Mercury General (MCY) Competitors

Mercury General has a net margin of 13.68% compared to Fidelity National Financial's net margin of 5.10%. Mercury General's return on equity of 32.94% beat Fidelity National Financial's return on equity.

Fidelity National Financial currently has a consensus price target of $56.00, suggesting a potential upside of 14.71%. Mercury General has a consensus price target of $100.00, suggesting a potential downside of 9.36%. Given Fidelity National Financial's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Fidelity National Financial is more favorable than Mercury General.

Fidelity National Financial has a beta of 0.96, suggesting that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mercury General has a beta of 0.89, suggesting that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the broader market.

Fidelity National Financial has higher revenue and earnings than Mercury General. Mercury General is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fidelity National Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Mercury General had 2 more articles in the media than Fidelity National Financial. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Mercury General and 6 mentions for Fidelity National Financial. Fidelity National Financial's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Mercury General's score of 0.49 indicating that Fidelity National Financial is being referred to more favorably in the media.

81.2% of Fidelity National Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.4% of Mercury General shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.7% of Fidelity National Financial shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 35.5% of Mercury General shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Fidelity National Financial pays an annual dividend of $2.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. Mercury General pays an annual dividend of $1.27 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Fidelity National Financial pays out 75.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Mercury General pays out 8.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fidelity National Financial has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Fidelity National Financial is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Erie Indemnity has a net margin of 13.97% compared to Mercury General's net margin of 13.68%. Mercury General's return on equity of 32.94% beat Erie Indemnity's return on equity.

Erie Indemnity pays an annual dividend of $5.85 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Mercury General pays an annual dividend of $1.27 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Erie Indemnity pays out 53.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Mercury General pays out 8.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Erie Indemnity has raised its dividend for 36 consecutive years. Erie Indemnity is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Mercury General had 8 more articles in the media than Erie Indemnity. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Mercury General and 0 mentions for Erie Indemnity. Mercury General's average media sentiment score of 0.49 beat Erie Indemnity's score of 0.00 indicating that Mercury General is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Mercury General has a consensus target price of $100.00, suggesting a potential downside of 9.36%. Given Mercury General's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Mercury General is more favorable than Erie Indemnity.

Erie Indemnity has a beta of 0.3, meaning that its share price is 70% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mercury General has a beta of 0.89, meaning that its share price is 11% less volatile than the broader market.

Erie Indemnity has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Mercury General. Mercury General is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Erie Indemnity, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

33.7% of Erie Indemnity shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.4% of Mercury General shares are owned by institutional investors. 45.8% of Erie Indemnity shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 35.5% of Mercury General shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

42.4% of Mercury General shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 70.9% of Old Republic International shares are held by institutional investors. 35.5% of Mercury General shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Old Republic International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Mercury General has a beta of 0.89, meaning that its share price is 11% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Old Republic International has a beta of 0.58, meaning that its share price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

Mercury General has a net margin of 13.68% compared to Old Republic International's net margin of 10.83%. Mercury General's return on equity of 32.94% beat Old Republic International's return on equity.

Old Republic International has higher revenue and earnings than Mercury General. Mercury General is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Old Republic International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Mercury General presently has a consensus target price of $100.00, suggesting a potential downside of 9.36%. Old Republic International has a consensus target price of $42.00, suggesting a potential upside of 1.21%. Given Old Republic International's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Old Republic International is more favorable than Mercury General.

In the previous week, Mercury General had 5 more articles in the media than Old Republic International. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Mercury General and 3 mentions for Old Republic International. Old Republic International's average media sentiment score of 1.40 beat Mercury General's score of 0.49 indicating that Old Republic International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Mercury General pays an annual dividend of $1.27 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Old Republic International pays an annual dividend of $1.26 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Mercury General pays out 8.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Old Republic International pays out 33.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Old Republic International has raised its dividend for 45 consecutive years. Old Republic International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Axis Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Mercury General. Mercury General is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Axis Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Axis Capital has a beta of 0.49, suggesting that its share price is 51% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mercury General has a beta of 0.89, suggesting that its share price is 11% less volatile than the broader market.

Axis Capital presently has a consensus target price of $122.70, suggesting a potential upside of 8.53%. Mercury General has a consensus target price of $100.00, suggesting a potential downside of 9.36%. Given Axis Capital's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Axis Capital is more favorable than Mercury General.

Axis Capital has a net margin of 16.00% compared to Mercury General's net margin of 13.68%. Mercury General's return on equity of 32.94% beat Axis Capital's return on equity.

Axis Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Mercury General pays an annual dividend of $1.27 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Axis Capital pays out 13.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Mercury General pays out 8.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Mercury General had 2 more articles in the media than Axis Capital. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Mercury General and 6 mentions for Axis Capital. Mercury General's average media sentiment score of 0.49 beat Axis Capital's score of 0.40 indicating that Mercury General is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

93.4% of Axis Capital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.4% of Mercury General shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Axis Capital shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 35.5% of Mercury General shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.