Curtiss-Wright (CW) Competitors

92.6% of EMCOR Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.7% of Curtiss-Wright shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of EMCOR Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Curtiss-Wright shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

EMCOR Group currently has a consensus price target of $836.88, indicating a potential upside of 2.43%. Curtiss-Wright has a consensus price target of $746.67, indicating a potential upside of 1.69%. Given EMCOR Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe EMCOR Group is more favorable than Curtiss-Wright.

EMCOR Group has higher revenue and earnings than Curtiss-Wright. EMCOR Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Curtiss-Wright, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, EMCOR Group had 8 more articles in the media than Curtiss-Wright. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for EMCOR Group and 11 mentions for Curtiss-Wright. Curtiss-Wright's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat EMCOR Group's score of 1.20 indicating that Curtiss-Wright is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

EMCOR Group pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Curtiss-Wright pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. EMCOR Group pays out 5.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Curtiss-Wright pays out 7.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. EMCOR Group has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Curtiss-Wright has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years. EMCOR Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Curtiss-Wright has a net margin of 14.17% compared to EMCOR Group's net margin of 7.54%. EMCOR Group's return on equity of 35.19% beat Curtiss-Wright's return on equity.

EMCOR Group has a beta of 1.12, meaning that its share price is 12% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Curtiss-Wright has a beta of 0.85, meaning that its share price is 15% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Eaton had 3 more articles in the media than Curtiss-Wright. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Eaton and 11 mentions for Curtiss-Wright. Curtiss-Wright's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Eaton's score of 1.02 indicating that Curtiss-Wright is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Curtiss-Wright pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Eaton pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Curtiss-Wright pays out 7.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Eaton pays out 43.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Curtiss-Wright has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years.

Eaton has higher revenue and earnings than Curtiss-Wright. Eaton is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Curtiss-Wright, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Curtiss-Wright has a beta of 0.85, indicating that its stock price is 15% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Eaton has a beta of 1.2, indicating that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the broader market.

Curtiss-Wright currently has a consensus target price of $746.67, indicating a potential upside of 1.69%. Eaton has a consensus target price of $420.95, indicating a potential upside of 6.21%. Given Eaton's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Eaton is more favorable than Curtiss-Wright.

Curtiss-Wright has a net margin of 14.17% compared to Eaton's net margin of 13.99%. Eaton's return on equity of 24.72% beat Curtiss-Wright's return on equity.

82.7% of Curtiss-Wright shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.0% of Eaton shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Curtiss-Wright shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Eaton shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Curtiss-Wright has a net margin of 14.17% compared to Comfort Systems USA's net margin of 12.07%. Comfort Systems USA's return on equity of 51.69% beat Curtiss-Wright's return on equity.

Curtiss-Wright pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Comfort Systems USA pays an annual dividend of $3.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Curtiss-Wright pays out 7.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Comfort Systems USA pays out 9.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Curtiss-Wright has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years and Comfort Systems USA has raised its dividend for 13 consecutive years. Comfort Systems USA is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Comfort Systems USA had 27 more articles in the media than Curtiss-Wright. MarketBeat recorded 38 mentions for Comfort Systems USA and 11 mentions for Curtiss-Wright. Comfort Systems USA's average media sentiment score of 1.51 beat Curtiss-Wright's score of 1.27 indicating that Comfort Systems USA is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Curtiss-Wright presently has a consensus price target of $746.67, suggesting a potential upside of 1.69%. Comfort Systems USA has a consensus price target of $1,969.33, suggesting a potential upside of 6.94%. Given Comfort Systems USA's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Comfort Systems USA is more favorable than Curtiss-Wright.

Curtiss-Wright has a beta of 0.85, indicating that its stock price is 15% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Comfort Systems USA has a beta of 1.66, indicating that its stock price is 66% more volatile than the broader market.

Comfort Systems USA has higher revenue and earnings than Curtiss-Wright. Comfort Systems USA is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Curtiss-Wright, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

82.7% of Curtiss-Wright shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.5% of Comfort Systems USA shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Curtiss-Wright shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Comfort Systems USA shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Curtiss-Wright pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. GE Vernova pays an annual dividend of $2.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Curtiss-Wright pays out 7.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. GE Vernova pays out 5.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Curtiss-Wright has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years. GE Vernova is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

GE Vernova has a net margin of 23.81% compared to Curtiss-Wright's net margin of 14.17%. GE Vernova's return on equity of 43.97% beat Curtiss-Wright's return on equity.

Curtiss-Wright presently has a consensus target price of $746.67, suggesting a potential upside of 1.69%. GE Vernova has a consensus target price of $1,090.76, suggesting a potential upside of 16.63%. Given GE Vernova's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe GE Vernova is more favorable than Curtiss-Wright.

82.7% of Curtiss-Wright shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Curtiss-Wright shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of GE Vernova shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, GE Vernova had 65 more articles in the media than Curtiss-Wright. MarketBeat recorded 76 mentions for GE Vernova and 11 mentions for Curtiss-Wright. Curtiss-Wright's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat GE Vernova's score of 1.19 indicating that Curtiss-Wright is being referred to more favorably in the media.

GE Vernova has higher revenue and earnings than Curtiss-Wright. GE Vernova is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Curtiss-Wright, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Curtiss-Wright has a beta of 0.85, meaning that its share price is 15% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, GE Vernova has a beta of 1.24, meaning that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market.