Quaker Houghton (KWR) Competitors

Nordson presently has a consensus price target of $326.57, indicating a potential downside of 1.71%. Quaker Houghton has a consensus price target of $187.67, indicating a potential upside of 15.17%. Given Quaker Houghton's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Quaker Houghton is more favorable than Nordson.

Nordson has a beta of 0.96, meaning that its share price is 4% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quaker Houghton has a beta of 1.4, meaning that its share price is 40% more volatile than the broader market.

Nordson pays an annual dividend of $3.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Quaker Houghton pays an annual dividend of $2.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Nordson pays out 33.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Quaker Houghton pays out 36.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Nordson has increased its dividend for 62 consecutive years and Quaker Houghton has increased its dividend for 17 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Nordson had 33 more articles in the media than Quaker Houghton. MarketBeat recorded 39 mentions for Nordson and 6 mentions for Quaker Houghton. Quaker Houghton's average media sentiment score of 1.68 beat Nordson's score of 0.89 indicating that Quaker Houghton is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

72.1% of Nordson shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.5% of Quaker Houghton shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Nordson shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Quaker Houghton shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Nordson has higher revenue and earnings than Quaker Houghton. Quaker Houghton is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nordson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Nordson has a net margin of 18.63% compared to Quaker Houghton's net margin of 4.94%. Nordson's return on equity of 20.49% beat Quaker Houghton's return on equity.

Avient pays an annual dividend of $1.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Quaker Houghton pays an annual dividend of $2.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Avient pays out 59.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Quaker Houghton pays out 36.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Avient has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Quaker Houghton has raised its dividend for 17 consecutive years.

95.5% of Avient shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.5% of Quaker Houghton shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Avient shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Quaker Houghton shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Avient has higher revenue and earnings than Quaker Houghton. Avient is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quaker Houghton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Quaker Houghton had 4 more articles in the media than Avient. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Quaker Houghton and 2 mentions for Avient. Quaker Houghton's average media sentiment score of 1.68 beat Avient's score of 1.54 indicating that Quaker Houghton is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Avient has a beta of 1.27, suggesting that its share price is 27% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quaker Houghton has a beta of 1.4, suggesting that its share price is 40% more volatile than the broader market.

Avient has a net margin of 5.10% compared to Quaker Houghton's net margin of 4.94%. Avient's return on equity of 11.64% beat Quaker Houghton's return on equity.

Avient currently has a consensus target price of $46.71, indicating a potential upside of 4.69%. Quaker Houghton has a consensus target price of $187.67, indicating a potential upside of 15.17%. Given Quaker Houghton's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Quaker Houghton is more favorable than Avient.

In the previous week, Quaker Houghton had 1 more articles in the media than Brunswick. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Quaker Houghton and 5 mentions for Brunswick. Quaker Houghton's average media sentiment score of 1.68 beat Brunswick's score of 0.71 indicating that Quaker Houghton is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Quaker Houghton has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Brunswick. Brunswick is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quaker Houghton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

99.3% of Brunswick shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.5% of Quaker Houghton shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Brunswick shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Quaker Houghton shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Quaker Houghton has a net margin of 4.94% compared to Brunswick's net margin of -1.53%. Brunswick's return on equity of 15.28% beat Quaker Houghton's return on equity.

Brunswick has a beta of 1.33, suggesting that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quaker Houghton has a beta of 1.4, suggesting that its stock price is 40% more volatile than the broader market.

Brunswick currently has a consensus price target of $88.00, indicating a potential upside of 8.67%. Quaker Houghton has a consensus price target of $187.67, indicating a potential upside of 15.17%. Given Quaker Houghton's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Quaker Houghton is more favorable than Brunswick.

Brunswick pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Quaker Houghton pays an annual dividend of $2.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Brunswick pays out -134.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Quaker Houghton pays out 36.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Brunswick has increased its dividend for 13 consecutive years and Quaker Houghton has increased its dividend for 17 consecutive years. Brunswick is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

H. B. Fuller has higher revenue and earnings than Quaker Houghton. H. B. Fuller is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quaker Houghton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

H. B. Fuller presently has a consensus price target of $67.86, suggesting a potential upside of 15.31%. Quaker Houghton has a consensus price target of $187.67, suggesting a potential upside of 15.17%. Given H. B. Fuller's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe H. B. Fuller is more favorable than Quaker Houghton.

95.9% of H. B. Fuller shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.5% of Quaker Houghton shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of H. B. Fuller shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Quaker Houghton shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Quaker Houghton had 6 more articles in the media than H. B. Fuller. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Quaker Houghton and 0 mentions for H. B. Fuller. H. B. Fuller's average media sentiment score of 1.74 beat Quaker Houghton's score of 1.68 indicating that H. B. Fuller is being referred to more favorably in the media.

H. B. Fuller has a beta of 0.98, meaning that its share price is 2% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quaker Houghton has a beta of 1.4, meaning that its share price is 40% more volatile than the broader market.

H. B. Fuller has a net margin of 5.29% compared to Quaker Houghton's net margin of 4.94%. H. B. Fuller's return on equity of 12.18% beat Quaker Houghton's return on equity.

H. B. Fuller pays an annual dividend of $0.98 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Quaker Houghton pays an annual dividend of $2.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. H. B. Fuller pays out 30.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Quaker Houghton pays out 36.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. H. B. Fuller has increased its dividend for 57 consecutive years and Quaker Houghton has increased its dividend for 17 consecutive years. H. B. Fuller is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.