Vroom (VRMMQ) Competitors

25.8% of Vroom shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.6% of Beam Global shares are held by institutional investors. 2.7% of Vroom shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.6% of Beam Global shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Beam Global had 2 more articles in the media than Vroom. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Beam Global and 0 mentions for Vroom. Vroom's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Beam Global'saverage media sentiment score.

Beam Global has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Vroom. Beam Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vroom, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Beam Global has a consensus price target of $4.00, suggesting a potential upside of 112.77%. Given Beam Global's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Beam Global is more favorable than Vroom.

Vroom has a net margin of -69.36% compared to Beam Global's net margin of -95.63%. Beam Global's return on equity of -61.84% beat Vroom's return on equity.

Vroom has a beta of 1.67, indicating that its stock price is 67% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Beam Global has a beta of 1.48, indicating that its stock price is 48% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Vroom has a beta of 1.67, suggesting that its stock price is 67% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Latch has a beta of 1.46, suggesting that its stock price is 46% more volatile than the S&P 500.

25.8% of Vroom shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.4% of Latch shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.7% of Vroom shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 27.5% of Latch shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Latch has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Vroom's net margin of -69.36%. Latch's return on equity of 0.00% beat Vroom's return on equity.

Latch has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Vroom. Latch is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vroom, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Vroom's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Latch'saverage media sentiment score.

Westport Fuel Systems has a beta of 2.14, meaning that its share price is 114% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Vroom has a beta of 1.67, meaning that its share price is 67% more volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Westport Fuel Systems had 8 more articles in the media than Vroom. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Westport Fuel Systems and 0 mentions for Vroom. Westport Fuel Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat Vroom's score of 0.00 indicating that Westport Fuel Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Westport Fuel Systems presently has a consensus target price of $4.38, indicating a potential upside of 118.75%. Given Westport Fuel Systems' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Westport Fuel Systems is more favorable than Vroom.

21.3% of Westport Fuel Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.8% of Vroom shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Westport Fuel Systems shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.7% of Vroom shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Westport Fuel Systems has a net margin of -37.73% compared to Vroom's net margin of -69.36%. Westport Fuel Systems' return on equity of -27.03% beat Vroom's return on equity.

Westport Fuel Systems has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Vroom. Westport Fuel Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vroom, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Vroom'saverage media sentiment score.

71.7% of Faraday Future Intelligent Electric shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.8% of Vroom shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Faraday Future Intelligent Electric shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.7% of Vroom shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has a beta of 4.8, suggesting that its share price is 380% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Vroom has a beta of 1.67, suggesting that its share price is 67% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Vroom has higher revenue and earnings than Faraday Future Intelligent Electric. Vroom is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Vroom has a net margin of -69.36% compared to Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's net margin of -59,289.57%. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's return on equity of -118.78% beat Vroom's return on equity.