Free Trial

Ooma (OOMA) Competitors

Ooma logo
$18.81 +0.10 (+0.52%)
Closing price 05/15/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$18.83 +0.02 (+0.12%)
As of 05/15/2026 06:11 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

OOMA vs. FLYW, HAWK, TNET, RAMP, and PAYO

Should you buy Ooma stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Ooma with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Ooma include Flywire (FLYW), HawkEye 360 (HAWK), TriNet Group (TNET), LiveRamp (RAMP), and Payoneer Global (PAYO). These companies are all part of the "business services" industry.

How does Ooma compare to Flywire?

Ooma (NYSE:OOMA) and Flywire (NASDAQ:FLYW) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends and media sentiment.

Ooma currently has a consensus target price of $19.00, indicating a potential upside of 1.03%. Flywire has a consensus target price of $18.17, indicating a potential upside of 13.12%. Given Flywire's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Flywire is more favorable than Ooma.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ooma
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Flywire
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57

Ooma has a beta of 1.2, indicating that its share price is 20% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Flywire has a beta of 1.3, indicating that its share price is 30% more volatile than the broader market.

Flywire has a net margin of 4.45% compared to Ooma's net margin of 2.36%. Ooma's return on equity of 15.60% beat Flywire's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ooma2.36% 15.60% 8.24%
Flywire 4.45%3.78%2.61%

80.4% of Ooma shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.9% of Flywire shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.9% of Ooma shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.4% of Flywire shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Flywire had 10 more articles in the media than Ooma. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Flywire and 3 mentions for Ooma. Flywire's average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat Ooma's score of 0.60 indicating that Flywire is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Ooma
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Flywire
4 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Flywire has higher revenue and earnings than Ooma. Flywire is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ooma, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ooma$273.60M1.89$6.46M$0.2285.49
Flywire$623.03M3.18$13.50M$0.2369.83

Summary

Flywire beats Ooma on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ooma compare to HawkEye 360?

HawkEye 360 (NYSE:HAWK) and Ooma (NYSE:OOMA) are both business services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership and profitability.

Ooma has higher revenue and earnings than HawkEye 360.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
HawkEye 360$177.42M16.89N/AN/AN/A
Ooma$273.60M1.89$6.46M$0.2285.49

HawkEye 360 has a beta of 0.72, suggesting that its share price is 28% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ooma has a beta of 1.2, suggesting that its share price is 20% more volatile than the broader market.

Ooma has a consensus target price of $19.00, indicating a potential upside of 1.03%. Given Ooma's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Ooma is more favorable than HawkEye 360.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
HawkEye 360
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Ooma
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

Ooma has a net margin of 2.36% compared to HawkEye 360's net margin of 0.00%. Ooma's return on equity of 15.60% beat HawkEye 360's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
HawkEye 360N/A N/A N/A
Ooma 2.36%15.60%8.24%

In the previous week, HawkEye 360 had 3 more articles in the media than Ooma. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for HawkEye 360 and 3 mentions for Ooma. Ooma's average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat HawkEye 360's score of 0.54 indicating that Ooma is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
HawkEye 360
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Ooma
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

90.7% of HawkEye 360 shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.4% of Ooma shares are held by institutional investors. 3.8% of HawkEye 360 shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 9.9% of Ooma shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Ooma beats HawkEye 360 on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ooma compare to TriNet Group?

TriNet Group (NYSE:TNET) and Ooma (NYSE:OOMA) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, earnings, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations and valuation.

TriNet Group has a net margin of 3.22% compared to Ooma's net margin of 2.36%. TriNet Group's return on equity of 219.54% beat Ooma's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
TriNet Group3.22% 219.54% 5.42%
Ooma 2.36%15.60%8.24%

In the previous week, TriNet Group had 2 more articles in the media than Ooma. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for TriNet Group and 3 mentions for Ooma. TriNet Group's average media sentiment score of 0.85 beat Ooma's score of 0.60 indicating that TriNet Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
TriNet Group
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Ooma
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

96.8% of TriNet Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.4% of Ooma shares are owned by institutional investors. 40.0% of TriNet Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 9.9% of Ooma shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

TriNet Group has higher revenue and earnings than Ooma. TriNet Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ooma, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TriNet Group$5.01B0.37$155M$3.3512.09
Ooma$273.60M1.89$6.46M$0.2285.49

TriNet Group has a beta of 1.02, suggesting that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ooma has a beta of 1.2, suggesting that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the broader market.

TriNet Group presently has a consensus target price of $55.20, suggesting a potential upside of 36.33%. Ooma has a consensus target price of $19.00, suggesting a potential upside of 1.03%. Given TriNet Group's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe TriNet Group is more favorable than Ooma.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
TriNet Group
2 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.14
Ooma
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

Summary

TriNet Group beats Ooma on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ooma compare to LiveRamp?

Ooma (NYSE:OOMA) and LiveRamp (NYSE:RAMP) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, earnings, risk, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Ooma presently has a consensus target price of $19.00, suggesting a potential upside of 1.03%. LiveRamp has a consensus target price of $39.00, suggesting a potential upside of 31.52%. Given LiveRamp's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe LiveRamp is more favorable than Ooma.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ooma
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
LiveRamp
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43

LiveRamp has a net margin of 8.64% compared to Ooma's net margin of 2.36%. Ooma's return on equity of 15.60% beat LiveRamp's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ooma2.36% 15.60% 8.24%
LiveRamp 8.64%6.40%4.87%

In the previous week, LiveRamp had 1 more articles in the media than Ooma. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for LiveRamp and 3 mentions for Ooma. Ooma's average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat LiveRamp's score of 0.59 indicating that Ooma is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Ooma
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
LiveRamp
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Ooma has higher earnings, but lower revenue than LiveRamp. LiveRamp is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ooma, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ooma$273.60M1.89$6.46M$0.2285.49
LiveRamp$745.58M2.51-$810K$1.0627.97

Ooma has a beta of 1.2, suggesting that its share price is 20% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, LiveRamp has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

80.4% of Ooma shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.8% of LiveRamp shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.9% of Ooma shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of LiveRamp shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Ooma and LiveRamp tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ooma compare to Payoneer Global?

Ooma (NYSE:OOMA) and Payoneer Global (NASDAQ:PAYO) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Payoneer Global has higher revenue and earnings than Ooma. Payoneer Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ooma, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ooma$273.60M1.89$6.46M$0.2285.49
Payoneer Global$1.05B1.46$73.19M$0.2023.00

Payoneer Global has a net margin of 6.76% compared to Ooma's net margin of 2.36%. Ooma's return on equity of 15.60% beat Payoneer Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ooma2.36% 15.60% 8.24%
Payoneer Global 6.76%11.10%0.95%

Ooma has a beta of 1.2, suggesting that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Payoneer Global has a beta of 1.01, suggesting that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market.

80.4% of Ooma shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.2% of Payoneer Global shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.9% of Ooma shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.6% of Payoneer Global shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Payoneer Global had 1 more articles in the media than Ooma. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Payoneer Global and 3 mentions for Ooma. Payoneer Global's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Ooma's score of 0.60 indicating that Payoneer Global is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Ooma
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Payoneer Global
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Ooma currently has a consensus target price of $19.00, suggesting a potential upside of 1.03%. Payoneer Global has a consensus target price of $7.57, suggesting a potential upside of 64.60%. Given Payoneer Global's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Payoneer Global is more favorable than Ooma.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ooma
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Payoneer Global
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.88

Summary

Payoneer Global beats Ooma on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Ooma News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for OOMA and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding OOMA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

OOMA vs. The Competition

MetricOomaCommunications Components IndustryComputer SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$517.73M$17.81B$39.01B$22.75B
Dividend YieldN/A2.37%3.21%4.13%
P/E Ratio85.4963.31159.5826.79
Price / Sales1.896.11630.9524.00
Price / Cash18.3463.9747.8118.80
Price / Book5.589.529.664.57
Net Income$6.46M-$6.80M$1.06B$1.07B
7 Day Performance-2.53%1.40%-1.51%-2.27%
1 Month Performance20.11%8.55%4.17%-1.66%
1 Year Performance36.33%168.50%161.58%21.94%

Ooma Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
OOMA
Ooma
2.1661 of 5 stars
$18.81
+0.5%
$19.00
+1.0%
+36.3%$517.73M$273.60M85.491,420
FLYW
Flywire
4.2648 of 5 stars
$16.66
+1.2%
$18.17
+9.0%
+41.4%$2.02B$677.69M72.431,400
HAWK
HawkEye 360
N/A$34.65
+4.4%
N/AN/A$1.98B$117.66MN/A403
TNET
TriNet Group
4.6167 of 5 stars
$41.44
-1.1%
$55.20
+33.2%
-53.0%$1.90B$5.01B12.373,400
RAMP
LiveRamp
3.4953 of 5 stars
$28.67
-2.3%
$39.00
+36.0%
+1.1%$1.81B$745.58M27.041,300

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:OOMA) was last updated on 5/17/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners