Warrior Met Coal Competitors

Ultrapar Participações (NYSE:UGP) and Warrior Met Coal (NYSE:HCC) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

3.4% of Ultrapar Participações shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.2% of Warrior Met Coal shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Warrior Met Coal shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Ultrapar Participações and Warrior Met Coal's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Warrior Met Coal has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Ultrapar Participações. Warrior Met Coal is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ultrapar Participações, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Ultrapar Participações pays an annual dividend of $0.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Warrior Met Coal pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Ultrapar Participações pays out 33.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Warrior Met Coal pays out 3.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Warrior Met Coal has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Ultrapar Participações and Warrior Met Coal, as reported by MarketBeat.

Ultrapar Participações currently has a consensus price target of $4.60, suggesting a potential upside of 31.81%. Warrior Met Coal has a consensus price target of $22.1667, suggesting a potential upside of 15.63%. Given Ultrapar Participações' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Ultrapar Participações is more favorable than Warrior Met Coal.

Profitability

This table compares Ultrapar Participações and Warrior Met Coal's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility & Risk

Ultrapar Participações has a beta of 1.35, indicating that its share price is 35% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Warrior Met Coal has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its share price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Warrior Met Coal beats Ultrapar Participações on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Warrior Met Coal (NYSE:HCC) and TechnipFMC (NYSE:FTI) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, valuation, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

98.2% of Warrior Met Coal shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.5% of TechnipFMC shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Warrior Met Coal shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of TechnipFMC shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Warrior Met Coal and TechnipFMC's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Warrior Met Coal has higher earnings, but lower revenue than TechnipFMC. Warrior Met Coal is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TechnipFMC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Warrior Met Coal and TechnipFMC, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Warrior Met Coal presently has a consensus price target of $22.1667, suggesting a potential upside of 15.63%. TechnipFMC has a consensus price target of $10.4179, suggesting a potential upside of 26.74%. Given TechnipFMC's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe TechnipFMC is more favorable than Warrior Met Coal.

Profitability

This table compares Warrior Met Coal and TechnipFMC's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk & Volatility

Warrior Met Coal has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its share price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, TechnipFMC has a beta of 2.38, indicating that its share price is 138% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Warrior Met Coal (NYSE:HCC) and PDC Energy (NASDAQ:PDCE) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, valuation, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

98.2% of Warrior Met Coal shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Warrior Met Coal shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of PDC Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Warrior Met Coal and PDC Energy's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Warrior Met Coal has higher revenue and earnings than PDC Energy. Warrior Met Coal is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PDC Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Warrior Met Coal and PDC Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Warrior Met Coal presently has a consensus price target of $22.1667, suggesting a potential upside of 15.63%. PDC Energy has a consensus price target of $26.0667, suggesting a potential downside of 25.42%. Given Warrior Met Coal's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Warrior Met Coal is more favorable than PDC Energy.

Profitability

This table compares Warrior Met Coal and PDC Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk & Volatility

Warrior Met Coal has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its share price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, PDC Energy has a beta of 3.28, indicating that its share price is 228% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Warrior Met Coal (NYSE:HCC) and Murphy USA (NYSE:MUSA) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, valuation, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

98.2% of Warrior Met Coal shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.2% of Murphy USA shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Warrior Met Coal shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 7.1% of Murphy USA shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Warrior Met Coal and Murphy USA's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Warrior Met Coal has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Murphy USA. Warrior Met Coal is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Murphy USA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Warrior Met Coal pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Murphy USA pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Warrior Met Coal pays out 3.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Murphy USA pays out 19.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Warrior Met Coal has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Murphy USA has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Warrior Met Coal is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Warrior Met Coal and Murphy USA, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Warrior Met Coal presently has a consensus price target of $22.1667, suggesting a potential upside of 15.63%. Murphy USA has a consensus price target of $142.00, suggesting a potential upside of 13.92%. Given Warrior Met Coal's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Warrior Met Coal is more favorable than Murphy USA.

Profitability

This table compares Warrior Met Coal and Murphy USA's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

Warrior Met Coal has a beta of 1.25, suggesting that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Murphy USA has a beta of 0.99, suggesting that its stock price is 1% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Warrior Met Coal beats Murphy USA on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Warrior Met Coal (NYSE:HCC) and Equitrans Midstream (NYSE:ETRN) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, valuation, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

98.2% of Warrior Met Coal shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.9% of Equitrans Midstream shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Warrior Met Coal shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Equitrans Midstream shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Warrior Met Coal and Equitrans Midstream, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Warrior Met Coal presently has a consensus price target of $22.1667, suggesting a potential upside of 15.63%. Equitrans Midstream has a consensus price target of $10.1429, suggesting a potential upside of 40.29%. Given Equitrans Midstream's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Equitrans Midstream is more favorable than Warrior Met Coal.

Profitability

This table compares Warrior Met Coal and Equitrans Midstream's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

Warrior Met Coal has a beta of 1.25, suggesting that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Equitrans Midstream has a beta of 2.23, suggesting that its stock price is 123% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Warrior Met Coal pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Equitrans Midstream pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.3%. Warrior Met Coal pays out 3.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Equitrans Midstream pays out 20.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Warrior Met Coal has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Equitrans Midstream has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Warrior Met Coal and Equitrans Midstream's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Warrior Met Coal has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Equitrans Midstream. Equitrans Midstream is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Warrior Met Coal, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Equitrans Midstream beats Warrior Met Coal on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Helmerich & Payne (NYSE:HP) and Warrior Met Coal (NYSE:HCC) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

88.1% of Helmerich & Payne shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.2% of Warrior Met Coal shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.5% of Helmerich & Payne shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Warrior Met Coal shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Helmerich & Payne and Warrior Met Coal, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Helmerich & Payne presently has a consensus target price of $21.6842, suggesting a potential downside of 24.52%. Warrior Met Coal has a consensus target price of $22.1667, suggesting a potential upside of 15.63%. Given Warrior Met Coal's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Warrior Met Coal is more favorable than Helmerich & Payne.

Profitability

This table compares Helmerich & Payne and Warrior Met Coal's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

Helmerich & Payne has a beta of 2.25, indicating that its stock price is 125% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Warrior Met Coal has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Helmerich & Payne pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Warrior Met Coal pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Helmerich & Payne pays out -116.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Warrior Met Coal pays out 3.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Helmerich & Payne has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Warrior Met Coal has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Helmerich & Payne is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Helmerich & Payne and Warrior Met Coal's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Warrior Met Coal has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Helmerich & Payne. Helmerich & Payne is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Warrior Met Coal, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Warrior Met Coal beats Helmerich & Payne on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.