NYSE:FLOW

SPX FLOW Competitors

$64.59
-1.88 (-2.83 %)
(As of 04/20/2021 11:57 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$64.50
Now: $64.59
$66.14
50-Day Range
$61.32
MA: $65.39
$69.28
52-Week Range
$24.65
Now: $64.59
$70.00
Volume1,096 shs
Average Volume210,830 shs
Market Capitalization$2.75 billion
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend Yield0.54%
Beta1.96

Competitors

SPX FLOW (NYSE:FLOW) Vs. ITW, PH, SWK, IR, DOV, and XYL

Should you be buying FLOW stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "industrial machinery" are considered alternatives and competitors to SPX FLOW, including Illinois Tool Works (ITW), Parker-Hannifin (PH), Stanley Black & Decker (SWK), Ingersoll Rand (IR), Dover (DOV), and Xylem (XYL).

Illinois Tool Works (NYSE:ITW) and SPX FLOW (NYSE:FLOW) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, valuation, risk, profitability and institutional ownership.

Volatility and Risk

Illinois Tool Works has a beta of 1.07, indicating that its stock price is 7% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, SPX FLOW has a beta of 1.96, indicating that its stock price is 96% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Illinois Tool Works pays an annual dividend of $4.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. SPX FLOW pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Illinois Tool Works pays out 58.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. SPX FLOW pays out 19.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Illinois Tool Works has increased its dividend for 50 consecutive years. Illinois Tool Works is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Illinois Tool Works and SPX FLOW, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Illinois Tool Works111402.19
SPX FLOW23202.00

Illinois Tool Works currently has a consensus target price of $210.1250, suggesting a potential downside of 5.44%. SPX FLOW has a consensus target price of $52.6667, suggesting a potential downside of 18.35%. Given Illinois Tool Works' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Illinois Tool Works is more favorable than SPX FLOW.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

77.4% of Illinois Tool Works shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.9% of SPX FLOW shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Illinois Tool Works shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of SPX FLOW shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Illinois Tool Works and SPX FLOW's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Illinois Tool Works16.77%80.95%14.37%
SPX FLOW-12.43%5.91%2.39%

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Illinois Tool Works and SPX FLOW's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Illinois Tool Works$14.11 billion4.98$2.52 billion$7.7528.66
SPX FLOW$1.51 billion1.82$-95,100,000.00$1.8734.54

Illinois Tool Works has higher revenue and earnings than SPX FLOW. Illinois Tool Works is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SPX FLOW, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Illinois Tool Works beats SPX FLOW on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Parker-Hannifin (NYSE:PH) and SPX FLOW (NYSE:FLOW) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, valuation, risk, profitability and institutional ownership.

Volatility and Risk

Parker-Hannifin has a beta of 1.74, indicating that its stock price is 74% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, SPX FLOW has a beta of 1.96, indicating that its stock price is 96% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Parker-Hannifin pays an annual dividend of $3.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. SPX FLOW pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Parker-Hannifin pays out 32.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. SPX FLOW pays out 19.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Parker-Hannifin has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Parker-Hannifin is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Parker-Hannifin and SPX FLOW, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Parker-Hannifin011202.92
SPX FLOW23202.00

Parker-Hannifin currently has a consensus target price of $317.8462, suggesting a potential upside of 2.61%. SPX FLOW has a consensus target price of $52.6667, suggesting a potential downside of 18.35%. Given Parker-Hannifin's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Parker-Hannifin is more favorable than SPX FLOW.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

77.4% of Parker-Hannifin shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.9% of SPX FLOW shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Parker-Hannifin shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of SPX FLOW shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Parker-Hannifin and SPX FLOW's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Parker-Hannifin8.75%22.77%7.13%
SPX FLOW-12.43%5.91%2.39%

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Parker-Hannifin and SPX FLOW's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Parker-Hannifin$13.70 billion2.93$1.21 billion$10.7928.83
SPX FLOW$1.51 billion1.82$-95,100,000.00$1.8734.54

Parker-Hannifin has higher revenue and earnings than SPX FLOW. Parker-Hannifin is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SPX FLOW, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Parker-Hannifin beats SPX FLOW on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Stanley Black & Decker (NYSE:SWK) and SPX FLOW (NYSE:FLOW) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, valuation, risk, profitability and institutional ownership.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Stanley Black & Decker and SPX FLOW, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Stanley Black & Decker04802.67
SPX FLOW23202.00

Stanley Black & Decker currently has a consensus target price of $195.00, suggesting a potential downside of 3.92%. SPX FLOW has a consensus target price of $52.6667, suggesting a potential downside of 18.35%. Given Stanley Black & Decker's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Stanley Black & Decker is more favorable than SPX FLOW.

Volatility and Risk

Stanley Black & Decker has a beta of 1.47, indicating that its stock price is 47% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, SPX FLOW has a beta of 1.96, indicating that its stock price is 96% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Stanley Black & Decker and SPX FLOW's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Stanley Black & Decker$14.44 billion2.26$955.80 million$8.4024.15
SPX FLOW$1.51 billion1.82$-95,100,000.00$1.8734.54

Stanley Black & Decker has higher revenue and earnings than SPX FLOW. Stanley Black & Decker is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SPX FLOW, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Stanley Black & Decker pays an annual dividend of $2.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. SPX FLOW pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Stanley Black & Decker pays out 33.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. SPX FLOW pays out 19.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Stanley Black & Decker has increased its dividend for 54 consecutive years. Stanley Black & Decker is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Profitability

This table compares Stanley Black & Decker and SPX FLOW's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Stanley Black & Decker6.98%15.05%5.46%
SPX FLOW-12.43%5.91%2.39%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

85.4% of Stanley Black & Decker shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.9% of SPX FLOW shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Stanley Black & Decker shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of SPX FLOW shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Stanley Black & Decker beats SPX FLOW on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

SPX FLOW (NYSE:FLOW) and Ingersoll Rand (NYSE:IR) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, dividends and valuation.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

94.9% of SPX FLOW shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.9% of Ingersoll Rand shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of SPX FLOW shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Ingersoll Rand shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

SPX FLOW has a beta of 1.96, indicating that its share price is 96% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ingersoll Rand has a beta of 1.53, indicating that its share price is 53% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for SPX FLOW and Ingersoll Rand, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
SPX FLOW23202.00
Ingersoll Rand04702.64

SPX FLOW currently has a consensus price target of $52.6667, suggesting a potential downside of 18.35%. Ingersoll Rand has a consensus price target of $50.0909, suggesting a potential upside of 0.67%. Given Ingersoll Rand's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Ingersoll Rand is more favorable than SPX FLOW.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares SPX FLOW and Ingersoll Rand's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
SPX FLOW$1.51 billion1.82$-95,100,000.00$1.8734.54
Ingersoll Rand$2.45 billion8.51$159.10 million$0.7665.59

Ingersoll Rand has higher revenue and earnings than SPX FLOW. SPX FLOW is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ingersoll Rand, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares SPX FLOW and Ingersoll Rand's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
SPX FLOW-12.43%5.91%2.39%
Ingersoll Rand-3.97%-2.27%-1.25%

Summary

Ingersoll Rand beats SPX FLOW on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

SPX FLOW (NYSE:FLOW) and Dover (NYSE:DOV) are both industrial products companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, institutional ownership and earnings.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for SPX FLOW and Dover, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
SPX FLOW23202.00
Dover05402.44

SPX FLOW currently has a consensus price target of $52.6667, suggesting a potential downside of 18.35%. Dover has a consensus price target of $132.25, suggesting a potential downside of 8.52%. Given Dover's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Dover is more favorable than SPX FLOW.

Dividends

SPX FLOW pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Dover pays an annual dividend of $1.98 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. SPX FLOW pays out 19.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Dover pays out 33.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Dover has raised its dividend for 59 consecutive years. Dover is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Profitability

This table compares SPX FLOW and Dover's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
SPX FLOW-12.43%5.91%2.39%
Dover10.02%26.73%9.24%

Insider & Institutional Ownership

94.9% of SPX FLOW shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.7% of Dover shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of SPX FLOW shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Dover shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

SPX FLOW has a beta of 1.96, suggesting that its stock price is 96% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Dover has a beta of 1.3, suggesting that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares SPX FLOW and Dover's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
SPX FLOW$1.51 billion1.82$-95,100,000.00$1.8734.54
Dover$7.14 billion2.91$677.92 million$5.9324.34

Dover has higher revenue and earnings than SPX FLOW. Dover is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SPX FLOW, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Dover beats SPX FLOW on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

SPX FLOW (NYSE:FLOW) and Xylem (NYSE:XYL) are both industrial products companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability and risk.

Risk and Volatility

SPX FLOW has a beta of 1.96, suggesting that its share price is 96% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Xylem has a beta of 1.05, suggesting that its share price is 5% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

94.9% of SPX FLOW shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.9% of Xylem shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of SPX FLOW shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Xylem shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

SPX FLOW pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Xylem pays an annual dividend of $1.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. SPX FLOW pays out 19.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Xylem pays out 37.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Xylem has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Xylem is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for SPX FLOW and Xylem, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
SPX FLOW23202.00
Xylem28302.08

SPX FLOW currently has a consensus price target of $52.6667, suggesting a potential downside of 18.35%. Xylem has a consensus price target of $87.50, suggesting a potential downside of 18.19%. Given Xylem's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Xylem is more favorable than SPX FLOW.

Profitability

This table compares SPX FLOW and Xylem's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
SPX FLOW-12.43%5.91%2.39%
Xylem5.09%14.72%5.44%

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares SPX FLOW and Xylem's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
SPX FLOW$1.51 billion1.82$-95,100,000.00$1.8734.54
Xylem$5.25 billion3.67$401 million$3.0235.37

Xylem has higher revenue and earnings than SPX FLOW. SPX FLOW is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Xylem, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Xylem beats SPX FLOW on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.


SPX FLOW Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Illinois Tool Works logo
ITW
Illinois Tool Works
2.5$222.10-0.8%$70.84 billion$14.11 billion33.65Analyst Report
News Coverage
Parker-Hannifin logo
PH
Parker-Hannifin
2.1$311.03-2.1%$40.99 billion$13.70 billion34.03Analyst Report
Stanley Black & Decker logo
SWK
Stanley Black & Decker
2.3$202.83-1.5%$33.13 billion$14.44 billion32.93Analyst Report
News Coverage
Ingersoll Rand logo
IR
Ingersoll Rand
1.2$49.85-2.1%$21.32 billion$2.45 billion-134.73Analyst Report
News Coverage
Dover logo
DOV
Dover
2.1$144.36-2.7%$20.20 billion$7.14 billion31.38Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
Gap Down
Xylem logo
XYL
Xylem
1.7$106.81-1.3%$19.52 billion$5.25 billion76.84Increase in Short Interest
IDEX logo
IEX
IDEX
1.8$220.44-0.3%$16.69 billion$2.49 billion45.08Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Report
Snap-on logo
SNA
Snap-on
2.3$234.01-0.9%$12.85 billion$3.73 billion21.87Upcoming Earnings
Graco logo
GGG
Graco
1.8$75.54-0.3%$12.80 billion$1.65 billion43.41Upcoming Earnings
News Coverage
Nordson logo
NDSN
Nordson
2.1$206.41-0.2%$11.96 billion$2.12 billion48.34Decrease in Short Interest
Pentair logo
PNR
Pentair
2.0$63.13-1.4%$10.63 billion$2.96 billion30.06Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Report
News Coverage
The Middleby logo
MIDD
The Middleby
1.4$166.93-1.0%$9.38 billion$2.96 billion34.92
ITT logo
ITT
ITT
1.6$91.59-0.9%$8.00 billion$2.85 billion52.64Analyst Report
Woodward logo
WWD
Woodward
1.5$119.57-2.9%$7.76 billion$2.90 billion30.82
Donaldson logo
DCI
Donaldson
1.9$60.08-1.0%$7.65 billion$2.58 billion30.34Analyst Report
Lincoln Electric logo
LECO
Lincoln Electric
2.0$125.23-0.0%$7.48 billion$3.00 billion37.27Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Report
News Coverage
The Timken logo
TKR
The Timken
2.2$81.58-2.3%$6.34 billion$3.79 billion18.05Analyst Report
News Coverage
Colfax logo
CFX
Colfax
1.4$43.99-2.1%$6.08 billion$3.33 billion-879.80Analyst Report
Rexnord logo
RXN
Rexnord
1.8$48.20-1.5%$5.88 billion$2.07 billion37.66Decrease in Short Interest
Crane logo
CR
Crane
1.9$91.89-1.7%$5.43 billion$3.28 billion241.82
Flowserve logo
FLS
Flowserve
1.7$38.94-2.7%$5.21 billion$3.94 billion39.33News Coverage
Valmont Industries logo
VMI
Valmont Industries
1.8$231.34-2.1%$5.02 billion$2.77 billion35.32Upcoming Earnings
News Coverage
Chart Industries logo
GTLS
Chart Industries
1.4$129.77-5.6%$4.98 billion$1.30 billion74.15Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Report
News Coverage
RBC Bearings logo
ROLL
RBC Bearings
1.3$192.53-1.9%$4.93 billion$727.46 million44.77Analyst Revision
News Coverage
John Bean Technologies logo
JBT
John Bean Technologies
1.5$132.10-1.8%$4.27 billion$1.95 billion35.13Upcoming Earnings
News Coverage
Altra Industrial Motion logo
AIMC
Altra Industrial Motion
1.4$60.66-3.1%$4.05 billion$1.83 billion-202.19
Watts Water Technologies logo
WTS
Watts Water Technologies
1.7$119.30-0.9%$4.05 billion$1.60 billion35.09
Kennametal logo
KMT
Kennametal
1.3$39.75-4.8%$3.48 billion$1.89 billion-96.95Analyst Report
News Coverage
Proto Labs logo
PRLB
Proto Labs
1.1$102.94-0.4%$2.86 billion$458.73 million49.02
Albany International logo
AIN
Albany International
1.5$84.99-3.2%$2.83 billion$1.05 billion27.50Upcoming Earnings
ESCO Technologies logo
ESE
ESCO Technologies
1.5$107.59-0.9%$2.83 billion$732.91 million27.52
Mueller Industries logo
MLI
Mueller Industries
2.3$44.39-0.5%$2.55 billion$2.43 billion19.05News Coverage
Gap Down
Barnes Group logo
B
Barnes Group
1.8$49.00-2.7%$2.55 billion$1.49 billion28.99
Mueller Water Products logo
MWA
Mueller Water Products
2.1$13.85-1.7%$2.23 billion$964.10 million30.78News Coverage
Kadant logo
KAI
Kadant
1.8$178.00-0.7%$2.08 billion$704.64 million43.10
EnPro Industries logo
NPO
EnPro Industries
2.4$82.57-2.8%$1.75 billion$1.21 billion8.73News Coverage
Tennant logo
TNC
Tennant
1.6$78.61-1.8%$1.49 billion$1.14 billion34.63
Omega Flex logo
OFLX
Omega Flex
0.7$144.59-0.1%$1.46 billion$111.36 million79.88Upcoming Earnings
Decrease in Short Interest
Gap Up
Harsco logo
HSC
Harsco
1.7$17.50-5.0%$1.45 billion$1.50 billion72.92
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling logo
HY
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling
1.1$80.49-3.7%$1.40 billion$3.29 billion49.69News Coverage
Gap Up
TriMas logo
TRS
TriMas
1.1$30.65-0.9%$1.34 billion$723.53 million-20.03
Columbus McKinnon logo
CMCO
Columbus McKinnon
1.8$52.23-2.4%$1.28 billion$809.16 million71.55
Standex International logo
SXI
Standex International
2.0$92.93-2.7%$1.18 billion$604.53 million65.44Decrease in Short Interest
Energy Recovery logo
ERII
Energy Recovery
1.0$18.01-3.4%$1.06 billion$86.94 million45.03Analyst Upgrade
News Coverage
Piedmont Lithium logo
PLL
Piedmont Lithium
1.1$63.23-4.3%$1.04 billionN/A-92.99
DMC Global logo
BOOM
DMC Global
1.1$53.38-6.0%$893.57 million$397.55 million-136.87Upcoming Earnings
The Gorman-Rupp logo
GRC
The Gorman-Rupp
1.1$33.06-1.9%$879.61 million$398.18 million32.10Upcoming Earnings
CIRCOR International logo
CIR
CIRCOR International
1.5$32.59-3.7%$681.75 million$964.31 million-3.84
Lydall logo
LDL
Lydall
1.1$31.12-2.5%$574.79 million$837.40 million-3.74News Coverage
The ExOne logo
XONE
The ExOne
1.4$22.52-1.4%$503.95 million$53.28 million-25.59Gap Up
This page was last updated on 4/20/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.