Does the media refer more to HCC or AMR?

In the previous week, Warrior Met Coal had 3 more articles in the media than Alpha Metallurgical Resources. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Warrior Met Coal and 12 mentions for Alpha Metallurgical Resources. Warrior Met Coal's average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat Alpha Metallurgical Resources' score of 0.09 indicating that Warrior Met Coal is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Warrior Met Coal 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 8 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Alpha Metallurgical Resources 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 5 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media favor BTU or HCC?

In the previous week, Peabody Energy had 17 more articles in the media than Warrior Met Coal. MarketBeat recorded 32 mentions for Peabody Energy and 15 mentions for Warrior Met Coal. Warrior Met Coal's average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat Peabody Energy's score of 0.24 indicating that Warrior Met Coal is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Peabody Energy 3 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 27 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Warrior Met Coal 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 8 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts recommend PKX or HCC?

Warrior Met Coal has a consensus price target of $102.60, indicating a potential upside of 7.58%. Given Warrior Met Coal's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Warrior Met Coal is more favorable than POSCO. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score POSCO 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Warrior Met Coal 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 4 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.86

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, PKX or HCC?

POSCO has higher revenue and earnings than Warrior Met Coal. POSCO is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Warrior Met Coal, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio POSCO $48.64B 0.36 $483.48M $2.64 22.11 Warrior Met Coal $1.31B 3.84 $57M $4.16 22.93

Is PKX or HCC more profitable?

Warrior Met Coal has a net margin of 13.05% compared to POSCO's net margin of 1.79%. Warrior Met Coal's return on equity of 10.02% beat POSCO's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets POSCO 1.79% 2.00% 1.19% Warrior Met Coal 13.05% 10.02% 7.84%

Does the media prefer PKX or HCC?

In the previous week, Warrior Met Coal had 8 more articles in the media than POSCO. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Warrior Met Coal and 7 mentions for POSCO. POSCO's average media sentiment score of 0.68 beat Warrior Met Coal's score of 0.34 indicating that POSCO is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment POSCO 3 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Warrior Met Coal 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 8 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, GGB or HCC?

Gerdau has higher revenue and earnings than Warrior Met Coal. Gerdau is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Warrior Met Coal, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Gerdau $12.51B 0.80 $248.41M $0.23 21.61 Warrior Met Coal $1.31B 3.84 $57M $4.16 22.93

Does the media favor GGB or HCC?

In the previous week, Gerdau and Gerdau both had 15 articles in the media. Gerdau's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Warrior Met Coal's score of 0.34 indicating that Gerdau is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Gerdau 7 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Warrior Met Coal 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 8 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has higher valuation and earnings, HCC or TX?

Ternium has higher revenue and earnings than Warrior Met Coal. Ternium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Warrior Met Coal, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Warrior Met Coal $1.31B 3.84 $57M $4.16 22.93 Ternium $15.61B 0.70 $425.23M $3.56 15.37

Does the media refer more to HCC or TX?

In the previous week, Warrior Met Coal had 5 more articles in the media than Ternium. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Warrior Met Coal and 10 mentions for Ternium. Ternium's average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat Warrior Met Coal's score of 0.34 indicating that Ternium is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Warrior Met Coal 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 8 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Ternium 4 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Warrior Met Coal (HCC) Competitors

$95.37 +3.40 (+3.70%)

As of 08/10/2026 03:58 PM Eastern

Compare

HCC vs. AMR, BTU, PKX, GGB, and TX

Should you buy Warrior Met Coal stock or one of its competitors? Warrior Met Coal's main competitors and comparable companies include Alpha Metallurgical Resources (AMR), Peabody Energy (BTU), POSCO (PKX), Gerdau (GGB), and Ternium (TX). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size.

How does Warrior Met Coal compare to Alpha Metallurgical Resources?

Warrior Met Coal (NYSE:HCC) and Alpha Metallurgical Resources (NYSE:AMR) are both materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation and profitability.

Warrior Met Coal has a beta of 0.65, meaning that its stock price is 35% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alpha Metallurgical Resources has a beta of 0.65, meaning that its stock price is 35% less volatile than the broader market.

92.3% of Warrior Met Coal shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.3% of Alpha Metallurgical Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of Warrior Met Coal shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 18.2% of Alpha Metallurgical Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Warrior Met Coal has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Alpha Metallurgical Resources. Alpha Metallurgical Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Warrior Met Coal, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Warrior Met Coal	$1.31B	3.84	$57M	$4.16	22.93
Alpha Metallurgical Resources	$2.13B	0.92	-$61.69M	-$3.58	N/A

In the previous week, Warrior Met Coal had 3 more articles in the media than Alpha Metallurgical Resources. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Warrior Met Coal and 12 mentions for Alpha Metallurgical Resources. Warrior Met Coal's average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat Alpha Metallurgical Resources' score of 0.09 indicating that Warrior Met Coal is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Warrior Met Coal	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	8 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Alpha Metallurgical Resources	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	5 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Warrior Met Coal presently has a consensus target price of $102.60, suggesting a potential upside of 7.58%. Alpha Metallurgical Resources has a consensus target price of $177.00, suggesting a potential upside of 15.20%. Given Alpha Metallurgical Resources' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Alpha Metallurgical Resources is more favorable than Warrior Met Coal.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Warrior Met Coal	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.86
Alpha Metallurgical Resources	1 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.86

Warrior Met Coal has a net margin of 13.05% compared to Alpha Metallurgical Resources' net margin of -2.23%. Warrior Met Coal's return on equity of 10.02% beat Alpha Metallurgical Resources' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Warrior Met Coal	13.05%	10.02%	7.84%
Alpha Metallurgical Resources	-2.23%	-2.99%	-2.01%

Summary

Warrior Met Coal beats Alpha Metallurgical Resources on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Warrior Met Coal compare to Peabody Energy?

Peabody Energy (NYSE:BTU) and Warrior Met Coal (NYSE:HCC) are related mid-cap companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, profitability, risk, dividends, earnings and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Peabody Energy had 17 more articles in the media than Warrior Met Coal. MarketBeat recorded 32 mentions for Peabody Energy and 15 mentions for Warrior Met Coal. Warrior Met Coal's average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat Peabody Energy's score of 0.24 indicating that Warrior Met Coal is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Peabody Energy	3 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	27 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Warrior Met Coal	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	8 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

87.4% of Peabody Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.3% of Warrior Met Coal shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Peabody Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Warrior Met Coal shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Warrior Met Coal has a net margin of 13.05% compared to Peabody Energy's net margin of -4.56%. Warrior Met Coal's return on equity of 10.02% beat Peabody Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Peabody Energy	-4.56%	-5.22%	-3.22%
Warrior Met Coal	13.05%	10.02%	7.84%

Peabody Energy has a beta of 0.34, suggesting that its stock price is 66% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Warrior Met Coal has a beta of 0.65, suggesting that its stock price is 35% less volatile than the broader market.

Peabody Energy presently has a consensus price target of $33.88, indicating a potential upside of 37.48%. Warrior Met Coal has a consensus price target of $102.60, indicating a potential upside of 7.58%. Given Peabody Energy's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Peabody Energy is more favorable than Warrior Met Coal.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Peabody Energy	2 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Warrior Met Coal	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.86

Peabody Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Warrior Met Coal pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Peabody Energy pays out -20.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Warrior Met Coal pays out 7.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Peabody Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Warrior Met Coal has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Peabody Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Warrior Met Coal has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Peabody Energy. Peabody Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Warrior Met Coal, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Peabody Energy	$3.86B	0.78	-$52.90M	-$1.50	N/A
Warrior Met Coal	$1.31B	3.84	$57M	$4.16	22.93

Summary

Warrior Met Coal beats Peabody Energy on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Warrior Met Coal compare to POSCO?

POSCO (NYSE:PKX) and Warrior Met Coal (NYSE:HCC) are both materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Warrior Met Coal has a net margin of 13.05% compared to POSCO's net margin of 1.79%. Warrior Met Coal's return on equity of 10.02% beat POSCO's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
POSCO	1.79%	2.00%	1.19%
Warrior Met Coal	13.05%	10.02%	7.84%

92.3% of Warrior Met Coal shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of POSCO shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Warrior Met Coal shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

POSCO has a beta of 1.56, suggesting that its stock price is 56% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Warrior Met Coal has a beta of 0.65, suggesting that its stock price is 35% less volatile than the broader market.

POSCO pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Warrior Met Coal pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. POSCO pays out 37.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Warrior Met Coal pays out 7.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Warrior Met Coal has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Warrior Met Coal had 8 more articles in the media than POSCO. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Warrior Met Coal and 7 mentions for POSCO. POSCO's average media sentiment score of 0.68 beat Warrior Met Coal's score of 0.34 indicating that POSCO is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
POSCO	3 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Warrior Met Coal	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	8 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Warrior Met Coal has a consensus price target of $102.60, indicating a potential upside of 7.58%. Given Warrior Met Coal's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Warrior Met Coal is more favorable than POSCO.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
POSCO	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Warrior Met Coal	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.86

POSCO has higher revenue and earnings than Warrior Met Coal. POSCO is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Warrior Met Coal, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
POSCO	$48.64B	0.36	$483.48M	$2.64	22.11
Warrior Met Coal	$1.31B	3.84	$57M	$4.16	22.93

Summary

Warrior Met Coal beats POSCO on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Warrior Met Coal compare to Gerdau?

Gerdau (NYSE:GGB) and Warrior Met Coal (NYSE:HCC) are both mid-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk and earnings.

Gerdau has higher revenue and earnings than Warrior Met Coal. Gerdau is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Warrior Met Coal, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Gerdau	$12.51B	0.80	$248.41M	$0.23	21.61
Warrior Met Coal	$1.31B	3.84	$57M	$4.16	22.93

Warrior Met Coal has a net margin of 13.05% compared to Gerdau's net margin of 3.37%. Warrior Met Coal's return on equity of 10.02% beat Gerdau's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Gerdau	3.37%	7.97%	5.18%
Warrior Met Coal	13.05%	10.02%	7.84%

Gerdau currently has a consensus target price of $5.28, suggesting a potential upside of 6.30%. Warrior Met Coal has a consensus target price of $102.60, suggesting a potential upside of 7.58%. Given Warrior Met Coal's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Warrior Met Coal is more favorable than Gerdau.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Gerdau	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Warrior Met Coal	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.86

Gerdau has a beta of 1.48, meaning that its stock price is 48% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Warrior Met Coal has a beta of 0.65, meaning that its stock price is 35% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Gerdau and Gerdau both had 15 articles in the media. Gerdau's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Warrior Met Coal's score of 0.34 indicating that Gerdau is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Gerdau	7 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Warrior Met Coal	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	8 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

1.5% of Gerdau shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.3% of Warrior Met Coal shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of Gerdau shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Warrior Met Coal shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Gerdau pays an annual dividend of $0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Warrior Met Coal pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Gerdau pays out 52.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Warrior Met Coal pays out 7.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Warrior Met Coal has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Summary

Warrior Met Coal beats Gerdau on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Warrior Met Coal compare to Ternium?

Warrior Met Coal (NYSE:HCC) and Ternium (NYSE:TX) are both materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, dividends, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation and institutional ownership.

Warrior Met Coal has a net margin of 13.05% compared to Ternium's net margin of 4.37%. Warrior Met Coal's return on equity of 10.02% beat Ternium's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Warrior Met Coal	13.05%	10.02%	7.84%
Ternium	4.37%	4.26%	2.92%

Warrior Met Coal pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Ternium pays an annual dividend of $2.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Warrior Met Coal pays out 7.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ternium pays out 73.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Warrior Met Coal has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Warrior Met Coal has a beta of 0.65, suggesting that its stock price is 35% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ternium has a beta of 1.25, suggesting that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the broader market.

92.3% of Warrior Met Coal shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.0% of Ternium shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of Warrior Met Coal shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Ternium shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Ternium has higher revenue and earnings than Warrior Met Coal. Ternium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Warrior Met Coal, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Warrior Met Coal	$1.31B	3.84	$57M	$4.16	22.93
Ternium	$15.61B	0.70	$425.23M	$3.56	15.37

In the previous week, Warrior Met Coal had 5 more articles in the media than Ternium. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Warrior Met Coal and 10 mentions for Ternium. Ternium's average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat Warrior Met Coal's score of 0.34 indicating that Ternium is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Warrior Met Coal	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	8 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Ternium	4 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Warrior Met Coal currently has a consensus price target of $102.60, suggesting a potential upside of 7.58%. Ternium has a consensus price target of $47.94, suggesting a potential downside of 12.37%. Given Warrior Met Coal's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Warrior Met Coal is more favorable than Ternium.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Warrior Met Coal	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.86
Ternium	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.73

Summary

Warrior Met Coal beats Ternium on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Warrior Met Coal News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding HCC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

HCC vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Warrior Met Coal	Metals & Mining Industry	Materials Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$4.86B	$3.85B	$4.90B	$24.19B
Dividend Yield	0.35%	5.22%	4.70%	3.69%
P/E Ratio	22.93	23.34	21.35	29.01
Price / Sales	3.84	8,664.62	5,144.32	20.31
Price / Cash	19.42	26.52	24.63	19.37
Price / Book	2.34	10.50	8.88	4.91
Net Income	$57M	$122.29M	$154.60M	$1.06B
7 Day Performance	16.84%	7.19%	5.65%	0.05%
1 Month Performance	19.06%	6.90%	5.93%	2.29%
1 Year Performance	58.13%	55.60%	44.46%	20.30%

Warrior Met Coal Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
HCC Warrior Met Coal	3.2892 of 5 stars	$95.37 +3.7%	$102.60 +7.6%	+57.1%	$4.86B	$1.31B	22.93	1,485	Earnings Report Analyst Upgrade
AMR Alpha Metallurgical Resources	4.0992 of 5 stars	$138.51 +1.0%	$177.00 +27.8%	+2.4%	$1.74B	$2.13B	N/A	3,960	Earnings Report Analyst Downgrade
BTU Peabody Energy	4.351 of 5 stars	$21.74 +2.0%	$34.88 +60.4%	+43.0%	$2.60B	$3.86B	N/A	5,400	Trending News
PKX POSCO	3.5238 of 5 stars	$52.89 -0.5%	N/A	+8.8%	$16.08B	$69.43T	20.04	42,873
GGB Gerdau	3.859 of 5 stars	$5.07 +2.1%	$5.28 +4.3%	+65.7%	$9.92B	$12.51B	31.66	25,817	Earnings Report Dividend Increase Analyst Downgrade

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:HCC) was last updated on 8/11/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Warrior Met Coal (HCC) Competitors

HCC vs. AMR, BTU, PKX, GGB, and TX

How does Warrior Met Coal compare to Alpha Metallurgical Resources?

Summary

How does Warrior Met Coal compare to Peabody Energy?

Summary

How does Warrior Met Coal compare to POSCO?

Summary

How does Warrior Met Coal compare to Gerdau?

Summary

How does Warrior Met Coal compare to Ternium?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

HCC vs. The Competition

Warrior Met Coal Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Warrior Met Coal (HCC) Competitors

HCC vs. AMR, BTU, PKX, GGB, and TX

How does Warrior Met Coal compare to Alpha Metallurgical Resources?

Which has more volatility & risk, HCC or AMR?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of HCC or AMR?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, HCC or AMR?

Does the media refer more to HCC or AMR?

Do analysts recommend HCC or AMR?

Is HCC or AMR more profitable?

Summary

How does Warrior Met Coal compare to Peabody Energy?

Does the media favor BTU or HCC?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of BTU or HCC?

Is BTU or HCC more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, BTU or HCC?

Do analysts prefer BTU or HCC?

Is BTU or HCC a better dividend stock?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, BTU or HCC?

Summary

How does Warrior Met Coal compare to POSCO?

Is PKX or HCC more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in PKX or HCC?

Which has more risk and volatility, PKX or HCC?

Is PKX or HCC a better dividend stock?

Does the media prefer PKX or HCC?

Do analysts recommend PKX or HCC?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, PKX or HCC?

Summary

How does Warrior Met Coal compare to Gerdau?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, GGB or HCC?

Is GGB or HCC more profitable?

Do analysts recommend GGB or HCC?

Which has more risk & volatility, GGB or HCC?

Does the media favor GGB or HCC?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in GGB or HCC?

Is GGB or HCC a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Warrior Met Coal compare to Ternium?

Is HCC or TX more profitable?

Is HCC or TX a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk and volatility, HCC or TX?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in HCC or TX?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, HCC or TX?

Does the media refer more to HCC or TX?

Do analysts rate HCC or TX?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

HCC vs. The Competition

Warrior Met Coal Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools