Do analysts recommend ROMA or RGP?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Roma Green Finance 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Resources Connection 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.50

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, ROMA or RGP?

Roma Green Finance has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Resources Connection. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Roma Green Finance $1.22M 310.20 -$3.50M N/A N/A Resources Connection $452.01M 0.20 -$40.60M -$1.36 N/A

Do analysts rate PPHC or RGP?

Public Policy currently has a consensus price target of $17.00, indicating a potential upside of 61.60%. Given Public Policy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Public Policy is more favorable than Resources Connection. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Public Policy 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.25 Resources Connection 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.50

Do analysts rate RGP or SPIR?

Spire Global has a consensus target price of $16.90, indicating a potential upside of 87.03%. Given Spire Global's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Spire Global is more favorable than Resources Connection. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Resources Connection 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.50 Spire Global 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 5 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.67

Do analysts prefer FC or RGP?

Franklin Covey currently has a consensus target price of $27.50, indicating a potential upside of 92.33%. Given Franklin Covey's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Franklin Covey is more favorable than Resources Connection. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Franklin Covey 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.25 Resources Connection 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.50

Do analysts recommend VACI or RGP?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Viking Acquisition Corp. I 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Resources Connection 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.50

Which has better valuation and earnings, VACI or RGP?

Viking Acquisition Corp. I has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Resources Connection. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Viking Acquisition Corp. I N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Resources Connection $452.01M 0.20 -$40.60M -$1.36 N/A

Resources Connection (RGP) Competitors

$2.67 -0.02 (-0.89%)

As of 11:49 AM Eastern

Compare

RGP vs. ROMA, PPHC, SPIR, FC, and VACI

Should you buy Resources Connection stock or one of its competitors? Resources Connection's main competitors and comparable companies include Roma Green Finance (ROMA), Public Policy (PPHC), Spire Global (SPIR), Franklin Covey (FC), and Viking Acquisition Corp. I (VACI). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "research & consulting services" industry.

How does Resources Connection compare to Roma Green Finance?

Roma Green Finance (NASDAQ:ROMA) and Resources Connection (NASDAQ:RGP) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, earnings and risk.

Roma Green Finance has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Resources Connection.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Roma Green Finance	$1.22M	310.20	-$3.50M	N/A	N/A
Resources Connection	$452.01M	0.20	-$40.60M	-$1.36	N/A

In the previous week, Roma Green Finance and Roma Green Finance both had 1 articles in the media. Resources Connection's average media sentiment score of 1.79 beat Roma Green Finance's score of 0.68 indicating that Resources Connection is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Roma Green Finance	Positive
Resources Connection	Very Positive

93.2% of Resources Connection shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Roma Green Finance shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.5% of Resources Connection shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Roma Green Finance has a beta of 1.96, suggesting that its stock price is 96% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Resources Connection has a beta of 0.56, suggesting that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

Roma Green Finance has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Resources Connection's net margin of -10.74%. Roma Green Finance's return on equity of 0.00% beat Resources Connection's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Roma Green Finance	N/A	N/A	N/A
Resources Connection	-10.74%	-8.10%	-5.48%

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Roma Green Finance	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Resources Connection	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50

Summary

Roma Green Finance beats Resources Connection on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Resources Connection compare to Public Policy?

Public Policy (NASDAQ:PPHC) and Resources Connection (NASDAQ:RGP) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Public Policy currently has a consensus price target of $17.00, indicating a potential upside of 61.60%. Given Public Policy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Public Policy is more favorable than Resources Connection.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Public Policy	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25
Resources Connection	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50

Resources Connection has a net margin of -10.74% compared to Public Policy's net margin of -14.56%. Public Policy's return on equity of 10.89% beat Resources Connection's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Public Policy	-14.56%	10.89%	4.68%
Resources Connection	-10.74%	-8.10%	-5.48%

93.2% of Resources Connection shares are held by institutional investors. 14.6% of Public Policy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.5% of Resources Connection shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Public Policy pays an annual dividend of $0.23 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Resources Connection pays an annual dividend of $0.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.5%. Public Policy pays out -14.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Resources Connection pays out -20.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Resources Connection is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Public Policy has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Resources Connection. Public Policy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Resources Connection, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Public Policy	$186.54M	1.72	-$39M	-$1.55	N/A
Resources Connection	$452.01M	0.20	-$40.60M	-$1.36	N/A

In the previous week, Public Policy had 5 more articles in the media than Resources Connection. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Public Policy and 1 mentions for Resources Connection. Resources Connection's average media sentiment score of 1.79 beat Public Policy's score of 0.97 indicating that Resources Connection is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Public Policy	Positive
Resources Connection	Very Positive

Summary

Public Policy beats Resources Connection on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Resources Connection compare to Spire Global?

Resources Connection (NASDAQ:RGP) and Spire Global (NYSE:SPIR) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations and risk.

Resources Connection has a beta of 0.56, suggesting that its share price is 44% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Spire Global has a beta of 3.19, suggesting that its share price is 219% more volatile than the broader market.

Resources Connection has a net margin of -10.74% compared to Spire Global's net margin of -134.64%. Resources Connection's return on equity of -8.10% beat Spire Global's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Resources Connection	-10.74%	-8.10%	-5.48%
Spire Global	-134.64%	-53.56%	-30.64%

Spire Global has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Resources Connection. Spire Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Resources Connection, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Resources Connection	$452.01M	0.20	-$40.60M	-$1.36	N/A
Spire Global	$71.55M	4.96	$51.31M	-$2.58	N/A

93.2% of Resources Connection shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.0% of Spire Global shares are held by institutional investors. 5.5% of Resources Connection shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.0% of Spire Global shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Spire Global has a consensus target price of $16.90, indicating a potential upside of 87.03%. Given Spire Global's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Spire Global is more favorable than Resources Connection.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Resources Connection	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50
Spire Global	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

In the previous week, Spire Global had 13 more articles in the media than Resources Connection. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Spire Global and 1 mentions for Resources Connection. Resources Connection's average media sentiment score of 1.79 beat Spire Global's score of -0.30 indicating that Resources Connection is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Resources Connection	Very Positive
Spire Global	Neutral

Summary

Resources Connection and Spire Global tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Resources Connection compare to Franklin Covey?

Franklin Covey (NYSE:FC) and Resources Connection (NASDAQ:RGP) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, dividends and earnings.

69.9% of Franklin Covey shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.2% of Resources Connection shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.2% of Franklin Covey shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.5% of Resources Connection shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Franklin Covey has a net margin of 1.88% compared to Resources Connection's net margin of -10.74%. Franklin Covey's return on equity of 25.57% beat Resources Connection's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Franklin Covey	1.88%	25.57%	5.52%
Resources Connection	-10.74%	-8.10%	-5.48%

Franklin Covey has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Resources Connection. Resources Connection is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Franklin Covey, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Franklin Covey	$261.45M	0.62	$4.92M	$0.45	31.77
Resources Connection	$452.01M	0.20	-$40.60M	-$1.36	N/A

Franklin Covey currently has a consensus target price of $27.50, indicating a potential upside of 92.33%. Given Franklin Covey's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Franklin Covey is more favorable than Resources Connection.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Franklin Covey	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25
Resources Connection	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50

Franklin Covey has a beta of 0.76, meaning that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Resources Connection has a beta of 0.56, meaning that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Franklin Covey had 11 more articles in the media than Resources Connection. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Franklin Covey and 1 mentions for Resources Connection. Resources Connection's average media sentiment score of 1.79 beat Franklin Covey's score of 1.00 indicating that Resources Connection is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Franklin Covey	Positive
Resources Connection	Very Positive

Summary

Franklin Covey beats Resources Connection on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Resources Connection compare to Viking Acquisition Corp. I?

Viking Acquisition Corp. I (NYSE:VACI) and Resources Connection (NASDAQ:RGP) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment and profitability.

In the previous week, Viking Acquisition Corp. I and Viking Acquisition Corp. I both had 1 articles in the media. Resources Connection's average media sentiment score of 1.79 beat Viking Acquisition Corp. I's score of 0.00 indicating that Resources Connection is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Viking Acquisition Corp. I	Neutral
Resources Connection	Very Positive

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Viking Acquisition Corp. I	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Resources Connection	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50

Viking Acquisition Corp. I has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Resources Connection.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Viking Acquisition Corp. I	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Resources Connection	$452.01M	0.20	-$40.60M	-$1.36	N/A

Viking Acquisition Corp. I has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Resources Connection's net margin of -10.74%. Viking Acquisition Corp. I's return on equity of 0.00% beat Resources Connection's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Viking Acquisition Corp. I	N/A	N/A	N/A
Resources Connection	-10.74%	-8.10%	-5.48%

93.2% of Resources Connection shares are held by institutional investors. 5.5% of Resources Connection shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Resources Connection beats Viking Acquisition Corp. I on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Resources Connection News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding RGP and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

RGP vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Resources Connection	Professional Services Industry	Industrials Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$92.68M	$8.28B	$10.08B	$12.00B
Dividend Yield	10.22%	3.60%	2.91%	4.50%
P/E Ratio	-1.96	25.12	32.25	30.31
Price / Sales	0.20	2.37	3.16	5.84
Price / Cash	58.64	22.43	19.83	22.80
Price / Book	0.54	4.70	3.78	3.77
Net Income	-$40.60M	$234.86M	$611.94M	$390.69M
7 Day Performance	0.23%	0.32%	0.90%	-0.60%
1 Month Performance	-2.34%	1.06%	-2.57%	-6.88%
1 Year Performance	-42.67%	-2.32%	2.00%	-6.20%

Resources Connection Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
RGP Resources Connection	1.6713 of 5 stars	$2.67 -0.9%	N/A	-40.6%	$92.68M	$452.01M	N/A	3,006	Positive News
ROMA Roma Green Finance	0.1003 of 5 stars	$6.13 -2.3%	N/A	+132.7%	$364.81M	$1.22M	N/A	16	Gap Up
PPHC Public Policy	4.1554 of 5 stars	$11.68 +3.0%	$17.00 +45.6%	N/A	$354.87M	$200.91M	106.14	450	Earnings Report
SPIR Spire Global	2.2969 of 5 stars	$8.51 +10.4%	$17.90 +110.3%	+12.7%	$332.87M	$62.38M	N/A	377	Analyst Downgrade Gap Up
FC Franklin Covey	4.0278 of 5 stars	$16.30 +0.8%	$27.50 +68.8%	-1.5%	$184.04M	$262.75M	36.21	1,120	Insider Trade

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:RGP) was last updated on 11/13/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Resources Connection (RGP) Competitors

RGP vs. ROMA, PPHC, SPIR, FC, and VACI

How does Resources Connection compare to Roma Green Finance?

Summary

How does Resources Connection compare to Public Policy?

Summary

How does Resources Connection compare to Spire Global?

Summary

How does Resources Connection compare to Franklin Covey?

Summary

How does Resources Connection compare to Viking Acquisition Corp. I?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

RGP vs. The Competition

Resources Connection Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Resources Connection (RGP) Competitors

RGP vs. ROMA, PPHC, SPIR, FC, and VACI

How does Resources Connection compare to Roma Green Finance?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, ROMA or RGP?

Does the media favor ROMA or RGP?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in ROMA or RGP?

Which has more risk and volatility, ROMA or RGP?

Is ROMA or RGP more profitable?

Do analysts recommend ROMA or RGP?

Summary

How does Resources Connection compare to Public Policy?

Do analysts rate PPHC or RGP?

Is PPHC or RGP more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in PPHC or RGP?

Is PPHC or RGP a better dividend stock?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, PPHC or RGP?

Does the media refer more to PPHC or RGP?

Summary

How does Resources Connection compare to Spire Global?

Which has more volatility & risk, RGP or SPIR?

Is RGP or SPIR more profitable?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, RGP or SPIR?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in RGP or SPIR?

Do analysts rate RGP or SPIR?

Does the media refer more to RGP or SPIR?

Summary

How does Resources Connection compare to Franklin Covey?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in FC or RGP?

Is FC or RGP more profitable?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, FC or RGP?

Do analysts prefer FC or RGP?

Which has more risk & volatility, FC or RGP?

Does the media refer more to FC or RGP?

Summary

How does Resources Connection compare to Viking Acquisition Corp. I?

Does the media prefer VACI or RGP?

Do analysts recommend VACI or RGP?

Which has better valuation and earnings, VACI or RGP?

Is VACI or RGP more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of VACI or RGP?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

RGP vs. The Competition

Resources Connection Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools