Free Trial

Aritzia (ATZ) Competitors

Aritzia logo
C$162.94 +3.49 (+2.19%)
As of 06/9/2026 04:19 PM Eastern

ATZ vs. ROOT, QSR, MG, CCL.A, and GIL

Should you buy Aritzia stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Aritzia with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Aritzia include Roots (ROOT), Restaurant Brands International (QSR), Magna International (MG), CCL Industries (CCL.A), and Gildan Activewear (GIL). These companies are all part of the "consumer cyclical" sector.

How does Aritzia compare to Roots?

Roots (TSE:ROOT) and Aritzia (TSE:ATZ) are both consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk and dividends.

Roots has a beta of -0.209448, meaning that its stock price is 121% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aritzia has a beta of 2.009654, meaning that its stock price is 101% more volatile than the broader market.

Aritzia has higher revenue and earnings than Roots. Roots is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aritzia, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
RootsC$277.68M0.64C$2.89MC$0.1237.67
AritziaC$3.70B5.04C$140.00MC$3.2050.92

Roots currently has a consensus target price of C$4.25, indicating a potential downside of 5.97%. Aritzia has a consensus target price of C$174.08, indicating a potential upside of 6.83%. Given Aritzia's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Aritzia is more favorable than Roots.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Roots
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Aritzia
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

0.0% of Roots shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.6% of Aritzia shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.2% of Roots shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Aritzia shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Aritzia has a net margin of 10.31% compared to Roots' net margin of 1.68%. Aritzia's return on equity of 30.33% beat Roots' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Roots1.68% 3.16% 2.29%
Aritzia 10.31%30.33%5.67%

In the previous week, Roots and Roots both had 1 articles in the media. Roots' average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Aritzia's score of 0.00 indicating that Roots is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Roots Positive
Aritzia Neutral

Summary

Aritzia beats Roots on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Aritzia compare to Restaurant Brands International?

Restaurant Brands International (TSE:QSR) and Aritzia (TSE:ATZ) are both large-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and risk.

Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 0.387118, suggesting that its stock price is 61% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aritzia has a beta of 2.009654, suggesting that its stock price is 101% more volatile than the broader market.

67.5% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.6% of Aritzia shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Aritzia shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Aritzia has a net margin of 10.31% compared to Restaurant Brands International's net margin of 9.96%. Aritzia's return on equity of 30.33% beat Restaurant Brands International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Restaurant Brands International9.96% 27.13% 5.81%
Aritzia 10.31%30.33%5.67%

Restaurant Brands International presently has a consensus price target of C$84.00, suggesting a potential downside of 17.21%. Aritzia has a consensus price target of C$174.08, suggesting a potential upside of 6.83%. Given Aritzia's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Aritzia is more favorable than Restaurant Brands International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Restaurant Brands International
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75
Aritzia
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Restaurant Brands International had 1 more articles in the media than Aritzia. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Restaurant Brands International and 1 mentions for Aritzia. Restaurant Brands International's average media sentiment score of 0.50 beat Aritzia's score of 0.00 indicating that Restaurant Brands International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Restaurant Brands International
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Aritzia
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Restaurant Brands International has higher revenue and earnings than Aritzia. Restaurant Brands International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aritzia, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Restaurant Brands InternationalC$9.59B3.67C$793.99MC$2.8335.85
AritziaC$3.70B5.04C$140.00MC$3.2050.92

Summary

Aritzia beats Restaurant Brands International on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Aritzia compare to Magna International?

Aritzia (TSE:ATZ) and Magna International (TSE:MG) are both large-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends and valuation.

Aritzia currently has a consensus price target of C$174.08, indicating a potential upside of 6.83%. Magna International has a consensus price target of C$61.00, indicating a potential downside of 33.81%. Given Aritzia's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Aritzia is more favorable than Magna International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Aritzia
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Magna International
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
4 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.33

40.6% of Aritzia shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 44.8% of Magna International shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Aritzia shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 6.2% of Magna International shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Aritzia has a net margin of 10.31% compared to Magna International's net margin of 1.59%. Aritzia's return on equity of 30.33% beat Magna International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Aritzia10.31% 30.33% 5.67%
Magna International 1.59%5.43%3.82%

In the previous week, Magna International had 3 more articles in the media than Aritzia. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Magna International and 1 mentions for Aritzia. Aritzia's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Magna International's score of -0.04 indicating that Aritzia is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Aritzia
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Magna International
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Aritzia has a beta of 2.009654, indicating that its share price is 101% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Magna International has a beta of 2.193559, indicating that its share price is 119% more volatile than the broader market.

Magna International has higher revenue and earnings than Aritzia. Magna International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aritzia, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
AritziaC$3.70B5.04C$140.00MC$3.2050.92
Magna InternationalC$42.32B0.59C$758.25MC$2.3738.89

Summary

Aritzia beats Magna International on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Aritzia compare to CCL Industries?

Aritzia (TSE:ATZ) and CCL Industries (TSE:CCL.A) are both large-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership and risk.

Aritzia currently has a consensus price target of C$174.08, suggesting a potential upside of 6.83%. Given Aritzia's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Aritzia is more favorable than CCL Industries.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Aritzia
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
CCL Industries
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

40.6% of Aritzia shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.1% of CCL Industries shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Aritzia shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 95.4% of CCL Industries shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Aritzia has a beta of 2.009654, suggesting that its stock price is 101% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CCL Industries has a beta of 0.494243, suggesting that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the broader market.

Aritzia has a net margin of 10.31% compared to CCL Industries' net margin of 9.80%. Aritzia's return on equity of 30.33% beat CCL Industries' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Aritzia10.31% 30.33% 5.67%
CCL Industries 9.80%14.28%6.87%

In the previous week, Aritzia had 1 more articles in the media than CCL Industries. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Aritzia and 0 mentions for CCL Industries. Aritzia's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled CCL Industries'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Aritzia Neutral
CCL Industries Neutral

CCL Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Aritzia. CCL Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aritzia, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
AritziaC$3.70B5.04C$140.00MC$3.2050.92
CCL IndustriesC$7.72B1.85C$679.50MC$4.5718.13

Summary

Aritzia beats CCL Industries on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Aritzia compare to Gildan Activewear?

Gildan Activewear (TSE:GIL) and Aritzia (TSE:ATZ) are both large-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation and dividends.

53.9% of Gildan Activewear shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.6% of Aritzia shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.3% of Gildan Activewear shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Aritzia shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Gildan Activewear currently has a consensus target price of C$88.00, suggesting a potential upside of 6.61%. Aritzia has a consensus target price of C$174.08, suggesting a potential upside of 6.83%. Given Aritzia's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Aritzia is more favorable than Gildan Activewear.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gildan Activewear
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60
Aritzia
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Gildan Activewear had 2 more articles in the media than Aritzia. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Gildan Activewear and 1 mentions for Aritzia. Gildan Activewear's average media sentiment score of 0.32 beat Aritzia's score of 0.00 indicating that Gildan Activewear is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Gildan Activewear
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Aritzia
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Aritzia has a net margin of 10.31% compared to Gildan Activewear's net margin of 6.14%. Aritzia's return on equity of 30.33% beat Gildan Activewear's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gildan Activewear6.14% 10.08% 9.32%
Aritzia 10.31%30.33%5.67%

Gildan Activewear has higher revenue and earnings than Aritzia. Gildan Activewear is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aritzia, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gildan ActivewearC$4.07B3.75C$284.77MC$1.6948.84
AritziaC$3.70B5.04C$140.00MC$3.2050.92

Gildan Activewear has a beta of 1.490118, indicating that its stock price is 49% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aritzia has a beta of 2.009654, indicating that its stock price is 101% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Aritzia beats Gildan Activewear on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Aritzia News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ATZ and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ATZ and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

ATZ vs. The Competition

MetricAritziaApparel Retail IndustryCyclical SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$18.67BC$6.38BC$3.93BC$12.74B
Dividend YieldN/A3.36%3.47%6.20%
P/E Ratio50.9266.2977.8536.68
Price / Sales5.0458.70307.4410.18
Price / Cash84.5227.2830.7982.29
Price / Book13.725.743.244.38
Net IncomeC$140.00MC$256.81MC$249.12MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance1.62%0.88%-0.89%-2.58%
1 Month Performance9.83%9.24%0.39%-2.14%
1 Year Performance133.44%26.63%-0.37%41.49%

Aritzia Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
ATZ
Aritzia
1.239 of 5 stars
C$162.94
+2.2%
C$174.08
+6.8%
+140.0%C$18.67BC$3.70B50.928,300
ROOT
Roots
1.1272 of 5 stars
C$4.42
+4.2%
C$4.13
-6.7%
+49.2%C$173.25MC$277.68M36.83760
QSR
Restaurant Brands International
1.4452 of 5 stars
C$100.78
-2.3%
C$84.00
-16.7%
+6.3%C$34.97BC$9.59B35.616,400
MG
Magna International
2.3365 of 5 stars
C$90.13
+0.9%
C$61.00
-32.3%
+80.7%C$24.91BC$42.32B38.03165,000
CCL.A
CCL Industries
N/AC$84.50
-4.6%
N/AN/AC$15.30BC$7.72B18.4921,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:ATZ) was last updated on 6/10/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners