Free Trial

Tucows (TCX) Competitors

Tucows logo
$15.16 +0.06 (+0.40%)
Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$15.21 +0.05 (+0.33%)
As of 04:04 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

TCX vs. RMR, DDI, PHR, CARS, and BWMN

Should you buy Tucows stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Tucows with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Tucows include The RMR Group (RMR), DoubleDown Interactive (DDI), Phreesia (PHR), Cars.com (CARS), and Bowman Consulting Group (BWMN). These companies are all part of the "business services" industry.

How does Tucows compare to The RMR Group?

The RMR Group (NASDAQ:RMR) and Tucows (NASDAQ:TCX) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, risk, dividends and earnings.

The RMR Group presently has a consensus target price of $19.00, suggesting a potential downside of 4.76%. Given The RMR Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe The RMR Group is more favorable than Tucows.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
The RMR Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Tucows
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

The RMR Group has a net margin of 3.23% compared to Tucows' net margin of -20.08%. The RMR Group's return on equity of 3.44% beat Tucows' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
The RMR Group3.23% 3.44% 2.05%
Tucows -20.08%N/A -9.18%

42.3% of The RMR Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.6% of Tucows shares are held by institutional investors. 54.7% of The RMR Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 9.4% of Tucows shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

The RMR Group has higher revenue and earnings than Tucows. Tucows is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The RMR Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The RMR Group$700.28M0.91$17.60M$1.2116.49
Tucows$390.30M0.43-$75.82M-$7.10N/A

In the previous week, Tucows had 1 more articles in the media than The RMR Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Tucows and 2 mentions for The RMR Group. The RMR Group's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Tucows' score of 0.59 indicating that The RMR Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
The RMR Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Tucows
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

The RMR Group has a beta of 1.03, meaning that its share price is 3% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tucows has a beta of 0.9, meaning that its share price is 10% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

The RMR Group beats Tucows on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tucows compare to DoubleDown Interactive?

Tucows (NASDAQ:TCX) and DoubleDown Interactive (NASDAQ:DDI) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings, dividends and valuation.

Tucows has a beta of 0.9, suggesting that its share price is 10% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, DoubleDown Interactive has a beta of 1.01, suggesting that its share price is 1% more volatile than the broader market.

DoubleDown Interactive has a consensus price target of $15.67, indicating a potential upside of 33.90%. Given DoubleDown Interactive's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe DoubleDown Interactive is more favorable than Tucows.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Tucows
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
DoubleDown Interactive
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

DoubleDown Interactive has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Tucows. Tucows is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than DoubleDown Interactive, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tucows$390.30M0.43-$75.82M-$7.10N/A
DoubleDown Interactive$359.94M1.61$102.50M$2.305.09

DoubleDown Interactive has a net margin of 30.77% compared to Tucows' net margin of -20.08%. DoubleDown Interactive's return on equity of 12.16% beat Tucows' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tucows-20.08% N/A -9.18%
DoubleDown Interactive 30.77%12.16%11.12%

73.6% of Tucows shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.4% of Tucows shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Tucows and Tucows both had 3 articles in the media. Tucows' average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat DoubleDown Interactive's score of 0.29 indicating that Tucows is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Tucows
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
DoubleDown Interactive
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

DoubleDown Interactive beats Tucows on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tucows compare to Phreesia?

Tucows (NASDAQ:TCX) and Phreesia (NYSE:PHR) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, earnings, risk, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Phreesia has a net margin of 1.85% compared to Tucows' net margin of -20.08%. Phreesia's return on equity of 5.30% beat Tucows' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tucows-20.08% N/A -9.18%
Phreesia 1.85%5.30%3.38%

Phreesia has a consensus target price of $16.65, suggesting a potential upside of 69.89%. Given Phreesia's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Phreesia is more favorable than Tucows.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Tucows
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Phreesia
1 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.42

73.6% of Tucows shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.1% of Phreesia shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.4% of Tucows shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.2% of Phreesia shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Phreesia has higher revenue and earnings than Tucows. Tucows is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Phreesia, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tucows$390.30M0.43-$75.82M-$7.10N/A
Phreesia$480.59M1.26$2.31M$0.03326.63

In the previous week, Phreesia had 38 more articles in the media than Tucows. MarketBeat recorded 41 mentions for Phreesia and 3 mentions for Tucows. Tucows' average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat Phreesia's score of 0.14 indicating that Tucows is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Tucows
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Phreesia
4 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
25 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
3 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Tucows has a beta of 0.9, suggesting that its share price is 10% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Phreesia has a beta of 0.89, suggesting that its share price is 11% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Phreesia beats Tucows on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tucows compare to Cars.com?

Tucows (NASDAQ:TCX) and Cars.com (NYSE:CARS) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability and dividends.

Cars.com has a consensus price target of $14.67, suggesting a potential upside of 42.60%. Given Cars.com's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Cars.com is more favorable than Tucows.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Tucows
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Cars.com
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Cars.com has a net margin of 3.73% compared to Tucows' net margin of -20.08%. Cars.com's return on equity of 18.12% beat Tucows' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tucows-20.08% N/A -9.18%
Cars.com 3.73%18.12%8.07%

In the previous week, Tucows had 3 more articles in the media than Cars.com. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Tucows and 0 mentions for Cars.com. Tucows' average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat Cars.com's score of 0.00 indicating that Tucows is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tucows Positive
Cars.com Neutral

Tucows has a beta of 0.9, indicating that its share price is 10% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cars.com has a beta of 1.64, indicating that its share price is 64% more volatile than the broader market.

Cars.com has higher revenue and earnings than Tucows. Tucows is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cars.com, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tucows$390.30M0.43-$75.82M-$7.10N/A
Cars.com$723.24M0.79$20.05M$0.4323.92

73.6% of Tucows shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.2% of Cars.com shares are held by institutional investors. 9.4% of Tucows shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.4% of Cars.com shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Cars.com beats Tucows on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tucows compare to Bowman Consulting Group?

Bowman Consulting Group (NASDAQ:BWMN) and Tucows (NASDAQ:TCX) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, profitability, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Bowman Consulting Group currently has a consensus target price of $47.50, indicating a potential upside of 50.65%. Given Bowman Consulting Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Bowman Consulting Group is more favorable than Tucows.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Bowman Consulting Group
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Tucows
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Bowman Consulting Group has higher revenue and earnings than Tucows. Tucows is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bowman Consulting Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Bowman Consulting Group$490.02M1.13$12.85M$0.6052.55
Tucows$390.30M0.43-$75.82M-$7.10N/A

Bowman Consulting Group has a beta of 1.36, indicating that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tucows has a beta of 0.9, indicating that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the broader market.

63.2% of Bowman Consulting Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.6% of Tucows shares are held by institutional investors. 17.5% of Bowman Consulting Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.4% of Tucows shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Tucows had 1 more articles in the media than Bowman Consulting Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Tucows and 2 mentions for Bowman Consulting Group. Bowman Consulting Group's average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat Tucows' score of 0.59 indicating that Bowman Consulting Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Bowman Consulting Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Tucows
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Bowman Consulting Group has a net margin of 2.02% compared to Tucows' net margin of -20.08%. Bowman Consulting Group's return on equity of 3.98% beat Tucows' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Bowman Consulting Group2.02% 3.98% 1.84%
Tucows -20.08%N/A -9.18%

Summary

Bowman Consulting Group beats Tucows on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Tucows News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TCX and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TCX and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

TCX vs. The Competition

MetricTucowsINTERNET CONTENT IndustryComputer SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$169.03M$2.62B$40.25B$12.59B
Dividend YieldN/A7.73%3.18%5.26%
P/E Ratio-2.145.5080.0426.28
Price / Sales0.431.85624.59114.49
Price / CashN/A8.7548.6856.90
Price / Book-0.933.2710.757.34
Net Income-$75.82M$130.71M$1.06B$336.95M
7 Day Performance0.93%-0.33%3.62%3.39%
1 Month Performance-3.19%32.29%12.39%7.17%
1 Year Performance-22.69%-10.79%170.23%37.87%

Tucows Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TCX
Tucows
0.1412 of 5 stars
$15.16
+0.4%
N/A-20.7%$169.03M$390.30MN/A1,000
RMR
The RMR Group
2.6428 of 5 stars
$19.43
+0.3%
$19.00
-2.2%
+37.5%$623.51M$700.28M16.06600
DDI
DoubleDown Interactive
4.0405 of 5 stars
$12.12
-1.1%
$15.67
+29.3%
+19.6%$600.55M$359.94M5.27220
PHR
Phreesia
4.2212 of 5 stars
$9.15
+0.8%
$20.00
+118.6%
-59.5%$565.20M$480.59M305.001,789
CARS
Cars.com
3.6462 of 5 stars
$9.78
-2.5%
$14.67
+50.0%
-0.8%$546.42M$723.24M22.731,700

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:TCX) was last updated on 5/29/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners