Go Pro

Element Fleet Management (EFN) Competitors

Element Fleet Management logo
C$24.83 -0.18 (-0.72%)
As of 09/11/2026 04:19 PM Eastern

EFN vs. RBA, BYD, BDI, KBL, and GFL

Should you buy Element Fleet Management stock or one of its competitors? Element Fleet Management's main competitors and comparable companies include RB Global (RBA), Boyd Group Services (BYD), Black Diamond Group (BDI), K-Bro Linen (KBL), and GFL Environmental (GFL). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "commercial services & supplies" industry.

How does Element Fleet Management compare to RB Global?

Element Fleet Management (TSE:EFN) and RB Global (TSE:RBA) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment and risk.

In the previous week, Element Fleet Management had 2 more articles in the media than RB Global. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Element Fleet Management and 0 mentions for RB Global. RB Global's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Element Fleet Management's score of -0.46 indicating that RB Global is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Element Fleet Management Neutral
RB Global Neutral

59.4% of Element Fleet Management shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.3% of RB Global shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Element Fleet Management shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of RB Global shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Element Fleet Management has a net margin of 12.17% compared to RB Global's net margin of 9.97%. Element Fleet Management's return on equity of 10.57% beat RB Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Element Fleet Management12.17% 10.57% 2.97%
RB Global 9.97%8.00%4.03%

Element Fleet Management has a beta of 0.464198, indicating that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, RB Global has a beta of -0.133377, indicating that its share price is 113% less volatile than the broader market.

Element Fleet Management pays an annual dividend of C$0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. RB Global pays an annual dividend of C$1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Element Fleet Management pays out 54.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. RB Global pays out 53.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Element Fleet Management has higher earnings, but lower revenue than RB Global. Element Fleet Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than RB Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Element Fleet ManagementC$2.45B3.96C$244.93MC$0.7433.55
RB GlobalC$4.85B4.43C$206.01MC$2.3249.96

Element Fleet Management currently has a consensus target price of C$42.14, suggesting a potential upside of 69.73%. RB Global has a consensus target price of C$134.50, suggesting a potential upside of 16.04%. Given Element Fleet Management's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Element Fleet Management is more favorable than RB Global.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Element Fleet Management
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
RB Global
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.25

Summary

RB Global beats Element Fleet Management on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Element Fleet Management compare to Boyd Group Services?

Element Fleet Management (TSE:EFN) and Boyd Group Services (TSE:BYD) are both mid-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, profitability, risk, valuation and analyst recommendations.

59.4% of Element Fleet Management shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 57.9% of Boyd Group Services shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Element Fleet Management shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Boyd Group Services shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Element Fleet Management and Element Fleet Management both had 2 articles in the media. Boyd Group Services' average media sentiment score of -0.18 beat Element Fleet Management's score of -0.46 indicating that Boyd Group Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Element Fleet Management
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Boyd Group Services
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Element Fleet Management has a beta of 0.464198, indicating that its stock price is 54% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Boyd Group Services has a beta of 0.931317, indicating that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

Element Fleet Management pays an annual dividend of C$0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Boyd Group Services pays an annual dividend of C$0.45 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Element Fleet Management pays out 54.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Boyd Group Services pays out 99.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Element Fleet Management is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Element Fleet Management has a net margin of 12.17% compared to Boyd Group Services' net margin of 0.26%. Element Fleet Management's return on equity of 10.57% beat Boyd Group Services' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Element Fleet Management12.17% 10.57% 2.97%
Boyd Group Services 0.26%0.61%3.95%

Element Fleet Management presently has a consensus target price of C$42.14, indicating a potential upside of 69.73%. Boyd Group Services has a consensus target price of C$230.00, indicating a potential upside of 84.00%. Given Boyd Group Services' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Boyd Group Services is more favorable than Element Fleet Management.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Element Fleet Management
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Boyd Group Services
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.08

Element Fleet Management has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Boyd Group Services. Element Fleet Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Boyd Group Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Element Fleet ManagementC$2.45B3.96C$244.93MC$0.7433.55
Boyd Group ServicesC$3.59B0.97C$29.07MC$0.45277.78

Summary

Boyd Group Services beats Element Fleet Management on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Element Fleet Management compare to Black Diamond Group?

Element Fleet Management (TSE:EFN) and Black Diamond Group (TSE:BDI) are both industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

Element Fleet Management pays an annual dividend of C$0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Black Diamond Group pays an annual dividend of C$0.17 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Element Fleet Management pays out 54.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Black Diamond Group pays out 48.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Element Fleet Management has higher revenue and earnings than Black Diamond Group. Element Fleet Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Black Diamond Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Element Fleet ManagementC$2.45B3.96C$244.93MC$0.7433.55
Black Diamond GroupC$508.49M2.29C$24.61MC$0.3548.60

Element Fleet Management has a net margin of 12.17% compared to Black Diamond Group's net margin of 4.60%. Element Fleet Management's return on equity of 10.57% beat Black Diamond Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Element Fleet Management12.17% 10.57% 2.97%
Black Diamond Group 4.60%5.89%4.98%

Element Fleet Management presently has a consensus price target of C$42.14, suggesting a potential upside of 69.73%. Black Diamond Group has a consensus price target of C$19.25, suggesting a potential upside of 13.17%. Given Element Fleet Management's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Element Fleet Management is more favorable than Black Diamond Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Element Fleet Management
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Black Diamond Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Element Fleet Management has a beta of 0.464198, indicating that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Black Diamond Group has a beta of 1.05795, indicating that its share price is 6% more volatile than the broader market.

59.4% of Element Fleet Management shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.5% of Black Diamond Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Element Fleet Management shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 23.8% of Black Diamond Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Element Fleet Management had 2 more articles in the media than Black Diamond Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Element Fleet Management and 0 mentions for Black Diamond Group. Black Diamond Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Element Fleet Management's score of -0.46 indicating that Black Diamond Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Element Fleet Management Neutral
Black Diamond Group Neutral

Summary

Element Fleet Management beats Black Diamond Group on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Element Fleet Management compare to K-Bro Linen?

Element Fleet Management (TSE:EFN) and K-Bro Linen (TSE:KBL) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability and earnings.

Element Fleet Management pays an annual dividend of C$0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. K-Bro Linen pays an annual dividend of C$1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Element Fleet Management pays out 54.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. K-Bro Linen pays out 70.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Element Fleet Management presently has a consensus target price of C$42.14, indicating a potential upside of 69.73%. K-Bro Linen has a consensus target price of C$53.17, indicating a potential upside of 26.83%. Given Element Fleet Management's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Element Fleet Management is more favorable than K-Bro Linen.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Element Fleet Management
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
K-Bro Linen
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.17

Element Fleet Management has a beta of 0.464198, indicating that its stock price is 54% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, K-Bro Linen has a beta of 0.908145, indicating that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

Element Fleet Management has a net margin of 12.17% compared to K-Bro Linen's net margin of 3.67%. Element Fleet Management's return on equity of 10.57% beat K-Bro Linen's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Element Fleet Management12.17% 10.57% 2.97%
K-Bro Linen 3.67%7.89%4.90%

Element Fleet Management has higher revenue and earnings than K-Bro Linen. K-Bro Linen is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Element Fleet Management, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Element Fleet ManagementC$2.45B3.96C$244.93MC$0.7433.55
K-Bro LinenC$592.20M0.91C$18.80MC$1.7124.51

59.4% of Element Fleet Management shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.7% of K-Bro Linen shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Element Fleet Management shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of K-Bro Linen shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Element Fleet Management and Element Fleet Management both had 2 articles in the media. K-Bro Linen's average media sentiment score of 0.22 beat Element Fleet Management's score of -0.46 indicating that K-Bro Linen is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Element Fleet Management
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
K-Bro Linen
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Element Fleet Management beats K-Bro Linen on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Element Fleet Management compare to GFL Environmental?

GFL Environmental (TSE:GFL) and Element Fleet Management (TSE:EFN) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership and dividends.

54.9% of GFL Environmental shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.4% of Element Fleet Management shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.0% of GFL Environmental shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Element Fleet Management shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Element Fleet Management has a consensus price target of C$42.14, suggesting a potential upside of 69.73%. Given Element Fleet Management's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Element Fleet Management is more favorable than GFL Environmental.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
GFL Environmental
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
4 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.60
Element Fleet Management
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Element Fleet Management has lower revenue, but higher earnings than GFL Environmental. GFL Environmental is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Element Fleet Management, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
GFL EnvironmentalC$6.97B3.71-C$594.65M-C$0.49N/A
Element Fleet ManagementC$2.45B3.96C$244.93MC$0.7433.55

GFL Environmental pays an annual dividend of C$0.09 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Element Fleet Management pays an annual dividend of C$0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. GFL Environmental pays out -17.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Element Fleet Management pays out 54.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Element Fleet Management has a net margin of 12.17% compared to GFL Environmental's net margin of -3.26%. Element Fleet Management's return on equity of 10.57% beat GFL Environmental's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
GFL Environmental-3.26% -3.32% 1.22%
Element Fleet Management 12.17%10.57%2.97%

GFL Environmental has a beta of 0.050392, suggesting that its stock price is 95% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Element Fleet Management has a beta of 0.464198, suggesting that its stock price is 54% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Element Fleet Management had 1 more articles in the media than GFL Environmental. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Element Fleet Management and 1 mentions for GFL Environmental. GFL Environmental's average media sentiment score of 0.42 beat Element Fleet Management's score of -0.46 indicating that GFL Environmental is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
GFL Environmental
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Element Fleet Management
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Element Fleet Management beats GFL Environmental on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Element Fleet Management News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for EFN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding EFN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

EFN vs. The Competition

MetricElement Fleet ManagementCommercial Services & Supplies IndustryIndustrials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$9.79BC$4.13BC$10.20BC$12.66B
Dividend Yield2.40%5.07%97.17%6.28%
P/E Ratio33.5527.3625.7440.11
Price / Sales3.961,139.55433.009.50
Price / Cash40.0421.6123.7182.29
Price / Book3.684.134.844.67
Net IncomeC$244.93MC$146.17MC$612.68MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-5.77%-0.94%-1.56%-1.33%
1 Month Performance-11.16%-0.57%-3.85%-1.18%
1 Year Performance-33.22%4.78%6.34%23.80%

Element Fleet Management Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
EFN
Element Fleet Management
3.0872 of 5 stars
C$24.83
-0.7%
C$42.14
+69.7%
-33.1%C$9.79BC$2.45B33.552,700
RBA
RB Global
1.7912 of 5 stars
C$114.99
-2.0%
C$134.50
+17.0%
-29.4%C$21.30BC$4.85B49.564,200
BYD
Boyd Group Services
2.6854 of 5 stars
C$114.96
-4.5%
C$230.00
+100.1%
-46.9%C$3.20BC$3.59B255.4715,800
BDI
Black Diamond Group
1.4712 of 5 stars
C$16.96
-0.6%
C$19.25
+13.5%
+40.7%C$1.15BC$508.49M48.46485
KBL
K-Bro Linen
3.8774 of 5 stars
C$46.28
-0.9%
C$53.17
+14.9%
+12.7%C$595.44MC$592.20M27.063,050

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:EFN) was last updated on 9/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners