Electronic Arts (EA) Competitors

71.1% of Microsoft shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.2% of Electronic Arts shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Microsoft shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Electronic Arts shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Microsoft pays an annual dividend of $3.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Electronic Arts pays an annual dividend of $0.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Microsoft pays out 21.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Electronic Arts pays out 21.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Microsoft has raised its dividend for 23 consecutive years. Microsoft is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Microsoft has a beta of 1.1, indicating that its stock price is 10% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Electronic Arts has a beta of 0.66, indicating that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the broader market.

Microsoft has a net margin of 39.34% compared to Electronic Arts' net margin of 11.78%. Microsoft's return on equity of 31.94% beat Electronic Arts' return on equity.

In the previous week, Microsoft had 221 more articles in the media than Electronic Arts. MarketBeat recorded 237 mentions for Microsoft and 16 mentions for Electronic Arts. Microsoft's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Electronic Arts' score of 0.31 indicating that Microsoft is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Microsoft has higher revenue and earnings than Electronic Arts. Microsoft is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Electronic Arts, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Microsoft presently has a consensus price target of $560.88, suggesting a potential upside of 34.82%. Electronic Arts has a consensus price target of $196.64, suggesting a potential downside of 2.23%. Given Microsoft's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Microsoft is more favorable than Electronic Arts.

Electronic Arts has a beta of 0.66, meaning that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Netflix has a beta of 1.55, meaning that its stock price is 55% more volatile than the broader market.

Netflix has a net margin of 28.52% compared to Electronic Arts' net margin of 11.78%. Netflix's return on equity of 40.92% beat Electronic Arts' return on equity.

In the previous week, Netflix had 108 more articles in the media than Electronic Arts. MarketBeat recorded 124 mentions for Netflix and 16 mentions for Electronic Arts. Netflix's average media sentiment score of 1.34 beat Electronic Arts' score of 0.31 indicating that Netflix is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

90.2% of Electronic Arts shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.9% of Netflix shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Electronic Arts shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Netflix shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Netflix has higher revenue and earnings than Electronic Arts. Netflix is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Electronic Arts, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Electronic Arts currently has a consensus target price of $196.64, suggesting a potential downside of 2.23%. Netflix has a consensus target price of $114.82, suggesting a potential upside of 30.96%. Given Netflix's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Netflix is more favorable than Electronic Arts.

In the previous week, Take-Two Interactive Software had 29 more articles in the media than Electronic Arts. MarketBeat recorded 45 mentions for Take-Two Interactive Software and 16 mentions for Electronic Arts. Take-Two Interactive Software's average media sentiment score of 0.61 beat Electronic Arts' score of 0.31 indicating that Take-Two Interactive Software is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Electronic Arts has a net margin of 11.78% compared to Take-Two Interactive Software's net margin of -4.48%. Electronic Arts' return on equity of 23.41% beat Take-Two Interactive Software's return on equity.

Take-Two Interactive Software has a beta of 0.97, suggesting that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Electronic Arts has a beta of 0.66, suggesting that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the broader market.

Take-Two Interactive Software presently has a consensus target price of $287.53, suggesting a potential upside of 30.30%. Electronic Arts has a consensus target price of $196.64, suggesting a potential downside of 2.23%. Given Take-Two Interactive Software's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Take-Two Interactive Software is more favorable than Electronic Arts.

95.5% of Take-Two Interactive Software shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.2% of Electronic Arts shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of Take-Two Interactive Software shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Electronic Arts shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Electronic Arts has higher revenue and earnings than Take-Two Interactive Software. Take-Two Interactive Software is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Electronic Arts, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

90.2% of Electronic Arts shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.5% of Roblox shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Electronic Arts shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 10.1% of Roblox shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Electronic Arts currently has a consensus target price of $196.64, suggesting a potential downside of 2.23%. Roblox has a consensus target price of $87.07, suggesting a potential upside of 89.87%. Given Roblox's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Roblox is more favorable than Electronic Arts.

In the previous week, Roblox had 20 more articles in the media than Electronic Arts. MarketBeat recorded 36 mentions for Roblox and 16 mentions for Electronic Arts. Roblox's average media sentiment score of 0.50 beat Electronic Arts' score of 0.31 indicating that Roblox is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Electronic Arts has a net margin of 11.78% compared to Roblox's net margin of -20.69%. Electronic Arts' return on equity of 23.41% beat Roblox's return on equity.

Electronic Arts has higher revenue and earnings than Roblox. Roblox is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Electronic Arts, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Electronic Arts has a beta of 0.66, meaning that its share price is 34% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Roblox has a beta of 1.5, meaning that its share price is 50% more volatile than the broader market.