Which has higher earnings & valuation, RGP or CARS?

Cars.com has higher revenue and earnings than Resources Connection. Resources Connection is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cars.com, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Resources Connection $551.33M 0.28 -$191.78M -$2.96 N/A Cars.com $723.24M 0.79 $20.05M $0.43 23.92

Resources Connection (RGP) Competitors

$4.52 +0.18 (+4.15%)

Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$4.53 +0.01 (+0.11%)

As of 05:40 PM Eastern

Compare

RGP vs. PHR, CARS, BWMN, OOMA, and NRDS

Should you buy Resources Connection stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Resources Connection with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Resources Connection include Phreesia (PHR), Cars.com (CARS), Bowman Consulting Group (BWMN), Ooma (OOMA), and NerdWallet (NRDS). These companies are all part of the "business services" industry.

How does Resources Connection compare to Phreesia?

Resources Connection (NASDAQ:RGP) and Phreesia (NYSE:PHR) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, profitability, risk and analyst recommendations.

Phreesia has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Resources Connection. Resources Connection is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Phreesia, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Resources Connection	$551.33M	0.28	-$191.78M	-$2.96	N/A
Phreesia	$480.59M	1.26	$2.31M	$0.03	326.63

In the previous week, Phreesia had 40 more articles in the media than Resources Connection. MarketBeat recorded 41 mentions for Phreesia and 1 mentions for Resources Connection. Resources Connection's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Phreesia's score of 0.14 indicating that Resources Connection is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Resources Connection	Very Positive
Phreesia	Neutral

93.2% of Resources Connection shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.1% of Phreesia shares are held by institutional investors. 7.9% of Resources Connection shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.2% of Phreesia shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Resources Connection currently has a consensus target price of $7.00, suggesting a potential upside of 54.87%. Phreesia has a consensus target price of $16.65, suggesting a potential upside of 69.89%. Given Phreesia's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Phreesia is more favorable than Resources Connection.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Resources Connection	2 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Phreesia	1 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.42

Resources Connection has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Phreesia has a beta of 0.89, indicating that its share price is 11% less volatile than the broader market.

Phreesia has a net margin of 1.85% compared to Resources Connection's net margin of -20.16%. Phreesia's return on equity of 5.30% beat Resources Connection's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Resources Connection	-20.16%	-0.55%	-0.38%
Phreesia	1.85%	5.30%	3.38%

Summary

Phreesia beats Resources Connection on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Resources Connection compare to Cars.com?

Resources Connection (NASDAQ:RGP) and Cars.com (NYSE:CARS) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, profitability, valuation, risk, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

93.2% of Resources Connection shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.2% of Cars.com shares are held by institutional investors. 7.9% of Resources Connection shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.4% of Cars.com shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Cars.com has a net margin of 3.73% compared to Resources Connection's net margin of -20.16%. Cars.com's return on equity of 18.12% beat Resources Connection's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Resources Connection	-20.16%	-0.55%	-0.38%
Cars.com	3.73%	18.12%	8.07%

Resources Connection presently has a consensus price target of $7.00, suggesting a potential upside of 54.87%. Cars.com has a consensus price target of $14.67, suggesting a potential upside of 42.60%. Given Resources Connection's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Resources Connection is more favorable than Cars.com.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Resources Connection	2 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Cars.com	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Resources Connection has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cars.com has a beta of 1.64, indicating that its share price is 64% more volatile than the broader market.

Cars.com has higher revenue and earnings than Resources Connection. Resources Connection is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cars.com, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Resources Connection	$551.33M	0.28	-$191.78M	-$2.96	N/A
Cars.com	$723.24M	0.79	$20.05M	$0.43	23.92

In the previous week, Resources Connection had 1 more articles in the media than Cars.com. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Resources Connection and 0 mentions for Cars.com. Resources Connection's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Cars.com's score of 0.00 indicating that Resources Connection is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Resources Connection	Very Positive
Cars.com	Neutral

Summary

Cars.com beats Resources Connection on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Resources Connection compare to Bowman Consulting Group?

Bowman Consulting Group (NASDAQ:BWMN) and Resources Connection (NASDAQ:RGP) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Bowman Consulting Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Resources Connection. Resources Connection is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bowman Consulting Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Bowman Consulting Group	$490.02M	1.13	$12.85M	$0.60	52.55
Resources Connection	$551.33M	0.28	-$191.78M	-$2.96	N/A

In the previous week, Bowman Consulting Group had 1 more articles in the media than Resources Connection. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Bowman Consulting Group and 1 mentions for Resources Connection. Resources Connection's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Bowman Consulting Group's score of 1.23 indicating that Resources Connection is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Bowman Consulting Group	Positive
Resources Connection	Very Positive

Bowman Consulting Group has a beta of 1.36, indicating that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Resources Connection has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

Bowman Consulting Group presently has a consensus target price of $47.50, suggesting a potential upside of 50.65%. Resources Connection has a consensus target price of $7.00, suggesting a potential upside of 54.87%. Given Resources Connection's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Resources Connection is more favorable than Bowman Consulting Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Bowman Consulting Group	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
Resources Connection	2 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

63.2% of Bowman Consulting Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.2% of Resources Connection shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.5% of Bowman Consulting Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.9% of Resources Connection shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Bowman Consulting Group has a net margin of 2.02% compared to Resources Connection's net margin of -20.16%. Bowman Consulting Group's return on equity of 3.98% beat Resources Connection's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Bowman Consulting Group	2.02%	3.98%	1.84%
Resources Connection	-20.16%	-0.55%	-0.38%

Summary

Bowman Consulting Group beats Resources Connection on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Resources Connection compare to Ooma?

Ooma (NYSE:OOMA) and Resources Connection (NASDAQ:RGP) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership and risk.

80.4% of Ooma shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.2% of Resources Connection shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.9% of Ooma shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.9% of Resources Connection shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Ooma has a net margin of 3.17% compared to Resources Connection's net margin of -20.16%. Ooma's return on equity of 20.52% beat Resources Connection's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ooma	3.17%	20.52%	10.49%
Resources Connection	-20.16%	-0.55%	-0.38%

Ooma has a beta of 1.2, meaning that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Resources Connection has a beta of 0.52, meaning that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

Ooma currently has a consensus price target of $22.33, suggesting a potential upside of 26.31%. Resources Connection has a consensus price target of $7.00, suggesting a potential upside of 54.87%. Given Resources Connection's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Resources Connection is more favorable than Ooma.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ooma	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Resources Connection	2 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Ooma has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Resources Connection. Resources Connection is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ooma, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ooma	$273.60M	1.78	$6.46M	$0.32	55.25
Resources Connection	$551.33M	0.28	-$191.78M	-$2.96	N/A

In the previous week, Ooma had 12 more articles in the media than Resources Connection. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Ooma and 1 mentions for Resources Connection. Resources Connection's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Ooma's score of 0.77 indicating that Resources Connection is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Ooma	Positive
Resources Connection	Very Positive

Summary

Ooma beats Resources Connection on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Resources Connection compare to NerdWallet?

NerdWallet (NASDAQ:NRDS) and Resources Connection (NASDAQ:RGP) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, valuation, risk and institutional ownership.

NerdWallet has higher revenue and earnings than Resources Connection. Resources Connection is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NerdWallet, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
NerdWallet	$836.60M	0.68	$48.70M	$0.93	9.25
Resources Connection	$551.33M	0.28	-$191.78M	-$2.96	N/A

NerdWallet has a net margin of 8.11% compared to Resources Connection's net margin of -20.16%. NerdWallet's return on equity of 18.33% beat Resources Connection's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
NerdWallet	8.11%	18.33%	14.80%
Resources Connection	-20.16%	-0.55%	-0.38%

In the previous week, NerdWallet and NerdWallet both had 1 articles in the media. NerdWallet's average media sentiment score of 1.87 equaled Resources Connection'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
NerdWallet	Very Positive
Resources Connection	Very Positive

38.8% of NerdWallet shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.2% of Resources Connection shares are held by institutional investors. 52.8% of NerdWallet shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 7.9% of Resources Connection shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

NerdWallet has a beta of 1.34, indicating that its stock price is 34% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Resources Connection has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

NerdWallet presently has a consensus target price of $12.83, suggesting a potential upside of 49.22%. Resources Connection has a consensus target price of $7.00, suggesting a potential upside of 54.87%. Given Resources Connection's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Resources Connection is more favorable than NerdWallet.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
NerdWallet	2 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25
Resources Connection	2 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Summary

NerdWallet beats Resources Connection on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Resources Connection News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding RGP and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

RGP vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Resources Connection	Staffing Industry	Business Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$155.17M	$1.11B	$6.73B	$12.58B
Dividend Yield	6.75%	4.26%	3.03%	5.26%
P/E Ratio	-1.53	13.16	28.70	26.28
Price / Sales	0.28	2.62	424.09	114.71
Price / Cash	0.67	10.79	24.55	56.90
Price / Book	0.72	2.50	7.01	7.33
Net Income	-$191.78M	$7.19M	$203.25M	$337.06M
7 Day Performance	-0.22%	8.51%	3.39%	3.43%
1 Month Performance	10.51%	5.68%	4.82%	7.24%
1 Year Performance	-14.56%	-9.23%	37.27%	37.97%

Resources Connection Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
RGP Resources Connection	3.2347 of 5 stars	$4.52 +4.1%	$7.00 +54.9%	-16.9%	$155.17M	$551.33M	N/A	3,055	Positive News
PHR Phreesia	4.2206 of 5 stars	$8.84 -3.7%	$19.06 +115.7%	-59.5%	$566.47M	$480.59M	294.50	1,789	Trending News Earnings Report Analyst Forecast
CARS Cars.com	3.6304 of 5 stars	$9.74 -0.5%	$14.67 +50.5%	-0.8%	$547.29M	$723.24M	22.66	1,700
BWMN Bowman Consulting Group	4.2145 of 5 stars	$30.97 +1.0%	$47.50 +53.4%	+32.2%	$536.61M	$490.02M	51.62	2,300	Positive News
OOMA Ooma	4.4394 of 5 stars	$19.14 -1.9%	$19.00 -0.7%	+32.4%	$536.44M	$273.60M	87.00	1,420	Earnings Report Analyst Forecast

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:RGP) was last updated on 5/29/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Resources Connection (RGP) Competitors

RGP vs. PHR, CARS, BWMN, OOMA, and NRDS

How does Resources Connection compare to Phreesia?

Summary

How does Resources Connection compare to Cars.com?

Summary

How does Resources Connection compare to Bowman Consulting Group?

Summary

How does Resources Connection compare to Ooma?

Summary

How does Resources Connection compare to NerdWallet?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

RGP vs. The Competition

Resources Connection Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Resources Connection (RGP) Competitors

RGP vs. PHR, CARS, BWMN, OOMA, and NRDS

How does Resources Connection compare to Phreesia?

Which has better valuation and earnings, RGP or PHR?

Does the media prefer RGP or PHR?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in RGP or PHR?

Do analysts rate RGP or PHR?

Which has more volatility and risk, RGP or PHR?

Is RGP or PHR more profitable?

Summary

How does Resources Connection compare to Cars.com?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of RGP or CARS?

Is RGP or CARS more profitable?

Do analysts rate RGP or CARS?

Which has more risk & volatility, RGP or CARS?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, RGP or CARS?

Does the media prefer RGP or CARS?

Summary

How does Resources Connection compare to Bowman Consulting Group?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, BWMN or RGP?

Does the media prefer BWMN or RGP?

Which has more volatility & risk, BWMN or RGP?

Do analysts rate BWMN or RGP?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of BWMN or RGP?

Is BWMN or RGP more profitable?

Summary

How does Resources Connection compare to Ooma?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of OOMA or RGP?

Is OOMA or RGP more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, OOMA or RGP?

Do analysts prefer OOMA or RGP?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, OOMA or RGP?

Does the media favor OOMA or RGP?

Summary

How does Resources Connection compare to NerdWallet?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, NRDS or RGP?

Is NRDS or RGP more profitable?

Does the media refer more to NRDS or RGP?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of NRDS or RGP?

Which has more risk and volatility, NRDS or RGP?

Do analysts prefer NRDS or RGP?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

RGP vs. The Competition

Resources Connection Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools