Go Pro

Curtiss-Wright (CW) Competitors

Curtiss-Wright logo
$567.03 -0.42 (-0.07%)
Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$568.05 +1.02 (+0.18%)
As of 07:34 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

CW vs. BWXT, EME, ETN, FIX, and GEV

Should you buy Curtiss-Wright stock or one of its competitors? Curtiss-Wright's main competitors and comparable companies include BWX Technologies (BWXT), EMCOR Group (EME), Eaton (ETN), Comfort Systems USA (FIX), and GE Vernova (GEV). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "industrials" sector.

How does Curtiss-Wright compare to BWX Technologies?

BWX Technologies (NYSE:BWXT) and Curtiss-Wright (NYSE:CW) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, BWX Technologies had 5 more articles in the media than Curtiss-Wright. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for BWX Technologies and 6 mentions for Curtiss-Wright. Curtiss-Wright's average media sentiment score of 1.13 beat BWX Technologies' score of 0.74 indicating that Curtiss-Wright is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
BWX Technologies
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Curtiss-Wright
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

BWX Technologies has a beta of 0.75, suggesting that its share price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Curtiss-Wright has a beta of 0.84, suggesting that its share price is 16% less volatile than the broader market.

Curtiss-Wright has a net margin of 14.81% compared to BWX Technologies' net margin of 10.11%. BWX Technologies' return on equity of 30.83% beat Curtiss-Wright's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
BWX Technologies10.11% 30.83% 9.34%
Curtiss-Wright 14.81%20.49%10.19%

BWX Technologies currently has a consensus price target of $217.92, indicating a potential upside of 47.94%. Curtiss-Wright has a consensus price target of $768.25, indicating a potential upside of 35.49%. Given BWX Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe BWX Technologies is more favorable than Curtiss-Wright.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
BWX Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80
Curtiss-Wright
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63

94.4% of BWX Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.7% of Curtiss-Wright shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of BWX Technologies shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Curtiss-Wright shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Curtiss-Wright has higher revenue and earnings than BWX Technologies. BWX Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Curtiss-Wright, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BWX Technologies$3.20B4.22$328.95M$3.8638.16
Curtiss-Wright$3.50B5.99$484.23M$14.5339.02

BWX Technologies pays an annual dividend of $1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Curtiss-Wright pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. BWX Technologies pays out 28.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Curtiss-Wright pays out 7.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. BWX Technologies has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Curtiss-Wright has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years.

Summary

Curtiss-Wright beats BWX Technologies on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Curtiss-Wright compare to EMCOR Group?

EMCOR Group (NYSE:EME) and Curtiss-Wright (NYSE:CW) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment and profitability.

In the previous week, EMCOR Group and EMCOR Group both had 6 articles in the media. Curtiss-Wright's average media sentiment score of 1.13 beat EMCOR Group's score of 0.74 indicating that Curtiss-Wright is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
EMCOR Group
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Curtiss-Wright
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

EMCOR Group presently has a consensus price target of $965.86, indicating a potential upside of 28.73%. Curtiss-Wright has a consensus price target of $768.25, indicating a potential upside of 35.49%. Given Curtiss-Wright's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Curtiss-Wright is more favorable than EMCOR Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
EMCOR Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Curtiss-Wright
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63

EMCOR Group has higher revenue and earnings than Curtiss-Wright. EMCOR Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Curtiss-Wright, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
EMCOR Group$18.60B1.78$1.27B$32.1523.34
Curtiss-Wright$3.50B5.99$484.23M$14.5339.02

Curtiss-Wright has a net margin of 14.81% compared to EMCOR Group's net margin of 7.74%. EMCOR Group's return on equity of 35.49% beat Curtiss-Wright's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
EMCOR Group7.74% 35.49% 14.12%
Curtiss-Wright 14.81%20.49%10.19%

92.6% of EMCOR Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.7% of Curtiss-Wright shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of EMCOR Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Curtiss-Wright shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

EMCOR Group pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Curtiss-Wright pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. EMCOR Group pays out 5.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Curtiss-Wright pays out 7.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. EMCOR Group has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Curtiss-Wright has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years. EMCOR Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

EMCOR Group has a beta of 1.13, suggesting that its stock price is 13% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Curtiss-Wright has a beta of 0.84, suggesting that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

EMCOR Group beats Curtiss-Wright on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Curtiss-Wright compare to Eaton?

Curtiss-Wright (NYSE:CW) and Eaton (NYSE:ETN) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

82.7% of Curtiss-Wright shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.0% of Eaton shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Curtiss-Wright shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Eaton shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Eaton has higher revenue and earnings than Curtiss-Wright. Curtiss-Wright is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Eaton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Curtiss-Wright$3.50B5.99$484.23M$14.5339.02
Eaton$30.03B5.50$4.09B$9.8343.24

Curtiss-Wright has a net margin of 14.81% compared to Eaton's net margin of 12.75%. Eaton's return on equity of 24.58% beat Curtiss-Wright's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Curtiss-Wright14.81% 20.49% 10.19%
Eaton 12.75%24.58%9.98%

Curtiss-Wright has a beta of 0.84, indicating that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Eaton has a beta of 1.17, indicating that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the broader market.

Curtiss-Wright pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Eaton pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Curtiss-Wright pays out 7.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Eaton pays out 44.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Curtiss-Wright has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Eaton had 10 more articles in the media than Curtiss-Wright. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Eaton and 6 mentions for Curtiss-Wright. Curtiss-Wright's average media sentiment score of 1.13 beat Eaton's score of 0.70 indicating that Curtiss-Wright is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Curtiss-Wright
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Eaton
7 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Curtiss-Wright presently has a consensus target price of $768.25, suggesting a potential upside of 35.49%. Eaton has a consensus target price of $451.63, suggesting a potential upside of 6.25%. Given Curtiss-Wright's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Curtiss-Wright is more favorable than Eaton.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Curtiss-Wright
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63
Eaton
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
14 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Eaton beats Curtiss-Wright on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Curtiss-Wright compare to Comfort Systems USA?

Comfort Systems USA (NYSE:FIX) and Curtiss-Wright (NYSE:CW) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Comfort Systems USA had 1 more articles in the media than Curtiss-Wright. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Comfort Systems USA and 6 mentions for Curtiss-Wright. Comfort Systems USA's average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat Curtiss-Wright's score of 1.13 indicating that Comfort Systems USA is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Comfort Systems USA
6 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Curtiss-Wright
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Comfort Systems USA presently has a consensus target price of $2,082.86, indicating a potential upside of 26.45%. Curtiss-Wright has a consensus target price of $768.25, indicating a potential upside of 35.49%. Given Curtiss-Wright's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Curtiss-Wright is more favorable than Comfort Systems USA.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Comfort Systems USA
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Curtiss-Wright
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63

Comfort Systems USA has higher revenue and earnings than Curtiss-Wright. Curtiss-Wright is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Comfort Systems USA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Comfort Systems USA$9.10B6.37$1.02B$40.6640.51
Curtiss-Wright$3.50B5.99$484.23M$14.5339.02

Curtiss-Wright has a net margin of 14.81% compared to Comfort Systems USA's net margin of 12.77%. Comfort Systems USA's return on equity of 53.55% beat Curtiss-Wright's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Comfort Systems USA12.77% 53.55% 20.75%
Curtiss-Wright 14.81%20.49%10.19%

Comfort Systems USA has a beta of 1.67, suggesting that its share price is 67% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Curtiss-Wright has a beta of 0.84, suggesting that its share price is 16% less volatile than the broader market.

96.5% of Comfort Systems USA shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.7% of Curtiss-Wright shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of Comfort Systems USA shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Curtiss-Wright shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Comfort Systems USA pays an annual dividend of $3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Curtiss-Wright pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Comfort Systems USA pays out 8.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Curtiss-Wright pays out 7.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Comfort Systems USA has increased its dividend for 13 consecutive years and Curtiss-Wright has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years. Comfort Systems USA is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Comfort Systems USA beats Curtiss-Wright on 16 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Curtiss-Wright compare to GE Vernova?

Curtiss-Wright (NYSE:CW) and GE Vernova (NYSE:GEV) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, profitability, valuation, risk, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Curtiss-Wright presently has a consensus price target of $768.25, suggesting a potential upside of 35.49%. GE Vernova has a consensus price target of $1,145.83, suggesting a potential upside of 21.99%. Given Curtiss-Wright's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Curtiss-Wright is more favorable than GE Vernova.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Curtiss-Wright
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63
GE Vernova
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
20 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.79

In the previous week, GE Vernova had 47 more articles in the media than Curtiss-Wright. MarketBeat recorded 53 mentions for GE Vernova and 6 mentions for Curtiss-Wright. Curtiss-Wright's average media sentiment score of 1.13 beat GE Vernova's score of 0.61 indicating that Curtiss-Wright is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Curtiss-Wright
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
GE Vernova
24 Very Positive mention(s)
10 Positive mention(s)
10 Neutral mention(s)
6 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Curtiss-Wright has a beta of 0.84, indicating that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, GE Vernova has a beta of 1.15, indicating that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the broader market.

GE Vernova has a net margin of 23.03% compared to Curtiss-Wright's net margin of 14.81%. GE Vernova's return on equity of 42.42% beat Curtiss-Wright's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Curtiss-Wright14.81% 20.49% 10.19%
GE Vernova 23.03%42.42%7.78%

82.7% of Curtiss-Wright shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Curtiss-Wright shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of GE Vernova shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Curtiss-Wright pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. GE Vernova pays an annual dividend of $2.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Curtiss-Wright pays out 7.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. GE Vernova pays out 5.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Curtiss-Wright has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years. GE Vernova is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

GE Vernova has higher revenue and earnings than Curtiss-Wright. GE Vernova is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Curtiss-Wright, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Curtiss-Wright$3.50B5.99$484.23M$14.5339.02
GE Vernova$41.37B6.05$4.88B$34.9426.88

Summary

GE Vernova beats Curtiss-Wright on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Curtiss-Wright News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CW and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CW and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CW vs. The Competition

MetricCurtiss-WrightAerospace & Defense IndustryIndustrials SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$20.94B$20.41B$10.21B$22.95B
Dividend Yield0.18%1.68%97.06%3.59%
P/E Ratio39.0237.4225.5328.22
Price / Sales5.9933.18387.4186.56
Price / Cash33.7626.2923.7733.29
Price / Book8.257.414.814.67
Net Income$484.23M$562.41M$614.63M$1.07B
7 Day Performance1.53%-1.28%1.20%-1.65%
1 Month Performance-18.29%-12.06%-3.35%-3.58%
1 Year Performance10.49%2.00%4.20%7.58%

Curtiss-Wright Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CW
Curtiss-Wright
4.7046 of 5 stars
$567.03
-0.1%
$768.25
+35.5%
+14.0%$20.96B$3.50B39.439,100
BWXT
BWX Technologies
4.6757 of 5 stars
$157.81
+0.1%
$220.27
+39.6%
-13.2%$14.44B$3.20B40.8810,400
EME
EMCOR Group
4.8132 of 5 stars
$753.90
0.0%
$965.86
+28.1%
+17.9%$33.27B$16.99B23.4544,000
ETN
Eaton
3.8006 of 5 stars
$411.08
+0.1%
$450.61
+9.6%
+12.8%$159.57B$27.45B41.8297,000
FIX
Comfort Systems USA
4.9124 of 5 stars
$1,611.87
+0.1%
$2,082.86
+29.2%
+106.5%$56.67B$9.10B39.6422,700

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:CW) was last updated on 9/18/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners