Which has better earnings & valuation, OOMA or FIVN?

Five9 has higher revenue and earnings than Ooma. Five9 is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ooma, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Ooma $273.60M 2.26 $6.46M $0.38 58.88 Five9 $1.15B 2.30 $39.42M $0.69 50.00

Is OOMA or FIVN more profitable?

Five9 has a net margin of 4.94% compared to Ooma's net margin of 3.57%. Ooma's return on equity of 23.55% beat Five9's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Ooma 3.57% 23.55% 10.65% Five9 4.94% 12.92% 5.65%

Does the media prefer OOMA or FIVN?

In the previous week, Ooma and Ooma both had 13 articles in the media. Five9's average media sentiment score of 0.74 beat Ooma's score of 0.27 indicating that Five9 is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Ooma 6 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Five9 4 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts recommend STRC or OOMA?

Ooma has a consensus price target of $25.00, indicating a potential upside of 11.73%. Given Ooma's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Ooma is more favorable than Strategy Inc Variable Rate Series A Perpetual Stretch Preferred Stock. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Strategy Inc Variable Rate Series A Perpetual Stretch Preferred Stock 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Ooma 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 5 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.83

Do analysts recommend OOMA or NCNO?

Ooma presently has a consensus price target of $25.00, indicating a potential upside of 11.73%. nCino has a consensus price target of $24.38, indicating a potential upside of 13.89%. Given nCino's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe nCino is more favorable than Ooma. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Ooma 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 5 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.83 nCino 1 Sell rating(s) 5 Hold rating(s) 11 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.67

Which has higher earnings and valuation, OOMA or NCNO?

Ooma has higher earnings, but lower revenue than nCino. Ooma is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than nCino, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Ooma $273.60M 2.26 $6.46M $0.38 58.88 nCino $594.78M 3.81 $5.18M $0.30 71.37

Is OOMA or NCNO more profitable?

nCino has a net margin of 5.40% compared to Ooma's net margin of 3.57%. Ooma's return on equity of 23.55% beat nCino's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Ooma 3.57% 23.55% 10.65% nCino 5.40% 7.71% 4.83%

Does the media prefer OOMA or NCNO?

In the previous week, Ooma had 7 more articles in the media than nCino. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Ooma and 6 mentions for nCino. nCino's average media sentiment score of 0.66 beat Ooma's score of 0.27 indicating that nCino is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Ooma 6 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral nCino 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, OOMA or PRCH?

Porch Group has higher revenue and earnings than Ooma. Porch Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ooma, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Ooma $273.60M 2.26 $6.46M $0.38 58.88 Porch Group $482.41M 4.37 $15.32M -$0.12 N/A

Is OOMA or PRCH more profitable?

Ooma has a net margin of 3.57% compared to Porch Group's net margin of -2.67%. Ooma's return on equity of 23.55% beat Porch Group's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Ooma 3.57% 23.55% 10.65% Porch Group -2.67% -68.47% -1.67%

Does the media refer more to OOMA or PRCH?

In the previous week, Ooma had 7 more articles in the media than Porch Group. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Ooma and 6 mentions for Porch Group. Porch Group's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Ooma's score of 0.27 indicating that Porch Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Ooma 6 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Porch Group 4 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, RAMP or OOMA?

LiveRamp has higher revenue and earnings than Ooma. LiveRamp is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ooma, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio LiveRamp $832.10M 2.77 $145.95M $2.44 15.51 Ooma $273.60M 2.26 $6.46M $0.38 58.88

Is RAMP or OOMA more profitable?

LiveRamp has a net margin of 18.71% compared to Ooma's net margin of 3.57%. Ooma's return on equity of 23.55% beat LiveRamp's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets LiveRamp 18.71% 9.77% 7.41% Ooma 3.57% 23.55% 10.65%

Does the media favor RAMP or OOMA?

In the previous week, Ooma had 11 more articles in the media than LiveRamp. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Ooma and 2 mentions for LiveRamp. LiveRamp's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Ooma's score of 0.27 indicating that LiveRamp is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment LiveRamp 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Ooma 6 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Ooma (OOMA) Competitors

$22.38 -0.21 (-0.91%)

Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$22.34 -0.04 (-0.17%)

As of 08:00 PM Eastern

Compare

OOMA vs. FIVN, STRC, NCNO, PRCH, and RAMP

Should you buy Ooma stock or one of its competitors? Ooma's main competitors and comparable companies include Five9 (FIVN), Strategy Inc Variable Rate Series A Perpetual Stretch Preferred Stock (STRC), nCino (NCNO), Porch Group (PRCH), and LiveRamp (RAMP). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "application software" industry.

How does Ooma compare to Five9?

Ooma (NYSE:OOMA) and Five9 (NASDAQ:FIVN) are both technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Ooma has a beta of 1.2, indicating that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Five9 has a beta of 1.48, indicating that its stock price is 48% more volatile than the broader market.

Ooma presently has a consensus target price of $25.00, suggesting a potential upside of 11.73%. Five9 has a consensus target price of $33.60, suggesting a potential downside of 2.61%. Given Ooma's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Ooma is more favorable than Five9.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ooma	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.83
Five9	0 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.68

Five9 has a net margin of 4.94% compared to Ooma's net margin of 3.57%. Ooma's return on equity of 23.55% beat Five9's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ooma	3.57%	23.55%	10.65%
Five9	4.94%	12.92%	5.65%

Five9 has higher revenue and earnings than Ooma. Five9 is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ooma, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ooma	$273.60M	2.26	$6.46M	$0.38	58.88
Five9	$1.15B	2.30	$39.42M	$0.69	50.00

In the previous week, Ooma and Ooma both had 13 articles in the media. Five9's average media sentiment score of 0.74 beat Ooma's score of 0.27 indicating that Five9 is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Ooma	6 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Five9	4 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

80.4% of Ooma shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.6% of Five9 shares are held by institutional investors. 9.9% of Ooma shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Five9 shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Five9 beats Ooma on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ooma compare to Strategy Inc Variable Rate Series A Perpetual Stretch Preferred Stock?

Strategy Inc Variable Rate Series A Perpetual Stretch Preferred Stock (NASDAQ:STRC) and Ooma (NYSE:OOMA) are both technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, risk and valuation.

26.0% of Strategy Inc Variable Rate Series A Perpetual Stretch Preferred Stock shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.4% of Ooma shares are owned by institutional investors. 18.3% of Strategy Inc Variable Rate Series A Perpetual Stretch Preferred Stock shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 9.9% of Ooma shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Ooma has a consensus price target of $25.00, indicating a potential upside of 11.73%. Given Ooma's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Ooma is more favorable than Strategy Inc Variable Rate Series A Perpetual Stretch Preferred Stock.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Strategy Inc Variable Rate Series A Perpetual Stretch Preferred Stock	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Ooma	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.83

Strategy Inc Variable Rate Series A Perpetual Stretch Preferred Stock has a beta of 3.25, indicating that its stock price is 225% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ooma has a beta of 1.2, indicating that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the broader market.

Ooma has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Strategy Inc Variable Rate Series A Perpetual Stretch Preferred Stock. Strategy Inc Variable Rate Series A Perpetual Stretch Preferred Stock is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ooma, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Strategy Inc Variable Rate Series A Perpetual Stretch Preferred Stock	$498.35M	5.10	-$116.55M	-$4.50	N/A
Ooma	$273.60M	2.26	$6.46M	$0.38	58.88

Ooma has a net margin of 3.57% compared to Strategy Inc Variable Rate Series A Perpetual Stretch Preferred Stock's net margin of 0.00%. Ooma's return on equity of 23.55% beat Strategy Inc Variable Rate Series A Perpetual Stretch Preferred Stock's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Strategy Inc Variable Rate Series A Perpetual Stretch Preferred Stock	N/A	N/A	N/A
Ooma	3.57%	23.55%	10.65%

In the previous week, Ooma had 12 more articles in the media than Strategy Inc Variable Rate Series A Perpetual Stretch Preferred Stock. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Ooma and 1 mentions for Strategy Inc Variable Rate Series A Perpetual Stretch Preferred Stock. Strategy Inc Variable Rate Series A Perpetual Stretch Preferred Stock's average media sentiment score of 0.41 beat Ooma's score of 0.27 indicating that Strategy Inc Variable Rate Series A Perpetual Stretch Preferred Stock is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Strategy Inc Variable Rate Series A Perpetual Stretch Preferred Stock	Neutral
Ooma	Neutral

Summary

Ooma beats Strategy Inc Variable Rate Series A Perpetual Stretch Preferred Stock on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ooma compare to nCino?

Ooma (NYSE:OOMA) and nCino (NASDAQ:NCNO) are both technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, profitability and institutional ownership.

Ooma has higher earnings, but lower revenue than nCino. Ooma is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than nCino, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ooma	$273.60M	2.26	$6.46M	$0.38	58.88
nCino	$594.78M	3.81	$5.18M	$0.30	71.37

Ooma presently has a consensus price target of $25.00, indicating a potential upside of 11.73%. nCino has a consensus price target of $24.38, indicating a potential upside of 13.89%. Given nCino's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe nCino is more favorable than Ooma.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ooma	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.83
nCino	1 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

nCino has a net margin of 5.40% compared to Ooma's net margin of 3.57%. Ooma's return on equity of 23.55% beat nCino's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ooma	3.57%	23.55%	10.65%
nCino	5.40%	7.71%	4.83%

In the previous week, Ooma had 7 more articles in the media than nCino. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Ooma and 6 mentions for nCino. nCino's average media sentiment score of 0.66 beat Ooma's score of 0.27 indicating that nCino is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Ooma	6 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
nCino	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

80.4% of Ooma shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.8% of nCino shares are held by institutional investors. 9.9% of Ooma shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of nCino shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Ooma has a beta of 1.2, indicating that its share price is 20% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, nCino has a beta of 0.69, indicating that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

nCino beats Ooma on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ooma compare to Porch Group?

Ooma (NYSE:OOMA) and Porch Group (NASDAQ:PRCH) are both technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

Ooma has a net margin of 3.57% compared to Porch Group's net margin of -2.67%. Ooma's return on equity of 23.55% beat Porch Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ooma	3.57%	23.55%	10.65%
Porch Group	-2.67%	-68.47%	-1.67%

Ooma currently has a consensus price target of $25.00, indicating a potential upside of 11.73%. Porch Group has a consensus price target of $18.42, indicating a potential upside of 15.25%. Given Porch Group's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Porch Group is more favorable than Ooma.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ooma	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.83
Porch Group	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Porch Group has higher revenue and earnings than Ooma. Porch Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ooma, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ooma	$273.60M	2.26	$6.46M	$0.38	58.88
Porch Group	$482.41M	4.37	$15.32M	-$0.12	N/A

80.4% of Ooma shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 48.5% of Porch Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.9% of Ooma shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 27.8% of Porch Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Ooma has a beta of 1.2, indicating that its share price is 20% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Porch Group has a beta of 3.17, indicating that its share price is 217% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Ooma had 7 more articles in the media than Porch Group. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Ooma and 6 mentions for Porch Group. Porch Group's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Ooma's score of 0.27 indicating that Porch Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Ooma	6 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Porch Group	4 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Ooma beats Porch Group on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ooma compare to LiveRamp?

LiveRamp (NYSE:RAMP) and Ooma (NYSE:OOMA) are both technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation and earnings.

LiveRamp has a net margin of 18.71% compared to Ooma's net margin of 3.57%. Ooma's return on equity of 23.55% beat LiveRamp's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
LiveRamp	18.71%	9.77%	7.41%
Ooma	3.57%	23.55%	10.65%

93.8% of LiveRamp shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.4% of Ooma shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.3% of LiveRamp shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 9.9% of Ooma shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

LiveRamp has higher revenue and earnings than Ooma. LiveRamp is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ooma, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
LiveRamp	$832.10M	2.77	$145.95M	$2.44	15.51
Ooma	$273.60M	2.26	$6.46M	$0.38	58.88

LiveRamp has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ooma has a beta of 1.2, indicating that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Ooma had 11 more articles in the media than LiveRamp. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Ooma and 2 mentions for LiveRamp. LiveRamp's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Ooma's score of 0.27 indicating that LiveRamp is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
LiveRamp	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Ooma	6 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

LiveRamp currently has a consensus target price of $40.21, suggesting a potential upside of 6.23%. Ooma has a consensus target price of $25.00, suggesting a potential upside of 11.73%. Given Ooma's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Ooma is more favorable than LiveRamp.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
LiveRamp	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25
Ooma	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.83

Summary

LiveRamp and Ooma tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Ooma News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding OOMA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

OOMA vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Ooma	Software Industry	Technology Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$623.21M	$15.62B	$29.44B	$23.00B
Dividend Yield	N/A	3.43%	2.76%	3.61%
P/E Ratio	58.88	141.37	77.40	28.31
Price / Sales	2.26	1,287.17	589.69	20.41
Price / Cash	22.01	45.91	47.26	33.29
Price / Book	6.29	8.75	7.79	4.69
Net Income	$6.46M	$434.46M	$704.45M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	-1.34%	0.85%	0.17%	-0.67%
1 Month Performance	11.65%	0.52%	-3.77%	-3.75%
1 Year Performance	71.84%	-0.65%	177.65%	9.11%

Ooma Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
OOMA Ooma	3.4166 of 5 stars	$22.38 -0.9%	$25.00 +11.7%	+77.5%	$623.21M	$273.60M	58.88	1,420	Insider Trade
FIVN Five9	3.155 of 5 stars	$31.23 -6.1%	$33.14 +6.1%	+33.6%	$2.55B	$1.15B	45.26	2,910	Analyst Forecast
STRC Strategy Inc Variable Rate Series A Perpetual Stretch Preferred Stock	1.3686 of 5 stars	$98.04 +0.3%	N/A	N/A	$2.54B	$498.35M	N/A	1,539	News Coverage Dividend Announcement
NCNO nCino	2.8954 of 5 stars	$22.14 -4.2%	$24.38 +10.1%	-27.6%	$2.44B	$594.78M	73.80	1,684	Positive News Insider Trade
PRCH Porch Group	2.4093 of 5 stars	$16.73 -6.7%	$18.42 +10.1%	-11.4%	$2.37B	$482.41M	N/A	1,700	News Coverage Positive News Insider Trade

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:OOMA) was last updated on 9/17/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Ooma (OOMA) Competitors