Free Trial

Cassava Sciences (FLNA) Competitors

Cassava Sciences logo
$1.21 -0.01 (-0.82%)
As of 04:00 PM Eastern

FLNA vs. IMRX, ZNTL, EDIT, NVCT, and MGNX

Should you buy Cassava Sciences stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Cassava Sciences with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Cassava Sciences include Immuneering (IMRX), Zentalis Pharmaceuticals (ZNTL), Editas Medicine (EDIT), Nuvectis Pharma (NVCT), and MacroGenics (MGNX). These companies are all part of the "pharmaceutical products" industry.

How does Cassava Sciences compare to Immuneering?

Cassava Sciences (NASDAQ:FLNA) and Immuneering (NASDAQ:IMRX) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, risk, valuation, profitability, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Immuneering's return on equity of -31.93% beat Cassava Sciences' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cassava SciencesN/A -53.90% -34.20%
Immuneering N/A -31.93%-29.92%

38.1% of Cassava Sciences shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.7% of Immuneering shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.6% of Cassava Sciences shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 22.9% of Immuneering shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Immuneering had 6 more articles in the media than Cassava Sciences. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Immuneering and 0 mentions for Cassava Sciences. Cassava Sciences' average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Immuneering's score of 0.64 indicating that Cassava Sciences is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cassava Sciences Positive
Immuneering Positive

Cassava Sciences has a beta of -0.71, indicating that its stock price is 171% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Immuneering has a beta of 0.38, indicating that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the broader market.

Cassava Sciences presently has a consensus price target of $5.00, indicating a potential upside of 313.22%. Immuneering has a consensus price target of $16.50, indicating a potential upside of 274.15%. Given Cassava Sciences' higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Cassava Sciences is more favorable than Immuneering.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cassava Sciences
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Immuneering
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86

Immuneering is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cassava Sciences, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cassava SciencesN/AN/A-$90.97M-$1.61N/A
ImmuneeringN/AN/A-$56.03M-$1.17N/A

Summary

Immuneering beats Cassava Sciences on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cassava Sciences compare to Zentalis Pharmaceuticals?

Cassava Sciences (NASDAQ:FLNA) and Zentalis Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:ZNTL) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, earnings, profitability, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Zentalis Pharmaceuticals' return on equity of -53.61% beat Cassava Sciences' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cassava SciencesN/A -53.90% -34.20%
Zentalis Pharmaceuticals N/A -53.61%-40.67%

In the previous week, Zentalis Pharmaceuticals' average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat Cassava Sciences' score of 0.93 indicating that Zentalis Pharmaceuticals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cassava Sciences Positive
Zentalis Pharmaceuticals Very Positive

Zentalis Pharmaceuticals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cassava Sciences, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cassava SciencesN/AN/A-$90.97M-$1.61N/A
Zentalis PharmaceuticalsN/AN/A-$137.06M-$1.73N/A

38.1% of Cassava Sciences shares are held by institutional investors. 4.6% of Cassava Sciences shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.8% of Zentalis Pharmaceuticals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Cassava Sciences has a beta of -0.71, meaning that its stock price is 171% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Zentalis Pharmaceuticals has a beta of 1.96, meaning that its stock price is 96% more volatile than the broader market.

Cassava Sciences presently has a consensus target price of $5.00, indicating a potential upside of 313.22%. Zentalis Pharmaceuticals has a consensus target price of $5.83, indicating a potential upside of 61.14%. Given Cassava Sciences' higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Cassava Sciences is more favorable than Zentalis Pharmaceuticals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cassava Sciences
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Zentalis Pharmaceuticals
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.14

Summary

Cassava Sciences beats Zentalis Pharmaceuticals on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cassava Sciences compare to Editas Medicine?

Editas Medicine (NASDAQ:EDIT) and Cassava Sciences (NASDAQ:FLNA) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, valuation, risk and institutional ownership.

Cassava Sciences has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Editas Medicine. Editas Medicine is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cassava Sciences, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Editas Medicine$38.69M6.45-$160.06M-$1.23N/A
Cassava SciencesN/AN/A-$90.97M-$1.61N/A

Editas Medicine has a beta of 2.16, indicating that its stock price is 116% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cassava Sciences has a beta of -0.71, indicating that its stock price is 171% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Cassava Sciences' average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Editas Medicine's score of 0.43 indicating that Cassava Sciences is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Editas Medicine Neutral
Cassava Sciences Positive

71.9% of Editas Medicine shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.1% of Cassava Sciences shares are held by institutional investors. 3.1% of Editas Medicine shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.6% of Cassava Sciences shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Editas Medicine presently has a consensus target price of $5.40, suggesting a potential upside of 111.76%. Cassava Sciences has a consensus target price of $5.00, suggesting a potential upside of 313.22%. Given Cassava Sciences' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Cassava Sciences is more favorable than Editas Medicine.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Editas Medicine
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57
Cassava Sciences
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Cassava Sciences has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Editas Medicine's net margin of -281.59%. Cassava Sciences' return on equity of -53.90% beat Editas Medicine's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Editas Medicine-281.59% -677.39% -58.25%
Cassava Sciences N/A -53.90%-34.20%

Summary

Cassava Sciences beats Editas Medicine on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cassava Sciences compare to Nuvectis Pharma?

Cassava Sciences (NASDAQ:FLNA) and Nuvectis Pharma (NASDAQ:NVCT) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk and valuation.

Cassava Sciences has a beta of -0.71, indicating that its share price is 171% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Nuvectis Pharma has a beta of -0.07, indicating that its share price is 107% less volatile than the broader market.

Cassava Sciences' return on equity of -53.90% beat Nuvectis Pharma's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cassava SciencesN/A -53.90% -34.20%
Nuvectis Pharma N/A -161.00%-98.88%

In the previous week, Nuvectis Pharma had 2 more articles in the media than Cassava Sciences. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Nuvectis Pharma and 0 mentions for Cassava Sciences. Nuvectis Pharma's average media sentiment score of 1.31 beat Cassava Sciences' score of 0.93 indicating that Nuvectis Pharma is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cassava Sciences Positive
Nuvectis Pharma Positive

Nuvectis Pharma is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cassava Sciences, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cassava SciencesN/AN/A-$90.97M-$1.61N/A
Nuvectis PharmaN/AN/A-$26.44M-$1.31N/A

38.1% of Cassava Sciences shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.8% of Nuvectis Pharma shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.6% of Cassava Sciences shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 28.6% of Nuvectis Pharma shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Cassava Sciences currently has a consensus target price of $5.00, indicating a potential upside of 313.22%. Nuvectis Pharma has a consensus target price of $13.00, indicating a potential upside of 3.26%. Given Cassava Sciences' higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Cassava Sciences is more favorable than Nuvectis Pharma.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cassava Sciences
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Nuvectis Pharma
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Summary

Nuvectis Pharma beats Cassava Sciences on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cassava Sciences compare to MacroGenics?

Cassava Sciences (NASDAQ:FLNA) and MacroGenics (NASDAQ:MGNX) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Cassava Sciences presently has a consensus target price of $5.00, suggesting a potential upside of 313.22%. MacroGenics has a consensus target price of $5.50, suggesting a potential upside of 38.89%. Given Cassava Sciences' higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Cassava Sciences is more favorable than MacroGenics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cassava Sciences
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
MacroGenics
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.29

In the previous week, MacroGenics had 2 more articles in the media than Cassava Sciences. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for MacroGenics and 0 mentions for Cassava Sciences. Cassava Sciences' average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat MacroGenics' score of 0.63 indicating that Cassava Sciences is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cassava Sciences Positive
MacroGenics Positive

Cassava Sciences has a net margin of 0.00% compared to MacroGenics' net margin of -44.79%. Cassava Sciences' return on equity of -53.90% beat MacroGenics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cassava SciencesN/A -53.90% -34.20%
MacroGenics -44.79%-147.80%-28.40%

Cassava Sciences has a beta of -0.71, suggesting that its share price is 171% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MacroGenics has a beta of 1.18, suggesting that its share price is 18% more volatile than the broader market.

MacroGenics has higher revenue and earnings than Cassava Sciences. MacroGenics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cassava Sciences, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cassava SciencesN/AN/A-$90.97M-$1.61N/A
MacroGenics$149.50M1.68-$74.62M-$1.10N/A

38.1% of Cassava Sciences shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.9% of MacroGenics shares are held by institutional investors. 4.6% of Cassava Sciences shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 13.6% of MacroGenics shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

MacroGenics beats Cassava Sciences on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Cassava Sciences News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FLNA and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FLNA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FLNA vs. The Competition

MetricCassava SciencesMED IndustryMedical SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$58.46M$2.96B$6.42B$12.05B
Dividend YieldN/A1.76%2.67%5.64%
P/E Ratio-0.7518.7124.5624.10
Price / SalesN/A312.98492.3488.92
Price / CashN/A56.5944.1356.69
Price / Book0.794.0410.616.64
Net Income-$90.97M$75.79M$3.57B$337.89M
7 Day Performance-8.33%2.54%1.56%1.73%
1 Month Performance2.54%0.11%2.08%3.16%
1 Year Performance-41.55%24.52%27.77%29.83%

Cassava Sciences Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FLNA
Cassava Sciences
1.6812 of 5 stars
$1.21
-0.8%
$5.00
+313.2%
-40.5%$58.46MN/AN/A20
IMRX
Immuneering
2.6406 of 5 stars
$4.12
-3.6%
$16.50
+301.0%
+73.0%$266.89MN/AN/A60
ZNTL
Zentalis Pharmaceuticals
2.339 of 5 stars
$3.70
+1.1%
$5.83
+57.7%
+133.1%$263.74MN/AN/A160
EDIT
Editas Medicine
3.0115 of 5 stars
$2.65
-2.4%
$5.40
+104.2%
+9.3%$259.94M$38.69MN/A230
NVCT
Nuvectis Pharma
0.9226 of 5 stars
$9.55
+0.1%
$10.00
+4.7%
+38.2%$253.36MN/AN/A8

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:FLNA) was last updated on 6/17/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners