NYSE:CUB

Cubic Competitors

$75.00
0.00 (0.00 %)
(As of 05/25/2021)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$75.00
$75.00
50-Day Range
$74.72
$75.00
52-Week Range
$39.97
$78.13
VolumeN/A
Average Volume458,105 shs
Market Capitalization$2.38 billion
P/E Ratio326.09
Dividend Yield0.36%
Beta0.79

Cubic (NYSE:CUB) Vs. HON, BA, LMT, NOC, GD, and TDG

Should you be buying CUB stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "aerospace & defense" are considered alternatives and competitors to Cubic, including Honeywell International (HON), The Boeing (BA), Lockheed Martin (LMT), Northrop Grumman (NOC), General Dynamics (GD), and TransDigm Group (TDG).

Honeywell International (NYSE:HON) and Cubic (NYSE:CUB) are both multi-sector conglomerates companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends and risk.

Risk and Volatility

Honeywell International has a beta of 1.15, indicating that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Cubic has a beta of 0.79, indicating that its stock price is 21% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Honeywell International and Cubic's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Honeywell International14.18%26.51%7.55%
Cubic0.46%13.22%5.51%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Honeywell International and Cubic, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Honeywell International05802.62
Cubic08102.11

Honeywell International currently has a consensus price target of $220.0769, indicating a potential upside of 1.79%. Cubic has a consensus price target of $65.7778, indicating a potential downside of 12.30%. Given Honeywell International's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Honeywell International is more favorable than Cubic.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Honeywell International and Cubic's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Honeywell International$32.64 billion4.60$4.78 billion$7.1030.46
Cubic$1.48 billion1.61$-3,220,000.00$3.3222.59

Honeywell International has higher revenue and earnings than Cubic. Cubic is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Honeywell International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

76.0% of Honeywell International shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Honeywell International shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Cubic shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

Honeywell International pays an annual dividend of $3.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Cubic pays an annual dividend of $0.27 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Honeywell International pays out 52.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cubic pays out 8.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Honeywell International has raised its dividend for 10 consecutive years and Cubic has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Honeywell International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Honeywell International beats Cubic on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

The Boeing (NYSE:BA) and Cubic (NYSE:CUB) are both aerospace companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends and risk.

Volatility and Risk

The Boeing has a beta of 1.62, suggesting that its stock price is 62% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Cubic has a beta of 0.79, suggesting that its stock price is 21% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares The Boeing and Cubic's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
The Boeing-20.86%N/A-8.40%
Cubic0.46%13.22%5.51%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for The Boeing and Cubic, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
The Boeing381402.44
Cubic08102.11

The Boeing currently has a consensus price target of $255.4091, indicating a potential upside of 5.42%. Cubic has a consensus price target of $65.7778, indicating a potential downside of 12.30%. Given The Boeing's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe The Boeing is more favorable than Cubic.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares The Boeing and Cubic's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The Boeing$58.16 billion2.44$-11,873,000,000.00($23.25)-10.42
Cubic$1.48 billion1.61$-3,220,000.00$3.3222.59

Cubic has lower revenue, but higher earnings than The Boeing. The Boeing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cubic, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

53.8% of The Boeing shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of The Boeing shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Cubic shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Lockheed Martin (NYSE:LMT) and Cubic (NYSE:CUB) are both aerospace companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends and risk.

Risk and Volatility

Lockheed Martin has a beta of 0.99, indicating that its stock price is 1% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Cubic has a beta of 0.79, indicating that its stock price is 21% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Lockheed Martin and Cubic's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Lockheed Martin10.53%134.40%14.03%
Cubic0.46%13.22%5.51%

Dividends

Lockheed Martin pays an annual dividend of $10.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Cubic pays an annual dividend of $0.27 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Lockheed Martin pays out 41.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cubic pays out 8.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Lockheed Martin has raised its dividend for 18 consecutive years and Cubic has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Lockheed Martin is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Lockheed Martin and Cubic's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lockheed Martin$65.40 billion1.62$6.83 billion$24.8415.38
Cubic$1.48 billion1.61$-3,220,000.00$3.3222.59

Lockheed Martin has higher revenue and earnings than Cubic. Lockheed Martin is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cubic, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Lockheed Martin and Cubic, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Lockheed Martin04502.56
Cubic08102.11

Lockheed Martin currently has a consensus price target of $414.75, indicating a potential upside of 8.50%. Cubic has a consensus price target of $65.7778, indicating a potential downside of 12.30%. Given Lockheed Martin's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Lockheed Martin is more favorable than Cubic.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

75.7% of Lockheed Martin shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Lockheed Martin shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Cubic shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Lockheed Martin beats Cubic on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Northrop Grumman (NYSE:NOC) and Cubic (NYSE:CUB) are both aerospace companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, dividends and profitability.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

83.3% of Northrop Grumman shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Northrop Grumman shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Cubic shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Northrop Grumman and Cubic's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Northrop Grumman$36.80 billion1.63$3.19 billion$23.6515.76
Cubic$1.48 billion1.61$-3,220,000.00$3.3222.59

Northrop Grumman has higher revenue and earnings than Cubic. Northrop Grumman is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cubic, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

Northrop Grumman has a beta of 0.83, suggesting that its share price is 17% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Cubic has a beta of 0.79, suggesting that its share price is 21% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Northrop Grumman and Cubic's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Northrop Grumman12.10%40.40%9.58%
Cubic0.46%13.22%5.51%

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Northrop Grumman and Cubic, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Northrop Grumman11802.70
Cubic08102.11

Northrop Grumman currently has a consensus price target of $397.00, indicating a potential upside of 6.52%. Cubic has a consensus price target of $65.7778, indicating a potential downside of 12.30%. Given Northrop Grumman's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Northrop Grumman is more favorable than Cubic.

Dividends

Northrop Grumman pays an annual dividend of $6.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Cubic pays an annual dividend of $0.27 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Northrop Grumman pays out 26.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cubic pays out 8.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Northrop Grumman has raised its dividend for 13 consecutive years and Cubic has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Northrop Grumman is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Northrop Grumman beats Cubic on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Cubic (NYSE:CUB) and General Dynamics (NYSE:GD) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, earnings, dividends and risk.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

85.7% of General Dynamics shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Cubic shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.8% of General Dynamics shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Cubic and General Dynamics' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cubic$1.48 billion1.61$-3,220,000.00$3.3222.59
General Dynamics$37.93 billion1.41$3.17 billion$11.0017.24

General Dynamics has higher revenue and earnings than Cubic. General Dynamics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cubic, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

Cubic has a beta of 0.79, suggesting that its stock price is 21% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, General Dynamics has a beta of 1.14, suggesting that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Cubic and General Dynamics' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Cubic0.46%13.22%5.51%
General Dynamics8.22%21.27%6.28%

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Cubic and General Dynamics, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Cubic08102.11
General Dynamics33802.36

Cubic currently has a consensus target price of $65.7778, indicating a potential downside of 12.30%. General Dynamics has a consensus target price of $189.7143, indicating a potential upside of 0.03%. Given General Dynamics' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe General Dynamics is more favorable than Cubic.

Dividends

Cubic pays an annual dividend of $0.27 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. General Dynamics pays an annual dividend of $4.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Cubic pays out 8.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. General Dynamics pays out 43.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Cubic has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and General Dynamics has raised its dividend for 30 consecutive years. General Dynamics is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

General Dynamics beats Cubic on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Cubic (NYSE:CUB) and TransDigm Group (NYSE:TDG) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, earnings, dividends and risk.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

95.3% of TransDigm Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Cubic shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.1% of TransDigm Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Cubic and TransDigm Group's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cubic$1.48 billion1.61$-3,220,000.00$3.3222.59
TransDigm Group$5.10 billion7.22$699 million$14.0447.82

TransDigm Group has higher revenue and earnings than Cubic. Cubic is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TransDigm Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

Cubic has a beta of 0.79, meaning that its stock price is 21% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, TransDigm Group has a beta of 1.64, meaning that its stock price is 64% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Cubic and TransDigm Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Cubic0.46%13.22%5.51%
TransDigm Group5.11%-13.26%2.76%

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Cubic and TransDigm Group, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Cubic08102.11
TransDigm Group041002.71

Cubic currently has a consensus target price of $65.7778, indicating a potential downside of 12.30%. TransDigm Group has a consensus target price of $664.7857, indicating a potential downside of 0.98%. Given TransDigm Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe TransDigm Group is more favorable than Cubic.

Summary

TransDigm Group beats Cubic on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.


Cubic Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Honeywell International logo
HON
Honeywell International
2.5$216.26flat$150.02 billion$32.64 billion33.07
The Boeing logo
BA
The Boeing
1.3$242.28flat$143.44 billion$58.16 billion-11.78
Lockheed Martin logo
LMT
Lockheed Martin
2.2$382.10flat$106.31 billion$65.40 billion15.42
Northrop Grumman logo
NOC
Northrop Grumman
2.5$372.71flat$60.09 billion$36.80 billion13.65
General Dynamics logo
GD
General Dynamics
2.6$189.65flat$53.91 billion$37.93 billion17.16
TransDigm Group logo
TDG
TransDigm Group
1.7$671.35flat$36.83 billion$5.10 billion248.65
HEICO logo
HEI
HEICO
1.5$140.62flat$19.10 billion$1.79 billion75.20
Teledyne Technologies logo
TDY
Teledyne Technologies
1.6$432.19flat$16.07 billion$3.09 billion40.51
Textron logo
TXT
Textron
2.4$65.69flat$14.92 billion$11.65 billion34.94
Huntington Ingalls Industries logo
HII
Huntington Ingalls Industries
2.1$210.76flat$8.57 billion$9.36 billion12.71
Spirit AeroSystems logo
SPR
Spirit AeroSystems
1.4$49.33flat$5.30 billion$3.40 billion-5.83Analyst Report
News Coverage
Hexcel logo
HXL
Hexcel
1.6$61.79flat$5.22 billion$1.50 billion-213.07Analyst Revision
Curtiss-Wright logo
CW
Curtiss-Wright
1.7$121.18flat$5.05 billion$2.39 billion24.04
Aerojet Rocketdyne logo
AJRD
Aerojet Rocketdyne
1.6$48.38flat$3.86 billion$2.07 billion32.25News Coverage
Kratos Defense & Security Solutions logo
KTOS
Kratos Defense & Security Solutions
1.6$26.33flat$3.28 billion$747.70 million41.14
AeroVironment logo
AVAV
AeroVironment
1.4$111.42flat$2.75 billion$367.30 million89.85Upcoming Earnings
AAR logo
AIR
AAR
1.6$40.12flat$1.43 billion$2.07 billion308.62
Triumph Group logo
TGI
Triumph Group
1.1$21.25flat$1.37 billion$1.87 billion-2.48
National Presto Industries logo
NPK
National Presto Industries
1.0$98.74flat$705.22 million$352.63 million14.56News Coverage
Astronics logo
ATRO
Astronics
1.1$17.72flat$561.60 million$502.59 million-8.95
Sypris Solutions logo
SYPR
Sypris Solutions
0.6$3.12flat$69.99 million$82.35 million312.00News Coverage
Gap Down
This page was last updated on 6/22/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more about MarketBeat.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research.