SPX FLOW Competitors

Illinois Tool Works (NYSE:ITW) and SPX FLOW (NYSE:FLOW) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, valuation, risk, profitability and institutional ownership.

Volatility and Risk

Illinois Tool Works has a beta of 1.07, indicating that its stock price is 7% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, SPX FLOW has a beta of 1.96, indicating that its stock price is 96% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Illinois Tool Works pays an annual dividend of $4.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. SPX FLOW pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Illinois Tool Works pays out 58.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. SPX FLOW pays out 19.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Illinois Tool Works has increased its dividend for 50 consecutive years. Illinois Tool Works is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Illinois Tool Works and SPX FLOW, as reported by MarketBeat.

Illinois Tool Works currently has a consensus target price of $210.1250, suggesting a potential downside of 5.44%. SPX FLOW has a consensus target price of $52.6667, suggesting a potential downside of 18.35%. Given Illinois Tool Works' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Illinois Tool Works is more favorable than SPX FLOW.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

77.4% of Illinois Tool Works shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.9% of SPX FLOW shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Illinois Tool Works shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of SPX FLOW shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Illinois Tool Works and SPX FLOW's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Illinois Tool Works and SPX FLOW's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Illinois Tool Works has higher revenue and earnings than SPX FLOW. Illinois Tool Works is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SPX FLOW, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Illinois Tool Works beats SPX FLOW on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Parker-Hannifin (NYSE:PH) and SPX FLOW (NYSE:FLOW) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, valuation, risk, profitability and institutional ownership.

Volatility and Risk

Parker-Hannifin has a beta of 1.74, indicating that its stock price is 74% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, SPX FLOW has a beta of 1.96, indicating that its stock price is 96% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Parker-Hannifin pays an annual dividend of $3.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. SPX FLOW pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Parker-Hannifin pays out 32.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. SPX FLOW pays out 19.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Parker-Hannifin has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Parker-Hannifin is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Parker-Hannifin and SPX FLOW, as reported by MarketBeat.

Parker-Hannifin currently has a consensus target price of $317.8462, suggesting a potential upside of 2.61%. SPX FLOW has a consensus target price of $52.6667, suggesting a potential downside of 18.35%. Given Parker-Hannifin's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Parker-Hannifin is more favorable than SPX FLOW.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

77.4% of Parker-Hannifin shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.9% of SPX FLOW shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Parker-Hannifin shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of SPX FLOW shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Parker-Hannifin and SPX FLOW's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Parker-Hannifin and SPX FLOW's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Parker-Hannifin has higher revenue and earnings than SPX FLOW. Parker-Hannifin is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SPX FLOW, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Parker-Hannifin beats SPX FLOW on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Stanley Black & Decker (NYSE:SWK) and SPX FLOW (NYSE:FLOW) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, valuation, risk, profitability and institutional ownership.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Stanley Black & Decker and SPX FLOW, as reported by MarketBeat.

Stanley Black & Decker currently has a consensus target price of $195.00, suggesting a potential downside of 3.92%. SPX FLOW has a consensus target price of $52.6667, suggesting a potential downside of 18.35%. Given Stanley Black & Decker's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Stanley Black & Decker is more favorable than SPX FLOW.

Volatility and Risk

Stanley Black & Decker has a beta of 1.47, indicating that its stock price is 47% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, SPX FLOW has a beta of 1.96, indicating that its stock price is 96% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Stanley Black & Decker and SPX FLOW's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Stanley Black & Decker has higher revenue and earnings than SPX FLOW. Stanley Black & Decker is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SPX FLOW, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Stanley Black & Decker pays an annual dividend of $2.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. SPX FLOW pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Stanley Black & Decker pays out 33.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. SPX FLOW pays out 19.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Stanley Black & Decker has increased its dividend for 54 consecutive years. Stanley Black & Decker is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Profitability

This table compares Stanley Black & Decker and SPX FLOW's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

85.4% of Stanley Black & Decker shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.9% of SPX FLOW shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Stanley Black & Decker shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of SPX FLOW shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Stanley Black & Decker beats SPX FLOW on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

SPX FLOW (NYSE:FLOW) and Ingersoll Rand (NYSE:IR) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, dividends and valuation.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

94.9% of SPX FLOW shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.9% of Ingersoll Rand shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of SPX FLOW shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Ingersoll Rand shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

SPX FLOW has a beta of 1.96, indicating that its share price is 96% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ingersoll Rand has a beta of 1.53, indicating that its share price is 53% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for SPX FLOW and Ingersoll Rand, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

SPX FLOW currently has a consensus price target of $52.6667, suggesting a potential downside of 18.35%. Ingersoll Rand has a consensus price target of $50.0909, suggesting a potential upside of 0.67%. Given Ingersoll Rand's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Ingersoll Rand is more favorable than SPX FLOW.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares SPX FLOW and Ingersoll Rand's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Ingersoll Rand has higher revenue and earnings than SPX FLOW. SPX FLOW is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ingersoll Rand, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares SPX FLOW and Ingersoll Rand's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Ingersoll Rand beats SPX FLOW on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

SPX FLOW (NYSE:FLOW) and Dover (NYSE:DOV) are both industrial products companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, institutional ownership and earnings.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for SPX FLOW and Dover, as provided by MarketBeat.

SPX FLOW currently has a consensus price target of $52.6667, suggesting a potential downside of 18.35%. Dover has a consensus price target of $132.25, suggesting a potential downside of 8.52%. Given Dover's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Dover is more favorable than SPX FLOW.

Dividends

SPX FLOW pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Dover pays an annual dividend of $1.98 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. SPX FLOW pays out 19.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Dover pays out 33.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Dover has raised its dividend for 59 consecutive years. Dover is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Profitability

This table compares SPX FLOW and Dover's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

94.9% of SPX FLOW shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.7% of Dover shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of SPX FLOW shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Dover shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

SPX FLOW has a beta of 1.96, suggesting that its stock price is 96% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Dover has a beta of 1.3, suggesting that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares SPX FLOW and Dover's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Dover has higher revenue and earnings than SPX FLOW. Dover is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SPX FLOW, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Dover beats SPX FLOW on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

SPX FLOW (NYSE:FLOW) and Xylem (NYSE:XYL) are both industrial products companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability and risk.

Risk and Volatility

SPX FLOW has a beta of 1.96, suggesting that its share price is 96% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Xylem has a beta of 1.05, suggesting that its share price is 5% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

94.9% of SPX FLOW shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.9% of Xylem shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of SPX FLOW shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Xylem shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

SPX FLOW pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Xylem pays an annual dividend of $1.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. SPX FLOW pays out 19.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Xylem pays out 37.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Xylem has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Xylem is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for SPX FLOW and Xylem, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

SPX FLOW currently has a consensus price target of $52.6667, suggesting a potential downside of 18.35%. Xylem has a consensus price target of $87.50, suggesting a potential downside of 18.19%. Given Xylem's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Xylem is more favorable than SPX FLOW.

Profitability

This table compares SPX FLOW and Xylem's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares SPX FLOW and Xylem's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Xylem has higher revenue and earnings than SPX FLOW. SPX FLOW is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Xylem, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Xylem beats SPX FLOW on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.