Go Pro

Cassava Sciences (FLNA) Competitors

Cassava Sciences logo
$0.85 +0.10 (+13.62%)
As of 04:00 PM Eastern

FLNA vs. NERV, MENS, SBTX, NMRA, and IMUX

Should you buy Cassava Sciences stock or one of its competitors? Cassava Sciences's main competitors and comparable companies include Minerva Neurosciences (NERV), Jyong Biotech (MENS), Silverback Therapeutics (SBTX), Neumora Therapeutics (NMRA), and Immunic (IMUX). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "pharmaceuticals" industry.

How does Cassava Sciences compare to Minerva Neurosciences?

Cassava Sciences (NASDAQ:FLNA) and Minerva Neurosciences (NASDAQ:NERV) are both small-cap healthcare companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, profitability, valuation, risk, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Cassava Sciences presently has a consensus price target of $5.00, suggesting a potential upside of 488.24%. Minerva Neurosciences has a consensus price target of $10.33, suggesting a potential upside of 203.92%. Given Cassava Sciences' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Cassava Sciences is more favorable than Minerva Neurosciences.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cassava Sciences
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Minerva Neurosciences
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75

In the previous week, Cassava Sciences had 5 more articles in the media than Minerva Neurosciences. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Cassava Sciences and 1 mentions for Minerva Neurosciences. Minerva Neurosciences' average media sentiment score of 1.79 beat Cassava Sciences' score of 0.59 indicating that Minerva Neurosciences is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cassava Sciences Positive
Minerva Neurosciences Very Positive

38.1% of Cassava Sciences shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.6% of Minerva Neurosciences shares are held by institutional investors. 4.6% of Cassava Sciences shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Minerva Neurosciences shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Cassava Sciences is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Minerva Neurosciences, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cassava SciencesN/AN/A-$90.97M-$0.87N/A
Minerva NeurosciencesN/AN/A-$293.42M-$28.87N/A

Cassava Sciences has a beta of -0.69, indicating that its share price is 169% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Minerva Neurosciences has a beta of -0.08, indicating that its share price is 108% less volatile than the broader market.

Minerva Neurosciences' return on equity of 0.00% beat Cassava Sciences' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cassava SciencesN/A -58.78% -36.74%
Minerva Neurosciences N/A N/A -31.72%

Summary

Cassava Sciences beats Minerva Neurosciences on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cassava Sciences compare to Jyong Biotech?

Cassava Sciences (NASDAQ:FLNA) and Jyong Biotech (NASDAQ:MENS) are both small-cap healthcare companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment and valuation.

Jyong Biotech's return on equity of 0.00% beat Cassava Sciences' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cassava SciencesN/A -58.78% -36.74%
Jyong Biotech N/A N/A N/A

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cassava SciencesN/AN/A-$90.97M-$0.87N/A
Jyong BiotechN/AN/A-$4.67MN/AN/A

38.1% of Cassava Sciences shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.6% of Cassava Sciences shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Cassava Sciences presently has a consensus price target of $5.00, indicating a potential upside of 488.24%. Given Cassava Sciences' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Cassava Sciences is more favorable than Jyong Biotech.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cassava Sciences
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Jyong Biotech
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

In the previous week, Cassava Sciences had 5 more articles in the media than Jyong Biotech. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Cassava Sciences and 1 mentions for Jyong Biotech. Jyong Biotech's average media sentiment score of 1.79 beat Cassava Sciences' score of 0.59 indicating that Jyong Biotech is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cassava Sciences Positive
Jyong Biotech Very Positive

Cassava Sciences has a beta of -0.69, suggesting that its share price is 169% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Jyong Biotech has a beta of 2.24, suggesting that its share price is 124% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Cassava Sciences beats Jyong Biotech on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cassava Sciences compare to Silverback Therapeutics?

Cassava Sciences (NASDAQ:FLNA) and Silverback Therapeutics (NASDAQ:SBTX) are both small-cap healthcare companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership and profitability.

In the previous week, Cassava Sciences had 6 more articles in the media than Silverback Therapeutics. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Cassava Sciences and 0 mentions for Silverback Therapeutics. Cassava Sciences' average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat Silverback Therapeutics' score of 0.00 indicating that Cassava Sciences is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cassava Sciences Positive
Silverback Therapeutics Neutral

Cassava Sciences currently has a consensus target price of $5.00, indicating a potential upside of 488.24%. Given Cassava Sciences' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Cassava Sciences is more favorable than Silverback Therapeutics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cassava Sciences
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Silverback Therapeutics
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Silverback Therapeutics' return on equity of -29.62% beat Cassava Sciences' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cassava SciencesN/A -58.78% -36.74%
Silverback Therapeutics N/A -29.62%-28.20%

Cassava Sciences has a beta of -0.69, meaning that its stock price is 169% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Silverback Therapeutics has a beta of 0.6, meaning that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the broader market.

Silverback Therapeutics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cassava Sciences, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cassava SciencesN/AN/A-$90.97M-$0.87N/A
Silverback TherapeuticsN/AN/A-$89.48M-$2.42N/A

38.1% of Cassava Sciences shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 74.9% of Silverback Therapeutics shares are held by institutional investors. 4.6% of Cassava Sciences shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 34.4% of Silverback Therapeutics shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Cassava Sciences beats Silverback Therapeutics on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cassava Sciences compare to Neumora Therapeutics?

Cassava Sciences (NASDAQ:FLNA) and Neumora Therapeutics (NASDAQ:NMRA) are both small-cap healthcare companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability and risk.

In the previous week, Cassava Sciences had 4 more articles in the media than Neumora Therapeutics. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Cassava Sciences and 2 mentions for Neumora Therapeutics. Neumora Therapeutics' average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Cassava Sciences' score of 0.59 indicating that Neumora Therapeutics is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Cassava Sciences
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Neumora Therapeutics
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Cassava Sciences is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Neumora Therapeutics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cassava SciencesN/AN/A-$90.97M-$0.87N/A
Neumora TherapeuticsN/AN/A-$236.93M-$1.23N/A

Cassava Sciences presently has a consensus price target of $5.00, indicating a potential upside of 488.24%. Neumora Therapeutics has a consensus price target of $6.57, indicating a potential upside of 849.90%. Given Neumora Therapeutics' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Neumora Therapeutics is more favorable than Cassava Sciences.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cassava Sciences
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Neumora Therapeutics
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.78

Cassava Sciences has a beta of -0.69, meaning that its stock price is 169% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Neumora Therapeutics has a beta of 2.71, meaning that its stock price is 171% more volatile than the broader market.

Cassava Sciences' return on equity of -58.78% beat Neumora Therapeutics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cassava SciencesN/A -58.78% -36.74%
Neumora Therapeutics N/A -242.28%-131.32%

38.1% of Cassava Sciences shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.7% of Neumora Therapeutics shares are held by institutional investors. 4.6% of Cassava Sciences shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 26.9% of Neumora Therapeutics shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Neumora Therapeutics beats Cassava Sciences on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cassava Sciences compare to Immunic?

Cassava Sciences (NASDAQ:FLNA) and Immunic (NASDAQ:IMUX) are both small-cap healthcare companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, risk, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership and dividends.

38.1% of Cassava Sciences shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.8% of Immunic shares are held by institutional investors. 4.6% of Cassava Sciences shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.5% of Immunic shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Immunic is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cassava Sciences, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cassava SciencesN/AN/A-$90.97M-$0.87N/A
ImmunicN/AN/A-$97.17M-$4.38N/A

Cassava Sciences currently has a consensus price target of $5.00, suggesting a potential upside of 488.24%. Immunic has a consensus price target of $47.25, suggesting a potential upside of 396.85%. Given Cassava Sciences' higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Cassava Sciences is more favorable than Immunic.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cassava Sciences
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Immunic
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Cassava Sciences' return on equity of -58.78% beat Immunic's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cassava SciencesN/A -58.78% -36.74%
Immunic N/A -157.89%-107.88%

In the previous week, Cassava Sciences had 4 more articles in the media than Immunic. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Cassava Sciences and 2 mentions for Immunic. Immunic's average media sentiment score of 1.79 beat Cassava Sciences' score of 0.59 indicating that Immunic is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Cassava Sciences
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Immunic
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Cassava Sciences has a beta of -0.69, indicating that its stock price is 169% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Immunic has a beta of 1.41, indicating that its stock price is 41% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Cassava Sciences and Immunic tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Cassava Sciences News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FLNA and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FLNA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FLNA vs. The Competition

MetricCassava SciencesPharmaceuticals IndustryHealthcare SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$41.06M$12.61B$7.32B$13.03B
Dividend YieldN/A2.62%2.52%14.03%
P/E Ratio-0.98792.36275.0525.61
Price / SalesN/A954.00662.59108.06
Price / CashN/A15.2228.0235.00
Price / Book0.5510.6310.536.44
Net Income-$90.97M$2.84B$3.50B$360.47M
7 Day Performance14.94%-1.18%-1.73%-1.03%
1 Month Performance-8.50%-1.15%-3.76%-3.70%
1 Year Performance-71.57%1.62%14.48%3.62%

Cassava Sciences Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FLNA
Cassava Sciences
1.8395 of 5 stars
$0.85
+13.6%
$5.00
+488.2%
-75.0%$41.06MN/AN/A30
NERV
Minerva Neurosciences
1.8001 of 5 stars
$3.42
+0.6%
$10.33
+202.2%
+60.4%$164.01MN/AN/A7
MENS
Jyong Biotech
N/A$1.99
-2.0%
N/A-96.6%$151.22MN/AN/A27
SBTX
Silverback Therapeutics
N/A$4.08
-1.7%
N/A-58.4%$147.12MN/AN/A83
NMRA
Neumora Therapeutics
3.5646 of 5 stars
$0.74
+9.1%
$6.57
+789.2%
-61.1%$139.99MN/AN/A63

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:FLNA) was last updated on 9/28/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners