NYSE:EEX

Emerald Competitors

$5.35
+0.15 (+2.88 %)
(As of 04/14/2021 04:00 PM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$5.27
Now: $5.35
$5.43
50-Day Range
$4.91
MA: $5.91
$7.14
52-Week Range
$1.50
Now: $5.35
$7.28
Volume1,906 shs
Average Volume207,544 shs
Market Capitalization$386.67 million
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta1.93

Competitors

Emerald (NYSE:EEX) Vs. CNDT, RDWR, GSKY, TRHC, QNST, and IIIV

Should you be buying EEX stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "business services, not elsewhere classified" are considered alternatives and competitors to Emerald, including Conduent (CNDT), Radware (RDWR), GreenSky (GSKY), Tabula Rasa HealthCare (TRHC), QuinStreet (QNST), and i3 Verticals (IIIV).

Emerald (NYSE:EEX) and Conduent (NASDAQ:CNDT) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings and risk.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Emerald and Conduent, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Emerald04002.00
Conduent01102.50

Emerald presently has a consensus price target of $3.9850, indicating a potential downside of 25.51%. Conduent has a consensus price target of $6.00, indicating a potential downside of 12.41%. Given Conduent's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Conduent is more favorable than Emerald.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

27.9% of Emerald shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.9% of Conduent shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Emerald shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Conduent shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Emerald and Conduent's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Emerald-402.06%8.30%2.74%
Conduent-16.35%11.40%3.16%

Volatility & Risk

Emerald has a beta of 1.93, suggesting that its share price is 93% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Conduent has a beta of 1.92, suggesting that its share price is 92% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Emerald and Conduent's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Emerald$360.90 million1.07$-50,000,000.00$0.856.29
Conduent$4.47 billion0.33$-1,934,000,000.00$0.6211.06

Emerald has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Conduent. Emerald is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Conduent, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Conduent beats Emerald on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Emerald (NYSE:EEX) and Radware (NASDAQ:RDWR) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, dividends, valuation and earnings.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Emerald and Radware's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Emerald$360.90 million1.07$-50,000,000.00$0.856.29
Radware$252.07 million5.27$22.57 million$0.5749.68

Radware has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Emerald. Emerald is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Radware, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings for Emerald and Radware, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Emerald04002.00
Radware03202.40

Emerald presently has a consensus target price of $3.9850, suggesting a potential downside of 25.51%. Radware has a consensus target price of $30.00, suggesting a potential upside of 6.08%. Given Radware's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Radware is more favorable than Emerald.

Volatility & Risk

Emerald has a beta of 1.93, suggesting that its share price is 93% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Radware has a beta of 0.97, suggesting that its share price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Emerald and Radware's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Emerald-402.06%8.30%2.74%
Radware5.70%4.87%3.12%

Insider and Institutional Ownership

27.9% of Emerald shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 70.5% of Radware shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Emerald shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 21.6% of Radware shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Radware beats Emerald on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

GreenSky (NASDAQ:GSKY) and Emerald (NYSE:EEX) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares GreenSky and Emerald's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
GreenSky0.72%-15.29%2.19%
Emerald-402.06%8.30%2.74%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for GreenSky and Emerald, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
GreenSky44001.50
Emerald04002.00

GreenSky presently has a consensus price target of $4.0938, suggesting a potential downside of 33.87%. Emerald has a consensus price target of $3.9850, suggesting a potential downside of 25.51%. Given Emerald's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Emerald is more favorable than GreenSky.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

35.5% of GreenSky shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.9% of Emerald shares are held by institutional investors. 54.8% of GreenSky shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Emerald shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility & Risk

GreenSky has a beta of 1.67, suggesting that its stock price is 67% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Emerald has a beta of 1.93, suggesting that its stock price is 93% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares GreenSky and Emerald's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
GreenSky$529.65 million2.14$31.98 million$0.5710.88
Emerald$360.90 million1.07$-50,000,000.00$0.856.29

GreenSky has higher revenue and earnings than Emerald. Emerald is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than GreenSky, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

GreenSky beats Emerald on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Emerald (NYSE:EEX) and Tabula Rasa HealthCare (NASDAQ:TRHC) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations and risk.

Profitability

This table compares Emerald and Tabula Rasa HealthCare's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Emerald-402.06%8.30%2.74%
Tabula Rasa HealthCare-19.48%-11.53%-4.22%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Emerald and Tabula Rasa HealthCare, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Emerald04002.00
Tabula Rasa HealthCare06302.33

Emerald presently has a consensus target price of $3.9850, indicating a potential downside of 25.51%. Tabula Rasa HealthCare has a consensus target price of $52.20, indicating a potential upside of 18.47%. Given Tabula Rasa HealthCare's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Tabula Rasa HealthCare is more favorable than Emerald.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Emerald and Tabula Rasa HealthCare's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Emerald$360.90 million1.07$-50,000,000.00$0.856.29
Tabula Rasa HealthCare$284.71 million3.81$-32,440,000.00($0.25)-175.68

Tabula Rasa HealthCare has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Emerald. Tabula Rasa HealthCare is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Emerald, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

Emerald has a beta of 1.93, suggesting that its share price is 93% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Tabula Rasa HealthCare has a beta of 1.05, suggesting that its share price is 5% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

27.9% of Emerald shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Emerald shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 11.6% of Tabula Rasa HealthCare shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Emerald (NYSE:EEX) and QuinStreet (NASDAQ:QNST) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Risk and Volatility

Emerald has a beta of 1.93, indicating that its share price is 93% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, QuinStreet has a beta of 1.1, indicating that its share price is 10% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and price targets for Emerald and QuinStreet, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Emerald04002.00
QuinStreet00203.00

Emerald presently has a consensus price target of $3.9850, indicating a potential downside of 25.51%. QuinStreet has a consensus price target of $26.00, indicating a potential upside of 29.94%. Given QuinStreet's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe QuinStreet is more favorable than Emerald.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

27.9% of Emerald shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.6% of QuinStreet shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Emerald shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.0% of QuinStreet shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Emerald and QuinStreet's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Emerald$360.90 million1.07$-50,000,000.00$0.856.29
QuinStreet$490.34 million2.17$18.10 million$0.3458.65

QuinStreet has higher revenue and earnings than Emerald. Emerald is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than QuinStreet, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Emerald and QuinStreet's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Emerald-402.06%8.30%2.74%
QuinStreet6.29%12.51%8.58%

Summary

QuinStreet beats Emerald on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Emerald (NYSE:EEX) and i3 Verticals (NASDAQ:IIIV) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, valuation, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares Emerald and i3 Verticals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Emerald-402.06%8.30%2.74%
i3 Verticals-0.28%10.30%5.09%

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Emerald and i3 Verticals' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Emerald$360.90 million1.07$-50,000,000.00$0.856.29
i3 Verticals$150.13 million6.97$-420,000.00$0.5163.84

i3 Verticals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Emerald. Emerald is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than i3 Verticals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

Emerald has a beta of 1.93, meaning that its share price is 93% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, i3 Verticals has a beta of 1.62, meaning that its share price is 62% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Emerald and i3 Verticals, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Emerald04002.00
i3 Verticals10612.88

Emerald presently has a consensus price target of $3.9850, indicating a potential downside of 25.51%. i3 Verticals has a consensus price target of $37.25, indicating a potential upside of 13.78%. Given i3 Verticals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe i3 Verticals is more favorable than Emerald.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

27.9% of Emerald shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.1% of i3 Verticals shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Emerald shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 40.1% of i3 Verticals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

i3 Verticals beats Emerald on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.


Emerald Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Conduent logo
CNDT
Conduent
1.1$6.86+1.9%$1.43 billion$4.47 billion-2.09
Radware logo
RDWR
Radware
1.5$28.32+1.8%$1.30 billion$252.07 million97.66Analyst Upgrade
Unusual Options Activity
GreenSky logo
GSKY
GreenSky
1.3$6.20+1.1%$1.12 billion$529.65 million124.02
Tabula Rasa HealthCare logo
TRHC
Tabula Rasa HealthCare
1.3$43.92+0.2%$1.09 billion$284.71 million-16.51
QuinStreet logo
QNST
QuinStreet
2.0$19.94+0.3%$1.07 billion$490.34 million33.80Decrease in Short Interest
i3 Verticals logo
IIIV
i3 Verticals
1.7$32.56+0.4%$1.04 billion$150.13 million-814.00
Gravity logo
GRVY
Gravity
0.7$124.02+2.4%$882.52 million$307.18 million21.38Decrease in Short Interest
OptimizeRx logo
OPRX
OptimizeRx
1.5$50.22+2.3%$863.88 million$24.60 million-132.16Analyst Report
News Coverage
Viad logo
VVI
Viad
1.1$41.30+0.8%$839.39 million$1.37 billion-4.35
Advantage Solutions logo
ADV
Advantage Solutions
1.7$12.80+1.3%$732.24 millionN/A0.00
Qiwi logo
QIWI
Qiwi
1.7$10.78+1.6%$686.71 million$635.40 million7.05Analyst Upgrade
Rimini Street logo
RMNI
Rimini Street
1.7$8.57+0.5%$662.20 million$281.05 million-32.96News Coverage
Cass Information Systems logo
CASS
Cass Information Systems
0.9$46.02+0.5%$659.10 million$157.24 million26.76Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Ideanomics logo
IDEX
Ideanomics
0.6$2.73+0.7%$647.61 million$44.57 million-2.31Analyst Report
Gap Up
Liquidity Services logo
LQDT
Liquidity Services
1.3$18.03+0.3%$631.41 million$205.94 million-163.91Increase in Short Interest
Newtek Business Services logo
NEWT
Newtek Business Services
1.4$27.14+1.3%$615.55 million$59.29 million18.21Decrease in Short Interest
International Money Express logo
IMXI
International Money Express
2.0$14.62+1.0%$564.48 million$319.60 million18.74
MoneyGram International logo
MGI
MoneyGram International
1.4$6.88+0.4%$531.41 million$1.29 billion-18.11
Priority Technology logo
PRTH
Priority Technology
1.7$7.01+2.1%$484.29 million$371.85 million25.04
Resources Connection logo
RGP
Resources Connection
1.5$14.36+1.5%$459.99 million$703.35 million37.79
Limelight Networks logo
LLNW
Limelight Networks
1.8$3.56+2.8%$454.33 million$200.63 million-59.33Decrease in Short Interest
Digital Media Solutions logo
DMS
Digital Media Solutions
1.3$12.05+2.6%$400.38 millionN/A0.00Analyst Report
News Coverage
Gap Up
UXIN
Uxin
0.5$1.24+1.6%$372.82 million$227.64 million-0.72
Waitr logo
WTRH
Waitr
1.6$2.80+0.4%$311.15 million$191.68 million-0.90
QH
Quhuo
0.7$5.64+1.6%$297.42 million$295.30 million0.00Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
comScore logo
SCOR
comScore
2.0$3.34+0.0%$253.13 million$388.64 million-4.12
Points International logo
PCOM
Points International
1.1$15.07+0.6%$226.11 million$401.18 million-94.18Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
PaySign logo
PAYS
PaySign
1.1$4.10+0.7%$208.35 million$34.67 million-68.33
MOGU logo
MOGU
MOGU
1.8$1.89+2.6%$177.26 million$117.97 million-0.73Increase in Short Interest
Gap Up
DHI Group logo
DHX
DHI Group
2.0$3.19+3.1%$161.72 million$149.37 million-5.41
PFSweb logo
PFSW
PFSweb
1.4$7.22+2.4%$143.71 million$294.02 million-60.16Gap Down
ServiceSource International logo
SREV
ServiceSource International
1.8$1.40+1.4%$138.17 million$216.13 million-6.67News Coverage
36Kr logo
KRKR
36Kr
1.3$3.18+2.8%$122.61 million$94.17 million-5.68Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
Exela Technologies logo
XELA
Exela Technologies
0.8$2.01+1.0%$119.71 million$1.56 billion-0.59Increase in Short Interest
Marchex logo
MCHX
Marchex
1.8$2.91+0.0%$115.15 million$106.13 million-4.10Insider Buying
Gap Down
China Customer Relations Centers logo
CCRC
China Customer Relations Centers
0.5$6.28+0.3%$114.75 million$173.41 million0.00Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Steel Connect logo
STCN
Steel Connect
0.6$1.85+3.2%$112.77 million$782.81 million-7.12Unusual Options Activity
MKD
Molecular Data
0.0$0.94+4.5%$112.72 million$1.90 billion0.00News Coverage
HGBL
Heritage Global
2.1$3.11+3.5%$106.07 million$26.17 million23.92Decrease in Short Interest
TC
TuanChe
0.7$4.01+0.5%$80.24 million$92.62 million-3.13Earnings Announcement
Analyst Downgrade
Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
NCTY
The9
0.5$23.58+7.6%$77.16 million$50,000.000.00Gap Down
RSSS
Research Solutions
0.0$2.40+1.3%$63.86 million$31.06 million-80.00Increase in Short Interest
ALJJ
ALJ Regional
0.6$1.41+6.4%$63.48 million$389.15 million-0.88Gap Up
BSQUARE logo
BSQR
BSQUARE
0.5$2.96+2.7%$40.43 million$59.28 million-12.87Increase in Short Interest
Gap Up
The OLB Group logo
OLB
The OLB Group
1.4$5.48+0.4%$39.13 million$10.29 million0.00Decrease in Short Interest
Gap Down
SPAR Group logo
SGRP
SPAR Group
0.7$1.70+7.1%$38.68 million$252.88 million56.67Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Gap Up
SilverSun Technologies logo
SSNT
SilverSun Technologies
0.6$6.84+9.6%$37.96 million$38.50 million0.00Increase in Short Interest
Cypress Environmental Partners logo
CELP
Cypress Environmental Partners
1.3$2.25+4.4%$26.51 million$401.65 million-32.14Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
CREG
China Recycling Energy
0.5$7.56+5.4%$22.34 million$870,000.000.00Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
This page was last updated on 4/14/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.