Does the media refer more to AMR or HCC?

In the previous week, Alpha Metallurgical Resources had 2 more articles in the media than Warrior Met Coal. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Alpha Metallurgical Resources and 14 mentions for Warrior Met Coal. Alpha Metallurgical Resources' average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat Warrior Met Coal's score of 1.17 indicating that Alpha Metallurgical Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Alpha Metallurgical Resources 13 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Warrior Met Coal 11 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer HCC or BTU?

In the previous week, Warrior Met Coal and Warrior Met Coal both had 14 articles in the media. Warrior Met Coal's average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat Peabody Energy's score of 0.98 indicating that Warrior Met Coal is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Warrior Met Coal 11 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Peabody Energy 12 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts recommend PKX or HCC?

Warrior Met Coal has a consensus target price of $102.60, indicating a potential downside of 5.15%. Given Warrior Met Coal's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Warrior Met Coal is more favorable than POSCO. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score POSCO 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.67 Warrior Met Coal 0 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 4 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.57

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, PKX or HCC?

POSCO has higher revenue and earnings than Warrior Met Coal. POSCO is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Warrior Met Coal, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio POSCO $69.43T 0.00 $483.48M $2.64 23.22 Warrior Met Coal $1.31B 4.36 $57M $4.16 26.00

Is PKX or HCC more profitable?

Warrior Met Coal has a net margin of 13.05% compared to POSCO's net margin of 1.79%. Warrior Met Coal's return on equity of 10.02% beat POSCO's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets POSCO 1.79% 2.00% 1.19% Warrior Met Coal 13.05% 10.02% 7.84%

Does the media refer more to PKX or HCC?

In the previous week, Warrior Met Coal had 6 more articles in the media than POSCO. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Warrior Met Coal and 8 mentions for POSCO. Warrior Met Coal's average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat POSCO's score of 0.11 indicating that Warrior Met Coal is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment POSCO 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Warrior Met Coal 11 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has better earnings and valuation, TX or HCC?

Ternium has higher revenue and earnings than Warrior Met Coal. Ternium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Warrior Met Coal, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Ternium $15.61B 0.70 $425.23M $3.56 15.35 Warrior Met Coal $1.31B 4.36 $57M $4.16 26.00

Does the media refer more to TX or HCC?

In the previous week, Warrior Met Coal had 12 more articles in the media than Ternium. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Warrior Met Coal and 2 mentions for Ternium. Warrior Met Coal's average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat Ternium's score of 0.67 indicating that Warrior Met Coal is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Ternium 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Warrior Met Coal 11 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, GGB or HCC?

Gerdau has higher revenue and earnings than Warrior Met Coal. Gerdau is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Warrior Met Coal, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Gerdau $12.51B 0.73 $248.41M $0.23 20.20 Warrior Met Coal $1.31B 4.36 $57M $4.16 26.00

Does the media favor GGB or HCC?

In the previous week, Warrior Met Coal had 12 more articles in the media than Gerdau. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Warrior Met Coal and 2 mentions for Gerdau. Warrior Met Coal's average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat Gerdau's score of 0.78 indicating that Warrior Met Coal is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Gerdau 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Warrior Met Coal 11 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Warrior Met Coal (HCC) Competitors

$108.17 +1.10 (+1.03%)

As of 11:18 AM Eastern

Compare

HCC vs. AMR, BTU, PKX, TX, and GGB

Should you buy Warrior Met Coal stock or one of its competitors? Warrior Met Coal's main competitors and comparable companies include Alpha Metallurgical Resources (AMR), Peabody Energy (BTU), POSCO (PKX), Ternium (TX), and Gerdau (GGB). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size.

How does Warrior Met Coal compare to Alpha Metallurgical Resources?

Alpha Metallurgical Resources (NYSE:AMR) and Warrior Met Coal (NYSE:HCC) are both mid-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Alpha Metallurgical Resources presently has a consensus target price of $176.00, suggesting a potential downside of 24.78%. Warrior Met Coal has a consensus target price of $102.60, suggesting a potential downside of 5.15%. Given Warrior Met Coal's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Warrior Met Coal is more favorable than Alpha Metallurgical Resources.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Alpha Metallurgical Resources	2 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.71
Warrior Met Coal	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.57

Warrior Met Coal has a net margin of 13.05% compared to Alpha Metallurgical Resources' net margin of -2.23%. Warrior Met Coal's return on equity of 10.02% beat Alpha Metallurgical Resources' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Alpha Metallurgical Resources	-2.23%	-2.99%	-2.01%
Warrior Met Coal	13.05%	10.02%	7.84%

In the previous week, Alpha Metallurgical Resources had 2 more articles in the media than Warrior Met Coal. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Alpha Metallurgical Resources and 14 mentions for Warrior Met Coal. Alpha Metallurgical Resources' average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat Warrior Met Coal's score of 1.17 indicating that Alpha Metallurgical Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Alpha Metallurgical Resources	13 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Warrior Met Coal	11 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Warrior Met Coal has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Alpha Metallurgical Resources. Alpha Metallurgical Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Warrior Met Coal, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Alpha Metallurgical Resources	$2.13B	1.39	-$61.69M	-$3.58	N/A
Warrior Met Coal	$1.31B	4.36	$57M	$4.16	26.00

84.3% of Alpha Metallurgical Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.3% of Warrior Met Coal shares are held by institutional investors. 18.2% of Alpha Metallurgical Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Warrior Met Coal shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Alpha Metallurgical Resources has a beta of 0.65, meaning that its stock price is 35% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Warrior Met Coal has a beta of 0.65, meaning that its stock price is 35% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Warrior Met Coal beats Alpha Metallurgical Resources on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Warrior Met Coal compare to Peabody Energy?

Warrior Met Coal (NYSE:HCC) and Peabody Energy (NYSE:BTU) are related mid-cap companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and earnings.

Warrior Met Coal has a net margin of 13.05% compared to Peabody Energy's net margin of -4.56%. Warrior Met Coal's return on equity of 10.02% beat Peabody Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Warrior Met Coal	13.05%	10.02%	7.84%
Peabody Energy	-4.56%	-5.22%	-3.22%

92.3% of Warrior Met Coal shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.4% of Peabody Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of Warrior Met Coal shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Peabody Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Warrior Met Coal pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Peabody Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Warrior Met Coal pays out 7.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Peabody Energy pays out -20.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Warrior Met Coal has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Peabody Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Peabody Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Warrior Met Coal has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Peabody Energy. Peabody Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Warrior Met Coal, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Warrior Met Coal	$1.31B	4.36	$57M	$4.16	26.00
Peabody Energy	$3.86B	0.93	-$52.90M	-$1.50	N/A

Warrior Met Coal presently has a consensus target price of $102.60, suggesting a potential downside of 5.15%. Peabody Energy has a consensus target price of $33.88, suggesting a potential upside of 15.39%. Given Peabody Energy's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Peabody Energy is more favorable than Warrior Met Coal.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Warrior Met Coal	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.57
Peabody Energy	2 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

In the previous week, Warrior Met Coal and Warrior Met Coal both had 14 articles in the media. Warrior Met Coal's average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat Peabody Energy's score of 0.98 indicating that Warrior Met Coal is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Warrior Met Coal	11 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Peabody Energy	12 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Warrior Met Coal has a beta of 0.65, indicating that its share price is 35% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Peabody Energy has a beta of 0.34, indicating that its share price is 66% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Warrior Met Coal beats Peabody Energy on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Warrior Met Coal compare to POSCO?

POSCO (NYSE:PKX) and Warrior Met Coal (NYSE:HCC) are both materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends and earnings.

92.3% of Warrior Met Coal shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of POSCO shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Warrior Met Coal shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Warrior Met Coal had 6 more articles in the media than POSCO. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Warrior Met Coal and 8 mentions for POSCO. Warrior Met Coal's average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat POSCO's score of 0.11 indicating that Warrior Met Coal is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
POSCO	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Warrior Met Coal	11 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

POSCO has a beta of 1.56, meaning that its stock price is 56% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Warrior Met Coal has a beta of 0.65, meaning that its stock price is 35% less volatile than the broader market.

POSCO pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Warrior Met Coal pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. POSCO pays out 37.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Warrior Met Coal pays out 7.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Warrior Met Coal has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Warrior Met Coal has a net margin of 13.05% compared to POSCO's net margin of 1.79%. Warrior Met Coal's return on equity of 10.02% beat POSCO's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
POSCO	1.79%	2.00%	1.19%
Warrior Met Coal	13.05%	10.02%	7.84%

Warrior Met Coal has a consensus target price of $102.60, indicating a potential downside of 5.15%. Given Warrior Met Coal's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Warrior Met Coal is more favorable than POSCO.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
POSCO	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Warrior Met Coal	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.57

POSCO has higher revenue and earnings than Warrior Met Coal. POSCO is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Warrior Met Coal, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
POSCO	$69.43T	0.00	$483.48M	$2.64	23.22
Warrior Met Coal	$1.31B	4.36	$57M	$4.16	26.00

Summary

Warrior Met Coal beats POSCO on 14 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Warrior Met Coal compare to Ternium?

Ternium (NYSE:TX) and Warrior Met Coal (NYSE:HCC) are both materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Warrior Met Coal has a net margin of 13.05% compared to Ternium's net margin of 4.37%. Warrior Met Coal's return on equity of 10.02% beat Ternium's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ternium	4.37%	4.26%	2.92%
Warrior Met Coal	13.05%	10.02%	7.84%

Ternium has higher revenue and earnings than Warrior Met Coal. Ternium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Warrior Met Coal, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ternium	$15.61B	0.70	$425.23M	$3.56	15.35
Warrior Met Coal	$1.31B	4.36	$57M	$4.16	26.00

Ternium currently has a consensus target price of $51.50, indicating a potential downside of 5.74%. Warrior Met Coal has a consensus target price of $102.60, indicating a potential downside of 5.15%. Given Warrior Met Coal's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Warrior Met Coal is more favorable than Ternium.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ternium	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.55
Warrior Met Coal	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.57

12.0% of Ternium shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.3% of Warrior Met Coal shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Ternium shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Warrior Met Coal shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Warrior Met Coal had 12 more articles in the media than Ternium. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Warrior Met Coal and 2 mentions for Ternium. Warrior Met Coal's average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat Ternium's score of 0.67 indicating that Warrior Met Coal is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Ternium	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Warrior Met Coal	11 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Ternium pays an annual dividend of $2.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Warrior Met Coal pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Ternium pays out 73.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Warrior Met Coal pays out 7.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Warrior Met Coal has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Ternium has a beta of 1.25, meaning that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Warrior Met Coal has a beta of 0.65, meaning that its stock price is 35% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Warrior Met Coal beats Ternium on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Warrior Met Coal compare to Gerdau?

Gerdau (NYSE:GGB) and Warrior Met Coal (NYSE:HCC) are both mid-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Warrior Met Coal has a net margin of 13.05% compared to Gerdau's net margin of 3.37%. Warrior Met Coal's return on equity of 10.02% beat Gerdau's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Gerdau	3.37%	7.97%	5.18%
Warrior Met Coal	13.05%	10.02%	7.84%

Gerdau has a beta of 1.48, suggesting that its share price is 48% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Warrior Met Coal has a beta of 0.65, suggesting that its share price is 35% less volatile than the broader market.

Gerdau pays an annual dividend of $0.15 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Warrior Met Coal pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Gerdau pays out 65.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Warrior Met Coal pays out 7.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Warrior Met Coal has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

1.5% of Gerdau shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.3% of Warrior Met Coal shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of Gerdau shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Warrior Met Coal shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Gerdau has higher revenue and earnings than Warrior Met Coal. Gerdau is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Warrior Met Coal, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Gerdau	$12.51B	0.73	$248.41M	$0.23	20.20
Warrior Met Coal	$1.31B	4.36	$57M	$4.16	26.00

Gerdau presently has a consensus target price of $5.45, suggesting a potential upside of 17.33%. Warrior Met Coal has a consensus target price of $102.60, suggesting a potential downside of 5.15%. Given Gerdau's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Gerdau is more favorable than Warrior Met Coal.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Gerdau	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.44
Warrior Met Coal	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.57

In the previous week, Warrior Met Coal had 12 more articles in the media than Gerdau. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Warrior Met Coal and 2 mentions for Gerdau. Warrior Met Coal's average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat Gerdau's score of 0.78 indicating that Warrior Met Coal is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Gerdau	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Warrior Met Coal	11 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Warrior Met Coal beats Gerdau on 14 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Warrior Met Coal News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding HCC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

HCC vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Warrior Met Coal	Metals & Mining Industry	Materials Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$5.72B	$4.02B	$5.04B	$24.01B
Dividend Yield	0.30%	5.16%	4.67%	3.72%
P/E Ratio	26.04	25.43	26.10	29.83
Price / Sales	4.36	7,482.73	4,447.64	16.78
Price / Cash	22.61	26.68	24.69	19.75
Price / Book	2.66	10.69	8.99	4.82
Net Income	$57M	$125.14M	$156.32M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	1.60%	7.97%	5.95%	-0.87%
1 Month Performance	35.94%	24.31%	18.85%	1.58%
1 Year Performance	76.34%	59.70%	46.55%	12.85%

Warrior Met Coal Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
HCC Warrior Met Coal	3.5268 of 5 stars	$108.17 +1.0%	$102.60 -5.2%	+74.5%	$5.72B	$1.31B	26.04	1,485	Positive News
AMR Alpha Metallurgical Resources	2.6451 of 5 stars	$209.90 -0.1%	$176.00 -16.2%	+51.5%	$2.66B	$2.13B	N/A	3,960	Positive News
BTU Peabody Energy	3.4994 of 5 stars	$27.91 +1.1%	$33.88 +21.4%	+66.2%	$3.36B	$3.86B	N/A	5,400	Gap Up
PKX POSCO	3.2445 of 5 stars	$58.68 +2.3%	N/A	+16.6%	$17.34B	$69.43T	22.23	42,873	Gap Up
TX Ternium	4.7757 of 5 stars	$55.11 -0.6%	$49.50 -10.2%	+66.1%	$11.12B	$15.61B	15.48	33,253	Gap Up

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:HCC) was last updated on 8/31/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Warrior Met Coal (HCC) Competitors

HCC vs. AMR, BTU, PKX, TX, and GGB

How does Warrior Met Coal compare to Alpha Metallurgical Resources?

Summary

How does Warrior Met Coal compare to Peabody Energy?

Summary

How does Warrior Met Coal compare to POSCO?

Summary

How does Warrior Met Coal compare to Ternium?

Summary

How does Warrior Met Coal compare to Gerdau?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

HCC vs. The Competition

Warrior Met Coal Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Warrior Met Coal (HCC) Competitors

HCC vs. AMR, BTU, PKX, TX, and GGB

How does Warrior Met Coal compare to Alpha Metallurgical Resources?

Do analysts rate AMR or HCC?

Is AMR or HCC more profitable?

Does the media refer more to AMR or HCC?

Which has better earnings and valuation, AMR or HCC?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of AMR or HCC?

Which has more risk and volatility, AMR or HCC?

Summary

How does Warrior Met Coal compare to Peabody Energy?

Is HCC or BTU more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in HCC or BTU?

Is HCC or BTU a better dividend stock?

Which has better earnings and valuation, HCC or BTU?

Do analysts rate HCC or BTU?

Does the media prefer HCC or BTU?

Which has more risk and volatility, HCC or BTU?

Summary

How does Warrior Met Coal compare to POSCO?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of PKX or HCC?

Does the media refer more to PKX or HCC?

Which has more volatility and risk, PKX or HCC?

Is PKX or HCC a better dividend stock?

Is PKX or HCC more profitable?

Do analysts recommend PKX or HCC?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, PKX or HCC?

Summary

How does Warrior Met Coal compare to Ternium?

Is TX or HCC more profitable?

Which has better earnings and valuation, TX or HCC?

Do analysts rate TX or HCC?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of TX or HCC?

Does the media refer more to TX or HCC?

Is TX or HCC a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk and volatility, TX or HCC?

Summary

How does Warrior Met Coal compare to Gerdau?

Is GGB or HCC more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, GGB or HCC?

Is GGB or HCC a better dividend stock?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in GGB or HCC?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, GGB or HCC?

Do analysts rate GGB or HCC?

Does the media favor GGB or HCC?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

HCC vs. The Competition

Warrior Met Coal Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools