Kosmos Energy (KOS) Competitors

Chord Energy has a net margin of 13.42% compared to Kosmos Energy's net margin of -33.98%. Chord Energy's return on equity of 10.18% beat Kosmos Energy's return on equity.

Kosmos Energy has a beta of 0.72, suggesting that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chord Energy has a beta of 0.48, suggesting that its stock price is 52% less volatile than the broader market.

Kosmos Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.1810 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.2%. Chord Energy pays an annual dividend of $5.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Kosmos Energy pays out -15.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Chord Energy pays out 34.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Chord Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Kosmos Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

95.3% of Kosmos Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.8% of Chord Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.9% of Kosmos Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Chord Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Chord Energy had 7 more articles in the media than Kosmos Energy. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Chord Energy and 12 mentions for Kosmos Energy. Kosmos Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat Chord Energy's score of 0.86 indicating that Kosmos Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Chord Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Kosmos Energy. Kosmos Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chord Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Kosmos Energy currently has a consensus target price of $2.53, suggesting a potential upside of 0.74%. Chord Energy has a consensus target price of $152.08, suggesting a potential upside of 9.79%. Given Chord Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Chord Energy is more favorable than Kosmos Energy.

90.0% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.3% of Kosmos Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of Kosmos Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Diamondback Energy had 28 more articles in the media than Kosmos Energy. MarketBeat recorded 40 mentions for Diamondback Energy and 12 mentions for Kosmos Energy. Diamondback Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat Kosmos Energy's score of 0.98 indicating that Diamondback Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Diamondback Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Kosmos Energy. Kosmos Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diamondback Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Diamondback Energy has a net margin of 8.58% compared to Kosmos Energy's net margin of -33.98%. Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 10.10% beat Kosmos Energy's return on equity.

Diamondback Energy pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Kosmos Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.1810 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.2%. Diamondback Energy pays out 85.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Kosmos Energy pays out -15.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Diamondback Energy has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years. Kosmos Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Diamondback Energy has a beta of 0.43, meaning that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kosmos Energy has a beta of 0.72, meaning that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

Diamondback Energy currently has a consensus price target of $222.30, suggesting a potential upside of 11.73%. Kosmos Energy has a consensus price target of $2.53, suggesting a potential upside of 0.74%. Given Diamondback Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Diamondback Energy is more favorable than Kosmos Energy.

95.3% of Kosmos Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 78.3% of Murphy Oil shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.9% of Kosmos Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.8% of Murphy Oil shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Murphy Oil had 6 more articles in the media than Kosmos Energy. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Murphy Oil and 12 mentions for Kosmos Energy. Kosmos Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat Murphy Oil's score of 0.52 indicating that Kosmos Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Murphy Oil has higher revenue and earnings than Kosmos Energy. Kosmos Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Murphy Oil, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Kosmos Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.1810 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.2%. Murphy Oil pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Kosmos Energy pays out -15.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Murphy Oil pays out 69.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Murphy Oil has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Kosmos Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Kosmos Energy presently has a consensus price target of $2.53, indicating a potential upside of 0.74%. Murphy Oil has a consensus price target of $37.67, indicating a potential upside of 6.22%. Given Murphy Oil's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Murphy Oil is more favorable than Kosmos Energy.

Murphy Oil has a net margin of 9.74% compared to Kosmos Energy's net margin of -33.98%. Murphy Oil's return on equity of 6.63% beat Kosmos Energy's return on equity.

Kosmos Energy has a beta of 0.72, indicating that its share price is 28% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Murphy Oil has a beta of 0.5, indicating that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

Northern Oil and Gas pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.7%. Kosmos Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.1810 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.2%. Northern Oil and Gas pays out -34.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Kosmos Energy pays out -15.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Northern Oil and Gas has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Northern Oil and Gas is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Northern Oil and Gas has a beta of 0.7, suggesting that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kosmos Energy has a beta of 0.72, suggesting that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

Northern Oil and Gas presently has a consensus target price of $30.63, indicating a potential upside of 30.65%. Kosmos Energy has a consensus target price of $2.53, indicating a potential upside of 0.74%. Given Northern Oil and Gas' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Northern Oil and Gas is more favorable than Kosmos Energy.

98.8% of Northern Oil and Gas shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.3% of Kosmos Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.8% of Northern Oil and Gas shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of Kosmos Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Northern Oil and Gas had 1 more articles in the media than Kosmos Energy. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Northern Oil and Gas and 12 mentions for Kosmos Energy. Kosmos Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat Northern Oil and Gas' score of 0.26 indicating that Kosmos Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Northern Oil and Gas has a net margin of -25.35% compared to Kosmos Energy's net margin of -33.98%. Northern Oil and Gas' return on equity of 18.69% beat Kosmos Energy's return on equity.

Northern Oil and Gas has higher revenue and earnings than Kosmos Energy. Northern Oil and Gas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kosmos Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.