Does the media prefer AMR or BTU?

In the previous week, Peabody Energy had 50 more articles in the media than Alpha Metallurgical Resources. MarketBeat recorded 62 mentions for Peabody Energy and 12 mentions for Alpha Metallurgical Resources. Alpha Metallurgical Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.48 beat Peabody Energy's score of 0.16 indicating that Alpha Metallurgical Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Alpha Metallurgical Resources 5 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Peabody Energy 8 Very Positive mention(s) 11 Positive mention(s) 37 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media favor BTU or HCC?

In the previous week, Peabody Energy had 53 more articles in the media than Warrior Met Coal. MarketBeat recorded 62 mentions for Peabody Energy and 9 mentions for Warrior Met Coal. Warrior Met Coal's average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat Peabody Energy's score of 0.16 indicating that Warrior Met Coal is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Peabody Energy 8 Very Positive mention(s) 11 Positive mention(s) 37 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Warrior Met Coal 3 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor BTU or ARLP?

In the previous week, Peabody Energy had 32 more articles in the media than Alliance Resource Partners. MarketBeat recorded 62 mentions for Peabody Energy and 30 mentions for Alliance Resource Partners. Alliance Resource Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.56 beat Peabody Energy's score of 0.16 indicating that Alliance Resource Partners is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Peabody Energy 8 Very Positive mention(s) 11 Positive mention(s) 37 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Alliance Resource Partners 8 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate NRP or BTU?

Peabody Energy has a consensus target price of $34.88, indicating a potential upside of 60.43%. Given Peabody Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Peabody Energy is more favorable than Natural Resource Partners. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Natural Resource Partners 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Peabody Energy 1 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.17

Does the media prefer NRP or BTU?

In the previous week, Peabody Energy had 60 more articles in the media than Natural Resource Partners. MarketBeat recorded 62 mentions for Peabody Energy and 2 mentions for Natural Resource Partners. Natural Resource Partners' average media sentiment score of 1.29 beat Peabody Energy's score of 0.16 indicating that Natural Resource Partners is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Natural Resource Partners 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Peabody Energy 8 Very Positive mention(s) 11 Positive mention(s) 37 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media refer more to BTU or METC?

In the previous week, Peabody Energy had 57 more articles in the media than Ramaco Resources. MarketBeat recorded 62 mentions for Peabody Energy and 5 mentions for Ramaco Resources. Ramaco Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.43 beat Peabody Energy's score of 0.16 indicating that Ramaco Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Peabody Energy 8 Very Positive mention(s) 11 Positive mention(s) 37 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Ramaco Resources 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Peabody Energy (BTU) Competitors

$21.74 +0.42 (+1.97%)

Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$21.85 +0.11 (+0.50%)

As of 07:56 PM Eastern

Compare

BTU vs. AMR, HCC, ARLP, NRP, and METC

Should you buy Peabody Energy stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Peabody Energy with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Peabody Energy include Alpha Metallurgical Resources (AMR), Warrior Met Coal (HCC), Alliance Resource Partners (ARLP), Natural Resource Partners (NRP), and Ramaco Resources (METC).

How does Peabody Energy compare to Alpha Metallurgical Resources?

Alpha Metallurgical Resources (NYSE:AMR) and Peabody Energy (NYSE:BTU) are related companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation and dividends.

84.3% of Alpha Metallurgical Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.4% of Peabody Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 18.2% of Alpha Metallurgical Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Peabody Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Alpha Metallurgical Resources has a net margin of -1.83% compared to Peabody Energy's net margin of -4.56%. Alpha Metallurgical Resources' return on equity of -2.47% beat Peabody Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Alpha Metallurgical Resources	-1.83%	-2.47%	-1.67%
Peabody Energy	-4.56%	-5.22%	-3.22%

Alpha Metallurgical Resources presently has a consensus target price of $177.00, indicating a potential upside of 27.79%. Peabody Energy has a consensus target price of $34.88, indicating a potential upside of 60.43%. Given Peabody Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Peabody Energy is more favorable than Alpha Metallurgical Resources.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Alpha Metallurgical Resources	1 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.86
Peabody Energy	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.17

Peabody Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Alpha Metallurgical Resources. Alpha Metallurgical Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Peabody Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Alpha Metallurgical Resources	$2.13B	0.83	-$61.69M	-$3.00	N/A
Peabody Energy	$3.86B	0.69	-$52.90M	-$1.50	N/A

Alpha Metallurgical Resources has a beta of 0.65, indicating that its share price is 35% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Peabody Energy has a beta of 0.34, indicating that its share price is 66% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Peabody Energy had 50 more articles in the media than Alpha Metallurgical Resources. MarketBeat recorded 62 mentions for Peabody Energy and 12 mentions for Alpha Metallurgical Resources. Alpha Metallurgical Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.48 beat Peabody Energy's score of 0.16 indicating that Alpha Metallurgical Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Alpha Metallurgical Resources	5 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Peabody Energy	8 Very Positive mention(s)	11 Positive mention(s)	37 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Peabody Energy beats Alpha Metallurgical Resources on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Peabody Energy compare to Warrior Met Coal?

Peabody Energy (NYSE:BTU) and Warrior Met Coal (NYSE:HCC) are related mid-cap companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations and earnings.

87.4% of Peabody Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.3% of Warrior Met Coal shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Peabody Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Warrior Met Coal shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Peabody Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Warrior Met Coal pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Peabody Energy pays out -20.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Warrior Met Coal pays out 12.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Peabody Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Warrior Met Coal has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Peabody Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Peabody Energy currently has a consensus target price of $34.88, indicating a potential upside of 60.43%. Warrior Met Coal has a consensus target price of $103.00, indicating a potential upside of 27.99%. Given Peabody Energy's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Peabody Energy is more favorable than Warrior Met Coal.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Peabody Energy	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.17
Warrior Met Coal	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.86

Peabody Energy has a beta of 0.34, suggesting that its stock price is 66% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Warrior Met Coal has a beta of 0.65, suggesting that its stock price is 35% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Peabody Energy had 53 more articles in the media than Warrior Met Coal. MarketBeat recorded 62 mentions for Peabody Energy and 9 mentions for Warrior Met Coal. Warrior Met Coal's average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat Peabody Energy's score of 0.16 indicating that Warrior Met Coal is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Peabody Energy	8 Very Positive mention(s)	11 Positive mention(s)	37 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Warrior Met Coal	3 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Warrior Met Coal has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Peabody Energy. Peabody Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Warrior Met Coal, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Peabody Energy	$3.86B	0.69	-$52.90M	-$1.50	N/A
Warrior Met Coal	$1.31B	3.24	$57M	$2.62	30.71

Warrior Met Coal has a net margin of 9.36% compared to Peabody Energy's net margin of -4.56%. Warrior Met Coal's return on equity of 6.44% beat Peabody Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Peabody Energy	-4.56%	-5.22%	-3.22%
Warrior Met Coal	9.36%	6.44%	5.03%

Summary

Warrior Met Coal beats Peabody Energy on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Peabody Energy compare to Alliance Resource Partners?

Peabody Energy (NYSE:BTU) and Alliance Resource Partners (NASDAQ:ARLP) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, risk, valuation and profitability.

87.4% of Peabody Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.1% of Alliance Resource Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Peabody Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 16.8% of Alliance Resource Partners shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Alliance Resource Partners has a net margin of 12.25% compared to Peabody Energy's net margin of -4.56%. Alliance Resource Partners' return on equity of 17.61% beat Peabody Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Peabody Energy	-4.56%	-5.22%	-3.22%
Alliance Resource Partners	12.25%	17.61%	11.18%

Peabody Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Alliance Resource Partners pays an annual dividend of $2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.2%. Peabody Energy pays out -20.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Alliance Resource Partners pays out 117.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Peabody Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Alliance Resource Partners has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Peabody Energy. Peabody Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Alliance Resource Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Peabody Energy	$3.86B	0.69	-$52.90M	-$1.50	N/A
Alliance Resource Partners	$2.19B	1.53	$311.16M	$2.05	12.74

Peabody Energy has a beta of 0.34, suggesting that its share price is 66% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alliance Resource Partners has a beta of 0.22, suggesting that its share price is 78% less volatile than the broader market.

Peabody Energy currently has a consensus target price of $34.88, suggesting a potential upside of 60.43%. Alliance Resource Partners has a consensus target price of $30.00, suggesting a potential upside of 14.85%. Given Peabody Energy's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Peabody Energy is more favorable than Alliance Resource Partners.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Peabody Energy	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.17
Alliance Resource Partners	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

In the previous week, Peabody Energy had 32 more articles in the media than Alliance Resource Partners. MarketBeat recorded 62 mentions for Peabody Energy and 30 mentions for Alliance Resource Partners. Alliance Resource Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.56 beat Peabody Energy's score of 0.16 indicating that Alliance Resource Partners is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Peabody Energy	8 Very Positive mention(s)	11 Positive mention(s)	37 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Alliance Resource Partners	8 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Alliance Resource Partners beats Peabody Energy on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Peabody Energy compare to Natural Resource Partners?

Natural Resource Partners (NYSE:NRP) and Peabody Energy (NYSE:BTU) are both energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership and earnings.

31.8% of Natural Resource Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.4% of Peabody Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 35.3% of Natural Resource Partners shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Peabody Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Natural Resource Partners has a net margin of 61.28% compared to Peabody Energy's net margin of -4.56%. Natural Resource Partners' return on equity of 18.49% beat Peabody Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Natural Resource Partners	61.28%	18.49%	15.03%
Peabody Energy	-4.56%	-5.22%	-3.22%

Natural Resource Partners pays an annual dividend of $3.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Peabody Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Natural Resource Partners pays out 35.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Peabody Energy pays out -20.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Peabody Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Natural Resource Partners has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Peabody Energy. Peabody Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Natural Resource Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Natural Resource Partners	$207.28M	6.17	$136.37M	$8.51	11.34
Peabody Energy	$3.86B	0.69	-$52.90M	-$1.50	N/A

Natural Resource Partners has a beta of 0.15, indicating that its stock price is 85% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Peabody Energy has a beta of 0.34, indicating that its stock price is 66% less volatile than the broader market.

Peabody Energy has a consensus target price of $34.88, indicating a potential upside of 60.43%. Given Peabody Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Peabody Energy is more favorable than Natural Resource Partners.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Natural Resource Partners	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Peabody Energy	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.17

In the previous week, Peabody Energy had 60 more articles in the media than Natural Resource Partners. MarketBeat recorded 62 mentions for Peabody Energy and 2 mentions for Natural Resource Partners. Natural Resource Partners' average media sentiment score of 1.29 beat Peabody Energy's score of 0.16 indicating that Natural Resource Partners is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Natural Resource Partners	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Peabody Energy	8 Very Positive mention(s)	11 Positive mention(s)	37 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Natural Resource Partners beats Peabody Energy on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Peabody Energy compare to Ramaco Resources?

Peabody Energy (NYSE:BTU) and Ramaco Resources (NASDAQ:METC) are related companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability and earnings.

Peabody Energy has a net margin of -4.56% compared to Ramaco Resources' net margin of -11.52%. Peabody Energy's return on equity of -5.22% beat Ramaco Resources' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Peabody Energy	-4.56%	-5.22%	-3.22%
Ramaco Resources	-11.52%	-13.44%	-6.42%

87.4% of Peabody Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 74.5% of Ramaco Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Peabody Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 46.1% of Ramaco Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Peabody Energy has a beta of 0.34, indicating that its stock price is 66% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ramaco Resources has a beta of 1.37, indicating that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the broader market.

Ramaco Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Peabody Energy. Peabody Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ramaco Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Peabody Energy	$3.86B	0.69	-$52.90M	-$1.50	N/A
Ramaco Resources	$536.62M	1.08	-$51.45M	-$1.10	N/A

In the previous week, Peabody Energy had 57 more articles in the media than Ramaco Resources. MarketBeat recorded 62 mentions for Peabody Energy and 5 mentions for Ramaco Resources. Ramaco Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.43 beat Peabody Energy's score of 0.16 indicating that Ramaco Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Peabody Energy	8 Very Positive mention(s)	11 Positive mention(s)	37 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Ramaco Resources	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Peabody Energy currently has a consensus target price of $34.88, indicating a potential upside of 60.43%. Ramaco Resources has a consensus target price of $26.43, indicating a potential upside of 196.95%. Given Ramaco Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Ramaco Resources is more favorable than Peabody Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Peabody Energy	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.17
Ramaco Resources	2 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.44

Summary

Ramaco Resources beats Peabody Energy on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Peabody Energy News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BTU and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

BTU vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Peabody Energy	Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry	Energy Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$2.60B	$11.10B	$9.69B	$23.73B
Dividend Yield	1.41%	11.31%	11.57%	4.22%
P/E Ratio	-14.49	16.49	16.92	31.49
Price / Sales	0.69	469.88	385.28	20.19
Price / Cash	7.81	39.42	35.94	18.72
Price / Book	0.74	4.32	3.92	4.83
Net Income	-$52.90M	$5.28B	$4.35B	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	-5.91%	0.68%	0.49%	0.84%
1 Month Performance	-2.38%	4.33%	3.78%	0.59%
1 Year Performance	35.36%	33.82%	35.41%	20.55%

Peabody Energy Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
BTU Peabody Energy	4.3914 of 5 stars	$21.74 +2.0%	$34.88 +60.4%	+32.3%	$2.60B	$3.86B	N/A	5,400	Trending News Earnings Report Dividend Announcement
AMR Alpha Metallurgical Resources	4.4774 of 5 stars	$145.44 +1.7%	$181.50 +24.8%	+19.6%	$1.82B	$2.12B	N/A	3,960	Upcoming Earnings High Trading Volume
HCC Warrior Met Coal	4.4034 of 5 stars	$80.65 +0.7%	$103.00 +27.7%	+54.5%	$4.23B	$1.31B	30.78	1,485	Positive News Upcoming Earnings Dividend Announcement
ARLP Alliance Resource Partners	4.0355 of 5 stars	$25.63 +3.7%	$30.00 +17.1%	-2.4%	$3.18B	$2.19B	13.49	3,575	Earnings Report Dividend Announcement High Trading Volume
NRP Natural Resource Partners	2.0623 of 5 stars	$97.94 -0.1%	N/A	-3.0%	$1.30B	$207.28M	11.51	50	Positive News Upcoming Earnings

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:BTU) was last updated on 8/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Peabody Energy (BTU) Competitors

BTU vs. AMR, HCC, ARLP, NRP, and METC

How does Peabody Energy compare to Alpha Metallurgical Resources?

Summary

How does Peabody Energy compare to Warrior Met Coal?

Summary

How does Peabody Energy compare to Alliance Resource Partners?

Summary

How does Peabody Energy compare to Natural Resource Partners?

Summary

How does Peabody Energy compare to Ramaco Resources?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

BTU vs. The Competition

Peabody Energy Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Peabody Energy (BTU) Competitors

BTU vs. AMR, HCC, ARLP, NRP, and METC

How does Peabody Energy compare to Alpha Metallurgical Resources?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in AMR or BTU?

Is AMR or BTU more profitable?

Do analysts recommend AMR or BTU?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, AMR or BTU?

Which has more risk and volatility, AMR or BTU?

Does the media prefer AMR or BTU?

Summary

How does Peabody Energy compare to Warrior Met Coal?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in BTU or HCC?

Is BTU or HCC a better dividend stock?

Do analysts rate BTU or HCC?

Which has more volatility and risk, BTU or HCC?

Does the media favor BTU or HCC?

Which has better earnings and valuation, BTU or HCC?

Is BTU or HCC more profitable?

Summary

How does Peabody Energy compare to Alliance Resource Partners?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in BTU or ARLP?

Is BTU or ARLP more profitable?

Is BTU or ARLP a better dividend stock?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, BTU or ARLP?

Which has more volatility & risk, BTU or ARLP?

Do analysts recommend BTU or ARLP?

Does the media favor BTU or ARLP?

Summary

How does Peabody Energy compare to Natural Resource Partners?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in NRP or BTU?

Is NRP or BTU more profitable?

Is NRP or BTU a better dividend stock?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, NRP or BTU?

Which has more risk and volatility, NRP or BTU?

Do analysts rate NRP or BTU?

Does the media prefer NRP or BTU?

Summary

How does Peabody Energy compare to Ramaco Resources?

Is BTU or METC more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in BTU or METC?

Which has more risk & volatility, BTU or METC?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, BTU or METC?

Does the media refer more to BTU or METC?

Do analysts rate BTU or METC?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

BTU vs. The Competition

Peabody Energy Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools