CION Investment (CION) Competitors

CION Investment logo
$6.29 -0.04 (-0.63%)
As of 06/23/2026 03:58 PM Eastern

CION vs. MFIC, MUC, ASA, HQH, and GSBD

Should you buy CION Investment stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares CION Investment with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with CION Investment include MidCap Financial Investment (MFIC), BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund (MUC), ASA Gold and Precious Metals (ASA), abrdn Healthcare Investors (HQH), and Goldman Sachs BDC (GSBD). These companies are all part of the "financial services" industry.

How does CION Investment compare to MidCap Financial Investment?

MidCap Financial Investment (NASDAQ:MFIC) and CION Investment (NYSE:CION) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation and risk.

28.5% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.0% of CION Investment shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of CION Investment shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

MidCap Financial Investment has higher revenue and earnings than CION Investment. CION Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MidCap Financial Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MidCap Financial Investment$320.88M2.54$63.17M$0.04247.00
CION Investment$10.78M29.04-$20.63M-$0.04N/A

MidCap Financial Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.6%. CION Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 19.1%. MidCap Financial Investment pays out 3,100.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. CION Investment pays out -3,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CION Investment has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. CION Investment is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

MidCap Financial Investment currently has a consensus price target of $11.54, suggesting a potential upside of 16.76%. CION Investment has a consensus price target of $6.50, suggesting a potential upside of 3.34%. Given MidCap Financial Investment's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe MidCap Financial Investment is more favorable than CION Investment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
MidCap Financial Investment
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.22
CION Investment
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67

MidCap Financial Investment has a net margin of 1.90% compared to CION Investment's net margin of -0.41%. CION Investment's return on equity of 11.96% beat MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
MidCap Financial Investment1.90% 10.86% 4.31%
CION Investment -0.41%11.96%4.64%

MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.59, indicating that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CION Investment has a beta of 1.1, indicating that its share price is 10% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, MidCap Financial Investment had 1 more articles in the media than CION Investment. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for MidCap Financial Investment and 1 mentions for CION Investment. CION Investment's average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat MidCap Financial Investment's score of 0.00 indicating that CION Investment is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
MidCap Financial Investment
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
CION Investment
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

MidCap Financial Investment beats CION Investment on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CION Investment compare to BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund?

BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund (NYSE:MUC) and CION Investment (NYSE:CION) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, risk and media sentiment.

BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund has a net margin of 0.00% compared to CION Investment's net margin of -0.41%. CION Investment's return on equity of 11.96% beat BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality FundN/A N/A N/A
CION Investment -0.41%11.96%4.64%

In the previous week, CION Investment had 1 more articles in the media than BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for CION Investment and 0 mentions for BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund. CION Investment's average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund's score of 0.00 indicating that CION Investment is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund Neutral
CION Investment Neutral

BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund has a beta of 0.66, suggesting that its share price is 34% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CION Investment has a beta of 1.1, suggesting that its share price is 10% more volatile than the broader market.

CION Investment has a consensus price target of $6.50, suggesting a potential upside of 3.34%. Given CION Investment's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe CION Investment is more favorable than BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
CION Investment
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67

31.0% of BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.0% of CION Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of CION Investment shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.4%. CION Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 19.1%. CION Investment pays out -3,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CION Investment has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. CION Investment is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund has higher revenue and earnings than CION Investment.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund$26.56M51.25N/AN/AN/A
CION Investment$10.78M29.04-$20.63M-$0.04N/A

Summary

CION Investment beats BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CION Investment compare to ASA Gold and Precious Metals?

ASA Gold and Precious Metals (NYSE:ASA) and CION Investment (NYSE:CION) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

ASA Gold and Precious Metals has a beta of 0.69, indicating that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CION Investment has a beta of 1.1, indicating that its stock price is 10% more volatile than the broader market.

ASA Gold and Precious Metals pays an annual dividend of $0.07 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. CION Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 19.1%. CION Investment pays out -3,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CION Investment has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. CION Investment is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

ASA Gold and Precious Metals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to CION Investment's net margin of -0.41%. CION Investment's return on equity of 11.96% beat ASA Gold and Precious Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ASA Gold and Precious MetalsN/A N/A N/A
CION Investment -0.41%11.96%4.64%

32.0% of CION Investment shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of ASA Gold and Precious Metals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of CION Investment shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, ASA Gold and Precious Metals and ASA Gold and Precious Metals both had 1 articles in the media. ASA Gold and Precious Metals' average media sentiment score of 1.24 beat CION Investment's score of 0.34 indicating that ASA Gold and Precious Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
ASA Gold and Precious Metals
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
CION Investment
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

ASA Gold and Precious Metals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than CION Investment.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ASA Gold and Precious MetalsN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
CION Investment$10.78M29.04-$20.63M-$0.04N/A

CION Investment has a consensus target price of $6.50, suggesting a potential upside of 3.34%. Given CION Investment's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe CION Investment is more favorable than ASA Gold and Precious Metals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
ASA Gold and Precious Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
CION Investment
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67

Summary

CION Investment beats ASA Gold and Precious Metals on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CION Investment compare to abrdn Healthcare Investors?

CION Investment (NYSE:CION) and abrdn Healthcare Investors (NYSE:HQH) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, risk and valuation.

CION Investment has a beta of 1.1, meaning that its stock price is 10% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, abrdn Healthcare Investors has a beta of 0.8, meaning that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the broader market.

abrdn Healthcare Investors has lower revenue, but higher earnings than CION Investment.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CION Investment$10.78M29.04-$20.63M-$0.04N/A
abrdn Healthcare InvestorsN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

abrdn Healthcare Investors has a net margin of 0.00% compared to CION Investment's net margin of -0.41%. CION Investment's return on equity of 11.96% beat abrdn Healthcare Investors' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CION Investment-0.41% 11.96% 4.64%
abrdn Healthcare Investors N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, CION Investment had 1 more articles in the media than abrdn Healthcare Investors. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for CION Investment and 0 mentions for abrdn Healthcare Investors. CION Investment's average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat abrdn Healthcare Investors' score of 0.00 indicating that CION Investment is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
CION Investment Neutral
abrdn Healthcare Investors Neutral

32.0% of CION Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.6% of abrdn Healthcare Investors shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of CION Investment shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.3% of abrdn Healthcare Investors shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

CION Investment presently has a consensus price target of $6.50, indicating a potential upside of 3.34%. Given CION Investment's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe CION Investment is more favorable than abrdn Healthcare Investors.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CION Investment
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67
abrdn Healthcare Investors
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

CION Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 19.1%. abrdn Healthcare Investors pays an annual dividend of $2.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.3%. CION Investment pays out -3,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CION Investment has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. CION Investment is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

CION Investment beats abrdn Healthcare Investors on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CION Investment compare to Goldman Sachs BDC?

Goldman Sachs BDC (NYSE:GSBD) and CION Investment (NYSE:CION) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk and institutional ownership.

Goldman Sachs BDC has a net margin of 21.32% compared to CION Investment's net margin of -0.41%. CION Investment's return on equity of 11.96% beat Goldman Sachs BDC's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Goldman Sachs BDC21.32% 10.94% 4.66%
CION Investment -0.41%11.96%4.64%

In the previous week, Goldman Sachs BDC and Goldman Sachs BDC both had 1 articles in the media. CION Investment's average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat Goldman Sachs BDC's score of 0.00 indicating that CION Investment is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Goldman Sachs BDC
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
CION Investment
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Goldman Sachs BDC has higher revenue and earnings than CION Investment. CION Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Goldman Sachs BDC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Goldman Sachs BDC$365.57M2.91$119.27M$0.6514.54
CION Investment$10.78M29.04-$20.63M-$0.04N/A

28.7% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.0% of CION Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of CION Investment shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Goldman Sachs BDC currently has a consensus target price of $9.17, suggesting a potential downside of 3.00%. CION Investment has a consensus target price of $6.50, suggesting a potential upside of 3.34%. Given CION Investment's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe CION Investment is more favorable than Goldman Sachs BDC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Goldman Sachs BDC
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67
CION Investment
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67

Goldman Sachs BDC has a beta of 0.58, indicating that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CION Investment has a beta of 1.1, indicating that its stock price is 10% more volatile than the broader market.

Goldman Sachs BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.5%. CION Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 19.1%. Goldman Sachs BDC pays out 196.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. CION Investment pays out -3,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CION Investment has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. CION Investment is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

CION Investment beats Goldman Sachs BDC on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get CION Investment News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CION and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CION and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CION vs. The Competition

MetricCION InvestmentFIN IndustryFinance SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$315.16M$1.25B$13.98B$23.26B
Dividend Yield18.32%13.69%5.76%4.07%
P/E Ratio-157.2110.7520.2331.08
Price / Sales29.0416.02143.9321.83
Price / Cash3.286.7619.5224.45
Price / Book0.460.752.254.64
Net Income-$20.63M$121.13M$1.14B$1.07B
7 Day Performance-6.75%-0.58%0.59%0.15%
1 Month Performance-4.19%-2.84%1.13%0.18%
1 Year Performance-32.95%-22.43%14.61%23.21%

CION Investment Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CION
CION Investment
1.797 of 5 stars
$6.29
-0.6%
$6.50
+3.3%
-32.1%$315.16M$10.78MN/AN/A
MFIC
MidCap Financial Investment
2.0754 of 5 stars
$10.11
+0.4%
$11.54
+14.2%
-19.4%$830.70M$320.88M252.19N/A
MUC
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund
N/A$10.77
+0.1%
N/A+6.2%$1.35BN/AN/A147,000
ASA
ASA Gold and Precious Metals
2.3775 of 5 stars
$62.43
+3.1%
N/A+70.5%$1.18BN/AN/A1,100
HQH
abrdn Healthcare Investors
N/A$19.51
-0.1%
N/A+35.4%$1.11BN/AN/A147,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:CION) was last updated on 6/24/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners