NYSE:OOMA

Ooma Competitors

$16.22

+0.61 (+3.91 %)

(As of 12/1/2020 12:00 AM ET)

Add

Compare

Today's Range

$15.69

Now: $16.22▼

$16.39

50-Day Range

$13.20

MA: $14.57▼

$16.47

52-Week Range

$7.45

Now: $16.22▼

$19.18

Volume147,061 shs

Average Volume191,236 shs

Market Capitalization$363.33 million

P/E RatioN/A

Dividend YieldN/A

Beta0.45

Ooma (NYSE:OOMA) Vs. CSGS, SY, BITA, TCX, CARS, and TRVG

Should you be buying OOMA stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "data processing & preparation" are considered alternatives and competitors to Ooma, including CSG Systems International (CSGS), So-Young International (SY), Bitauto (BITA), Tucows (TCX), Cars.com (CARS), and trivago (TRVG).

Ooma vs. CSG Systems International Stock

Ooma (NYSE:OOMA) and CSG Systems International (NASDAQ:CSGS) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and risk.

Risk and Volatility

Ooma has a beta of 0.45, suggesting that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CSG Systems International has a beta of 0.88, suggesting that its stock price is 12% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for Ooma and CSG Systems International, as provided by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ooma	0	0	4	0	3.00
CSG Systems International	0	0	1	0	3.00

Ooma presently has a consensus price target of $22.8750, suggesting a potential upside of 41.03%. CSG Systems International has a consensus price target of $52.00, suggesting a potential upside of 20.45%. Given Ooma's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Ooma is more favorable than CSG Systems International.

Profitability

This table compares Ooma and CSG Systems International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ooma	-6.49%	-20.50%	-7.77%
CSG Systems International	6.91%	21.52%	6.78%

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Ooma and CSG Systems International's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ooma	$151.59 million	2.40	$-18,800,000.00	($0.65)	-24.95
CSG Systems International	$996.81 million	1.43	$82.77 million	$3.04	14.20

CSG Systems International has higher revenue and earnings than Ooma. Ooma is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CSG Systems International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

81.1% of Ooma shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.5% of CSG Systems International shares are held by institutional investors. 10.2% of Ooma shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of CSG Systems International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

CSG Systems International beats Ooma on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ooma vs. So-Young International Stock

Ooma (NYSE:OOMA) and So-Young International (NASDAQ:SY) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and risk.

Risk and Volatility

Ooma has a beta of 0.45, suggesting that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, So-Young International has a beta of 0.25, suggesting that its stock price is 75% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for Ooma and So-Young International, as provided by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ooma	0	0	4	0	3.00
So-Young International	0	1	5	0	2.83

Ooma presently has a consensus price target of $22.8750, suggesting a potential upside of 41.03%. So-Young International has a consensus price target of $14.8667, suggesting a potential upside of 21.36%. Given Ooma's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Ooma is more favorable than So-Young International.

Profitability

This table compares Ooma and So-Young International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ooma	-6.49%	-20.50%	-7.77%
So-Young International	5.84%	2.59%	2.13%

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Ooma and So-Young International's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ooma	$151.59 million	2.40	$-18,800,000.00	($0.65)	-24.95
So-Young International	$165.42 million	7.56	$25.38 million	N/A	N/A

So-Young International has higher revenue and earnings than Ooma.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

81.1% of Ooma shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.0% of So-Young International shares are held by institutional investors. 10.2% of Ooma shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

So-Young International beats Ooma on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ooma vs. Bitauto Stock

Ooma (NYSE:OOMA) and Bitauto (NYSE:BITA) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and risk.

Risk and Volatility

Ooma has a beta of 0.45, suggesting that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Bitauto has a beta of 0.69, suggesting that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for Ooma and Bitauto, as provided by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ooma	0	0	4	0	3.00
Bitauto	0	0	0	0	N/A

Ooma presently has a consensus price target of $22.8750, suggesting a potential upside of 41.03%. Given Ooma's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Ooma is more favorable than Bitauto.

Profitability

This table compares Ooma and Bitauto's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ooma	-6.49%	-20.50%	-7.77%
Bitauto	-25.73%	-7.96%	-3.20%

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Ooma and Bitauto's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ooma	$151.59 million	2.40	$-18,800,000.00	($0.65)	-24.95
Bitauto	$1.54 billion	0.75	$-169,250,000.00	($0.45)	-35.42

Ooma has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Bitauto. Bitauto is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ooma, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

81.1% of Ooma shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.9% of Bitauto shares are held by institutional investors. 10.2% of Ooma shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.0% of Bitauto shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Bitauto beats Ooma on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ooma vs. Tucows Stock

Ooma (NYSE:OOMA) and Tucows (NASDAQ:TCX) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and risk.

Risk and Volatility

Ooma has a beta of 0.45, suggesting that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Tucows has a beta of 0.96, suggesting that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for Ooma and Tucows, as provided by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ooma	0	0	4	0	3.00
Tucows	0	0	0	0	N/A

Profitability

This table compares Ooma and Tucows' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ooma	-6.49%	-20.50%	-7.77%
Tucows	3.81%	17.09%	3.70%

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Ooma and Tucows' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ooma	$151.59 million	2.40	$-18,800,000.00	($0.65)	-24.95
Tucows	$337.14 million	2.28	$15.40 million	N/A	N/A

Tucows has higher revenue and earnings than Ooma.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

81.1% of Ooma shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 54.9% of Tucows shares are held by institutional investors. 10.2% of Ooma shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.5% of Tucows shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Tucows beats Ooma on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ooma vs. Cars.com Stock

Ooma (NYSE:OOMA) and Cars.com (NYSE:CARS) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and risk.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Ooma and Cars.com's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ooma	$151.59 million	2.40	$-18,800,000.00	($0.65)	-24.95
Cars.com	$606.68 million	1.23	$-445,320,000.00	$1.45	7.63

Ooma has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Cars.com. Ooma is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cars.com, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Ooma and Cars.com's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ooma	-6.49%	-20.50%	-7.77%
Cars.com	-151.54%	17.78%	7.01%

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for Ooma and Cars.com, as provided by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ooma	0	0	4	0	3.00
Cars.com	0	1	6	0	2.86

Ooma presently has a consensus price target of $22.8750, suggesting a potential upside of 41.03%. Cars.com has a consensus price target of $11.50, suggesting a potential upside of 3.98%. Given Ooma's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Ooma is more favorable than Cars.com.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

81.1% of Ooma shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.7% of Cars.com shares are held by institutional investors. 10.2% of Ooma shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Cars.com shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk and Volatility

Ooma has a beta of 0.45, suggesting that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Cars.com has a beta of 2.13, suggesting that its stock price is 113% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Cars.com beats Ooma on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ooma vs. trivago Stock

trivago (NASDAQ:TRVG) and Ooma (NYSE:OOMA) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk and valuation.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares trivago and Ooma's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
trivago	$939.36 million	0.78	$19.22 million	$0.06	34.50
Ooma	$151.59 million	2.40	$-18,800,000.00	($0.65)	-24.95

trivago has higher revenue and earnings than Ooma. Ooma is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than trivago, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares trivago and Ooma's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
trivago	-40.93%	-2.46%	-1.95%
Ooma	-6.49%	-20.50%	-7.77%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for trivago and Ooma, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
trivago	0	7	2	0	2.22
Ooma	0	0	4	0	3.00

trivago currently has a consensus price target of $1.9688, suggesting a potential downside of 4.89%. Ooma has a consensus price target of $22.8750, suggesting a potential upside of 41.03%. Given Ooma's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Ooma is more favorable than trivago.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

10.6% of trivago shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.1% of Ooma shares are held by institutional investors. 10.2% of Ooma shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility and Risk

trivago has a beta of 1.3, suggesting that its share price is 30% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ooma has a beta of 0.45, suggesting that its share price is 55% less volatile than the S&P 500.