Free Trial

Harmonic (HLIT) Competitors

Harmonic logo
$11.17 0.00 (0.00%)
Closing price 10/2/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$11.17 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 10/2/2026 07:42 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

HLIT vs. AUDC, CLFD, ANET, OOMA, and BDC

Should you buy Harmonic stock or one of its competitors? Harmonic's main competitors and comparable companies include AudioCodes (AUDC), Clearfield (CLFD), Arista Networks (ANET), Ooma (OOMA), and Belden (BDC). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "technology" sector.

How does Harmonic compare to AudioCodes?

Harmonic (NASDAQ:HLIT) and AudioCodes (NASDAQ:AUDC) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, risk, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Harmonic presently has a consensus target price of $17.50, indicating a potential upside of 56.67%. Given Harmonic's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Harmonic is more favorable than AudioCodes.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Harmonic
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.29
AudioCodes
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

AudioCodes has a net margin of 2.83% compared to Harmonic's net margin of -8.50%. Harmonic's return on equity of 10.91% beat AudioCodes' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Harmonic-8.50% 10.91% 5.98%
AudioCodes 2.83%6.79%3.45%

AudioCodes has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Harmonic. Harmonic is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AudioCodes, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Harmonic$570.80M2.13-$43.31M-$0.42N/A
AudioCodes$245.60M1.09$8.95M$0.2642.65

In the previous week, Harmonic had 8 more articles in the media than AudioCodes. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Harmonic and 2 mentions for AudioCodes. AudioCodes' average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Harmonic's score of 0.82 indicating that AudioCodes is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Harmonic
2 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
AudioCodes
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Harmonic has a beta of 1.34, meaning that its share price is 34% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, AudioCodes has a beta of 1.02, meaning that its share price is 2% more volatile than the broader market.

99.4% of Harmonic shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.1% of AudioCodes shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.7% of Harmonic shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 48.8% of AudioCodes shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Harmonic beats AudioCodes on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Harmonic compare to Clearfield?

Harmonic (NASDAQ:HLIT) and Clearfield (NASDAQ:CLFD) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and profitability.

Clearfield has a net margin of -4.71% compared to Harmonic's net margin of -8.50%. Harmonic's return on equity of 10.91% beat Clearfield's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Harmonic-8.50% 10.91% 5.98%
Clearfield -4.71%1.61%1.45%

Clearfield has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Harmonic. Clearfield is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Harmonic, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Harmonic$570.80M2.13-$43.31M-$0.42N/A
Clearfield$150.13M3.03-$8.05M-$0.51N/A

In the previous week, Harmonic had 7 more articles in the media than Clearfield. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Harmonic and 3 mentions for Clearfield. Harmonic's average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat Clearfield's score of -0.07 indicating that Harmonic is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Harmonic
2 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Clearfield
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Harmonic currently has a consensus target price of $17.50, suggesting a potential upside of 56.67%. Clearfield has a consensus target price of $41.75, suggesting a potential upside of 24.70%. Given Harmonic's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Harmonic is more favorable than Clearfield.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Harmonic
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.29
Clearfield
2 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43

99.4% of Harmonic shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.7% of Clearfield shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of Harmonic shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 17.8% of Clearfield shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Harmonic has a beta of 1.34, suggesting that its share price is 34% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Clearfield has a beta of 2.14, suggesting that its share price is 114% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Harmonic beats Clearfield on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Harmonic compare to Arista Networks?

Arista Networks (NYSE:ANET) and Harmonic (NASDAQ:HLIT) are both technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, risk, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Arista Networks had 20 more articles in the media than Harmonic. MarketBeat recorded 30 mentions for Arista Networks and 10 mentions for Harmonic. Arista Networks' average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Harmonic's score of 0.82 indicating that Arista Networks is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Arista Networks
17 Very Positive mention(s)
6 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
2 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Harmonic
2 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

82.5% of Arista Networks shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.4% of Harmonic shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.7% of Arista Networks shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Harmonic shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Arista Networks has a net margin of 38.37% compared to Harmonic's net margin of -8.50%. Arista Networks' return on equity of 30.65% beat Harmonic's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Arista Networks38.37% 30.65% 19.44%
Harmonic -8.50%10.91%5.98%

Arista Networks presently has a consensus price target of $231.70, suggesting a potential upside of 11.66%. Harmonic has a consensus price target of $17.50, suggesting a potential upside of 56.67%. Given Harmonic's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Harmonic is more favorable than Arista Networks.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Arista Networks
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
21 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.09
Harmonic
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.29

Arista Networks has higher revenue and earnings than Harmonic. Harmonic is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Arista Networks, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Arista Networks$9.01B29.06$3.51B$3.1765.46
Harmonic$570.80M2.13-$43.31M-$0.42N/A

Arista Networks has a beta of 1.6, indicating that its share price is 60% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Harmonic has a beta of 1.34, indicating that its share price is 34% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Arista Networks beats Harmonic on 15 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Harmonic compare to Ooma?

Harmonic (NASDAQ:HLIT) and Ooma (NYSE:OOMA) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, risk and valuation.

Harmonic has a beta of 1.34, meaning that its share price is 34% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ooma has a beta of 1.23, meaning that its share price is 23% more volatile than the broader market.

Ooma has a net margin of 3.57% compared to Harmonic's net margin of -8.50%. Ooma's return on equity of 23.55% beat Harmonic's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Harmonic-8.50% 10.91% 5.98%
Ooma 3.57%23.55%10.65%

99.4% of Harmonic shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.4% of Ooma shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of Harmonic shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 9.9% of Ooma shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Ooma had 6 more articles in the media than Harmonic. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Ooma and 10 mentions for Harmonic. Harmonic's average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat Ooma's score of 0.74 indicating that Harmonic is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Harmonic
2 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Ooma
7 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Harmonic presently has a consensus price target of $17.50, indicating a potential upside of 56.67%. Ooma has a consensus price target of $25.00, indicating a potential upside of 19.57%. Given Harmonic's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Harmonic is more favorable than Ooma.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Harmonic
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.29
Ooma
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86

Ooma has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Harmonic. Harmonic is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ooma, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Harmonic$570.80M2.13-$43.31M-$0.42N/A
Ooma$273.60M2.11$6.46M$0.3855.02

Summary

Ooma beats Harmonic on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Harmonic compare to Belden?

Harmonic (NASDAQ:HLIT) and Belden (NYSE:BDC) are both technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, risk and valuation.

Belden has a net margin of 8.52% compared to Harmonic's net margin of -8.50%. Belden's return on equity of 25.00% beat Harmonic's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Harmonic-8.50% 10.91% 5.98%
Belden 8.52%25.00%9.24%

Harmonic presently has a consensus price target of $17.50, indicating a potential upside of 56.67%. Belden has a consensus price target of $156.00, indicating a potential upside of 38.75%. Given Harmonic's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Harmonic is more favorable than Belden.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Harmonic
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.29
Belden
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.88

In the previous week, Harmonic had 4 more articles in the media than Belden. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Harmonic and 6 mentions for Belden. Harmonic's average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat Belden's score of 0.37 indicating that Harmonic is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Harmonic
2 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Belden
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Belden has higher revenue and earnings than Harmonic. Harmonic is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Belden, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Harmonic$570.80M2.13-$43.31M-$0.42N/A
Belden$2.72B1.62$237.52M$6.1518.28

Harmonic has a beta of 1.34, meaning that its share price is 34% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Belden has a beta of 1.13, meaning that its share price is 13% more volatile than the broader market.

99.4% of Harmonic shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.8% of Belden shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of Harmonic shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Belden shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Belden beats Harmonic on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Harmonic News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for HLIT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding HLIT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

HLIT vs. The Competition

MetricHarmonicCommunications Equipment IndustryTechnology SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$1.22B$17.04B$31.95B$13.28B
Dividend YieldN/A4.23%2.75%17.33%
P/E Ratio-26.6032.6281.9026.04
Price / Sales2.1343.14592.0591.98
Price / Cash13.84114.4548.6034.69
Price / Book3.287.228.166.34
Net Income-$43.31M$310.07M$768.11M$381.73M
7 Day Performance5.58%3.18%115.93%-0.72%
1 Month Performance-5.18%3.83%73.46%-4.68%
1 Year Performance4.49%60.46%168.05%1.57%

Harmonic Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
HLIT
Harmonic
3.1323 of 5 stars
$11.17
flat
$17.50
+56.7%
+4.5%$1.22B$570.80MN/A559
AUDC
AudioCodes
2.0389 of 5 stars
$10.55
-1.0%
N/A+15.0%$257.47M$245.60M40.58981
CLFD
Clearfield
2.6704 of 5 stars
$30.66
-1.3%
$41.75
+36.2%
-6.5%$422.05M$150.13MN/A243
ANET
Arista Networks
4.5321 of 5 stars
$204.78
-0.9%
$230.74
+12.7%
+42.6%$260.51B$9.01B64.605,115
OOMA
Ooma
4.0234 of 5 stars
$21.19
-2.7%
$25.00
+18.0%
+81.1%$600.85M$273.60M55.761,420

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:HLIT) was last updated on 10/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners