Free Trial

Global Cord Blood (CO) Competitors

Global Cord Blood logo
$0.95 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 06/5/2026

CO vs. MRAI, KMDA, KIDS, AUTL, and UPB

Should you buy Global Cord Blood stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Global Cord Blood with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Global Cord Blood include Marpai (MRAI), Kamada (KMDA), OrthoPediatrics (KIDS), Autolus Therapeutics (AUTL), and Upstream Bio (UPB).

How does Global Cord Blood compare to Marpai?

Global Cord Blood (NYSE:CO) and Marpai (NASDAQ:MRAI) are both small-cap miscellaneous health & allied services, not elsewhere classified industry companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, profitability, risk and analyst recommendations.

Global Cord Blood has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Marpai's net margin of -85.70%.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Global Cord BloodN/A N/A N/A
Marpai -85.70%N/A -100.23%

49.8% of Marpai shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Global Cord Blood shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 46.1% of Marpai shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Global Cord Blood has higher revenue and earnings than Marpai. Marpai is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Global Cord Blood, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Global Cord Blood$1.24B0.09$79.04M$0.641.48
Marpai$34.87M0.42-$28.75M-$0.87N/A

Global Cord Blood has a beta of 0.16, suggesting that its stock price is 84% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Marpai has a beta of 4.94, suggesting that its stock price is 394% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Global Cord Blood's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Marpai'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Global Cord Blood Neutral
Marpai Neutral

Summary

Global Cord Blood beats Marpai on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Global Cord Blood compare to Kamada?

Global Cord Blood (NYSE:CO) and Kamada (NASDAQ:KMDA) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and dividends.

In the previous week, Kamada had 4 more articles in the media than Global Cord Blood. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Kamada and 0 mentions for Global Cord Blood. Kamada's average media sentiment score of 0.24 beat Global Cord Blood's score of 0.00 indicating that Kamada is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Global Cord Blood Neutral
Kamada Neutral

Kamada has a consensus price target of $12.00, suggesting a potential upside of 67.36%. Given Kamada's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Kamada is more favorable than Global Cord Blood.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Global Cord Blood
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Kamada
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Global Cord Blood has a beta of 0.16, meaning that its stock price is 84% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kamada has a beta of 0.83, meaning that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

Global Cord Blood has higher revenue and earnings than Kamada. Global Cord Blood is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kamada, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Global Cord Blood$1.24B0.09$79.04M$0.641.48
Kamada$181.68M2.27$20.20M$0.3520.49

20.4% of Kamada shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Global Cord Blood shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 36.1% of Kamada shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Global Cord Blood pays an annual dividend of $0.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.4%. Kamada pays an annual dividend of $0.18 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Global Cord Blood pays out 12.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Kamada pays out 51.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Global Cord Blood is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Kamada has a net margin of 11.21% compared to Global Cord Blood's net margin of 0.00%. Kamada's return on equity of 7.73% beat Global Cord Blood's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Global Cord BloodN/A N/A N/A
Kamada 11.21%7.73%5.41%

Summary

Kamada beats Global Cord Blood on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Global Cord Blood compare to OrthoPediatrics?

OrthoPediatrics (NASDAQ:KIDS) and Global Cord Blood (NYSE:CO) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

69.1% of OrthoPediatrics shares are owned by institutional investors. 32.7% of OrthoPediatrics shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Global Cord Blood shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Global Cord Blood has higher revenue and earnings than OrthoPediatrics. OrthoPediatrics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Global Cord Blood, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
OrthoPediatrics$236.35M1.99-$39.65M-$1.68N/A
Global Cord Blood$1.24B0.09$79.04M$0.641.48

OrthoPediatrics currently has a consensus price target of $24.44, indicating a potential upside of 33.43%. Given OrthoPediatrics' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe OrthoPediatrics is more favorable than Global Cord Blood.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
OrthoPediatrics
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.82
Global Cord Blood
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Global Cord Blood has a net margin of 0.00% compared to OrthoPediatrics' net margin of -16.31%. Global Cord Blood's return on equity of 0.00% beat OrthoPediatrics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
OrthoPediatrics-16.31% -7.01% -4.86%
Global Cord Blood N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, OrthoPediatrics' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Global Cord Blood'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
OrthoPediatrics Neutral
Global Cord Blood Neutral

OrthoPediatrics has a beta of 1.03, suggesting that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Global Cord Blood has a beta of 0.16, suggesting that its stock price is 84% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

OrthoPediatrics beats Global Cord Blood on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Global Cord Blood compare to Autolus Therapeutics?

Autolus Therapeutics (NASDAQ:AUTL) and Global Cord Blood (NYSE:CO) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and profitability.

In the previous week, Autolus Therapeutics' average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Global Cord Blood's score of 0.00 indicating that Autolus Therapeutics is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Autolus Therapeutics Positive
Global Cord Blood Neutral

72.8% of Autolus Therapeutics shares are held by institutional investors. 25.7% of Autolus Therapeutics shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Global Cord Blood shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Global Cord Blood has higher revenue and earnings than Autolus Therapeutics. Autolus Therapeutics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Global Cord Blood, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Autolus Therapeutics$75.39M5.40-$287.53M-$1.09N/A
Global Cord Blood$1.24B0.09$79.04M$0.641.48

Autolus Therapeutics has a beta of 2.02, suggesting that its share price is 102% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Global Cord Blood has a beta of 0.16, suggesting that its share price is 84% less volatile than the broader market.

Autolus Therapeutics currently has a consensus price target of $8.75, suggesting a potential upside of 471.90%. Given Autolus Therapeutics' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Autolus Therapeutics is more favorable than Global Cord Blood.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Autolus Therapeutics
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.89
Global Cord Blood
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Global Cord Blood has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Autolus Therapeutics' net margin of -311.98%. Global Cord Blood's return on equity of 0.00% beat Autolus Therapeutics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Autolus Therapeutics-311.98% -128.59% -46.25%
Global Cord Blood N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Autolus Therapeutics beats Global Cord Blood on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Global Cord Blood compare to Upstream Bio?

Global Cord Blood (NYSE:CO) and Upstream Bio (NASDAQ:UPB) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings, media sentiment, valuation and institutional ownership.

Global Cord Blood has higher revenue and earnings than Upstream Bio. Upstream Bio is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Global Cord Blood, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Global Cord Blood$1.24B0.09$79.04M$0.641.48
Upstream Bio$3.32M115.49-$143.44M-$2.91N/A

Global Cord Blood has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Upstream Bio's net margin of -4,718.96%. Global Cord Blood's return on equity of 0.00% beat Upstream Bio's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Global Cord BloodN/A N/A N/A
Upstream Bio -4,718.96%-43.82%-42.27%

Upstream Bio has a consensus price target of $38.20, suggesting a potential upside of 441.84%. Given Upstream Bio's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Upstream Bio is more favorable than Global Cord Blood.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Global Cord Blood
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Upstream Bio
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Global Cord Blood has a beta of 0.16, indicating that its share price is 84% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Upstream Bio has a beta of 1.1, indicating that its share price is 10% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Upstream Bio had 10 more articles in the media than Global Cord Blood. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Upstream Bio and 0 mentions for Global Cord Blood. Upstream Bio's average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat Global Cord Blood's score of 0.00 indicating that Upstream Bio is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Global Cord Blood Neutral
Upstream Bio Positive

Summary

Global Cord Blood and Upstream Bio tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Global Cord Blood News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CO and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CO and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CO vs. The Competition

MetricGlobal Cord Bloodhealth & allied services, not elsewhere classified IndustryMedical SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$115.47M$81.84M$6.46B$23.35B
Dividend YieldN/AN/A2.68%4.08%
P/E Ratio1.480.7423.8230.26
Price / Sales0.090.26577.5413.22
Price / Cash4.194.1942.4224.41
Price / Book0.150.159.734.63
Net Income$79.04M$25.15M$3.57B$1.07B
7 Day PerformanceN/A-7.93%-1.26%-1.66%
1 Month Performance-0.05%37.00%0.82%-1.68%
1 Year PerformanceN/A-27.64%24.09%21.33%

Global Cord Blood Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CO
Global Cord Blood
N/A$0.95
flat
N/AN/A$115.47M$1.24B1.481,202
MRAI
Marpai
N/A$0.63
+47.1%
N/A-54.8%$16.02M$34.87MN/A150
KMDA
Kamada
4.9337 of 5 stars
$8.03
+0.9%
$12.00
+49.5%
+5.8%$460.60M$180.46M22.88360
KIDS
OrthoPediatrics
2.5198 of 5 stars
$17.88
-0.1%
$24.44
+36.7%
-12.2%$459.25M$243.30MN/A200
AUTL
Autolus Therapeutics
3.2975 of 5 stars
$1.73
+2.7%
$8.75
+407.2%
-32.3%$459.10M$92.62MN/A330

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:CO) was last updated on 6/6/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners