Baidu Competitors

Zoom Video Communications (NASDAQ:ZM) and Baidu (NASDAQ:BIDU) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings and institutional ownership.

Risk & Volatility

Zoom Video Communications has a beta of -1.46, indicating that its stock price is 246% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Baidu has a beta of 1.33, indicating that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Zoom Video Communications and Baidu, as provided by MarketBeat.

Zoom Video Communications currently has a consensus target price of $415.68, indicating a potential downside of 19.00%. Baidu has a consensus target price of $148.5833, indicating a potential upside of 10.19%. Given Baidu's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Baidu is more favorable than Zoom Video Communications.

Profitability

This table compares Zoom Video Communications and Baidu's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

38.0% of Zoom Video Communications shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 52.2% of Baidu shares are owned by institutional investors. 24.3% of Zoom Video Communications shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 16.7% of Baidu shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Zoom Video Communications and Baidu's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Baidu has higher revenue and earnings than Zoom Video Communications. Baidu is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Zoom Video Communications, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Snap (NYSE:SNAP) and Baidu (NASDAQ:BIDU) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings and institutional ownership.

Risk & Volatility

Snap has a beta of 1.52, indicating that its stock price is 52% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Baidu has a beta of 1.33, indicating that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Snap and Baidu, as provided by MarketBeat.

Snap currently has a consensus target price of $31.6591, indicating a potential downside of 13.26%. Baidu has a consensus target price of $148.5833, indicating a potential upside of 10.19%. Given Baidu's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Baidu is more favorable than Snap.

Profitability

This table compares Snap and Baidu's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

47.0% of Snap shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 52.2% of Baidu shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.7% of Baidu shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Snap and Baidu's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Baidu has higher revenue and earnings than Snap. Snap is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Baidu, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Baidu beats Snap on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Twitter (NYSE:TWTR) and Baidu (NASDAQ:BIDU) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings and institutional ownership.

Risk & Volatility

Twitter has a beta of 0.81, indicating that its stock price is 19% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Baidu has a beta of 1.33, indicating that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Twitter and Baidu, as provided by MarketBeat.

Twitter currently has a consensus target price of $35.9929, indicating a potential downside of 28.36%. Baidu has a consensus target price of $148.5833, indicating a potential upside of 10.19%. Given Baidu's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Baidu is more favorable than Twitter.

Profitability

This table compares Twitter and Baidu's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

71.9% of Twitter shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 52.2% of Baidu shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.6% of Twitter shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 16.7% of Baidu shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Twitter and Baidu's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Twitter has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Baidu. Baidu is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Twitter, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Baidu beats Twitter on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

IHS Markit (NYSE:INFO) and Baidu (NASDAQ:BIDU) are both large-cap business services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings and institutional ownership.

Risk & Volatility

IHS Markit has a beta of 0.98, indicating that its stock price is 2% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Baidu has a beta of 1.33, indicating that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

88.4% of IHS Markit shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 52.2% of Baidu shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of IHS Markit shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 16.7% of Baidu shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares IHS Markit and Baidu's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

IHS Markit has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Baidu. Baidu is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than IHS Markit, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for IHS Markit and Baidu, as provided by MarketBeat.

IHS Markit currently has a consensus target price of $80.8235, indicating a potential downside of 1.27%. Baidu has a consensus target price of $148.5833, indicating a potential upside of 10.19%. Given Baidu's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Baidu is more favorable than IHS Markit.

Profitability

This table compares IHS Markit and Baidu's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Pinterest (NYSE:PINS) and Baidu (NASDAQ:BIDU) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, valuation, earnings, risk and institutional ownership.

Volatility & Risk

Pinterest has a beta of 1.72, meaning that its share price is 72% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Baidu has a beta of 1.33, meaning that its share price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

54.5% of Pinterest shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 52.2% of Baidu shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.7% of Baidu shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Pinterest and Baidu's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Baidu has higher revenue and earnings than Pinterest. Pinterest is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Baidu, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for Pinterest and Baidu, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Pinterest currently has a consensus target price of $37.7222, indicating a potential downside of 23.61%. Baidu has a consensus target price of $148.5833, indicating a potential upside of 10.19%. Given Baidu's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Baidu is more favorable than Pinterest.

Profitability

This table compares Pinterest and Baidu's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Baidu beats Pinterest on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Trade Desk (NASDAQ:TTD) and Baidu (NASDAQ:BIDU) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, valuation, earnings, risk and institutional ownership.

Volatility & Risk

Trade Desk has a beta of 2.44, meaning that its share price is 144% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Baidu has a beta of 1.33, meaning that its share price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

71.7% of Trade Desk shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 52.2% of Baidu shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.1% of Trade Desk shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 16.7% of Baidu shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Trade Desk and Baidu's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for Trade Desk and Baidu, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Trade Desk currently has a consensus target price of $455.2143, indicating a potential downside of 27.13%. Baidu has a consensus target price of $148.5833, indicating a potential upside of 10.19%. Given Baidu's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Baidu is more favorable than Trade Desk.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Trade Desk and Baidu's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Baidu has higher revenue and earnings than Trade Desk. Baidu is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trade Desk, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.