General Dynamics (GD) Competitors

General Dynamics has higher revenue and earnings than Hexcel. General Dynamics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hexcel, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

General Dynamics has a net margin of 8.07% compared to Hexcel's net margin of 6.07%. General Dynamics' return on equity of 17.41% beat Hexcel's return on equity.

In the previous week, General Dynamics had 22 more articles in the media than Hexcel. MarketBeat recorded 28 mentions for General Dynamics and 6 mentions for Hexcel. General Dynamics' average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Hexcel's score of 0.75 indicating that General Dynamics is being referred to more favorably in the media.

General Dynamics has a beta of 0.34, indicating that its stock price is 66% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hexcel has a beta of 1.11, indicating that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market.

General Dynamics currently has a consensus price target of $388.20, indicating a potential upside of 14.27%. Hexcel has a consensus price target of $91.00, indicating a potential downside of 1.18%. Given General Dynamics' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe General Dynamics is more favorable than Hexcel.

86.1% of General Dynamics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.5% of Hexcel shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of General Dynamics shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Hexcel shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

General Dynamics pays an annual dividend of $6.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Hexcel pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. General Dynamics pays out 40.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hexcel pays out 47.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. General Dynamics has increased its dividend for 34 consecutive years and Hexcel has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. General Dynamics is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

General Dynamics has higher revenue and earnings than Leidos. Leidos is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than General Dynamics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Leidos has a net margin of 8.15% compared to General Dynamics' net margin of 8.07%. Leidos' return on equity of 31.92% beat General Dynamics' return on equity.

In the previous week, General Dynamics had 2 more articles in the media than Leidos. MarketBeat recorded 28 mentions for General Dynamics and 26 mentions for Leidos. General Dynamics' average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Leidos' score of 0.47 indicating that General Dynamics is being referred to more favorably in the media.

General Dynamics has a beta of 0.34, suggesting that its stock price is 66% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Leidos has a beta of 0.56, suggesting that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

General Dynamics presently has a consensus price target of $388.20, suggesting a potential upside of 14.27%. Leidos has a consensus price target of $193.64, suggesting a potential upside of 56.29%. Given Leidos' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Leidos is more favorable than General Dynamics.

86.1% of General Dynamics shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.1% of Leidos shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of General Dynamics shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Leidos shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

General Dynamics pays an annual dividend of $6.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Leidos pays an annual dividend of $1.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. General Dynamics pays out 40.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Leidos pays out 15.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. General Dynamics has raised its dividend for 34 consecutive years and Leidos has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years. General Dynamics is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

86.1% of General Dynamics shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.8% of L3Harris Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of General Dynamics shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of L3Harris Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

General Dynamics has a net margin of 8.07% compared to L3Harris Technologies' net margin of 7.71%. General Dynamics' return on equity of 17.41% beat L3Harris Technologies' return on equity.

General Dynamics has higher revenue and earnings than L3Harris Technologies. General Dynamics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than L3Harris Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

General Dynamics has a beta of 0.34, suggesting that its share price is 66% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, L3Harris Technologies has a beta of 0.51, suggesting that its share price is 49% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, General Dynamics had 9 more articles in the media than L3Harris Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 28 mentions for General Dynamics and 19 mentions for L3Harris Technologies. L3Harris Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.09 beat General Dynamics' score of 0.95 indicating that L3Harris Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

General Dynamics pays an annual dividend of $6.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. L3Harris Technologies pays an annual dividend of $5.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. General Dynamics pays out 40.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. L3Harris Technologies pays out 54.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. General Dynamics has increased its dividend for 34 consecutive years and L3Harris Technologies has increased its dividend for 24 consecutive years. General Dynamics is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

General Dynamics currently has a consensus target price of $388.20, indicating a potential upside of 14.27%. L3Harris Technologies has a consensus target price of $354.75, indicating a potential upside of 16.10%. Given L3Harris Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe L3Harris Technologies is more favorable than General Dynamics.

General Dynamics pays an annual dividend of $6.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Lockheed Martin pays an annual dividend of $13.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. General Dynamics pays out 40.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Lockheed Martin pays out 66.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. General Dynamics has increased its dividend for 34 consecutive years and Lockheed Martin has increased its dividend for 22 consecutive years.

86.1% of General Dynamics shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 74.2% of Lockheed Martin shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of General Dynamics shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Lockheed Martin shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Lockheed Martin had 13 more articles in the media than General Dynamics. MarketBeat recorded 41 mentions for Lockheed Martin and 28 mentions for General Dynamics. General Dynamics' average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Lockheed Martin's score of 0.91 indicating that General Dynamics is being referred to more favorably in the media.

General Dynamics currently has a consensus target price of $388.20, indicating a potential upside of 14.27%. Lockheed Martin has a consensus target price of $628.63, indicating a potential upside of 21.47%. Given Lockheed Martin's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Lockheed Martin is more favorable than General Dynamics.

General Dynamics has a beta of 0.34, suggesting that its share price is 66% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lockheed Martin has a beta of 0.1, suggesting that its share price is 90% less volatile than the broader market.

Lockheed Martin has higher revenue and earnings than General Dynamics. General Dynamics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lockheed Martin, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

General Dynamics has a net margin of 8.07% compared to Lockheed Martin's net margin of 6.38%. Lockheed Martin's return on equity of 101.64% beat General Dynamics' return on equity.