Free Trial

CION Investment (CION) Competitors

CION Investment logo
$6.84 -0.45 (-6.21%)
Closing price 05/11/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$6.85 +0.01 (+0.19%)
As of 07:12 AM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

CION vs. SLRC, MUC, ASA, HQH, and GSBD

Should you be buying CION Investment stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of CION Investment include SLR Investment (SLRC), BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund (MUC), ASA Gold and Precious Metals (ASA), abrdn Healthcare Investors (HQH), and Goldman Sachs BDC (GSBD). These companies are all part of the "finance" sector.

How does CION Investment compare to SLR Investment?

CION Investment (NYSE:CION) and SLR Investment (NASDAQ:SLRC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations and valuation.

CION Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 17.6%. SLR Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.4%. CION Investment pays out -3,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. SLR Investment pays out 100.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. CION Investment has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. CION Investment is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

32.0% of CION Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.3% of SLR Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of CION Investment shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 8.8% of SLR Investment shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

SLR Investment has higher revenue and earnings than CION Investment. CION Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SLR Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CION Investment$10.78M31.57-$20.63M-$0.04N/A
SLR Investment$218.54M3.31$92.54M$1.648.09

CION Investment currently has a consensus price target of $6.50, suggesting a potential downside of 4.93%. SLR Investment has a consensus price target of $14.83, suggesting a potential upside of 11.78%. Given SLR Investment's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe SLR Investment is more favorable than CION Investment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CION Investment
3 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
SLR Investment
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.14

SLR Investment has a net margin of 41.81% compared to CION Investment's net margin of -0.41%. CION Investment's return on equity of 11.96% beat SLR Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CION Investment-0.41% 11.96% 4.64%
SLR Investment 41.81%8.33%3.25%

In the previous week, SLR Investment had 9 more articles in the media than CION Investment. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for SLR Investment and 13 mentions for CION Investment. CION Investment's average media sentiment score of -0.02 beat SLR Investment's score of -0.20 indicating that CION Investment is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
CION Investment
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
SLR Investment
2 Very Positive mention(s)
5 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
5 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

CION Investment has a beta of 1.16, indicating that its stock price is 16% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, SLR Investment has a beta of 0.71, indicating that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

SLR Investment beats CION Investment on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CION Investment compare to BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund?

BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund (NYSE:MUC) and CION Investment (NYSE:CION) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and profitability.

BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.4%. CION Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 17.6%. CION Investment pays out -3,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CION Investment has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. CION Investment is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

31.0% of BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.0% of CION Investment shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of CION Investment shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund has higher revenue and earnings than CION Investment.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund$26.56M51.03N/AN/AN/A
CION Investment$10.78M31.57-$20.63M-$0.04N/A

CION Investment has a consensus price target of $6.50, suggesting a potential downside of 4.93%. Given CION Investment's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe CION Investment is more favorable than BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
CION Investment
3 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund has a net margin of 0.00% compared to CION Investment's net margin of -0.41%. CION Investment's return on equity of 11.96% beat BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality FundN/A N/A N/A
CION Investment -0.41%11.96%4.64%

In the previous week, CION Investment had 13 more articles in the media than BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for CION Investment and 0 mentions for BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund. BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat CION Investment's score of -0.02 indicating that BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund Neutral
CION Investment Neutral

BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund has a beta of 0.66, suggesting that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CION Investment has a beta of 1.16, suggesting that its stock price is 16% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

CION Investment beats BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CION Investment compare to ASA Gold and Precious Metals?

ASA Gold and Precious Metals (NYSE:ASA) and CION Investment (NYSE:CION) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk and dividends.

ASA Gold and Precious Metals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than CION Investment.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ASA Gold and Precious MetalsN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
CION Investment$10.78M31.57-$20.63M-$0.04N/A

32.0% of CION Investment shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of ASA Gold and Precious Metals shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of CION Investment shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

ASA Gold and Precious Metals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to CION Investment's net margin of -0.41%. CION Investment's return on equity of 11.96% beat ASA Gold and Precious Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ASA Gold and Precious MetalsN/A N/A N/A
CION Investment -0.41%11.96%4.64%

CION Investment has a consensus price target of $6.50, suggesting a potential downside of 4.93%. Given CION Investment's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe CION Investment is more favorable than ASA Gold and Precious Metals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
ASA Gold and Precious Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
CION Investment
3 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

ASA Gold and Precious Metals pays an annual dividend of $0.07 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. CION Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 17.6%. CION Investment pays out -3,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CION Investment has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. CION Investment is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

ASA Gold and Precious Metals has a beta of 0.7, suggesting that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CION Investment has a beta of 1.16, suggesting that its share price is 16% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, CION Investment had 2 more articles in the media than ASA Gold and Precious Metals. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for CION Investment and 11 mentions for ASA Gold and Precious Metals. ASA Gold and Precious Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.41 beat CION Investment's score of -0.02 indicating that ASA Gold and Precious Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
ASA Gold and Precious Metals
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
CION Investment
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

CION Investment beats ASA Gold and Precious Metals on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CION Investment compare to abrdn Healthcare Investors?

abrdn Healthcare Investors (NYSE:HQH) and CION Investment (NYSE:CION) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk and dividends.

CION Investment has a consensus price target of $6.50, suggesting a potential downside of 4.93%. Given CION Investment's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe CION Investment is more favorable than abrdn Healthcare Investors.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
abrdn Healthcare Investors
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
CION Investment
3 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

In the previous week, CION Investment had 8 more articles in the media than abrdn Healthcare Investors. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for CION Investment and 5 mentions for abrdn Healthcare Investors. CION Investment's average media sentiment score of -0.02 beat abrdn Healthcare Investors' score of -0.30 indicating that CION Investment is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
abrdn Healthcare Investors
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
CION Investment
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

abrdn Healthcare Investors pays an annual dividend of $2.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.2%. CION Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 17.6%. CION Investment pays out -3,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CION Investment has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. CION Investment is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

abrdn Healthcare Investors has higher earnings, but lower revenue than CION Investment.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
abrdn Healthcare InvestorsN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
CION Investment$10.78M31.57-$20.63M-$0.04N/A

abrdn Healthcare Investors has a beta of 0.8, suggesting that its share price is 20% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CION Investment has a beta of 1.16, suggesting that its share price is 16% more volatile than the broader market.

abrdn Healthcare Investors has a net margin of 0.00% compared to CION Investment's net margin of -0.41%. CION Investment's return on equity of 11.96% beat abrdn Healthcare Investors' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
abrdn Healthcare InvestorsN/A N/A N/A
CION Investment -0.41%11.96%4.64%

32.6% of abrdn Healthcare Investors shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.0% of CION Investment shares are held by institutional investors. 7.3% of abrdn Healthcare Investors shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of CION Investment shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

CION Investment beats abrdn Healthcare Investors on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CION Investment compare to Goldman Sachs BDC?

CION Investment (NYSE:CION) and Goldman Sachs BDC (NYSE:GSBD) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, risk, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations and valuation.

32.0% of CION Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.7% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of CION Investment shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

CION Investment presently has a consensus price target of $6.50, suggesting a potential downside of 4.93%. Goldman Sachs BDC has a consensus price target of $9.50, suggesting a potential upside of 5.97%. Given Goldman Sachs BDC's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Goldman Sachs BDC is more favorable than CION Investment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CION Investment
3 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Goldman Sachs BDC
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.83

CION Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 17.6%. Goldman Sachs BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.3%. CION Investment pays out -3,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Goldman Sachs BDC pays out 196.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. CION Investment has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. CION Investment is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, CION Investment had 2 more articles in the media than Goldman Sachs BDC. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for CION Investment and 11 mentions for Goldman Sachs BDC. CION Investment's average media sentiment score of -0.02 beat Goldman Sachs BDC's score of -0.17 indicating that CION Investment is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
CION Investment
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Goldman Sachs BDC
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Goldman Sachs BDC has a net margin of 21.32% compared to CION Investment's net margin of -0.41%. CION Investment's return on equity of 11.96% beat Goldman Sachs BDC's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CION Investment-0.41% 11.96% 4.64%
Goldman Sachs BDC 21.32%10.77%4.65%

CION Investment has a beta of 1.16, suggesting that its share price is 16% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Goldman Sachs BDC has a beta of 0.62, suggesting that its share price is 38% less volatile than the broader market.

Goldman Sachs BDC has higher revenue and earnings than CION Investment. CION Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Goldman Sachs BDC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CION Investment$10.78M31.57-$20.63M-$0.04N/A
Goldman Sachs BDC$365.57M2.76$119.27M$0.6513.79

Summary

CION Investment beats Goldman Sachs BDC on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get CION Investment News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CION and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CION and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CION vs. The Competition

MetricCION InvestmentFIN IndustryFinance SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$362.96M$1.33B$13.53B$22.90B
Dividend Yield16.24%12.40%5.75%4.03%
P/E Ratio-170.8822.4923.2228.91
Price / Sales31.5715.72182.36108.04
Price / Cash3.787.5220.3019.21
Price / Book0.500.802.214.65
Net Income-$20.63M$118.06M$1.11B$1.07B
7 Day Performance-13.18%-4.95%0.05%-0.14%
1 Month Performance-1.56%1.75%2.10%3.95%
1 Year Performance-28.60%-18.09%11.56%25.39%

CION Investment Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CION
CION Investment
1.3332 of 5 stars
$6.84
-6.2%
$6.50
-4.9%
-27.5%$362.96M$10.78MN/AN/A
SLRC
SLR Investment
4.3445 of 5 stars
$15.52
+0.4%
$15.29
-1.5%
-16.2%$850.68M$103.31M9.17N/A
MUC
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund
N/A$10.81
-0.1%
N/A+2.4%$1.35BN/AN/A147,000
ASA
ASA Gold and Precious Metals
2.8457 of 5 stars
$63.62
-4.0%
N/A+129.4%$1.20BN/AN/A1,100
HQH
abrdn Healthcare Investors
N/A$19.71
+0.5%
N/A+31.6%$1.13BN/AN/A147,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:CION) was last updated on 5/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners