Free Trial
Your $100 Credit Expires Tomorrow! Get MarketBeat All Access
  • 0Days
  • 0Hours
  • 0Minutes
  • 0Seconds
Don't Miss Out
Claim MarketBeat All Access Sale Promotion

Beam Global (BEEM) Competitors

Beam Global logo
$1.43 -0.01 (-0.69%)
Closing price 05/22/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$1.38 -0.04 (-3.15%)
As of 05/22/2026 07:39 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

BEEM vs. WATT, GCTS, SPWR, CODA, and REKR

Should you buy Beam Global stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Beam Global with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Beam Global include Energous (WATT), GCT Semiconductor (GCTS), CSLM Acquisition (SPWR), Coda Octopus Group (CODA), and Rekor Systems (REKR). These companies are all part of the "electronic equipment" industry.

How does Beam Global compare to Energous?

Beam Global (NASDAQ:BEEM) and Energous (NASDAQ:WATT) are both small-cap electronic equipment companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, risk, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

26.6% of Beam Global shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.4% of Energous shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.6% of Beam Global shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Energous shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Beam Global
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67
Energous
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50

Energous has a net margin of -0.80% compared to Beam Global's net margin of -73.22%. Energous' return on equity of -39.80% beat Beam Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Beam Global-73.22% -73.50% -42.14%
Energous -0.80%-39.80%-33.46%

In the previous week, Beam Global had 5 more articles in the media than Energous. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Beam Global and 0 mentions for Energous. Energous' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Beam Global's score of -0.31 indicating that Energous is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Beam Global Neutral
Energous Neutral

Energous has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Beam Global. Energous is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Beam Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Beam Global$25.04M1.27-$27M-$0.96N/A
Energous$5.63M28.56-$9.59M-$4.10N/A

Beam Global has a beta of 1.48, suggesting that its share price is 48% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Energous has a beta of 1.61, suggesting that its share price is 61% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Beam Global and Energous tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Beam Global compare to GCT Semiconductor?

Beam Global (NASDAQ:BEEM) and GCT Semiconductor (NYSE:GCTS) are both small-cap electronic equipment companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, risk, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Beam Global has higher revenue and earnings than GCT Semiconductor. GCT Semiconductor is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Beam Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Beam Global$25.04M1.27-$27M-$0.96N/A
GCT Semiconductor$2.87M85.73-$43.37M-$0.81N/A

In the previous week, GCT Semiconductor had 3 more articles in the media than Beam Global. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for GCT Semiconductor and 5 mentions for Beam Global. GCT Semiconductor's average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Beam Global's score of -0.31 indicating that GCT Semiconductor is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Beam Global
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
GCT Semiconductor
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Beam Global has a net margin of -73.22% compared to GCT Semiconductor's net margin of -1,078.51%. GCT Semiconductor's return on equity of 0.00% beat Beam Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Beam Global-73.22% -73.50% -42.14%
GCT Semiconductor -1,078.51%N/A -231.58%

26.6% of Beam Global shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.1% of GCT Semiconductor shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.6% of Beam Global shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.4% of GCT Semiconductor shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Beam Global has a beta of 1.48, meaning that its share price is 48% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, GCT Semiconductor has a beta of 1.27, meaning that its share price is 27% more volatile than the broader market.

GCT Semiconductor has a consensus price target of $3.50, indicating a potential upside of 3.09%. Given GCT Semiconductor's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe GCT Semiconductor is more favorable than Beam Global.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Beam Global
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67
GCT Semiconductor
2 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Summary

GCT Semiconductor beats Beam Global on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Beam Global compare to CSLM Acquisition?

CSLM Acquisition (NASDAQ:SPWR) and Beam Global (NASDAQ:BEEM) are both small-cap electronic equipment companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, earnings and risk.

CSLM Acquisition currently has a consensus price target of $5.40, suggesting a potential upside of 382.14%. Given CSLM Acquisition's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe CSLM Acquisition is more favorable than Beam Global.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CSLM Acquisition
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Beam Global
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67

In the previous week, Beam Global had 4 more articles in the media than CSLM Acquisition. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Beam Global and 1 mentions for CSLM Acquisition. Beam Global's average media sentiment score of -0.31 beat CSLM Acquisition's score of -0.31 indicating that Beam Global is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
CSLM Acquisition
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Beam Global
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

CSLM Acquisition has a net margin of -14.34% compared to Beam Global's net margin of -73.22%. CSLM Acquisition's return on equity of -16.64% beat Beam Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CSLM Acquisition-14.34% -16.64% -19.80%
Beam Global -73.22%-73.50%-42.14%

CSLM Acquisition has a beta of 0.51, indicating that its share price is 49% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Beam Global has a beta of 1.48, indicating that its share price is 48% more volatile than the broader market.

Beam Global has lower revenue, but higher earnings than CSLM Acquisition. CSLM Acquisition is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Beam Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CSLM Acquisition$300M0.47-$45.35M-$0.47N/A
Beam Global$25.04M1.27-$27M-$0.96N/A

47.4% of CSLM Acquisition shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.6% of Beam Global shares are owned by institutional investors. 42.6% of CSLM Acquisition shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.6% of Beam Global shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

CSLM Acquisition beats Beam Global on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Beam Global compare to Coda Octopus Group?

Beam Global (NASDAQ:BEEM) and Coda Octopus Group (NASDAQ:CODA) are both small-cap electronic equipment companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

26.6% of Beam Global shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.1% of Coda Octopus Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.6% of Beam Global shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 21.8% of Coda Octopus Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Beam Global
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67
Coda Octopus Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Beam Global has a beta of 1.48, indicating that its share price is 48% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Coda Octopus Group has a beta of 0.54, indicating that its share price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

Coda Octopus Group has higher revenue and earnings than Beam Global. Beam Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Coda Octopus Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Beam Global$25.04M1.27-$27M-$0.96N/A
Coda Octopus Group$26.56M5.04$4.13M$0.3632.97

In the previous week, Beam Global had 5 more articles in the media than Coda Octopus Group. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Beam Global and 0 mentions for Coda Octopus Group. Coda Octopus Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Beam Global's score of -0.31 indicating that Coda Octopus Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Beam Global Neutral
Coda Octopus Group Neutral

Coda Octopus Group has a net margin of 14.78% compared to Beam Global's net margin of -73.22%. Coda Octopus Group's return on equity of 7.17% beat Beam Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Beam Global-73.22% -73.50% -42.14%
Coda Octopus Group 14.78%7.17%6.57%

Summary

Coda Octopus Group beats Beam Global on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Beam Global compare to Rekor Systems?

Rekor Systems (NASDAQ:REKR) and Beam Global (NASDAQ:BEEM) are both small-cap electronic equipment companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, risk, dividends, media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Beam Global has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Rekor Systems. Rekor Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Beam Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Rekor Systems$48.45M2.18-$31.46M-$0.23N/A
Beam Global$25.04M1.27-$27M-$0.96N/A

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Rekor Systems
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Beam Global
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67

In the previous week, Beam Global had 5 more articles in the media than Rekor Systems. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Beam Global and 0 mentions for Rekor Systems. Rekor Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Beam Global's score of -0.31 indicating that Rekor Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Rekor Systems Neutral
Beam Global Neutral

Rekor Systems has a beta of 1.83, suggesting that its stock price is 83% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Beam Global has a beta of 1.48, suggesting that its stock price is 48% more volatile than the broader market.

Rekor Systems has a net margin of -60.48% compared to Beam Global's net margin of -73.22%. Beam Global's return on equity of -73.50% beat Rekor Systems' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Rekor Systems-60.48% -80.28% -36.87%
Beam Global -73.22%-73.50%-42.14%

45.7% of Rekor Systems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.6% of Beam Global shares are held by institutional investors. 3.2% of Rekor Systems shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.6% of Beam Global shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Rekor Systems beats Beam Global on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Beam Global News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BEEM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BEEM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BEEM vs. The Competition

MetricBeam GlobalAUTO/TRUCK IndustryAuto SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$31.75M$5.92B$22.38B$12.33B
Dividend YieldN/A2.13%2.61%5.28%
P/E Ratio-1.4922.3021.6625.67
Price / Sales1.2724.0618.7682.73
Price / CashN/A11.3511.7556.73
Price / Book1.473.002.587.14
Net Income-$27M$184.20M$333.18M$335.80M
7 Day Performance-17.34%1.17%1.08%3.02%
1 Month Performance-25.91%-2.39%0.23%2.48%
1 Year Performance-13.86%19.85%5.14%35.08%

Beam Global Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BEEM
Beam Global
0.7228 of 5 stars
$1.43
-0.7%
N/A-13.9%$31.75M$25.04MN/A90
WATT
Energous
0.8605 of 5 stars
$23.76
-3.1%
N/A+248.7%$134.89M$5.63MN/A50
GCTS
GCT Semiconductor
1.6968 of 5 stars
$2.56
+40.0%
$3.50
+36.6%
+223.3%$132.62M$2.87MN/AN/A
SPWR
CSLM Acquisition
1.5347 of 5 stars
$1.03
+1.0%
$5.40
+424.3%
N/A$129.19M$290.05MN/A151
CODA
Coda Octopus Group
1.5321 of 5 stars
$11.43
flat
N/A+63.7%$128.89M$26.56M31.7580

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:BEEM) was last updated on 5/24/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners