Go Pro

Beam Global (BEEM) Competitors

Beam Global logo
$1.15 -0.01 (-0.86%)
Closing price 08/13/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$1.15 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 04:12 AM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

BEEM vs. NEOV, ULBI, BLNK, SPWR, and WBX

Should you buy Beam Global stock or one of its competitors? Beam Global's main competitors and comparable companies include NeoVolta (NEOV), Ultralife (ULBI), Blink Charging (BLNK), CSLM Acquisition (SPWR), and Wallbox (WBX). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "electrical components & equipment" industry.

How does Beam Global compare to NeoVolta?

Beam Global (NASDAQ:BEEM) and NeoVolta (NASDAQ:NEOV) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, risk and media sentiment.

26.6% of Beam Global shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.1% of NeoVolta shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.6% of Beam Global shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.0% of NeoVolta shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Beam Global has a beta of 1.43, meaning that its share price is 43% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, NeoVolta has a beta of -1.02, meaning that its share price is 202% less volatile than the broader market.

NeoVolta has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Beam Global. NeoVolta is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Beam Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Beam Global$28.24M0.90-$27M-$0.96N/A
NeoVolta$8.43M17.43-$5.03M-$0.33N/A

NeoVolta has a net margin of -63.35% compared to Beam Global's net margin of -73.22%. Beam Global's return on equity of -73.50% beat NeoVolta's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Beam Global-73.22% -73.50% -42.14%
NeoVolta -63.35%-141.89%-89.61%

In the previous week, Beam Global had 1 more articles in the media than NeoVolta. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Beam Global and 2 mentions for NeoVolta. NeoVolta's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Beam Global's score of 0.63 indicating that NeoVolta is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Beam Global
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
NeoVolta
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

NeoVolta has a consensus target price of $9.50, indicating a potential upside of 176.16%. Given NeoVolta's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe NeoVolta is more favorable than Beam Global.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Beam Global
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
NeoVolta
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Summary

Beam Global beats NeoVolta on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Beam Global compare to Ultralife?

Beam Global (NASDAQ:BEEM) and Ultralife (NASDAQ:ULBI) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and risk.

Ultralife has higher revenue and earnings than Beam Global. Ultralife is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Beam Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Beam Global$28.24M0.90-$27M-$0.96N/A
Ultralife$191.16M0.65-$5.90M-$0.40N/A

Beam Global has a beta of 1.43, meaning that its share price is 43% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ultralife has a beta of 0.8, meaning that its share price is 20% less volatile than the broader market.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Beam Global
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Ultralife
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

26.6% of Beam Global shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.7% of Ultralife shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.6% of Beam Global shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 42.9% of Ultralife shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Ultralife has a net margin of -3.50% compared to Beam Global's net margin of -73.22%. Ultralife's return on equity of 2.75% beat Beam Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Beam Global-73.22% -73.50% -42.14%
Ultralife -3.50%2.75%1.66%

In the previous week, Ultralife had 4 more articles in the media than Beam Global. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Ultralife and 3 mentions for Beam Global. Ultralife's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Beam Global's score of 0.63 indicating that Ultralife is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Beam Global
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Ultralife
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Ultralife beats Beam Global on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Beam Global compare to Blink Charging?

Blink Charging (NASDAQ:BLNK) and Beam Global (NASDAQ:BEEM) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Blink Charging has a net margin of -52.24% compared to Beam Global's net margin of -73.22%. Blink Charging's return on equity of -53.40% beat Beam Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Blink Charging-52.24% -53.40% -24.73%
Beam Global -73.22%-73.50%-42.14%

Blink Charging currently has a consensus price target of $2.50, indicating a potential upside of 315.97%. Given Blink Charging's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Blink Charging is more favorable than Beam Global.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Blink Charging
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Beam Global
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

44.6% of Blink Charging shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.6% of Beam Global shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of Blink Charging shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.6% of Beam Global shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Beam Global has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Blink Charging. Blink Charging is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Beam Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Blink Charging$103.52M0.84-$83.39M-$0.40N/A
Beam Global$28.24M0.90-$27M-$0.96N/A

In the previous week, Blink Charging had 7 more articles in the media than Beam Global. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Blink Charging and 3 mentions for Beam Global. Beam Global's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Blink Charging's score of -0.19 indicating that Beam Global is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Blink Charging
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Beam Global
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Blink Charging has a beta of 2.05, suggesting that its stock price is 105% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Beam Global has a beta of 1.43, suggesting that its stock price is 43% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Blink Charging beats Beam Global on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Beam Global compare to CSLM Acquisition?

CSLM Acquisition (NASDAQ:SPWR) and Beam Global (NASDAQ:BEEM) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk and earnings.

47.4% of CSLM Acquisition shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.6% of Beam Global shares are owned by institutional investors. 42.6% of CSLM Acquisition shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.6% of Beam Global shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

CSLM Acquisition currently has a consensus target price of $5.40, indicating a potential upside of 2,130.48%. Given CSLM Acquisition's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe CSLM Acquisition is more favorable than Beam Global.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CSLM Acquisition
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Beam Global
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Beam Global has lower revenue, but higher earnings than CSLM Acquisition. Beam Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CSLM Acquisition, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CSLM Acquisition$300M0.17-$45.35M-$0.47N/A
Beam Global$28.24M0.90-$27M-$0.96N/A

In the previous week, Beam Global had 2 more articles in the media than CSLM Acquisition. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Beam Global and 1 mentions for CSLM Acquisition. CSLM Acquisition's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Beam Global's score of 0.63 indicating that CSLM Acquisition is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
CSLM Acquisition Very Positive
Beam Global Positive

CSLM Acquisition has a net margin of -14.34% compared to Beam Global's net margin of -73.22%. CSLM Acquisition's return on equity of 0.00% beat Beam Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CSLM Acquisition-14.34% N/A -19.80%
Beam Global -73.22%-73.50%-42.14%

CSLM Acquisition has a beta of 0.71, meaning that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Beam Global has a beta of 1.43, meaning that its share price is 43% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

CSLM Acquisition beats Beam Global on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Beam Global compare to Wallbox?

Wallbox (NYSE:WBX) and Beam Global (NASDAQ:BEEM) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, risk, valuation, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Beam Global has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Wallbox.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Wallbox$164.15M0.32-$115.14MN/AN/A
Beam Global$28.24M0.90-$27M-$0.96N/A

In the previous week, Beam Global had 3 more articles in the media than Wallbox. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Beam Global and 0 mentions for Wallbox. Beam Global's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Wallbox's score of 0.00 indicating that Beam Global is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Wallbox Neutral
Beam Global Positive

36.9% of Wallbox shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.6% of Beam Global shares are owned by institutional investors. 33.3% of Wallbox shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.6% of Beam Global shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Wallbox has a beta of 2.02, indicating that its stock price is 102% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Beam Global has a beta of 1.43, indicating that its stock price is 43% more volatile than the broader market.

Wallbox has a net margin of -70.12% compared to Beam Global's net margin of -73.22%. Beam Global's return on equity of -73.50% beat Wallbox's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Wallbox-70.12% -6,451.74% -55.57%
Beam Global -73.22%-73.50%-42.14%

Wallbox currently has a consensus target price of $4.33, indicating a potential upside of 42.78%. Given Wallbox's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Wallbox is more favorable than Beam Global.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Wallbox
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
Beam Global
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Summary

Wallbox beats Beam Global on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Beam Global News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BEEM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BEEM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BEEM vs. The Competition

MetricBeam GlobalElectrical Equipment IndustryIndustrials SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$25.75M$11.34B$10.93B$12.99B
Dividend YieldN/A2.29%97.00%10.72%
P/E Ratio-1.2050.4628.1825.23
Price / Sales0.901,619.17348.92101.16
Price / CashN/A31.4724.8950.75
Price / Book0.885.444.576.24
Net Income-$27M$134.38M$607.65M$347.70M
7 Day Performance0.88%1.69%0.80%0.90%
1 Month Performance8.49%-1.28%3.15%0.91%
1 Year Performance-51.68%23.41%13.91%20.09%

Beam Global Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BEEM
Beam Global
1.3165 of 5 stars
$1.15
-0.9%
N/A-52.5%$25.75M$28.24MN/A90
NEOV
NeoVolta
3.8373 of 5 stars
$2.47
+17.1%
$9.50
+284.6%
-15.9%$90.12M$8.43MN/A5
ULBI
Ultralife
1.9492 of 5 stars
$5.25
+1.2%
N/A+8.8%$86.45M$187.86MN/A560
BLNK
Blink Charging
1.1081 of 5 stars
$0.54
+5.0%
$5.00
+821.1%
-36.1%$74.28M$103.52MN/A200
SPWR
CSLM Acquisition
2.2808 of 5 stars
$0.30
+0.6%
$5.40
+1,682.2%
-85.1%$64.98M$300MN/A151

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:BEEM) was last updated on 8/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners