Sensient Technologies (SXT) Competitors

Sensient Technologies logo
$113.21 +2.16 (+1.95%)
Closing price 06/18/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$116.72 +3.51 (+3.10%)
As of 06/18/2026 06:51 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

SXT vs. ALB, IFF, RPM, NEU, and CE

Should you buy Sensient Technologies stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Sensient Technologies with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Sensient Technologies include Albemarle (ALB), International Flavors & Fragrances (IFF), RPM International (RPM), NewMarket (NEU), and Celanese (CE). These companies are all part of the "specialty chemicals" industry.

How does Sensient Technologies compare to Albemarle?

Sensient Technologies (NYSE:SXT) and Albemarle (NYSE:ALB) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

Sensient Technologies has a net margin of 8.71% compared to Albemarle's net margin of -5.00%. Sensient Technologies' return on equity of 13.12% beat Albemarle's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sensient Technologies8.71% 13.12% 6.97%
Albemarle -5.00%5.22%2.51%

Sensient Technologies pays an annual dividend of $1.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Albemarle pays an annual dividend of $1.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Sensient Technologies pays out 48.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Albemarle pays out -47.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Albemarle has increased its dividend for 30 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Albemarle had 4 more articles in the media than Sensient Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Albemarle and 5 mentions for Sensient Technologies. Sensient Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.37 beat Albemarle's score of 0.79 indicating that Sensient Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Sensient Technologies
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Albemarle
6 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Sensient Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Albemarle. Albemarle is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sensient Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sensient Technologies$1.61B2.99$134.49M$3.3933.40
Albemarle$5.14B3.67-$510.63M-$3.41N/A

Sensient Technologies has a beta of 0.8, indicating that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Albemarle has a beta of 1.3, indicating that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market.

90.9% of Sensient Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.9% of Albemarle shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of Sensient Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Albemarle shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Sensient Technologies presently has a consensus price target of $134.00, indicating a potential upside of 18.36%. Albemarle has a consensus price target of $202.54, indicating a potential upside of 26.49%. Given Albemarle's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Albemarle is more favorable than Sensient Technologies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Sensient Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Albemarle
1 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
15 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.59

Summary

Sensient Technologies beats Albemarle on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sensient Technologies compare to International Flavors & Fragrances?

International Flavors & Fragrances (NYSE:IFF) and Sensient Technologies (NYSE:SXT) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings and risk.

International Flavors & Fragrances pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Sensient Technologies pays an annual dividend of $1.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. International Flavors & Fragrances pays out 48.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Sensient Technologies pays out 48.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

International Flavors & Fragrances currently has a consensus price target of $91.05, suggesting a potential upside of 18.40%. Sensient Technologies has a consensus price target of $134.00, suggesting a potential upside of 18.36%. Given International Flavors & Fragrances' higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe International Flavors & Fragrances is more favorable than Sensient Technologies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
International Flavors & Fragrances
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
13 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.72
Sensient Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Sensient Technologies has a net margin of 8.71% compared to International Flavors & Fragrances' net margin of 7.78%. Sensient Technologies' return on equity of 13.12% beat International Flavors & Fragrances' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
International Flavors & Fragrances7.78% 7.65% 4.25%
Sensient Technologies 8.71%13.12%6.97%

In the previous week, International Flavors & Fragrances had 2 more articles in the media than Sensient Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for International Flavors & Fragrances and 5 mentions for Sensient Technologies. Sensient Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.37 beat International Flavors & Fragrances' score of 1.11 indicating that Sensient Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
International Flavors & Fragrances
5 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Sensient Technologies
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

International Flavors & Fragrances has a beta of 0.94, suggesting that its share price is 6% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sensient Technologies has a beta of 0.8, suggesting that its share price is 20% less volatile than the broader market.

Sensient Technologies has lower revenue, but higher earnings than International Flavors & Fragrances. International Flavors & Fragrances is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sensient Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
International Flavors & Fragrances$10.89B1.80-$361M$3.2723.52
Sensient Technologies$1.61B2.99$134.49M$3.3933.40

96.0% of International Flavors & Fragrances shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.9% of Sensient Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of International Flavors & Fragrances shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Sensient Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Sensient Technologies beats International Flavors & Fragrances on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sensient Technologies compare to RPM International?

RPM International (NYSE:RPM) and Sensient Technologies (NYSE:SXT) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and earnings.

RPM International has a beta of 1.04, indicating that its stock price is 4% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sensient Technologies has a beta of 0.8, indicating that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the broader market.

RPM International pays an annual dividend of $2.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Sensient Technologies pays an annual dividend of $1.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. RPM International pays out 41.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Sensient Technologies pays out 48.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. RPM International has increased its dividend for 51 consecutive years. RPM International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Sensient Technologies had 3 more articles in the media than RPM International. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Sensient Technologies and 2 mentions for RPM International. Sensient Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.37 beat RPM International's score of 0.44 indicating that Sensient Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
RPM International
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Sensient Technologies
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Sensient Technologies has a net margin of 8.71% compared to RPM International's net margin of 8.63%. RPM International's return on equity of 22.55% beat Sensient Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
RPM International8.63% 22.55% 8.75%
Sensient Technologies 8.71%13.12%6.97%

RPM International has higher revenue and earnings than Sensient Technologies. RPM International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sensient Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
RPM International$7.37B1.87$688.69M$5.1920.84
Sensient Technologies$1.61B2.99$134.49M$3.3933.40

RPM International presently has a consensus target price of $127.42, suggesting a potential upside of 17.79%. Sensient Technologies has a consensus target price of $134.00, suggesting a potential upside of 18.36%. Given Sensient Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Sensient Technologies is more favorable than RPM International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
RPM International
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.73
Sensient Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

81.0% of RPM International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.9% of Sensient Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.6% of RPM International shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Sensient Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

RPM International beats Sensient Technologies on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sensient Technologies compare to NewMarket?

Sensient Technologies (NYSE:SXT) and NewMarket (NYSE:NEU) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation and risk.

In the previous week, Sensient Technologies had 4 more articles in the media than NewMarket. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Sensient Technologies and 1 mentions for NewMarket. Sensient Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.37 beat NewMarket's score of 0.00 indicating that Sensient Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Sensient Technologies
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
NewMarket
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Sensient Technologies has a beta of 0.8, meaning that its share price is 20% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, NewMarket has a beta of 0.56, meaning that its share price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

Sensient Technologies pays an annual dividend of $1.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. NewMarket pays an annual dividend of $12.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Sensient Technologies pays out 48.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. NewMarket pays out 27.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. NewMarket has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years. NewMarket is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

NewMarket has higher revenue and earnings than Sensient Technologies. NewMarket is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sensient Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sensient Technologies$1.61B2.99$134.49M$3.3933.40
NewMarket$2.73B2.62$418.75M$43.7817.75

NewMarket has a net margin of 15.25% compared to Sensient Technologies' net margin of 8.71%. NewMarket's return on equity of 24.12% beat Sensient Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sensient Technologies8.71% 13.12% 6.97%
NewMarket 15.25%24.12%12.24%

Sensient Technologies presently has a consensus price target of $134.00, indicating a potential upside of 18.36%. Given Sensient Technologies' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Sensient Technologies is more favorable than NewMarket.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Sensient Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
NewMarket
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

90.9% of Sensient Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.1% of NewMarket shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of Sensient Technologies shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 8.6% of NewMarket shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

NewMarket beats Sensient Technologies on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sensient Technologies compare to Celanese?

Celanese (NYSE:CE) and Sensient Technologies (NYSE:SXT) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, valuation and profitability.

Celanese pays an annual dividend of $0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Sensient Technologies pays an annual dividend of $1.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Celanese pays out -1.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Sensient Technologies pays out 48.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Celanese has a beta of 0.73, indicating that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sensient Technologies has a beta of 0.8, indicating that its share price is 20% less volatile than the broader market.

Sensient Technologies has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Celanese. Celanese is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sensient Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Celanese$9.54B0.59-$1.17B-$10.01N/A
Sensient Technologies$1.61B2.99$134.49M$3.3933.40

In the previous week, Celanese had 2 more articles in the media than Sensient Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Celanese and 5 mentions for Sensient Technologies. Sensient Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.37 beat Celanese's score of 0.33 indicating that Sensient Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Celanese
0 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Sensient Technologies
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Celanese presently has a consensus target price of $67.81, suggesting a potential upside of 32.61%. Sensient Technologies has a consensus target price of $134.00, suggesting a potential upside of 18.36%. Given Celanese's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Celanese is more favorable than Sensient Technologies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Celanese
1 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Sensient Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Sensient Technologies has a net margin of 8.71% compared to Celanese's net margin of -11.54%. Sensient Technologies' return on equity of 13.12% beat Celanese's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Celanese-11.54% 9.92% 2.12%
Sensient Technologies 8.71%13.12%6.97%

98.9% of Celanese shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.9% of Sensient Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Celanese shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Sensient Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Sensient Technologies beats Celanese on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Sensient Technologies News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SXT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SXT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SXT vs. The Competition

MetricSensient TechnologiesCHEM IndustryMaterials SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$4.73B$15.56B$4.86B$23.14B
Dividend Yield1.48%1.93%4.99%4.07%
P/E Ratio33.4036.0223.5131.62
Price / Sales2.992.566,071.8822.79
Price / Cash22.5314.7127.0424.08
Price / Book4.034.989.244.68
Net Income$134.49M$376.36M$156.93M$1.08B
7 Day Performance-8.92%-0.88%0.65%-0.82%
1 Month Performance-0.47%5.15%-0.96%3.11%
1 Year Performance17.44%19.86%57.15%24.65%

Sensient Technologies Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SXT
Sensient Technologies
4.6219 of 5 stars
$113.21
+1.9%
$134.00
+18.4%
+17.4%$4.73B$1.61B33.404,070
ALB
Albemarle
4.5025 of 5 stars
$168.87
-0.9%
$203.04
+20.2%
+169.5%$20.10B$5.14BN/A7,800
IFF
International Flavors & Fragrances
4.7719 of 5 stars
$78.32
+0.1%
$91.05
+16.3%
+2.8%$19.98B$10.89B23.9521,500
RPM
RPM International
4.6845 of 5 stars
$108.82
+1.7%
$127.42
+17.1%
+1.2%$13.66B$7.37B20.9717,778
NEU
NewMarket
1.3872 of 5 stars
$815.98
-2.1%
N/A+19.8%$7.66B$2.73B18.642,050

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:SXT) was last updated on 6/19/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners