Do analysts recommend WFF or TRSG?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score WF 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Tungray Technologies 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Which has higher earnings & valuation, WFF or TRSG?

Tungray Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than WF. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio WF $7.40M 0.94 -$4.77M N/A N/A Tungray Technologies $15.62M 1.60 -$10K N/A N/A

Is WFF or TRSG more profitable?

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets WF N/A N/A N/A Tungray Technologies N/A N/A N/A

Do analysts recommend WFF or LIQT?

LiqTech International has a consensus target price of $1.30, suggesting a potential upside of 82.10%. Given LiqTech International's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe LiqTech International is more favorable than WF. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score WF 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 LiqTech International 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, WFF or LIQT?

WF has higher earnings, but lower revenue than LiqTech International. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio WF $7.40M 0.94 -$4.77M N/A N/A LiqTech International $16.51M 1.42 -$8.60M -$0.84 N/A

Do analysts prefer GTEC or WFF?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Greenland Technologies 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 WF 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Which has better earnings & valuation, GTEC or WFF?

Greenland Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than WF. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Greenland Technologies $102.71M 0.21 $4.93M $0.58 1.81 WF $7.40M 0.94 -$4.77M N/A N/A

Do analysts recommend RETO or WFF?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score ReTo Eco-Solutions 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 WF 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Which has better valuation and earnings, RETO or WFF?

WF has higher revenue and earnings than ReTo Eco-Solutions. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio ReTo Eco-Solutions $3.37M 4.13 -$12.34M N/A N/A WF $7.40M 0.94 -$4.77M N/A N/A

Is RETO or WFF more profitable?

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets ReTo Eco-Solutions N/A N/A N/A WF N/A N/A N/A

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, TOMZ or WFF?

TOMI Environmental Solutions has higher earnings, but lower revenue than WF. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio TOMI Environmental Solutions $6.93M 1.90 -$3.75M -$0.50 N/A WF $7.40M 0.94 -$4.77M N/A N/A

WF (WFF) Competitors

$2.03 +0.17 (+9.14%)

Closing price 09/11/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$1.97 -0.06 (-2.96%)

As of 09/11/2026 07:58 PM Eastern

Compare

WFF vs. TRSG, LIQT, GTEC, RETO, and TOMZ

Should you buy WF stock or one of its competitors? WF's main competitors and comparable companies include Tungray Technologies (TRSG), LiqTech International (LIQT), Greenland Technologies (GTEC), ReTo Eco-Solutions (RETO), and TOMI Environmental Solutions (TOMZ). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "industrial machinery & supplies & components" industry.

How does WF compare to Tungray Technologies?

WF (NASDAQ:WFF) and Tungray Technologies (NASDAQ:TRSG) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability and dividends.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
WF	N/A	N/A	N/A
Tungray Technologies	N/A	N/A	N/A

Tungray Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than WF.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
WF	$7.40M	0.94	-$4.77M	N/A	N/A
Tungray Technologies	$15.62M	1.60	-$10K	N/A	N/A

WF has a beta of 1.96, indicating that its share price is 96% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tungray Technologies has a beta of 0.04, indicating that its share price is 96% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, WF and WF both had 2 articles in the media. Tungray Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat WF's score of 0.44 indicating that Tungray Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
WF	Neutral
Tungray Technologies	Positive

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
WF	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Tungray Technologies	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Summary

Tungray Technologies beats WF on 4 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does WF compare to LiqTech International?

WF (NASDAQ:WFF) and LiqTech International (NASDAQ:LIQT) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, profitability and media sentiment.

In the previous week, LiqTech International had 12 more articles in the media than WF. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for LiqTech International and 2 mentions for WF. LiqTech International's average media sentiment score of 0.58 beat WF's score of 0.44 indicating that LiqTech International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
WF	Neutral
LiqTech International	Positive

WF has a beta of 1.96, meaning that its share price is 96% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, LiqTech International has a beta of 1.06, meaning that its share price is 6% more volatile than the broader market.

LiqTech International has a consensus target price of $1.30, suggesting a potential upside of 82.10%. Given LiqTech International's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe LiqTech International is more favorable than WF.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
WF	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
LiqTech International	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

WF has a net margin of 0.00% compared to LiqTech International's net margin of -63.18%. WF's return on equity of 0.00% beat LiqTech International's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
WF	N/A	N/A	N/A
LiqTech International	-63.18%	-69.03%	-32.37%

WF has higher earnings, but lower revenue than LiqTech International.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
WF	$7.40M	0.94	-$4.77M	N/A	N/A
LiqTech International	$16.51M	1.42	-$8.60M	-$0.84	N/A

35.1% of LiqTech International shares are held by institutional investors. 12.8% of LiqTech International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

LiqTech International beats WF on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does WF compare to Greenland Technologies?

Greenland Technologies (NASDAQ:GTEC) and WF (NASDAQ:WFF) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, earnings and valuation.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Greenland Technologies	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
WF	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Greenland Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than WF.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Greenland Technologies	$102.71M	0.21	$4.93M	$0.58	1.81
WF	$7.40M	0.94	-$4.77M	N/A	N/A

Greenland Technologies has a beta of 0.23, meaning that its share price is 77% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, WF has a beta of 1.96, meaning that its share price is 96% more volatile than the broader market.

Greenland Technologies has a net margin of 12.32% compared to WF's net margin of 0.00%. Greenland Technologies' return on equity of 17.02% beat WF's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Greenland Technologies	12.32%	17.02%	9.68%
WF	N/A	N/A	N/A

10.9% of Greenland Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 36.9% of Greenland Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Greenland Technologies had 1 more articles in the media than WF. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Greenland Technologies and 2 mentions for WF. Greenland Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat WF's score of 0.44 indicating that Greenland Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Greenland Technologies	Positive
WF	Neutral

Summary

Greenland Technologies beats WF on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does WF compare to ReTo Eco-Solutions?

ReTo Eco-Solutions (NASDAQ:RETO) and WF (NASDAQ:WFF) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, media sentiment, valuation and risk.

6.3% of ReTo Eco-Solutions shares are held by institutional investors. 18.7% of ReTo Eco-Solutions shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

WF has higher revenue and earnings than ReTo Eco-Solutions.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
ReTo Eco-Solutions	$3.37M	4.13	-$12.34M	N/A	N/A
WF	$7.40M	0.94	-$4.77M	N/A	N/A

ReTo Eco-Solutions has a beta of 1.15, indicating that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, WF has a beta of 1.96, indicating that its stock price is 96% more volatile than the broader market.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
ReTo Eco-Solutions	N/A	N/A	N/A
WF	N/A	N/A	N/A

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
ReTo Eco-Solutions	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
WF	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

In the previous week, ReTo Eco-Solutions had 1 more articles in the media than WF. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for ReTo Eco-Solutions and 2 mentions for WF. ReTo Eco-Solutions' average media sentiment score of 1.28 beat WF's score of 0.44 indicating that ReTo Eco-Solutions is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
ReTo Eco-Solutions	Positive
WF	Neutral

Summary

ReTo Eco-Solutions beats WF on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does WF compare to TOMI Environmental Solutions?

TOMI Environmental Solutions (NASDAQ:TOMZ) and WF (NASDAQ:WFF) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, dividends and risk.

WF has a net margin of 0.00% compared to TOMI Environmental Solutions' net margin of -49.77%. WF's return on equity of 0.00% beat TOMI Environmental Solutions' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
TOMI Environmental Solutions	-49.77%	-326.81%	-44.61%
WF	N/A	N/A	N/A

4.8% of TOMI Environmental Solutions shares are owned by institutional investors. 20.2% of TOMI Environmental Solutions shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

TOMI Environmental Solutions has a beta of 1.98, meaning that its stock price is 98% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, WF has a beta of 1.96, meaning that its stock price is 96% more volatile than the broader market.

TOMI Environmental Solutions has higher earnings, but lower revenue than WF.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
TOMI Environmental Solutions	$6.93M	1.90	-$3.75M	-$0.50	N/A
WF	$7.40M	0.94	-$4.77M	N/A	N/A

In the previous week, WF had 1 more articles in the media than TOMI Environmental Solutions. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for WF and 1 mentions for TOMI Environmental Solutions. TOMI Environmental Solutions' average media sentiment score of 1.88 beat WF's score of 0.44 indicating that TOMI Environmental Solutions is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
TOMI Environmental Solutions	Very Positive
WF	Neutral

TOMI Environmental Solutions currently has a consensus price target of $7.00, indicating a potential upside of 332.10%. Given TOMI Environmental Solutions' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe TOMI Environmental Solutions is more favorable than WF.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
TOMI Environmental Solutions	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
WF	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Summary

TOMI Environmental Solutions beats WF on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get WF News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding WFF and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

WFF vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	WF	Machinery Industry	Industrials Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$6.40M	$11.20B	$10.19B	$12.71B
Dividend Yield	N/A	2.26%	97.17%	11.16%
P/E Ratio	N/A	21.33	25.75	25.27
Price / Sales	0.94	730.05	459.86	98.20
Price / Cash	N/A	22.73	23.71	51.44
Price / Book	2.16	4.30	4.84	6.20
Net Income	-$4.77M	$365.71M	$612.22M	$358.27M
7 Day Performance	-0.49%	-1.93%	-1.56%	-2.36%
1 Month Performance	24.54%	-2.95%	-3.85%	-2.77%
1 Year Performance	-60.77%	8.58%	6.34%	7.64%

WF Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
WFF WF	0.2086 of 5 stars	$2.03 +9.1%	N/A	-64.7%	$6.40M	$7.40M	N/A	134	Short Interest Increase
TRSG Tungray Technologies	0.3883 of 5 stars	$1.40 -3.8%	N/A	-5.9%	$22.81M	$15.62M	N/A	N/A	News Coverage Gap Down
LIQT LiqTech International	3.1354 of 5 stars	$0.69 +4.7%	$1.30 +87.8%	-70.1%	$22.81M	$16.51M	N/A	120	Trending News Short Interest Increase Analyst Revision Gap Down
GTEC Greenland Technologies	1.9875 of 5 stars	$1.07 +1.9%	N/A	-22.2%	$21.97M	$102.71M	1.84	330	Positive News Short Interest Decrease
RETO ReTo Eco-Solutions	1.3273 of 5 stars	$0.42 -21.3%	N/A	-99.8%	$15.12M	$3.37M	N/A	120	News Coverage Positive News Short Interest Decrease Gap Up High Trading Volume

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:WFF) was last updated on 9/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

WF (WFF) Competitors

WFF vs. TRSG, LIQT, GTEC, RETO, and TOMZ

How does WF compare to Tungray Technologies?

Summary

How does WF compare to LiqTech International?

Summary

How does WF compare to Greenland Technologies?

Summary

How does WF compare to ReTo Eco-Solutions?

Summary

How does WF compare to TOMI Environmental Solutions?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

WFF vs. The Competition

WF Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

WF (WFF) Competitors

WFF vs. TRSG, LIQT, GTEC, RETO, and TOMZ

How does WF compare to Tungray Technologies?

Is WFF or TRSG more profitable?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, WFF or TRSG?

Which has more risk & volatility, WFF or TRSG?

Does the media favor WFF or TRSG?

Do analysts recommend WFF or TRSG?

Summary

How does WF compare to LiqTech International?

Does the media prefer WFF or LIQT?

Which has more risk & volatility, WFF or LIQT?

Do analysts recommend WFF or LIQT?

Is WFF or LIQT more profitable?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, WFF or LIQT?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in WFF or LIQT?

Summary

How does WF compare to Greenland Technologies?

Do analysts prefer GTEC or WFF?

Which has better earnings & valuation, GTEC or WFF?

Which has more volatility and risk, GTEC or WFF?

Is GTEC or WFF more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in GTEC or WFF?

Does the media favor GTEC or WFF?

Summary

How does WF compare to ReTo Eco-Solutions?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in RETO or WFF?

Which has better valuation and earnings, RETO or WFF?

Which has more risk and volatility, RETO or WFF?

Is RETO or WFF more profitable?

Do analysts recommend RETO or WFF?

Does the media favor RETO or WFF?

Summary

How does WF compare to TOMI Environmental Solutions?

Is TOMZ or WFF more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in TOMZ or WFF?

Which has more volatility & risk, TOMZ or WFF?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, TOMZ or WFF?

Does the media refer more to TOMZ or WFF?

Do analysts rate TOMZ or WFF?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

WFF vs. The Competition

WF Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools