Go Pro

Curtiss-Wright (CW) Competitors

Curtiss-Wright logo
$597.28 -8.21 (-1.36%)
As of 08/28/2026 03:58 PM Eastern

CW vs. BWXT, EME, ETN, FIX, and GEV

Should you buy Curtiss-Wright stock or one of its competitors? Curtiss-Wright's main competitors and comparable companies include BWX Technologies (BWXT), EMCOR Group (EME), Eaton (ETN), Comfort Systems USA (FIX), and GE Vernova (GEV). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "industrials" sector.

How does Curtiss-Wright compare to BWX Technologies?

Curtiss-Wright (NYSE:CW) and BWX Technologies (NYSE:BWXT) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, earnings, risk, institutional ownership and valuation.

Curtiss-Wright has a beta of 0.87, meaning that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BWX Technologies has a beta of 0.76, meaning that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the broader market.

82.7% of Curtiss-Wright shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.4% of BWX Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Curtiss-Wright shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of BWX Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Curtiss-Wright has a net margin of 14.81% compared to BWX Technologies' net margin of 10.11%. BWX Technologies' return on equity of 30.83% beat Curtiss-Wright's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Curtiss-Wright14.81% 20.49% 10.19%
BWX Technologies 10.11%30.83%9.34%

Curtiss-Wright pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. BWX Technologies pays an annual dividend of $1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Curtiss-Wright pays out 7.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. BWX Technologies pays out 28.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Curtiss-Wright has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years and BWX Technologies has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Curtiss-Wright currently has a consensus price target of $782.50, indicating a potential upside of 31.01%. BWX Technologies has a consensus price target of $224.20, indicating a potential upside of 46.42%. Given BWX Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe BWX Technologies is more favorable than Curtiss-Wright.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Curtiss-Wright
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
BWX Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80

Curtiss-Wright has higher revenue and earnings than BWX Technologies. BWX Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Curtiss-Wright, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Curtiss-Wright$3.65B6.04$484.23M$14.5341.11
BWX Technologies$3.20B4.39$328.95M$3.8639.67

In the previous week, Curtiss-Wright had 10 more articles in the media than BWX Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 35 mentions for Curtiss-Wright and 25 mentions for BWX Technologies. BWX Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.46 beat Curtiss-Wright's score of 1.44 indicating that BWX Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Curtiss-Wright
33 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
BWX Technologies
23 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Curtiss-Wright beats BWX Technologies on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Curtiss-Wright compare to EMCOR Group?

Curtiss-Wright (NYSE:CW) and EMCOR Group (NYSE:EME) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, earnings and risk.

Curtiss-Wright presently has a consensus target price of $782.50, indicating a potential upside of 31.01%. EMCOR Group has a consensus target price of $965.86, indicating a potential upside of 30.37%. Given Curtiss-Wright's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Curtiss-Wright is more favorable than EMCOR Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Curtiss-Wright
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
EMCOR Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Curtiss-Wright had 5 more articles in the media than EMCOR Group. MarketBeat recorded 35 mentions for Curtiss-Wright and 30 mentions for EMCOR Group. EMCOR Group's average media sentiment score of 1.67 beat Curtiss-Wright's score of 1.44 indicating that EMCOR Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Curtiss-Wright
33 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
EMCOR Group
30 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

82.7% of Curtiss-Wright shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.6% of EMCOR Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Curtiss-Wright shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of EMCOR Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

EMCOR Group has higher revenue and earnings than Curtiss-Wright. EMCOR Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Curtiss-Wright, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Curtiss-Wright$3.65B6.04$484.23M$14.5341.11
EMCOR Group$16.99B1.92$1.27B$32.1523.04

Curtiss-Wright has a beta of 0.87, meaning that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, EMCOR Group has a beta of 1.14, meaning that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the broader market.

Curtiss-Wright pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. EMCOR Group pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Curtiss-Wright pays out 7.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. EMCOR Group pays out 5.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Curtiss-Wright has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years and EMCOR Group has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years. EMCOR Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Curtiss-Wright has a net margin of 14.81% compared to EMCOR Group's net margin of 7.74%. EMCOR Group's return on equity of 35.49% beat Curtiss-Wright's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Curtiss-Wright14.81% 20.49% 10.19%
EMCOR Group 7.74%35.49%14.12%

Summary

EMCOR Group beats Curtiss-Wright on 14 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Curtiss-Wright compare to Eaton?

Curtiss-Wright (NYSE:CW) and Eaton (NYSE:ETN) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, earnings and valuation.

Curtiss-Wright pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Eaton pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Curtiss-Wright pays out 7.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Eaton pays out 44.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Curtiss-Wright has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years.

Curtiss-Wright has a net margin of 14.81% compared to Eaton's net margin of 12.75%. Eaton's return on equity of 24.58% beat Curtiss-Wright's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Curtiss-Wright14.81% 20.49% 10.19%
Eaton 12.75%24.58%9.98%

82.7% of Curtiss-Wright shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.0% of Eaton shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Curtiss-Wright shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Eaton shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Curtiss-Wright had 9 more articles in the media than Eaton. MarketBeat recorded 35 mentions for Curtiss-Wright and 26 mentions for Eaton. Curtiss-Wright's average media sentiment score of 1.44 beat Eaton's score of 1.00 indicating that Curtiss-Wright is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Curtiss-Wright
33 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Eaton
16 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Curtiss-Wright has a beta of 0.87, meaning that its share price is 13% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Eaton has a beta of 1.18, meaning that its share price is 18% more volatile than the broader market.

Curtiss-Wright currently has a consensus price target of $782.50, suggesting a potential upside of 31.01%. Eaton has a consensus price target of $442.00, suggesting a potential upside of 9.80%. Given Curtiss-Wright's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Curtiss-Wright is more favorable than Eaton.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Curtiss-Wright
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Eaton
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
13 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.95

Eaton has higher revenue and earnings than Curtiss-Wright. Eaton is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Curtiss-Wright, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Curtiss-Wright$3.65B6.04$484.23M$14.5341.11
Eaton$27.45B5.70$4.09B$9.8340.95

Summary

Curtiss-Wright beats Eaton on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Curtiss-Wright compare to Comfort Systems USA?

Curtiss-Wright (NYSE:CW) and Comfort Systems USA (NYSE:FIX) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, earnings, valuation, dividends and analyst recommendations.

82.7% of Curtiss-Wright shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.5% of Comfort Systems USA shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Curtiss-Wright shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Comfort Systems USA shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Curtiss-Wright has a net margin of 14.81% compared to Comfort Systems USA's net margin of 12.77%. Comfort Systems USA's return on equity of 53.55% beat Curtiss-Wright's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Curtiss-Wright14.81% 20.49% 10.19%
Comfort Systems USA 12.77%53.55%20.75%

In the previous week, Comfort Systems USA had 15 more articles in the media than Curtiss-Wright. MarketBeat recorded 50 mentions for Comfort Systems USA and 35 mentions for Curtiss-Wright. Comfort Systems USA's average media sentiment score of 1.55 beat Curtiss-Wright's score of 1.44 indicating that Comfort Systems USA is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Curtiss-Wright
33 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Comfort Systems USA
47 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Curtiss-Wright pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Comfort Systems USA pays an annual dividend of $3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Curtiss-Wright pays out 7.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Comfort Systems USA pays out 8.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Curtiss-Wright has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years and Comfort Systems USA has increased its dividend for 13 consecutive years. Comfort Systems USA is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Curtiss-Wright has a beta of 0.87, meaning that its share price is 13% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Comfort Systems USA has a beta of 1.69, meaning that its share price is 69% more volatile than the broader market.

Curtiss-Wright currently has a consensus price target of $782.50, indicating a potential upside of 31.01%. Comfort Systems USA has a consensus price target of $2,082.86, indicating a potential upside of 37.20%. Given Comfort Systems USA's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Comfort Systems USA is more favorable than Curtiss-Wright.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Curtiss-Wright
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Comfort Systems USA
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Comfort Systems USA has higher revenue and earnings than Curtiss-Wright. Comfort Systems USA is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Curtiss-Wright, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Curtiss-Wright$3.65B6.04$484.23M$14.5341.11
Comfort Systems USA$9.10B5.87$1.02B$40.6637.34

Summary

Comfort Systems USA beats Curtiss-Wright on 16 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Curtiss-Wright compare to GE Vernova?

Curtiss-Wright (NYSE:CW) and GE Vernova (NYSE:GEV) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, earnings, risk, dividends, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Curtiss-Wright currently has a consensus price target of $782.50, indicating a potential upside of 31.01%. GE Vernova has a consensus price target of $1,133.15, indicating a potential upside of 24.21%. Given Curtiss-Wright's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Curtiss-Wright is more favorable than GE Vernova.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Curtiss-Wright
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
GE Vernova
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
22 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83

GE Vernova has higher revenue and earnings than Curtiss-Wright. GE Vernova is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Curtiss-Wright, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Curtiss-Wright$3.65B6.04$484.23M$14.5341.11
GE Vernova$38.07B6.38$4.88B$34.9426.11

Curtiss-Wright pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. GE Vernova pays an annual dividend of $2.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Curtiss-Wright pays out 7.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. GE Vernova pays out 5.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Curtiss-Wright has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years. GE Vernova is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Curtiss-Wright has a beta of 0.87, indicating that its share price is 13% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, GE Vernova has a beta of 1.21, indicating that its share price is 21% more volatile than the broader market.

82.7% of Curtiss-Wright shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Curtiss-Wright shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of GE Vernova shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, GE Vernova had 80 more articles in the media than Curtiss-Wright. MarketBeat recorded 115 mentions for GE Vernova and 35 mentions for Curtiss-Wright. GE Vernova's average media sentiment score of 1.49 beat Curtiss-Wright's score of 1.44 indicating that GE Vernova is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Curtiss-Wright
33 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
GE Vernova
101 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
10 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

GE Vernova has a net margin of 23.03% compared to Curtiss-Wright's net margin of 14.81%. GE Vernova's return on equity of 42.42% beat Curtiss-Wright's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Curtiss-Wright14.81% 20.49% 10.19%
GE Vernova 23.03%42.42%7.78%

Summary

GE Vernova beats Curtiss-Wright on 14 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Curtiss-Wright News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CW and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CW and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CW vs. The Competition

MetricCurtiss-WrightAerospace & Defense IndustryIndustrials SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$22.03B$22.11B$10.62B$24.21B
Dividend Yield0.17%1.64%97.13%3.71%
P/E Ratio41.1139.9126.3930.01
Price / Sales6.04147.07374.6519.55
Price / Cash35.8628.6024.5833.10
Price / Book7.966.304.437.67
Net Income$484.23M$566.76M$611.08M$1.07B
7 Day Performance-5.87%-3.38%-0.86%-0.32%
1 Month Performance-12.18%4.57%3.03%2.36%
1 Year Performance25.06%11.94%10.90%13.30%

Curtiss-Wright Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CW
Curtiss-Wright
4.4427 of 5 stars
$597.28
-1.4%
$782.50
+31.0%
+22.9%$22.03B$3.65B41.119,100
BWXT
BWX Technologies
4.6934 of 5 stars
$171.65
-0.9%
$227.20
+32.4%
-7.7%$15.87B$3.20B44.4710,400
EME
EMCOR Group
4.9805 of 5 stars
$863.28
+3.2%
$965.86
+11.9%
+17.1%$36.89B$16.99B26.8544,000
ETN
Eaton
4.7064 of 5 stars
$457.04
+1.2%
$431.78
-5.5%
+13.2%$175.37B$27.45B46.4997,000
FIX
Comfort Systems USA
4.9505 of 5 stars
$1,879.96
+6.0%
$2,057.86
+9.5%
+107.6%$62.44B$9.10B46.2422,700

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:CW) was last updated on 8/29/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners