NASDAQ:MDB

MongoDB Competitors

$315.85

-3.74 (-1.17 %)

(As of 04/16/2021 12:00 AM ET)

Add

Compare

Today's Range

$310.00

Now: $315.85▼

$319.85

50-Day Range

$258.50

MA: $309.83▼

$395.04

52-Week Range

$147.29

Now: $315.85▼

$428.96

Volume519,429 shs

Average Volume886,269 shs

Market Capitalization$19.33 billion

P/E RatioN/A

Dividend YieldN/A

Beta0.84

MongoDB (NASDAQ:MDB) Vs. ATVI, VMW, SNOW, ADSK, TWLO, and CRWD

Should you be buying MDB stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "prepackaged software" are considered alternatives and competitors to MongoDB, including Activision Blizzard (ATVI), VMware (VMW), Snowflake (SNOW), Autodesk (ADSK), Twilio (TWLO), and CrowdStrike (CRWD).

MongoDB vs. Activision Blizzard Stock

Activision Blizzard (NASDAQ:ATVI) and MongoDB (NASDAQ:MDB) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk and valuation.

Volatility and Risk

Activision Blizzard has a beta of 0.71, suggesting that its share price is 29% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, MongoDB has a beta of 0.84, suggesting that its share price is 16% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Activision Blizzard and MongoDB's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Activision Blizzard	$6.49 billion	11.52	$1.50 billion	$2.08	46.38
MongoDB	$421.72 million	45.83	$-175,520,000.00	($2.36)	-133.83

Activision Blizzard has higher revenue and earnings than MongoDB. MongoDB is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Activision Blizzard, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Activision Blizzard and MongoDB's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Activision Blizzard	28.90%	19.07%	12.65%
MongoDB	-46.73%	-343.82%	-13.80%

Institutional & Insider Ownership

85.8% of Activision Blizzard shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.4% of MongoDB shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Activision Blizzard shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 16.3% of MongoDB shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Activision Blizzard and MongoDB, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Activision Blizzard	0	3	25	0	2.89
MongoDB	0	5	11	0	2.69

Activision Blizzard currently has a consensus price target of $103.00, suggesting a potential upside of 6.76%. MongoDB has a consensus price target of $379.0625, suggesting a potential upside of 20.01%. Given MongoDB's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe MongoDB is more favorable than Activision Blizzard.

Summary

Activision Blizzard beats MongoDB on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

MongoDB vs. VMware Stock

VMware (NYSE:VMW) and MongoDB (NASDAQ:MDB) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, profitability, valuation and risk.

Profitability

This table compares VMware and MongoDB's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
VMware	13.75%	27.10%	7.58%
MongoDB	-46.73%	-343.82%	-13.80%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and price targets for VMware and MongoDB, as reported by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
VMware	0	11	11	0	2.50
MongoDB	0	5	11	0	2.69

VMware currently has a consensus price target of $173.00, indicating a potential upside of 5.42%. MongoDB has a consensus price target of $379.0625, indicating a potential upside of 20.01%. Given MongoDB's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe MongoDB is more favorable than VMware.

Risk & Volatility

VMware has a beta of 0.87, meaning that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, MongoDB has a beta of 0.84, meaning that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

16.9% of VMware shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.4% of MongoDB shares are held by institutional investors. 28.5% of VMware shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 16.3% of MongoDB shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares VMware and MongoDB's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
VMware	$10.81 billion	6.36	$6.41 billion	$4.51	36.39
MongoDB	$421.72 million	45.83	$-175,520,000.00	($2.36)	-133.83

VMware has higher revenue and earnings than MongoDB. MongoDB is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than VMware, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

VMware beats MongoDB on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

MongoDB vs. Snowflake Stock

Snowflake (NYSE:SNOW) and MongoDB (NASDAQ:MDB) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, valuation, risk and institutional ownership.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for Snowflake and MongoDB, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Snowflake	2	14	10	0	2.31
MongoDB	0	5	11	0	2.69

Snowflake presently has a consensus price target of $285.5385, suggesting a potential upside of 22.69%. MongoDB has a consensus price target of $379.0625, suggesting a potential upside of 20.01%. Given Snowflake's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Snowflake is more favorable than MongoDB.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

23.2% of Snowflake shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.4% of MongoDB shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Snowflake shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 16.3% of MongoDB shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Snowflake and MongoDB's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Snowflake	N/A	N/A	N/A
MongoDB	-46.73%	-343.82%	-13.80%

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Snowflake and MongoDB's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Snowflake	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
MongoDB	$421.72 million	45.83	$-175,520,000.00	($2.36)	-133.83

Snowflake has higher earnings, but lower revenue than MongoDB.

Summary

MongoDB beats Snowflake on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

MongoDB vs. Autodesk Stock

MongoDB (NASDAQ:MDB) and Autodesk (NASDAQ:ADSK) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, risk, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares MongoDB and Autodesk's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
MongoDB	$421.72 million	45.83	$-175,520,000.00	($2.36)	-133.83
Autodesk	$3.27 billion	20.13	$214.50 million	$1.50	200.11

Autodesk has higher revenue and earnings than MongoDB. MongoDB is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Autodesk, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares MongoDB and Autodesk's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
MongoDB	-46.73%	-343.82%	-13.80%
Autodesk	11.74%	-1,423.72%	8.61%

Insider & Institutional Ownership

87.4% of MongoDB shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.4% of Autodesk shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.3% of MongoDB shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Autodesk shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk & Volatility

MongoDB has a beta of 0.84, suggesting that its share price is 16% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Autodesk has a beta of 1.44, suggesting that its share price is 44% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and price targets for MongoDB and Autodesk, as provided by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
MongoDB	0	5	11	0	2.69
Autodesk	3	6	14	0	2.48

MongoDB presently has a consensus target price of $379.0625, suggesting a potential upside of 20.01%. Autodesk has a consensus target price of $289.6957, suggesting a potential downside of 3.49%. Given MongoDB's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe MongoDB is more favorable than Autodesk.

Summary

Autodesk beats MongoDB on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

MongoDB vs. Twilio Stock

MongoDB (NASDAQ:MDB) and Twilio (NYSE:TWLO) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for MongoDB and Twilio, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
MongoDB	0	5	11	0	2.69
Twilio	0	1	22	0	2.96

MongoDB currently has a consensus price target of $379.0625, suggesting a potential upside of 20.01%. Twilio has a consensus price target of $443.75, suggesting a potential upside of 15.19%. Given MongoDB's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe MongoDB is more favorable than Twilio.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares MongoDB and Twilio's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
MongoDB	$421.72 million	45.83	$-175,520,000.00	($2.36)	-133.83
Twilio	$1.13 billion	57.89	$-307,060,000.00	($1.83)	-210.51

MongoDB has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Twilio. Twilio is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MongoDB, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

MongoDB has a beta of 0.84, indicating that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Twilio has a beta of 1.51, indicating that its stock price is 51% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

87.4% of MongoDB shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.5% of Twilio shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.3% of MongoDB shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 6.7% of Twilio shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares MongoDB and Twilio's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
MongoDB	-46.73%	-343.82%	-13.80%
Twilio	-26.01%	-5.43%	-4.53%

Summary

Twilio beats MongoDB on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

MongoDB vs. CrowdStrike Stock

CrowdStrike (NASDAQ:CRWD) and MongoDB (NASDAQ:MDB) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and risk.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for CrowdStrike and MongoDB, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
CrowdStrike	0	4	20	0	2.83
MongoDB	0	5	11	0	2.69

CrowdStrike currently has a consensus target price of $231.72, suggesting a potential upside of 7.68%. MongoDB has a consensus target price of $379.0625, suggesting a potential upside of 20.01%. Given MongoDB's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe MongoDB is more favorable than CrowdStrike.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares CrowdStrike and MongoDB's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
CrowdStrike	$481.41 million	100.08	$-141,780,000.00	($0.97)	-221.86
MongoDB	$421.72 million	45.83	$-175,520,000.00	($2.36)	-133.83

CrowdStrike has higher revenue and earnings than MongoDB. CrowdStrike is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MongoDB, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares CrowdStrike and MongoDB's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
CrowdStrike	-13.40%	-12.79%	-6.31%
MongoDB	-46.73%	-343.82%	-13.80%

Insider and Institutional Ownership

60.0% of CrowdStrike shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.4% of MongoDB shares are held by institutional investors. 11.3% of CrowdStrike shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 16.3% of MongoDB shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility & Risk

CrowdStrike has a beta of 1.32, indicating that its stock price is 32% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, MongoDB has a beta of 0.84, indicating that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

CrowdStrike beats MongoDB on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.