White Mountains Insurance Group (WTM) Competitors

In the previous week, CNA Financial had 2 more articles in the media than White Mountains Insurance Group. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for CNA Financial and 4 mentions for White Mountains Insurance Group. White Mountains Insurance Group's average media sentiment score of 1.13 beat CNA Financial's score of 1.06 indicating that White Mountains Insurance Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

CNA Financial has higher revenue and earnings than White Mountains Insurance Group. White Mountains Insurance Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CNA Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CNA Financial pays an annual dividend of $1.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. White Mountains Insurance Group pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. CNA Financial pays out 42.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. White Mountains Insurance Group pays out 0.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. CNA Financial has increased its dividend for 9 consecutive years. CNA Financial is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

98.5% of CNA Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.7% of White Mountains Insurance Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of CNA Financial shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of White Mountains Insurance Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

CNA Financial has a beta of 0.28, indicating that its share price is 72% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, White Mountains Insurance Group has a beta of 0.29, indicating that its share price is 71% less volatile than the broader market.

White Mountains Insurance Group has a net margin of 29.29% compared to CNA Financial's net margin of 8.16%. CNA Financial's return on equity of 11.34% beat White Mountains Insurance Group's return on equity.

In the previous week, Fidelity National Financial had 3 more articles in the media than White Mountains Insurance Group. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Fidelity National Financial and 4 mentions for White Mountains Insurance Group. White Mountains Insurance Group's average media sentiment score of 1.13 beat Fidelity National Financial's score of 0.83 indicating that White Mountains Insurance Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Fidelity National Financial has a beta of 0.95, suggesting that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, White Mountains Insurance Group has a beta of 0.29, suggesting that its stock price is 71% less volatile than the broader market.

Fidelity National Financial pays an annual dividend of $2.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.4%. White Mountains Insurance Group pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Fidelity National Financial pays out 73.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. White Mountains Insurance Group pays out 0.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Fidelity National Financial has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Fidelity National Financial is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Fidelity National Financial presently has a consensus target price of $56.00, suggesting a potential upside of 18.39%. Given Fidelity National Financial's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Fidelity National Financial is more favorable than White Mountains Insurance Group.

White Mountains Insurance Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Fidelity National Financial. White Mountains Insurance Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fidelity National Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

81.2% of Fidelity National Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.7% of White Mountains Insurance Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.7% of Fidelity National Financial shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of White Mountains Insurance Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

White Mountains Insurance Group has a net margin of 29.29% compared to Fidelity National Financial's net margin of 5.03%. Fidelity National Financial's return on equity of 16.07% beat White Mountains Insurance Group's return on equity.

American Financial Group pays an annual dividend of $3.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. White Mountains Insurance Group pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. American Financial Group pays out 30.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. White Mountains Insurance Group pays out 0.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. American Financial Group has raised its dividend for 19 consecutive years. American Financial Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

White Mountains Insurance Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than American Financial Group. White Mountains Insurance Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than American Financial Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

American Financial Group presently has a consensus price target of $156.00, indicating a potential upside of 9.44%. Given American Financial Group's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe American Financial Group is more favorable than White Mountains Insurance Group.

64.4% of American Financial Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.7% of White Mountains Insurance Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.9% of American Financial Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of White Mountains Insurance Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

American Financial Group has a beta of 0.62, suggesting that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, White Mountains Insurance Group has a beta of 0.29, suggesting that its stock price is 71% less volatile than the broader market.

White Mountains Insurance Group has a net margin of 29.29% compared to American Financial Group's net margin of 11.51%. American Financial Group's return on equity of 20.35% beat White Mountains Insurance Group's return on equity.

In the previous week, American Financial Group had 6 more articles in the media than White Mountains Insurance Group. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for American Financial Group and 4 mentions for White Mountains Insurance Group. White Mountains Insurance Group's average media sentiment score of 1.13 beat American Financial Group's score of 0.97 indicating that White Mountains Insurance Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

White Mountains Insurance Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Old Republic International. White Mountains Insurance Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Old Republic International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Old Republic International presently has a consensus price target of $41.50, indicating a potential downside of 1.78%. Given Old Republic International's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Old Republic International is more favorable than White Mountains Insurance Group.

70.9% of Old Republic International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.7% of White Mountains Insurance Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of Old Republic International shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of White Mountains Insurance Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

White Mountains Insurance Group has a net margin of 29.29% compared to Old Republic International's net margin of 11.71%. Old Republic International's return on equity of 15.41% beat White Mountains Insurance Group's return on equity.

Old Republic International pays an annual dividend of $1.26 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. White Mountains Insurance Group pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Old Republic International pays out 29.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. White Mountains Insurance Group pays out 0.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Old Republic International has raised its dividend for 45 consecutive years. Old Republic International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Old Republic International and Old Republic International both had 4 articles in the media. White Mountains Insurance Group's average media sentiment score of 1.13 beat Old Republic International's score of 0.94 indicating that White Mountains Insurance Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Old Republic International has a beta of 0.58, suggesting that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, White Mountains Insurance Group has a beta of 0.29, suggesting that its stock price is 71% less volatile than the broader market.