Log in
NYSE:OOMA

Ooma Competitors

$16.22
+0.61 (+3.91 %)
(As of 12/1/2020 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$15.69
Now: $16.22
$16.39
50-Day Range
$13.20
MA: $14.57
$16.47
52-Week Range
$7.45
Now: $16.22
$19.18
Volume147,061 shs
Average Volume191,236 shs
Market Capitalization$363.33 million
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta0.45

Competitors

Ooma (NYSE:OOMA) Vs. CSGS, SY, BITA, TCX, CARS, and TRVG

Should you be buying OOMA stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "data processing & preparation" are considered alternatives and competitors to Ooma, including CSG Systems International (CSGS), So-Young International (SY), Bitauto (BITA), Tucows (TCX), Cars.com (CARS), and trivago (TRVG).

Ooma (NYSE:OOMA) and CSG Systems International (NASDAQ:CSGS) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and risk.

Risk and Volatility

Ooma has a beta of 0.45, suggesting that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CSG Systems International has a beta of 0.88, suggesting that its stock price is 12% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for Ooma and CSG Systems International, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Ooma00403.00
CSG Systems International00103.00

Ooma presently has a consensus price target of $22.8750, suggesting a potential upside of 41.03%. CSG Systems International has a consensus price target of $52.00, suggesting a potential upside of 20.45%. Given Ooma's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Ooma is more favorable than CSG Systems International.

Profitability

This table compares Ooma and CSG Systems International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Ooma-6.49%-20.50%-7.77%
CSG Systems International6.91%21.52%6.78%

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Ooma and CSG Systems International's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ooma$151.59 million2.40$-18,800,000.00($0.65)-24.95
CSG Systems International$996.81 million1.43$82.77 million$3.0414.20

CSG Systems International has higher revenue and earnings than Ooma. Ooma is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CSG Systems International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

81.1% of Ooma shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.5% of CSG Systems International shares are held by institutional investors. 10.2% of Ooma shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of CSG Systems International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

CSG Systems International beats Ooma on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ooma (NYSE:OOMA) and So-Young International (NASDAQ:SY) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and risk.

Risk and Volatility

Ooma has a beta of 0.45, suggesting that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, So-Young International has a beta of 0.25, suggesting that its stock price is 75% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for Ooma and So-Young International, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Ooma00403.00
So-Young International01502.83

Ooma presently has a consensus price target of $22.8750, suggesting a potential upside of 41.03%. So-Young International has a consensus price target of $14.8667, suggesting a potential upside of 21.36%. Given Ooma's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Ooma is more favorable than So-Young International.

Profitability

This table compares Ooma and So-Young International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Ooma-6.49%-20.50%-7.77%
So-Young International5.84%2.59%2.13%

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Ooma and So-Young International's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ooma$151.59 million2.40$-18,800,000.00($0.65)-24.95
So-Young International$165.42 million7.56$25.38 millionN/AN/A

So-Young International has higher revenue and earnings than Ooma.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

81.1% of Ooma shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.0% of So-Young International shares are held by institutional investors. 10.2% of Ooma shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

So-Young International beats Ooma on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ooma (NYSE:OOMA) and Bitauto (NYSE:BITA) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and risk.

Risk and Volatility

Ooma has a beta of 0.45, suggesting that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Bitauto has a beta of 0.69, suggesting that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for Ooma and Bitauto, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Ooma00403.00
Bitauto0000N/A

Ooma presently has a consensus price target of $22.8750, suggesting a potential upside of 41.03%. Given Ooma's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Ooma is more favorable than Bitauto.

Profitability

This table compares Ooma and Bitauto's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Ooma-6.49%-20.50%-7.77%
Bitauto-25.73%-7.96%-3.20%

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Ooma and Bitauto's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ooma$151.59 million2.40$-18,800,000.00($0.65)-24.95
Bitauto$1.54 billion0.75$-169,250,000.00($0.45)-35.42

Ooma has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Bitauto. Bitauto is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ooma, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

81.1% of Ooma shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.9% of Bitauto shares are held by institutional investors. 10.2% of Ooma shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.0% of Bitauto shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Bitauto beats Ooma on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ooma (NYSE:OOMA) and Tucows (NASDAQ:TCX) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and risk.

Risk and Volatility

Ooma has a beta of 0.45, suggesting that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Tucows has a beta of 0.96, suggesting that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for Ooma and Tucows, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Ooma00403.00
Tucows0000N/A

Ooma presently has a consensus price target of $22.8750, suggesting a potential upside of 41.03%. Given Ooma's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Ooma is more favorable than Tucows.

Profitability

This table compares Ooma and Tucows' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Ooma-6.49%-20.50%-7.77%
Tucows3.81%17.09%3.70%

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Ooma and Tucows' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ooma$151.59 million2.40$-18,800,000.00($0.65)-24.95
Tucows$337.14 million2.28$15.40 millionN/AN/A

Tucows has higher revenue and earnings than Ooma.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

81.1% of Ooma shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 54.9% of Tucows shares are held by institutional investors. 10.2% of Ooma shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.5% of Tucows shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Tucows beats Ooma on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ooma (NYSE:OOMA) and Cars.com (NYSE:CARS) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and risk.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Ooma and Cars.com's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ooma$151.59 million2.40$-18,800,000.00($0.65)-24.95
Cars.com$606.68 million1.23$-445,320,000.00$1.457.63

Ooma has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Cars.com. Ooma is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cars.com, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Ooma and Cars.com's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Ooma-6.49%-20.50%-7.77%
Cars.com-151.54%17.78%7.01%

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for Ooma and Cars.com, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Ooma00403.00
Cars.com01602.86

Ooma presently has a consensus price target of $22.8750, suggesting a potential upside of 41.03%. Cars.com has a consensus price target of $11.50, suggesting a potential upside of 3.98%. Given Ooma's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Ooma is more favorable than Cars.com.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

81.1% of Ooma shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.7% of Cars.com shares are held by institutional investors. 10.2% of Ooma shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Cars.com shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk and Volatility

Ooma has a beta of 0.45, suggesting that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Cars.com has a beta of 2.13, suggesting that its stock price is 113% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Cars.com beats Ooma on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

trivago (NASDAQ:TRVG) and Ooma (NYSE:OOMA) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk and valuation.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares trivago and Ooma's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
trivago$939.36 million0.78$19.22 million$0.0634.50
Ooma$151.59 million2.40$-18,800,000.00($0.65)-24.95

trivago has higher revenue and earnings than Ooma. Ooma is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than trivago, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares trivago and Ooma's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
trivago-40.93%-2.46%-1.95%
Ooma-6.49%-20.50%-7.77%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for trivago and Ooma, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
trivago07202.22
Ooma00403.00

trivago currently has a consensus price target of $1.9688, suggesting a potential downside of 4.89%. Ooma has a consensus price target of $22.8750, suggesting a potential upside of 41.03%. Given Ooma's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Ooma is more favorable than trivago.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

10.6% of trivago shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.1% of Ooma shares are held by institutional investors. 10.2% of Ooma shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility and Risk

trivago has a beta of 1.3, suggesting that its share price is 30% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ooma has a beta of 0.45, suggesting that its share price is 55% less volatile than the S&P 500.


Ooma Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
CSG Systems International logo
CSGS
CSG Systems International
2.2$43.17+0.5%$1.42 billion$996.81 million20.56
SY
So-Young International
0.9$12.25+4.1%$1.25 billion$165.42 million153.14Earnings Announcement
Bitauto logo
BITA
Bitauto
0.8$15.94+0.0%$1.16 billion$1.54 billion-3.50
Tucows logo
TCX
Tucows
0.8$72.50+0.0%$768.94 million$337.14 million60.42Heavy News Reporting
Cars.com logo
CARS
Cars.com
1.5$11.06+1.0%$745.29 million$606.68 million-0.89
trivago logo
TRVG
trivago
0.8$2.07+5.8%$728.35 million$939.36 million-2.84Analyst Report
Increase in Short Interest
Veritone logo
VERI
Veritone
0.8$25.28+5.3%$701.09 million$49.65 million-11.76Heavy News Reporting
Sohu.com logo
SOHU
Sohu.com
1.2$17.63+4.1%$691.61 million$1.85 billion-4.90Unusual Options Activity
Brightcove logo
BCOV
Brightcove
1.6$16.57+0.8%$659.59 million$184.46 million-44.78Analyst Downgrade
High Trading Volume
ZIX logo
ZIXI
ZIX
1.9$7.21+0.1%$410.91 million$173.43 million-23.26
CTK
CooTek (Cayman)
1.1$4.71+5.3%$299.58 million$177.88 million-9.81Upcoming Earnings
Increase in Short Interest
KLR
Kaleyra
1.6$9.50+5.1%$278.60 million$129.56 million-7.48High Trading Volume
Heavy News Reporting
NantHealth logo
NH
NantHealth
0.6$2.42+5.0%$269.14 million$95.96 million-5.50
Liberty TripAdvisor logo
LTRPA
Liberty TripAdvisor
1.0$2.95+6.8%$221.60 million$1.56 billion-0.77Heavy News Reporting
GTYH
GTY Technology
1.4$3.56+0.6%$190.63 million$36.44 million-5.09
Castlight Health logo
CSLT
Castlight Health
0.8$1.17+7.7%$179.92 million$143.31 million-2.39
Renren logo
RENN
Renren
0.5$5.96+4.4%$136.66 million$349.78 million0.00Decrease in Short Interest
INOD
Innodata
0.4$5.16+0.8%$127.67 million$55.86 million-258.00Insider Selling
High Trading Volume
Heavy News Reporting
Fang logo
SFUN
Fang
0.6$13.87+0.9%$124.00 million$219.71 million-2.08High Trading Volume
Heavy News Reporting
Park City Group logo
PCYG
Park City Group
0.7$4.74+1.1%$92.43 million$20.04 million79.01
KERN
Akerna
1.4$3.71+15.6%$73.04 million$12.57 million-2.42High Trading Volume
Decrease in Short Interest
Net Element logo
NETE
Net Element
0.7$10.82+5.4%$52.42 million$65 million0.00Heavy News Reporting
Support.com logo
SPRT
Support.com
0.7$2.02+2.0%$39.14 million$63.33 million14.43Decrease in Short Interest
PHUN
Phunware
1.3$0.72+5.5%$35.43 million$19.15 million-2.12High Trading Volume
Increase in Short Interest
Marin Software logo
MRIN
Marin Software
0.6$2.19+3.2%$19.42 millionN/A0.00
Sphere 3D logo
ANY
Sphere 3D
0.6$1.81+5.5%$14.24 million$5.58 million-1.33High Trading Volume
This page was last updated on 12/2/2020 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.