Go Pro

Quaker Houghton (KWR) Competitors

Quaker Houghton logo
$147.96 -0.21 (-0.14%)
Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$148.08 +0.12 (+0.08%)
As of 06:18 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

KWR vs. IOSP, AVNT, BC, DOV, and FUL

Should you buy Quaker Houghton stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Quaker Houghton with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Quaker Houghton include Innospec (IOSP), Avient (AVNT), Brunswick (BC), Dover (DOV), and H. B. Fuller (FUL).

How does Quaker Houghton compare to Innospec?

Innospec (NASDAQ:IOSP) and Quaker Houghton (NYSE:KWR) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability and media sentiment.

96.6% of Innospec shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.5% of Quaker Houghton shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Innospec shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Quaker Houghton shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Quaker Houghton has a consensus target price of $168.00, suggesting a potential upside of 13.54%. Given Quaker Houghton's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Quaker Houghton is more favorable than Innospec.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Innospec
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Quaker Houghton
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Innospec pays an annual dividend of $1.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Quaker Houghton pays an annual dividend of $2.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Innospec pays out 40.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Quaker Houghton pays out 725.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Innospec has increased its dividend for 11 consecutive years and Quaker Houghton has increased its dividend for 17 consecutive years. Innospec is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Innospec has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Quaker Houghton. Innospec is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quaker Houghton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Innospec$1.79B1.13$116.60M$4.5917.87
Quaker Houghton$1.89B1.36-$2.49M$0.28528.45

Innospec has a beta of 0.93, indicating that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quaker Houghton has a beta of 1.4, indicating that its stock price is 40% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Innospec had 1 more articles in the media than Quaker Houghton. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Innospec and 1 mentions for Quaker Houghton. Innospec's average media sentiment score of 0.47 beat Quaker Houghton's score of 0.30 indicating that Innospec is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Innospec
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Quaker Houghton
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Innospec has a net margin of 6.38% compared to Quaker Houghton's net margin of 0.22%. Innospec's return on equity of 9.32% beat Quaker Houghton's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Innospec6.38% 9.32% 6.79%
Quaker Houghton 0.22%9.03%4.39%

Summary

Innospec beats Quaker Houghton on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quaker Houghton compare to Avient?

Quaker Houghton (NYSE:KWR) and Avient (NYSE:AVNT) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, media sentiment, dividends and risk.

77.5% of Quaker Houghton shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.5% of Avient shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Quaker Houghton shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Avient shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Avient had 2 more articles in the media than Quaker Houghton. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Avient and 1 mentions for Quaker Houghton. Avient's average media sentiment score of 0.78 beat Quaker Houghton's score of 0.30 indicating that Avient is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Quaker Houghton
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Avient
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Quaker Houghton pays an annual dividend of $2.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Avient pays an annual dividend of $1.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Quaker Houghton pays out 725.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Avient pays out 64.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Quaker Houghton has raised its dividend for 17 consecutive years and Avient has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Avient is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Avient has a net margin of 4.81% compared to Quaker Houghton's net margin of 0.22%. Avient's return on equity of 11.11% beat Quaker Houghton's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Quaker Houghton0.22% 9.03% 4.39%
Avient 4.81%11.11%4.40%

Avient has higher revenue and earnings than Quaker Houghton. Avient is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quaker Houghton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Quaker Houghton$1.89B1.36-$2.49M$0.28528.45
Avient$3.26B1.00$81.90M$1.7220.70

Quaker Houghton has a beta of 1.4, suggesting that its share price is 40% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Avient has a beta of 1.27, suggesting that its share price is 27% more volatile than the broader market.

Quaker Houghton presently has a consensus price target of $168.00, suggesting a potential upside of 13.54%. Avient has a consensus price target of $45.71, suggesting a potential upside of 28.39%. Given Avient's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Avient is more favorable than Quaker Houghton.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Quaker Houghton
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Avient
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43

Summary

Avient beats Quaker Houghton on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quaker Houghton compare to Brunswick?

Quaker Houghton (NYSE:KWR) and Brunswick (NYSE:BC) are related mid-cap companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and earnings.

77.5% of Quaker Houghton shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.3% of Brunswick shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Quaker Houghton shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Brunswick shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Quaker Houghton has a beta of 1.4, suggesting that its stock price is 40% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brunswick has a beta of 1.33, suggesting that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Brunswick had 14 more articles in the media than Quaker Houghton. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Brunswick and 1 mentions for Quaker Houghton. Brunswick's average media sentiment score of 0.31 beat Quaker Houghton's score of 0.30 indicating that Brunswick is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Quaker Houghton
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Brunswick
6 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
2 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Quaker Houghton pays an annual dividend of $2.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Brunswick pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Quaker Houghton pays out 725.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Brunswick pays out -83.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Quaker Houghton has increased its dividend for 17 consecutive years and Brunswick has increased its dividend for 13 consecutive years. Brunswick is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Quaker Houghton has a net margin of 0.22% compared to Brunswick's net margin of -2.47%. Brunswick's return on equity of 13.30% beat Quaker Houghton's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Quaker Houghton0.22% 9.03% 4.39%
Brunswick -2.47%13.30%4.09%

Quaker Houghton currently has a consensus price target of $168.00, indicating a potential upside of 13.54%. Brunswick has a consensus price target of $87.07, indicating a potential upside of 13.22%. Given Quaker Houghton's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Quaker Houghton is more favorable than Brunswick.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Quaker Houghton
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Brunswick
1 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.47

Quaker Houghton has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Brunswick. Brunswick is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quaker Houghton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Quaker Houghton$1.89B1.36-$2.49M$0.28528.45
Brunswick$5.36B0.93-$137.30M-$2.10N/A

Summary

Quaker Houghton beats Brunswick on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quaker Houghton compare to Dover?

Quaker Houghton (NYSE:KWR) and Dover (NYSE:DOV) are related companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, earnings, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Quaker Houghton pays an annual dividend of $2.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Dover pays an annual dividend of $2.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Quaker Houghton pays out 725.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Dover pays out 25.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Quaker Houghton has raised its dividend for 17 consecutive years and Dover has raised its dividend for 70 consecutive years.

Dover has higher revenue and earnings than Quaker Houghton. Dover is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quaker Houghton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Quaker Houghton$1.89B1.36-$2.49M$0.28528.45
Dover$8.09B3.57$1.09B$8.0226.74

Quaker Houghton has a beta of 1.4, meaning that its share price is 40% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Dover has a beta of 1.16, meaning that its share price is 16% more volatile than the broader market.

Quaker Houghton currently has a consensus price target of $168.00, indicating a potential upside of 13.54%. Dover has a consensus price target of $241.43, indicating a potential upside of 12.59%. Given Quaker Houghton's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Quaker Houghton is more favorable than Dover.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Quaker Houghton
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Dover
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.53

In the previous week, Dover had 5 more articles in the media than Quaker Houghton. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Dover and 1 mentions for Quaker Houghton. Dover's average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat Quaker Houghton's score of 0.30 indicating that Dover is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Quaker Houghton
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Dover
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Dover has a net margin of 13.30% compared to Quaker Houghton's net margin of 0.22%. Dover's return on equity of 18.01% beat Quaker Houghton's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Quaker Houghton0.22% 9.03% 4.39%
Dover 13.30%18.01%10.10%

77.5% of Quaker Houghton shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.5% of Dover shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Quaker Houghton shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Dover shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Dover beats Quaker Houghton on 15 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quaker Houghton compare to H. B. Fuller?

H. B. Fuller (NYSE:FUL) and Quaker Houghton (NYSE:KWR) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and dividends.

H. B. Fuller has a net margin of 5.29% compared to Quaker Houghton's net margin of 0.22%. H. B. Fuller's return on equity of 12.18% beat Quaker Houghton's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
H. B. Fuller5.29% 12.18% 4.73%
Quaker Houghton 0.22%9.03%4.39%

H. B. Fuller presently has a consensus target price of $67.86, indicating a potential upside of 21.21%. Quaker Houghton has a consensus target price of $168.00, indicating a potential upside of 13.54%. Given H. B. Fuller's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe H. B. Fuller is more favorable than Quaker Houghton.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
H. B. Fuller
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83
Quaker Houghton
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

H. B. Fuller has higher revenue and earnings than Quaker Houghton. H. B. Fuller is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quaker Houghton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
H. B. Fuller$3.47B0.87$151.97M$3.2617.17
Quaker Houghton$1.89B1.36-$2.49M$0.28528.45

95.9% of H. B. Fuller shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.5% of Quaker Houghton shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.8% of H. B. Fuller shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Quaker Houghton shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

H. B. Fuller has a beta of 0.98, meaning that its share price is 2% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quaker Houghton has a beta of 1.4, meaning that its share price is 40% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, H. B. Fuller and H. B. Fuller both had 1 articles in the media. H. B. Fuller's average media sentiment score of 0.40 beat Quaker Houghton's score of 0.30 indicating that H. B. Fuller is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
H. B. Fuller
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Quaker Houghton
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

H. B. Fuller pays an annual dividend of $0.98 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Quaker Houghton pays an annual dividend of $2.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. H. B. Fuller pays out 30.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Quaker Houghton pays out 725.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. H. B. Fuller has increased its dividend for 57 consecutive years and Quaker Houghton has increased its dividend for 17 consecutive years. H. B. Fuller is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

H. B. Fuller beats Quaker Houghton on 15 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Quaker Houghton News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for KWR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding KWR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

KWR vs. The Competition

MetricQuaker HoughtonCHEM IndustryMaterials SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$2.57B$15.87B$4.58B$23.46B
Dividend Yield1.37%2.04%5.03%4.02%
P/E Ratio528.4735.1220.8531.06
Price / Sales1.362.495,824.1919.75
Price / Cash11.5414.5724.1718.64
Price / Book1.864.868.684.77
Net Income-$2.49M$376.31M$157.11M$1.06B
7 Day Performance-7.14%-2.42%-2.62%-0.56%
1 Month Performance2.65%-3.70%-4.45%-0.11%
1 Year Performance13.66%6.99%37.38%16.64%

Quaker Houghton Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
KWR
Quaker Houghton
3.3362 of 5 stars
$147.97
-0.1%
$168.00
+13.5%
+13.6%$2.57B$1.89B528.474,700
IOSP
Innospec
3.1876 of 5 stars
$81.93
-0.6%
N/A-7.5%$2.02B$1.78B17.862,450
AVNT
Avient
4.4864 of 5 stars
$38.55
-0.9%
$45.71
+18.6%
+5.5%$3.54B$3.26B22.419,000
BC
Brunswick
3.665 of 5 stars
$77.99
-1.6%
$87.07
+11.6%
+28.5%$5.08B$5.36BN/A14,000
DOV
Dover
4.3173 of 5 stars
$213.28
-0.7%
$239.85
+12.5%
+14.1%$28.68B$8.09B26.5524,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:KWR) was last updated on 7/13/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners