EEX vs. FLL, POWW, CNTY, UTI, SKLZ, JAKK, WEYS, GDHG, AGS, and EM
Should you be buying Emerald stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Emerald include Full House Resorts (FLL), AMMO (POWW), Century Casinos (CNTY), Universal Technical Institute (UTI), Skillz (SKLZ), JAKKS Pacific (JAKK), Weyco Group (WEYS), Golden Heaven Group (GDHG), PlayAGS (AGS), and Smart Share Global (EM). These companies are all part of the "consumer discretionary" sector.
Emerald vs.
Emerald (NYSE:EEX) and Full House Resorts (NASDAQ:FLL) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, community ranking, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.
18.1% of Emerald shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 43.9% of Full House Resorts shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.9% of Emerald shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 10.9% of Full House Resorts shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.
Emerald has higher revenue and earnings than Full House Resorts. Full House Resorts is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Emerald, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Emerald has a net margin of 34.83% compared to Full House Resorts' net margin of -15.31%. Full House Resorts' return on equity of -26.02% beat Emerald's return on equity.
Emerald currently has a consensus price target of $12.00, indicating a potential upside of 209.28%. Full House Resorts has a consensus price target of $15.00, indicating a potential upside of 108.04%. Given Emerald's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Emerald is more favorable than Full House Resorts.
Emerald received 24 more outperform votes than Full House Resorts when rated by MarketBeat users. However, 63.82% of users gave Full House Resorts an outperform vote while only 58.39% of users gave Emerald an outperform vote.
Emerald has a beta of 1.25, meaning that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Full House Resorts has a beta of 1.79, meaning that its stock price is 79% more volatile than the S&P 500.
In the previous week, Emerald had 2 more articles in the media than Full House Resorts. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Emerald and 2 mentions for Full House Resorts. Emerald's average media sentiment score of 0.06 beat Full House Resorts' score of -0.67 indicating that Emerald is being referred to more favorably in the media.
Summary
Emerald beats Full House Resorts on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.
New MarketBeat Followers Over Time
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding EEX and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Media Sentiment Over Time
This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Related Companies and Tools
