Free Trial

Safe and Green Development (RENX) Competitors

Safe and Green Development logo
$1.74 -0.16 (-8.42%)
As of 04:00 PM Eastern

RENX vs. FTHM, OMH, LHAI, AIRE, and CWD

Should you buy Safe and Green Development stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Safe and Green Development with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Safe and Green Development include Fathom (FTHM), Ohmyhome (OMH), Linkhome (LHAI), reAlpha Tech (AIRE), and CaliberCos (CWD). These companies are all part of the "real estate" industry.

How does Safe and Green Development compare to Fathom?

Fathom (NASDAQ:FTHM) and Safe and Green Development (NASDAQ:RENX) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability and media sentiment.

Fathom has a beta of 2.32, meaning that its stock price is 132% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Safe and Green Development has a beta of 4.23, meaning that its stock price is 323% more volatile than the broader market.

Safe and Green Development has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Fathom. Fathom is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Safe and Green Development, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fathom$420.48M0.03-$20.31M-$0.73N/A
Safe and Green Development$8.22M0.55-$15.96M-$70.34N/A

55.5% of Fathom shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.6% of Safe and Green Development shares are held by institutional investors. 16.4% of Fathom shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 16.9% of Safe and Green Development shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Safe and Green Development had 2 more articles in the media than Fathom. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Safe and Green Development and 1 mentions for Fathom. Fathom's average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat Safe and Green Development's score of 0.97 indicating that Fathom is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fathom Very Positive
Safe and Green Development Positive

Fathom has a net margin of -4.83% compared to Safe and Green Development's net margin of -190.02%. Fathom's return on equity of -49.25% beat Safe and Green Development's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fathom-4.83% -49.25% -25.17%
Safe and Green Development -190.02%-596.53%-48.10%

Fathom currently has a consensus target price of $2.50, suggesting a potential upside of 495.10%. Given Fathom's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Fathom is more favorable than Safe and Green Development.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Fathom
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Safe and Green Development
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Summary

Fathom beats Safe and Green Development on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Safe and Green Development compare to Ohmyhome?

Ohmyhome (NASDAQ:OMH) and Safe and Green Development (NASDAQ:RENX) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, profitability, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Ohmyhome has a beta of -0.7, suggesting that its stock price is 170% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Safe and Green Development has a beta of 4.23, suggesting that its stock price is 323% more volatile than the broader market.

0.7% of Ohmyhome shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.6% of Safe and Green Development shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.9% of Safe and Green Development shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ohmyhome
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
Safe and Green Development
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

In the previous week, Safe and Green Development had 2 more articles in the media than Ohmyhome. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Safe and Green Development and 1 mentions for Ohmyhome. Safe and Green Development's average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat Ohmyhome's score of 0.93 indicating that Safe and Green Development is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ohmyhome Positive
Safe and Green Development Positive

Ohmyhome has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Safe and Green Development's net margin of -190.02%. Ohmyhome's return on equity of 0.00% beat Safe and Green Development's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
OhmyhomeN/A N/A N/A
Safe and Green Development -190.02%-596.53%-48.10%

Ohmyhome has higher revenue and earnings than Safe and Green Development.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ohmyhome$9.20M1.57-$7.16MN/AN/A
Safe and Green Development$8.22M0.55-$15.96M-$70.34N/A

Summary

Ohmyhome beats Safe and Green Development on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Safe and Green Development compare to Linkhome?

Safe and Green Development (NASDAQ:RENX) and Linkhome (NASDAQ:LHAI) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Safe and Green Development had 2 more articles in the media than Linkhome. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Safe and Green Development and 1 mentions for Linkhome. Linkhome's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Safe and Green Development's score of 0.97 indicating that Linkhome is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Safe and Green Development Positive
Linkhome Very Positive

Linkhome has a net margin of -2.21% compared to Safe and Green Development's net margin of -190.02%. Linkhome's return on equity of -7.17% beat Safe and Green Development's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Safe and Green Development-190.02% -596.53% -48.10%
Linkhome -2.21%-7.17%-5.87%

2.6% of Safe and Green Development shares are held by institutional investors. 16.9% of Safe and Green Development shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Linkhome has higher revenue and earnings than Safe and Green Development. Linkhome is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Safe and Green Development, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Safe and Green Development$8.22M0.55-$15.96M-$70.34N/A
Linkhome$20.99M0.58$70K-$0.02N/A

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Safe and Green Development
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Linkhome
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Summary

Linkhome beats Safe and Green Development on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Safe and Green Development compare to reAlpha Tech?

reAlpha Tech (NASDAQ:AIRE) and Safe and Green Development (NASDAQ:RENX) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations and dividends.

reAlpha Tech presently has a consensus price target of $50.00, indicating a potential upside of 2,292.34%. Given reAlpha Tech's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe reAlpha Tech is more favorable than Safe and Green Development.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
reAlpha Tech
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Safe and Green Development
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

1.0% of reAlpha Tech shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.6% of Safe and Green Development shares are owned by institutional investors. 39.6% of reAlpha Tech shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 16.9% of Safe and Green Development shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Safe and Green Development has higher revenue and earnings than reAlpha Tech. reAlpha Tech is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Safe and Green Development, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
reAlpha Tech$4.52M2.48-$17.59M-$4.75N/A
Safe and Green Development$8.22M0.55-$15.96M-$70.34N/A

reAlpha Tech has a beta of -2.99, meaning that its stock price is 399% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Safe and Green Development has a beta of 4.23, meaning that its stock price is 323% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Safe and Green Development had 2 more articles in the media than reAlpha Tech. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Safe and Green Development and 1 mentions for reAlpha Tech. reAlpha Tech's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Safe and Green Development's score of 0.97 indicating that reAlpha Tech is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
reAlpha Tech Very Positive
Safe and Green Development Positive

Safe and Green Development has a net margin of -190.02% compared to reAlpha Tech's net margin of -430.43%. reAlpha Tech's return on equity of -258.24% beat Safe and Green Development's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
reAlpha Tech-430.43% -258.24% -102.31%
Safe and Green Development -190.02%-596.53%-48.10%

Summary

reAlpha Tech and Safe and Green Development tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Safe and Green Development compare to CaliberCos?

CaliberCos (NASDAQ:CWD) and Safe and Green Development (NASDAQ:RENX) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings and risk.

CaliberCos has a net margin of -122.65% compared to Safe and Green Development's net margin of -190.02%. CaliberCos' return on equity of -160.62% beat Safe and Green Development's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CaliberCos-122.65% -160.62% -18.79%
Safe and Green Development -190.02%-596.53%-48.10%

Safe and Green Development has lower revenue, but higher earnings than CaliberCos. CaliberCos is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Safe and Green Development, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CaliberCos$20.10M0.32-$21.80M-$7.56N/A
Safe and Green Development$8.22M0.55-$15.96M-$70.34N/A

CaliberCos has a beta of -0.24, meaning that its stock price is 124% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Safe and Green Development has a beta of 4.23, meaning that its stock price is 323% more volatile than the broader market.

4.1% of CaliberCos shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.6% of Safe and Green Development shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.3% of CaliberCos shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 16.9% of Safe and Green Development shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CaliberCos
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
Safe and Green Development
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

In the previous week, Safe and Green Development had 1 more articles in the media than CaliberCos. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Safe and Green Development and 2 mentions for CaliberCos. Safe and Green Development's average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat CaliberCos' score of 0.77 indicating that Safe and Green Development is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
CaliberCos
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Safe and Green Development
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

CaliberCos and Safe and Green Development tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Safe and Green Development News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for RENX and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding RENX and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

RENX vs. The Competition

MetricSafe and Green DevelopmentREAL ESTATE DEV IndustryFinance SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$4.97M$3.21B$13.70B$12.02B
Dividend YieldN/A6.13%5.78%5.61%
P/E Ratio-0.029.0120.1524.43
Price / Sales0.553.13140.31109.73
Price / CashN/A22.9519.5755.64
Price / Book0.180.932.246.79
Net Income-$15.96M-$7.05M$1.14B$337.66M
7 Day Performance1.75%1.94%1.40%2.08%
1 Month Performance-16.75%-1.47%1.50%3.16%
1 Year Performance-91.30%3.83%11.50%27.78%

Safe and Green Development Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
RENX
Safe and Green Development
1.6213 of 5 stars
$1.74
-8.4%
N/A-90.8%$4.97M$8.22MN/A2
FTHM
Fathom
3.5837 of 5 stars
$0.45
-2.0%
$2.50
+455.6%
-67.7%$15.06M$420.48MN/A240
OMH
Ohmyhome
0.7039 of 5 stars
$0.72
+19.0%
N/A-54.0%$13.47M$9.20MN/A112
LHAI
Linkhome
0.9302 of 5 stars
$0.83
+2.2%
N/AN/A$13.15M$20.99MN/A4
AIRE
reAlpha Tech
3.2673 of 5 stars
$1.99
-1.5%
$50.00
+2,412.6%
-81.1%$10.84M$4.43MN/A7

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:RENX) was last updated on 6/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners