Go Pro

Harmonic (HLIT) Competitors

Harmonic logo
$12.40 -0.60 (-4.58%)
As of 10:15 AM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

HLIT vs. AUDC, CLFD, ANET, OOMA, and EXTR

Should you buy Harmonic stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Harmonic with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Harmonic include AudioCodes (AUDC), Clearfield (CLFD), Arista Networks (ANET), Ooma (OOMA), and Extreme Networks (EXTR). These companies are all part of the "computer and technology" sector.

How does Harmonic compare to AudioCodes?

AudioCodes (NASDAQ:AUDC) and Harmonic (NASDAQ:HLIT) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, risk, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Harmonic has a consensus target price of $16.60, indicating a potential upside of 33.92%. Given Harmonic's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Harmonic is more favorable than AudioCodes.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
AudioCodes
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Harmonic
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

AudioCodes has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Harmonic. Harmonic is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AudioCodes, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
AudioCodes$247.37M1.00$8.95M$0.2538.76
Harmonic$397.34M3.38-$43.31M-$0.37N/A

In the previous week, AudioCodes had 1 more articles in the media than Harmonic. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for AudioCodes and 3 mentions for Harmonic. Harmonic's average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat AudioCodes' score of 0.89 indicating that Harmonic is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
AudioCodes
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Harmonic
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

AudioCodes has a beta of 0.96, suggesting that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Harmonic has a beta of 1.29, suggesting that its stock price is 29% more volatile than the broader market.

68.1% of AudioCodes shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.4% of Harmonic shares are held by institutional investors. 48.8% of AudioCodes shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Harmonic shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

AudioCodes has a net margin of 2.79% compared to Harmonic's net margin of -7.50%. Harmonic's return on equity of 7.84% beat AudioCodes' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
AudioCodes2.79% 6.33% 3.34%
Harmonic -7.50%7.84%4.30%

Summary

Harmonic beats AudioCodes on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Harmonic compare to Clearfield?

Harmonic (NASDAQ:HLIT) and Clearfield (NASDAQ:CLFD) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, risk and valuation.

Harmonic currently has a consensus target price of $16.60, suggesting a potential upside of 33.92%. Clearfield has a consensus target price of $43.75, suggesting a potential upside of 40.58%. Given Clearfield's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Clearfield is more favorable than Harmonic.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Harmonic
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Clearfield
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57

Clearfield has a net margin of -5.41% compared to Harmonic's net margin of -7.50%. Harmonic's return on equity of 7.84% beat Clearfield's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Harmonic-7.50% 7.84% 4.30%
Clearfield -5.41%1.03%0.90%

Clearfield has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Harmonic. Clearfield is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Harmonic, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Harmonic$397.34M3.38-$43.31M-$0.37N/A
Clearfield$150.13M2.82-$8.05M-$0.62N/A

In the previous week, Harmonic had 1 more articles in the media than Clearfield. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Harmonic and 2 mentions for Clearfield. Harmonic's average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Clearfield's score of 0.93 indicating that Harmonic is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Harmonic
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Clearfield
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Harmonic has a beta of 1.29, meaning that its share price is 29% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Clearfield has a beta of 2.11, meaning that its share price is 111% more volatile than the broader market.

99.4% of Harmonic shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.7% of Clearfield shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of Harmonic shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 17.8% of Clearfield shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Harmonic beats Clearfield on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Harmonic compare to Arista Networks?

Arista Networks (NYSE:ANET) and Harmonic (NASDAQ:HLIT) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk and valuation.

Arista Networks has a net margin of 38.32% compared to Harmonic's net margin of -7.50%. Arista Networks' return on equity of 30.10% beat Harmonic's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Arista Networks38.32% 30.10% 19.35%
Harmonic -7.50%7.84%4.30%

Arista Networks has a beta of 1.6, suggesting that its share price is 60% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Harmonic has a beta of 1.29, suggesting that its share price is 29% more volatile than the broader market.

Arista Networks has higher revenue and earnings than Harmonic. Harmonic is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Arista Networks, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Arista Networks$9.01B23.35$3.51B$2.9257.20
Harmonic$397.34M3.38-$43.31M-$0.37N/A

In the previous week, Arista Networks had 48 more articles in the media than Harmonic. MarketBeat recorded 51 mentions for Arista Networks and 3 mentions for Harmonic. Arista Networks' average media sentiment score of 1.01 beat Harmonic's score of 0.95 indicating that Arista Networks is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Arista Networks
36 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Harmonic
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

82.5% of Arista Networks shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.4% of Harmonic shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.7% of Arista Networks shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Harmonic shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Arista Networks currently has a consensus price target of $188.95, indicating a potential upside of 13.14%. Harmonic has a consensus price target of $16.60, indicating a potential upside of 33.92%. Given Harmonic's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Harmonic is more favorable than Arista Networks.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Arista Networks
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
22 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.04
Harmonic
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Summary

Arista Networks beats Harmonic on 15 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Harmonic compare to Ooma?

Ooma (NYSE:OOMA) and Harmonic (NASDAQ:HLIT) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, profitability, risk and analyst recommendations.

Ooma has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Harmonic. Harmonic is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ooma, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ooma$273.60M2.05$6.46M$0.3263.81
Harmonic$397.34M3.38-$43.31M-$0.37N/A

80.4% of Ooma shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.4% of Harmonic shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.9% of Ooma shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Harmonic shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Ooma has a net margin of 3.17% compared to Harmonic's net margin of -7.50%. Ooma's return on equity of 20.21% beat Harmonic's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ooma3.17% 20.21% 9.79%
Harmonic -7.50%7.84%4.30%

Ooma has a beta of 1.2, suggesting that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Harmonic has a beta of 1.29, suggesting that its stock price is 29% more volatile than the broader market.

Ooma presently has a consensus target price of $22.33, indicating a potential upside of 9.38%. Harmonic has a consensus target price of $16.60, indicating a potential upside of 33.92%. Given Harmonic's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Harmonic is more favorable than Ooma.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ooma
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Harmonic
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

In the previous week, Ooma had 9 more articles in the media than Harmonic. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Ooma and 3 mentions for Harmonic. Ooma's average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat Harmonic's score of 0.95 indicating that Ooma is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Ooma
9 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Harmonic
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Ooma beats Harmonic on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Harmonic compare to Extreme Networks?

Harmonic (NASDAQ:HLIT) and Extreme Networks (NASDAQ:EXTR) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, institutional ownership and profitability.

Extreme Networks has a net margin of 1.30% compared to Harmonic's net margin of -7.50%. Extreme Networks' return on equity of 81.88% beat Harmonic's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Harmonic-7.50% 7.84% 4.30%
Extreme Networks 1.30%81.88%5.45%

99.4% of Harmonic shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.1% of Extreme Networks shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of Harmonic shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.6% of Extreme Networks shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Extreme Networks has higher revenue and earnings than Harmonic. Harmonic is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Extreme Networks, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Harmonic$397.34M3.38-$43.31M-$0.37N/A
Extreme Networks$1.25B3.14-$7.47M$0.12250.50

In the previous week, Extreme Networks had 5 more articles in the media than Harmonic. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Extreme Networks and 3 mentions for Harmonic. Harmonic's average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Extreme Networks' score of 0.69 indicating that Harmonic is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Harmonic
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Extreme Networks
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Harmonic currently has a consensus target price of $16.60, suggesting a potential upside of 33.92%. Extreme Networks has a consensus target price of $30.83, suggesting a potential upside of 2.57%. Given Harmonic's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Harmonic is more favorable than Extreme Networks.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Harmonic
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Extreme Networks
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75

Harmonic has a beta of 1.29, meaning that its share price is 29% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Extreme Networks has a beta of 1.77, meaning that its share price is 77% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Extreme Networks beats Harmonic on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Harmonic News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for HLIT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding HLIT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

HLIT vs. The Competition

MetricHarmonicCommunications Components IndustryComputer SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$1.35B$14.00B$38.33B$12.53B
Dividend YieldN/A2.05%3.21%9.45%
P/E Ratio-33.5740.00168.7324.26
Price / Sales3.385.11592.5089.42
Price / Cash16.9355.5847.0360.00
Price / Book3.637.719.416.27
Net Income-$43.31M-$6.80M$1.07B$331.55M
7 Day Performance-12.34%-7.25%-1.97%-1.46%
1 Month Performance-16.25%-3.33%-2.17%-0.54%
1 Year Performance35.91%114.63%138.16%19.19%

Harmonic Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
HLIT
Harmonic
3.5667 of 5 stars
$12.40
-4.6%
$16.60
+33.9%
+44.2%$1.35B$397.34MN/A1,240
AUDC
AudioCodes
2.0869 of 5 stars
$10.18
+0.1%
N/A+9.3%$258.86M$245.60M40.72880
CLFD
Clearfield
3.5996 of 5 stars
$32.74
-3.1%
$43.75
+33.6%
-22.3%$458.92M$150.13MN/A1,130
ANET
Arista Networks
4.265 of 5 stars
$181.17
-3.1%
$188.16
+3.9%
+59.8%$235.42B$9.01B62.045,115
OOMA
Ooma
3.3587 of 5 stars
$20.41
+1.1%
$22.33
+9.4%
+69.2%$554.95M$289.72M63.791,420

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:HLIT) was last updated on 7/16/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners