Resources Connection (RGP) Competitors

$4.23 0.00 (0.00%)

Closing price 06/18/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$4.23 0.00 (0.00%)

As of 06/18/2026 06:45 PM Eastern

RGP vs. ONT, MAX, PHR, DDI, and BWMN

Should you buy Resources Connection stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Resources Connection with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Resources Connection include Montrose Environmental Group (ONT), MediaAlpha (MAX), Phreesia (PHR), DoubleDown Interactive (DDI), and Bowman Consulting Group (BWMN). These companies are all part of the "business services" industry.

How does Resources Connection compare to Montrose Environmental Group?

Montrose Environmental Group (NYSE:ONT) and Resources Connection (NASDAQ:RGP) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Resources Connection's average media sentiment score of 2.00 beat Montrose Environmental Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Resources Connection is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Montrose Environmental Group	Neutral
Resources Connection	Very Positive

Montrose Environmental Group has a beta of 1.72, suggesting that its share price is 72% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Resources Connection has a beta of 0.55, suggesting that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

Montrose Environmental Group currently has a consensus price target of $26.67, indicating a potential upside of 55.13%. Resources Connection has a consensus price target of $7.00, indicating a potential upside of 65.48%. Given Resources Connection's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Resources Connection is more favorable than Montrose Environmental Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Montrose Environmental Group	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.20
Resources Connection	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

Montrose Environmental Group has higher revenue and earnings than Resources Connection. Resources Connection is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Montrose Environmental Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Montrose Environmental Group	$830.54M	0.75	-$840K	$0.05	343.80
Resources Connection	$551.33M	0.26	-$191.78M	-$2.96	N/A

87.9% of Montrose Environmental Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.2% of Resources Connection shares are owned by institutional investors. 10.4% of Montrose Environmental Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 7.9% of Resources Connection shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Montrose Environmental Group has a net margin of 0.71% compared to Resources Connection's net margin of -20.16%. Montrose Environmental Group's return on equity of 5.61% beat Resources Connection's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Montrose Environmental Group	0.71%	5.61%	2.61%
Resources Connection	-20.16%	-0.55%	-0.38%

Summary

Montrose Environmental Group beats Resources Connection on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Resources Connection compare to MediaAlpha?

MediaAlpha (NYSE:MAX) and Resources Connection (NASDAQ:RGP) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and risk.

MediaAlpha has a beta of 1.16, meaning that its stock price is 16% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Resources Connection has a beta of 0.55, meaning that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

MediaAlpha has higher revenue and earnings than Resources Connection. Resources Connection is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MediaAlpha, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
MediaAlpha	$1.11B	0.57	$25.62M	$0.64	15.85
Resources Connection	$551.33M	0.26	-$191.78M	-$2.96	N/A

64.4% of MediaAlpha shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.2% of Resources Connection shares are held by institutional investors. 14.7% of MediaAlpha shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 7.9% of Resources Connection shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

MediaAlpha has a net margin of 3.37% compared to Resources Connection's net margin of -20.16%. Resources Connection's return on equity of -0.55% beat MediaAlpha's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
MediaAlpha	3.37%	-147.82%	21.12%
Resources Connection	-20.16%	-0.55%	-0.38%

In the previous week, MediaAlpha had 15 more articles in the media than Resources Connection. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for MediaAlpha and 0 mentions for Resources Connection. Resources Connection's average media sentiment score of 2.00 beat MediaAlpha's score of 0.08 indicating that Resources Connection is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
MediaAlpha	Neutral
Resources Connection	Very Positive

MediaAlpha presently has a consensus price target of $12.58, suggesting a potential upside of 24.07%. Resources Connection has a consensus price target of $7.00, suggesting a potential upside of 65.48%. Given Resources Connection's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Resources Connection is more favorable than MediaAlpha.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
MediaAlpha	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.63
Resources Connection	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

Summary

MediaAlpha beats Resources Connection on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Resources Connection compare to Phreesia?

Phreesia (NYSE:PHR) and Resources Connection (NASDAQ:RGP) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Phreesia has a net margin of 1.85% compared to Resources Connection's net margin of -20.16%. Phreesia's return on equity of 5.13% beat Resources Connection's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Phreesia	1.85%	5.13%	3.12%
Resources Connection	-20.16%	-0.55%	-0.38%

In the previous week, Phreesia had 26 more articles in the media than Resources Connection. MarketBeat recorded 26 mentions for Phreesia and 0 mentions for Resources Connection. Resources Connection's average media sentiment score of 2.00 beat Phreesia's score of 0.21 indicating that Resources Connection is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Phreesia	Neutral
Resources Connection	Very Positive

Phreesia has a beta of 0.91, meaning that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Resources Connection has a beta of 0.55, meaning that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

Phreesia has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Resources Connection. Resources Connection is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Phreesia, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Phreesia	$480.59M	1.20	$2.31M	$0.15	62.37
Resources Connection	$551.33M	0.26	-$191.78M	-$2.96	N/A

92.1% of Phreesia shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.2% of Resources Connection shares are held by institutional investors. 5.2% of Phreesia shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 7.9% of Resources Connection shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Phreesia currently has a consensus target price of $16.65, suggesting a potential upside of 77.93%. Resources Connection has a consensus target price of $7.00, suggesting a potential upside of 65.48%. Given Phreesia's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Phreesia is more favorable than Resources Connection.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Phreesia	1 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.42
Resources Connection	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

Summary

Phreesia beats Resources Connection on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Resources Connection compare to DoubleDown Interactive?

DoubleDown Interactive (NASDAQ:DDI) and Resources Connection (NASDAQ:RGP) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations and profitability.

DoubleDown Interactive has a beta of 1.02, meaning that its share price is 2% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Resources Connection has a beta of 0.55, meaning that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

DoubleDown Interactive has a net margin of 30.77% compared to Resources Connection's net margin of -20.16%. DoubleDown Interactive's return on equity of 12.16% beat Resources Connection's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
DoubleDown Interactive	30.77%	12.16%	11.12%
Resources Connection	-20.16%	-0.55%	-0.38%

In the previous week, DoubleDown Interactive had 1 more articles in the media than Resources Connection. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for DoubleDown Interactive and 0 mentions for Resources Connection. Resources Connection's average media sentiment score of 2.00 beat DoubleDown Interactive's score of 1.03 indicating that Resources Connection is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
DoubleDown Interactive	Positive
Resources Connection	Very Positive

DoubleDown Interactive presently has a consensus price target of $15.67, suggesting a potential upside of 38.15%. Resources Connection has a consensus price target of $7.00, suggesting a potential upside of 65.48%. Given Resources Connection's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Resources Connection is more favorable than DoubleDown Interactive.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
DoubleDown Interactive	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40
Resources Connection	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

DoubleDown Interactive has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Resources Connection. Resources Connection is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than DoubleDown Interactive, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
DoubleDown Interactive	$359.94M	1.56	$102.50M	$2.30	4.93
Resources Connection	$551.33M	0.26	-$191.78M	-$2.96	N/A

93.2% of Resources Connection shares are held by institutional investors. 7.9% of Resources Connection shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

DoubleDown Interactive beats Resources Connection on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Resources Connection compare to Bowman Consulting Group?

Bowman Consulting Group (NASDAQ:BWMN) and Resources Connection (NASDAQ:RGP) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Bowman Consulting Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Resources Connection. Resources Connection is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bowman Consulting Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Bowman Consulting Group	$490.02M	1.08	$12.85M	$0.60	50.60
Resources Connection	$551.33M	0.26	-$191.78M	-$2.96	N/A

Bowman Consulting Group currently has a consensus target price of $47.50, suggesting a potential upside of 56.47%. Resources Connection has a consensus target price of $7.00, suggesting a potential upside of 65.48%. Given Resources Connection's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Resources Connection is more favorable than Bowman Consulting Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Bowman Consulting Group	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
Resources Connection	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

Bowman Consulting Group has a net margin of 2.02% compared to Resources Connection's net margin of -20.16%. Bowman Consulting Group's return on equity of 3.98% beat Resources Connection's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Bowman Consulting Group	2.02%	3.98%	1.84%
Resources Connection	-20.16%	-0.55%	-0.38%

In the previous week, Bowman Consulting Group had 2 more articles in the media than Resources Connection. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Bowman Consulting Group and 0 mentions for Resources Connection. Resources Connection's average media sentiment score of 2.00 beat Bowman Consulting Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Resources Connection is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Bowman Consulting Group	Neutral
Resources Connection	Very Positive

63.2% of Bowman Consulting Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.2% of Resources Connection shares are held by institutional investors. 17.5% of Bowman Consulting Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 7.9% of Resources Connection shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Bowman Consulting Group has a beta of 1.33, meaning that its share price is 33% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Resources Connection has a beta of 0.55, meaning that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Bowman Consulting Group beats Resources Connection on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Resources Connection News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding RGP and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

RGP vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Resources Connection	Staffing Industry	Business Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$145.21M	$1.15B	$6.69B	$12.60B
Dividend Yield	6.62%	3.97%	3.19%	5.67%
P/E Ratio	-1.43	13.61	28.80	24.42
Price / Sales	0.26	2.98	377.15	112.33
Price / Cash	0.69	11.68	23.58	55.09
Price / Book	0.68	3.27	5.78	6.58
Net Income	-$191.78M	$7.19M	$205.59M	$337.17M
7 Day Performance	-9.03%	-0.45%	6.07%	0.61%
1 Month Performance	-1.40%	20.22%	9.06%	5.02%
1 Year Performance	-22.95%	-14.42%	37.60%	35.52%

Resources Connection Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
RGP Resources Connection	3.5499 of 5 stars	$4.23 flat	$7.00 +65.5%	-23.0%	$145.21M	$551.33M	N/A	3,055	High Trading Volume
ONT Montrose Environmental Group	4.0322 of 5 stars	$16.93 -0.2%	$26.67 +57.5%	-23.2%	$607.50M	$821.22M	338.67	3,500	Positive News
MAX MediaAlpha	4.2705 of 5 stars	$9.61 +3.2%	$12.58 +30.9%	-3.3%	$597.94M	$1.16B	15.02	160	Analyst Downgrade Insider Trade Gap Down High Trading Volume
PHR Phreesia	4.0929 of 5 stars	$9.15 -1.6%	$16.65 +82.0%	-63.6%	$574.23M	$495.59M	60.97	1,789	Trending News
DDI DoubleDown Interactive	4.0806 of 5 stars	$11.50 +0.2%	$15.67 +36.2%	+29.3%	$568.87M	$359.94M	5.00	220

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:RGP) was last updated on 6/19/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Resources Connection (RGP) Competitors

RGP vs. ONT, MAX, PHR, DDI, and BWMN

How does Resources Connection compare to Montrose Environmental Group?

Summary

How does Resources Connection compare to MediaAlpha?

Summary

How does Resources Connection compare to Phreesia?

Summary

How does Resources Connection compare to DoubleDown Interactive?

Summary

How does Resources Connection compare to Bowman Consulting Group?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

RGP vs. The Competition

Resources Connection Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Resources Connection (RGP) Competitors

RGP vs. ONT, MAX, PHR, DDI, and BWMN

How does Resources Connection compare to Montrose Environmental Group?

Does the media favor ONT or RGP?

Which has more volatility and risk, ONT or RGP?

Do analysts rate ONT or RGP?

Which has better earnings & valuation, ONT or RGP?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in ONT or RGP?

Is ONT or RGP more profitable?

Summary

How does Resources Connection compare to MediaAlpha?

Which has more volatility & risk, MAX or RGP?

Which has better earnings & valuation, MAX or RGP?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of MAX or RGP?

Is MAX or RGP more profitable?

Does the media prefer MAX or RGP?

Do analysts prefer MAX or RGP?

Summary

How does Resources Connection compare to Phreesia?

Is PHR or RGP more profitable?

Does the media favor PHR or RGP?

Which has more volatility and risk, PHR or RGP?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, PHR or RGP?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of PHR or RGP?

Do analysts prefer PHR or RGP?

Summary

How does Resources Connection compare to DoubleDown Interactive?

Which has more risk & volatility, DDI or RGP?

Is DDI or RGP more profitable?

Does the media favor DDI or RGP?

Do analysts prefer DDI or RGP?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, DDI or RGP?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in DDI or RGP?

Summary

How does Resources Connection compare to Bowman Consulting Group?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, BWMN or RGP?

Do analysts prefer BWMN or RGP?

Is BWMN or RGP more profitable?

Does the media favor BWMN or RGP?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in BWMN or RGP?

Which has more risk and volatility, BWMN or RGP?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

RGP vs. The Competition

Resources Connection Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools