Go Pro

White Mountains Insurance Group (WTM) Competitors

White Mountains Insurance Group logo
$2,032.62 +0.62 (+0.03%)
Closing price 09/24/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$2,032.68 +0.05 (+0.00%)
As of 05:45 AM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

WTM vs. AIZ, CNA, AFG, FNF, and ORI

Should you buy White Mountains Insurance Group stock or one of its competitors? White Mountains Insurance Group's main competitors and comparable companies include Assurant (AIZ), CNA Financial (CNA), American Financial Group (AFG), Fidelity National Financial (FNF), and Old Republic International (ORI). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "property & casualty insurance" industry.

How does White Mountains Insurance Group compare to Assurant?

Assurant (NYSE:AIZ) and White Mountains Insurance Group (NYSE:WTM) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, valuation and media sentiment.

Assurant has a beta of 0.54, indicating that its share price is 46% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, White Mountains Insurance Group has a beta of 0.3, indicating that its share price is 70% less volatile than the broader market.

Assurant presently has a consensus target price of $327.14, suggesting a potential upside of 25.12%. Given Assurant's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Assurant is more favorable than White Mountains Insurance Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Assurant
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.25
White Mountains Insurance Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

White Mountains Insurance Group has a net margin of 29.29% compared to Assurant's net margin of 7.90%. Assurant's return on equity of 20.40% beat White Mountains Insurance Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Assurant7.90% 20.40% 3.34%
White Mountains Insurance Group 29.29%5.11%2.37%

Assurant pays an annual dividend of $3.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. White Mountains Insurance Group pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Assurant pays out 16.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. White Mountains Insurance Group pays out 0.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Assurant has raised its dividend for 21 consecutive years. Assurant is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

White Mountains Insurance Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Assurant. White Mountains Insurance Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Assurant, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Assurant$12.81B1.01$872.70M$20.9412.49
White Mountains Insurance Group$3.74B1.30$1.11B$439.404.63

92.7% of Assurant shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.7% of White Mountains Insurance Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Assurant shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of White Mountains Insurance Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Assurant had 18 more articles in the media than White Mountains Insurance Group. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Assurant and 1 mentions for White Mountains Insurance Group. Assurant's average media sentiment score of 0.62 beat White Mountains Insurance Group's score of 0.56 indicating that Assurant is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Assurant
6 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
White Mountains Insurance Group
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Assurant beats White Mountains Insurance Group on 14 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does White Mountains Insurance Group compare to CNA Financial?

White Mountains Insurance Group (NYSE:WTM) and CNA Financial (NYSE:CNA) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership and risk.

White Mountains Insurance Group has a beta of 0.3, indicating that its stock price is 70% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CNA Financial has a beta of 0.27, indicating that its stock price is 73% less volatile than the broader market.

White Mountains Insurance Group pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. CNA Financial pays an annual dividend of $1.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. White Mountains Insurance Group pays out 0.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CNA Financial pays out 42.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. CNA Financial has increased its dividend for 9 consecutive years. CNA Financial is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

CNA Financial has higher revenue and earnings than White Mountains Insurance Group. White Mountains Insurance Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CNA Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
White Mountains Insurance Group$3.74B1.30$1.11B$439.404.63
CNA Financial$14.99B0.83$1.28B$4.5510.12

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
White Mountains Insurance Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
CNA Financial
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

In the previous week, CNA Financial had 1 more articles in the media than White Mountains Insurance Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for CNA Financial and 1 mentions for White Mountains Insurance Group. CNA Financial's average media sentiment score of 0.62 beat White Mountains Insurance Group's score of 0.56 indicating that CNA Financial is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
White Mountains Insurance Group
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
CNA Financial
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

88.7% of White Mountains Insurance Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.5% of CNA Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.0% of White Mountains Insurance Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of CNA Financial shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

White Mountains Insurance Group has a net margin of 29.29% compared to CNA Financial's net margin of 8.16%. CNA Financial's return on equity of 11.34% beat White Mountains Insurance Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
White Mountains Insurance Group29.29% 5.11% 2.37%
CNA Financial 8.16%11.34%1.84%

Summary

CNA Financial beats White Mountains Insurance Group on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does White Mountains Insurance Group compare to American Financial Group?

American Financial Group (NYSE:AFG) and White Mountains Insurance Group (NYSE:WTM) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings and profitability.

White Mountains Insurance Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than American Financial Group. White Mountains Insurance Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than American Financial Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
American Financial Group$8.17B1.40$842M$11.4412.10
White Mountains Insurance Group$3.74B1.30$1.11B$439.404.63

White Mountains Insurance Group has a net margin of 29.29% compared to American Financial Group's net margin of 11.51%. American Financial Group's return on equity of 20.35% beat White Mountains Insurance Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
American Financial Group11.51% 20.35% 2.94%
White Mountains Insurance Group 29.29%5.11%2.37%

American Financial Group currently has a consensus price target of $156.00, suggesting a potential upside of 12.74%. Given American Financial Group's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe American Financial Group is more favorable than White Mountains Insurance Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
American Financial Group
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40
White Mountains Insurance Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

64.4% of American Financial Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.7% of White Mountains Insurance Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.9% of American Financial Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of White Mountains Insurance Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

American Financial Group has a beta of 0.6, meaning that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, White Mountains Insurance Group has a beta of 0.3, meaning that its stock price is 70% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, American Financial Group had 13 more articles in the media than White Mountains Insurance Group. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for American Financial Group and 1 mentions for White Mountains Insurance Group. American Financial Group's average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat White Mountains Insurance Group's score of 0.56 indicating that American Financial Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
American Financial Group
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
White Mountains Insurance Group
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

American Financial Group pays an annual dividend of $3.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. White Mountains Insurance Group pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. American Financial Group pays out 30.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. White Mountains Insurance Group pays out 0.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. American Financial Group has raised its dividend for 19 consecutive years. American Financial Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

American Financial Group beats White Mountains Insurance Group on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does White Mountains Insurance Group compare to Fidelity National Financial?

Fidelity National Financial (NYSE:FNF) and White Mountains Insurance Group (NYSE:WTM) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, dividends and profitability.

Fidelity National Financial presently has a consensus target price of $56.00, suggesting a potential upside of 36.95%. Given Fidelity National Financial's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Fidelity National Financial is more favorable than White Mountains Insurance Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Fidelity National Financial
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40
White Mountains Insurance Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

White Mountains Insurance Group has a net margin of 29.29% compared to Fidelity National Financial's net margin of 5.03%. Fidelity National Financial's return on equity of 16.07% beat White Mountains Insurance Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fidelity National Financial5.03% 16.07% 1.30%
White Mountains Insurance Group 29.29%5.11%2.37%

81.2% of Fidelity National Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.7% of White Mountains Insurance Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.7% of Fidelity National Financial shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of White Mountains Insurance Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Fidelity National Financial pays an annual dividend of $2.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.1%. White Mountains Insurance Group pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Fidelity National Financial pays out 73.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. White Mountains Insurance Group pays out 0.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Fidelity National Financial has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Fidelity National Financial is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

White Mountains Insurance Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Fidelity National Financial. White Mountains Insurance Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fidelity National Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fidelity National Financial$14.45B0.76$602M$2.8314.45
White Mountains Insurance Group$3.74B1.30$1.11B$439.404.63

Fidelity National Financial has a beta of 0.93, meaning that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, White Mountains Insurance Group has a beta of 0.3, meaning that its stock price is 70% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Fidelity National Financial had 7 more articles in the media than White Mountains Insurance Group. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Fidelity National Financial and 1 mentions for White Mountains Insurance Group. White Mountains Insurance Group's average media sentiment score of 0.56 beat Fidelity National Financial's score of 0.33 indicating that White Mountains Insurance Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Fidelity National Financial
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
White Mountains Insurance Group
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Fidelity National Financial beats White Mountains Insurance Group on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does White Mountains Insurance Group compare to Old Republic International?

White Mountains Insurance Group (NYSE:WTM) and Old Republic International (NYSE:ORI) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings and risk.

White Mountains Insurance Group pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Old Republic International pays an annual dividend of $1.26 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. White Mountains Insurance Group pays out 0.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Old Republic International pays out 29.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Old Republic International has increased its dividend for 45 consecutive years. Old Republic International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

White Mountains Insurance Group has a net margin of 29.29% compared to Old Republic International's net margin of 11.71%. Old Republic International's return on equity of 15.41% beat White Mountains Insurance Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
White Mountains Insurance Group29.29% 5.11% 2.37%
Old Republic International 11.71%15.41%3.10%

White Mountains Insurance Group has a beta of 0.3, suggesting that its stock price is 70% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Old Republic International has a beta of 0.57, suggesting that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

88.7% of White Mountains Insurance Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 70.9% of Old Republic International shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.0% of White Mountains Insurance Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Old Republic International shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

White Mountains Insurance Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Old Republic International. White Mountains Insurance Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Old Republic International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
White Mountains Insurance Group$3.74B1.30$1.11B$439.404.63
Old Republic International$9.14B1.00$935.40M$4.238.96

Old Republic International has a consensus price target of $41.50, suggesting a potential upside of 9.53%. Given Old Republic International's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Old Republic International is more favorable than White Mountains Insurance Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
White Mountains Insurance Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Old Republic International
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

In the previous week, White Mountains Insurance Group had 1 more articles in the media than Old Republic International. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for White Mountains Insurance Group and 0 mentions for Old Republic International. Old Republic International's average media sentiment score of 1.76 beat White Mountains Insurance Group's score of 0.56 indicating that Old Republic International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
White Mountains Insurance Group Positive
Old Republic International Very Positive

Summary

White Mountains Insurance Group and Old Republic International tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get White Mountains Insurance Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for WTM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding WTM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

WTM vs. The Competition

MetricWhite Mountains Insurance GroupInsurance IndustryFinance SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$4.90B$18.86B$13.71B$23.08B
Dividend Yield0.05%3.23%5.95%3.61%
P/E Ratio4.6316.0124.9627.93
Price / Sales1.3029.97505.5521.78
Price / Cash28.4811.8846.1238.70
Price / Book0.841.992.704.65
Net Income$1.11B$1.80B$1.32B$1.07B
7 Day Performance-1.36%-2.02%-0.68%-1.32%
1 Month Performance-4.94%-4.00%-2.13%-5.42%
1 Year Performance20.16%7.90%9.13%7.64%

White Mountains Insurance Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
WTM
White Mountains Insurance Group
1.4426 of 5 stars
$2,032.63
+0.0%
N/A+15.6%$4.90B$3.74B4.631,648
AIZ
Assurant
4.9385 of 5 stars
$270.99
-2.3%
$327.14
+20.7%
+21.5%$13.37B$12.81B12.9414,800
CNA
CNA Financial
3.5604 of 5 stars
$47.60
-0.4%
N/A0.0%$12.88B$14.99B10.466,600
AFG
American Financial Group
3.9299 of 5 stars
$140.60
-0.5%
$156.00
+11.0%
-4.3%$11.66B$8.17B12.298,500
FNF
Fidelity National Financial
4.9495 of 5 stars
$42.62
+0.4%
$56.00
+31.4%
-31.7%$11.43B$14.45B15.0524,535

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:WTM) was last updated on 9/25/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners