Free Trial
The Market Does Not Wait. MarketBeat All Access for Just $149
  • 0Days
  • 0Hours
  • 0Minutes
  • 0Seconds
Get the Deal
Claim MarketBeat All Access Sale Promotion

Safe and Green Development (RENX) Competitors

Safe and Green Development logo
$1.55 -0.07 (-4.32%)
As of 05/22/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

RENX vs. LHAI, AIRE, CWD, LRHC, and UOKA

Should you buy Safe and Green Development stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Safe and Green Development with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Safe and Green Development include Linkhome (LHAI), reAlpha Tech (AIRE), CaliberCos (CWD), La Rosa (LRHC), and MDJM (UOKA). These companies are all part of the "real estate" industry.

How does Safe and Green Development compare to Linkhome?

Safe and Green Development (NASDAQ:RENX) and Linkhome (NASDAQ:LHAI) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, earnings, risk, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Linkhome has a net margin of -2.21% compared to Safe and Green Development's net margin of -190.02%. Linkhome's return on equity of -7.17% beat Safe and Green Development's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Safe and Green Development-190.02% -596.53% -48.10%
Linkhome -2.21%-7.17%-5.87%

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Safe and Green Development
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Linkhome
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

2.6% of Safe and Green Development shares are owned by institutional investors. 61.2% of Safe and Green Development shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Linkhome has higher revenue and earnings than Safe and Green Development. Linkhome is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Safe and Green Development, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Safe and Green Development$8.22M0.49-$15.96M-$70.34N/A
Linkhome$20.99M0.70$70K-$0.02N/A

In the previous week, Safe and Green Development had 1 more articles in the media than Linkhome. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Safe and Green Development and 1 mentions for Linkhome. Safe and Green Development's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Linkhome'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Safe and Green Development
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Linkhome
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Linkhome beats Safe and Green Development on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Safe and Green Development compare to reAlpha Tech?

reAlpha Tech (NASDAQ:AIRE) and Safe and Green Development (NASDAQ:RENX) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, valuation, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and institutional ownership.

reAlpha Tech has a beta of -2.97, suggesting that its stock price is 397% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Safe and Green Development has a beta of 4.61, suggesting that its stock price is 361% more volatile than the broader market.

Safe and Green Development has higher revenue and earnings than reAlpha Tech. reAlpha Tech is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Safe and Green Development, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
reAlpha Tech$4.43M2.95-$17.59M-$4.75N/A
Safe and Green Development$8.22M0.49-$15.96M-$70.34N/A

Safe and Green Development has a net margin of -190.02% compared to reAlpha Tech's net margin of -430.43%. reAlpha Tech's return on equity of -258.24% beat Safe and Green Development's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
reAlpha Tech-430.43% -258.24% -102.31%
Safe and Green Development -190.02%-596.53%-48.10%

In the previous week, Safe and Green Development had 1 more articles in the media than reAlpha Tech. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Safe and Green Development and 1 mentions for reAlpha Tech. Safe and Green Development's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat reAlpha Tech's score of -0.59 indicating that Safe and Green Development is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
reAlpha Tech
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative
Safe and Green Development
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

1.0% of reAlpha Tech shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.6% of Safe and Green Development shares are owned by institutional investors. 39.6% of reAlpha Tech shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 61.2% of Safe and Green Development shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

reAlpha Tech currently has a consensus price target of $50.00, indicating a potential upside of 1,949.18%. Given reAlpha Tech's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe reAlpha Tech is more favorable than Safe and Green Development.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
reAlpha Tech
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Safe and Green Development
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Summary

Safe and Green Development beats reAlpha Tech on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Safe and Green Development compare to CaliberCos?

CaliberCos (NASDAQ:CWD) and Safe and Green Development (NASDAQ:RENX) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, earnings and institutional ownership.

Safe and Green Development has lower revenue, but higher earnings than CaliberCos. CaliberCos is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Safe and Green Development, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CaliberCos$20.10M0.42-$21.80M-$7.56N/A
Safe and Green Development$8.22M0.49-$15.96M-$70.34N/A

CaliberCos has a beta of -0.28, suggesting that its stock price is 128% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Safe and Green Development has a beta of 4.61, suggesting that its stock price is 361% more volatile than the broader market.

4.1% of CaliberCos shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.6% of Safe and Green Development shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.3% of CaliberCos shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 61.2% of Safe and Green Development shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

CaliberCos has a net margin of -122.65% compared to Safe and Green Development's net margin of -190.02%. CaliberCos' return on equity of -160.62% beat Safe and Green Development's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CaliberCos-122.65% -160.62% -18.79%
Safe and Green Development -190.02%-596.53%-48.10%

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CaliberCos
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
Safe and Green Development
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

In the previous week, CaliberCos and CaliberCos both had 2 articles in the media. CaliberCos' average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Safe and Green Development's score of 0.00 indicating that CaliberCos is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
CaliberCos
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Safe and Green Development
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

CaliberCos beats Safe and Green Development on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Safe and Green Development compare to La Rosa?

Safe and Green Development (NASDAQ:RENX) and La Rosa (NASDAQ:LRHC) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and media sentiment.

In the previous week, La Rosa had 1 more articles in the media than Safe and Green Development. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for La Rosa and 2 mentions for Safe and Green Development. La Rosa's average media sentiment score of 0.25 beat Safe and Green Development's score of 0.00 indicating that La Rosa is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Safe and Green Development
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
La Rosa
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Safe and Green Development has a beta of 4.61, meaning that its stock price is 361% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, La Rosa has a beta of 1.55, meaning that its stock price is 55% more volatile than the broader market.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Safe and Green Development
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
La Rosa
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

La Rosa has higher revenue and earnings than Safe and Green Development. Safe and Green Development is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than La Rosa, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Safe and Green Development$8.22M0.49-$15.96M-$70.34N/A
La Rosa$69.45M0.00-$14.45M-$46.62 thousandN/A

2.6% of Safe and Green Development shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.6% of La Rosa shares are owned by institutional investors. 61.2% of Safe and Green Development shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 23.8% of La Rosa shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

La Rosa has a net margin of -35.59% compared to Safe and Green Development's net margin of -190.02%. La Rosa's return on equity of 0.00% beat Safe and Green Development's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Safe and Green Development-190.02% -596.53% -48.10%
La Rosa -35.59%N/A -91.73%

Summary

La Rosa beats Safe and Green Development on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Safe and Green Development compare to MDJM?

MDJM (NASDAQ:UOKA) and Safe and Green Development (NASDAQ:RENX) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and risk.

In the previous week, Safe and Green Development had 2 more articles in the media than MDJM. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Safe and Green Development and 0 mentions for MDJM. MDJM's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Safe and Green Development'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
MDJM Neutral
Safe and Green Development Neutral

2.6% of Safe and Green Development shares are held by institutional investors. 87.6% of MDJM shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 61.2% of Safe and Green Development shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

MDJM has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Safe and Green Development.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MDJM$59.96K0.21-$3.19MN/AN/A
Safe and Green Development$8.22M0.49-$15.96M-$70.34N/A

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
MDJM
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Safe and Green Development
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

MDJM has a beta of -0.79, meaning that its stock price is 179% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Safe and Green Development has a beta of 4.61, meaning that its stock price is 361% more volatile than the broader market.

MDJM has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Safe and Green Development's net margin of -190.02%. MDJM's return on equity of 0.00% beat Safe and Green Development's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
MDJMN/A N/A N/A
Safe and Green Development -190.02%-596.53%-48.10%

Summary

MDJM and Safe and Green Development tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Safe and Green Development News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for RENX and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding RENX and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

RENX vs. The Competition

MetricSafe and Green DevelopmentREAL ESTATE DEV IndustryFinance SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$4.23M$3.23B$13.57B$12.31B
Dividend YieldN/A6.08%5.82%5.31%
P/E Ratio-0.028.4723.9525.66
Price / Sales0.493.08150.6283.75
Price / CashN/A23.2720.2856.72
Price / Book3.301.052.157.14
Net Income-$15.96M-$7.05M$1.13B$335.72M
7 Day Performance-25.48%0.48%0.88%3.03%
1 Month Performance-42.80%-4.96%0.00%2.88%
1 Year Performance-91.39%12.92%12.02%35.20%

Safe and Green Development Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
RENX
Safe and Green Development
0.6052 of 5 stars
$1.55
-4.3%
N/A-91.1%$4.23M$8.22MN/A2
LHAI
Linkhome
0.0993 of 5 stars
$0.96
+8.1%
N/AN/A$14.41M$20.19MN/A4
AIRE
reAlpha Tech
2.5629 of 5 stars
$2.16
+8.5%
$50.00
+2,214.8%
-81.5%$10.68M$4.52MN/A7
CWD
CaliberCos
1.4436 of 5 stars
$1.02
flat
N/A-68.5%$8.64M$20.10MN/A74
LRHC
La Rosa
1.0708 of 5 stars
$1.36
+1.5%
N/A-99.9%$20K$69.45MN/A42

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:RENX) was last updated on 5/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners