F5 (FFIV) Competitors

F5 has higher revenue and earnings than Lumentum. Lumentum is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than F5, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

F5 has a net margin of 21.95% compared to Lumentum's net margin of -230.15%. Lumentum's return on equity of 26.34% beat F5's return on equity.

90.7% of F5 shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.1% of Lumentum shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of F5 shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Lumentum shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

F5 presently has a consensus target price of $416.63, suggesting a potential upside of 1.19%. Lumentum has a consensus target price of $1,053.83, suggesting a potential upside of 13.68%. Given Lumentum's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Lumentum is more favorable than F5.

In the previous week, Lumentum had 29 more articles in the media than F5. MarketBeat recorded 40 mentions for Lumentum and 11 mentions for F5. F5's average media sentiment score of 1.40 beat Lumentum's score of 0.87 indicating that F5 is being referred to more favorably in the media.

F5 has a beta of 1.03, meaning that its share price is 3% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lumentum has a beta of 1.53, meaning that its share price is 53% more volatile than the broader market.

Nokia presently has a consensus price target of $13.83, indicating a potential upside of 24.08%. F5 has a consensus price target of $416.63, indicating a potential upside of 1.19%. Given Nokia's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Nokia is more favorable than F5.

F5 has a net margin of 21.95% compared to Nokia's net margin of 3.49%. F5's return on equity of 21.54% beat Nokia's return on equity.

Nokia has a beta of 1.21, indicating that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, F5 has a beta of 1.03, indicating that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Nokia had 6 more articles in the media than F5. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Nokia and 11 mentions for F5. F5's average media sentiment score of 1.40 beat Nokia's score of 0.63 indicating that F5 is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

5.3% of Nokia shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.7% of F5 shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of F5 shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Nokia has higher revenue and earnings than F5. F5 is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nokia, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

F5 presently has a consensus target price of $416.63, suggesting a potential upside of 1.19%. Ciena has a consensus target price of $475.68, suggesting a potential upside of 36.31%. Given Ciena's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Ciena is more favorable than F5.

F5 has a beta of 1.03, suggesting that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ciena has a beta of 1.3, suggesting that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market.

90.7% of F5 shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.0% of Ciena shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of F5 shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Ciena shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

F5 has a net margin of 21.95% compared to Ciena's net margin of 10.87%. Ciena's return on equity of 25.33% beat F5's return on equity.

In the previous week, Ciena had 26 more articles in the media than F5. MarketBeat recorded 37 mentions for Ciena and 11 mentions for F5. F5's average media sentiment score of 1.40 beat Ciena's score of 0.89 indicating that F5 is being referred to more favorably in the media.

F5 has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Ciena. F5 is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ciena, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

4.0% of Ubiquiti shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.7% of F5 shares are held by institutional investors. 93.1% of Ubiquiti shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of F5 shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Ubiquiti presently has a consensus price target of $734.50, suggesting a potential upside of 30.85%. F5 has a consensus price target of $416.63, suggesting a potential upside of 1.19%. Given Ubiquiti's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Ubiquiti is more favorable than F5.

Ubiquiti has higher earnings, but lower revenue than F5. F5 is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ubiquiti, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Ubiquiti has a net margin of 29.33% compared to F5's net margin of 21.95%. Ubiquiti's return on equity of 85.57% beat F5's return on equity.

In the previous week, F5 had 7 more articles in the media than Ubiquiti. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for F5 and 4 mentions for Ubiquiti. F5's average media sentiment score of 1.40 beat Ubiquiti's score of 0.34 indicating that F5 is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Ubiquiti has a beta of 1.31, indicating that its stock price is 31% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, F5 has a beta of 1.03, indicating that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the broader market.