Do analysts prefer KWR or IOSP?

Quaker Houghton presently has a consensus target price of $174.67, indicating a potential upside of 9.17%. Given Quaker Houghton's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Quaker Houghton is more favorable than Innospec. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Quaker Houghton 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 4 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50 Innospec 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Does the media prefer KWR or IOSP?

In the previous week, Quaker Houghton had 15 more articles in the media than Innospec. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Quaker Houghton and 4 mentions for Innospec. Quaker Houghton's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Innospec's score of 0.80 indicating that Quaker Houghton is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Quaker Houghton 6 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Innospec 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has higher earnings and valuation, NDSN or KWR?

Nordson has higher revenue and earnings than Quaker Houghton. Nordson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quaker Houghton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Nordson $2.79B 5.94 $484.47M $9.38 31.75 Quaker Houghton $1.89B 1.46 -$2.49M $0.28 571.43

Does the media favor NDSN or KWR?

In the previous week, Quaker Houghton had 9 more articles in the media than Nordson. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Quaker Houghton and 10 mentions for Nordson. Nordson's average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat Quaker Houghton's score of 0.84 indicating that Nordson is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Nordson 9 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Quaker Houghton 6 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, AVNT or KWR?

Avient has higher revenue and earnings than Quaker Houghton. Avient is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quaker Houghton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Avient $3.26B 1.02 $81.90M $1.72 21.12 Quaker Houghton $1.89B 1.46 -$2.49M $0.28 571.43

Does the media prefer AVNT or KWR?

In the previous week, Quaker Houghton had 15 more articles in the media than Avient. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Quaker Houghton and 4 mentions for Avient. Avient's average media sentiment score of 1.07 beat Quaker Houghton's score of 0.84 indicating that Avient is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Avient 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Quaker Houghton 6 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to BC or KWR?

In the previous week, Brunswick had 6 more articles in the media than Quaker Houghton. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for Brunswick and 19 mentions for Quaker Houghton. Brunswick's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Quaker Houghton's score of 0.84 indicating that Brunswick is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Brunswick 14 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 8 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Quaker Houghton 6 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has higher valuation & earnings, KWR or FUL?

H. B. Fuller has higher revenue and earnings than Quaker Houghton. H. B. Fuller is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quaker Houghton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Quaker Houghton $1.89B 1.46 -$2.49M $0.28 571.43 H. B. Fuller $3.47B 0.86 $151.97M $3.26 16.96

Does the media favor KWR or FUL?

In the previous week, Quaker Houghton had 16 more articles in the media than H. B. Fuller. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Quaker Houghton and 3 mentions for H. B. Fuller. H. B. Fuller's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Quaker Houghton's score of 0.84 indicating that H. B. Fuller is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Quaker Houghton 6 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive H. B. Fuller 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Quaker Houghton (KWR) Competitors

$160.00 +5.08 (+3.28%)

Closing price 07/31/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$160.50 +0.49 (+0.31%)

As of 07/31/2026 07:34 PM Eastern

Compare

KWR vs. IOSP, NDSN, AVNT, BC, and FUL

Should you buy Quaker Houghton stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Quaker Houghton with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Quaker Houghton include Innospec (IOSP), Nordson (NDSN), Avient (AVNT), Brunswick (BC), and H. B. Fuller (FUL).

How does Quaker Houghton compare to Innospec?

Quaker Houghton (NYSE:KWR) and Innospec (NASDAQ:IOSP) are both mid-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends and risk.

Innospec has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Quaker Houghton. Innospec is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quaker Houghton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Quaker Houghton	$1.89B	1.46	-$2.49M	$0.28	571.43
Innospec	$1.78B	1.19	$116.60M	$4.59	18.73

Quaker Houghton pays an annual dividend of $2.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Innospec pays an annual dividend of $1.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Quaker Houghton pays out 725.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Innospec pays out 40.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Quaker Houghton has raised its dividend for 17 consecutive years and Innospec has raised its dividend for 11 consecutive years. Innospec is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Quaker Houghton had 15 more articles in the media than Innospec. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Quaker Houghton and 4 mentions for Innospec. Quaker Houghton's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Innospec's score of 0.80 indicating that Quaker Houghton is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Quaker Houghton	6 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Innospec	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

77.5% of Quaker Houghton shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.6% of Innospec shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Quaker Houghton shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Innospec shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Innospec has a net margin of 6.38% compared to Quaker Houghton's net margin of 4.94%. Quaker Houghton's return on equity of 9.55% beat Innospec's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Quaker Houghton	4.94%	9.55%	4.66%
Innospec	6.38%	9.32%	6.79%

Quaker Houghton presently has a consensus target price of $174.67, indicating a potential upside of 9.17%. Given Quaker Houghton's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Quaker Houghton is more favorable than Innospec.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Quaker Houghton	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Innospec	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Quaker Houghton has a beta of 1.4, indicating that its share price is 40% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Innospec has a beta of 0.93, indicating that its share price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Quaker Houghton beats Innospec on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quaker Houghton compare to Nordson?

Nordson (NASDAQ:NDSN) and Quaker Houghton (NYSE:KWR) are related companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Nordson has higher revenue and earnings than Quaker Houghton. Nordson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quaker Houghton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Nordson	$2.79B	5.94	$484.47M	$9.38	31.75
Quaker Houghton	$1.89B	1.46	-$2.49M	$0.28	571.43

Nordson pays an annual dividend of $3.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Quaker Houghton pays an annual dividend of $2.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Nordson pays out 35.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Quaker Houghton pays out 725.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Nordson has increased its dividend for 62 consecutive years and Quaker Houghton has increased its dividend for 17 consecutive years.

Nordson has a beta of 0.96, meaning that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quaker Houghton has a beta of 1.4, meaning that its stock price is 40% more volatile than the broader market.

72.1% of Nordson shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.5% of Quaker Houghton shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Nordson shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Quaker Houghton shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Quaker Houghton had 9 more articles in the media than Nordson. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Quaker Houghton and 10 mentions for Nordson. Nordson's average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat Quaker Houghton's score of 0.84 indicating that Nordson is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Nordson	9 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Quaker Houghton	6 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Nordson has a net margin of 18.19% compared to Quaker Houghton's net margin of 4.94%. Nordson's return on equity of 20.08% beat Quaker Houghton's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Nordson	18.19%	20.08%	10.39%
Quaker Houghton	4.94%	9.55%	4.66%

Nordson currently has a consensus target price of $311.29, indicating a potential upside of 4.54%. Quaker Houghton has a consensus target price of $174.67, indicating a potential upside of 9.17%. Given Quaker Houghton's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Quaker Houghton is more favorable than Nordson.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Nordson	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.63
Quaker Houghton	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Summary

Nordson beats Quaker Houghton on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quaker Houghton compare to Avient?

Avient (NYSE:AVNT) and Quaker Houghton (NYSE:KWR) are both mid-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Quaker Houghton had 15 more articles in the media than Avient. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Quaker Houghton and 4 mentions for Avient. Avient's average media sentiment score of 1.07 beat Quaker Houghton's score of 0.84 indicating that Avient is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Avient	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Quaker Houghton	6 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

95.5% of Avient shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.5% of Quaker Houghton shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Avient shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Quaker Houghton shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Quaker Houghton has a net margin of 4.94% compared to Avient's net margin of 4.81%. Avient's return on equity of 11.11% beat Quaker Houghton's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Avient	4.81%	11.11%	4.40%
Quaker Houghton	4.94%	9.55%	4.66%

Avient has a beta of 1.27, suggesting that its share price is 27% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quaker Houghton has a beta of 1.4, suggesting that its share price is 40% more volatile than the broader market.

Avient pays an annual dividend of $1.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Quaker Houghton pays an annual dividend of $2.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Avient pays out 64.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Quaker Houghton pays out 725.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Avient has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Quaker Houghton has increased its dividend for 17 consecutive years. Avient is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Avient has higher revenue and earnings than Quaker Houghton. Avient is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quaker Houghton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Avient	$3.26B	1.02	$81.90M	$1.72	21.12
Quaker Houghton	$1.89B	1.46	-$2.49M	$0.28	571.43

Avient currently has a consensus price target of $45.71, indicating a potential upside of 25.82%. Quaker Houghton has a consensus price target of $174.67, indicating a potential upside of 9.17%. Given Avient's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Avient is more favorable than Quaker Houghton.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Avient	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.43
Quaker Houghton	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Summary

Quaker Houghton beats Avient on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quaker Houghton compare to Brunswick?

Brunswick (NYSE:BC) and Quaker Houghton (NYSE:KWR) are related mid-cap companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, earnings and risk.

Quaker Houghton has a net margin of 4.94% compared to Brunswick's net margin of -1.53%. Brunswick's return on equity of 15.28% beat Quaker Houghton's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Brunswick	-1.53%	15.28%	4.60%
Quaker Houghton	4.94%	9.55%	4.66%

Quaker Houghton has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Brunswick. Brunswick is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quaker Houghton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Brunswick	$5.36B	0.96	-$137.30M	-$2.10	N/A
Quaker Houghton	$1.89B	1.46	-$2.49M	$0.28	571.43

99.3% of Brunswick shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.5% of Quaker Houghton shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Brunswick shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Quaker Houghton shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Brunswick presently has a consensus target price of $87.57, indicating a potential upside of 10.51%. Quaker Houghton has a consensus target price of $174.67, indicating a potential upside of 9.17%. Given Brunswick's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Brunswick is more favorable than Quaker Houghton.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Brunswick	1 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.47
Quaker Houghton	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Brunswick pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Quaker Houghton pays an annual dividend of $2.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Brunswick pays out -83.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Quaker Houghton pays out 725.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Brunswick has raised its dividend for 13 consecutive years and Quaker Houghton has raised its dividend for 17 consecutive years. Brunswick is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Brunswick has a beta of 1.33, suggesting that its share price is 33% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quaker Houghton has a beta of 1.4, suggesting that its share price is 40% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Brunswick had 6 more articles in the media than Quaker Houghton. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for Brunswick and 19 mentions for Quaker Houghton. Brunswick's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Quaker Houghton's score of 0.84 indicating that Brunswick is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Brunswick	14 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	8 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Quaker Houghton	6 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Brunswick and Quaker Houghton tied by winning 10 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quaker Houghton compare to H. B. Fuller?

Quaker Houghton (NYSE:KWR) and H. B. Fuller (NYSE:FUL) are both mid-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

77.5% of Quaker Houghton shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.9% of H. B. Fuller shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Quaker Houghton shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of H. B. Fuller shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Quaker Houghton pays an annual dividend of $2.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. H. B. Fuller pays an annual dividend of $0.98 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Quaker Houghton pays out 725.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. H. B. Fuller pays out 30.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Quaker Houghton has increased its dividend for 17 consecutive years and H. B. Fuller has increased its dividend for 57 consecutive years. H. B. Fuller is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Quaker Houghton had 16 more articles in the media than H. B. Fuller. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Quaker Houghton and 3 mentions for H. B. Fuller. H. B. Fuller's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Quaker Houghton's score of 0.84 indicating that H. B. Fuller is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Quaker Houghton	6 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
H. B. Fuller	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Quaker Houghton has a beta of 1.4, indicating that its share price is 40% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, H. B. Fuller has a beta of 0.98, indicating that its share price is 2% less volatile than the broader market.

H. B. Fuller has a net margin of 5.29% compared to Quaker Houghton's net margin of 4.94%. H. B. Fuller's return on equity of 12.18% beat Quaker Houghton's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Quaker Houghton	4.94%	9.55%	4.66%
H. B. Fuller	5.29%	12.18%	4.73%

H. B. Fuller has higher revenue and earnings than Quaker Houghton. H. B. Fuller is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quaker Houghton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Quaker Houghton	$1.89B	1.46	-$2.49M	$0.28	571.43
H. B. Fuller	$3.47B	0.86	$151.97M	$3.26	16.96

Quaker Houghton presently has a consensus price target of $174.67, suggesting a potential upside of 9.17%. H. B. Fuller has a consensus price target of $67.86, suggesting a potential upside of 22.70%. Given H. B. Fuller's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe H. B. Fuller is more favorable than Quaker Houghton.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Quaker Houghton	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
H. B. Fuller	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.83

Summary

H. B. Fuller beats Quaker Houghton on 15 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Quaker Houghton News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding KWR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

KWR vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Quaker Houghton	Chemicals Industry	Materials Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$2.76B	$11.17B	$4.60B	$23.69B
Dividend Yield	1.27%	2.85%	4.76%	4.22%
P/E Ratio	28.52	21.15	20.11	30.98
Price / Sales	1.46	50.70	4,733.62	19.22
Price / Cash	12.50	14.97	24.35	18.73
Price / Book	2.02	3.56	8.19	4.76
Net Income	-$2.49M	$223.51M	$155.10M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	5.92%	0.14%	-0.58%	0.35%
1 Month Performance	-0.49%	0.13%	-3.10%	-0.55%
1 Year Performance	35.91%	20.90%	37.88%	19.21%

Quaker Houghton Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
KWR Quaker Houghton	3.9214 of 5 stars	$160.00 +3.3%	$174.67 +9.2%	+35.9%	$2.76B	$1.89B	28.52	4,700	Trending News Earnings Report Dividend Increase Analyst Upgrade Gap Up
IOSP Innospec	3.6497 of 5 stars	$87.29 +1.9%	N/A	+9.5%	$2.15B	$1.78B	19.02	2,450	Upcoming Earnings
NDSN Nordson	4.1989 of 5 stars	$302.43 +1.7%	$311.29 +2.9%	+42.3%	$16.85B	$2.90B	32.23	8,000	News Coverage Positive News
AVNT Avient	4.1108 of 5 stars	$37.75 +3.6%	$45.71 +21.1%	+7.6%	$3.47B	$3.28B	21.97	9,000	News Coverage Positive News Upcoming Earnings
BC Brunswick	3.6981 of 5 stars	$83.20 +3.2%	$87.07 +4.7%	+40.0%	$5.40B	$5.52B	N/A	14,000	Trending News Earnings Report Analyst Forecast

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:KWR) was last updated on 8/2/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Quaker Houghton (KWR) Competitors

KWR vs. IOSP, NDSN, AVNT, BC, and FUL

How does Quaker Houghton compare to Innospec?

Summary

How does Quaker Houghton compare to Nordson?

Summary

How does Quaker Houghton compare to Avient?

Summary

How does Quaker Houghton compare to Brunswick?

Summary

How does Quaker Houghton compare to H. B. Fuller?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

KWR vs. The Competition

Quaker Houghton Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Quaker Houghton (KWR) Competitors

KWR vs. IOSP, NDSN, AVNT, BC, and FUL

How does Quaker Houghton compare to Innospec?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, KWR or IOSP?

Is KWR or IOSP a better dividend stock?

Does the media prefer KWR or IOSP?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of KWR or IOSP?

Is KWR or IOSP more profitable?

Do analysts prefer KWR or IOSP?

Which has more risk and volatility, KWR or IOSP?

Summary

How does Quaker Houghton compare to Nordson?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, NDSN or KWR?

Is NDSN or KWR a better dividend stock?

Which has more volatility & risk, NDSN or KWR?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in NDSN or KWR?

Does the media favor NDSN or KWR?

Is NDSN or KWR more profitable?

Do analysts recommend NDSN or KWR?

Summary

How does Quaker Houghton compare to Avient?

Does the media prefer AVNT or KWR?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of AVNT or KWR?

Is AVNT or KWR more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, AVNT or KWR?

Is AVNT or KWR a better dividend stock?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, AVNT or KWR?

Do analysts prefer AVNT or KWR?

Summary

How does Quaker Houghton compare to Brunswick?

Is BC or KWR more profitable?

Which has better valuation & earnings, BC or KWR?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in BC or KWR?

Do analysts recommend BC or KWR?

Is BC or KWR a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk & volatility, BC or KWR?

Does the media refer more to BC or KWR?

Summary

How does Quaker Houghton compare to H. B. Fuller?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in KWR or FUL?

Is KWR or FUL a better dividend stock?

Does the media favor KWR or FUL?

Which has more volatility and risk, KWR or FUL?

Is KWR or FUL more profitable?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, KWR or FUL?

Do analysts rate KWR or FUL?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

KWR vs. The Competition

Quaker Houghton Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools