Bill.com Competitors

Bill.com (NYSE:BILL) and CrowdStrike (NASDAQ:CRWD) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, profitability, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

87.3% of Bill.com shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 60.0% of CrowdStrike shares are held by institutional investors. 11.1% of Bill.com shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 11.3% of CrowdStrike shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Bill.com and CrowdStrike, as provided by MarketBeat.

Bill.com presently has a consensus target price of $141.40, indicating a potential downside of 12.03%. CrowdStrike has a consensus target price of $231.72, indicating a potential upside of 7.68%. Given CrowdStrike's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe CrowdStrike is more favorable than Bill.com.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Bill.com and CrowdStrike's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Bill.com has higher earnings, but lower revenue than CrowdStrike. Bill.com is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CrowdStrike, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Bill.com and CrowdStrike's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

CrowdStrike beats Bill.com on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Bill.com (NYSE:BILL) and DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, valuation, dividends and earnings.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Bill.com and DocuSign's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Bill.com has higher earnings, but lower revenue than DocuSign. Bill.com is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than DocuSign, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

87.3% of Bill.com shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.8% of DocuSign shares are owned by institutional investors. 11.1% of Bill.com shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.1% of DocuSign shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Bill.com and DocuSign, as provided by MarketBeat.

Bill.com presently has a consensus target price of $141.40, suggesting a potential downside of 12.03%. DocuSign has a consensus target price of $273.55, suggesting a potential upside of 17.95%. Given DocuSign's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe DocuSign is more favorable than Bill.com.

Profitability

This table compares Bill.com and DocuSign's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Bill.com beats DocuSign on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Veeva Systems (NYSE:VEEV) and Bill.com (NYSE:BILL) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares Veeva Systems and Bill.com's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Veeva Systems and Bill.com, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Veeva Systems presently has a consensus price target of $299.8696, suggesting a potential upside of 9.81%. Bill.com has a consensus price target of $141.40, suggesting a potential downside of 12.03%. Given Veeva Systems' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Veeva Systems is more favorable than Bill.com.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

77.5% of Veeva Systems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.3% of Bill.com shares are held by institutional investors. 14.4% of Veeva Systems shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 11.1% of Bill.com shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Veeva Systems and Bill.com's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Veeva Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Bill.com. Bill.com is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Veeva Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Veeva Systems beats Bill.com on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Cadence Design Systems (NASDAQ:CDNS) and Bill.com (NYSE:BILL) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk and dividends.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Cadence Design Systems and Bill.com, as provided by MarketBeat.

Cadence Design Systems presently has a consensus target price of $140.9167, suggesting a potential downside of 4.31%. Bill.com has a consensus target price of $141.40, suggesting a potential downside of 12.03%. Given Cadence Design Systems' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Cadence Design Systems is more favorable than Bill.com.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

83.9% of Cadence Design Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.3% of Bill.com shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.6% of Cadence Design Systems shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 11.1% of Bill.com shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Cadence Design Systems and Bill.com's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Cadence Design Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Bill.com. Bill.com is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cadence Design Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Cadence Design Systems and Bill.com's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Cadence Design Systems beats Bill.com on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Palantir Technologies (NYSE:PLTR) and Bill.com (NYSE:BILL) are both large-cap business services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

10.1% of Palantir Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.3% of Bill.com shares are held by institutional investors. 11.1% of Bill.com shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Palantir Technologies and Bill.com's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Palantir Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Bill.com.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Palantir Technologies and Bill.com, as reported by MarketBeat.

Palantir Technologies presently has a consensus price target of $23.5714, indicating a potential upside of 4.90%. Bill.com has a consensus price target of $141.40, indicating a potential downside of 12.03%. Given Palantir Technologies' higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Palantir Technologies is more favorable than Bill.com.

Profitability

This table compares Palantir Technologies and Bill.com's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Bill.com beats Palantir Technologies on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Electronic Arts (NASDAQ:EA) and Bill.com (NYSE:BILL) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, earnings, dividends and profitability.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Electronic Arts and Bill.com's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Electronic Arts has higher revenue and earnings than Bill.com. Bill.com is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Electronic Arts, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

88.0% of Electronic Arts shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.3% of Bill.com shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Electronic Arts shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 11.1% of Bill.com shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for Electronic Arts and Bill.com, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Electronic Arts presently has a consensus price target of $153.3448, suggesting a potential upside of 8.72%. Bill.com has a consensus price target of $141.40, suggesting a potential downside of 12.03%. Given Electronic Arts' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Electronic Arts is more favorable than Bill.com.

Profitability

This table compares Electronic Arts and Bill.com's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Electronic Arts beats Bill.com on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.