Go Pro
→ The REAL Reason Trump is Invading Iran (From Banyan Hill Publishing) (Ad)tc pixel Free RENX Stock Alerts

Safe and Green Development (RENX) Competitors

Safe and Green Development logo
$1.81 +0.06 (+3.43%)
As of 04:00 PM Eastern
Compare

RENX vs. ZDAI, AWX, AQMS, CDTG, and DXST

Should you buy Safe and Green Development stock or one of its competitors? Safe and Green Development's main competitors and comparable companies include DirectBooking Technology (ZDAI), Avalon (AWX), Aqua Metals (AQMS), CDT Environmental Technology Investment (CDTG), and Decent (DXST). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "environmental & facilities services" industry.

How does Safe and Green Development compare to DirectBooking Technology?

DirectBooking Technology (NASDAQ:ZDAI) and Safe and Green Development (NASDAQ:RENX) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, earnings and profitability.

2.6% of Safe and Green Development shares are held by institutional investors. 16.9% of Safe and Green Development shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

DirectBooking Technology has higher revenue and earnings than Safe and Green Development.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
DirectBooking Technology$8.94M1.52-$13.29MN/AN/A
Safe and Green Development$8.22M0.58-$15.96M-$27.62N/A

DirectBooking Technology has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Safe and Green Development's net margin of -169.20%. DirectBooking Technology's return on equity of 0.00% beat Safe and Green Development's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
DirectBooking TechnologyN/A N/A N/A
Safe and Green Development -169.20%-550.70%-54.41%

In the previous week, Safe and Green Development had 1 more articles in the media than DirectBooking Technology. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Safe and Green Development and 0 mentions for DirectBooking Technology. DirectBooking Technology's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Safe and Green Development'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
DirectBooking Technology Neutral
Safe and Green Development Neutral

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
DirectBooking Technology
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Safe and Green Development
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50

DirectBooking Technology has a beta of 2.35, indicating that its stock price is 135% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Safe and Green Development has a beta of 3.96, indicating that its stock price is 296% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

DirectBooking Technology beats Safe and Green Development on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Safe and Green Development compare to Avalon?

Avalon (NYSE:AWX) and Safe and Green Development (NASDAQ:RENX) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings and profitability.

34.4% of Avalon shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.6% of Safe and Green Development shares are owned by institutional investors. 20.0% of Avalon shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 16.9% of Safe and Green Development shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Avalon
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Safe and Green Development
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50

In the previous week, Avalon had 2 more articles in the media than Safe and Green Development. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Avalon and 1 mentions for Safe and Green Development. Avalon's average media sentiment score of 1.96 beat Safe and Green Development's score of 0.00 indicating that Avalon is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Avalon
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Safe and Green Development
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Avalon has a net margin of 1.17% compared to Safe and Green Development's net margin of -169.20%. Avalon's return on equity of 2.72% beat Safe and Green Development's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Avalon1.17% 2.72% 1.10%
Safe and Green Development -169.20%-550.70%-54.41%

Avalon has higher revenue and earnings than Safe and Green Development. Safe and Green Development is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Avalon, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Avalon$85.78M0.12-$1.77M$0.318.48
Safe and Green Development$8.22M0.58-$15.96M-$27.62N/A

Avalon has a beta of 0.63, meaning that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Safe and Green Development has a beta of 3.96, meaning that its stock price is 296% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Avalon beats Safe and Green Development on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Safe and Green Development compare to Aqua Metals?

Aqua Metals (NASDAQ:AQMS) and Safe and Green Development (NASDAQ:RENX) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, dividends and valuation.

Aqua Metals has a beta of 0.33, suggesting that its stock price is 67% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Safe and Green Development has a beta of 3.96, suggesting that its stock price is 296% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Aqua Metals and Aqua Metals both had 1 articles in the media. Aqua Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.10 beat Safe and Green Development's score of 0.00 indicating that Aqua Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Aqua Metals
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Safe and Green Development
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Safe and Green Development has higher revenue and earnings than Aqua Metals. Aqua Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Safe and Green Development, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Aqua MetalsN/AN/A-$22.65M-$4.72N/A
Safe and Green Development$8.22M0.58-$15.96M-$27.62N/A

Aqua Metals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Safe and Green Development's net margin of -169.20%. Aqua Metals' return on equity of -145.58% beat Safe and Green Development's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Aqua MetalsN/A -145.58% -106.72%
Safe and Green Development -169.20%-550.70%-54.41%

Aqua Metals currently has a consensus price target of $5.00, indicating a potential upside of 100.00%. Given Aqua Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Aqua Metals is more favorable than Safe and Green Development.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Aqua Metals
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Safe and Green Development
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50

22.0% of Aqua Metals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.6% of Safe and Green Development shares are held by institutional investors. 7.1% of Aqua Metals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 16.9% of Safe and Green Development shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Aqua Metals beats Safe and Green Development on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Safe and Green Development compare to CDT Environmental Technology Investment?

Safe and Green Development (NASDAQ:RENX) and CDT Environmental Technology Investment (NASDAQ:CDTG) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

CDT Environmental Technology Investment has higher revenue and earnings than Safe and Green Development.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Safe and Green Development$8.22M0.58-$15.96M-$27.62N/A
CDT Environmental Technology Investment$18.23M0.27-$10.20MN/AN/A

In the previous week, Safe and Green Development had 1 more articles in the media than CDT Environmental Technology Investment. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Safe and Green Development and 0 mentions for CDT Environmental Technology Investment. Safe and Green Development's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat CDT Environmental Technology Investment's score of -0.45 indicating that Safe and Green Development is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Safe and Green Development Neutral
CDT Environmental Technology Investment Neutral

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Safe and Green Development
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
CDT Environmental Technology Investment
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

CDT Environmental Technology Investment has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Safe and Green Development's net margin of -169.20%. CDT Environmental Technology Investment's return on equity of 0.00% beat Safe and Green Development's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Safe and Green Development-169.20% -550.70% -54.41%
CDT Environmental Technology Investment N/A N/A N/A

Safe and Green Development has a beta of 3.96, meaning that its share price is 296% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CDT Environmental Technology Investment has a beta of -1.86, meaning that its share price is 286% less volatile than the broader market.

2.6% of Safe and Green Development shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.9% of Safe and Green Development shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Safe and Green Development beats CDT Environmental Technology Investment on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Safe and Green Development compare to Decent?

Safe and Green Development (NASDAQ:RENX) and Decent (NASDAQ:DXST) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, earnings, valuation and media sentiment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Safe and Green Development
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
Decent
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Safe and Green Development has a beta of 3.96, suggesting that its share price is 296% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Decent has a beta of -0.02, suggesting that its share price is 102% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Decent had 2 more articles in the media than Safe and Green Development. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Decent and 1 mentions for Safe and Green Development. Decent's average media sentiment score of 0.32 beat Safe and Green Development's score of 0.00 indicating that Decent is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Safe and Green Development
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Decent
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Decent has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Safe and Green Development's net margin of -169.20%. Decent's return on equity of 0.00% beat Safe and Green Development's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Safe and Green Development-169.20% -550.70% -54.41%
Decent N/A N/A N/A

2.6% of Safe and Green Development shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.9% of Safe and Green Development shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Decent has higher revenue and earnings than Safe and Green Development.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Safe and Green Development$8.22M0.58-$15.96M-$27.62N/A
Decent$12.95M0.35-$320KN/AN/A

Summary

Decent beats Safe and Green Development on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Safe and Green Development News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for RENX and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding RENX and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

RENX vs. The Competition

Export
MetricSafe and Green DevelopmentCommercial Services & Supplies IndustryIndustrials SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$4.80M$4.04B$10.25B$13.10B
Dividend YieldN/A5.06%96.94%13.00%
P/E Ratio-0.0726.4725.5925.69
Price / Sales0.58795.62288.8185.88
Price / CashN/A21.4623.9752.02
Price / Book0.184.074.896.32
Net Income-$15.96M$145.77M$614.63M$359.73M
7 Day Performance11.73%-0.29%1.48%1.35%
1 Month Performance-6.22%-2.27%-2.84%-3.68%
1 Year Performance-93.39%0.60%4.01%5.56%

Safe and Green Development Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
RENX
Safe and Green Development
1.0946 of 5 stars		$1.81
+3.4%		N/A-93.1%$4.80M$8.22MN/A2
ZDAI
DirectBooking Technology
N/A$1.58
-4.2%		N/A-84.8%$13.84M$8.94MN/AN/A
AWX
Avalon
N/A$2.58
-0.8%		N/A+1.7%$10.06M$85.78M10.32610
AQMS
Aqua Metals
1.5849 of 5 stars		$2.26
+0.9%		$5.00
+121.2%		-38.8%$7.98M$30KN/A20
CDTG
CDT Environmental Technology Investment
0.296 of 5 stars		$1.20
-9.8%		N/A-94.0%$5.32M$18.23MN/A107

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:RENX) was last updated on 9/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid
A small Colorado company has secured rights to technology that could prevent the U.S. public power grid from c...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s Why Trump Won’t End The Iran War
Trump has called an Iran deal close 38 times since the war began, yet the fighting keeps flaring back up. O...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
These gold assets are priced for $1,800 gold [it's over $4,000]
Gold's major miners are generating record free cash flow, with margins as high as 75 percent even after gold's...
Golden Portfolio | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book is inside
The "Sucker's Bet" Most New Options Traders Fall For Most people who try options lose money the same way. ...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel