SuperCom Competitors

SuperCom (NASDAQ:SPCB) and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (NYSE:TSM) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings and profitability.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

14.0% of SuperCom shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.3% of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares SuperCom and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing has higher revenue and earnings than SuperCom.

Profitability

This table compares SuperCom and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk and Volatility

SuperCom has a beta of 0.38, suggesting that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing has a beta of 0.99, suggesting that its stock price is 1% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for SuperCom and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing, as provided by MarketBeat.

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing has a consensus price target of $106.75, suggesting a potential downside of 7.13%. Given Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing is more favorable than SuperCom.

Summary

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing beats SuperCom on 11 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

SuperCom (NASDAQ:SPCB) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) are both industrial products companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability and earnings.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

14.0% of SuperCom shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.7% of NVIDIA shares are held by institutional investors. 4.5% of NVIDIA shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares SuperCom and NVIDIA's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

NVIDIA has higher revenue and earnings than SuperCom.

Profitability

This table compares SuperCom and NVIDIA's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk and Volatility

SuperCom has a beta of 0.38, suggesting that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, NVIDIA has a beta of 1.45, suggesting that its stock price is 45% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for SuperCom and NVIDIA, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

NVIDIA has a consensus price target of $607.7429, suggesting a potential upside of 0.15%. Given NVIDIA's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe NVIDIA is more favorable than SuperCom.

Summary

NVIDIA beats SuperCom on 12 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

SuperCom (NASDAQ:SPCB) and Intel (NASDAQ:INTC) are both industrial products companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares SuperCom and Intel's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

14.0% of SuperCom shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.3% of Intel shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of Intel shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares SuperCom and Intel's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Intel has higher revenue and earnings than SuperCom.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for SuperCom and Intel, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Intel has a consensus price target of $63.60, suggesting a potential upside of 1.44%. Given Intel's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Intel is more favorable than SuperCom.

Risk and Volatility

SuperCom has a beta of 0.38, suggesting that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Intel has a beta of 0.74, suggesting that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Intel beats SuperCom on 11 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) and SuperCom (NASDAQ:SPCB) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Broadcom and SuperCom, as reported by MarketBeat.

Broadcom presently has a consensus target price of $470.36, suggesting a potential upside of 2.86%. Given Broadcom's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Broadcom is more favorable than SuperCom.

Profitability

This table compares Broadcom and SuperCom's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

80.6% of Broadcom shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.0% of SuperCom shares are held by institutional investors. 3.0% of Broadcom shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility & Risk

Broadcom has a beta of 1.05, meaning that its share price is 5% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, SuperCom has a beta of 0.38, meaning that its share price is 62% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Broadcom and SuperCom's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Broadcom has higher revenue and earnings than SuperCom.

Summary

Broadcom beats SuperCom on 11 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

SuperCom (NASDAQ:SPCB) and Texas Instruments (NASDAQ:TXN) are both industrial products companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for SuperCom and Texas Instruments, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Texas Instruments has a consensus target price of $173.5185, suggesting a potential downside of 6.34%. Given Texas Instruments' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Texas Instruments is more favorable than SuperCom.

Profitability

This table compares SuperCom and Texas Instruments' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

14.0% of SuperCom shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.1% of Texas Instruments shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Texas Instruments shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk and Volatility

SuperCom has a beta of 0.38, meaning that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Texas Instruments has a beta of 1.06, meaning that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares SuperCom and Texas Instruments' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Texas Instruments has higher revenue and earnings than SuperCom.

Summary

Texas Instruments beats SuperCom on 11 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

SuperCom (NASDAQ:SPCB) and Applied Materials (NASDAQ:AMAT) are both industrial products companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for SuperCom and Applied Materials, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Applied Materials has a consensus target price of $144.44, suggesting a potential upside of 12.33%. Given Applied Materials' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Applied Materials is more favorable than SuperCom.

Profitability

This table compares SuperCom and Applied Materials' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

14.0% of SuperCom shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 78.8% of Applied Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Applied Materials shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk and Volatility

SuperCom has a beta of 0.38, meaning that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Applied Materials has a beta of 1.48, meaning that its stock price is 48% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares SuperCom and Applied Materials' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Applied Materials has higher revenue and earnings than SuperCom.

Summary

Applied Materials beats SuperCom on 11 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.