Sensient Technologies (SXT) Competitors

Sensient Technologies presently has a consensus target price of $140.00, suggesting a potential upside of 4.62%. DuPont de Nemours has a consensus target price of $166.60, suggesting a potential upside of 26.73%. Given DuPont de Nemours' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe DuPont de Nemours is more favorable than Sensient Technologies.

Sensient Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than DuPont de Nemours. Sensient Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than DuPont de Nemours, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Sensient Technologies has a beta of 0.8, suggesting that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, DuPont de Nemours has a beta of 1.06, suggesting that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, DuPont de Nemours had 10 more articles in the media than Sensient Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for DuPont de Nemours and 4 mentions for Sensient Technologies. DuPont de Nemours' average media sentiment score of 1.52 beat Sensient Technologies' score of 1.38 indicating that DuPont de Nemours is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

90.9% of Sensient Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 74.0% of DuPont de Nemours shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of Sensient Technologies shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of DuPont de Nemours shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Sensient Technologies has a net margin of 9.27% compared to DuPont de Nemours' net margin of 0.67%. Sensient Technologies' return on equity of 13.77% beat DuPont de Nemours' return on equity.

Sensient Technologies pays an annual dividend of $1.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. DuPont de Nemours pays an annual dividend of $2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Sensient Technologies pays out 44.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. DuPont de Nemours pays out 533.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Albemarle pays an annual dividend of $1.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Sensient Technologies pays an annual dividend of $1.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Albemarle pays out 600.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Sensient Technologies pays out 44.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Albemarle has raised its dividend for 30 consecutive years. Albemarle is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

92.9% of Albemarle shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.9% of Sensient Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Albemarle shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Sensient Technologies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Albemarle had 12 more articles in the media than Sensient Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Albemarle and 4 mentions for Sensient Technologies. Sensient Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat Albemarle's score of 1.21 indicating that Sensient Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Albemarle presently has a consensus price target of $190.04, indicating a potential upside of 46.61%. Sensient Technologies has a consensus price target of $140.00, indicating a potential upside of 4.62%. Given Albemarle's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Albemarle is more favorable than Sensient Technologies.

Sensient Technologies has a net margin of 9.27% compared to Albemarle's net margin of 3.09%. Sensient Technologies' return on equity of 13.77% beat Albemarle's return on equity.

Albemarle has a beta of 1.33, meaning that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sensient Technologies has a beta of 0.8, meaning that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the broader market.

Sensient Technologies has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Albemarle. Sensient Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Albemarle, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Sensient Technologies pays an annual dividend of $1.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. RPM International pays an annual dividend of $2.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Sensient Technologies pays out 44.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. RPM International pays out 41.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. RPM International has raised its dividend for 51 consecutive years. RPM International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Sensient Technologies had 3 more articles in the media than RPM International. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Sensient Technologies and 1 mentions for RPM International. Sensient Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat RPM International's score of 1.31 indicating that Sensient Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Sensient Technologies has a beta of 0.8, indicating that its share price is 20% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, RPM International has a beta of 1.05, indicating that its share price is 5% more volatile than the broader market.

90.9% of Sensient Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.0% of RPM International shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of Sensient Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of RPM International shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Sensient Technologies currently has a consensus price target of $140.00, suggesting a potential upside of 4.62%. RPM International has a consensus price target of $126.00, suggesting a potential upside of 23.06%. Given RPM International's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe RPM International is more favorable than Sensient Technologies.

RPM International has higher revenue and earnings than Sensient Technologies. RPM International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sensient Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Sensient Technologies has a net margin of 9.27% compared to RPM International's net margin of 8.41%. RPM International's return on equity of 22.45% beat Sensient Technologies' return on equity.

Solstice Advanced Mat has higher revenue and earnings than Sensient Technologies. Sensient Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Solstice Advanced Mat, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

90.9% of Sensient Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Solstice Advanced Mat shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Sensient Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Solstice Advanced Mat had 12 more articles in the media than Sensient Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Solstice Advanced Mat and 4 mentions for Sensient Technologies. Solstice Advanced Mat's average media sentiment score of 1.42 beat Sensient Technologies' score of 1.38 indicating that Solstice Advanced Mat is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Solstice Advanced Mat pays an annual dividend of $0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Sensient Technologies pays an annual dividend of $1.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Solstice Advanced Mat pays out 16.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Sensient Technologies pays out 44.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Sensient Technologies has a net margin of 9.27% compared to Solstice Advanced Mat's net margin of 5.13%. Solstice Advanced Mat's return on equity of 14.28% beat Sensient Technologies' return on equity.

Solstice Advanced Mat presently has a consensus target price of $79.11, indicating a potential upside of 22.60%. Sensient Technologies has a consensus target price of $140.00, indicating a potential upside of 4.62%. Given Solstice Advanced Mat's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Solstice Advanced Mat is more favorable than Sensient Technologies.