Criteo Competitors

Arrow Electronics (NYSE:ARW) and Criteo (NASDAQ:CRTO) are both mid-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares Arrow Electronics and Criteo's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Arrow Electronics and Criteo, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Arrow Electronics presently has a consensus target price of $97.00, suggesting a potential downside of 18.50%. Criteo has a consensus target price of $33.6818, suggesting a potential downside of 6.93%. Given Criteo's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Criteo is more favorable than Arrow Electronics.

Volatility & Risk

Arrow Electronics has a beta of 1.55, suggesting that its stock price is 55% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Criteo has a beta of 1.05, suggesting that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

94.5% of Arrow Electronics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.9% of Criteo shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.6% of Arrow Electronics shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.6% of Criteo shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Arrow Electronics and Criteo's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Criteo has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Arrow Electronics. Arrow Electronics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Criteo, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Criteo beats Arrow Electronics on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Flex (NASDAQ:FLEX) and Criteo (NASDAQ:CRTO) are both mid-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability and risk.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

96.3% of Flex shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.9% of Criteo shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Flex shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.6% of Criteo shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Flex and Criteo's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Criteo has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Flex. Criteo is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Flex, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings for Flex and Criteo, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Flex presently has a consensus target price of $23.1429, suggesting a potential upside of 32.06%. Criteo has a consensus target price of $33.6818, suggesting a potential downside of 6.93%. Given Flex's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Flex is more favorable than Criteo.

Profitability

This table compares Flex and Criteo's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk and Volatility

Flex has a beta of 1.64, suggesting that its stock price is 64% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Criteo has a beta of 1.05, suggesting that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Criteo beats Flex on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Criteo (NASDAQ:CRTO) and Juniper Networks (NYSE:JNPR) are both mid-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, earnings, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

82.9% of Criteo shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.3% of Juniper Networks shares are held by institutional investors. 4.6% of Criteo shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Juniper Networks shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Criteo and Juniper Networks' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Juniper Networks has higher revenue and earnings than Criteo. Criteo is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Juniper Networks, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for Criteo and Juniper Networks, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Criteo currently has a consensus price target of $33.6818, suggesting a potential downside of 6.93%. Juniper Networks has a consensus price target of $25.50, suggesting a potential downside of 4.06%. Given Juniper Networks' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Juniper Networks is more favorable than Criteo.

Profitability

This table compares Criteo and Juniper Networks' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk & Volatility

Criteo has a beta of 1.05, meaning that its share price is 5% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Juniper Networks has a beta of 0.9, meaning that its share price is 10% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Criteo beats Juniper Networks on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Criteo (NASDAQ:CRTO) and Globant (NYSE:GLOB) are both mid-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, earnings, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

82.9% of Criteo shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.0% of Globant shares are held by institutional investors. 4.6% of Criteo shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Criteo and Globant's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Criteo has higher revenue and earnings than Globant. Criteo is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Globant, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for Criteo and Globant, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Criteo currently has a consensus price target of $33.6818, suggesting a potential downside of 6.93%. Globant has a consensus price target of $223.1111, suggesting a potential upside of 3.79%. Given Globant's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Globant is more favorable than Criteo.

Profitability

This table compares Criteo and Globant's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk & Volatility

Criteo has a beta of 1.05, meaning that its share price is 5% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Globant has a beta of 1.24, meaning that its share price is 24% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Globant beats Criteo on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Criteo (NASDAQ:CRTO) and Manhattan Associates (NASDAQ:MANH) are both mid-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, earnings, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

82.9% of Criteo shares are held by institutional investors. 4.6% of Criteo shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Manhattan Associates shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Criteo and Manhattan Associates' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Criteo has higher revenue and earnings than Manhattan Associates. Criteo is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Manhattan Associates, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for Criteo and Manhattan Associates, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Criteo currently has a consensus price target of $33.6818, suggesting a potential downside of 6.93%. Manhattan Associates has a consensus price target of $143.5714, suggesting a potential upside of 7.36%. Given Manhattan Associates' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Manhattan Associates is more favorable than Criteo.

Profitability

This table compares Criteo and Manhattan Associates' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk & Volatility

Criteo has a beta of 1.05, meaning that its share price is 5% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Manhattan Associates has a beta of 1.93, meaning that its share price is 93% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Manhattan Associates beats Criteo on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Criteo (NASDAQ:CRTO) and Kingsoft Cloud (NASDAQ:KC) are both mid-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, earnings, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

82.9% of Criteo shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.4% of Kingsoft Cloud shares are held by institutional investors. 4.6% of Criteo shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Criteo and Kingsoft Cloud's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Criteo has higher revenue and earnings than Kingsoft Cloud.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for Criteo and Kingsoft Cloud, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Criteo currently has a consensus price target of $33.6818, suggesting a potential downside of 6.93%. Kingsoft Cloud has a consensus price target of $38.6667, suggesting a potential upside of 2.70%. Given Kingsoft Cloud's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Kingsoft Cloud is more favorable than Criteo.

Profitability

This table compares Criteo and Kingsoft Cloud's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Criteo beats Kingsoft Cloud on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.