S&P 500   3,768.47
DOW   30,924.14
QQQ   304.10
S&P 500   3,768.47
DOW   30,924.14
QQQ   304.10
S&P 500   3,768.47
DOW   30,924.14
QQQ   304.10
S&P 500   3,768.47
DOW   30,924.14
QQQ   304.10
Log in
NYSE:BRFS

BRF Competitors

$4.04
+0.15 (+3.86 %)
(As of 03/4/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$3.97
Now: $4.04
$4.18
50-Day Range
$3.73
MA: $4.08
$4.42
52-Week Range
$2.27
Now: $4.04
$5.71
Volume5.44 million shs
Average Volume3.84 million shs
Market Capitalization$3.28 billion
P/E Ratio13.03
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta1.85

Competitors

BRF (NYSE:BRFS) Vs. SJM, SAM, LW, NTCO, DAR, and ARMK

Should you be buying BRFS stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sector of "consumer staples" are considered alternatives and competitors to BRF, including The J. M. Smucker (SJM), The Boston Beer (SAM), Lamb Weston (LW), Natura &Co (NTCO), Darling Ingredients (DAR), and Aramark (ARMK).

The J. M. Smucker (NYSE:SJM) and BRF (NYSE:BRFS) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation and earnings.

Risk and Volatility

The J. M. Smucker has a beta of 0.26, meaning that its share price is 74% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, BRF has a beta of 1.85, meaning that its share price is 85% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares The J. M. Smucker and BRF's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The J. M. Smucker$7.80 billion1.63$779.50 million$8.7613.27
BRF$8.13 billion0.40$41.22 million$0.3611.22

The J. M. Smucker has higher earnings, but lower revenue than BRF. BRF is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The J. M. Smucker, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for The J. M. Smucker and BRF, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
The J. M. Smucker29001.82
BRF03102.25

The J. M. Smucker currently has a consensus price target of $116.00, indicating a potential downside of 0.19%. BRF has a consensus price target of $4.50, indicating a potential upside of 11.39%. Given BRF's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe BRF is more favorable than The J. M. Smucker.

Profitability

This table compares The J. M. Smucker and BRF's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
The J. M. Smucker10.92%13.31%6.55%
BRF3.22%16.28%2.55%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

81.5% of The J. M. Smucker shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.0% of BRF shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.6% of The J. M. Smucker shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of BRF shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

The J. M. Smucker beats BRF on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

The Boston Beer (NYSE:SAM) and BRF (NYSE:BRFS) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation and earnings.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

68.8% of The Boston Beer shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.0% of BRF shares are owned by institutional investors. 29.1% of The Boston Beer shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of BRF shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk and Volatility

The Boston Beer has a beta of 0.76, meaning that its share price is 24% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, BRF has a beta of 1.85, meaning that its share price is 85% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for The Boston Beer and BRF, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
The Boston Beer14702.50
BRF03102.25

The Boston Beer currently has a consensus price target of $1,048.50, indicating a potential upside of 1.72%. BRF has a consensus price target of $4.50, indicating a potential upside of 11.39%. Given BRF's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe BRF is more favorable than The Boston Beer.

Profitability

This table compares The Boston Beer and BRF's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
The Boston Beer10.77%20.36%13.84%
BRF3.22%16.28%2.55%

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares The Boston Beer and BRF's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The Boston Beer$1.25 billion10.12$110.04 million$9.17112.41
BRF$8.13 billion0.40$41.22 million$0.3611.22

The Boston Beer has higher earnings, but lower revenue than BRF. BRF is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The Boston Beer, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

The Boston Beer beats BRF on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

BRF (NYSE:BRFS) and Lamb Weston (NYSE:LW) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, risk, valuation and profitability.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

8.0% of BRF shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.4% of Lamb Weston shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of BRF shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Lamb Weston shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility & Risk

BRF has a beta of 1.85, indicating that its share price is 85% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Lamb Weston has a beta of 0.78, indicating that its share price is 22% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for BRF and Lamb Weston, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
BRF03102.25
Lamb Weston03202.40

BRF presently has a consensus target price of $4.50, indicating a potential upside of 11.39%. Lamb Weston has a consensus target price of $65.20, indicating a potential downside of 21.22%. Given BRF's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe BRF is more favorable than Lamb Weston.

Profitability

This table compares BRF and Lamb Weston's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
BRF3.22%16.28%2.55%
Lamb Weston8.33%95.26%7.20%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares BRF and Lamb Weston's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BRF$8.13 billion0.40$41.22 million$0.3611.22
Lamb Weston$3.79 billion3.19$365.90 million$2.5033.10

Lamb Weston has lower revenue, but higher earnings than BRF. BRF is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lamb Weston, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Lamb Weston beats BRF on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

BRF (NYSE:BRFS) and Natura &Co (NYSE:NTCO) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, risk, valuation and profitability.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

8.0% of BRF shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.8% of Natura &Co shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of BRF shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for BRF and Natura &Co, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
BRF03102.25
Natura &Co10001.00

BRF presently has a consensus target price of $4.50, indicating a potential upside of 11.39%. Given BRF's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe BRF is more favorable than Natura &Co.

Profitability

This table compares BRF and Natura &Co's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
BRF3.22%16.28%2.55%
Natura &CoN/AN/AN/A

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares BRF and Natura &Co's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BRF$8.13 billion0.40$41.22 million$0.3611.22
Natura &Co$3.66 billion3.11$39.40 million$0.09184.00

BRF has higher revenue and earnings than Natura &Co. BRF is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Natura &Co, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

BRF beats Natura &Co on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

BRF (NYSE:BRFS) and Darling Ingredients (NYSE:DAR) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, risk, valuation and profitability.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

8.0% of BRF shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.7% of Darling Ingredients shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of BRF shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of Darling Ingredients shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility & Risk

BRF has a beta of 1.85, indicating that its share price is 85% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Darling Ingredients has a beta of 1.33, indicating that its share price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for BRF and Darling Ingredients, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
BRF03102.25
Darling Ingredients021002.83

BRF presently has a consensus target price of $4.50, indicating a potential upside of 11.39%. Darling Ingredients has a consensus target price of $64.6364, indicating a potential downside of 4.85%. Given BRF's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe BRF is more favorable than Darling Ingredients.

Profitability

This table compares BRF and Darling Ingredients' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
BRF3.22%16.28%2.55%
Darling Ingredients14.50%15.13%7.62%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares BRF and Darling Ingredients' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BRF$8.13 billion0.40$41.22 million$0.3611.22
Darling Ingredients$3.36 billion3.28$312.60 million$1.3450.69

Darling Ingredients has lower revenue, but higher earnings than BRF. BRF is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Darling Ingredients, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Darling Ingredients beats BRF on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

BRF (NYSE:BRFS) and Aramark (NYSE:ARMK) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, risk, valuation and profitability.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

8.0% of BRF shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.5% of Aramark shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of BRF shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.3% of Aramark shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility & Risk

BRF has a beta of 1.85, indicating that its share price is 85% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Aramark has a beta of 1.88, indicating that its share price is 88% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for BRF and Aramark, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
BRF03102.25
Aramark09402.31

BRF presently has a consensus target price of $4.50, indicating a potential upside of 11.39%. Aramark has a consensus target price of $31.4167, indicating a potential downside of 22.68%. Given BRF's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe BRF is more favorable than Aramark.

Profitability

This table compares BRF and Aramark's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
BRF3.22%16.28%2.55%
Aramark-3.60%-1.48%-0.30%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares BRF and Aramark's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BRF$8.13 billion0.40$41.22 million$0.3611.22
Aramark$12.83 billion0.80$-461,530,000.00($0.17)-239.00

BRF has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Aramark. Aramark is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than BRF, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.


BRF Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
The J. M. Smucker logo
SJM
The J. M. Smucker
2.1$116.22+1.9%$12.74 billion$7.80 billion15.05Unusual Options Activity
The Boston Beer logo
SAM
The Boston Beer
1.5$1,030.81+0.8%$12.64 billion$1.25 billion73.63
Lamb Weston logo
LW
Lamb Weston
1.9$82.76+0.4%$12.11 billion$3.79 billion40.97
NTCO
Natura &Co
0.1$16.56+0.9%$11.39 billion$3.66 billion184.00Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Gap Down
Darling Ingredients logo
DAR
Darling Ingredients
1.8$67.93+2.6%$11.02 billion$3.36 billion23.03Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Aramark logo
ARMK
Aramark
1.4$40.63+0.0%$10.32 billion$12.83 billion-22.20
Newell Brands logo
NWL
Newell Brands
1.4$23.96+1.7%$10.17 billion$9.71 billion-92.15Decrease in Short Interest
Molson Coors Beverage logo
TAP
Molson Coors Beverage
1.3$45.39+1.0%$9.84 billion$13.01 billion16.87Increase in Short Interest
Coca-Cola FEMSA logo
KOF
Coca-Cola FEMSA
1.8$45.43+2.3%$9.54 billion$10.11 billion21.95Analyst Upgrade
High Trading Volume
Decrease in Short Interest
Beyond Meat logo
BYND
Beyond Meat
1.1$136.42+2.3%$8.59 billion$297.90 million-303.16Analyst Upgrade
The New York Times logo
NYT
The New York Times
1.8$50.46+3.3%$8.44 billion$1.81 billion53.12
Albertsons Companies logo
ACI
Albertsons Companies
2.1$17.93+1.2%$8.35 billion$62.46 billion0.00Analyst Downgrade
US Foods logo
USFD
US Foods
1.5$37.37+2.7%$8.26 billion$25.94 billion-59.32
Service Co. International logo
SCI
Service Co. International
1.9$46.19+1.8%$7.83 billion$3.23 billion18.11
Post logo
POST
Post
1.5$100.88+2.2%$6.49 billion$5.70 billion-3,361.55Insider Selling
Freshpet logo
FRPT
Freshpet
1.7$140.07+5.2%$6.04 billion$245.86 million1,273.48Analyst Report
Coty logo
COTY
Coty
1.3$7.82+4.2%$6.00 billion$4.72 billion-6.74Increase in Short Interest
Ingredion logo
INGR
Ingredion
2.1$89.11+1.7%$5.98 billion$6.21 billion17.61
Pilgrim's Pride logo
PPC
Pilgrim's Pride
1.7$23.75+0.9%$5.78 billion$11.41 billion31.25Analyst Upgrade
Helen of Troy logo
HELE
Helen of Troy
1.5$220.52+1.2%$5.38 billion$1.71 billion24.48Analyst Downgrade
Ollie's Bargain Outlet logo
OLLI
Ollie's Bargain Outlet
1.2$82.16+4.3%$5.37 billion$1.41 billion23.75News Coverage
Lancaster Colony logo
LANC
Lancaster Colony
2.0$175.24+0.6%$4.83 billion$1.33 billion36.21
Flowers Foods logo
FLO
Flowers Foods
1.3$22.40+0.9%$4.74 billion$4.12 billion48.70
National Beverage logo
FIZZ
National Beverage
1.3$48.88+1.0%$4.56 billion$1.00 billion14.21Decrease in Short Interest
51job logo
JOBS
51job
1.7$65.67+2.0%$4.43 billion$574.57 million30.98
WD-40 logo
WDFC
WD-40
1.6$311.95+0.4%$4.27 billion$423.35 million70.90
Nomad Foods logo
NOMD
Nomad Foods
1.8$24.70+2.3%$4.25 billion$2.60 billion20.58
The Hain Celestial Group logo
HAIN
The Hain Celestial Group
1.5$41.94+0.1%$4.19 billion$2.05 billion161.31
Leslie's logo
LESL
Leslie's
1.7$20.93+6.4%$3.91 billion$1.11 billion49.83
Celsius logo
CELH
Celsius
1.5$53.04+8.9%$3.85 billion$75.15 million757.82Upcoming Earnings
Sanderson Farms logo
SAFM
Sanderson Farms
1.9$159.87+0.8%$3.57 billion$3.56 billion126.88Analyst Report
Insider Selling
Hillenbrand logo
HI
Hillenbrand
2.2$47.40+2.1%$3.56 billion$2.52 billion-58.52Analyst Revision
Grocery Outlet logo
GO
Grocery Outlet
1.4$35.45+0.5%$3.34 billion$2.56 billion37.32Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
Unusual Options Activity
Analyst Revision
Compañía Cervecerías Unidas logo
CCU
Compañía Cervecerías Unidas
1.4$17.74+2.3%$3.28 billion$2.41 billion26.09
J & J Snack Foods logo
JJSF
J & J Snack Foods
1.6$155.23+2.2%$2.95 billion$1.02 billion163.40News Coverage
Energizer logo
ENR
Energizer
2.8$42.84+1.1%$2.93 billion$2.74 billion-27.11Insider Buying
TreeHouse Foods logo
THS
TreeHouse Foods
1.2$51.62+2.8%$2.89 billion$4.29 billion-516.20
JW.B
John Wiley & Sons
0.6$51.06+4.7%$2.86 billion$1.83 billion-74.00Gap Up
Medifast logo
MED
Medifast
2.3$239.76+6.1%$2.82 billion$713.67 million30.01Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
Utz Brands logo
UTZ
Utz Brands
1.6$23.23+4.7%$2.80 billionN/A0.00
The Simply Good Foods logo
SMPL
The Simply Good Foods
1.8$28.94+0.1%$2.77 billion$816.64 million45.94
Nu Skin Enterprises logo
NUS
Nu Skin Enterprises
2.3$49.68+1.9%$2.53 billion$2.42 billion16.73
Coca-Cola Consolidated logo
COKE
Coca-Cola Consolidated
0.9$257.54+1.0%$2.41 billion$4.83 billion25.32
Inter Parfums logo
IPAR
Inter Parfums
1.4$69.99+3.9%$2.21 billion$713.51 million69.99Earnings Announcement
Dividend Cut
Analyst Report
Decrease in Short Interest
Analyst Revision
Tootsie Roll Industries logo
TR
Tootsie Roll Industries
0.9$32.11+1.3%$2.13 billion$523.62 million36.76Decrease in Short Interest
Vector Group logo
VGR
Vector Group
1.6$13.41+3.8%$2.06 billion$1.90 billion30.48Dividend Announcement
Analyst Upgrade
News Coverage
Industrias Bachoco logo
IBA
Industrias Bachoco
1.4$39.30+2.6%$1.97 billion$3.26 billion14.56Decrease in Short Interest
Hostess Brands logo
TWNK
Hostess Brands
1.4$14.59+0.5%$1.91 billion$907.67 million29.18
B&G Foods logo
BGS
B&G Foods
1.7$28.20+0.0%$1.81 billion$1.66 billion13.96Earnings Announcement
Dividend Announcement
Analyst Report
Decrease in Short Interest
Analyst Revision
United Natural Foods logo
UNFI
United Natural Foods
1.4$29.90+5.0%$1.68 billion$26.51 billion15.74Upcoming Earnings
High Trading Volume
News Coverage
Gap Down
This page was last updated on 3/5/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.