Free Trial

White Mountains Insurance Group (WTM) Competitors

White Mountains Insurance Group logo
$2,154.11 -13.30 (-0.61%)
Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$2,150.39 -3.72 (-0.17%)
As of 04:10 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

WTM vs. FNF, CNA, ERIE, ORI, and AXS

Should you be buying White Mountains Insurance Group stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of White Mountains Insurance Group include Fidelity National Financial (FNF), CNA Financial (CNA), Erie Indemnity (ERIE), Old Republic International (ORI), and Axis Capital (AXS). These companies are all part of the "property & casualty insurance" industry.

How does White Mountains Insurance Group compare to Fidelity National Financial?

White Mountains Insurance Group (NYSE:WTM) and Fidelity National Financial (NYSE:FNF) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, risk and media sentiment.

White Mountains Insurance Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Fidelity National Financial. White Mountains Insurance Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fidelity National Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
White Mountains Insurance Group$3.74B1.43$1.11B$432.354.98
Fidelity National Financial$14.45B0.95$602M$2.1324.02

In the previous week, Fidelity National Financial had 5 more articles in the media than White Mountains Insurance Group. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Fidelity National Financial and 2 mentions for White Mountains Insurance Group. Fidelity National Financial's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat White Mountains Insurance Group's score of 0.51 indicating that Fidelity National Financial is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
White Mountains Insurance Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Fidelity National Financial
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

White Mountains Insurance Group has a beta of 0.32, suggesting that its stock price is 68% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Fidelity National Financial has a beta of 1, suggesting that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.

White Mountains Insurance Group has a net margin of 29.62% compared to Fidelity National Financial's net margin of 4.17%. Fidelity National Financial's return on equity of 15.06% beat White Mountains Insurance Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
White Mountains Insurance Group29.62% 8.12% 3.79%
Fidelity National Financial 4.17%15.06%1.30%

White Mountains Insurance Group pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Fidelity National Financial pays an annual dividend of $2.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. White Mountains Insurance Group pays out 0.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fidelity National Financial pays out 97.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Fidelity National Financial has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Fidelity National Financial is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

88.7% of White Mountains Insurance Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.2% of Fidelity National Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.0% of White Mountains Insurance Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.5% of Fidelity National Financial shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Fidelity National Financial has a consensus price target of $62.67, suggesting a potential upside of 22.48%. Given Fidelity National Financial's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Fidelity National Financial is more favorable than White Mountains Insurance Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
White Mountains Insurance Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Fidelity National Financial
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Summary

Fidelity National Financial beats White Mountains Insurance Group on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does White Mountains Insurance Group compare to CNA Financial?

White Mountains Insurance Group (NYSE:WTM) and CNA Financial (NYSE:CNA) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, dividends and earnings.

White Mountains Insurance Group has a beta of 0.32, indicating that its stock price is 68% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CNA Financial has a beta of 0.35, indicating that its stock price is 65% less volatile than the S&P 500.

88.7% of White Mountains Insurance Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.5% of CNA Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.0% of White Mountains Insurance Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of CNA Financial shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

White Mountains Insurance Group pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. CNA Financial pays an annual dividend of $1.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. White Mountains Insurance Group pays out 0.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CNA Financial pays out 40.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. CNA Financial has increased its dividend for 9 consecutive years. CNA Financial is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
White Mountains Insurance Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
CNA Financial
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

In the previous week, CNA Financial had 17 more articles in the media than White Mountains Insurance Group. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for CNA Financial and 2 mentions for White Mountains Insurance Group. White Mountains Insurance Group's average media sentiment score of 0.51 beat CNA Financial's score of -0.02 indicating that White Mountains Insurance Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
White Mountains Insurance Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
CNA Financial
1 Very Positive mention(s)
6 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
4 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

CNA Financial has higher revenue and earnings than White Mountains Insurance Group. White Mountains Insurance Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CNA Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
White Mountains Insurance Group$3.74B1.43$1.11B$432.354.98
CNA Financial$14.99B0.80$1.28B$4.699.50

White Mountains Insurance Group has a net margin of 29.62% compared to CNA Financial's net margin of 8.08%. CNA Financial's return on equity of 11.57% beat White Mountains Insurance Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
White Mountains Insurance Group29.62% 8.12% 3.79%
CNA Financial 8.08%11.57%1.86%

Summary

CNA Financial beats White Mountains Insurance Group on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does White Mountains Insurance Group compare to Erie Indemnity?

White Mountains Insurance Group (NYSE:WTM) and Erie Indemnity (NASDAQ:ERIE) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, dividends and earnings.

In the previous week, Erie Indemnity had 1 more articles in the media than White Mountains Insurance Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Erie Indemnity and 2 mentions for White Mountains Insurance Group. White Mountains Insurance Group's average media sentiment score of 0.51 beat Erie Indemnity's score of 0.24 indicating that White Mountains Insurance Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
White Mountains Insurance Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Erie Indemnity
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

88.7% of White Mountains Insurance Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.7% of Erie Indemnity shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.0% of White Mountains Insurance Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 45.8% of Erie Indemnity shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

White Mountains Insurance Group pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Erie Indemnity pays an annual dividend of $5.85 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. White Mountains Insurance Group pays out 0.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Erie Indemnity pays out 53.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Erie Indemnity has increased its dividend for 36 consecutive years. Erie Indemnity is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

White Mountains Insurance Group has a net margin of 29.62% compared to Erie Indemnity's net margin of 13.97%. Erie Indemnity's return on equity of 21.50% beat White Mountains Insurance Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
White Mountains Insurance Group29.62% 8.12% 3.79%
Erie Indemnity 13.97%21.50%14.89%

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
White Mountains Insurance Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Erie Indemnity
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

White Mountains Insurance Group has a beta of 0.32, indicating that its stock price is 68% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Erie Indemnity has a beta of 0.33, indicating that its stock price is 67% less volatile than the S&P 500.

White Mountains Insurance Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Erie Indemnity. White Mountains Insurance Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Erie Indemnity, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
White Mountains Insurance Group$3.74B1.43$1.11B$432.354.98
Erie Indemnity$4.07B2.51$559.34M$10.9320.24

Summary

Erie Indemnity beats White Mountains Insurance Group on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does White Mountains Insurance Group compare to Old Republic International?

Old Republic International (NYSE:ORI) and White Mountains Insurance Group (NYSE:WTM) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations and earnings.

White Mountains Insurance Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Old Republic International. White Mountains Insurance Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Old Republic International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Old Republic International$9.14B1.05$935.40M$3.7310.52
White Mountains Insurance Group$3.74B1.43$1.11B$432.354.98

Old Republic International pays an annual dividend of $1.26 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. White Mountains Insurance Group pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Old Republic International pays out 33.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. White Mountains Insurance Group pays out 0.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Old Republic International has raised its dividend for 45 consecutive years. Old Republic International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Old Republic International presently has a consensus price target of $42.00, indicating a potential upside of 7.00%. Given Old Republic International's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Old Republic International is more favorable than White Mountains Insurance Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Old Republic International
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
White Mountains Insurance Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Old Republic International had 12 more articles in the media than White Mountains Insurance Group. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Old Republic International and 2 mentions for White Mountains Insurance Group. Old Republic International's average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat White Mountains Insurance Group's score of 0.51 indicating that Old Republic International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Old Republic International
9 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
White Mountains Insurance Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

White Mountains Insurance Group has a net margin of 29.62% compared to Old Republic International's net margin of 10.83%. Old Republic International's return on equity of 15.71% beat White Mountains Insurance Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Old Republic International10.83% 15.71% 3.23%
White Mountains Insurance Group 29.62%8.12%3.79%

70.9% of Old Republic International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.7% of White Mountains Insurance Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of Old Republic International shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of White Mountains Insurance Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Old Republic International has a beta of 0.63, meaning that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, White Mountains Insurance Group has a beta of 0.32, meaning that its stock price is 68% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Old Republic International beats White Mountains Insurance Group on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does White Mountains Insurance Group compare to Axis Capital?

White Mountains Insurance Group (NYSE:WTM) and Axis Capital (NYSE:AXS) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

White Mountains Insurance Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Axis Capital. White Mountains Insurance Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Axis Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
White Mountains Insurance Group$3.74B1.43$1.11B$432.354.98
Axis Capital$6.56B1.11$1.01B$13.427.36

White Mountains Insurance Group pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Axis Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. White Mountains Insurance Group pays out 0.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Axis Capital pays out 13.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Axis Capital has a consensus price target of $122.50, indicating a potential upside of 23.96%. Given Axis Capital's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Axis Capital is more favorable than White Mountains Insurance Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
White Mountains Insurance Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Axis Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.82

In the previous week, Axis Capital had 17 more articles in the media than White Mountains Insurance Group. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Axis Capital and 2 mentions for White Mountains Insurance Group. Axis Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.64 beat White Mountains Insurance Group's score of 0.51 indicating that Axis Capital is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
White Mountains Insurance Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Axis Capital
5 Very Positive mention(s)
6 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

White Mountains Insurance Group has a net margin of 29.62% compared to Axis Capital's net margin of 16.00%. Axis Capital's return on equity of 18.12% beat White Mountains Insurance Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
White Mountains Insurance Group29.62% 8.12% 3.79%
Axis Capital 16.00%18.12%3.02%

88.7% of White Mountains Insurance Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.4% of Axis Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 3.0% of White Mountains Insurance Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Axis Capital shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

White Mountains Insurance Group has a beta of 0.32, indicating that its stock price is 68% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Axis Capital has a beta of 0.54, indicating that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Axis Capital beats White Mountains Insurance Group on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get White Mountains Insurance Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for WTM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding WTM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

WTM vs. The Competition

MetricWhite Mountains Insurance GroupINS IndustryFinance SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$5.37B$55.53B$13.34B$22.85B
Dividend Yield0.05%1.95%5.80%4.06%
P/E Ratio4.9810.0323.2728.55
Price / Sales1.431.67181.7424.24
Price / Cash30.0511.9320.2425.18
Price / Book0.892.233.435.37
Net Income$1.11B$4.16B$1.11B$1.07B
7 Day Performance-4.86%-2.65%0.03%0.89%
1 Month Performance-0.80%3.17%4.66%6.56%
1 Year Performance20.73%6.92%13.62%31.66%

White Mountains Insurance Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
WTM
White Mountains Insurance Group
2.5929 of 5 stars
$2,154.11
-0.6%
N/AN/A$5.37B$3.74B4.981,648
FNF
Fidelity National Financial
4.7062 of 5 stars
$52.43
+1.1%
$62.67
+19.5%
N/A$14.15B$14.45B24.7324,535
CNA
CNA Financial
2.9465 of 5 stars
$48.57
+1.2%
N/AN/A$13.10B$14.99B10.356,600
ERIE
Erie Indemnity
1.3488 of 5 stars
$230.63
-0.3%
N/AN/A$10.68B$4.07B21.156,667
ORI
Old Republic International
4.7532 of 5 stars
$40.00
-0.6%
$42.00
+5.0%
N/A$9.76B$9.14B10.749,500

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:WTM) was last updated on 5/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners