Go Pro
→ Trump's New Dollar (From Porter & Company) (Ad)tc pixel Free CION Stock Alerts

CION Investment (CION) Competitors

CION Investment logo
$6.42 +0.02 (+0.23%)
Closing price 07/13/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$6.45 +0.04 (+0.61%)
As of 07:05 AM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.
Compare

CION vs. MFIC, HQH, GSBD, ASA, and MYN

Should you buy CION Investment stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares CION Investment with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with CION Investment include MidCap Financial Investment (MFIC), abrdn Healthcare Investors (HQH), Goldman Sachs BDC (GSBD), ASA Gold and Precious Metals (ASA), and BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund (MYN). These companies are all part of the "financial services" industry.

How does CION Investment compare to MidCap Financial Investment?

CION Investment (NYSE:CION) and MidCap Financial Investment (NASDAQ:MFIC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

In the previous week, CION Investment and CION Investment both had 2 articles in the media. CION Investment's average media sentiment score of 0.74 beat MidCap Financial Investment's score of 0.47 indicating that CION Investment is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
CION Investment
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
MidCap Financial Investment
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

32.0% of CION Investment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.5% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of CION Investment shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

CION Investment has a beta of 1.1, meaning that its stock price is 10% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.6, meaning that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the broader market.

MidCap Financial Investment has higher revenue and earnings than CION Investment. CION Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MidCap Financial Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CION Investment$240.82M1.33-$20.63M-$0.04N/A
MidCap Financial Investment$320.88M2.51$63.17M$0.04244.25

CION Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 18.7%. MidCap Financial Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.7%. CION Investment pays out -3,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. MidCap Financial Investment pays out 3,100.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. CION Investment has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. CION Investment is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

CION Investment currently has a consensus price target of $6.50, suggesting a potential upside of 1.33%. MidCap Financial Investment has a consensus price target of $11.46, suggesting a potential upside of 17.34%. Given MidCap Financial Investment's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe MidCap Financial Investment is more favorable than CION Investment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CION Investment
2 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
MidCap Financial Investment
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.22

MidCap Financial Investment has a net margin of 1.90% compared to CION Investment's net margin of -0.41%. CION Investment's return on equity of 11.96% beat MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CION Investment-0.41% 11.96% 4.64%
MidCap Financial Investment 1.90%10.86%4.31%

Summary

MidCap Financial Investment beats CION Investment on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CION Investment compare to abrdn Healthcare Investors?

CION Investment (NYSE:CION) and abrdn Healthcare Investors (NYSE:HQH) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, CION Investment had 2 more articles in the media than abrdn Healthcare Investors. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for CION Investment and 0 mentions for abrdn Healthcare Investors. CION Investment's average media sentiment score of 0.74 beat abrdn Healthcare Investors' score of 0.00 indicating that CION Investment is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
CION Investment Positive
abrdn Healthcare Investors Neutral

CION Investment currently has a consensus price target of $6.50, suggesting a potential upside of 1.33%. Given CION Investment's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe CION Investment is more favorable than abrdn Healthcare Investors.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CION Investment
2 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
abrdn Healthcare Investors
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

CION Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 18.7%. abrdn Healthcare Investors pays an annual dividend of $2.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.0%. CION Investment pays out -3,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CION Investment has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. CION Investment is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

abrdn Healthcare Investors has a net margin of 0.00% compared to CION Investment's net margin of -0.41%. CION Investment's return on equity of 11.96% beat abrdn Healthcare Investors' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CION Investment-0.41% 11.96% 4.64%
abrdn Healthcare Investors N/A N/A N/A

abrdn Healthcare Investors has lower revenue, but higher earnings than CION Investment.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CION Investment$240.82M1.33-$20.63M-$0.04N/A
abrdn Healthcare InvestorsN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

32.0% of CION Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.6% of abrdn Healthcare Investors shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of CION Investment shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 7.3% of abrdn Healthcare Investors shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

CION Investment has a beta of 1.1, indicating that its share price is 10% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, abrdn Healthcare Investors has a beta of 0.78, indicating that its share price is 22% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

CION Investment beats abrdn Healthcare Investors on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CION Investment compare to Goldman Sachs BDC?

CION Investment (NYSE:CION) and Goldman Sachs BDC (NYSE:GSBD) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings and dividends.

Goldman Sachs BDC has higher revenue and earnings than CION Investment. CION Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Goldman Sachs BDC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CION Investment$240.82M1.33-$20.63M-$0.04N/A
Goldman Sachs BDC$365.57M2.72$119.27M$0.6513.58

CION Investment currently has a consensus price target of $6.50, suggesting a potential upside of 1.33%. Goldman Sachs BDC has a consensus price target of $8.50, suggesting a potential downside of 3.68%. Given CION Investment's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe CION Investment is more favorable than Goldman Sachs BDC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CION Investment
2 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Goldman Sachs BDC
4 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.43

Goldman Sachs BDC has a net margin of 21.32% compared to CION Investment's net margin of -0.41%. CION Investment's return on equity of 11.96% beat Goldman Sachs BDC's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CION Investment-0.41% 11.96% 4.64%
Goldman Sachs BDC 21.32%10.94%4.66%

32.0% of CION Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.7% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of CION Investment shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Goldman Sachs BDC had 5 more articles in the media than CION Investment. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Goldman Sachs BDC and 2 mentions for CION Investment. CION Investment's average media sentiment score of 0.74 beat Goldman Sachs BDC's score of 0.19 indicating that CION Investment is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
CION Investment
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Goldman Sachs BDC
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

CION Investment has a beta of 1.1, indicating that its share price is 10% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Goldman Sachs BDC has a beta of 0.56, indicating that its share price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

CION Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 18.7%. Goldman Sachs BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.5%. CION Investment pays out -3,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Goldman Sachs BDC pays out 196.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. CION Investment has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. CION Investment is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

CION Investment beats Goldman Sachs BDC on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CION Investment compare to ASA Gold and Precious Metals?

CION Investment (NYSE:CION) and ASA Gold and Precious Metals (NYSE:ASA) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, profitability, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings and analyst recommendations.

ASA Gold and Precious Metals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to CION Investment's net margin of -0.41%. CION Investment's return on equity of 11.96% beat ASA Gold and Precious Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CION Investment-0.41% 11.96% 4.64%
ASA Gold and Precious Metals N/A N/A N/A

CION Investment has a beta of 1.1, suggesting that its stock price is 10% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ASA Gold and Precious Metals has a beta of 0.74, suggesting that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

CION Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 18.7%. ASA Gold and Precious Metals pays an annual dividend of $0.07 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. CION Investment pays out -3,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CION Investment has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. CION Investment is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

CION Investment presently has a consensus price target of $6.50, indicating a potential upside of 1.33%. Given CION Investment's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe CION Investment is more favorable than ASA Gold and Precious Metals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CION Investment
2 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
ASA Gold and Precious Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

ASA Gold and Precious Metals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than CION Investment.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CION Investment$240.82M1.33-$20.63M-$0.04N/A
ASA Gold and Precious MetalsN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

32.0% of CION Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of CION Investment shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of ASA Gold and Precious Metals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, ASA Gold and Precious Metals had 6 more articles in the media than CION Investment. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for ASA Gold and Precious Metals and 2 mentions for CION Investment. CION Investment's average media sentiment score of 0.74 beat ASA Gold and Precious Metals' score of 0.42 indicating that CION Investment is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
CION Investment
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
ASA Gold and Precious Metals
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

CION Investment beats ASA Gold and Precious Metals on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CION Investment compare to BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund?

CION Investment (NYSE:CION) and BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund (NYSE:MYN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability and risk.

32.0% of CION Investment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.3% of BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of CION Investment shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

CION Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 18.7%. BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.46 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. CION Investment pays out -3,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CION Investment has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. CION Investment is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

CION Investment currently has a consensus target price of $6.50, indicating a potential upside of 1.33%. Given CION Investment's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe CION Investment is more favorable than BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CION Investment
2 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

CION Investment has a beta of 1.1, meaning that its share price is 10% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund has a beta of 0.73, meaning that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, CION Investment and CION Investment both had 2 articles in the media. BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat CION Investment's score of 0.74 indicating that BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
CION Investment
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund has lower revenue, but higher earnings than CION Investment.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CION Investment$240.82M1.33-$20.63M-$0.04N/A
BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality FundN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund has a net margin of 0.00% compared to CION Investment's net margin of -0.41%. CION Investment's return on equity of 11.96% beat BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CION Investment-0.41% 11.96% 4.64%
BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund N/A N/A N/A

Summary

CION Investment beats BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get CION Investment News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CION and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CION and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CION vs. The Competition

Export
MetricCION InvestmentFIN IndustryFinance SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$318.65M$1.30B$14.26B$23.46B
Dividend Yield18.75%13.18%5.70%4.02%
P/E Ratio-160.3311.2620.4831.08
Price / Sales1.3314.0845.1719.77
Price / Cash3.316.9019.3418.64
Price / Book0.470.762.254.77
Net Income-$20.63M$121.13M$1.13B$1.06B
7 Day Performance0.63%-0.19%-0.32%-0.23%
1 Month Performance-8.16%-3.05%0.66%-0.11%
1 Year Performance-35.43%-24.81%11.82%16.46%

CION Investment Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CION
CION Investment
1.9166 of 5 stars		$6.42
+0.2%		$6.50
+1.3%		-34.8%$318.65M$240.82MN/AN/A
MFIC
MidCap Financial Investment
2.2111 of 5 stars		$10.00
+0.1%		$11.46
+14.6%		-25.8%$823.73M$22.82M250.06N/A
HQH
abrdn Healthcare Investors
N/A$22.18
+0.8%		N/A+33.7%$1.27BN/AN/A147,000
GSBD
Goldman Sachs BDC
2.3706 of 5 stars		$9.01
-1.9%		$9.17
+1.8%		-25.2%$1.01B$365.57M13.85N/A
ASA
ASA Gold and Precious Metals
1.848 of 5 stars		$52.70
-3.5%		N/A+55.4%$996.49MN/AN/A1,100

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:CION) was last updated on 7/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Trump’s $250 Bill – See Immediately
Former Goldman Sachs VP Dr. David Eifrig is warning that July 28 could trigger the biggest wealth reset in mod...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
SPCX Warning - and Worst News for Stocks in 50 Years
Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are now predicting what could be the worst news for the U.S. stock market in ...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
They told you not to miss this one
The largest companies in the SP 500 are now more overvalued relative to fundamentals than they were at the abs...
Thor Metals | Sponsoredtc pixel
Forget SpaceX, this is Elon’s Next Breakthrough
Jeff Brown and Marc Chaikin - two investors who called Nvidia a decade ago - say Elon Musk's newly filed AI pa...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book attached
Bill Poulos is giving away his 'Safe Trade Options Formula' book for free - but only for a limited time throug...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
BofA: Digital Dollar Coming 2025-2030
Bank of America just revealed your expiration date. In their Bloomberg interview, they didn't just predict the...
Decentralized Masters | Sponsoredtc pixel