Bank of Hawaii Competitors

Truist Financial (NYSE:TFC) and Bank of Hawaii (NYSE:BOH) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends and profitability.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Truist Financial and Bank of Hawaii, as reported by MarketBeat.

Truist Financial presently has a consensus target price of $49.0750, indicating a potential downside of 16.68%. Bank of Hawaii has a consensus target price of $61.00, indicating a potential downside of 31.11%. Given Truist Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Truist Financial is more favorable than Bank of Hawaii.

Profitability

This table compares Truist Financial and Bank of Hawaii's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk and Volatility

Truist Financial has a beta of 1.36, meaning that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Bank of Hawaii has a beta of 1.27, meaning that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Truist Financial pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Bank of Hawaii pays an annual dividend of $2.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Truist Financial pays out 41.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Bank of Hawaii pays out 48.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Truist Financial has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Bank of Hawaii has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Truist Financial is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

72.1% of Truist Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.8% of Bank of Hawaii shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Truist Financial shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Bank of Hawaii shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Truist Financial and Bank of Hawaii's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Truist Financial has higher revenue and earnings than Bank of Hawaii. Truist Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bank of Hawaii, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Truist Financial beats Bank of Hawaii on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

The PNC Financial Services Group (NYSE:PNC) and Bank of Hawaii (NYSE:BOH) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk and dividends.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations for The PNC Financial Services Group and Bank of Hawaii, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

The PNC Financial Services Group currently has a consensus price target of $147.7059, indicating a potential downside of 14.96%. Bank of Hawaii has a consensus price target of $61.00, indicating a potential downside of 31.11%. Given The PNC Financial Services Group's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe The PNC Financial Services Group is more favorable than Bank of Hawaii.

Profitability

This table compares The PNC Financial Services Group and Bank of Hawaii's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

80.6% of The PNC Financial Services Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.8% of Bank of Hawaii shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of The PNC Financial Services Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Bank of Hawaii shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares The PNC Financial Services Group and Bank of Hawaii's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

The PNC Financial Services Group has higher revenue and earnings than Bank of Hawaii. The PNC Financial Services Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bank of Hawaii, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

The PNC Financial Services Group has a beta of 1.38, meaning that its share price is 38% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Bank of Hawaii has a beta of 1.27, meaning that its share price is 27% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

The PNC Financial Services Group pays an annual dividend of $4.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Bank of Hawaii pays an annual dividend of $2.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. The PNC Financial Services Group pays out 40.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Bank of Hawaii pays out 48.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. The PNC Financial Services Group has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Bank of Hawaii has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Summary

The PNC Financial Services Group beats Bank of Hawaii on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Bank of Hawaii (NYSE:BOH) and First Republic Bank (NYSE:FRC) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, profitability and valuation.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Bank of Hawaii and First Republic Bank, as reported by MarketBeat.

Bank of Hawaii presently has a consensus target price of $61.00, indicating a potential downside of 31.11%. First Republic Bank has a consensus target price of $134.3333, indicating a potential downside of 19.45%. Given First Republic Bank's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe First Republic Bank is more favorable than Bank of Hawaii.

Profitability

This table compares Bank of Hawaii and First Republic Bank's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

72.8% of Bank of Hawaii shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.5% of First Republic Bank shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of Bank of Hawaii shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Bank of Hawaii and First Republic Bank's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

First Republic Bank has higher revenue and earnings than Bank of Hawaii. Bank of Hawaii is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than First Republic Bank, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

Bank of Hawaii has a beta of 1.27, meaning that its share price is 27% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, First Republic Bank has a beta of 1.06, meaning that its share price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Bank of Hawaii pays an annual dividend of $2.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. First Republic Bank pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Bank of Hawaii pays out 48.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. First Republic Bank pays out 13.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Bank of Hawaii has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and First Republic Bank has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years.

Summary

First Republic Bank beats Bank of Hawaii on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Bank of Hawaii (NYSE:BOH) and SVB Financial Group (NASDAQ:SIVB) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, profitability and valuation.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Bank of Hawaii and SVB Financial Group, as reported by MarketBeat.

Bank of Hawaii presently has a consensus target price of $61.00, indicating a potential downside of 31.11%. SVB Financial Group has a consensus target price of $422.9333, indicating a potential downside of 20.15%. Given SVB Financial Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe SVB Financial Group is more favorable than Bank of Hawaii.

Profitability

This table compares Bank of Hawaii and SVB Financial Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

72.8% of Bank of Hawaii shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.4% of SVB Financial Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of Bank of Hawaii shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of SVB Financial Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Bank of Hawaii and SVB Financial Group's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

SVB Financial Group has higher revenue and earnings than Bank of Hawaii. Bank of Hawaii is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SVB Financial Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility & Risk

Bank of Hawaii has a beta of 1.27, indicating that its share price is 27% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, SVB Financial Group has a beta of 2.14, indicating that its share price is 114% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

SVB Financial Group beats Bank of Hawaii on 13 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Bank of Hawaii (NYSE:BOH) and Fifth Third Bancorp (NASDAQ:FITB) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, profitability and valuation.

Dividends

Bank of Hawaii pays an annual dividend of $2.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Fifth Third Bancorp pays an annual dividend of $1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Bank of Hawaii pays out 48.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fifth Third Bancorp pays out 39.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Bank of Hawaii has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Fifth Third Bancorp has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

Profitability

This table compares Bank of Hawaii and Fifth Third Bancorp's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Bank of Hawaii and Fifth Third Bancorp's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Fifth Third Bancorp has higher revenue and earnings than Bank of Hawaii. Fifth Third Bancorp is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bank of Hawaii, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Bank of Hawaii and Fifth Third Bancorp, as reported by MarketBeat.

Bank of Hawaii presently has a consensus target price of $61.00, indicating a potential downside of 31.11%. Fifth Third Bancorp has a consensus target price of $29.3194, indicating a potential downside of 19.16%. Given Fifth Third Bancorp's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Fifth Third Bancorp is more favorable than Bank of Hawaii.

Volatility and Risk

Bank of Hawaii has a beta of 1.27, meaning that its share price is 27% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Fifth Third Bancorp has a beta of 1.63, meaning that its share price is 63% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

72.8% of Bank of Hawaii shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.2% of Fifth Third Bancorp shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of Bank of Hawaii shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Fifth Third Bancorp shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Fifth Third Bancorp beats Bank of Hawaii on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Regions Financial (NYSE:RF) and Bank of Hawaii (NYSE:BOH) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

Dividends

Regions Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Bank of Hawaii pays an annual dividend of $2.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Regions Financial pays out 40.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Bank of Hawaii pays out 48.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Regions Financial has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Bank of Hawaii has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Profitability

This table compares Regions Financial and Bank of Hawaii's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Regions Financial and Bank of Hawaii's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Regions Financial has higher revenue and earnings than Bank of Hawaii. Regions Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bank of Hawaii, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Regions Financial and Bank of Hawaii, as reported by MarketBeat.

Regions Financial presently has a consensus price target of $16.2045, indicating a potential downside of 24.21%. Bank of Hawaii has a consensus price target of $61.00, indicating a potential downside of 31.11%. Given Regions Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Regions Financial is more favorable than Bank of Hawaii.

Risk & Volatility

Regions Financial has a beta of 1.58, indicating that its share price is 58% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Bank of Hawaii has a beta of 1.27, indicating that its share price is 27% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

71.7% of Regions Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.8% of Bank of Hawaii shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Regions Financial shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Bank of Hawaii shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Regions Financial beats Bank of Hawaii on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.