Go Pro

Core Natural Resources (CNR) Competitors

Core Natural Resources logo
$83.94 +2.07 (+2.52%)
Closing price 07/13/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$84.44 +0.51 (+0.60%)
As of 07:35 AM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

CNR vs. CNX, HCC, HNRG, ARLP, and BTU

Should you buy Core Natural Resources stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Core Natural Resources with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Core Natural Resources include CNX Resources (CNX), Warrior Met Coal (HCC), Hallador Energy (HNRG), Alliance Resource Partners (ARLP), and Peabody Energy (BTU). These companies are all part of the "energy" sector.

How does Core Natural Resources compare to CNX Resources?

CNX Resources (NYSE:CNX) and Core Natural Resources (NYSE:CNR) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership and risk.

In the previous week, CNX Resources and CNX Resources both had 5 articles in the media. CNX Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.79 beat Core Natural Resources' score of 0.72 indicating that CNX Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
CNX Resources
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Core Natural Resources
2 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

95.2% of CNX Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.5% of Core Natural Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.0% of CNX Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.5% of Core Natural Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

CNX Resources has a net margin of 40.06% compared to Core Natural Resources' net margin of -1.49%. CNX Resources' return on equity of 10.65% beat Core Natural Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CNX Resources40.06% 10.65% 5.06%
Core Natural Resources -1.49%-1.69%-1.02%

CNX Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Core Natural Resources. Core Natural Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CNX Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CNX Resources$2.24B2.05$633.16M$7.204.50
Core Natural Resources$4.23B1.00-$153.22M-$1.22N/A

CNX Resources presently has a consensus price target of $35.44, suggesting a potential upside of 9.42%. Core Natural Resources has a consensus price target of $111.67, suggesting a potential upside of 33.04%. Given Core Natural Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Core Natural Resources is more favorable than CNX Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CNX Resources
4 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75
Core Natural Resources
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

CNX Resources has a beta of 0.59, suggesting that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Core Natural Resources has a beta of 0.15, suggesting that its stock price is 85% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

CNX Resources beats Core Natural Resources on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Core Natural Resources compare to Warrior Met Coal?

Core Natural Resources (NYSE:CNR) and Warrior Met Coal (NYSE:HCC) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings and media sentiment.

Core Natural Resources pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Warrior Met Coal pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Core Natural Resources pays out -32.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Warrior Met Coal pays out 12.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Warrior Met Coal has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Core Natural Resources is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Warrior Met Coal has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Core Natural Resources. Core Natural Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Warrior Met Coal, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Core Natural Resources$4.23B1.00-$153.22M-$1.22N/A
Warrior Met Coal$1.31B3.31$57M$2.6231.34

86.5% of Core Natural Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.3% of Warrior Met Coal shares are held by institutional investors. 2.5% of Core Natural Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Warrior Met Coal shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Core Natural Resources presently has a consensus price target of $111.67, indicating a potential upside of 33.04%. Warrior Met Coal has a consensus price target of $103.00, indicating a potential upside of 25.44%. Given Core Natural Resources' higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Core Natural Resources is more favorable than Warrior Met Coal.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Core Natural Resources
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Warrior Met Coal
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86

Core Natural Resources has a beta of 0.15, meaning that its stock price is 85% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Warrior Met Coal has a beta of 0.65, meaning that its stock price is 35% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Core Natural Resources had 1 more articles in the media than Warrior Met Coal. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Core Natural Resources and 4 mentions for Warrior Met Coal. Warrior Met Coal's average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat Core Natural Resources' score of 0.72 indicating that Warrior Met Coal is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Core Natural Resources
2 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Warrior Met Coal
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Warrior Met Coal has a net margin of 9.36% compared to Core Natural Resources' net margin of -1.49%. Warrior Met Coal's return on equity of 6.44% beat Core Natural Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Core Natural Resources-1.49% -1.69% -1.02%
Warrior Met Coal 9.36%6.44%5.03%

Summary

Warrior Met Coal beats Core Natural Resources on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Core Natural Resources compare to Hallador Energy?

Hallador Energy (NASDAQ:HNRG) and Core Natural Resources (NYSE:CNR) are both energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, dividends and media sentiment.

Hallador Energy has a net margin of 4.98% compared to Core Natural Resources' net margin of -1.49%. Hallador Energy's return on equity of 14.25% beat Core Natural Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hallador Energy4.98% 14.25% 5.39%
Core Natural Resources -1.49%-1.69%-1.02%

Hallador Energy has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Core Natural Resources. Core Natural Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hallador Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hallador Energy$469.47M1.67$41.87M$0.5331.47
Core Natural Resources$4.23B1.00-$153.22M-$1.22N/A

Hallador Energy has a beta of 0.24, indicating that its stock price is 76% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Core Natural Resources has a beta of 0.15, indicating that its stock price is 85% less volatile than the broader market.

Hallador Energy presently has a consensus price target of $26.63, suggesting a potential upside of 59.62%. Core Natural Resources has a consensus price target of $111.67, suggesting a potential upside of 33.04%. Given Hallador Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Hallador Energy is more favorable than Core Natural Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hallador Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71
Core Natural Resources
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

61.4% of Hallador Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.5% of Core Natural Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 17.4% of Hallador Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.5% of Core Natural Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Hallador Energy had 2 more articles in the media than Core Natural Resources. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Hallador Energy and 5 mentions for Core Natural Resources. Hallador Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.71 beat Core Natural Resources' score of 0.72 indicating that Hallador Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Hallador Energy
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Core Natural Resources
2 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Hallador Energy beats Core Natural Resources on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Core Natural Resources compare to Alliance Resource Partners?

Alliance Resource Partners (NASDAQ:ARLP) and Core Natural Resources (NYSE:CNR) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, dividends, profitability and media sentiment.

Alliance Resource Partners has a net margin of 11.35% compared to Core Natural Resources' net margin of -1.49%. Alliance Resource Partners' return on equity of 16.87% beat Core Natural Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Alliance Resource Partners11.35% 16.87% 10.70%
Core Natural Resources -1.49%-1.69%-1.02%

Alliance Resource Partners presently has a consensus price target of $30.00, suggesting a potential upside of 21.51%. Core Natural Resources has a consensus price target of $111.67, suggesting a potential upside of 33.04%. Given Core Natural Resources' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Core Natural Resources is more favorable than Alliance Resource Partners.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Alliance Resource Partners
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Core Natural Resources
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Alliance Resource Partners has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Core Natural Resources. Core Natural Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Alliance Resource Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Alliance Resource Partners$2.19B1.45$311.16M$1.9012.99
Core Natural Resources$4.23B1.00-$153.22M-$1.22N/A

Alliance Resource Partners has a beta of 0.23, indicating that its stock price is 77% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Core Natural Resources has a beta of 0.15, indicating that its stock price is 85% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Alliance Resource Partners had 1 more articles in the media than Core Natural Resources. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Alliance Resource Partners and 5 mentions for Core Natural Resources. Alliance Resource Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.91 beat Core Natural Resources' score of 0.72 indicating that Alliance Resource Partners is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Alliance Resource Partners
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Core Natural Resources
2 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Alliance Resource Partners pays an annual dividend of $2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.7%. Core Natural Resources pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Alliance Resource Partners pays out 126.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Core Natural Resources pays out -32.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

18.1% of Alliance Resource Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.5% of Core Natural Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 16.8% of Alliance Resource Partners shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.5% of Core Natural Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Alliance Resource Partners beats Core Natural Resources on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Core Natural Resources compare to Peabody Energy?

Core Natural Resources (NYSE:CNR) and Peabody Energy (NYSE:BTU) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation and dividends.

Core Natural Resources has a beta of 0.15, meaning that its share price is 85% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Peabody Energy has a beta of 0.38, meaning that its share price is 62% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Peabody Energy had 34 more articles in the media than Core Natural Resources. MarketBeat recorded 39 mentions for Peabody Energy and 5 mentions for Core Natural Resources. Core Natural Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Peabody Energy's score of 0.10 indicating that Core Natural Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Core Natural Resources
2 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Peabody Energy
6 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
31 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
2 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Core Natural Resources currently has a consensus target price of $111.67, indicating a potential upside of 33.04%. Peabody Energy has a consensus target price of $34.13, indicating a potential upside of 44.27%. Given Peabody Energy's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Peabody Energy is more favorable than Core Natural Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Core Natural Resources
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Peabody Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.17

Core Natural Resources pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Peabody Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Core Natural Resources pays out -32.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Peabody Energy pays out -30.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Peabody Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Peabody Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Peabody Energy has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Core Natural Resources. Core Natural Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Peabody Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Core Natural Resources$4.23B1.00-$153.22M-$1.22N/A
Peabody Energy$3.86B0.75-$52.90M-$0.99N/A

Core Natural Resources has a net margin of -1.49% compared to Peabody Energy's net margin of -3.07%. Core Natural Resources' return on equity of -1.69% beat Peabody Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Core Natural Resources-1.49% -1.69% -1.02%
Peabody Energy -3.07%-2.80%-1.75%

86.5% of Core Natural Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.4% of Peabody Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.5% of Core Natural Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Peabody Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Core Natural Resources beats Peabody Energy on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Core Natural Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CNR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CNR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CNR vs. The Competition

MetricCore Natural ResourcesCOAL IndustryEnergy SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$4.13B$9.29B$9.79B$23.46B
Dividend Yield0.49%3.46%10.72%4.02%
P/E Ratio-68.8010.8119.0531.08
Price / Sales1.001.42634.3419.77
Price / Cash8.929.1836.8318.64
Price / Book1.161.354.134.77
Net Income-$153.22M$638.69M$4.24B$1.06B
7 Day Performance6.10%2.62%1.73%-0.23%
1 Month Performance-8.68%-12.81%-4.38%-0.11%
1 Year Performance11.59%9.90%28.64%16.46%

Core Natural Resources Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CNR
Core Natural Resources
4.3135 of 5 stars
$83.94
+2.5%
$111.67
+33.0%
+10.9%$4.13B$4.23BN/A4,850
CNX
CNX Resources
3.7653 of 5 stars
$33.38
-1.4%
$35.44
+6.2%
-4.7%$4.79B$2.24B4.64470
HCC
Warrior Met Coal
4.8773 of 5 stars
$81.08
+0.3%
$103.00
+27.0%
+54.9%$4.27B$1.31B30.951,485
HNRG
Hallador Energy
4.7828 of 5 stars
$16.48
+1.4%
$26.63
+61.6%
+4.1%$765.87M$469.47M31.09800
ARLP
Alliance Resource Partners
4.4201 of 5 stars
$23.78
-0.1%
$30.00
+26.2%
-9.7%$3.06B$2.19B12.523,575

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:CNR) was last updated on 7/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners