Which has higher valuation & earnings, PRCH or OOMA?

Porch Group has higher revenue and earnings than Ooma. Porch Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ooma, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Porch Group $482.41M 4.83 $15.32M -$0.12 N/A Ooma $306.59M 2.04 $6.46M $0.38 59.92

Is PRCH or OOMA more profitable?

Ooma has a net margin of 3.57% compared to Porch Group's net margin of -2.67%. Ooma's return on equity of 23.89% beat Porch Group's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Porch Group -2.67% -68.47% -1.67% Ooma 3.57% 23.89% 10.97%

Does the media refer more to PRCH or OOMA?

In the previous week, Ooma had 9 more articles in the media than Porch Group. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Ooma and 7 mentions for Porch Group. Porch Group's average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat Ooma's score of 0.66 indicating that Porch Group is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Porch Group 4 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Ooma 3 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, OOMA or NCNO?

Ooma has higher earnings, but lower revenue than nCino. Ooma is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than nCino, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Ooma $306.59M 2.04 $6.46M $0.38 59.92 nCino $594.78M 4.30 $5.18M $0.30 77.90

Is OOMA or NCNO more profitable?

nCino has a net margin of 5.40% compared to Ooma's net margin of 3.57%. Ooma's return on equity of 23.89% beat nCino's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Ooma 3.57% 23.89% 10.97% nCino 5.40% 7.71% 4.83%

Does the media prefer OOMA or NCNO?

In the previous week, nCino had 24 more articles in the media than Ooma. MarketBeat recorded 40 mentions for nCino and 16 mentions for Ooma. nCino's average media sentiment score of 0.78 beat Ooma's score of 0.66 indicating that nCino is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Ooma 3 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive nCino 16 Very Positive mention(s) 6 Positive mention(s) 10 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, BITF or OOMA?

Ooma has higher revenue and earnings than Bitfarms. Bitfarms is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ooma, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Bitfarms $229.28M 9.23 -$138.65M -$0.23 N/A Ooma $306.59M 2.04 $6.46M $0.38 59.92

Is BITF or OOMA more profitable?

Ooma has a net margin of 3.57% compared to Bitfarms' net margin of -48.26%. Ooma's return on equity of 23.89% beat Bitfarms' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Bitfarms -48.26% -4.48% -3.71% Ooma 3.57% 23.89% 10.97%

Does the media refer more to BITF or OOMA?

In the previous week, Ooma had 15 more articles in the media than Bitfarms. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Ooma and 1 mentions for Bitfarms. Ooma's average media sentiment score of 0.66 beat Bitfarms' score of 0.00 indicating that Ooma is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Bitfarms 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Ooma 3 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Is OOMA or ALKT more profitable?

Ooma has a net margin of 3.57% compared to Alkami Technology's net margin of -9.21%. Ooma's return on equity of 23.89% beat Alkami Technology's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Ooma 3.57% 23.89% 10.97% Alkami Technology -9.21% -7.68% -3.32%

Does the media prefer OOMA or ALKT?

In the previous week, Ooma and Ooma both had 16 articles in the media. Alkami Technology's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Ooma's score of 0.66 indicating that Alkami Technology is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Ooma 3 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Alkami Technology 8 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has higher earnings and valuation, OOMA or KEEL?

Ooma has higher revenue and earnings than Keel Infrastructure. Keel Infrastructure is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ooma, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Ooma $306.59M 2.04 $6.46M $0.38 59.92 Keel Infrastructure $188.14M 10.47 -$284.54M -$0.30 N/A

Is OOMA or KEEL more profitable?

Ooma has a net margin of 3.57% compared to Keel Infrastructure's net margin of -230.59%. Ooma's return on equity of 23.89% beat Keel Infrastructure's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Ooma 3.57% 23.89% 10.97% Keel Infrastructure -230.59% -66.18% -27.74%

Does the media refer more to OOMA or KEEL?

In the previous week, Ooma had 6 more articles in the media than Keel Infrastructure. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Ooma and 10 mentions for Keel Infrastructure. Keel Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of 1.07 beat Ooma's score of 0.66 indicating that Keel Infrastructure is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Ooma 3 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Keel Infrastructure 4 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Ooma (OOMA) Competitors

$22.77 -0.27 (-1.17%)

As of 12:02 PM Eastern

Compare

OOMA vs. PRCH, NCNO, BITF, ALKT, and KEEL

Should you buy Ooma stock or one of its competitors? Ooma's main competitors and comparable companies include Porch Group (PRCH), nCino (NCNO), Bitfarms (BITF), Alkami Technology (ALKT), and Keel Infrastructure (KEEL). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "application software" industry.

How does Ooma compare to Porch Group?

Porch Group (NASDAQ:PRCH) and Ooma (NYSE:OOMA) are both technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, valuation and profitability.

Porch Group has higher revenue and earnings than Ooma. Porch Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ooma, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Porch Group	$482.41M	4.83	$15.32M	-$0.12	N/A
Ooma	$306.59M	2.04	$6.46M	$0.38	59.92

Porch Group has a beta of 3.15, meaning that its stock price is 215% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ooma has a beta of 1.19, meaning that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

Porch Group presently has a consensus price target of $18.79, indicating a potential upside of 6.31%. Ooma has a consensus price target of $25.00, indicating a potential upside of 9.79%. Given Ooma's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Ooma is more favorable than Porch Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Porch Group	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.56
Ooma	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.83

Ooma has a net margin of 3.57% compared to Porch Group's net margin of -2.67%. Ooma's return on equity of 23.89% beat Porch Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Porch Group	-2.67%	-68.47%	-1.67%
Ooma	3.57%	23.89%	10.97%

48.5% of Porch Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.4% of Ooma shares are held by institutional investors. 27.8% of Porch Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.9% of Ooma shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Ooma had 9 more articles in the media than Porch Group. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Ooma and 7 mentions for Porch Group. Porch Group's average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat Ooma's score of 0.66 indicating that Porch Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Porch Group	4 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Ooma	3 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Ooma beats Porch Group on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ooma compare to nCino?

Ooma (NYSE:OOMA) and nCino (NASDAQ:NCNO) are both technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation and dividends.

Ooma currently has a consensus target price of $25.00, indicating a potential upside of 9.79%. nCino has a consensus target price of $24.38, indicating a potential upside of 4.34%. Given Ooma's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Ooma is more favorable than nCino.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ooma	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.83
nCino	1 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

Ooma has a beta of 1.19, indicating that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, nCino has a beta of 0.66, indicating that its share price is 34% less volatile than the broader market.

Ooma has higher earnings, but lower revenue than nCino. Ooma is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than nCino, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ooma	$306.59M	2.04	$6.46M	$0.38	59.92
nCino	$594.78M	4.30	$5.18M	$0.30	77.90

80.4% of Ooma shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.8% of nCino shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.9% of Ooma shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of nCino shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, nCino had 24 more articles in the media than Ooma. MarketBeat recorded 40 mentions for nCino and 16 mentions for Ooma. nCino's average media sentiment score of 0.78 beat Ooma's score of 0.66 indicating that nCino is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Ooma	3 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
nCino	16 Very Positive mention(s)	6 Positive mention(s)	10 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

nCino has a net margin of 5.40% compared to Ooma's net margin of 3.57%. Ooma's return on equity of 23.89% beat nCino's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ooma	3.57%	23.89%	10.97%
nCino	5.40%	7.71%	4.83%

Summary

nCino beats Ooma on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ooma compare to Bitfarms?

Bitfarms (NASDAQ:BITF) and Ooma (NYSE:OOMA) are both technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Ooma has higher revenue and earnings than Bitfarms. Bitfarms is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ooma, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Bitfarms	$229.28M	9.23	-$138.65M	-$0.23	N/A
Ooma	$306.59M	2.04	$6.46M	$0.38	59.92

In the previous week, Ooma had 15 more articles in the media than Bitfarms. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Ooma and 1 mentions for Bitfarms. Ooma's average media sentiment score of 0.66 beat Bitfarms' score of 0.00 indicating that Ooma is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Bitfarms	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Ooma	3 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Bitfarms presently has a consensus target price of $4.68, indicating a potential upside of 33.19%. Ooma has a consensus target price of $25.00, indicating a potential upside of 9.79%. Given Bitfarms' higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Bitfarms is more favorable than Ooma.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Bitfarms	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.57
Ooma	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.83

Ooma has a net margin of 3.57% compared to Bitfarms' net margin of -48.26%. Ooma's return on equity of 23.89% beat Bitfarms' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Bitfarms	-48.26%	-4.48%	-3.71%
Ooma	3.57%	23.89%	10.97%

Bitfarms has a beta of 3.77, suggesting that its share price is 277% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ooma has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

20.6% of Bitfarms shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.4% of Ooma shares are held by institutional investors. 9.5% of Bitfarms shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 9.9% of Ooma shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Ooma beats Bitfarms on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ooma compare to Alkami Technology?

Ooma (NYSE:OOMA) and Alkami Technology (NASDAQ:ALKT) are both technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, risk, dividends, profitability and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Ooma and Ooma both had 16 articles in the media. Alkami Technology's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Ooma's score of 0.66 indicating that Alkami Technology is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Ooma	3 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Alkami Technology	8 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Ooma presently has a consensus target price of $25.00, indicating a potential upside of 9.79%. Alkami Technology has a consensus target price of $23.80, indicating a potential upside of 16.72%. Given Alkami Technology's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Alkami Technology is more favorable than Ooma.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ooma	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.83
Alkami Technology	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.29

Ooma has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Alkami Technology. Alkami Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ooma, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ooma	$306.59M	2.04	$6.46M	$0.38	59.92
Alkami Technology	$443.64M	4.92	-$47.65M	-$0.42	N/A

Ooma has a net margin of 3.57% compared to Alkami Technology's net margin of -9.21%. Ooma's return on equity of 23.89% beat Alkami Technology's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ooma	3.57%	23.89%	10.97%
Alkami Technology	-9.21%	-7.68%	-3.32%

Ooma has a beta of 1.19, meaning that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alkami Technology has a beta of 0.58, meaning that its share price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

80.4% of Ooma shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.0% of Alkami Technology shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.9% of Ooma shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.1% of Alkami Technology shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Ooma beats Alkami Technology on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ooma compare to Keel Infrastructure?

Ooma (NYSE:OOMA) and Keel Infrastructure (NASDAQ:KEEL) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends and profitability.

Ooma has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Keel Infrastructure has a beta of 4.14, suggesting that its share price is 314% more volatile than the broader market.

Ooma currently has a consensus target price of $25.00, indicating a potential upside of 9.79%. Keel Infrastructure has a consensus target price of $6.25, indicating a potential upside of 95.92%. Given Keel Infrastructure's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Keel Infrastructure is more favorable than Ooma.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ooma	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.83
Keel Infrastructure	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

Ooma has higher revenue and earnings than Keel Infrastructure. Keel Infrastructure is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ooma, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ooma	$306.59M	2.04	$6.46M	$0.38	59.92
Keel Infrastructure	$188.14M	10.47	-$284.54M	-$0.30	N/A

Ooma has a net margin of 3.57% compared to Keel Infrastructure's net margin of -230.59%. Ooma's return on equity of 23.89% beat Keel Infrastructure's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ooma	3.57%	23.89%	10.97%
Keel Infrastructure	-230.59%	-66.18%	-27.74%

In the previous week, Ooma had 6 more articles in the media than Keel Infrastructure. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Ooma and 10 mentions for Keel Infrastructure. Keel Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of 1.07 beat Ooma's score of 0.66 indicating that Keel Infrastructure is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Ooma	3 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Keel Infrastructure	4 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

80.4% of Ooma shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.6% of Keel Infrastructure shares are held by institutional investors. 9.9% of Ooma shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 9.5% of Keel Infrastructure shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Ooma beats Keel Infrastructure on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Ooma News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding OOMA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

OOMA vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Ooma	Software Industry	Technology Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$626.18M	$16.36B	$29.90B	$24.16B
Dividend Yield	N/A	3.42%	2.74%	3.71%
P/E Ratio	59.92	139.66	76.70	30.14
Price / Sales	2.04	1,278.46	589.38	16.92
Price / Cash	20.01	46.94	48.96	33.18
Price / Book	6.76	7.54	9.41	7.69
Net Income	$6.46M	$434.52M	$676.95M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	3.74%	2.49%	0.77%	-0.35%
1 Month Performance	3.02%	5.85%	5.22%	1.54%
1 Year Performance	75.67%	5.59%	187.30%	13.79%

Ooma Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
OOMA Ooma	3.3385 of 5 stars	$22.77 -1.2%	$25.00 +9.8%	+74.9%	$626.18M	$306.59M	59.92	1,420	Earnings Report Analyst Forecast
PRCH Porch Group	1.8578 of 5 stars	$16.68 -0.5%	$18.79 +12.6%	+7.2%	$2.29B	$482.41M	N/A	1,700	Positive News
NCNO nCino	2.8045 of 5 stars	$20.20 -0.1%	$25.29 +25.2%	-28.7%	$2.28B	$594.78M	168.33	1,684	News Coverage Analyst Forecast
BITF Bitfarms	1.4945 of 5 stars	$3.77 +7.4%	$4.68 +24.0%	+150.7%	$2.27B	$229.28M	N/A	110	Gap Up
ALKT Alkami Technology	3.4518 of 5 stars	$20.14 -0.3%	$22.20 +10.2%	-19.5%	$2.21B	$443.64M	N/A	1,225	Positive News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:OOMA) was last updated on 8/28/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Ooma (OOMA) Competitors