Quaker Houghton (KWR) Competitors

UFP Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Quaker Houghton. UFP Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quaker Houghton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Quaker Houghton pays an annual dividend of $2.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. UFP Industries pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Quaker Houghton pays out 36.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. UFP Industries pays out 33.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Quaker Houghton has increased its dividend for 17 consecutive years and UFP Industries has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years. UFP Industries is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, UFP Industries had 6 more articles in the media than Quaker Houghton. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for UFP Industries and 4 mentions for Quaker Houghton. Quaker Houghton's average media sentiment score of 0.36 beat UFP Industries' score of 0.05 indicating that Quaker Houghton is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Quaker Houghton has a net margin of 4.94% compared to UFP Industries' net margin of 3.99%. Quaker Houghton's return on equity of 9.55% beat UFP Industries' return on equity.

77.5% of Quaker Houghton shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.8% of UFP Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Quaker Houghton shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.5% of UFP Industries shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Quaker Houghton currently has a consensus target price of $187.00, indicating a potential upside of 15.83%. UFP Industries has a consensus target price of $104.50, indicating a potential upside of 35.20%. Given UFP Industries' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe UFP Industries is more favorable than Quaker Houghton.

Quaker Houghton has a beta of 1.4, indicating that its share price is 40% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, UFP Industries has a beta of 1.22, indicating that its share price is 22% more volatile than the broader market.

Avient has a net margin of 5.10% compared to Quaker Houghton's net margin of 4.94%. Avient's return on equity of 11.64% beat Quaker Houghton's return on equity.

Quaker Houghton pays an annual dividend of $2.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Avient pays an annual dividend of $1.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Quaker Houghton pays out 36.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Avient pays out 59.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Quaker Houghton has increased its dividend for 17 consecutive years and Avient has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

77.5% of Quaker Houghton shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.5% of Avient shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Quaker Houghton shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Avient shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Quaker Houghton has a beta of 1.4, suggesting that its share price is 40% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Avient has a beta of 1.28, suggesting that its share price is 28% more volatile than the broader market.

Avient has higher revenue and earnings than Quaker Houghton. Avient is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quaker Houghton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Quaker Houghton currently has a consensus price target of $187.00, indicating a potential upside of 15.83%. Avient has a consensus price target of $46.71, indicating a potential upside of 12.08%. Given Quaker Houghton's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Quaker Houghton is more favorable than Avient.

In the previous week, Avient had 3 more articles in the media than Quaker Houghton. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Avient and 4 mentions for Quaker Houghton. Avient's average media sentiment score of 0.50 beat Quaker Houghton's score of 0.36 indicating that Avient is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Quaker Houghton presently has a consensus target price of $187.00, suggesting a potential upside of 15.83%. Brunswick has a consensus target price of $88.00, suggesting a potential upside of 32.87%. Given Brunswick's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Brunswick is more favorable than Quaker Houghton.

Quaker Houghton has a beta of 1.4, suggesting that its stock price is 40% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brunswick has a beta of 1.38, suggesting that its stock price is 38% more volatile than the broader market.

Quaker Houghton has a net margin of 4.94% compared to Brunswick's net margin of -1.53%. Brunswick's return on equity of 15.28% beat Quaker Houghton's return on equity.

77.5% of Quaker Houghton shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.3% of Brunswick shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Quaker Houghton shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Brunswick shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Quaker Houghton pays an annual dividend of $2.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Brunswick pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Quaker Houghton pays out 36.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Brunswick pays out -134.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Quaker Houghton has increased its dividend for 17 consecutive years and Brunswick has increased its dividend for 13 consecutive years. Brunswick is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Quaker Houghton has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Brunswick. Brunswick is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quaker Houghton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Brunswick had 3 more articles in the media than Quaker Houghton. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Brunswick and 4 mentions for Quaker Houghton. Brunswick's average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat Quaker Houghton's score of 0.36 indicating that Brunswick is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

H. B. Fuller has higher revenue and earnings than Quaker Houghton. H. B. Fuller is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quaker Houghton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

H. B. Fuller pays an annual dividend of $0.98 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Quaker Houghton pays an annual dividend of $2.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. H. B. Fuller pays out 27.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Quaker Houghton pays out 36.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. H. B. Fuller has raised its dividend for 57 consecutive years and Quaker Houghton has raised its dividend for 17 consecutive years. H. B. Fuller is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

95.9% of H. B. Fuller shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.5% of Quaker Houghton shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.8% of H. B. Fuller shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Quaker Houghton shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

H. B. Fuller has a net margin of 5.56% compared to Quaker Houghton's net margin of 4.94%. H. B. Fuller's return on equity of 12.65% beat Quaker Houghton's return on equity.

In the previous week, H. B. Fuller had 47 more articles in the media than Quaker Houghton. MarketBeat recorded 51 mentions for H. B. Fuller and 4 mentions for Quaker Houghton. H. B. Fuller's average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat Quaker Houghton's score of 0.36 indicating that H. B. Fuller is being referred to more favorably in the media.

H. B. Fuller has a beta of 0.99, suggesting that its share price is 1% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quaker Houghton has a beta of 1.4, suggesting that its share price is 40% more volatile than the broader market.

H. B. Fuller currently has a consensus price target of $64.63, indicating a potential upside of 27.77%. Quaker Houghton has a consensus price target of $187.00, indicating a potential upside of 15.83%. Given H. B. Fuller's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe H. B. Fuller is more favorable than Quaker Houghton.