Go Pro
→ Have you seen Elon’s new “supercurrency”? (It affects you) (From StocksToTrade) (Ad)tc pixel Free RENX Stock Alerts

Safe and Green Development (RENX) Competitors

Safe and Green Development logo
$2.00 +0.05 (+2.56%)
As of 04:00 PM Eastern
Compare

RENX vs. OMH, LHAI, RITR, AIRE, and CWD

Should you buy Safe and Green Development stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Safe and Green Development with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Safe and Green Development include Ohmyhome (OMH), Linkhome (LHAI), Reitar Logtech (RITR), reAlpha Tech (AIRE), and CaliberCos (CWD). These companies are all part of the "real estate" industry.

How does Safe and Green Development compare to Ohmyhome?

Ohmyhome (NASDAQ:OMH) and Safe and Green Development (NASDAQ:RENX) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership and valuation.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ohmyhome
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Safe and Green Development
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Ohmyhome has a beta of -0.52, indicating that its stock price is 152% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Safe and Green Development has a beta of 4.01, indicating that its stock price is 301% more volatile than the broader market.

Ohmyhome has higher revenue and earnings than Safe and Green Development.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ohmyhome$9.20M1.22-$7.16MN/AN/A
Safe and Green Development$8.22M0.64-$15.96M-$70.34N/A

Ohmyhome has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Safe and Green Development's net margin of -190.02%. Ohmyhome's return on equity of 0.00% beat Safe and Green Development's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
OhmyhomeN/A N/A N/A
Safe and Green Development -190.02%-596.53%-48.10%

In the previous week, Ohmyhome had 27 more articles in the media than Safe and Green Development. MarketBeat recorded 28 mentions for Ohmyhome and 1 mentions for Safe and Green Development. Safe and Green Development's average media sentiment score of 1.90 beat Ohmyhome's score of 0.04 indicating that Safe and Green Development is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ohmyhome Neutral
Safe and Green Development Very Positive

0.7% of Ohmyhome shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.6% of Safe and Green Development shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.9% of Safe and Green Development shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Ohmyhome beats Safe and Green Development on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Safe and Green Development compare to Linkhome?

Linkhome (NASDAQ:LHAI) and Safe and Green Development (NASDAQ:RENX) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk and institutional ownership.

Linkhome has higher revenue and earnings than Safe and Green Development. Linkhome is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Safe and Green Development, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Linkhome$20.99M0.70$70K-$0.02N/A
Safe and Green Development$8.22M0.64-$15.96M-$70.34N/A

In the previous week, Linkhome had 2 more articles in the media than Safe and Green Development. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Linkhome and 1 mentions for Safe and Green Development. Safe and Green Development's average media sentiment score of 1.90 beat Linkhome's score of 0.41 indicating that Safe and Green Development is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Linkhome Neutral
Safe and Green Development Very Positive

Linkhome has a net margin of -2.21% compared to Safe and Green Development's net margin of -190.02%. Linkhome's return on equity of -7.17% beat Safe and Green Development's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Linkhome-2.21% -7.17% -5.87%
Safe and Green Development -190.02%-596.53%-48.10%

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Linkhome
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Safe and Green Development
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

2.6% of Safe and Green Development shares are owned by institutional investors. 31.2% of Linkhome shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 16.9% of Safe and Green Development shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Linkhome beats Safe and Green Development on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Safe and Green Development compare to Reitar Logtech?

Safe and Green Development (NASDAQ:RENX) and Reitar Logtech (NASDAQ:RITR) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends and earnings.

2.6% of Safe and Green Development shares are held by institutional investors. 16.9% of Safe and Green Development shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Safe and Green Development
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Reitar Logtech
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Reitar Logtech has higher revenue and earnings than Safe and Green Development.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Safe and Green Development$8.22M0.64-$15.96M-$70.34N/A
Reitar Logtech$48.61M0.14$1.01MN/AN/A

Safe and Green Development has a beta of 4.01, meaning that its stock price is 301% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Reitar Logtech has a beta of 0.24, meaning that its stock price is 76% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Reitar Logtech had 1 more articles in the media than Safe and Green Development. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Reitar Logtech and 1 mentions for Safe and Green Development. Safe and Green Development's average media sentiment score of 1.90 beat Reitar Logtech's score of 0.44 indicating that Safe and Green Development is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Safe and Green Development Very Positive
Reitar Logtech Neutral

Reitar Logtech has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Safe and Green Development's net margin of -190.02%. Reitar Logtech's return on equity of 0.00% beat Safe and Green Development's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Safe and Green Development-190.02% -596.53% -48.10%
Reitar Logtech N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Reitar Logtech beats Safe and Green Development on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Safe and Green Development compare to reAlpha Tech?

Safe and Green Development (NASDAQ:RENX) and reAlpha Tech (NASDAQ:AIRE) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Safe and Green Development has a beta of 4.01, meaning that its share price is 301% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, reAlpha Tech has a beta of -2.81, meaning that its share price is 381% less volatile than the broader market.

2.6% of Safe and Green Development shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.0% of reAlpha Tech shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.9% of Safe and Green Development shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 39.6% of reAlpha Tech shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, reAlpha Tech had 3 more articles in the media than Safe and Green Development. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for reAlpha Tech and 1 mentions for Safe and Green Development. Safe and Green Development's average media sentiment score of 1.90 beat reAlpha Tech's score of 1.14 indicating that Safe and Green Development is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Safe and Green Development Very Positive
reAlpha Tech Positive

reAlpha Tech has a consensus price target of $50.00, indicating a potential upside of 3,523.19%. Given reAlpha Tech's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe reAlpha Tech is more favorable than Safe and Green Development.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Safe and Green Development
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
reAlpha Tech
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Safe and Green Development has a net margin of -190.02% compared to reAlpha Tech's net margin of -430.43%. reAlpha Tech's return on equity of -258.24% beat Safe and Green Development's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Safe and Green Development-190.02% -596.53% -48.10%
reAlpha Tech -430.43%-258.24%-102.31%

Safe and Green Development has higher revenue and earnings than reAlpha Tech. reAlpha Tech is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Safe and Green Development, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Safe and Green Development$8.22M0.64-$15.96M-$70.34N/A
reAlpha Tech$4.52M1.64-$17.59M-$4.75N/A

Summary

Safe and Green Development and reAlpha Tech tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Safe and Green Development compare to CaliberCos?

Safe and Green Development (NASDAQ:RENX) and CaliberCos (NASDAQ:CWD) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment and risk.

In the previous week, CaliberCos had 1 more articles in the media than Safe and Green Development. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for CaliberCos and 1 mentions for Safe and Green Development. Safe and Green Development's average media sentiment score of 1.90 beat CaliberCos' score of -0.05 indicating that Safe and Green Development is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Safe and Green Development Very Positive
CaliberCos Neutral

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Safe and Green Development
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
CaliberCos
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50

Safe and Green Development has a beta of 4.01, meaning that its share price is 301% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CaliberCos has a beta of -0.1, meaning that its share price is 110% less volatile than the broader market.

2.6% of Safe and Green Development shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.1% of CaliberCos shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.9% of Safe and Green Development shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.3% of CaliberCos shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

CaliberCos has a net margin of -122.65% compared to Safe and Green Development's net margin of -190.02%. CaliberCos' return on equity of -160.62% beat Safe and Green Development's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Safe and Green Development-190.02% -596.53% -48.10%
CaliberCos -122.65%-160.62%-18.79%

Safe and Green Development has higher earnings, but lower revenue than CaliberCos. CaliberCos is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Safe and Green Development, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Safe and Green Development$8.22M0.64-$15.96M-$70.34N/A
CaliberCos$20.10M0.24-$21.80M-$7.56N/A

Summary

CaliberCos beats Safe and Green Development on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Safe and Green Development News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for RENX and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding RENX and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

RENX vs. The Competition

Export
MetricSafe and Green DevelopmentREAL ESTATE DEV IndustryFinance SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$5.10M$3.14B$14.32B$12.27B
Dividend YieldN/A6.39%5.73%9.80%
P/E Ratio-0.038.1321.6121.56
Price / Sales0.642.8045.0490.80
Price / CashN/A23.2919.2159.64
Price / Book0.200.902.256.07
Net Income-$15.96M-$9.74M$1.14B$331.84M
7 Day Performance1.01%-1.62%-0.36%-1.50%
1 Month Performance20.48%9.03%1.16%-2.99%
1 Year Performance-89.04%-0.11%11.70%13.54%

Safe and Green Development Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
RENX
Safe and Green Development
1.537 of 5 stars		$2.00
+2.6%		N/A-89.1%$5.10M$8.22MN/A2
OMH
Ohmyhome
0.3407 of 5 stars		$0.36
-55.2%		N/A-70.3%$17.94M$9.20MN/A112
LHAI
Linkhome
0.3409 of 5 stars		$0.98
-5.8%		N/AN/A$16.88M$20.99MN/A4
RITR
Reitar Logtech
0.2746 of 5 stars		$0.14
-8.4%		N/A-96.8%$9.59M$48.61MN/A53
AIRE
reAlpha Tech
2.2044 of 5 stars		$1.27
-8.0%		$50.00
+3,837.0%		-82.5%$7.40M$4.52MN/A7

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:RENX) was last updated on 7/24/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
The number they’re trying to hide from you
The 10-year Treasury yield is nearing 4.4 percent, a level analyst Garrett Goggin says could force the Federal...
Golden Portfolio | Sponsoredtc pixel
Elon says “don’t save money.” Is he right?
Robert Kiyosaki, author of Rich Dad Poor Dad, says you don't have to wait for Elon Musk's vision of universal ...
Freedom Financial | Sponsoredtc pixel
Have you seen Elon’s new “supercurrency”? (It affects you)
Elon Musk just became the world's first trillionaire following the biggest IPO in history, giving him access t...
StocksToTrade | Sponsoredtc pixel
BofA: Digital Dollar Coming 2025-2030
Bank of America just revealed your expiration date. In their Bloomberg interview, they didn't just predict the...
Decentralized Masters | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s Why Trump Won’t End The Iran War
Trump has called an Iran deal close 38 times since the war began, yet the fighting keeps flaring back up. O...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
This tiny piece of glass could be bigger than GPUs
A tiny glass device smaller than a fingertip could redefine AI hardware. Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang calls it esse...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
The market told you. In writing. Early.
Some trading losses are surprises. Others are scheduled months, even a year, in advance and published for free...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel