.39, suggesting that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the broader market.

KLA has higher revenue and earnings than Rubicon Technology. Rubicon Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than KLA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
KLA$12.16B25.31$4.06B$3.5366.73
Rubicon Technology$3.88M13.45-$10K$0.1150.61

KLA pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Rubicon Technology pays an annual dividend of $11.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 197.6%. KLA pays out 26.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Rubicon Technology pays out 10,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. KLA has raised its dividend for 16 consecutive years.

KLA currently has a consensus price target of $277.34, indicating a potential upside of 17.74%. Given KLA's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe KLA is more favorable than Rubicon Technology.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
KLA
0 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
20 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Rubicon Technology
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

86.7% of KLA shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Rubicon Technology shares are owned by institutional investors. 91.5% of KLA shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.6% of Rubicon Technology shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, KLA had 28 more articles in the media than Rubicon Technology. MarketBeat recorded 29 mentions for KLA and 1 mentions for Rubicon Technology. Rubicon Technology's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat KLA's score of 0.58 indicating that Rubicon Technology is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
KLA
13 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
2 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Rubicon Technology
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

KLA beats Rubicon Technology on 17 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Rubicon Technology compare to Qnity Electronics?

Qnity Electronics (NYSE:Q) and Rubicon Technology (NASDAQ:RBCN) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, valuation and profitability.

Qnity Electronics has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Rubicon Technology's net margin of -29.90%. Qnity Electronics' return on equity of 0.00% beat Rubicon Technology's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Qnity ElectronicsN/A N/A N/A
Rubicon Technology -29.90%-122.29%-47.56%

Qnity Electronics presently has a consensus target price of $152.44, suggesting a potential upside of 7.49%. Given Qnity Electronics' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Qnity Electronics is more favorable than Rubicon Technology.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Qnity Electronics
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Rubicon Technology
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

0.0% of Rubicon Technology shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Qnity Electronics shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.6% of Rubicon Technology shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Qnity Electronics has higher revenue and earnings than Rubicon Technology. Qnity Electronics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Rubicon Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Qnity Electronics$4.75B6.25$692M$2.9148.74
Rubicon Technology$3.88M13.45-$10K$0.1150.61

In the previous week, Qnity Electronics had 4 more articles in the media than Rubicon Technology. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Qnity Electronics and 1 mentions for Rubicon Technology. Qnity Electronics' average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Rubicon Technology's score of 0.75 indicating that Qnity Electronics is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Qnity Electronics
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Rubicon Technology
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Qnity Electronics pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Rubicon Technology pays an annual dividend of $11.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 197.6%. Qnity Electronics pays out 11.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Rubicon Technology pays out 10,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Summary

Qnity Electronics beats Rubicon Technology on 14 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Rubicon Technology News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for RBCN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding RBCN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

RBCN vs. The Competition

MetricRubicon TechnologyElectronic parts & equipment IndustryComputer SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$52.21M$31.96M$38.30B$12.47B
Dividend YieldN/AN/A3.17%6.51%
P/E Ratio29.3029.3078.9324.70
Price / Sales13.457.26605.36116.03
Price / Cash89.5967.8345.6257.09
Price / Book32.7517.459.556.46
Net Income-$10K-$205K$1.07B$337.01M
7 Day Performance-3.78%-9.55%1.03%1.69%
1 Month Performance-2.31%-23.94%-3.13%0.67%
1 Year Performance136.89%76.04%143.62%23.93%

Rubicon Technology Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
RBCN
Rubicon Technology
N/A$5.57
-0.6%
N/A+136.9%$52.21M$3.88M29.3010
RGTZ
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short RGTI ETF
N/A$3.86
+19.1%
N/AN/A$9.34MN/AN/AN/A
AMAT
Applied Materials
4.1824 of 5 stars
$578.05
-1.3%
$501.26
-13.3%
+216.0%$458.95B$28.37B54.2836,500
LRCX
Lam Research
4.6675 of 5 stars
$364.87
-1.7%
$334.43
-8.3%
+256.2%$456.30B$21.68B68.8419,000
KLAC
KLA
4.7963 of 5 stars
$236.03
-3.5%
$351.26
+48.8%
+157.5%$308.32B$13.10B66.8115,200

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:RBCN) was last updated on 7/4/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners