Which has stronger earnings & valuation, LNN or AGCO?

AGCO has higher revenue and earnings than Lindsay. AGCO is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lindsay, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Lindsay $676.37M 1.80 $74.05M $5.46 21.41 AGCO $10.08B 0.80 $726.50M $10.37 10.74

Is LNN or AGCO more profitable?

Lindsay has a net margin of 9.25% compared to AGCO's net margin of 7.43%. Lindsay's return on equity of 11.28% beat AGCO's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Lindsay 9.25% 11.28% 7.04% AGCO 7.43% 9.99% 3.53%

Does the media refer more to LNN or AGCO?

In the previous week, AGCO had 1 more articles in the media than Lindsay. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for AGCO and 4 mentions for Lindsay. AGCO's average media sentiment score of 1.37 beat Lindsay's score of -0.07 indicating that AGCO is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Lindsay 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral AGCO 4 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, LNN or GEF?

Greif has higher revenue and earnings than Lindsay. Lindsay is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Greif, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Lindsay $676.37M 1.80 $74.05M $5.46 21.41 Greif $5.45B 0.59 $268.80M $2.61 26.89

Is LNN or GEF more profitable?

Lindsay has a net margin of 9.25% compared to Greif's net margin of 7.27%. Lindsay's return on equity of 11.28% beat Greif's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Lindsay 9.25% 11.28% 7.04% Greif 7.27% 7.50% 3.16%

Does the media prefer LNN or GEF?

In the previous week, Lindsay and Lindsay both had 4 articles in the media. Greif's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Lindsay's score of -0.07 indicating that Greif is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Lindsay 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Greif 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, LNN or PNR?

Pentair has higher revenue and earnings than Lindsay. Pentair is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lindsay, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Lindsay $676.37M 1.80 $74.05M $5.46 21.41 Pentair $4.18B 2.83 $653.80M $4.08 17.95

Is LNN or PNR more profitable?

Pentair has a net margin of 15.98% compared to Lindsay's net margin of 9.25%. Pentair's return on equity of 21.92% beat Lindsay's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Lindsay 9.25% 11.28% 7.04% Pentair 15.98% 21.92% 12.21%

Does the media refer more to LNN or PNR?

In the previous week, Lindsay had 3 more articles in the media than Pentair. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Lindsay and 1 mentions for Pentair. Pentair's average media sentiment score of 1.25 beat Lindsay's score of -0.07 indicating that Pentair is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Lindsay 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Pentair 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, TRN or LNN?

Trinity Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Lindsay. Trinity Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lindsay, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Trinity Industries $2.16B 1.29 $253.10M $3.12 11.25 Lindsay $676.37M 1.80 $74.05M $5.46 21.41

Does the media prefer TRN or LNN?

In the previous week, Lindsay had 3 more articles in the media than Trinity Industries. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Lindsay and 1 mentions for Trinity Industries. Trinity Industries' average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Lindsay's score of -0.07 indicating that Trinity Industries is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Trinity Industries 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Lindsay 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has higher earnings and valuation, LNN or ALG?

Alamo Group has higher revenue and earnings than Lindsay. Alamo Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lindsay, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Lindsay $676.37M 1.80 $74.05M $5.46 21.41 Alamo Group $1.60B 1.21 $103.80M $8.36 19.03

Is LNN or ALG more profitable?

Lindsay has a net margin of 9.25% compared to Alamo Group's net margin of 6.21%. Lindsay's return on equity of 11.28% beat Alamo Group's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Lindsay 9.25% 11.28% 7.04% Alamo Group 6.21% 9.71% 6.84%

Does the media refer more to LNN or ALG?

In the previous week, Alamo Group had 8 more articles in the media than Lindsay. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Alamo Group and 4 mentions for Lindsay. Alamo Group's average media sentiment score of 0.42 beat Lindsay's score of -0.07 indicating that Alamo Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Lindsay 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Alamo Group 2 Very Positive mention(s) 4 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Lindsay (LNN) Competitors

$116.91 +0.18 (+0.15%)

Closing price 06/23/2026 03:57 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$117.42 +0.51 (+0.44%)

As of 04:10 AM Eastern

Compare

LNN vs. AGCO, GEF, PNR, TRN, and ALG

Should you buy Lindsay stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Lindsay with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Lindsay include AGCO (AGCO), Greif (GEF), Pentair (PNR), Trinity Industries (TRN), and Alamo Group (ALG).

How does Lindsay compare to AGCO?

Lindsay (NYSE:LNN) and AGCO (NYSE:AGCO) are both industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, valuation, institutional ownership and dividends.

Lindsay currently has a consensus price target of $113.00, suggesting a potential downside of 3.34%. AGCO has a consensus price target of $126.50, suggesting a potential upside of 13.56%. Given AGCO's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe AGCO is more favorable than Lindsay.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Lindsay	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
AGCO	2 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.09

Lindsay has a beta of 0.72, suggesting that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, AGCO has a beta of 1.08, suggesting that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

AGCO has higher revenue and earnings than Lindsay. AGCO is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lindsay, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Lindsay	$676.37M	1.80	$74.05M	$5.46	21.41
AGCO	$10.08B	0.80	$726.50M	$10.37	10.74

89.9% of Lindsay shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 78.8% of AGCO shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.8% of Lindsay shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of AGCO shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, AGCO had 1 more articles in the media than Lindsay. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for AGCO and 4 mentions for Lindsay. AGCO's average media sentiment score of 1.37 beat Lindsay's score of -0.07 indicating that AGCO is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Lindsay	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
AGCO	4 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Lindsay pays an annual dividend of $1.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. AGCO pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Lindsay pays out 27.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. AGCO pays out 11.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Lindsay has raised its dividend for 22 consecutive years and AGCO has raised its dividend for 12 consecutive years. Lindsay is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Lindsay has a net margin of 9.25% compared to AGCO's net margin of 7.43%. Lindsay's return on equity of 11.28% beat AGCO's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Lindsay	9.25%	11.28%	7.04%
AGCO	7.43%	9.99%	3.53%

Summary

AGCO beats Lindsay on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lindsay compare to Greif?

Lindsay (NYSE:LNN) and Greif (NYSE:GEF) are both industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, risk and dividends.

89.9% of Lindsay shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 45.7% of Greif shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of Lindsay shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 7.7% of Greif shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Lindsay and Lindsay both had 4 articles in the media. Greif's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Lindsay's score of -0.07 indicating that Greif is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Lindsay	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Greif	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Lindsay pays an annual dividend of $1.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Greif pays an annual dividend of $2.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Lindsay pays out 27.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Greif pays out 95.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Lindsay has increased its dividend for 22 consecutive years and Greif has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

Lindsay has a net margin of 9.25% compared to Greif's net margin of 7.27%. Lindsay's return on equity of 11.28% beat Greif's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Lindsay	9.25%	11.28%	7.04%
Greif	7.27%	7.50%	3.16%

Greif has higher revenue and earnings than Lindsay. Lindsay is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Greif, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Lindsay	$676.37M	1.80	$74.05M	$5.46	21.41
Greif	$5.45B	0.59	$268.80M	$2.61	26.89

Lindsay has a beta of 0.72, indicating that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Greif has a beta of 0.8, indicating that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the broader market.

Lindsay presently has a consensus price target of $113.00, suggesting a potential downside of 3.34%. Greif has a consensus price target of $73.50, suggesting a potential upside of 4.72%. Given Greif's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Greif is more favorable than Lindsay.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Lindsay	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Greif	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Summary

Lindsay and Greif tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lindsay compare to Pentair?

Lindsay (NYSE:LNN) and Pentair (NYSE:PNR) are related companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, earnings, valuation and media sentiment.

Lindsay currently has a consensus target price of $113.00, indicating a potential downside of 3.34%. Pentair has a consensus target price of $107.86, indicating a potential upside of 47.25%. Given Pentair's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Pentair is more favorable than Lindsay.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Lindsay	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Pentair	3 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.47

Lindsay has a beta of 0.72, indicating that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pentair has a beta of 1.05, indicating that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the broader market.

Lindsay pays an annual dividend of $1.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Pentair pays an annual dividend of $1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Lindsay pays out 27.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pentair pays out 26.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Lindsay has raised its dividend for 22 consecutive years and Pentair has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years. Pentair is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Lindsay had 3 more articles in the media than Pentair. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Lindsay and 1 mentions for Pentair. Pentair's average media sentiment score of 1.25 beat Lindsay's score of -0.07 indicating that Pentair is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Lindsay	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Pentair	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

89.9% of Lindsay shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.4% of Pentair shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of Lindsay shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Pentair shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Pentair has higher revenue and earnings than Lindsay. Pentair is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lindsay, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Lindsay	$676.37M	1.80	$74.05M	$5.46	21.41
Pentair	$4.18B	2.83	$653.80M	$4.08	17.95

Pentair has a net margin of 15.98% compared to Lindsay's net margin of 9.25%. Pentair's return on equity of 21.92% beat Lindsay's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Lindsay	9.25%	11.28%	7.04%
Pentair	15.98%	21.92%	12.21%

Summary

Pentair beats Lindsay on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lindsay compare to Trinity Industries?

Trinity Industries (NYSE:TRN) and Lindsay (NYSE:LNN) are both construction & farm machinery & heavy trucks companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings and risk.

Trinity Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Lindsay. Trinity Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lindsay, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Trinity Industries	$2.16B	1.29	$253.10M	$3.12	11.25
Lindsay	$676.37M	1.80	$74.05M	$5.46	21.41

86.6% of Trinity Industries shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.9% of Lindsay shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of Trinity Industries shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Lindsay shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Trinity Industries currently has a consensus target price of $35.50, indicating a potential upside of 1.17%. Lindsay has a consensus target price of $113.00, indicating a potential downside of 3.34%. Given Trinity Industries' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Trinity Industries is more favorable than Lindsay.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Trinity Industries	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
Lindsay	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Trinity Industries pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Lindsay pays an annual dividend of $1.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Trinity Industries pays out 39.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Lindsay pays out 27.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Trinity Industries has raised its dividend for 16 consecutive years and Lindsay has raised its dividend for 22 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Lindsay had 3 more articles in the media than Trinity Industries. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Lindsay and 1 mentions for Trinity Industries. Trinity Industries' average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Lindsay's score of -0.07 indicating that Trinity Industries is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Trinity Industries	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Lindsay	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Trinity Industries has a net margin of 12.37% compared to Lindsay's net margin of 9.25%. Trinity Industries' return on equity of 21.86% beat Lindsay's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Trinity Industries	12.37%	21.86%	3.04%
Lindsay	9.25%	11.28%	7.04%

Trinity Industries has a beta of 1.37, suggesting that its share price is 37% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lindsay has a beta of 0.72, suggesting that its share price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Trinity Industries beats Lindsay on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lindsay compare to Alamo Group?

Lindsay (NYSE:LNN) and Alamo Group (NYSE:ALG) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Lindsay pays an annual dividend of $1.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Alamo Group pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Lindsay pays out 27.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Alamo Group pays out 16.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Lindsay has raised its dividend for 22 consecutive years and Alamo Group has raised its dividend for 14 consecutive years. Lindsay is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Alamo Group has higher revenue and earnings than Lindsay. Alamo Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lindsay, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Lindsay	$676.37M	1.80	$74.05M	$5.46	21.41
Alamo Group	$1.60B	1.21	$103.80M	$8.36	19.03

89.9% of Lindsay shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.4% of Alamo Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of Lindsay shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Alamo Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Lindsay presently has a consensus price target of $113.00, suggesting a potential downside of 3.34%. Alamo Group has a consensus price target of $224.00, suggesting a potential upside of 40.81%. Given Alamo Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Alamo Group is more favorable than Lindsay.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Lindsay	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Alamo Group	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

In the previous week, Alamo Group had 8 more articles in the media than Lindsay. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Alamo Group and 4 mentions for Lindsay. Alamo Group's average media sentiment score of 0.42 beat Lindsay's score of -0.07 indicating that Alamo Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Lindsay	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Alamo Group	2 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Lindsay has a beta of 0.72, meaning that its share price is 28% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alamo Group has a beta of 1.11, meaning that its share price is 11% more volatile than the broader market.

Lindsay has a net margin of 9.25% compared to Alamo Group's net margin of 6.21%. Lindsay's return on equity of 11.28% beat Alamo Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Lindsay	9.25%	11.28%	7.04%
Alamo Group	6.21%	9.71%	6.84%

Summary

Alamo Group beats Lindsay on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Lindsay News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding LNN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

LNN vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Lindsay	MACH Industry	Industrials Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$1.21B	$22.95B	$9.70B	$23.25B
Dividend Yield	1.27%	1.08%	3.55%	4.06%
P/E Ratio	21.41	15.63	25.73	31.08
Price / Sales	1.80	1.11	4,964.76	105.78
Price / Cash	13.35	13.22	27.93	24.45
Price / Book	2.38	2.04	4.61	4.64
Net Income	$74.05M	$760.43M	$793.53M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	0.41%	-3.41%	-0.30%	0.13%
1 Month Performance	6.92%	-0.85%	0.08%	0.15%
1 Year Performance	-15.25%	-2.38%	24.06%	23.17%

Lindsay Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
LNN Lindsay	3.109 of 5 stars	$116.91 +0.2%	$113.00 -3.3%	-14.6%	$1.21B	$676.37M	21.41	1,275
AGCO AGCO	4.9596 of 5 stars	$113.78 +1.6%	$126.50 +11.2%	+10.6%	$8.11B	$10.08B	10.97	22,000	Positive News
GEF Greif	4.2827 of 5 stars	$68.92 -1.4%	$73.50 +6.6%	+7.7%	$3.22B	$5.45B	26.41	14,000	High Trading Volume
PNR Pentair	4.8885 of 5 stars	$74.47 +1.5%	$107.86 +44.8%	-26.5%	$11.86B	$4.18B	18.25	9,000	Positive News
TRN Trinity Industries	2.4534 of 5 stars	$34.57 +0.8%	$35.50 +2.7%	+34.2%	$2.73B	$2.16B	11.08	2,650

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:LNN) was last updated on 6/24/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Lindsay (LNN) Competitors