Harris (HRS) Competitors

Harris pays an annual dividend of $2.74 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Motorola Solutions pays an annual dividend of $4.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Harris pays out 42.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Motorola Solutions pays out 37.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Motorola Solutions has raised its dividend for 13 consecutive years. Motorola Solutions is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Motorola Solutions has higher revenue and earnings than Harris. Motorola Solutions is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Harris, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Motorola Solutions has a net margin of 18.44% compared to Harris' net margin of 13.60%. Motorola Solutions' return on equity of 110.75% beat Harris' return on equity.

Motorola Solutions has a consensus price target of $502.50, suggesting a potential upside of 15.95%. Given Motorola Solutions' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Motorola Solutions is more favorable than Harris.

96.7% of Harris shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.2% of Motorola Solutions shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.5% of Harris shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Motorola Solutions shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Motorola Solutions had 16 more articles in the media than Harris. MarketBeat recorded 21 mentions for Motorola Solutions and 5 mentions for Harris. Motorola Solutions' average media sentiment score of 1.21 beat Harris' score of 0.00 indicating that Motorola Solutions is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Harris has a beta of 0.98, meaning that its share price is 2% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Motorola Solutions has a beta of 0.93, meaning that its share price is 7% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Harris has higher revenue and earnings than Ciena. Harris is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ciena, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Harris has a net margin of 13.60% compared to Ciena's net margin of 4.47%. Harris' return on equity of 27.13% beat Ciena's return on equity.

Ciena has a consensus price target of $367.56, suggesting a potential downside of 36.27%. Given Ciena's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Ciena is more favorable than Harris.

96.7% of Harris shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.0% of Ciena shares are held by institutional investors. 2.5% of Harris shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Ciena shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Ciena had 27 more articles in the media than Harris. MarketBeat recorded 32 mentions for Ciena and 5 mentions for Harris. Ciena's average media sentiment score of 0.74 beat Harris' score of 0.00 indicating that Ciena is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Harris has a beta of 0.98, suggesting that its stock price is 2% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ciena has a beta of 1.24, suggesting that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Harris has a net margin of 13.60% compared to EchoStar's net margin of -96.62%. Harris' return on equity of 27.13% beat EchoStar's return on equity.

EchoStar currently has a consensus price target of $134.17, suggesting a potential upside of 6.69%. Given EchoStar's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe EchoStar is more favorable than Harris.

In the previous week, EchoStar had 14 more articles in the media than Harris. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for EchoStar and 5 mentions for Harris. EchoStar's average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat Harris' score of 0.00 indicating that EchoStar is being referred to more favorably in the media.

33.6% of EchoStar shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.7% of Harris shares are owned by institutional investors. 55.9% of EchoStar shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.5% of Harris shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Harris has lower revenue, but higher earnings than EchoStar. EchoStar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Harris, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

EchoStar has a beta of 0.95, indicating that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Harris has a beta of 0.98, indicating that its stock price is 2% less volatile than the S&P 500.

F5 has a net margin of 21.96% compared to Harris' net margin of 13.60%. Harris' return on equity of 27.13% beat F5's return on equity.

F5 currently has a consensus price target of $316.44, suggesting a potential downside of 7.21%. Given F5's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe F5 is more favorable than Harris.

In the previous week, F5 had 22 more articles in the media than Harris. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for F5 and 5 mentions for Harris. F5's average media sentiment score of 0.56 beat Harris' score of 0.00 indicating that F5 is being referred to more favorably in the media.

90.7% of F5 shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.7% of Harris shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of F5 shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.5% of Harris shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Harris has higher revenue and earnings than F5. F5 is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Harris, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

F5 has a beta of 1, indicating that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.Comparatively, Harris has a beta of 0.98, indicating that its stock price is 2% less volatile than the S&P 500.