White Mountains Insurance Group (WTM) Competitors

White Mountains Insurance Group logo
$2,013.06 +9.58 (+0.48%)
Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$2,013.44 +0.38 (+0.02%)
As of 04:14 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

WTM vs. FNF, CNA, ERIE, ORI, and AXS

Should you buy White Mountains Insurance Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares White Mountains Insurance Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with White Mountains Insurance Group include Fidelity National Financial (FNF), CNA Financial (CNA), Erie Indemnity (ERIE), Old Republic International (ORI), and Axis Capital (AXS). These companies are all part of the "property & casualty insurance" industry.

How does White Mountains Insurance Group compare to Fidelity National Financial?

Fidelity National Financial (NYSE:FNF) and White Mountains Insurance Group (NYSE:WTM) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, profitability and analyst recommendations.

White Mountains Insurance Group has a net margin of 28.44% compared to Fidelity National Financial's net margin of 5.10%. Fidelity National Financial's return on equity of 15.49% beat White Mountains Insurance Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fidelity National Financial5.10% 15.49% 1.29%
White Mountains Insurance Group 28.44%9.19%4.27%

Fidelity National Financial presently has a consensus price target of $56.25, suggesting a potential upside of 19.92%. Given Fidelity National Financial's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Fidelity National Financial is more favorable than White Mountains Insurance Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Fidelity National Financial
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.20
White Mountains Insurance Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

In the previous week, Fidelity National Financial had 2 more articles in the media than White Mountains Insurance Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Fidelity National Financial and 0 mentions for White Mountains Insurance Group. Fidelity National Financial's average media sentiment score of 0.64 beat White Mountains Insurance Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Fidelity National Financial is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fidelity National Financial Positive
White Mountains Insurance Group Neutral

Fidelity National Financial pays an annual dividend of $2.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.4%. White Mountains Insurance Group pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Fidelity National Financial pays out 75.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. White Mountains Insurance Group pays out 0.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fidelity National Financial has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Fidelity National Financial is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Fidelity National Financial has a beta of 0.96, meaning that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, White Mountains Insurance Group has a beta of 0.29, meaning that its stock price is 71% less volatile than the broader market.

81.2% of Fidelity National Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.7% of White Mountains Insurance Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.7% of Fidelity National Financial shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of White Mountains Insurance Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

White Mountains Insurance Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Fidelity National Financial. White Mountains Insurance Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fidelity National Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fidelity National Financial$14.45B0.87$602M$2.7417.12
White Mountains Insurance Group$3.74B1.34$1.11B$406.574.95

Summary

Fidelity National Financial beats White Mountains Insurance Group on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does White Mountains Insurance Group compare to CNA Financial?

CNA Financial (NYSE:CNA) and White Mountains Insurance Group (NYSE:WTM) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability and analyst recommendations.

98.5% of CNA Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.7% of White Mountains Insurance Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of CNA Financial shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of White Mountains Insurance Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

White Mountains Insurance Group has a net margin of 28.44% compared to CNA Financial's net margin of 8.08%. CNA Financial's return on equity of 11.57% beat White Mountains Insurance Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CNA Financial8.08% 11.57% 1.86%
White Mountains Insurance Group 28.44%9.19%4.27%

In the previous week, CNA Financial had 1 more articles in the media than White Mountains Insurance Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for CNA Financial and 0 mentions for White Mountains Insurance Group. CNA Financial's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled White Mountains Insurance Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
CNA Financial Neutral
White Mountains Insurance Group Neutral

CNA Financial pays an annual dividend of $1.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. White Mountains Insurance Group pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. CNA Financial pays out 43.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. White Mountains Insurance Group pays out 0.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. CNA Financial has raised its dividend for 9 consecutive years. CNA Financial is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

CNA Financial has a beta of 0.3, meaning that its stock price is 70% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, White Mountains Insurance Group has a beta of 0.29, meaning that its stock price is 71% less volatile than the broader market.

CNA Financial has higher revenue and earnings than White Mountains Insurance Group. White Mountains Insurance Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CNA Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CNA Financial$14.99B0.80$1.28B$4.479.97
White Mountains Insurance Group$3.74B1.34$1.11B$406.574.95

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CNA Financial
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
White Mountains Insurance Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Summary

CNA Financial beats White Mountains Insurance Group on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does White Mountains Insurance Group compare to Erie Indemnity?

Erie Indemnity (NASDAQ:ERIE) and White Mountains Insurance Group (NYSE:WTM) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and valuation.

White Mountains Insurance Group has a net margin of 28.44% compared to Erie Indemnity's net margin of 13.97%. Erie Indemnity's return on equity of 21.50% beat White Mountains Insurance Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Erie Indemnity13.97% 21.50% 14.89%
White Mountains Insurance Group 28.44%9.19%4.27%

In the previous week, Erie Indemnity had 1 more articles in the media than White Mountains Insurance Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Erie Indemnity and 0 mentions for White Mountains Insurance Group. Erie Indemnity's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled White Mountains Insurance Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Erie Indemnity Neutral
White Mountains Insurance Group Neutral

White Mountains Insurance Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Erie Indemnity. White Mountains Insurance Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Erie Indemnity, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Erie Indemnity$4.07B2.51$559.34M$10.9320.23
White Mountains Insurance Group$3.74B1.34$1.11B$406.574.95

33.7% of Erie Indemnity shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.7% of White Mountains Insurance Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 45.8% of Erie Indemnity shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of White Mountains Insurance Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Erie Indemnity has a beta of 0.31, indicating that its stock price is 69% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, White Mountains Insurance Group has a beta of 0.29, indicating that its stock price is 71% less volatile than the broader market.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Erie Indemnity
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
White Mountains Insurance Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Erie Indemnity pays an annual dividend of $5.85 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. White Mountains Insurance Group pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Erie Indemnity pays out 53.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. White Mountains Insurance Group pays out 0.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Erie Indemnity has increased its dividend for 36 consecutive years. Erie Indemnity is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Erie Indemnity beats White Mountains Insurance Group on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does White Mountains Insurance Group compare to Old Republic International?

White Mountains Insurance Group (NYSE:WTM) and Old Republic International (NYSE:ORI) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings and institutional ownership.

White Mountains Insurance Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Old Republic International. White Mountains Insurance Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Old Republic International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
White Mountains Insurance Group$3.74B1.34$1.11B$406.574.95
Old Republic International$9.14B1.03$935.40M$3.7310.39

White Mountains Insurance Group has a net margin of 28.44% compared to Old Republic International's net margin of 10.83%. Old Republic International's return on equity of 15.71% beat White Mountains Insurance Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
White Mountains Insurance Group28.44% 9.19% 4.27%
Old Republic International 10.83%15.71%3.23%

In the previous week, Old Republic International had 6 more articles in the media than White Mountains Insurance Group. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Old Republic International and 0 mentions for White Mountains Insurance Group. Old Republic International's average media sentiment score of 1.21 beat White Mountains Insurance Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Old Republic International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
White Mountains Insurance Group Neutral
Old Republic International Positive

Old Republic International has a consensus target price of $42.00, suggesting a potential upside of 8.36%. Given Old Republic International's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Old Republic International is more favorable than White Mountains Insurance Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
White Mountains Insurance Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Old Republic International
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

88.7% of White Mountains Insurance Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 70.9% of Old Republic International shares are held by institutional investors. 3.0% of White Mountains Insurance Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Old Republic International shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

White Mountains Insurance Group has a beta of 0.29, suggesting that its stock price is 71% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Old Republic International has a beta of 0.59, suggesting that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

White Mountains Insurance Group pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Old Republic International pays an annual dividend of $1.26 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. White Mountains Insurance Group pays out 0.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Old Republic International pays out 33.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Old Republic International has increased its dividend for 45 consecutive years. Old Republic International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Old Republic International beats White Mountains Insurance Group on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does White Mountains Insurance Group compare to Axis Capital?

Axis Capital (NYSE:AXS) and White Mountains Insurance Group (NYSE:WTM) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability and valuation.

Axis Capital currently has a consensus target price of $122.10, indicating a potential upside of 20.86%. Given Axis Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Axis Capital is more favorable than White Mountains Insurance Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Axis Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80
White Mountains Insurance Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

White Mountains Insurance Group has a net margin of 28.44% compared to Axis Capital's net margin of 16.00%. Axis Capital's return on equity of 18.12% beat White Mountains Insurance Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Axis Capital16.00% 18.12% 3.02%
White Mountains Insurance Group 28.44%9.19%4.27%

In the previous week, Axis Capital had 19 more articles in the media than White Mountains Insurance Group. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Axis Capital and 0 mentions for White Mountains Insurance Group. Axis Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.66 beat White Mountains Insurance Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Axis Capital is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Axis Capital Positive
White Mountains Insurance Group Neutral

White Mountains Insurance Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Axis Capital. White Mountains Insurance Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Axis Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Axis Capital$6.56B1.13$1.01B$13.427.53
White Mountains Insurance Group$3.74B1.34$1.11B$406.574.95

Axis Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. White Mountains Insurance Group pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Axis Capital pays out 13.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. White Mountains Insurance Group pays out 0.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

93.4% of Axis Capital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.7% of White Mountains Insurance Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Axis Capital shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of White Mountains Insurance Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Axis Capital has a beta of 0.51, meaning that its share price is 49% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, White Mountains Insurance Group has a beta of 0.29, meaning that its share price is 71% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Axis Capital beats White Mountains Insurance Group on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get White Mountains Insurance Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for WTM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding WTM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

WTM vs. The Competition

MetricWhite Mountains Insurance GroupINS IndustryFinance SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$4.96B$58.90B$13.96B$23.14B
Dividend Yield0.05%1.88%5.75%4.07%
P/E Ratio4.9510.7320.1631.62
Price / Sales1.341.67146.0422.79
Price / Cash27.7812.3719.4524.08
Price / Book0.841.982.254.68
Net Income$1.11B$4.24B$1.14B$1.08B
7 Day Performance1.15%0.88%-0.22%-0.26%
1 Month Performance-5.82%-0.41%1.52%2.17%
1 Year Performance15.12%9.24%12.23%24.66%

White Mountains Insurance Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
WTM
White Mountains Insurance Group
2.5482 of 5 stars
$2,013.07
+0.5%
N/A+14.5%$4.96B$3.74B4.951,648
FNF
Fidelity National Financial
4.7909 of 5 stars
$47.53
-1.1%
$56.25
+18.4%
-13.0%$12.83B$14.45B17.4224,535
CNA
CNA Financial
2.7913 of 5 stars
$45.40
+1.1%
N/A+0.8%$12.26B$14.99B10.146,600
ERIE
Erie Indemnity
1.6307 of 5 stars
$225.19
+0.5%
N/A-36.9%$10.38B$4.07B20.566,667
ORI
Old Republic International
4.6712 of 5 stars
$38.95
+1.0%
$42.00
+7.8%
+5.1%$9.44B$9.14B10.429,500

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:WTM) was last updated on 6/18/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners