Quaker Houghton (KWR) Competitors

UFP Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Quaker Houghton. UFP Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quaker Houghton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, UFP Industries had 1 more articles in the media than Quaker Houghton. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for UFP Industries and 2 mentions for Quaker Houghton. Quaker Houghton's average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat UFP Industries' score of 1.14 indicating that Quaker Houghton is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

UFP Industries presently has a consensus target price of $104.50, suggesting a potential upside of 29.72%. Quaker Houghton has a consensus target price of $187.00, suggesting a potential upside of 20.09%. Given UFP Industries' higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe UFP Industries is more favorable than Quaker Houghton.

UFP Industries has a beta of 1.22, suggesting that its share price is 22% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quaker Houghton has a beta of 1.4, suggesting that its share price is 40% more volatile than the broader market.

81.8% of UFP Industries shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.5% of Quaker Houghton shares are held by institutional investors. 2.5% of UFP Industries shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Quaker Houghton shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

UFP Industries pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Quaker Houghton pays an annual dividend of $2.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. UFP Industries pays out 33.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Quaker Houghton pays out 37.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. UFP Industries has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Quaker Houghton has raised its dividend for 17 consecutive years. UFP Industries is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Quaker Houghton has a net margin of 4.94% compared to UFP Industries' net margin of 3.99%. Quaker Houghton's return on equity of 9.55% beat UFP Industries' return on equity.

77.5% of Quaker Houghton shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.5% of Avient shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Quaker Houghton shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Avient shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Avient has a net margin of 5.10% compared to Quaker Houghton's net margin of 4.94%. Avient's return on equity of 11.64% beat Quaker Houghton's return on equity.

Quaker Houghton pays an annual dividend of $2.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Avient pays an annual dividend of $1.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Quaker Houghton pays out 37.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Avient pays out 59.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Quaker Houghton has raised its dividend for 17 consecutive years and Avient has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Avient has higher revenue and earnings than Quaker Houghton. Avient is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quaker Houghton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Quaker Houghton had 2 more articles in the media than Avient. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Quaker Houghton and 0 mentions for Avient. Quaker Houghton's average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat Avient's score of 0.82 indicating that Quaker Houghton is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Quaker Houghton currently has a consensus target price of $187.00, indicating a potential upside of 20.09%. Avient has a consensus target price of $46.71, indicating a potential upside of 12.67%. Given Quaker Houghton's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Quaker Houghton is more favorable than Avient.

Quaker Houghton has a beta of 1.4, indicating that its stock price is 40% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Avient has a beta of 1.29, indicating that its stock price is 29% more volatile than the broader market.

Quaker Houghton has a beta of 1.4, indicating that its share price is 40% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brunswick has a beta of 1.34, indicating that its share price is 34% more volatile than the broader market.

77.5% of Quaker Houghton shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.3% of Brunswick shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Quaker Houghton shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Brunswick shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Quaker Houghton has a net margin of 4.94% compared to Brunswick's net margin of -1.53%. Brunswick's return on equity of 15.28% beat Quaker Houghton's return on equity.

Quaker Houghton pays an annual dividend of $2.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Brunswick pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Quaker Houghton pays out 37.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Brunswick pays out -134.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Quaker Houghton has increased its dividend for 17 consecutive years and Brunswick has increased its dividend for 13 consecutive years. Brunswick is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Quaker Houghton currently has a consensus target price of $187.00, suggesting a potential upside of 20.09%. Brunswick has a consensus target price of $88.00, suggesting a potential upside of 24.51%. Given Brunswick's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Brunswick is more favorable than Quaker Houghton.

Quaker Houghton has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Brunswick. Brunswick is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quaker Houghton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Brunswick had 3 more articles in the media than Quaker Houghton. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Brunswick and 2 mentions for Quaker Houghton. Quaker Houghton's average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat Brunswick's score of 1.11 indicating that Quaker Houghton is being referred to more favorably in the media.

H. B. Fuller has a net margin of 5.29% compared to Quaker Houghton's net margin of 4.94%. H. B. Fuller's return on equity of 12.18% beat Quaker Houghton's return on equity.

In the previous week, H. B. Fuller had 3 more articles in the media than Quaker Houghton. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for H. B. Fuller and 2 mentions for Quaker Houghton. Quaker Houghton's average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat H. B. Fuller's score of 0.26 indicating that Quaker Houghton is being referred to more favorably in the media.

H. B. Fuller has higher revenue and earnings than Quaker Houghton. H. B. Fuller is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quaker Houghton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Quaker Houghton presently has a consensus target price of $187.00, suggesting a potential upside of 20.09%. H. B. Fuller has a consensus target price of $67.86, suggesting a potential upside of 31.14%. Given H. B. Fuller's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe H. B. Fuller is more favorable than Quaker Houghton.

77.5% of Quaker Houghton shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.9% of H. B. Fuller shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Quaker Houghton shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of H. B. Fuller shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Quaker Houghton has a beta of 1.4, meaning that its share price is 40% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, H. B. Fuller has a beta of 0.97, meaning that its share price is 3% less volatile than the broader market.

Quaker Houghton pays an annual dividend of $2.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. H. B. Fuller pays an annual dividend of $0.98 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Quaker Houghton pays out 37.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. H. B. Fuller pays out 30.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Quaker Houghton has increased its dividend for 17 consecutive years and H. B. Fuller has increased its dividend for 57 consecutive years. H. B. Fuller is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.