S&P 500   3,768.25 (-0.72%)
DOW   30,814.26 (-0.57%)
QQQ   311.86 (-0.79%)
AAPL   127.14 (-1.37%)
MSFT   212.65 (-0.17%)
FB   251.36 (+2.33%)
GOOGL   1,727.62 (-0.19%)
AMZN   3,104.25 (-0.74%)
TSLA   826.16 (-2.23%)
NVDA   514.38 (-2.58%)
BABA   243.46 (+0.20%)
CGC   33.39 (-3.55%)
GE   11.33 (-2.83%)
MU   80.72 (-0.71%)
AMD   88.21 (-2.84%)
T   29.17 (-0.41%)
NIO   56.27 (-7.56%)
F   9.83 (-3.34%)
ACB   12.04 (+0.67%)
BA   204.32 (-2.66%)
DIS   171.44 (-1.15%)
NFLX   497.98 (-0.58%)
GILD   63.33 (+1.49%)
S&P 500   3,768.25 (-0.72%)
DOW   30,814.26 (-0.57%)
QQQ   311.86 (-0.79%)
AAPL   127.14 (-1.37%)
MSFT   212.65 (-0.17%)
FB   251.36 (+2.33%)
GOOGL   1,727.62 (-0.19%)
AMZN   3,104.25 (-0.74%)
TSLA   826.16 (-2.23%)
NVDA   514.38 (-2.58%)
BABA   243.46 (+0.20%)
CGC   33.39 (-3.55%)
GE   11.33 (-2.83%)
MU   80.72 (-0.71%)
AMD   88.21 (-2.84%)
T   29.17 (-0.41%)
NIO   56.27 (-7.56%)
F   9.83 (-3.34%)
ACB   12.04 (+0.67%)
BA   204.32 (-2.66%)
DIS   171.44 (-1.15%)
NFLX   497.98 (-0.58%)
GILD   63.33 (+1.49%)
S&P 500   3,768.25 (-0.72%)
DOW   30,814.26 (-0.57%)
QQQ   311.86 (-0.79%)
AAPL   127.14 (-1.37%)
MSFT   212.65 (-0.17%)
FB   251.36 (+2.33%)
GOOGL   1,727.62 (-0.19%)
AMZN   3,104.25 (-0.74%)
TSLA   826.16 (-2.23%)
NVDA   514.38 (-2.58%)
BABA   243.46 (+0.20%)
CGC   33.39 (-3.55%)
GE   11.33 (-2.83%)
MU   80.72 (-0.71%)
AMD   88.21 (-2.84%)
T   29.17 (-0.41%)
NIO   56.27 (-7.56%)
F   9.83 (-3.34%)
ACB   12.04 (+0.67%)
BA   204.32 (-2.66%)
DIS   171.44 (-1.15%)
NFLX   497.98 (-0.58%)
GILD   63.33 (+1.49%)
S&P 500   3,768.25 (-0.72%)
DOW   30,814.26 (-0.57%)
QQQ   311.86 (-0.79%)
AAPL   127.14 (-1.37%)
MSFT   212.65 (-0.17%)
FB   251.36 (+2.33%)
GOOGL   1,727.62 (-0.19%)
AMZN   3,104.25 (-0.74%)
TSLA   826.16 (-2.23%)
NVDA   514.38 (-2.58%)
BABA   243.46 (+0.20%)
CGC   33.39 (-3.55%)
GE   11.33 (-2.83%)
MU   80.72 (-0.71%)
AMD   88.21 (-2.84%)
T   29.17 (-0.41%)
NIO   56.27 (-7.56%)
F   9.83 (-3.34%)
ACB   12.04 (+0.67%)
BA   204.32 (-2.66%)
DIS   171.44 (-1.15%)
NFLX   497.98 (-0.58%)
GILD   63.33 (+1.49%)
Log in
NYSE:CE

Celanese Competitors

$134.08
-3.49 (-2.54 %)
(As of 01/15/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$133.35
Now: $134.08
$136.69
50-Day Range
$125.93
MA: $131.91
$139.42
52-Week Range
$52.70
Now: $134.08
$140.09
Volume750,328 shs
Average Volume909,877 shs
Market Capitalization$15.67 billion
P/E Ratio27.76
Dividend Yield1.80%
Beta1.21

Competitors

Celanese (NYSE:CE) Vs. SHW, ECL, ALB, IFF, RPM, and ASH

Should you be buying CE stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "specialty chemicals" are considered alternatives and competitors to Celanese, including The Sherwin-Williams (SHW), Ecolab (ECL), Albemarle (ALB), International Flavors & Fragrances (IFF), RPM International (RPM), and Ashland Global (ASH).

The Sherwin-Williams (NYSE:SHW) and Celanese (NYSE:CE) are both large-cap construction companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, dividends and valuation.

Volatility & Risk

The Sherwin-Williams has a beta of 1.14, meaning that its share price is 14% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Celanese has a beta of 1.21, meaning that its share price is 21% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

75.2% of The Sherwin-Williams shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.5% of Celanese shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of The Sherwin-Williams shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Celanese shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

The Sherwin-Williams pays an annual dividend of $5.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Celanese pays an annual dividend of $2.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. The Sherwin-Williams pays out 25.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Celanese pays out 26.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. The Sherwin-Williams has raised its dividend for 40 consecutive years.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares The Sherwin-Williams and Celanese's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The Sherwin-Williams$17.90 billion3.68$1.54 billion$21.1234.35
Celanese$6.30 billion2.49$852 million$9.5314.07

The Sherwin-Williams has higher revenue and earnings than Celanese. Celanese is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The Sherwin-Williams, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for The Sherwin-Williams and Celanese, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
The Sherwin-Williams151602.68
Celanese171202.55

The Sherwin-Williams presently has a consensus target price of $708.05, indicating a potential downside of 2.41%. Celanese has a consensus target price of $118.8947, indicating a potential downside of 11.33%. Given The Sherwin-Williams' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe The Sherwin-Williams is more favorable than Celanese.

Profitability

This table compares The Sherwin-Williams and Celanese's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
The Sherwin-Williams9.83%53.67%9.97%
Celanese10.46%31.41%9.42%

Summary

The Sherwin-Williams beats Celanese on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ecolab (NYSE:ECL) and Celanese (NYSE:CE) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, dividends and valuation.

Dividends

Ecolab pays an annual dividend of $1.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Celanese pays an annual dividend of $2.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Ecolab pays out 33.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Celanese pays out 26.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Ecolab has raised its dividend for 36 consecutive years. Celanese is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Volatility & Risk

Ecolab has a beta of 1.01, meaning that its share price is 1% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Celanese has a beta of 1.21, meaning that its share price is 21% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Ecolab and Celanese's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ecolab$14.91 billion4.04$1.56 billion$5.8236.21
Celanese$6.30 billion2.49$852 million$9.5314.07

Ecolab has higher revenue and earnings than Celanese. Celanese is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ecolab, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

73.6% of Ecolab shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.5% of Celanese shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of Ecolab shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Celanese shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Ecolab and Celanese's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Ecolab-8.21%18.14%6.75%
Celanese10.46%31.41%9.42%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Ecolab and Celanese, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Ecolab112502.22
Celanese171202.55

Ecolab presently has a consensus target price of $201.1538, indicating a potential downside of 4.56%. Celanese has a consensus target price of $118.8947, indicating a potential downside of 11.33%. Given Ecolab's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Ecolab is more favorable than Celanese.

Summary

Celanese beats Ecolab on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Albemarle (NYSE:ALB) and Celanese (NYSE:CE) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, profitability and dividends.

Dividends

Albemarle pays an annual dividend of $1.54 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Celanese pays an annual dividend of $2.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Albemarle pays out 25.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Celanese pays out 26.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Albemarle has increased its dividend for 27 consecutive years.

Risk and Volatility

Albemarle has a beta of 1.59, suggesting that its stock price is 59% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Celanese has a beta of 1.21, suggesting that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Albemarle and Celanese's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Albemarle$3.59 billion5.34$533.23 million$6.0429.82
Celanese$6.30 billion2.49$852 million$9.5314.07

Celanese has higher revenue and earnings than Albemarle. Celanese is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Albemarle, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

86.4% of Albemarle shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.5% of Celanese shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Albemarle shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Celanese shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Albemarle and Celanese's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Albemarle11.77%11.96%4.97%
Celanese10.46%31.41%9.42%

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Albemarle and Celanese, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Albemarle611602.00
Celanese171202.55

Albemarle currently has a consensus target price of $100.00, indicating a potential downside of 44.49%. Celanese has a consensus target price of $118.8947, indicating a potential downside of 11.33%. Given Celanese's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Celanese is more favorable than Albemarle.

Summary

Celanese beats Albemarle on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

International Flavors & Fragrances (NYSE:IFF) and Celanese (NYSE:CE) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, profitability and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares International Flavors & Fragrances and Celanese's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
International Flavors & Fragrances7.44%11.00%5.10%
Celanese10.46%31.41%9.42%

Insider & Institutional Ownership

94.4% of International Flavors & Fragrances shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.5% of Celanese shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of International Flavors & Fragrances shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Celanese shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk and Volatility

International Flavors & Fragrances has a beta of 0.97, suggesting that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Celanese has a beta of 1.21, suggesting that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for International Flavors & Fragrances and Celanese, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
International Flavors & Fragrances14702.50
Celanese171202.55

International Flavors & Fragrances currently has a consensus target price of $139.2833, indicating a potential upside of 18.32%. Celanese has a consensus target price of $118.8947, indicating a potential downside of 11.33%. Given International Flavors & Fragrances' higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe International Flavors & Fragrances is more favorable than Celanese.

Dividends

International Flavors & Fragrances pays an annual dividend of $3.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Celanese pays an annual dividend of $2.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. International Flavors & Fragrances pays out 49.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Celanese pays out 26.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. International Flavors & Fragrances has increased its dividend for 11 consecutive years. International Flavors & Fragrances is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares International Flavors & Fragrances and Celanese's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
International Flavors & Fragrances$5.14 billion2.45$455.87 million$6.1719.08
Celanese$6.30 billion2.49$852 million$9.5314.07

Celanese has higher revenue and earnings than International Flavors & Fragrances. Celanese is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than International Flavors & Fragrances, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Celanese beats International Flavors & Fragrances on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Celanese (NYSE:CE) and RPM International (NYSE:RPM) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, valuation, risk and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares Celanese and RPM International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Celanese10.46%31.41%9.42%
RPM International6.72%33.83%8.24%

Insider & Institutional Ownership

97.5% of Celanese shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.8% of RPM International shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Celanese shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of RPM International shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk & Volatility

Celanese has a beta of 1.21, indicating that its share price is 21% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, RPM International has a beta of 1.12, indicating that its share price is 12% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for Celanese and RPM International, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Celanese171202.55
RPM International05402.44

Celanese currently has a consensus target price of $118.8947, indicating a potential downside of 11.33%. RPM International has a consensus target price of $91.6667, indicating a potential upside of 6.26%. Given RPM International's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe RPM International is more favorable than Celanese.

Dividends

Celanese pays an annual dividend of $2.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. RPM International pays an annual dividend of $1.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Celanese pays out 26.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. RPM International pays out 49.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. RPM International has increased its dividend for 19 consecutive years. Celanese is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Celanese and RPM International's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Celanese$6.30 billion2.49$852 million$9.5314.07
RPM International$5.51 billion2.04$304.39 million$3.0728.10

Celanese has higher revenue and earnings than RPM International. Celanese is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than RPM International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Celanese beats RPM International on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Celanese (NYSE:CE) and Ashland Global (NYSE:ASH) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, valuation, risk and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares Celanese and Ashland Global's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Celanese10.46%31.41%9.42%
Ashland Global-21.84%5.40%2.43%

Insider & Institutional Ownership

97.5% of Celanese shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.9% of Ashland Global shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Celanese shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 10.1% of Ashland Global shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk & Volatility

Celanese has a beta of 1.21, indicating that its share price is 21% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ashland Global has a beta of 1.35, indicating that its share price is 35% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for Celanese and Ashland Global, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Celanese171202.55
Ashland Global02702.78

Celanese currently has a consensus target price of $118.8947, indicating a potential downside of 11.33%. Ashland Global has a consensus target price of $87.5556, indicating a potential upside of 3.03%. Given Ashland Global's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Ashland Global is more favorable than Celanese.

Dividends

Celanese pays an annual dividend of $2.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Ashland Global pays an annual dividend of $1.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Celanese pays out 26.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ashland Global pays out 39.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Celanese is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Celanese and Ashland Global's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Celanese$6.30 billion2.49$852 million$9.5314.07
Ashland Global$2.33 billion2.22$-508,000,000.00$2.8030.35

Celanese has higher revenue and earnings than Ashland Global. Celanese is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ashland Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Celanese beats Ashland Global on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Celanese Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
The Sherwin-Williams logo
SHW
The Sherwin-Williams
2.0$725.55-0.9%$65.90 billion$17.90 billion38.68Increase in Short Interest
Ecolab logo
ECL
Ecolab
2.3$210.77-0.8%$60.16 billion$14.91 billion-57.12Analyst Upgrade
Increase in Short Interest
Albemarle logo
ALB
Albemarle
2.1$180.14-1.2%$19.18 billion$3.59 billion50.32Analyst Report
Decrease in Short Interest
International Flavors & Fragrances logo
IFF
International Flavors & Fragrances
2.5$117.72-1.9%$12.59 billion$5.14 billion35.25Analyst Upgrade
RPM International logo
RPM
RPM International
2.2$86.27-0.1%$11.22 billion$5.51 billion29.65
Ashland Global logo
ASH
Ashland Global
1.8$84.98-1.6%$5.15 billion$2.33 billion-10.12Increase in Short Interest
Heavy News Reporting
Quaker Chemical logo
KWR
Quaker Chemical
2.0$271.27-3.3%$4.84 billion$1.13 billion753.55
NewMarket logo
NEU
NewMarket
1.0$422.79-0.4%$4.62 billion$2.19 billion18.41Increase in Short Interest
Heavy News Reporting
W. R. Grace & Co. logo
GRA
W. R. Grace & Co.
2.0$63.25-7.3%$4.19 billion$1.96 billion301.19Analyst Downgrade
High Trading Volume
Heavy News Reporting
PolyOne logo
POL
PolyOne
2.2$44.33-0.0%$4.05 billion$2.86 billion5.93
Balchem logo
BCPC
Balchem
1.6$122.15-1.3%$3.95 billion$643.71 million47.90Increase in Short Interest
Sensient Technologies logo
SXT
Sensient Technologies
1.9$75.13-0.6%$3.18 billion$1.32 billion47.25Increase in Short Interest
Stepan logo
SCL
Stepan
2.0$122.59-1.4%$2.75 billion$1.86 billion25.65Increase in Short Interest
H.B. Fuller logo
FUL
H.B. Fuller
2.3$53.02-1.8%$2.74 billion$2.90 billion24.10Analyst Downgrade
Innospec logo
IOSP
Innospec
2.0$97.27-2.6%$2.39 billion$1.51 billion65.28Analyst Downgrade
Heavy News Reporting
Minerals Technologies logo
MTX
Minerals Technologies
1.9$66.30-2.0%$2.25 billion$1.79 billion20.72Decrease in Short Interest
Ferro logo
FOE
Ferro
1.1$15.56-4.8%$1.28 billion$1.02 billion-259.29
Kraton logo
KRA
Kraton
1.2$31.77-7.1%$1.01 billion$1.80 billion-4.46Analyst Downgrade
FutureFuel logo
FF
FutureFuel
1.3$13.87-2.3%$606.72 million$205.23 million5.33Heavy News Reporting
Landec logo
LNDC
Landec
1.8$10.83-1.8%$317.57 million$590.37 million-6.22
Flotek Industries logo
FTK
Flotek Industries
0.9$1.86-1.6%$135.96 million$119.35 million-0.73Heavy News Reporting
Advanced Emissions Solutions logo
ADES
Advanced Emissions Solutions
0.9$5.50-0.4%$102.01 million$70.09 million-8.33
This page was last updated on 1/15/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.