Does the media favor AMR or BTU?

In the previous week, Peabody Energy had 2 more articles in the media than Alpha Metallurgical Resources. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Peabody Energy and 4 mentions for Alpha Metallurgical Resources. Peabody Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat Alpha Metallurgical Resources' score of -0.03 indicating that Peabody Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Alpha Metallurgical Resources 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Peabody Energy 2 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor BTU or HCC?

In the previous week, Peabody Energy had 4 more articles in the media than Warrior Met Coal. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Peabody Energy and 2 mentions for Warrior Met Coal. Warrior Met Coal's average media sentiment score of 1.36 beat Peabody Energy's score of 0.77 indicating that Warrior Met Coal is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Peabody Energy 2 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Warrior Met Coal 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer BTU or ARLP?

In the previous week, Peabody Energy had 3 more articles in the media than Alliance Resource Partners. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Peabody Energy and 3 mentions for Alliance Resource Partners. Alliance Resource Partners' average media sentiment score of 1.31 beat Peabody Energy's score of 0.77 indicating that Alliance Resource Partners is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Peabody Energy 2 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Alliance Resource Partners 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer NRP or BTU?

Peabody Energy has a consensus price target of $34.13, suggesting a potential upside of 13.44%. Given Peabody Energy's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Peabody Energy is more favorable than Natural Resource Partners. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Natural Resource Partners 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Peabody Energy 2 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Does the media favor NRP or BTU?

In the previous week, Peabody Energy had 2 more articles in the media than Natural Resource Partners. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Peabody Energy and 4 mentions for Natural Resource Partners. Natural Resource Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Peabody Energy's score of 0.77 indicating that Natural Resource Partners is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Natural Resource Partners 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Peabody Energy 2 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor BTU or METC?

In the previous week, Peabody Energy had 2 more articles in the media than Ramaco Resources. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Peabody Energy and 4 mentions for Ramaco Resources. Ramaco Resources' average media sentiment score of 1.13 beat Peabody Energy's score of 0.77 indicating that Ramaco Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Peabody Energy 2 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Ramaco Resources 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Peabody Energy (BTU) Competitors

$30.08 +0.46 (+1.56%)

Closing price 06/3/2026 03:58 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$29.85 -0.23 (-0.77%)

As of 06/3/2026 07:59 PM Eastern

Compare

BTU vs. AMR, HCC, ARLP, NRP, and METC

Should you buy Peabody Energy stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Peabody Energy with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Peabody Energy include Alpha Metallurgical Resources (AMR), Warrior Met Coal (HCC), Alliance Resource Partners (ARLP), Natural Resource Partners (NRP), and Ramaco Resources (METC).

How does Peabody Energy compare to Alpha Metallurgical Resources?

Alpha Metallurgical Resources (NYSE:AMR) and Peabody Energy (NYSE:BTU) are both mid-cap coal companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, dividends and valuation.

Alpha Metallurgical Resources currently has a consensus price target of $195.33, indicating a potential downside of 8.20%. Peabody Energy has a consensus price target of $34.13, indicating a potential upside of 13.44%. Given Peabody Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Peabody Energy is more favorable than Alpha Metallurgical Resources.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Alpha Metallurgical Resources	2 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.67
Peabody Energy	2 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Alpha Metallurgical Resources has a beta of 0.62, suggesting that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Peabody Energy has a beta of 0.36, suggesting that its stock price is 64% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Peabody Energy had 2 more articles in the media than Alpha Metallurgical Resources. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Peabody Energy and 4 mentions for Alpha Metallurgical Resources. Peabody Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat Alpha Metallurgical Resources' score of -0.03 indicating that Peabody Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Alpha Metallurgical Resources	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Peabody Energy	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Alpha Metallurgical Resources has a net margin of -1.83% compared to Peabody Energy's net margin of -3.07%. Alpha Metallurgical Resources' return on equity of -2.47% beat Peabody Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Alpha Metallurgical Resources	-1.83%	-2.47%	-1.67%
Peabody Energy	-3.07%	-2.80%	-1.75%

Peabody Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Alpha Metallurgical Resources. Alpha Metallurgical Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Peabody Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Alpha Metallurgical Resources	$2.13B	1.27	-$61.69M	-$3.00	N/A
Peabody Energy	$3.86B	0.95	-$52.90M	-$0.99	N/A

84.3% of Alpha Metallurgical Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.4% of Peabody Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 18.2% of Alpha Metallurgical Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Peabody Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Peabody Energy beats Alpha Metallurgical Resources on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Peabody Energy compare to Warrior Met Coal?

Peabody Energy (NYSE:BTU) and Warrior Met Coal (NYSE:HCC) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Warrior Met Coal has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Peabody Energy. Peabody Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Warrior Met Coal, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Peabody Energy	$3.86B	0.95	-$52.90M	-$0.99	N/A
Warrior Met Coal	$1.31B	4.25	$57M	$2.62	40.26

Peabody Energy has a beta of 0.36, suggesting that its share price is 64% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Warrior Met Coal has a beta of 0.62, suggesting that its share price is 38% less volatile than the broader market.

Peabody Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Warrior Met Coal pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Peabody Energy pays out -30.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Warrior Met Coal pays out 12.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Peabody Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Warrior Met Coal has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Peabody Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Peabody Energy had 4 more articles in the media than Warrior Met Coal. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Peabody Energy and 2 mentions for Warrior Met Coal. Warrior Met Coal's average media sentiment score of 1.36 beat Peabody Energy's score of 0.77 indicating that Warrior Met Coal is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Peabody Energy	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Warrior Met Coal	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Warrior Met Coal has a net margin of 9.36% compared to Peabody Energy's net margin of -3.07%. Warrior Met Coal's return on equity of 6.44% beat Peabody Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Peabody Energy	-3.07%	-2.80%	-1.75%
Warrior Met Coal	9.36%	6.44%	5.03%

Peabody Energy currently has a consensus target price of $34.13, indicating a potential upside of 13.44%. Warrior Met Coal has a consensus target price of $102.80, indicating a potential downside of 2.54%. Given Peabody Energy's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Peabody Energy is more favorable than Warrior Met Coal.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Peabody Energy	2 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Warrior Met Coal	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.43

87.4% of Peabody Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.3% of Warrior Met Coal shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Peabody Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Warrior Met Coal shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Warrior Met Coal beats Peabody Energy on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Peabody Energy compare to Alliance Resource Partners?

Peabody Energy (NYSE:BTU) and Alliance Resource Partners (NASDAQ:ARLP) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends and risk.

Peabody Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Alliance Resource Partners pays an annual dividend of $2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.4%. Peabody Energy pays out -30.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Alliance Resource Partners pays out 126.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Peabody Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Peabody Energy has a beta of 0.36, indicating that its share price is 64% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alliance Resource Partners has a beta of 0.23, indicating that its share price is 77% less volatile than the broader market.

Alliance Resource Partners has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Peabody Energy. Peabody Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Alliance Resource Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Peabody Energy	$3.86B	0.95	-$52.90M	-$0.99	N/A
Alliance Resource Partners	$2.19B	1.49	$311.16M	$1.90	13.37

Peabody Energy presently has a consensus target price of $34.13, indicating a potential upside of 13.44%. Alliance Resource Partners has a consensus target price of $30.00, indicating a potential upside of 18.06%. Given Alliance Resource Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Alliance Resource Partners is more favorable than Peabody Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Peabody Energy	2 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Alliance Resource Partners	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

In the previous week, Peabody Energy had 3 more articles in the media than Alliance Resource Partners. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Peabody Energy and 3 mentions for Alliance Resource Partners. Alliance Resource Partners' average media sentiment score of 1.31 beat Peabody Energy's score of 0.77 indicating that Alliance Resource Partners is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Peabody Energy	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Alliance Resource Partners	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Alliance Resource Partners has a net margin of 11.35% compared to Peabody Energy's net margin of -3.07%. Alliance Resource Partners' return on equity of 16.87% beat Peabody Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Peabody Energy	-3.07%	-2.80%	-1.75%
Alliance Resource Partners	11.35%	16.87%	10.70%

87.4% of Peabody Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.1% of Alliance Resource Partners shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Peabody Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 16.8% of Alliance Resource Partners shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Alliance Resource Partners beats Peabody Energy on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Peabody Energy compare to Natural Resource Partners?

Natural Resource Partners (NYSE:NRP) and Peabody Energy (NYSE:BTU) are both energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and valuation.

Natural Resource Partners has a beta of 0.14, meaning that its stock price is 86% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Peabody Energy has a beta of 0.36, meaning that its stock price is 64% less volatile than the broader market.

31.8% of Natural Resource Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.4% of Peabody Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 35.3% of Natural Resource Partners shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Peabody Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Natural Resource Partners has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Peabody Energy. Peabody Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Natural Resource Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Natural Resource Partners	$207.28M	6.75	$136.37M	$8.51	12.41
Peabody Energy	$3.86B	0.95	-$52.90M	-$0.99	N/A

In the previous week, Peabody Energy had 2 more articles in the media than Natural Resource Partners. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Peabody Energy and 4 mentions for Natural Resource Partners. Natural Resource Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Peabody Energy's score of 0.77 indicating that Natural Resource Partners is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Natural Resource Partners	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Peabody Energy	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Natural Resource Partners pays an annual dividend of $3.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Peabody Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Natural Resource Partners pays out 35.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Peabody Energy pays out -30.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Peabody Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Peabody Energy has a consensus price target of $34.13, suggesting a potential upside of 13.44%. Given Peabody Energy's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Peabody Energy is more favorable than Natural Resource Partners.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Natural Resource Partners	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Peabody Energy	2 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Natural Resource Partners has a net margin of 61.28% compared to Peabody Energy's net margin of -3.07%. Natural Resource Partners' return on equity of 18.49% beat Peabody Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Natural Resource Partners	61.28%	18.49%	15.03%
Peabody Energy	-3.07%	-2.80%	-1.75%

Summary

Natural Resource Partners beats Peabody Energy on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Peabody Energy compare to Ramaco Resources?

Peabody Energy (NYSE:BTU) and Ramaco Resources (NASDAQ:METC) are both energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and media sentiment.

Peabody Energy currently has a consensus price target of $34.13, indicating a potential upside of 13.44%. Ramaco Resources has a consensus price target of $27.29, indicating a potential upside of 61.84%. Given Ramaco Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Ramaco Resources is more favorable than Peabody Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Peabody Energy	2 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Ramaco Resources	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.56

Peabody Energy has a beta of 0.36, indicating that its share price is 64% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ramaco Resources has a beta of 1.31, indicating that its share price is 31% more volatile than the broader market.

Ramaco Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Peabody Energy. Peabody Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ramaco Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Peabody Energy	$3.86B	0.95	-$52.90M	-$0.99	N/A
Ramaco Resources	$536.62M	2.05	-$51.45M	-$1.10	N/A

In the previous week, Peabody Energy had 2 more articles in the media than Ramaco Resources. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Peabody Energy and 4 mentions for Ramaco Resources. Ramaco Resources' average media sentiment score of 1.13 beat Peabody Energy's score of 0.77 indicating that Ramaco Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Peabody Energy	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Ramaco Resources	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Peabody Energy has a net margin of -3.07% compared to Ramaco Resources' net margin of -11.52%. Peabody Energy's return on equity of -2.80% beat Ramaco Resources' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Peabody Energy	-3.07%	-2.80%	-1.75%
Ramaco Resources	-11.52%	-13.44%	-6.42%

87.4% of Peabody Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 74.5% of Ramaco Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Peabody Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 46.1% of Ramaco Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Ramaco Resources beats Peabody Energy on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Peabody Energy News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BTU and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

BTU vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Peabody Energy	COAL Industry	Energy Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$3.61B	$10.63B	$10.37B	$23.28B
Dividend Yield	1.01%	3.41%	10.42%	4.06%
P/E Ratio	-30.39	12.47	20.50	31.00
Price / Sales	0.95	1.63	839.95	23.82
Price / Cash	10.85	10.72	38.70	24.93
Price / Book	1.02	1.59	4.38	4.67
Net Income	-$52.90M	$618.93M	$4.23B	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	3.29%	2.25%	1.70%	-1.10%
1 Month Performance	N/A	N/A	N/A	0.25%
1 Year Performance	124.17%	43.44%	51.34%	25.20%

Peabody Energy Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
BTU Peabody Energy	3.0875 of 5 stars	$30.08 +1.6%	$34.13 +13.4%	+129.7%	$3.61B	$3.86B	N/A	5,400
AMR Alpha Metallurgical Resources	2.1073 of 5 stars	$215.71 +8.4%	$195.33 -9.4%	+90.9%	$2.53B	$2.13B	N/A	3,960	Gap Up
HCC Warrior Met Coal	3.1172 of 5 stars	$106.33 +12.5%	$102.80 -3.3%	+129.1%	$4.99B	$1.47B	40.59	1,485	Positive News Gap Down
ARLP Alliance Resource Partners	3.9169 of 5 stars	$25.31 +1.9%	$30.00 +18.5%	-2.2%	$3.20B	$2.19B	13.32	3,575	Positive News
NRP Natural Resource Partners	2.0298 of 5 stars	$107.35 +3.3%	N/A	+10.3%	$1.38B	$193.84M	12.61	50

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:BTU) was last updated on 6/4/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Peabody Energy (BTU) Competitors

BTU vs. AMR, HCC, ARLP, NRP, and METC

How does Peabody Energy compare to Alpha Metallurgical Resources?

Summary

How does Peabody Energy compare to Warrior Met Coal?

Summary

How does Peabody Energy compare to Alliance Resource Partners?

Summary

How does Peabody Energy compare to Natural Resource Partners?

Summary

How does Peabody Energy compare to Ramaco Resources?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

BTU vs. The Competition

Peabody Energy Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Peabody Energy (BTU) Competitors

BTU vs. AMR, HCC, ARLP, NRP, and METC

How does Peabody Energy compare to Alpha Metallurgical Resources?

Do analysts recommend AMR or BTU?

Which has more risk & volatility, AMR or BTU?

Does the media favor AMR or BTU?

Is AMR or BTU more profitable?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, AMR or BTU?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in AMR or BTU?

Summary

How does Peabody Energy compare to Warrior Met Coal?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, BTU or HCC?

Which has more volatility and risk, BTU or HCC?

Is BTU or HCC a better dividend stock?

Does the media favor BTU or HCC?

Is BTU or HCC more profitable?

Do analysts rate BTU or HCC?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in BTU or HCC?

Summary

How does Peabody Energy compare to Alliance Resource Partners?

Is BTU or ARLP a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk and volatility, BTU or ARLP?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, BTU or ARLP?

Do analysts prefer BTU or ARLP?

Does the media prefer BTU or ARLP?

Is BTU or ARLP more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of BTU or ARLP?

Summary

How does Peabody Energy compare to Natural Resource Partners?

Which has more risk & volatility, NRP or BTU?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in NRP or BTU?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, NRP or BTU?

Does the media favor NRP or BTU?

Is NRP or BTU a better dividend stock?

Do analysts prefer NRP or BTU?

Is NRP or BTU more profitable?

Summary

How does Peabody Energy compare to Ramaco Resources?

Do analysts prefer BTU or METC?

Which has more volatility and risk, BTU or METC?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, BTU or METC?

Does the media favor BTU or METC?

Is BTU or METC more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in BTU or METC?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

BTU vs. The Competition

Peabody Energy Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools