Emerald Competitors

Emerald (NYSE:EEX) and Conduent (NASDAQ:CNDT) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings and risk.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Emerald and Conduent, as reported by MarketBeat.

Emerald presently has a consensus price target of $3.9850, indicating a potential downside of 25.51%. Conduent has a consensus price target of $6.00, indicating a potential downside of 12.41%. Given Conduent's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Conduent is more favorable than Emerald.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

27.9% of Emerald shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.9% of Conduent shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Emerald shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Conduent shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Emerald and Conduent's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility & Risk

Emerald has a beta of 1.93, suggesting that its share price is 93% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Conduent has a beta of 1.92, suggesting that its share price is 92% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Emerald and Conduent's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Emerald has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Conduent. Emerald is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Conduent, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Conduent beats Emerald on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Emerald (NYSE:EEX) and Radware (NASDAQ:RDWR) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, dividends, valuation and earnings.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Emerald and Radware's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Radware has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Emerald. Emerald is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Radware, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings for Emerald and Radware, as reported by MarketBeat.

Emerald presently has a consensus target price of $3.9850, suggesting a potential downside of 25.51%. Radware has a consensus target price of $30.00, suggesting a potential upside of 6.08%. Given Radware's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Radware is more favorable than Emerald.

Volatility & Risk

Emerald has a beta of 1.93, suggesting that its share price is 93% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Radware has a beta of 0.97, suggesting that its share price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Emerald and Radware's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

27.9% of Emerald shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 70.5% of Radware shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Emerald shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 21.6% of Radware shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Radware beats Emerald on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

GreenSky (NASDAQ:GSKY) and Emerald (NYSE:EEX) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares GreenSky and Emerald's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for GreenSky and Emerald, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

GreenSky presently has a consensus price target of $4.0938, suggesting a potential downside of 33.87%. Emerald has a consensus price target of $3.9850, suggesting a potential downside of 25.51%. Given Emerald's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Emerald is more favorable than GreenSky.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

35.5% of GreenSky shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.9% of Emerald shares are held by institutional investors. 54.8% of GreenSky shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Emerald shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility & Risk

GreenSky has a beta of 1.67, suggesting that its stock price is 67% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Emerald has a beta of 1.93, suggesting that its stock price is 93% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares GreenSky and Emerald's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

GreenSky has higher revenue and earnings than Emerald. Emerald is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than GreenSky, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

GreenSky beats Emerald on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Emerald (NYSE:EEX) and Tabula Rasa HealthCare (NASDAQ:TRHC) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations and risk.

Profitability

This table compares Emerald and Tabula Rasa HealthCare's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Emerald and Tabula Rasa HealthCare, as reported by MarketBeat.

Emerald presently has a consensus target price of $3.9850, indicating a potential downside of 25.51%. Tabula Rasa HealthCare has a consensus target price of $52.20, indicating a potential upside of 18.47%. Given Tabula Rasa HealthCare's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Tabula Rasa HealthCare is more favorable than Emerald.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Emerald and Tabula Rasa HealthCare's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Tabula Rasa HealthCare has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Emerald. Tabula Rasa HealthCare is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Emerald, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

Emerald has a beta of 1.93, suggesting that its share price is 93% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Tabula Rasa HealthCare has a beta of 1.05, suggesting that its share price is 5% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

27.9% of Emerald shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Emerald shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 11.6% of Tabula Rasa HealthCare shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Emerald (NYSE:EEX) and QuinStreet (NASDAQ:QNST) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Risk and Volatility

Emerald has a beta of 1.93, indicating that its share price is 93% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, QuinStreet has a beta of 1.1, indicating that its share price is 10% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and price targets for Emerald and QuinStreet, as provided by MarketBeat.

Emerald presently has a consensus price target of $3.9850, indicating a potential downside of 25.51%. QuinStreet has a consensus price target of $26.00, indicating a potential upside of 29.94%. Given QuinStreet's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe QuinStreet is more favorable than Emerald.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

27.9% of Emerald shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.6% of QuinStreet shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Emerald shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.0% of QuinStreet shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Emerald and QuinStreet's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

QuinStreet has higher revenue and earnings than Emerald. Emerald is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than QuinStreet, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Emerald and QuinStreet's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

QuinStreet beats Emerald on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Emerald (NYSE:EEX) and i3 Verticals (NASDAQ:IIIV) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, valuation, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares Emerald and i3 Verticals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Emerald and i3 Verticals' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

i3 Verticals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Emerald. Emerald is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than i3 Verticals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

Emerald has a beta of 1.93, meaning that its share price is 93% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, i3 Verticals has a beta of 1.62, meaning that its share price is 62% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Emerald and i3 Verticals, as reported by MarketBeat.

Emerald presently has a consensus price target of $3.9850, indicating a potential downside of 25.51%. i3 Verticals has a consensus price target of $37.25, indicating a potential upside of 13.78%. Given i3 Verticals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe i3 Verticals is more favorable than Emerald.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

27.9% of Emerald shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.1% of i3 Verticals shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Emerald shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 40.1% of i3 Verticals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

i3 Verticals beats Emerald on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.