Go Pro

Safe and Green Development (RENX) Competitors

Safe and Green Development logo
$2.00 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 07/2/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

RENX vs. OMH, LHAI, AIRE, CWD, and LRHC

Should you buy Safe and Green Development stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Safe and Green Development with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Safe and Green Development include Ohmyhome (OMH), Linkhome (LHAI), reAlpha Tech (AIRE), CaliberCos (CWD), and La Rosa (LRHC). These companies are all part of the "real estate" industry.

How does Safe and Green Development compare to Ohmyhome?

Safe and Green Development (NASDAQ:RENX) and Ohmyhome (NASDAQ:OMH) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, dividends and institutional ownership.

Ohmyhome has higher revenue and earnings than Safe and Green Development.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Safe and Green Development$8.22M0.64-$15.96M-$70.34N/A
Ohmyhome$9.20M1.24-$7.16MN/AN/A

Safe and Green Development has a beta of 4.01, meaning that its stock price is 301% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ohmyhome has a beta of -0.52, meaning that its stock price is 152% less volatile than the broader market.

2.6% of Safe and Green Development shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.7% of Ohmyhome shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.9% of Safe and Green Development shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Ohmyhome had 1 more articles in the media than Safe and Green Development. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Ohmyhome and 1 mentions for Safe and Green Development. Ohmyhome's average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat Safe and Green Development's score of -0.41 indicating that Ohmyhome is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Safe and Green Development
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Ohmyhome
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Safe and Green Development
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Ohmyhome
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Ohmyhome has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Safe and Green Development's net margin of -190.02%. Ohmyhome's return on equity of 0.00% beat Safe and Green Development's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Safe and Green Development-190.02% -596.53% -48.10%
Ohmyhome N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Ohmyhome beats Safe and Green Development on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Safe and Green Development compare to Linkhome?

Safe and Green Development (NASDAQ:RENX) and Linkhome (NASDAQ:LHAI) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, risk and valuation.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Safe and Green Development
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Linkhome
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

In the previous week, Linkhome had 9 more articles in the media than Safe and Green Development. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Linkhome and 1 mentions for Safe and Green Development. Linkhome's average media sentiment score of 0.07 beat Safe and Green Development's score of -0.41 indicating that Linkhome is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Safe and Green Development
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Linkhome
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
9 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Linkhome has higher revenue and earnings than Safe and Green Development. Linkhome is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Safe and Green Development, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Safe and Green Development$8.22M0.64-$15.96M-$70.34N/A
Linkhome$20.99M1.36$70K-$0.02N/A

Linkhome has a net margin of -2.21% compared to Safe and Green Development's net margin of -190.02%. Linkhome's return on equity of -7.17% beat Safe and Green Development's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Safe and Green Development-190.02% -596.53% -48.10%
Linkhome -2.21%-7.17%-5.87%

2.6% of Safe and Green Development shares are held by institutional investors. 16.9% of Safe and Green Development shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 31.2% of Linkhome shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Linkhome beats Safe and Green Development on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Safe and Green Development compare to reAlpha Tech?

Safe and Green Development (NASDAQ:RENX) and reAlpha Tech (NASDAQ:AIRE) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings, dividends and valuation.

Safe and Green Development has a beta of 4.01, suggesting that its share price is 301% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, reAlpha Tech has a beta of -2.81, suggesting that its share price is 381% less volatile than the broader market.

reAlpha Tech has a consensus price target of $50.00, indicating a potential upside of 2,559.57%. Given reAlpha Tech's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe reAlpha Tech is more favorable than Safe and Green Development.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Safe and Green Development
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
reAlpha Tech
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Safe and Green Development has higher revenue and earnings than reAlpha Tech. reAlpha Tech is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Safe and Green Development, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Safe and Green Development$8.22M0.64-$15.96M-$70.34N/A
reAlpha Tech$4.52M2.23-$17.59M-$4.75N/A

Safe and Green Development has a net margin of -190.02% compared to reAlpha Tech's net margin of -430.43%. reAlpha Tech's return on equity of -258.24% beat Safe and Green Development's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Safe and Green Development-190.02% -596.53% -48.10%
reAlpha Tech -430.43%-258.24%-102.31%

2.6% of Safe and Green Development shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.0% of reAlpha Tech shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.9% of Safe and Green Development shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 39.6% of reAlpha Tech shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Safe and Green Development had 1 more articles in the media than reAlpha Tech. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Safe and Green Development and 0 mentions for reAlpha Tech. reAlpha Tech's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Safe and Green Development's score of -0.41 indicating that reAlpha Tech is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Safe and Green Development Neutral
reAlpha Tech Neutral

Summary

Safe and Green Development and reAlpha Tech tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Safe and Green Development compare to CaliberCos?

Safe and Green Development (NASDAQ:RENX) and CaliberCos (NASDAQ:CWD) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, dividends, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, profitability and analyst recommendations.

CaliberCos has a net margin of -122.65% compared to Safe and Green Development's net margin of -190.02%. CaliberCos' return on equity of -160.62% beat Safe and Green Development's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Safe and Green Development-190.02% -596.53% -48.10%
CaliberCos -122.65%-160.62%-18.79%

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Safe and Green Development
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
CaliberCos
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50

2.6% of Safe and Green Development shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.1% of CaliberCos shares are held by institutional investors. 16.9% of Safe and Green Development shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 8.3% of CaliberCos shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Safe and Green Development has higher earnings, but lower revenue than CaliberCos. CaliberCos is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Safe and Green Development, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Safe and Green Development$8.22M0.64-$15.96M-$70.34N/A
CaliberCos$20.10M0.52-$21.80M-$7.56N/A

In the previous week, CaliberCos had 6 more articles in the media than Safe and Green Development. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for CaliberCos and 1 mentions for Safe and Green Development. CaliberCos' average media sentiment score of 0.31 beat Safe and Green Development's score of -0.41 indicating that CaliberCos is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Safe and Green Development
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
CaliberCos
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Safe and Green Development has a beta of 4.01, indicating that its share price is 301% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CaliberCos has a beta of -0.1, indicating that its share price is 110% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

CaliberCos beats Safe and Green Development on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Safe and Green Development compare to La Rosa?

La Rosa (NASDAQ:LRHC) and Safe and Green Development (NASDAQ:RENX) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, profitability, valuation and risk.

In the previous week, La Rosa and La Rosa both had 1 articles in the media. La Rosa's average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat Safe and Green Development's score of -0.41 indicating that La Rosa is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
La Rosa
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Safe and Green Development
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

7.6% of La Rosa shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.6% of Safe and Green Development shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.8% of La Rosa shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 16.9% of Safe and Green Development shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

La Rosa has a beta of 1.35, indicating that its share price is 35% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Safe and Green Development has a beta of 4.01, indicating that its share price is 301% more volatile than the broader market.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
La Rosa
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Safe and Green Development
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Safe and Green Development has lower revenue, but higher earnings than La Rosa. Safe and Green Development is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than La Rosa, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
La Rosa$68.51M0.02-$30.55M-$46.62 thousandN/A
Safe and Green Development$8.22M0.64-$15.96M-$70.34N/A

La Rosa has a net margin of -44.72% compared to Safe and Green Development's net margin of -190.02%. La Rosa's return on equity of 0.00% beat Safe and Green Development's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
La Rosa-44.72% N/A -111.56%
Safe and Green Development -190.02%-596.53%-48.10%

Summary

La Rosa beats Safe and Green Development on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Safe and Green Development News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for RENX and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding RENX and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

RENX vs. The Competition

MetricSafe and Green DevelopmentREAL ESTATE DEV IndustryFinance SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$5.23M$3.18B$14.06B$12.47B
Dividend YieldN/A6.12%5.67%6.49%
P/E Ratio-0.039.6120.6024.70
Price / Sales0.643.0642.9898.64
Price / CashN/A26.4219.4557.09
Price / Book0.200.932.276.46
Net Income-$15.96M-$9.74M$1.14B$337.01M
7 Day Performance10.50%-0.75%0.66%1.70%
1 Month Performance14.29%7.70%2.07%0.68%
1 Year Performance-87.83%6.16%12.07%23.93%

Safe and Green Development Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
RENX
Safe and Green Development
1.0063 of 5 stars
$2.00
flat
N/A-87.8%$5.23M$8.22MN/A2
OMH
Ohmyhome
0.3287 of 5 stars
$0.48
-2.0%
N/A-64.4%$10.91M$9.20MN/A112
LHAI
Linkhome
0.9178 of 5 stars
$2.74
+315.2%
N/AN/A$10.71M$20.99MN/A4
AIRE
reAlpha Tech
1.784 of 5 stars
$1.98
+2.6%
$50.00
+2,425.3%
-72.3%$10.35M$4.52MN/A7
CWD
CaliberCos
1.1154 of 5 stars
$0.65
-1.5%
N/A-64.9%$5.55M$20.10MN/A74

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:RENX) was last updated on 7/4/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners