Curtiss-Wright (CW) Competitors

Curtiss-Wright has a net margin of 14.81% compared to EMCOR Group's net margin of 7.74%. EMCOR Group's return on equity of 35.49% beat Curtiss-Wright's return on equity.

EMCOR Group pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Curtiss-Wright pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. EMCOR Group pays out 5.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Curtiss-Wright pays out 7.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. EMCOR Group has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Curtiss-Wright has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years. EMCOR Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, EMCOR Group and EMCOR Group both had 13 articles in the media. EMCOR Group's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Curtiss-Wright's score of 0.21 indicating that EMCOR Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

EMCOR Group has a beta of 1.12, indicating that its stock price is 12% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Curtiss-Wright has a beta of 0.88, indicating that its stock price is 12% less volatile than the broader market.

EMCOR Group presently has a consensus price target of $1,014.17, indicating a potential upside of 30.53%. Curtiss-Wright has a consensus price target of $746.88, indicating a potential upside of 46.89%. Given Curtiss-Wright's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Curtiss-Wright is more favorable than EMCOR Group.

92.6% of EMCOR Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.7% of Curtiss-Wright shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of EMCOR Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Curtiss-Wright shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

EMCOR Group has higher revenue and earnings than Curtiss-Wright. EMCOR Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Curtiss-Wright, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Eaton has a beta of 1.13, meaning that its stock price is 13% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Curtiss-Wright has a beta of 0.88, meaning that its stock price is 12% less volatile than the broader market.

83.0% of Eaton shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.7% of Curtiss-Wright shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Eaton shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Curtiss-Wright shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Eaton pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Curtiss-Wright pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Eaton pays out 44.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Curtiss-Wright pays out 7.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Curtiss-Wright has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years.

Eaton has higher revenue and earnings than Curtiss-Wright. Curtiss-Wright is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Eaton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Eaton presently has a consensus target price of $456.50, suggesting a potential upside of 7.67%. Curtiss-Wright has a consensus target price of $746.88, suggesting a potential upside of 46.89%. Given Curtiss-Wright's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Curtiss-Wright is more favorable than Eaton.

Curtiss-Wright has a net margin of 14.81% compared to Eaton's net margin of 12.75%. Eaton's return on equity of 24.58% beat Curtiss-Wright's return on equity.

In the previous week, Eaton had 8 more articles in the media than Curtiss-Wright. MarketBeat recorded 21 mentions for Eaton and 13 mentions for Curtiss-Wright. Eaton's average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Curtiss-Wright's score of 0.21 indicating that Eaton is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Comfort Systems USA has higher revenue and earnings than Curtiss-Wright. Curtiss-Wright is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Comfort Systems USA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Curtiss-Wright has a net margin of 14.81% compared to Comfort Systems USA's net margin of 12.77%. Comfort Systems USA's return on equity of 53.55% beat Curtiss-Wright's return on equity.

In the previous week, Comfort Systems USA had 1 more articles in the media than Curtiss-Wright. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Comfort Systems USA and 13 mentions for Curtiss-Wright. Comfort Systems USA's average media sentiment score of 0.50 beat Curtiss-Wright's score of 0.21 indicating that Comfort Systems USA is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Comfort Systems USA has a beta of 1.66, meaning that its stock price is 66% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Curtiss-Wright has a beta of 0.88, meaning that its stock price is 12% less volatile than the broader market.

Comfort Systems USA pays an annual dividend of $3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Curtiss-Wright pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Comfort Systems USA pays out 8.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Curtiss-Wright pays out 7.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Comfort Systems USA has increased its dividend for 13 consecutive years and Curtiss-Wright has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years. Comfort Systems USA is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Comfort Systems USA presently has a consensus price target of $2,082.86, suggesting a potential upside of 21.81%. Curtiss-Wright has a consensus price target of $746.88, suggesting a potential upside of 46.89%. Given Curtiss-Wright's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Curtiss-Wright is more favorable than Comfort Systems USA.

96.5% of Comfort Systems USA shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.7% of Curtiss-Wright shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of Comfort Systems USA shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Curtiss-Wright shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

GE Vernova has a beta of 1.14, meaning that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Curtiss-Wright has a beta of 0.88, meaning that its stock price is 12% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, GE Vernova had 17 more articles in the media than Curtiss-Wright. MarketBeat recorded 30 mentions for GE Vernova and 13 mentions for Curtiss-Wright. GE Vernova's average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Curtiss-Wright's score of 0.21 indicating that GE Vernova is being referred to more favorably in the media.

GE Vernova has a net margin of 23.03% compared to Curtiss-Wright's net margin of 14.81%. GE Vernova's return on equity of 42.42% beat Curtiss-Wright's return on equity.

GE Vernova has higher revenue and earnings than Curtiss-Wright. GE Vernova is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Curtiss-Wright, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

GE Vernova pays an annual dividend of $2.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Curtiss-Wright pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. GE Vernova pays out 5.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Curtiss-Wright pays out 7.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Curtiss-Wright has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years. Curtiss-Wright is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

GE Vernova presently has a consensus price target of $1,171.87, suggesting a potential upside of 17.34%. Curtiss-Wright has a consensus price target of $746.88, suggesting a potential upside of 46.89%. Given Curtiss-Wright's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Curtiss-Wright is more favorable than GE Vernova.

82.7% of Curtiss-Wright shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of GE Vernova shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Curtiss-Wright shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.