Go Pro

Peabody Energy (BTU) Competitors

Peabody Energy logo
$27.64 +0.03 (+0.11%)
As of 08/21/2026 03:58 PM Eastern

BTU vs. AMR, HCC, NXE, CNR, and LEU

Should you buy Peabody Energy stock or one of its competitors? Peabody Energy's main competitors and comparable companies include Alpha Metallurgical Resources (AMR), Warrior Met Coal (HCC), NexGen Energy (NXE), Core Natural Resources (CNR), and Centrus Energy (LEU). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size.

How does Peabody Energy compare to Alpha Metallurgical Resources?

Alpha Metallurgical Resources (NYSE:AMR) and Peabody Energy (NYSE:BTU) are related mid-cap companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Alpha Metallurgical Resources pays an annual dividend of $2.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Peabody Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Alpha Metallurgical Resources pays out -55.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Peabody Energy pays out -20.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Peabody Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Peabody Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Alpha Metallurgical Resources currently has a consensus target price of $176.00, suggesting a potential downside of 16.55%. Peabody Energy has a consensus target price of $33.88, suggesting a potential upside of 22.56%. Given Peabody Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Peabody Energy is more favorable than Alpha Metallurgical Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Alpha Metallurgical Resources
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.86
Peabody Energy
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Alpha Metallurgical Resources has a beta of 0.65, meaning that its share price is 35% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Peabody Energy has a beta of 0.34, meaning that its share price is 66% less volatile than the broader market.

Alpha Metallurgical Resources has a net margin of -2.23% compared to Peabody Energy's net margin of -4.56%. Alpha Metallurgical Resources' return on equity of -2.99% beat Peabody Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Alpha Metallurgical Resources-2.23% -2.99% -2.01%
Peabody Energy -4.56%-5.22%-3.22%

Peabody Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Alpha Metallurgical Resources. Alpha Metallurgical Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Peabody Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Alpha Metallurgical Resources$2.07B1.29-$61.69M-$3.58N/A
Peabody Energy$3.86B0.87-$52.90M-$1.50N/A

84.3% of Alpha Metallurgical Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.4% of Peabody Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 18.2% of Alpha Metallurgical Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Peabody Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Peabody Energy had 24 more articles in the media than Alpha Metallurgical Resources. MarketBeat recorded 34 mentions for Peabody Energy and 10 mentions for Alpha Metallurgical Resources. Alpha Metallurgical Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Peabody Energy's score of 0.14 indicating that Alpha Metallurgical Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Alpha Metallurgical Resources
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Peabody Energy
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
30 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Peabody Energy beats Alpha Metallurgical Resources on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Peabody Energy compare to Warrior Met Coal?

Warrior Met Coal (NYSE:HCC) and Peabody Energy (NYSE:BTU) are related mid-cap companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, dividends, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Warrior Met Coal presently has a consensus price target of $102.60, suggesting a potential downside of 3.82%. Peabody Energy has a consensus price target of $33.88, suggesting a potential upside of 22.56%. Given Peabody Energy's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Peabody Energy is more favorable than Warrior Met Coal.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Warrior Met Coal
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57
Peabody Energy
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

In the previous week, Peabody Energy had 18 more articles in the media than Warrior Met Coal. MarketBeat recorded 34 mentions for Peabody Energy and 16 mentions for Warrior Met Coal. Warrior Met Coal's average media sentiment score of 1.05 beat Peabody Energy's score of 0.14 indicating that Warrior Met Coal is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Warrior Met Coal
12 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Peabody Energy
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
30 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Warrior Met Coal pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Peabody Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Warrior Met Coal pays out 7.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Peabody Energy pays out -20.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Warrior Met Coal has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Peabody Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Peabody Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

92.3% of Warrior Met Coal shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.4% of Peabody Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of Warrior Met Coal shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Peabody Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Warrior Met Coal has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Peabody Energy. Peabody Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Warrior Met Coal, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Warrior Met Coal$1.68B3.35$57M$4.1625.64
Peabody Energy$3.86B0.87-$52.90M-$1.50N/A

Warrior Met Coal has a beta of 0.65, meaning that its stock price is 35% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Peabody Energy has a beta of 0.34, meaning that its stock price is 66% less volatile than the broader market.

Warrior Met Coal has a net margin of 13.05% compared to Peabody Energy's net margin of -4.56%. Warrior Met Coal's return on equity of 10.02% beat Peabody Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Warrior Met Coal13.05% 10.02% 7.84%
Peabody Energy -4.56%-5.22%-3.22%

Summary

Warrior Met Coal beats Peabody Energy on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Peabody Energy compare to NexGen Energy?

NexGen Energy (NYSE:NXE) and Peabody Energy (NYSE:BTU) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Peabody Energy has a consensus target price of $33.88, suggesting a potential upside of 22.56%. Given Peabody Energy's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Peabody Energy is more favorable than NexGen Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
NexGen Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40
Peabody Energy
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

NexGen Energy has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Peabody Energy's net margin of -4.56%. NexGen Energy's return on equity of -1.16% beat Peabody Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
NexGen EnergyN/A -1.16% -0.81%
Peabody Energy -4.56%-5.22%-3.22%

NexGen Energy has a beta of 1.4, indicating that its stock price is 40% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Peabody Energy has a beta of 0.34, indicating that its stock price is 66% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Peabody Energy had 14 more articles in the media than NexGen Energy. MarketBeat recorded 34 mentions for Peabody Energy and 20 mentions for NexGen Energy. NexGen Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.25 beat Peabody Energy's score of 0.14 indicating that NexGen Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
NexGen Energy
14 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Peabody Energy
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
30 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

42.4% of NexGen Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.4% of Peabody Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.6% of NexGen Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Peabody Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Peabody Energy has higher revenue and earnings than NexGen Energy. NexGen Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Peabody Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
NexGen EnergyN/AN/A-$221.63M-$0.40N/A
Peabody Energy$3.86B0.87-$52.90M-$1.50N/A

Summary

NexGen Energy beats Peabody Energy on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Peabody Energy compare to Core Natural Resources?

Core Natural Resources (NYSE:CNR) and Peabody Energy (NYSE:BTU) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, dividends, risk, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Core Natural Resources pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Peabody Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Core Natural Resources pays out 20.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Peabody Energy pays out -20.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Peabody Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Peabody Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Peabody Energy has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Core Natural Resources. Peabody Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Core Natural Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Core Natural Resources$4.16B1.13-$153.22M$1.9947.81
Peabody Energy$3.86B0.87-$52.90M-$1.50N/A

Core Natural Resources has a beta of 0.14, suggesting that its stock price is 86% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Peabody Energy has a beta of 0.34, suggesting that its stock price is 66% less volatile than the broader market.

Core Natural Resources has a net margin of 2.34% compared to Peabody Energy's net margin of -4.56%. Core Natural Resources' return on equity of 0.03% beat Peabody Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Core Natural Resources2.34% 0.03% 0.02%
Peabody Energy -4.56%-5.22%-3.22%

In the previous week, Peabody Energy had 29 more articles in the media than Core Natural Resources. MarketBeat recorded 34 mentions for Peabody Energy and 5 mentions for Core Natural Resources. Core Natural Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Peabody Energy's score of 0.14 indicating that Core Natural Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Core Natural Resources
1 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Peabody Energy
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
30 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

86.5% of Core Natural Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.4% of Peabody Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 2.5% of Core Natural Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Peabody Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Core Natural Resources currently has a consensus price target of $115.00, suggesting a potential upside of 20.87%. Peabody Energy has a consensus price target of $33.88, suggesting a potential upside of 22.56%. Given Peabody Energy's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Peabody Energy is more favorable than Core Natural Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Core Natural Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83
Peabody Energy
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Summary

Core Natural Resources beats Peabody Energy on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Peabody Energy compare to Centrus Energy?

Centrus Energy (NYSE:LEU) and Peabody Energy (NYSE:BTU) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, profitability, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Centrus Energy has a beta of 1.36, indicating that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Peabody Energy has a beta of 0.34, indicating that its stock price is 66% less volatile than the broader market.

Centrus Energy has a net margin of 10.23% compared to Peabody Energy's net margin of -4.56%. Centrus Energy's return on equity of 7.06% beat Peabody Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Centrus Energy10.23% 7.06% 2.01%
Peabody Energy -4.56%-5.22%-3.22%

50.0% of Centrus Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.4% of Peabody Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Centrus Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Peabody Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Peabody Energy had 27 more articles in the media than Centrus Energy. MarketBeat recorded 34 mentions for Peabody Energy and 7 mentions for Centrus Energy. Centrus Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.73 beat Peabody Energy's score of 0.14 indicating that Centrus Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Centrus Energy
2 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Peabody Energy
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
30 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Centrus Energy has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Peabody Energy. Peabody Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Centrus Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Centrus Energy$448.70M8.29$77.80M$2.2084.74
Peabody Energy$3.86B0.87-$52.90M-$1.50N/A

Centrus Energy currently has a consensus target price of $244.31, suggesting a potential upside of 31.05%. Peabody Energy has a consensus target price of $33.88, suggesting a potential upside of 22.56%. Given Centrus Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Centrus Energy is more favorable than Peabody Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Centrus Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Peabody Energy
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Summary

Centrus Energy beats Peabody Energy on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Peabody Energy News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BTU and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BTU and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BTU vs. The Competition

MetricPeabody EnergyOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels IndustryEnergy SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$3.37B$11.47B$10.02B$24.24B
Dividend Yield1.09%11.41%11.64%3.70%
P/E Ratio-18.4317.1820.6230.31
Price / Sales0.87434.75357.2520.17
Price / Cash10.1239.6836.0919.80
Price / Book0.944.373.974.90
Net Income-$52.90M$5.27B$4.33B$1.07B
7 Day Performance6.55%1.81%1.13%0.02%
1 Month Performance21.05%4.91%4.40%3.10%
1 Year Performance67.61%37.16%38.60%14.90%

Peabody Energy Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BTU
Peabody Energy
3.8219 of 5 stars
$27.64
+0.1%
$33.88
+22.6%
+67.6%$3.37B$3.86BN/A5,400
AMR
Alpha Metallurgical Resources
2.2089 of 5 stars
$169.88
+2.3%
$177.00
+4.2%
+49.1%$2.11B$2.13BN/A3,960
HCC
Warrior Met Coal
3.3102 of 5 stars
$98.40
+0.2%
$102.60
+4.3%
+79.6%$5.19B$1.31B23.651,485
NXE
NexGen Energy
0.9369 of 5 stars
$10.77
+3.7%
N/A+52.8%$6.95BN/AN/A60
CNR
Core Natural Resources
4.5183 of 5 stars
$95.45
-0.5%
$112.50
+17.9%
+31.7%$4.76B$4.16B47.964,850

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:BTU) was last updated on 8/24/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners