Does the media refer more to SQM or SXT?

In the previous week, Sociedad Quimica y Minera had 3 more articles in the media than Sensient Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Sociedad Quimica y Minera and 4 mentions for Sensient Technologies. Sensient Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.64 beat Sociedad Quimica y Minera's score of 0.59 indicating that Sensient Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Sociedad Quimica y Minera 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Sensient Technologies 1 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to DD or SXT?

In the previous week, DuPont de Nemours and DuPont de Nemours both had 4 articles in the media. Sensient Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.64 beat DuPont de Nemours' score of 0.22 indicating that Sensient Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment DuPont de Nemours 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Sensient Technologies 1 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer SXT or ALB?

In the previous week, Albemarle had 12 more articles in the media than Sensient Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Albemarle and 4 mentions for Sensient Technologies. Albemarle's average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat Sensient Technologies' score of 0.64 indicating that Albemarle is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Sensient Technologies 1 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Albemarle 11 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor RPM or SXT?

In the previous week, RPM International had 11 more articles in the media than Sensient Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for RPM International and 4 mentions for Sensient Technologies. Sensient Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.64 beat RPM International's score of 0.22 indicating that Sensient Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment RPM International 3 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Sensient Technologies 1 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Sensient Technologies (SXT) Competitors

$132.85 +2.71 (+2.08%)

Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$133.14 +0.28 (+0.21%)

As of 04:20 PM Eastern

Compare

SXT vs. SQM, IFF, DD, ALB, and RPM

Should you buy Sensient Technologies stock or one of its competitors? Sensient Technologies's main competitors and comparable companies include Sociedad Quimica y Minera (SQM), International Flavors & Fragrances (IFF), DuPont de Nemours (DD), Albemarle (ALB), and RPM International (RPM). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "specialty chemicals" industry.

How does Sensient Technologies compare to Sociedad Quimica y Minera?

Sociedad Quimica y Minera (NYSE:SQM) and Sensient Technologies (NYSE:SXT) are both materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, risk, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Sociedad Quimica y Minera presently has a consensus price target of $73.58, suggesting a potential downside of 2.44%. Sensient Technologies has a consensus price target of $140.00, suggesting a potential upside of 5.38%. Given Sensient Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Sensient Technologies is more favorable than Sociedad Quimica y Minera.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Sociedad Quimica y Minera	1 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40
Sensient Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Sociedad Quimica y Minera has a net margin of 15.38% compared to Sensient Technologies' net margin of 9.27%. Sensient Technologies' return on equity of 13.77% beat Sociedad Quimica y Minera's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Sociedad Quimica y Minera	15.38%	11.99%	6.09%
Sensient Technologies	9.27%	13.77%	7.33%

12.4% of Sociedad Quimica y Minera shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.9% of Sensient Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of Sensient Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Sociedad Quimica y Minera pays an annual dividend of $2.65 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Sensient Technologies pays an annual dividend of $1.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Sociedad Quimica y Minera pays out 93.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Sensient Technologies pays out 44.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Sociedad Quimica y Minera has higher revenue and earnings than Sensient Technologies. Sociedad Quimica y Minera is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sensient Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Sociedad Quimica y Minera	$4.58B	4.71	$588.14M	$2.85	26.47
Sensient Technologies	$1.61B	3.51	$134.49M	$3.71	35.81

In the previous week, Sociedad Quimica y Minera had 3 more articles in the media than Sensient Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Sociedad Quimica y Minera and 4 mentions for Sensient Technologies. Sensient Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.64 beat Sociedad Quimica y Minera's score of 0.59 indicating that Sensient Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Sociedad Quimica y Minera	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Sensient Technologies	1 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Sociedad Quimica y Minera has a beta of 0.98, suggesting that its share price is 2% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sensient Technologies has a beta of 0.78, suggesting that its share price is 22% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Sensient Technologies beats Sociedad Quimica y Minera on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sensient Technologies compare to International Flavors & Fragrances?

Sensient Technologies (NYSE:SXT) and International Flavors & Fragrances (NYSE:IFF) are both materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings and profitability.

Sensient Technologies currently has a consensus price target of $140.00, suggesting a potential upside of 5.38%. International Flavors & Fragrances has a consensus price target of $92.16, suggesting a potential upside of 10.72%. Given International Flavors & Fragrances' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe International Flavors & Fragrances is more favorable than Sensient Technologies.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Sensient Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
International Flavors & Fragrances	1 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.60

90.9% of Sensient Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.0% of International Flavors & Fragrances shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of Sensient Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of International Flavors & Fragrances shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Sensient Technologies has a net margin of 9.27% compared to International Flavors & Fragrances' net margin of 2.78%. Sensient Technologies' return on equity of 13.77% beat International Flavors & Fragrances' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Sensient Technologies	9.27%	13.77%	7.33%
International Flavors & Fragrances	2.78%	7.11%	3.96%

Sensient Technologies has a beta of 0.78, meaning that its share price is 22% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, International Flavors & Fragrances has a beta of 0.93, meaning that its share price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

Sensient Technologies pays an annual dividend of $1.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. International Flavors & Fragrances pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Sensient Technologies pays out 44.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. International Flavors & Fragrances pays out 146.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Sensient Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than International Flavors & Fragrances. Sensient Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than International Flavors & Fragrances, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Sensient Technologies	$1.61B	3.51	$134.49M	$3.71	35.81
International Flavors & Fragrances	$10.89B	1.95	-$361M	$1.09	76.36

In the previous week, International Flavors & Fragrances had 5 more articles in the media than Sensient Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for International Flavors & Fragrances and 4 mentions for Sensient Technologies. Sensient Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.64 beat International Flavors & Fragrances' score of 0.42 indicating that Sensient Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Sensient Technologies	1 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
International Flavors & Fragrances	3 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Sensient Technologies beats International Flavors & Fragrances on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sensient Technologies compare to DuPont de Nemours?

DuPont de Nemours (NYSE:DD) and Sensient Technologies (NYSE:SXT) are both materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, risk and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, DuPont de Nemours and DuPont de Nemours both had 4 articles in the media. Sensient Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.64 beat DuPont de Nemours' score of 0.22 indicating that Sensient Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
DuPont de Nemours	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Sensient Technologies	1 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

DuPont de Nemours has a beta of 1.06, meaning that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sensient Technologies has a beta of 0.78, meaning that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the broader market.

74.0% of DuPont de Nemours shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.9% of Sensient Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of DuPont de Nemours shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Sensient Technologies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Sensient Technologies has lower revenue, but higher earnings than DuPont de Nemours. Sensient Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than DuPont de Nemours, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
DuPont de Nemours	$6.85B	2.75	-$779M	$0.45	310.33
Sensient Technologies	$1.61B	3.51	$134.49M	$3.71	35.81

Sensient Technologies has a net margin of 9.27% compared to DuPont de Nemours' net margin of 0.67%. Sensient Technologies' return on equity of 13.77% beat DuPont de Nemours' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
DuPont de Nemours	0.67%	6.92%	4.44%
Sensient Technologies	9.27%	13.77%	7.33%

DuPont de Nemours presently has a consensus price target of $166.60, suggesting a potential upside of 19.30%. Sensient Technologies has a consensus price target of $140.00, suggesting a potential upside of 5.38%. Given DuPont de Nemours' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe DuPont de Nemours is more favorable than Sensient Technologies.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
DuPont de Nemours	1 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.65
Sensient Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

DuPont de Nemours pays an annual dividend of $2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Sensient Technologies pays an annual dividend of $1.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. DuPont de Nemours pays out 533.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Sensient Technologies pays out 44.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Summary

Sensient Technologies beats DuPont de Nemours on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sensient Technologies compare to Albemarle?

Sensient Technologies (NYSE:SXT) and Albemarle (NYSE:ALB) are both materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, profitability and risk.

Sensient Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Albemarle. Sensient Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Albemarle, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Sensient Technologies	$1.61B	3.51	$134.49M	$3.71	35.81
Albemarle	$5.14B	3.08	-$510.63M	$0.27	497.91

Sensient Technologies has a net margin of 9.27% compared to Albemarle's net margin of 3.09%. Sensient Technologies' return on equity of 13.77% beat Albemarle's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Sensient Technologies	9.27%	13.77%	7.33%
Albemarle	3.09%	10.96%	5.39%

In the previous week, Albemarle had 12 more articles in the media than Sensient Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Albemarle and 4 mentions for Sensient Technologies. Albemarle's average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat Sensient Technologies' score of 0.64 indicating that Albemarle is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Sensient Technologies	1 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Albemarle	11 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Sensient Technologies currently has a consensus price target of $140.00, indicating a potential upside of 5.38%. Albemarle has a consensus price target of $190.26, indicating a potential upside of 41.53%. Given Albemarle's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Albemarle is more favorable than Sensient Technologies.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Sensient Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Albemarle	2 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	15 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

90.9% of Sensient Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.9% of Albemarle shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of Sensient Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Albemarle shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Sensient Technologies has a beta of 0.78, suggesting that its share price is 22% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Albemarle has a beta of 1.33, suggesting that its share price is 33% more volatile than the broader market.

Sensient Technologies pays an annual dividend of $1.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Albemarle pays an annual dividend of $1.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Sensient Technologies pays out 44.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Albemarle pays out 600.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Albemarle has increased its dividend for 30 consecutive years. Sensient Technologies is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Sensient Technologies beats Albemarle on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Sensient Technologies compare to RPM International?

RPM International (NYSE:RPM) and Sensient Technologies (NYSE:SXT) are both materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

RPM International presently has a consensus target price of $126.00, indicating a potential upside of 12.97%. Sensient Technologies has a consensus target price of $140.00, indicating a potential upside of 5.38%. Given RPM International's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe RPM International is more favorable than Sensient Technologies.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
RPM International	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.71
Sensient Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

81.0% of RPM International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.9% of Sensient Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 1.6% of RPM International shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Sensient Technologies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

RPM International has higher revenue and earnings than Sensient Technologies. RPM International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sensient Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
RPM International	$7.86B	1.81	$661.39M	$5.16	21.61
Sensient Technologies	$1.61B	3.51	$134.49M	$3.71	35.81

RPM International has a beta of 1.04, meaning that its share price is 4% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sensient Technologies has a beta of 0.78, meaning that its share price is 22% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, RPM International had 11 more articles in the media than Sensient Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for RPM International and 4 mentions for Sensient Technologies. Sensient Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.64 beat RPM International's score of 0.22 indicating that Sensient Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
RPM International	3 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Sensient Technologies	1 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

RPM International pays an annual dividend of $2.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Sensient Technologies pays an annual dividend of $1.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. RPM International pays out 41.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Sensient Technologies pays out 44.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. RPM International has raised its dividend for 51 consecutive years. RPM International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Sensient Technologies has a net margin of 9.27% compared to RPM International's net margin of 8.41%. RPM International's return on equity of 22.45% beat Sensient Technologies' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
RPM International	8.41%	22.45%	8.86%
Sensient Technologies	9.27%	13.77%	7.33%

Summary

RPM International beats Sensient Technologies on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Sensient Technologies News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SXT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

SXT vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Sensient Technologies	Chemicals Industry	Materials Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$5.65B	$11.39B	$4.96B	$24.21B
Dividend Yield	1.23%	2.85%	4.71%	3.69%
P/E Ratio	35.81	40.24	26.57	30.05
Price / Sales	3.51	52.22	4,617.05	17.63
Price / Cash	27.08	15.51	24.65	20.16
Price / Book	4.73	3.53	8.91	4.95
Net Income	$134.49M	$222.46M	$155.10M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	1.79%	0.18%	1.05%	-0.03%
1 Month Performance	22.17%	2.58%	9.88%	2.59%
1 Year Performance	16.68%	19.70%	46.91%	18.10%

Sensient Technologies Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
SXT Sensient Technologies	3.9858 of 5 stars	$132.85 +2.1%	$140.00 +5.4%	+12.0%	$5.65B	$1.61B	35.81	4,070	Gap Up
SQM Sociedad Quimica y Minera	3.4036 of 5 stars	$73.70 -1.9%	$73.58 -0.2%	+61.0%	$21.05B	$5.30B	25.86	7,739	News Coverage Earnings Report
IFF International Flavors & Fragrances	3.8166 of 5 stars	$81.93 +0.1%	$92.16 +12.5%	+24.0%	$20.90B	$10.78B	75.16	21,500	Analyst Downgrade Insider Trade
DD DuPont de Nemours	3.8138 of 5 stars	$139.66 -2.4%	$166.60 +19.3%	+51.3%	$18.86B	$6.99B	310.41	15,000
ALB Albemarle	3.3966 of 5 stars	$130.81 -2.4%	$190.26 +45.5%	+59.5%	$15.44B	$5.91B	484.48	7,800

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:SXT) was last updated on 8/19/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Sensient Technologies (SXT) Competitors

SXT vs. SQM, IFF, DD, ALB, and RPM

How does Sensient Technologies compare to Sociedad Quimica y Minera?

Summary

How does Sensient Technologies compare to International Flavors & Fragrances?

Summary

How does Sensient Technologies compare to DuPont de Nemours?

Summary

How does Sensient Technologies compare to Albemarle?

Summary

How does Sensient Technologies compare to RPM International?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

SXT vs. The Competition

Sensient Technologies Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Sensient Technologies (SXT) Competitors

SXT vs. SQM, IFF, DD, ALB, and RPM

How does Sensient Technologies compare to Sociedad Quimica y Minera?

Do analysts recommend SQM or SXT?

Is SQM or SXT more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of SQM or SXT?

Is SQM or SXT a better dividend stock?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, SQM or SXT?

Does the media refer more to SQM or SXT?

Which has more risk and volatility, SQM or SXT?

Summary

How does Sensient Technologies compare to International Flavors & Fragrances?

Do analysts prefer SXT or IFF?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of SXT or IFF?

Is SXT or IFF more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, SXT or IFF?

Is SXT or IFF a better dividend stock?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, SXT or IFF?

Does the media favor SXT or IFF?

Summary

How does Sensient Technologies compare to DuPont de Nemours?

Does the media refer more to DD or SXT?

Which has more risk & volatility, DD or SXT?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in DD or SXT?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, DD or SXT?

Is DD or SXT more profitable?

Do analysts prefer DD or SXT?

Is DD or SXT a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Sensient Technologies compare to Albemarle?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, SXT or ALB?

Is SXT or ALB more profitable?

Does the media prefer SXT or ALB?

Do analysts prefer SXT or ALB?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in SXT or ALB?

Which has more volatility & risk, SXT or ALB?

Is SXT or ALB a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Sensient Technologies compare to RPM International?

Do analysts prefer RPM or SXT?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in RPM or SXT?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, RPM or SXT?

Which has more volatility & risk, RPM or SXT?

Does the media favor RPM or SXT?

Is RPM or SXT a better dividend stock?

Is RPM or SXT more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

SXT vs. The Competition

Sensient Technologies Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools