Free Trial

Curtiss-Wright (CW) Competitors

Curtiss-Wright logo
$710.69 -2.03 (-0.29%)
Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$710.49 -0.20 (-0.03%)
As of 04:47 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

CW vs. BWXT, EME, ETN, FIX, and GEV

Should you buy Curtiss-Wright stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Curtiss-Wright with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Curtiss-Wright include BWX Technologies (BWXT), EMCOR Group (EME), Eaton (ETN), Comfort Systems USA (FIX), and GE Vernova (GEV).

How does Curtiss-Wright compare to BWX Technologies?

Curtiss-Wright (NYSE:CW) and BWX Technologies (NYSE:BWXT) are both large-cap aerospace companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and dividends.

Curtiss-Wright has a beta of 0.86, suggesting that its share price is 14% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BWX Technologies has a beta of 0.78, suggesting that its share price is 22% less volatile than the broader market.

Curtiss-Wright has a net margin of 14.17% compared to BWX Technologies' net margin of 10.20%. BWX Technologies' return on equity of 31.33% beat Curtiss-Wright's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Curtiss-Wright14.17% 20.00% 10.01%
BWX Technologies 10.20%31.33%9.62%

Curtiss-Wright pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. BWX Technologies pays an annual dividend of $1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Curtiss-Wright pays out 7.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. BWX Technologies pays out 28.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Curtiss-Wright has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years and BWX Technologies has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Curtiss-Wright has higher revenue and earnings than BWX Technologies. Curtiss-Wright is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than BWX Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Curtiss-Wright$3.50B7.50$484.23M$13.6552.06
BWX Technologies$3.20B5.79$328.95M$3.7454.05

Curtiss-Wright currently has a consensus target price of $746.67, indicating a potential upside of 5.06%. BWX Technologies has a consensus target price of $222.96, indicating a potential upside of 10.29%. Given BWX Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe BWX Technologies is more favorable than Curtiss-Wright.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Curtiss-Wright
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57
BWX Technologies
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75

82.7% of Curtiss-Wright shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.4% of BWX Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Curtiss-Wright shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of BWX Technologies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, BWX Technologies had 7 more articles in the media than Curtiss-Wright. MarketBeat recorded 21 mentions for BWX Technologies and 14 mentions for Curtiss-Wright. Curtiss-Wright's average media sentiment score of 1.09 beat BWX Technologies' score of 0.74 indicating that Curtiss-Wright is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Curtiss-Wright
8 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
BWX Technologies
12 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Curtiss-Wright and BWX Technologies tied by winning 10 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Curtiss-Wright compare to EMCOR Group?

EMCOR Group (NYSE:EME) and Curtiss-Wright (NYSE:CW) are related large-cap companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, valuation, dividends and profitability.

92.6% of EMCOR Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.7% of Curtiss-Wright shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of EMCOR Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Curtiss-Wright shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Curtiss-Wright has a net margin of 14.17% compared to EMCOR Group's net margin of 7.54%. EMCOR Group's return on equity of 35.19% beat Curtiss-Wright's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
EMCOR Group7.54% 35.19% 13.68%
Curtiss-Wright 14.17%20.00%10.01%

EMCOR Group pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Curtiss-Wright pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. EMCOR Group pays out 5.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Curtiss-Wright pays out 7.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. EMCOR Group has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Curtiss-Wright has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years. EMCOR Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

EMCOR Group has a beta of 1.17, meaning that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Curtiss-Wright has a beta of 0.86, meaning that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, EMCOR Group had 3 more articles in the media than Curtiss-Wright. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for EMCOR Group and 14 mentions for Curtiss-Wright. EMCOR Group's average media sentiment score of 1.42 beat Curtiss-Wright's score of 1.09 indicating that EMCOR Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
EMCOR Group
16 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Curtiss-Wright
8 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

EMCOR Group has higher revenue and earnings than Curtiss-Wright. EMCOR Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Curtiss-Wright, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
EMCOR Group$16.99B2.29$1.27B$29.8129.37
Curtiss-Wright$3.50B7.50$484.23M$13.6552.06

EMCOR Group currently has a consensus price target of $799.29, suggesting a potential downside of 8.71%. Curtiss-Wright has a consensus price target of $746.67, suggesting a potential upside of 5.06%. Given Curtiss-Wright's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Curtiss-Wright is more favorable than EMCOR Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
EMCOR Group
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.85
Curtiss-Wright
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57

Summary

EMCOR Group beats Curtiss-Wright on 15 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Curtiss-Wright compare to Eaton?

Curtiss-Wright (NYSE:CW) and Eaton (NYSE:ETN) are related large-cap companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk and dividends.

Curtiss-Wright has a net margin of 14.17% compared to Eaton's net margin of 13.99%. Eaton's return on equity of 24.72% beat Curtiss-Wright's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Curtiss-Wright14.17% 20.00% 10.01%
Eaton 13.99%24.72%10.69%

Curtiss-Wright pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Eaton pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Curtiss-Wright pays out 7.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Eaton pays out 43.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Curtiss-Wright has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years.

Eaton has higher revenue and earnings than Curtiss-Wright. Eaton is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Curtiss-Wright, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Curtiss-Wright$3.50B7.50$484.23M$13.6552.06
Eaton$28.52B5.20$4.09B$10.2337.34

82.7% of Curtiss-Wright shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.0% of Eaton shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Curtiss-Wright shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Eaton shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Eaton had 7 more articles in the media than Curtiss-Wright. MarketBeat recorded 21 mentions for Eaton and 14 mentions for Curtiss-Wright. Eaton's average media sentiment score of 1.18 beat Curtiss-Wright's score of 1.09 indicating that Eaton is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Curtiss-Wright
8 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Eaton
14 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Curtiss-Wright presently has a consensus price target of $746.67, suggesting a potential upside of 5.06%. Eaton has a consensus price target of $420.95, suggesting a potential upside of 10.21%. Given Eaton's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Eaton is more favorable than Curtiss-Wright.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Curtiss-Wright
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57
Eaton
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
15 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86

Curtiss-Wright has a beta of 0.86, indicating that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Eaton has a beta of 1.24, indicating that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Eaton beats Curtiss-Wright on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Curtiss-Wright compare to Comfort Systems USA?

Curtiss-Wright (NYSE:CW) and Comfort Systems USA (NYSE:FIX) are related large-cap companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, risk, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and dividends.

Curtiss-Wright pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Comfort Systems USA pays an annual dividend of $3.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Curtiss-Wright pays out 7.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Comfort Systems USA pays out 9.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Curtiss-Wright has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years and Comfort Systems USA has increased its dividend for 13 consecutive years. Comfort Systems USA is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Curtiss-Wright has a net margin of 14.17% compared to Comfort Systems USA's net margin of 12.07%. Comfort Systems USA's return on equity of 51.69% beat Curtiss-Wright's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Curtiss-Wright14.17% 20.00% 10.01%
Comfort Systems USA 12.07%51.69%20.21%

Curtiss-Wright currently has a consensus target price of $746.67, indicating a potential upside of 5.06%. Comfort Systems USA has a consensus target price of $1,923.20, indicating a potential upside of 3.86%. Given Curtiss-Wright's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Curtiss-Wright is more favorable than Comfort Systems USA.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Curtiss-Wright
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57
Comfort Systems USA
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.78

82.7% of Curtiss-Wright shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.5% of Comfort Systems USA shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Curtiss-Wright shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Comfort Systems USA shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Comfort Systems USA had 17 more articles in the media than Curtiss-Wright. MarketBeat recorded 31 mentions for Comfort Systems USA and 14 mentions for Curtiss-Wright. Comfort Systems USA's average media sentiment score of 1.34 beat Curtiss-Wright's score of 1.09 indicating that Comfort Systems USA is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Curtiss-Wright
8 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Comfort Systems USA
23 Very Positive mention(s)
5 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Comfort Systems USA has higher revenue and earnings than Curtiss-Wright. Curtiss-Wright is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Comfort Systems USA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Curtiss-Wright$3.50B7.50$484.23M$13.6552.06
Comfort Systems USA$9.10B7.16$1.02B$34.6653.43

Curtiss-Wright has a beta of 0.86, meaning that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Comfort Systems USA has a beta of 1.7, meaning that its stock price is 70% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Comfort Systems USA beats Curtiss-Wright on 15 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Curtiss-Wright compare to GE Vernova?

GE Vernova (NYSE:GEV) and Curtiss-Wright (NYSE:CW) are related large-cap companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

GE Vernova pays an annual dividend of $2.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Curtiss-Wright pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. GE Vernova pays out 5.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Curtiss-Wright pays out 7.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Curtiss-Wright has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years. GE Vernova is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

GE Vernova has a net margin of 23.81% compared to Curtiss-Wright's net margin of 14.17%. GE Vernova's return on equity of 43.97% beat Curtiss-Wright's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
GE Vernova23.81% 43.97% 8.40%
Curtiss-Wright 14.17%20.00%10.01%

GE Vernova currently has a consensus price target of $1,090.76, suggesting a potential upside of 7.61%. Curtiss-Wright has a consensus price target of $746.67, suggesting a potential upside of 5.06%. Given GE Vernova's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe GE Vernova is more favorable than Curtiss-Wright.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
GE Vernova
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
22 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.90
Curtiss-Wright
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57

82.7% of Curtiss-Wright shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of GE Vernova shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Curtiss-Wright shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, GE Vernova had 38 more articles in the media than Curtiss-Wright. MarketBeat recorded 52 mentions for GE Vernova and 14 mentions for Curtiss-Wright. GE Vernova's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Curtiss-Wright's score of 1.09 indicating that GE Vernova is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
GE Vernova
40 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Curtiss-Wright
8 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

GE Vernova has higher revenue and earnings than Curtiss-Wright. GE Vernova is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Curtiss-Wright, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
GE Vernova$38.07B7.16$4.88B$34.3329.53
Curtiss-Wright$3.50B7.50$484.23M$13.6552.06

GE Vernova has a beta of 1.51, suggesting that its stock price is 51% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Curtiss-Wright has a beta of 0.86, suggesting that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

GE Vernova beats Curtiss-Wright on 14 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Curtiss-Wright News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CW and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CW and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CW vs. The Competition

MetricCurtiss-WrightAEROSP/DEF EQ IndustryAerospace SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$26.25B$20.28B$29.26B$22.83B
Dividend Yield0.13%0.66%0.92%4.12%
P/E Ratio52.0761.7545.5029.90
Price / Sales7.508.5241.2092.37
Price / Cash42.2136.4927.4918.80
Price / Book10.348.788.114.59
Net Income$484.23M$516.51M$907.04M$1.07B
7 Day Performance-2.52%-1.72%-2.39%-1.35%
1 Month Performance-3.52%-2.41%-4.76%-1.29%
1 Year Performance73.32%47.82%39.75%21.89%

Curtiss-Wright Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CW
Curtiss-Wright
3.5542 of 5 stars
$710.69
-0.3%
$746.67
+5.1%
+74.4%$26.25B$3.50B52.079,100
BWXT
BWX Technologies
4.2755 of 5 stars
$211.39
+3.0%
$217.96
+3.1%
+86.3%$18.81B$3.20B56.5210,400
EME
EMCOR Group
3.8686 of 5 stars
$931.42
+1.1%
$799.29
-14.2%
+93.9%$40.96B$16.99B31.2544,000
ETN
Eaton
4.6933 of 5 stars
$419.07
+4.4%
$420.95
+0.4%
+21.4%$155.91B$27.45B40.9697,000
FIX
Comfort Systems USA
4.238 of 5 stars
$2,028.74
+3.9%
$1,923.20
-5.2%
+321.7%$68.73B$9.10B58.5322,700

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:CW) was last updated on 5/18/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners