Does the media favor AMR or BTU?

In the previous week, Peabody Energy had 34 more articles in the media than Alpha Metallurgical Resources. MarketBeat recorded 39 mentions for Peabody Energy and 5 mentions for Alpha Metallurgical Resources. Alpha Metallurgical Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat Peabody Energy's score of 0.10 indicating that Alpha Metallurgical Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Alpha Metallurgical Resources 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Peabody Energy 6 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 31 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 2 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media favor HCC or BTU?

In the previous week, Peabody Energy had 35 more articles in the media than Warrior Met Coal. MarketBeat recorded 39 mentions for Peabody Energy and 4 mentions for Warrior Met Coal. Warrior Met Coal's average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat Peabody Energy's score of 0.10 indicating that Warrior Met Coal is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Warrior Met Coal 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Peabody Energy 6 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 31 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 2 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media favor BTU or ARLP?

In the previous week, Peabody Energy had 33 more articles in the media than Alliance Resource Partners. MarketBeat recorded 39 mentions for Peabody Energy and 6 mentions for Alliance Resource Partners. Alliance Resource Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.91 beat Peabody Energy's score of 0.10 indicating that Alliance Resource Partners is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Peabody Energy 6 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 31 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 2 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Alliance Resource Partners 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts recommend BTU or NRP?

Peabody Energy currently has a consensus price target of $34.13, indicating a potential upside of 44.27%. Given Peabody Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Peabody Energy is more favorable than Natural Resource Partners. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Peabody Energy 1 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.17 Natural Resource Partners 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Does the media refer more to BTU or METC?

In the previous week, Peabody Energy had 31 more articles in the media than Ramaco Resources. MarketBeat recorded 39 mentions for Peabody Energy and 8 mentions for Ramaco Resources. Peabody Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.10 beat Ramaco Resources' score of -0.01 indicating that Peabody Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Peabody Energy 6 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 31 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 2 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Ramaco Resources 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Peabody Energy (BTU) Competitors

$23.65 +0.28 (+1.22%)

Closing price 07/13/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$23.71 +0.06 (+0.25%)

As of 08:18 AM Eastern

Compare

BTU vs. AMR, HCC, ARLP, NRP, and METC

Should you buy Peabody Energy stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Peabody Energy with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Peabody Energy include Alpha Metallurgical Resources (AMR), Warrior Met Coal (HCC), Alliance Resource Partners (ARLP), Natural Resource Partners (NRP), and Ramaco Resources (METC).

How does Peabody Energy compare to Alpha Metallurgical Resources?

Alpha Metallurgical Resources (NYSE:AMR) and Peabody Energy (NYSE:BTU) are both coal companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership and valuation.

Alpha Metallurgical Resources has a net margin of -1.83% compared to Peabody Energy's net margin of -3.07%. Alpha Metallurgical Resources' return on equity of -2.47% beat Peabody Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Alpha Metallurgical Resources	-1.83%	-2.47%	-1.67%
Peabody Energy	-3.07%	-2.80%	-1.75%

Alpha Metallurgical Resources currently has a consensus price target of $187.75, indicating a potential upside of 26.27%. Peabody Energy has a consensus price target of $34.13, indicating a potential upside of 44.27%. Given Peabody Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Peabody Energy is more favorable than Alpha Metallurgical Resources.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Alpha Metallurgical Resources	2 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.71
Peabody Energy	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.17

84.3% of Alpha Metallurgical Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.4% of Peabody Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 18.2% of Alpha Metallurgical Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Peabody Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Alpha Metallurgical Resources has a beta of 0.63, meaning that its share price is 37% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Peabody Energy has a beta of 0.38, meaning that its share price is 62% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Peabody Energy had 34 more articles in the media than Alpha Metallurgical Resources. MarketBeat recorded 39 mentions for Peabody Energy and 5 mentions for Alpha Metallurgical Resources. Alpha Metallurgical Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat Peabody Energy's score of 0.10 indicating that Alpha Metallurgical Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Alpha Metallurgical Resources	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Peabody Energy	6 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	31 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	2 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Peabody Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Alpha Metallurgical Resources. Alpha Metallurgical Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Peabody Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Alpha Metallurgical Resources	$2.13B	0.89	-$61.69M	-$3.00	N/A
Peabody Energy	$3.86B	0.75	-$52.90M	-$0.99	N/A

Summary

Peabody Energy beats Alpha Metallurgical Resources on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Peabody Energy compare to Warrior Met Coal?

Warrior Met Coal (NYSE:HCC) and Peabody Energy (NYSE:BTU) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment and dividends.

Warrior Met Coal has a net margin of 9.36% compared to Peabody Energy's net margin of -3.07%. Warrior Met Coal's return on equity of 6.44% beat Peabody Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Warrior Met Coal	9.36%	6.44%	5.03%
Peabody Energy	-3.07%	-2.80%	-1.75%

In the previous week, Peabody Energy had 35 more articles in the media than Warrior Met Coal. MarketBeat recorded 39 mentions for Peabody Energy and 4 mentions for Warrior Met Coal. Warrior Met Coal's average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat Peabody Energy's score of 0.10 indicating that Warrior Met Coal is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Warrior Met Coal	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Peabody Energy	6 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	31 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	2 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Warrior Met Coal has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Peabody Energy. Peabody Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Warrior Met Coal, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Warrior Met Coal	$1.31B	3.31	$57M	$2.62	31.34
Peabody Energy	$3.86B	0.75	-$52.90M	-$0.99	N/A

Warrior Met Coal pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Peabody Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Warrior Met Coal pays out 12.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Peabody Energy pays out -30.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Warrior Met Coal has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Peabody Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Peabody Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Warrior Met Coal presently has a consensus price target of $103.00, suggesting a potential upside of 25.44%. Peabody Energy has a consensus price target of $34.13, suggesting a potential upside of 44.27%. Given Peabody Energy's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Peabody Energy is more favorable than Warrior Met Coal.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Warrior Met Coal	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.86
Peabody Energy	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.17

Warrior Met Coal has a beta of 0.65, suggesting that its share price is 35% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Peabody Energy has a beta of 0.38, suggesting that its share price is 62% less volatile than the broader market.

92.3% of Warrior Met Coal shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.4% of Peabody Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of Warrior Met Coal shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Peabody Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Warrior Met Coal beats Peabody Energy on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Peabody Energy compare to Alliance Resource Partners?

Peabody Energy (NYSE:BTU) and Alliance Resource Partners (NASDAQ:ARLP) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

Alliance Resource Partners has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Peabody Energy. Peabody Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Alliance Resource Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Peabody Energy	$3.86B	0.75	-$52.90M	-$0.99	N/A
Alliance Resource Partners	$2.19B	1.45	$311.16M	$1.90	12.99

In the previous week, Peabody Energy had 33 more articles in the media than Alliance Resource Partners. MarketBeat recorded 39 mentions for Peabody Energy and 6 mentions for Alliance Resource Partners. Alliance Resource Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.91 beat Peabody Energy's score of 0.10 indicating that Alliance Resource Partners is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Peabody Energy	6 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	31 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	2 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Alliance Resource Partners	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Alliance Resource Partners has a net margin of 11.35% compared to Peabody Energy's net margin of -3.07%. Alliance Resource Partners' return on equity of 16.87% beat Peabody Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Peabody Energy	-3.07%	-2.80%	-1.75%
Alliance Resource Partners	11.35%	16.87%	10.70%

Peabody Energy has a beta of 0.38, meaning that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alliance Resource Partners has a beta of 0.23, meaning that its stock price is 77% less volatile than the broader market.

Peabody Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Alliance Resource Partners pays an annual dividend of $2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.7%. Peabody Energy pays out -30.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Alliance Resource Partners pays out 126.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Peabody Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Peabody Energy currently has a consensus price target of $34.13, indicating a potential upside of 44.27%. Alliance Resource Partners has a consensus price target of $30.00, indicating a potential upside of 21.51%. Given Peabody Energy's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Peabody Energy is more favorable than Alliance Resource Partners.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Peabody Energy	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.17
Alliance Resource Partners	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

87.4% of Peabody Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.1% of Alliance Resource Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Peabody Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 16.8% of Alliance Resource Partners shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Alliance Resource Partners beats Peabody Energy on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Peabody Energy compare to Natural Resource Partners?

Peabody Energy (NYSE:BTU) and Natural Resource Partners (NYSE:NRP) are both energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, profitability, valuation, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Peabody Energy currently has a consensus price target of $34.13, indicating a potential upside of 44.27%. Given Peabody Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Peabody Energy is more favorable than Natural Resource Partners.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Peabody Energy	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.17
Natural Resource Partners	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Natural Resource Partners has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Peabody Energy. Peabody Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Natural Resource Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Peabody Energy	$3.86B	0.75	-$52.90M	-$0.99	N/A
Natural Resource Partners	$207.28M	6.37	$136.37M	$8.51	11.72

In the previous week, Peabody Energy had 39 more articles in the media than Natural Resource Partners. MarketBeat recorded 39 mentions for Peabody Energy and 0 mentions for Natural Resource Partners. Peabody Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.10 beat Natural Resource Partners' score of 0.00 indicating that Peabody Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Peabody Energy	Neutral
Natural Resource Partners	Neutral

Peabody Energy has a beta of 0.38, meaning that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Natural Resource Partners has a beta of 0.15, meaning that its stock price is 85% less volatile than the broader market.

87.4% of Peabody Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.8% of Natural Resource Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Peabody Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 35.3% of Natural Resource Partners shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Natural Resource Partners has a net margin of 61.28% compared to Peabody Energy's net margin of -3.07%. Natural Resource Partners' return on equity of 18.49% beat Peabody Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Peabody Energy	-3.07%	-2.80%	-1.75%
Natural Resource Partners	61.28%	18.49%	15.03%

Peabody Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Natural Resource Partners pays an annual dividend of $3.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Peabody Energy pays out -30.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Natural Resource Partners pays out 35.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Peabody Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Summary

Peabody Energy beats Natural Resource Partners on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Peabody Energy compare to Ramaco Resources?

Peabody Energy (NYSE:BTU) and Ramaco Resources (NASDAQ:METC) are both energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and profitability.

Peabody Energy currently has a consensus target price of $34.13, suggesting a potential upside of 44.27%. Ramaco Resources has a consensus target price of $26.43, suggesting a potential upside of 109.25%. Given Ramaco Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Ramaco Resources is more favorable than Peabody Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Peabody Energy	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.17
Ramaco Resources	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.56

Peabody Energy has a net margin of -3.07% compared to Ramaco Resources' net margin of -11.52%. Peabody Energy's return on equity of -2.80% beat Ramaco Resources' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Peabody Energy	-3.07%	-2.80%	-1.75%
Ramaco Resources	-11.52%	-13.44%	-6.42%

Ramaco Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Peabody Energy. Peabody Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ramaco Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Peabody Energy	$3.86B	0.75	-$52.90M	-$0.99	N/A
Ramaco Resources	$536.62M	1.53	-$51.45M	-$1.10	N/A

Peabody Energy has a beta of 0.38, suggesting that its share price is 62% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ramaco Resources has a beta of 1.35, suggesting that its share price is 35% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Peabody Energy had 31 more articles in the media than Ramaco Resources. MarketBeat recorded 39 mentions for Peabody Energy and 8 mentions for Ramaco Resources. Peabody Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.10 beat Ramaco Resources' score of -0.01 indicating that Peabody Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Peabody Energy	6 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	31 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	2 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Ramaco Resources	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

87.4% of Peabody Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 74.5% of Ramaco Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Peabody Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 46.1% of Ramaco Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Ramaco Resources beats Peabody Energy on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Peabody Energy News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BTU and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

BTU vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Peabody Energy	COAL Industry	Energy Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$2.85B	$9.29B	$9.79B	$23.46B
Dividend Yield	1.28%	3.46%	10.72%	4.02%
P/E Ratio	-23.89	10.81	19.05	31.08
Price / Sales	0.75	1.42	634.34	19.77
Price / Cash	8.56	9.18	36.83	18.64
Price / Book	0.80	1.35	4.13	4.77
Net Income	-$52.90M	$638.69M	$4.24B	$1.06B
7 Day Performance	4.18%	2.62%	1.73%	-0.23%
1 Month Performance	-13.42%	-12.81%	-4.38%	-0.11%
1 Year Performance	58.27%	9.90%	28.64%	16.46%

Peabody Energy Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
BTU Peabody Energy	3.9658 of 5 stars	$23.65 +1.2%	$34.13 +44.3%	+54.7%	$2.85B	$3.86B	N/A	5,400	Trending News
AMR Alpha Metallurgical Resources	4.0923 of 5 stars	$158.08 -1.2%	$195.33 +23.6%	+21.0%	$2.03B	$2.13B	N/A	3,960
HCC Warrior Met Coal	4.8773 of 5 stars	$81.08 +0.3%	$103.00 +27.0%	+54.9%	$4.27B	$1.31B	30.95	1,485	Positive News
ARLP Alliance Resource Partners	4.4201 of 5 stars	$23.78 -0.1%	$30.00 +26.2%	-9.7%	$3.06B	$2.19B	12.52	3,575
NRP Natural Resource Partners	2.1759 of 5 stars	$97.55 -1.6%	N/A	+0.7%	$1.31B	$207.28M	11.46	50

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:BTU) was last updated on 7/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Peabody Energy (BTU) Competitors

BTU vs. AMR, HCC, ARLP, NRP, and METC

How does Peabody Energy compare to Alpha Metallurgical Resources?

Summary

How does Peabody Energy compare to Warrior Met Coal?

Summary

How does Peabody Energy compare to Alliance Resource Partners?

Summary

How does Peabody Energy compare to Natural Resource Partners?

Summary

How does Peabody Energy compare to Ramaco Resources?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

BTU vs. The Competition

Peabody Energy Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Peabody Energy (BTU) Competitors

BTU vs. AMR, HCC, ARLP, NRP, and METC

How does Peabody Energy compare to Alpha Metallurgical Resources?

Is AMR or BTU more profitable?

Do analysts prefer AMR or BTU?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in AMR or BTU?

Which has more risk & volatility, AMR or BTU?

Does the media favor AMR or BTU?

Which has better valuation and earnings, AMR or BTU?

Summary

How does Peabody Energy compare to Warrior Met Coal?

Is HCC or BTU more profitable?

Does the media favor HCC or BTU?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, HCC or BTU?

Is HCC or BTU a better dividend stock?

Do analysts recommend HCC or BTU?

Which has more volatility & risk, HCC or BTU?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in HCC or BTU?

Summary

How does Peabody Energy compare to Alliance Resource Partners?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, BTU or ARLP?

Does the media favor BTU or ARLP?

Is BTU or ARLP more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, BTU or ARLP?

Is BTU or ARLP a better dividend stock?

Do analysts rate BTU or ARLP?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in BTU or ARLP?

Summary

How does Peabody Energy compare to Natural Resource Partners?

Do analysts recommend BTU or NRP?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, BTU or NRP?

Does the media prefer BTU or NRP?

Which has more volatility & risk, BTU or NRP?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of BTU or NRP?

Is BTU or NRP more profitable?

Is BTU or NRP a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Peabody Energy compare to Ramaco Resources?

Do analysts rate BTU or METC?

Is BTU or METC more profitable?

Which has better earnings & valuation, BTU or METC?

Which has more risk and volatility, BTU or METC?

Does the media refer more to BTU or METC?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in BTU or METC?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

BTU vs. The Competition

Peabody Energy Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools