Go Pro

Peabody Energy (BTU) Competitors

Peabody Energy logo
$24.80 +0.06 (+0.26%)
Closing price 10/2/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$24.98 +0.17 (+0.69%)
As of 10/2/2026 07:30 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

BTU vs. AMR, HCC, NXE, CNR, and ARLP

Should you buy Peabody Energy stock or one of its competitors? Peabody Energy's main competitors and comparable companies include Alpha Metallurgical Resources (AMR), Warrior Met Coal (HCC), NexGen Energy (NXE), Core Natural Resources (CNR), and Alliance Resource Partners (ARLP). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size.

How does Peabody Energy compare to Alpha Metallurgical Resources?

Peabody Energy (NYSE:BTU) and Alpha Metallurgical Resources (NYSE:AMR) are related mid-cap companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, media sentiment, dividends and valuation.

Peabody Energy has a beta of 0.33, meaning that its share price is 67% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alpha Metallurgical Resources has a beta of 0.85, meaning that its share price is 15% less volatile than the broader market.

Peabody Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Alpha Metallurgical Resources. Alpha Metallurgical Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Peabody Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Peabody Energy$3.86B0.78-$52.90M-$1.50N/A
Alpha Metallurgical Resources$2.13B1.02-$61.69M-$3.58N/A

87.4% of Peabody Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.3% of Alpha Metallurgical Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Peabody Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 18.2% of Alpha Metallurgical Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Alpha Metallurgical Resources has a net margin of -2.23% compared to Peabody Energy's net margin of -4.56%. Alpha Metallurgical Resources' return on equity of -2.99% beat Peabody Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Peabody Energy-4.56% -5.22% -3.22%
Alpha Metallurgical Resources -2.23%-2.99%-2.01%

Peabody Energy currently has a consensus target price of $33.88, indicating a potential upside of 36.57%. Alpha Metallurgical Resources has a consensus target price of $176.00, indicating a potential upside of 2.37%. Given Peabody Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Peabody Energy is more favorable than Alpha Metallurgical Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Peabody Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.17
Alpha Metallurgical Resources
2 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.71

In the previous week, Peabody Energy had 6 more articles in the media than Alpha Metallurgical Resources. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Peabody Energy and 4 mentions for Alpha Metallurgical Resources. Peabody Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Alpha Metallurgical Resources' score of 0.37 indicating that Peabody Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Peabody Energy
2 Very Positive mention(s)
6 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Alpha Metallurgical Resources
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Peabody Energy beats Alpha Metallurgical Resources on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Peabody Energy compare to Warrior Met Coal?

Warrior Met Coal (NYSE:HCC) and Peabody Energy (NYSE:BTU) are related mid-cap companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, dividends, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Warrior Met Coal has a net margin of 13.05% compared to Peabody Energy's net margin of -4.56%. Warrior Met Coal's return on equity of 10.02% beat Peabody Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Warrior Met Coal13.05% 10.02% 7.84%
Peabody Energy -4.56%-5.22%-3.22%

Warrior Met Coal presently has a consensus target price of $103.83, suggesting a potential upside of 16.21%. Peabody Energy has a consensus target price of $33.88, suggesting a potential upside of 36.57%. Given Peabody Energy's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Peabody Energy is more favorable than Warrior Met Coal.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Warrior Met Coal
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Peabody Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.17

In the previous week, Peabody Energy had 9 more articles in the media than Warrior Met Coal. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Peabody Energy and 1 mentions for Warrior Met Coal. Peabody Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Warrior Met Coal's score of 0.86 indicating that Peabody Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Warrior Met Coal
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Peabody Energy
2 Very Positive mention(s)
6 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Warrior Met Coal pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Peabody Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Warrior Met Coal pays out 7.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Peabody Energy pays out -20.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Warrior Met Coal has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Peabody Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Peabody Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Warrior Met Coal has a beta of 0.72, indicating that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Peabody Energy has a beta of 0.33, indicating that its stock price is 67% less volatile than the broader market.

Warrior Met Coal has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Peabody Energy. Peabody Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Warrior Met Coal, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Warrior Met Coal$1.68B2.81$57M$4.1621.48
Peabody Energy$3.86B0.78-$52.90M-$1.50N/A

92.3% of Warrior Met Coal shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.4% of Peabody Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of Warrior Met Coal shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Peabody Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Warrior Met Coal beats Peabody Energy on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Peabody Energy compare to NexGen Energy?

Peabody Energy (NYSE:BTU) and NexGen Energy (NYSE:NXE) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, profitability and risk.

Peabody Energy has a beta of 0.33, indicating that its stock price is 67% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, NexGen Energy has a beta of 1.45, indicating that its stock price is 45% more volatile than the broader market.

Peabody Energy currently has a consensus price target of $33.88, suggesting a potential upside of 36.57%. NexGen Energy has a consensus price target of $14.00, suggesting a potential upside of 55.47%. Given NexGen Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe NexGen Energy is more favorable than Peabody Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Peabody Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.17
NexGen Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57

Peabody Energy has higher revenue and earnings than NexGen Energy. NexGen Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Peabody Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Peabody Energy$3.86B0.78-$52.90M-$1.50N/A
NexGen EnergyN/AN/A-$221.63M-$0.40N/A

NexGen Energy has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Peabody Energy's net margin of -4.56%. NexGen Energy's return on equity of -1.16% beat Peabody Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Peabody Energy-4.56% -5.22% -3.22%
NexGen Energy N/A -1.16%-0.81%

In the previous week, Peabody Energy had 8 more articles in the media than NexGen Energy. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Peabody Energy and 2 mentions for NexGen Energy. NexGen Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat Peabody Energy's score of 0.94 indicating that NexGen Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Peabody Energy
2 Very Positive mention(s)
6 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
NexGen Energy
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

87.4% of Peabody Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.4% of NexGen Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Peabody Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.6% of NexGen Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

NexGen Energy beats Peabody Energy on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Peabody Energy compare to Core Natural Resources?

Core Natural Resources (NYSE:CNR) and Peabody Energy (NYSE:BTU) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, earnings, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

86.5% of Core Natural Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.4% of Peabody Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.5% of Core Natural Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Peabody Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Peabody Energy had 7 more articles in the media than Core Natural Resources. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Peabody Energy and 3 mentions for Core Natural Resources. Peabody Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Core Natural Resources' score of 0.87 indicating that Peabody Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Core Natural Resources
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Peabody Energy
2 Very Positive mention(s)
6 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Core Natural Resources has a net margin of 2.34% compared to Peabody Energy's net margin of -4.56%. Core Natural Resources' return on equity of 0.03% beat Peabody Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Core Natural Resources2.34% 0.03% 0.02%
Peabody Energy -4.56%-5.22%-3.22%

Core Natural Resources pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Peabody Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Core Natural Resources pays out 20.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Peabody Energy pays out -20.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Peabody Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Peabody Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Core Natural Resources presently has a consensus target price of $115.00, indicating a potential upside of 29.47%. Peabody Energy has a consensus target price of $33.88, indicating a potential upside of 36.57%. Given Peabody Energy's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Peabody Energy is more favorable than Core Natural Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Core Natural Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83
Peabody Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.17

Core Natural Resources has a beta of 0.25, suggesting that its stock price is 75% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Peabody Energy has a beta of 0.33, suggesting that its stock price is 67% less volatile than the broader market.

Peabody Energy has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Core Natural Resources. Peabody Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Core Natural Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Core Natural Resources$4.16B1.06-$153.22M$1.9944.63
Peabody Energy$3.86B0.78-$52.90M-$1.50N/A

Summary

Core Natural Resources beats Peabody Energy on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Peabody Energy compare to Alliance Resource Partners?

Peabody Energy (NYSE:BTU) and Alliance Resource Partners (NASDAQ:ARLP) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings and institutional ownership.

Peabody Energy has a beta of 0.33, suggesting that its stock price is 67% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alliance Resource Partners has a beta of 0.34, suggesting that its stock price is 66% less volatile than the broader market.

Peabody Energy presently has a consensus price target of $33.88, suggesting a potential upside of 36.57%. Given Peabody Energy's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Peabody Energy is more favorable than Alliance Resource Partners.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Peabody Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.17
Alliance Resource Partners
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

Peabody Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Alliance Resource Partners pays an annual dividend of $2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.8%. Peabody Energy pays out -20.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Alliance Resource Partners pays out 117.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Peabody Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

87.4% of Peabody Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.1% of Alliance Resource Partners shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Peabody Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 16.8% of Alliance Resource Partners shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Peabody Energy had 10 more articles in the media than Alliance Resource Partners. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Peabody Energy and 0 mentions for Alliance Resource Partners. Peabody Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Alliance Resource Partners' score of 0.00 indicating that Peabody Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Peabody Energy Positive
Alliance Resource Partners Neutral

Alliance Resource Partners has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Peabody Energy. Peabody Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Alliance Resource Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Peabody Energy$3.86B0.78-$52.90M-$1.50N/A
Alliance Resource Partners$2.19B1.44$311.16M$2.0511.97

Alliance Resource Partners has a net margin of 12.25% compared to Peabody Energy's net margin of -4.56%. Alliance Resource Partners' return on equity of 17.70% beat Peabody Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Peabody Energy-4.56% -5.22% -3.22%
Alliance Resource Partners 12.25%17.70%11.12%

Summary

Alliance Resource Partners beats Peabody Energy on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Peabody Energy News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BTU and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BTU and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BTU vs. The Competition

MetricPeabody EnergyOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels IndustryEnergy SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$3.02B$11.29B$9.84B$22.79B
Dividend Yield1.21%10.21%10.67%3.73%
P/E Ratio-16.5416.5619.2824.01
Price / Sales0.78656.84535.8521.42
Price / Cash9.0940.9836.9838.23
Price / Book0.844.444.014.64
Net Income-$52.90M$5.28B$4.35B$1.08B
7 Day Performance-2.64%-1.09%-1.12%-1.06%
1 Month Performance-10.16%-3.35%-3.44%-5.49%
1 Year Performance-22.70%28.07%28.80%5.13%

Peabody Energy Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BTU
Peabody Energy
4.2866 of 5 stars
$24.80
+0.3%
$33.88
+36.6%
-15.2%$3.02B$3.86BN/A5,400
AMR
Alpha Metallurgical Resources
2.6561 of 5 stars
$175.20
+0.4%
$176.00
+0.5%
+3.0%$2.21B$2.13BN/A3,960
HCC
Warrior Met Coal
4.5056 of 5 stars
$91.71
+2.5%
$103.83
+13.2%
+38.2%$4.73B$1.31B22.051,485
NXE
NexGen Energy
1.737 of 5 stars
$9.01
-2.0%
$14.00
+55.5%
+2.0%$6.15BN/AN/A142
CNR
Core Natural Resources
3.9239 of 5 stars
$88.49
-0.6%
$115.00
+30.0%
+3.6%$4.42B$4.16B44.474,850

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:BTU) was last updated on 10/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners