S&P 500   3,811.15
DOW   30,932.37
QQQ   314.14
S&P 500   3,811.15
DOW   30,932.37
QQQ   314.14
S&P 500   3,811.15
DOW   30,932.37
QQQ   314.14
S&P 500   3,811.15
DOW   30,932.37
QQQ   314.14
Log in
NYSE:HCC

Warrior Met Coal Competitors

$19.17
-0.63 (-3.18 %)
(As of 02/26/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$19.15
Now: $19.17
$20.17
50-Day Range
$19.85
MA: $22.70
$25.63
52-Week Range
$9.46
Now: $19.17
$25.90
Volume1.22 million shs
Average Volume746,271 shs
Market Capitalization$981.24 million
P/E Ratio51.81
Dividend Yield1.01%
Beta1.25

Competitors

Warrior Met Coal (NYSE:HCC) Vs. UGP, FTI, PDCE, MUSA, ETRN, and HP

Should you be buying HCC stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sector of "oils/energy" are considered alternatives and competitors to Warrior Met Coal, including Ultrapar Participações (UGP), TechnipFMC (FTI), PDC Energy (PDCE), Murphy USA (MUSA), Equitrans Midstream (ETRN), and Helmerich & Payne (HP).

Ultrapar Participações (NYSE:UGP) and Warrior Met Coal (NYSE:HCC) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

3.4% of Ultrapar Participações shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.2% of Warrior Met Coal shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Warrior Met Coal shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Ultrapar Participações and Warrior Met Coal's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ultrapar Participações$21.70 billion0.18$94.65 million$0.1523.27
Warrior Met Coal$1.27 billion0.77$301.70 million$5.523.47

Warrior Met Coal has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Ultrapar Participações. Warrior Met Coal is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ultrapar Participações, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Ultrapar Participações pays an annual dividend of $0.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Warrior Met Coal pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Ultrapar Participações pays out 33.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Warrior Met Coal pays out 3.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Warrior Met Coal has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Ultrapar Participações and Warrior Met Coal, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Ultrapar Participações02402.67
Warrior Met Coal05302.38

Ultrapar Participações currently has a consensus price target of $4.60, suggesting a potential upside of 31.81%. Warrior Met Coal has a consensus price target of $22.1667, suggesting a potential upside of 15.63%. Given Ultrapar Participações' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Ultrapar Participações is more favorable than Warrior Met Coal.

Profitability

This table compares Ultrapar Participações and Warrior Met Coal's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Ultrapar Participações0.18%1.48%0.43%
Warrior Met Coal2.41%1.04%0.58%

Volatility & Risk

Ultrapar Participações has a beta of 1.35, indicating that its share price is 35% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Warrior Met Coal has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its share price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Warrior Met Coal beats Ultrapar Participações on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Warrior Met Coal (NYSE:HCC) and TechnipFMC (NYSE:FTI) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, valuation, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

98.2% of Warrior Met Coal shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.5% of TechnipFMC shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Warrior Met Coal shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of TechnipFMC shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Warrior Met Coal and TechnipFMC's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Warrior Met Coal$1.27 billion0.77$301.70 million$5.523.47
TechnipFMC$13.41 billion0.27$-2,415,200,000.00$0.7411.11

Warrior Met Coal has higher earnings, but lower revenue than TechnipFMC. Warrior Met Coal is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TechnipFMC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Warrior Met Coal and TechnipFMC, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Warrior Met Coal05302.38
TechnipFMC091002.53

Warrior Met Coal presently has a consensus price target of $22.1667, suggesting a potential upside of 15.63%. TechnipFMC has a consensus price target of $10.4179, suggesting a potential upside of 26.74%. Given TechnipFMC's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe TechnipFMC is more favorable than Warrior Met Coal.

Profitability

This table compares Warrior Met Coal and TechnipFMC's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Warrior Met Coal2.41%1.04%0.58%
TechnipFMC-42.41%1.56%0.38%

Risk & Volatility

Warrior Met Coal has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its share price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, TechnipFMC has a beta of 2.38, indicating that its share price is 138% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Warrior Met Coal (NYSE:HCC) and PDC Energy (NASDAQ:PDCE) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, valuation, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

98.2% of Warrior Met Coal shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Warrior Met Coal shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of PDC Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Warrior Met Coal and PDC Energy's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Warrior Met Coal$1.27 billion0.77$301.70 million$5.523.47
PDC Energy$1.16 billion3.01$-56,670,000.00$0.8342.11

Warrior Met Coal has higher revenue and earnings than PDC Energy. Warrior Met Coal is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PDC Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Warrior Met Coal and PDC Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Warrior Met Coal05302.38
PDC Energy011402.93

Warrior Met Coal presently has a consensus price target of $22.1667, suggesting a potential upside of 15.63%. PDC Energy has a consensus price target of $26.0667, suggesting a potential downside of 25.42%. Given Warrior Met Coal's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Warrior Met Coal is more favorable than PDC Energy.

Profitability

This table compares Warrior Met Coal and PDC Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Warrior Met Coal2.41%1.04%0.58%
PDC Energy-55.72%2.42%1.20%

Risk & Volatility

Warrior Met Coal has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its share price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, PDC Energy has a beta of 3.28, indicating that its share price is 228% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Warrior Met Coal (NYSE:HCC) and Murphy USA (NYSE:MUSA) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, valuation, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

98.2% of Warrior Met Coal shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.2% of Murphy USA shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Warrior Met Coal shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 7.1% of Murphy USA shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Warrior Met Coal and Murphy USA's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Warrior Met Coal$1.27 billion0.77$301.70 million$5.523.47
Murphy USA$14.03 billion0.24$154.80 million$5.2323.83

Warrior Met Coal has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Murphy USA. Warrior Met Coal is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Murphy USA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Warrior Met Coal pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Murphy USA pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Warrior Met Coal pays out 3.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Murphy USA pays out 19.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Warrior Met Coal has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Murphy USA has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Warrior Met Coal is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Warrior Met Coal and Murphy USA, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Warrior Met Coal05302.38
Murphy USA10001.00

Warrior Met Coal presently has a consensus price target of $22.1667, suggesting a potential upside of 15.63%. Murphy USA has a consensus price target of $142.00, suggesting a potential upside of 13.92%. Given Warrior Met Coal's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Warrior Met Coal is more favorable than Murphy USA.

Profitability

This table compares Warrior Met Coal and Murphy USA's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Warrior Met Coal2.41%1.04%0.58%
Murphy USA3.14%45.51%14.02%

Volatility and Risk

Warrior Met Coal has a beta of 1.25, suggesting that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Murphy USA has a beta of 0.99, suggesting that its stock price is 1% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Warrior Met Coal beats Murphy USA on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Warrior Met Coal (NYSE:HCC) and Equitrans Midstream (NYSE:ETRN) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, valuation, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

98.2% of Warrior Met Coal shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.9% of Equitrans Midstream shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Warrior Met Coal shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Equitrans Midstream shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Warrior Met Coal and Equitrans Midstream, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Warrior Met Coal05302.38
Equitrans Midstream23302.13

Warrior Met Coal presently has a consensus price target of $22.1667, suggesting a potential upside of 15.63%. Equitrans Midstream has a consensus price target of $10.1429, suggesting a potential upside of 40.29%. Given Equitrans Midstream's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Equitrans Midstream is more favorable than Warrior Met Coal.

Profitability

This table compares Warrior Met Coal and Equitrans Midstream's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Warrior Met Coal2.41%1.04%0.58%
Equitrans Midstream1.40%15.27%5.43%

Volatility and Risk

Warrior Met Coal has a beta of 1.25, suggesting that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Equitrans Midstream has a beta of 2.23, suggesting that its stock price is 123% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Warrior Met Coal pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Equitrans Midstream pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.3%. Warrior Met Coal pays out 3.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Equitrans Midstream pays out 20.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Warrior Met Coal has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Equitrans Midstream has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Warrior Met Coal and Equitrans Midstream's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Warrior Met Coal$1.27 billion0.77$301.70 million$5.523.47
Equitrans Midstream$1.63 billion1.92$-203,740,000.00$3.002.41

Warrior Met Coal has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Equitrans Midstream. Equitrans Midstream is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Warrior Met Coal, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Equitrans Midstream beats Warrior Met Coal on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Helmerich & Payne (NYSE:HP) and Warrior Met Coal (NYSE:HCC) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

88.1% of Helmerich & Payne shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.2% of Warrior Met Coal shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.5% of Helmerich & Payne shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Warrior Met Coal shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Helmerich & Payne and Warrior Met Coal, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Helmerich & Payne68902.13
Warrior Met Coal05302.38

Helmerich & Payne presently has a consensus target price of $21.6842, suggesting a potential downside of 24.52%. Warrior Met Coal has a consensus target price of $22.1667, suggesting a potential upside of 15.63%. Given Warrior Met Coal's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Warrior Met Coal is more favorable than Helmerich & Payne.

Profitability

This table compares Helmerich & Payne and Warrior Met Coal's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Helmerich & Payne-27.88%-2.80%-1.90%
Warrior Met Coal2.41%1.04%0.58%

Volatility and Risk

Helmerich & Payne has a beta of 2.25, indicating that its stock price is 125% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Warrior Met Coal has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Helmerich & Payne pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Warrior Met Coal pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Helmerich & Payne pays out -116.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Warrior Met Coal pays out 3.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Helmerich & Payne has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Warrior Met Coal has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Helmerich & Payne is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Helmerich & Payne and Warrior Met Coal's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Helmerich & Payne$1.77 billion1.75$-494,500,000.00($0.86)-33.41
Warrior Met Coal$1.27 billion0.77$301.70 million$5.523.47

Warrior Met Coal has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Helmerich & Payne. Helmerich & Payne is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Warrior Met Coal, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Warrior Met Coal beats Helmerich & Payne on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.


Warrior Met Coal Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Ultrapar Participações logo
UGP
Ultrapar Participações
2.1$3.49-2.9%$3.88 billion$21.70 billion116.33Upcoming Earnings
Dividend Announcement
Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Gap Down
TechnipFMC logo
FTI
TechnipFMC
2.4$8.22-3.4%$3.68 billion$13.41 billion-0.65Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
Increase in Short Interest
Gap Down
PDC Energy logo
PDCE
PDC Energy
2.0$34.95-2.5%$3.48 billion$1.16 billion-4.47Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Murphy USA logo
MUSA
Murphy USA
1.7$124.65-0.2%$3.40 billion$14.03 billion10.00
Equitrans Midstream logo
ETRN
Equitrans Midstream
1.9$7.23-3.6%$3.13 billion$1.63 billion-22.59Earnings Announcement
Gap Down
Helmerich & Payne logo
HP
Helmerich & Payne
1.6$28.73-0.8%$3.10 billion$1.77 billion-6.26
Renewable Energy Group logo
REGI
Renewable Energy Group
1.8$77.77-10.5%$3.06 billion$2.64 billion5.62Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
High Trading Volume
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Gap Down
Sunoco logo
SUN
Sunoco
1.7$30.60-2.3%$3.04 billion$16.60 billion19.49Analyst Upgrade
Gap Down
Magnolia Oil & Gas logo
MGY
Magnolia Oil & Gas
1.2$12.06-1.1%$3.03 billion$936.14 million-1.64Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
Unusual Options Activity
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Enable Midstream Partners logo
ENBL
Enable Midstream Partners
1.7$6.62-3.8%$2.88 billion$2.96 billion-60.18Earnings Announcement
Analyst Upgrade
High Trading Volume
Gap Down
Canadian Solar logo
CSIQ
Canadian Solar
1.8$46.93-2.8%$2.79 billion$3.20 billion13.60News Coverage
Gap Up
CNX Resources logo
CNX
CNX Resources
2.0$12.61-4.2%$2.77 billion$1.92 billion-2.51News Coverage
Gap Down
Ameresco logo
AMRC
Ameresco
1.6$57.12-1.7%$2.73 billion$866.93 million52.40Upcoming Earnings
Antero Resources logo
AR
Antero Resources
1.6$9.00-2.8%$2.71 billion$4.41 billion-1.38Gap Down
Murphy Oil logo
MUR
Murphy Oil
1.7$16.33-2.0%$2.51 billion$2.83 billion-2.39News Coverage
Viper Energy Partners logo
VNOM
Viper Energy Partners
1.1$15.68-3.3%$2.49 billion$298.28 million-6.53Earnings Announcement
Dividend Increase
Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Gap Down
Range Resources logo
RRC
Range Resources
1.3$9.64-6.3%$2.47 billion$2.83 billion-0.95Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Gap Down
Southwestern Energy logo
SWN
Southwestern Energy
1.5$4.05-4.0%$2.45 billion$3.04 billion-0.76Earnings Announcement
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Matador Resources logo
MTDR
Matador Resources
2.0$20.89-3.5%$2.44 billion$983.67 million-5.06Earnings Announcement
Dividend Announcement
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Gap Up
Cactus logo
WHD
Cactus
1.3$31.87-2.6%$2.40 billion$628.41 million24.52Earnings Announcement
News Coverage
Gap Down
JinkoSolar logo
JKS
JinkoSolar
0.9$51.34-2.7%$2.26 billion$4.27 billion37.75
CVR Energy logo
CVI
CVR Energy
1.0$22.08-4.1%$2.22 billion$6.36 billion-15.33Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
Gap Down
Transocean logo
RIG
Transocean
0.8$3.47-1.7%$2.13 billion$3.09 billion-3.40Earnings Announcement
Analyst Revision
Enviva Partners logo
EVA
Enviva Partners
1.9$53.03-1.7%$2.11 billion$684.39 million-279.11Analyst Report
High Trading Volume
Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
TC PipeLines logo
TCP
TC PipeLines
2.3$29.12-2.7%$2.08 billion$403 million7.58Earnings Announcement
News Coverage
Gap Down
Black Stone Minerals logo
BSM
Black Stone Minerals
1.7$8.93-4.4%$1.98 billion$487.82 million16.85Earnings Announcement
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Gap Down
World Fuel Services logo
INT
World Fuel Services
2.1$31.08-12.7%$1.97 billion$36.82 billion11.86Earnings Announcement
Analyst Downgrade
Insider Selling
High Trading Volume
News Coverage
NuStar Energy logo
NS
NuStar Energy
1.6$17.90-1.7%$1.95 billion$1.50 billion-7.34Increase in Short Interest
Crescent Point Energy logo
CPG
Crescent Point Energy
1.8$3.66-4.4%$1.94 billion$2.51 billion-0.79Earnings Announcement
Analyst Upgrade
News Coverage
EnLink Midstream logo
ENLC
EnLink Midstream
1.0$3.85-9.6%$1.89 billion$6.05 billion-1.56High Trading Volume
Gap Down
Covanta logo
CVA
Covanta
1.4$14.05-1.6%$1.85 billion$1.87 billion-66.90Analyst Downgrade
Analyst Revision
Holly Energy Partners logo
HEP
Holly Energy Partners
1.7$17.23-0.6%$1.82 billion$532.78 million10.97Earnings Announcement
High Trading Volume
Increase in Short Interest
Delek US logo
DK
Delek US
1.3$24.56-3.6%$1.81 billion$9.30 billion-6.36Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
News Coverage
PBF Energy logo
PBF
PBF Energy
1.5$14.20-4.6%$1.71 billion$24.51 billion-1.62Analyst Report
Increase in Short Interest
Gap Down
YPF Sociedad Anónima logo
YPF
YPF Sociedad Anónima
0.9$4.33-1.2%$1.70 billion$11.45 billion-1.07Upcoming Earnings
Rattler Midstream logo
RTLR
Rattler Midstream
1.8$11.00-1.1%$1.67 billion$447.67 million13.75Earnings Announcement
Dividend Announcement
Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Plains GP logo
PAGP
Plains GP
2.2$8.62-5.0%$1.62 billion$33.67 billion-3.15Unusual Options Activity
Gap Down
Crestwood Equity Partners logo
CEQP
Crestwood Equity Partners
1.8$21.95-1.4%$1.61 billion$3.18 billion-16.38Earnings Announcement
Analyst Upgrade
Insider Selling
News Coverage
Gap Down
SM Energy logo
SM
SM Energy
1.4$13.86-0.3%$1.59 billion$1.59 billion-2.24
Core Laboratories logo
CLB
Core Laboratories
1.5$35.54-2.1%$1.58 billion$668.21 million-15.66
Archrock logo
AROC
Archrock
1.4$10.31-0.0%$1.58 billion$965.48 million-54.26Earnings Announcement
Gevo logo
GEVO
Gevo
1.3$9.71-3.3%$1.50 billion$24.49 million-5.96Analyst Report
News Coverage
Gap Down
Azure Power Global logo
AZRE
Azure Power Global
1.3$30.32-0.2%$1.46 billion$171.90 million-48.13
Patterson-UTI Energy logo
PTEN
Patterson-UTI Energy
1.2$7.40-1.4%$1.39 billion$2.47 billion-1.79Unusual Options Activity
News Coverage
RPC logo
RES
RPC
1.2$6.35-0.6%$1.37 billion$1.22 billion-5.93
USA Compression Partners logo
USAC
USA Compression Partners
1.3$13.98-4.0%$1.36 billion$698.36 million-2.13News Coverage
Gap Down
Comstock Resources logo
CRK
Comstock Resources
1.4$5.71-1.8%$1.33 billion$768.69 million-10.98
Liberty Oilfield Services logo
LBRT
Liberty Oilfield Services
1.1$11.69-1.2%$1.32 billion$1.99 billion-10.72Analyst Upgrade
Insider Selling
Decrease in Short Interest
Whiting Petroleum logo
WLL
Whiting Petroleum
1.0$34.30-1.0%$1.31 billionN/A0.00Earnings Announcement
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Noble Midstream Partners logo
NBLX
Noble Midstream Partners
1.6$14.00-0.9%$1.26 billion$703.80 million8.28Analyst Report
High Trading Volume
Decrease in Short Interest
This page was last updated on 2/28/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.