Do analysts rate AKA or DDL?

a.k.a. Brands currently has a consensus price target of $19.00, suggesting a potential upside of 69.64%. Given a.k.a. Brands' higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe a.k.a. Brands is more favorable than Dingdong (Cayman). Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score a.k.a. Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Dingdong (Cayman) 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Do analysts rate HVT.A or AKA?

a.k.a. Brands has a consensus price target of $19.00, suggesting a potential upside of 69.64%. Given a.k.a. Brands' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe a.k.a. Brands is more favorable than Haverty Furniture Companies. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Haverty Furniture Companies 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 a.k.a. Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Does the media prefer AKA or BNED?

In the previous week, Barnes & Noble Education had 9 more articles in the media than a.k.a. Brands. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Barnes & Noble Education and 2 mentions for a.k.a. Brands. Barnes & Noble Education's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat a.k.a. Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Barnes & Noble Education is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment a.k.a. Brands 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Barnes & Noble Education 4 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Is BBBY or AKA more profitable?

a.k.a. Brands has a net margin of -5.00% compared to Bed Bath & Beyond's net margin of -5.76%. a.k.a. Brands' return on equity of -23.32% beat Bed Bath & Beyond's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Bed Bath & Beyond -5.76% -27.60% -12.99% a.k.a. Brands -5.00% -23.32% -6.01%

Does the media refer more to BBBY or AKA?

In the previous week, Bed Bath & Beyond had 2 more articles in the media than a.k.a. Brands. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Bed Bath & Beyond and 2 mentions for a.k.a. Brands. Bed Bath & Beyond's average media sentiment score of 0.62 beat a.k.a. Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Bed Bath & Beyond is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Bed Bath & Beyond 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive a.k.a. Brands 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts recommend AKA or SGU?

a.k.a. Brands currently has a consensus price target of $19.00, suggesting a potential upside of 69.64%. Given a.k.a. Brands' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe a.k.a. Brands is more favorable than Star Group. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score a.k.a. Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Star Group 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Which has higher valuation & earnings, AKA or SGU?

Star Group has higher revenue and earnings than a.k.a. Brands. a.k.a. Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Star Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio a.k.a. Brands $600.21M 0.20 -$31.43M -$2.81 N/A Star Group $1.78B 0.24 $73.50M $2.23 5.73

Is AKA or SGU more profitable?

Star Group has a net margin of 5.31% compared to a.k.a. Brands' net margin of -5.00%. Star Group's return on equity of 28.64% beat a.k.a. Brands' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets a.k.a. Brands -5.00% -23.32% -6.01% Star Group 5.31% 28.64% 9.59%

Does the media refer more to AKA or SGU?

In the previous week, a.k.a. Brands had 1 more articles in the media than Star Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for a.k.a. Brands and 1 mentions for Star Group. Star Group's average media sentiment score of 1.01 beat a.k.a. Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Star Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment a.k.a. Brands 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Star Group 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

a.k.a. Brands (AKA) Competitors

$11.20 0.00 (0.00%)

As of 07/1/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Compare

AKA vs. DDL, HVT.A, BNED, BBBY, and SGU

Should you buy a.k.a. Brands stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares a.k.a. Brands with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with a.k.a. Brands include Dingdong (Cayman) (DDL), Haverty Furniture Companies (HVT.A), Barnes & Noble Education (BNED), Bed Bath & Beyond (BBBY), and Star Group (SGU). These companies are all part of the "retail" industry.

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Dingdong (Cayman)?

a.k.a. Brands (NYSE:AKA) and Dingdong (Cayman) (NYSE:DDL) are both small-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, media sentiment and profitability.

a.k.a. Brands currently has a consensus price target of $19.00, suggesting a potential upside of 69.64%. Given a.k.a. Brands' higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe a.k.a. Brands is more favorable than Dingdong (Cayman).

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
a.k.a. Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Dingdong (Cayman)	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

a.k.a. Brands has a beta of 1.41, meaning that its share price is 41% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Dingdong (Cayman) has a beta of 0.46, meaning that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market.

Dingdong (Cayman) has a net margin of 1.54% compared to a.k.a. Brands' net margin of -5.00%. Dingdong (Cayman)'s return on equity of 36.51% beat a.k.a. Brands' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
a.k.a. Brands	-5.00%	-23.32%	-6.01%
Dingdong (Cayman)	1.54%	36.51%	5.54%

55.4% of a.k.a. Brands shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.7% of Dingdong (Cayman) shares are held by institutional investors. 18.2% of a.k.a. Brands shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 29.8% of Dingdong (Cayman) shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, a.k.a. Brands had 2 more articles in the media than Dingdong (Cayman). MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for a.k.a. Brands and 0 mentions for Dingdong (Cayman). a.k.a. Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Dingdong (Cayman)'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
a.k.a. Brands	Neutral
Dingdong (Cayman)	Neutral

Dingdong (Cayman) has higher revenue and earnings than a.k.a. Brands. a.k.a. Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dingdong (Cayman), indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
a.k.a. Brands	$600.21M	0.20	-$31.43M	-$2.81	N/A
Dingdong (Cayman)	$3.42B	0.14	$31.70M	$0.24	8.19

Summary

Dingdong (Cayman) beats a.k.a. Brands on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Haverty Furniture Companies?

Haverty Furniture Companies (NYSE:HVT.A) and a.k.a. Brands (NYSE:AKA) are both small-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

a.k.a. Brands has a consensus price target of $19.00, suggesting a potential upside of 69.64%. Given a.k.a. Brands' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe a.k.a. Brands is more favorable than Haverty Furniture Companies.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Haverty Furniture Companies	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
a.k.a. Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Haverty Furniture Companies has a net margin of 0.00% compared to a.k.a. Brands' net margin of -5.00%. Haverty Furniture Companies' return on equity of 0.00% beat a.k.a. Brands' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Haverty Furniture Companies	N/A	N/A	N/A
a.k.a. Brands	-5.00%	-23.32%	-6.01%

Haverty Furniture Companies has a beta of 0.8, indicating that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, a.k.a. Brands has a beta of 1.41, indicating that its stock price is 41% more volatile than the broader market.

Haverty Furniture Companies has higher revenue and earnings than a.k.a. Brands. a.k.a. Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Haverty Furniture Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Haverty Furniture Companies	$758.99M	0.60	$19.31M	$1.20	23.41
a.k.a. Brands	$600.21M	0.20	-$31.43M	-$2.81	N/A

In the previous week, a.k.a. Brands had 2 more articles in the media than Haverty Furniture Companies. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for a.k.a. Brands and 0 mentions for Haverty Furniture Companies. Haverty Furniture Companies' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled a.k.a. Brands'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Haverty Furniture Companies	Neutral
a.k.a. Brands	Neutral

0.8% of Haverty Furniture Companies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.4% of a.k.a. Brands shares are held by institutional investors. 8.1% of Haverty Furniture Companies shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 18.2% of a.k.a. Brands shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Haverty Furniture Companies beats a.k.a. Brands on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Barnes & Noble Education?

a.k.a. Brands (NYSE:AKA) and Barnes & Noble Education (NYSE:BNED) are both small-cap retail companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability and dividends.

a.k.a. Brands has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Barnes & Noble Education. Barnes & Noble Education is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than a.k.a. Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
a.k.a. Brands	$600.21M	0.20	-$31.43M	-$2.81	N/A
Barnes & Noble Education	$1.73B	0.25	-$65.82M	-$0.32	N/A

In the previous week, Barnes & Noble Education had 9 more articles in the media than a.k.a. Brands. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Barnes & Noble Education and 2 mentions for a.k.a. Brands. Barnes & Noble Education's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat a.k.a. Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Barnes & Noble Education is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
a.k.a. Brands	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Barnes & Noble Education	4 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

a.k.a. Brands presently has a consensus price target of $19.00, suggesting a potential upside of 69.64%. Barnes & Noble Education has a consensus price target of $17.25, suggesting a potential upside of 36.36%. Given a.k.a. Brands' higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe a.k.a. Brands is more favorable than Barnes & Noble Education.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
a.k.a. Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Barnes & Noble Education	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

a.k.a. Brands has a beta of 1.41, meaning that its stock price is 41% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Barnes & Noble Education has a beta of 1.32, meaning that its stock price is 32% more volatile than the broader market.

55.4% of a.k.a. Brands shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.5% of Barnes & Noble Education shares are held by institutional investors. 18.2% of a.k.a. Brands shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Barnes & Noble Education shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Barnes & Noble Education has a net margin of -0.57% compared to a.k.a. Brands' net margin of -5.00%. Barnes & Noble Education's return on equity of -20.37% beat a.k.a. Brands' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
a.k.a. Brands	-5.00%	-23.32%	-6.01%
Barnes & Noble Education	-0.57%	-20.37%	-5.70%

Summary

Barnes & Noble Education beats a.k.a. Brands on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Bed Bath & Beyond?

Bed Bath & Beyond (NYSE:BBBY) and a.k.a. Brands (NYSE:AKA) are both small-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, earnings, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations and valuation.

76.3% of Bed Bath & Beyond shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.4% of a.k.a. Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.8% of Bed Bath & Beyond shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 18.2% of a.k.a. Brands shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

a.k.a. Brands has a net margin of -5.00% compared to Bed Bath & Beyond's net margin of -5.76%. a.k.a. Brands' return on equity of -23.32% beat Bed Bath & Beyond's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Bed Bath & Beyond	-5.76%	-27.60%	-12.99%
a.k.a. Brands	-5.00%	-23.32%	-6.01%

Bed Bath & Beyond presently has a consensus target price of $8.67, suggesting a potential upside of 44.28%. a.k.a. Brands has a consensus target price of $19.00, suggesting a potential upside of 69.64%. Given a.k.a. Brands' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe a.k.a. Brands is more favorable than Bed Bath & Beyond.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Bed Bath & Beyond	1 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
a.k.a. Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Bed Bath & Beyond has a beta of 2.85, suggesting that its stock price is 185% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, a.k.a. Brands has a beta of 1.41, suggesting that its stock price is 41% more volatile than the broader market.

a.k.a. Brands has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Bed Bath & Beyond. Bed Bath & Beyond is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than a.k.a. Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Bed Bath & Beyond	$1.06B	0.42	-$84.62M	-$0.95	N/A
a.k.a. Brands	$600.21M	0.20	-$31.43M	-$2.81	N/A

In the previous week, Bed Bath & Beyond had 2 more articles in the media than a.k.a. Brands. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Bed Bath & Beyond and 2 mentions for a.k.a. Brands. Bed Bath & Beyond's average media sentiment score of 0.62 beat a.k.a. Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Bed Bath & Beyond is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Bed Bath & Beyond	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
a.k.a. Brands	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Bed Bath & Beyond and a.k.a. Brands tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Star Group?

a.k.a. Brands (NYSE:AKA) and Star Group (NYSE:SGU) are both small-cap retail companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and dividends.

In the previous week, a.k.a. Brands had 1 more articles in the media than Star Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for a.k.a. Brands and 1 mentions for Star Group. Star Group's average media sentiment score of 1.01 beat a.k.a. Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Star Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
a.k.a. Brands	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Star Group	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

a.k.a. Brands has a beta of 1.41, suggesting that its stock price is 41% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Star Group has a beta of 0.33, suggesting that its stock price is 67% less volatile than the broader market.

55.4% of a.k.a. Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.4% of Star Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 18.2% of a.k.a. Brands shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 20.4% of Star Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Star Group has higher revenue and earnings than a.k.a. Brands. a.k.a. Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Star Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
a.k.a. Brands	$600.21M	0.20	-$31.43M	-$2.81	N/A
Star Group	$1.78B	0.24	$73.50M	$2.23	5.73

a.k.a. Brands currently has a consensus price target of $19.00, suggesting a potential upside of 69.64%. Given a.k.a. Brands' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe a.k.a. Brands is more favorable than Star Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
a.k.a. Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Star Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Star Group has a net margin of 5.31% compared to a.k.a. Brands' net margin of -5.00%. Star Group's return on equity of 28.64% beat a.k.a. Brands' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
a.k.a. Brands	-5.00%	-23.32%	-6.01%
Star Group	5.31%	28.64%	9.59%

Summary

Star Group beats a.k.a. Brands on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get a.k.a. Brands News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding AKA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

AKA vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	a.k.a. Brands	RETAIL Industry	Retail Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$121.18M	$10.18B	$26.76B	$23.52B
Dividend Yield	N/A	3.08%	175.36%	4.09%
P/E Ratio	-3.99	15.51	21.03	31.16
Price / Sales	0.20	1.07	3.61	21.11
Price / Cash	N/A	12.07	14.16	25.08
Price / Book	1.23	4.39	6.38	4.82
Net Income	-$31.43M	$378.06M	$960.18M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	14.87%	0.03%	1.26%	1.92%
1 Month Performance	17.77%	-1.42%	16.49%	2.90%
1 Year Performance	0.63%	15.98%	0.09%	20.55%

a.k.a. Brands Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
AKA a.k.a. Brands	2.4216 of 5 stars	$11.20 flat	$19.00 +69.6%	+4.8%	$121.18M	$600.21M	N/A	1,650	News Coverage Gap Down
DDL Dingdong (Cayman)	0.6755 of 5 stars	$1.94 +0.8%	N/A	-2.9%	$457.10M	$24.45B	8.06	3,658
HVT.A Haverty Furniture Companies	N/A	$28.09 flat	N/A	+28.6%	$451.97M	$758.99M	23.41	2,840
BNED Barnes & Noble Education	4.413 of 5 stars	$12.59 -7.1%	$17.25 +37.0%	+12.1%	$431.91M	$1.61B	N/A	3,559	Upcoming Earnings Analyst Revision
BBBY Bed Bath & Beyond	2.3158 of 5 stars	$5.79 -3.7%	$8.67 +49.8%	-12.5%	$427.89M	$1.04B	N/A	1,050

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:AKA) was last updated on 7/2/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

a.k.a. Brands (AKA) Competitors

AKA vs. DDL, HVT.A, BNED, BBBY, and SGU

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Dingdong (Cayman)?

Summary

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Haverty Furniture Companies?

Summary

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Barnes & Noble Education?

Summary

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Bed Bath & Beyond?

Summary

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Star Group?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

AKA vs. The Competition

a.k.a. Brands Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

a.k.a. Brands (AKA) Competitors

AKA vs. DDL, HVT.A, BNED, BBBY, and SGU

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Dingdong (Cayman)?

Do analysts rate AKA or DDL?

Which has more risk and volatility, AKA or DDL?

Is AKA or DDL more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in AKA or DDL?

Does the media refer more to AKA or DDL?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, AKA or DDL?

Summary

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Haverty Furniture Companies?

Do analysts rate HVT.A or AKA?

Is HVT.A or AKA more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, HVT.A or AKA?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, HVT.A or AKA?

Does the media favor HVT.A or AKA?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of HVT.A or AKA?

Summary

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Barnes & Noble Education?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, AKA or BNED?

Does the media prefer AKA or BNED?

Do analysts recommend AKA or BNED?

Which has more risk and volatility, AKA or BNED?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in AKA or BNED?

Is AKA or BNED more profitable?

Summary

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Bed Bath & Beyond?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of BBBY or AKA?

Is BBBY or AKA more profitable?

Do analysts recommend BBBY or AKA?

Which has more risk & volatility, BBBY or AKA?

Which has better earnings & valuation, BBBY or AKA?

Does the media refer more to BBBY or AKA?

Summary

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Star Group?

Does the media refer more to AKA or SGU?

Which has more volatility & risk, AKA or SGU?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of AKA or SGU?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, AKA or SGU?

Do analysts recommend AKA or SGU?

Is AKA or SGU more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

AKA vs. The Competition

a.k.a. Brands Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools