Free Trial

Quaker Houghton (KWR) Competitors

Quaker Houghton logo
$142.20 -2.04 (-1.41%)
As of 01:18 PM Eastern

KWR vs. IOSP, NDSN, AVNT, BC, and DOV

Should you buy Quaker Houghton stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Quaker Houghton with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Quaker Houghton include Innospec (IOSP), Nordson (NDSN), Avient (AVNT), Brunswick (BC), and Dover (DOV).

How does Quaker Houghton compare to Innospec?

Quaker Houghton (NYSE:KWR) and Innospec (NASDAQ:IOSP) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, profitability and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Quaker Houghton had 2 more articles in the media than Innospec. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Quaker Houghton and 1 mentions for Innospec. Innospec's average media sentiment score of 1.78 beat Quaker Houghton's score of 0.71 indicating that Innospec is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Quaker Houghton Positive
Innospec Very Positive

Quaker Houghton pays an annual dividend of $2.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Innospec pays an annual dividend of $1.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Quaker Houghton pays out 725.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Innospec pays out 40.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Quaker Houghton has raised its dividend for 17 consecutive years and Innospec has raised its dividend for 11 consecutive years. Innospec is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Innospec has a net margin of 6.38% compared to Quaker Houghton's net margin of 0.22%. Innospec's return on equity of 9.32% beat Quaker Houghton's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Quaker Houghton0.22% 9.03% 4.39%
Innospec 6.38%9.32%6.79%

Quaker Houghton presently has a consensus target price of $166.00, indicating a potential upside of 16.74%. Given Quaker Houghton's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Quaker Houghton is more favorable than Innospec.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Quaker Houghton
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40
Innospec
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

77.5% of Quaker Houghton shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.6% of Innospec shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Quaker Houghton shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Innospec shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Innospec has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Quaker Houghton. Innospec is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quaker Houghton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Quaker Houghton$1.89B1.31-$2.49M$0.28507.86
Innospec$1.79B1.12$116.60M$4.5917.68

Quaker Houghton has a beta of 1.43, indicating that its stock price is 43% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Innospec has a beta of 0.92, indicating that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Innospec beats Quaker Houghton on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quaker Houghton compare to Nordson?

Nordson (NASDAQ:NDSN) and Quaker Houghton (NYSE:KWR) are related companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership and risk.

In the previous week, Nordson had 7 more articles in the media than Quaker Houghton. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Nordson and 3 mentions for Quaker Houghton. Nordson's average media sentiment score of 1.24 beat Quaker Houghton's score of 0.71 indicating that Nordson is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Nordson
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Quaker Houghton
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Nordson pays an annual dividend of $3.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Quaker Houghton pays an annual dividend of $2.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Nordson pays out 35.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Quaker Houghton pays out 725.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Nordson has increased its dividend for 62 consecutive years and Quaker Houghton has increased its dividend for 17 consecutive years.

Nordson has higher revenue and earnings than Quaker Houghton. Nordson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quaker Houghton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Nordson$2.79B5.77$484.47M$9.3830.84
Quaker Houghton$1.89B1.31-$2.49M$0.28507.86

Nordson has a beta of 0.97, meaning that its share price is 3% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quaker Houghton has a beta of 1.43, meaning that its share price is 43% more volatile than the broader market.

Nordson presently has a consensus price target of $311.29, indicating a potential upside of 7.61%. Quaker Houghton has a consensus price target of $166.00, indicating a potential upside of 16.74%. Given Quaker Houghton's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Quaker Houghton is more favorable than Nordson.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Nordson
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.56
Quaker Houghton
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

Nordson has a net margin of 18.19% compared to Quaker Houghton's net margin of 0.22%. Nordson's return on equity of 20.08% beat Quaker Houghton's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Nordson18.19% 20.08% 10.39%
Quaker Houghton 0.22%9.03%4.39%

72.1% of Nordson shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.5% of Quaker Houghton shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Nordson shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Quaker Houghton shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Nordson beats Quaker Houghton on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quaker Houghton compare to Avient?

Quaker Houghton (NYSE:KWR) and Avient (NYSE:AVNT) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, earnings, dividends and risk.

Avient has higher revenue and earnings than Quaker Houghton. Avient is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quaker Houghton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Quaker Houghton$1.89B1.31-$2.49M$0.28507.86
Avient$3.26B0.98$81.90M$1.7220.23

In the previous week, Quaker Houghton had 1 more articles in the media than Avient. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Quaker Houghton and 2 mentions for Avient. Avient's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Quaker Houghton's score of 0.71 indicating that Avient is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Quaker Houghton
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Avient
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Quaker Houghton pays an annual dividend of $2.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Avient pays an annual dividend of $1.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Quaker Houghton pays out 725.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Avient pays out 64.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Quaker Houghton has increased its dividend for 17 consecutive years and Avient has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Avient is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Quaker Houghton presently has a consensus price target of $166.00, indicating a potential upside of 16.74%. Avient has a consensus price target of $46.40, indicating a potential upside of 33.37%. Given Avient's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Avient is more favorable than Quaker Houghton.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Quaker Houghton
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40
Avient
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

77.5% of Quaker Houghton shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.5% of Avient shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Quaker Houghton shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Avient shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Avient has a net margin of 4.81% compared to Quaker Houghton's net margin of 0.22%. Avient's return on equity of 11.11% beat Quaker Houghton's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Quaker Houghton0.22% 9.03% 4.39%
Avient 4.81%11.11%4.40%

Quaker Houghton has a beta of 1.43, indicating that its share price is 43% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Avient has a beta of 1.28, indicating that its share price is 28% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Avient beats Quaker Houghton on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quaker Houghton compare to Brunswick?

Brunswick (NYSE:BC) and Quaker Houghton (NYSE:KWR) are related mid-cap companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment and dividends.

Brunswick presently has a consensus price target of $87.00, suggesting a potential upside of 6.18%. Quaker Houghton has a consensus price target of $166.00, suggesting a potential upside of 16.74%. Given Quaker Houghton's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Quaker Houghton is more favorable than Brunswick.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Brunswick
1 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.47
Quaker Houghton
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

Brunswick pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Quaker Houghton pays an annual dividend of $2.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Brunswick pays out -83.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Quaker Houghton pays out 725.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Brunswick has increased its dividend for 13 consecutive years and Quaker Houghton has increased its dividend for 17 consecutive years. Brunswick is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

99.3% of Brunswick shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.5% of Quaker Houghton shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Brunswick shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Quaker Houghton shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Quaker Houghton has a net margin of 0.22% compared to Brunswick's net margin of -2.47%. Brunswick's return on equity of 13.30% beat Quaker Houghton's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Brunswick-2.47% 13.30% 4.09%
Quaker Houghton 0.22%9.03%4.39%

In the previous week, Brunswick had 4 more articles in the media than Quaker Houghton. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Brunswick and 3 mentions for Quaker Houghton. Brunswick's average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat Quaker Houghton's score of 0.71 indicating that Brunswick is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Brunswick
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Quaker Houghton
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Quaker Houghton has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Brunswick. Brunswick is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quaker Houghton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Brunswick$5.52B0.96-$137.30M-$2.10N/A
Quaker Houghton$1.89B1.31-$2.49M$0.28507.86

Brunswick has a beta of 1.33, suggesting that its share price is 33% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quaker Houghton has a beta of 1.43, suggesting that its share price is 43% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Brunswick and Quaker Houghton tied by winning 10 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quaker Houghton compare to Dover?

Dover (NYSE:DOV) and Quaker Houghton (NYSE:KWR) are related companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, earnings and institutional ownership.

Dover presently has a consensus price target of $237.36, indicating a potential upside of 9.95%. Quaker Houghton has a consensus price target of $166.00, indicating a potential upside of 16.74%. Given Quaker Houghton's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Quaker Houghton is more favorable than Dover.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Dover
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.53
Quaker Houghton
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

In the previous week, Dover had 1 more articles in the media than Quaker Houghton. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Dover and 3 mentions for Quaker Houghton. Dover's average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat Quaker Houghton's score of 0.71 indicating that Dover is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Dover
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Quaker Houghton
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Dover has a net margin of 13.30% compared to Quaker Houghton's net margin of 0.22%. Dover's return on equity of 18.01% beat Quaker Houghton's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Dover13.30% 18.01% 10.10%
Quaker Houghton 0.22%9.03%4.39%

Dover has a beta of 1.17, indicating that its share price is 17% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quaker Houghton has a beta of 1.43, indicating that its share price is 43% more volatile than the broader market.

Dover has higher revenue and earnings than Quaker Houghton. Dover is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quaker Houghton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Dover$8.28B3.51$1.09B$8.0226.92
Quaker Houghton$1.89B1.31-$2.49M$0.28507.86

Dover pays an annual dividend of $2.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Quaker Houghton pays an annual dividend of $2.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Dover pays out 25.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Quaker Houghton pays out 725.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Dover has raised its dividend for 70 consecutive years and Quaker Houghton has raised its dividend for 17 consecutive years.

84.5% of Dover shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.5% of Quaker Houghton shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Dover shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Quaker Houghton shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Dover beats Quaker Houghton on 15 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Quaker Houghton News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for KWR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding KWR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

KWR vs. The Competition

MetricQuaker HoughtonCHEM IndustryMaterials SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$2.47B$15.08B$4.91B$23.11B
Dividend Yield1.43%1.95%4.95%4.09%
P/E Ratio507.8834.8123.3831.03
Price / Sales1.312.486,526.1414.71
Price / Cash11.1014.5627.3524.78
Price / Book1.794.699.464.68
Net Income-$2.49M$376.44M$156.62M$1.07B
7 Day Performance-3.54%-1.89%0.25%-0.50%
1 Month Performance0.45%-1.91%0.97%0.39%
1 Year Performance32.06%19.71%70.13%25.64%

Quaker Houghton Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
KWR
Quaker Houghton
3.8362 of 5 stars
$142.20
-1.4%
$166.00
+16.7%
+38.3%$2.47B$1.89B507.884,700
IOSP
Innospec
4.3526 of 5 stars
$82.49
-0.5%
N/A-4.1%$2.04B$1.78B18.022,450
NDSN
Nordson
3.7156 of 5 stars
$286.43
-0.3%
$311.29
+8.7%
+35.6%$15.67B$2.90B30.038,000
AVNT
Avient
4.5646 of 5 stars
$35.20
-0.6%
$46.40
+31.8%
-1.8%$3.17B$3.28B20.149,000
BC
Brunswick
3.3522 of 5 stars
$83.21
-0.7%
$87.00
+4.6%
+65.1%$5.44B$5.36BN/A14,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:KWR) was last updated on 6/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners