Go Pro

Generation Mining (GENM) Competitors

Generation Mining logo
C$0.74 -0.02 (-2.63%)
As of 03:59 PM Eastern

GENM vs. ODV, NSR, AU, PTM, and LUC

Should you buy Generation Mining stock or one of its competitors? Generation Mining's main competitors and comparable companies include Osisko Development (ODV), Nomad Royalty (NSR), Aurion Resources (AU), Platinum Group Metals (PTM), and Lucara Diamond (LUC). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "precious metals & minerals" industry.

How does Generation Mining compare to Osisko Development?

Generation Mining (TSE:GENM) and Osisko Development (CVE:ODV) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and dividends.

Osisko Development has a net margin of 149.54% compared to Generation Mining's net margin of 0.00%. Generation Mining's return on equity of 90.73% beat Osisko Development's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Generation MiningN/A 90.73% -71.47%
Osisko Development 149.54%11.45%-16.19%

Osisko Development has a consensus price target of C$9.00, indicating a potential upside of 180.37%. Given Osisko Development's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Osisko Development is more favorable than Generation Mining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Generation Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Osisko Development
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
4.00

In the previous week, Generation Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Osisko Development'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Generation Mining Neutral
Osisko Development Neutral

Generation Mining has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Osisko Development. Osisko Development is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Generation Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Generation MiningN/AN/A-C$22.19M-C$0.19N/A
Osisko DevelopmentC$37.69M25.95-C$332.96M-C$0.49N/A

0.3% of Generation Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 21.8% of Osisko Development shares are owned by institutional investors. 20.4% of Generation Mining shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 34.4% of Osisko Development shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Generation Mining has a beta of 2.107231, indicating that its share price is 111% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Osisko Development has a beta of 2.221719, indicating that its share price is 122% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Osisko Development beats Generation Mining on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Generation Mining compare to Nomad Royalty?

Generation Mining (TSE:GENM) and Nomad Royalty (TSE:NSR) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, valuation and dividends.

0.3% of Generation Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 20.4% of Generation Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Generation Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Nomad Royalty'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Generation Mining Neutral
Nomad Royalty Neutral

Generation Mining's return on equity of 90.73% beat Nomad Royalty's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Generation MiningN/A 90.73% -71.47%
Nomad Royalty N/A N/A N/A

Nomad Royalty has higher revenue and earnings than Generation Mining. Generation Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nomad Royalty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Generation MiningN/AN/A-C$22.19M-C$0.19N/A
Nomad RoyaltyC$31.28M0.00C$614.70KC$0.01N/A

Summary

Nomad Royalty beats Generation Mining on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Generation Mining compare to Aurion Resources?

Aurion Resources (CVE:AU) and Generation Mining (TSE:GENM) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, valuation, dividends and profitability.

Generation Mining's return on equity of 90.73% beat Aurion Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Aurion ResourcesN/A -15.29% -3.68%
Generation Mining N/A 90.73%-71.47%

Aurion Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Generation Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Aurion ResourcesN/AN/A-C$2.59M-C$0.06N/A
Generation MiningN/AN/A-C$22.19M-C$0.19N/A

Aurion Resources has a beta of 0.755643, indicating that its share price is 24% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Generation Mining has a beta of 2.107231, indicating that its share price is 111% more volatile than the broader market.

20.1% of Aurion Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of Generation Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 12.3% of Aurion Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 20.4% of Generation Mining shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Aurion Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Generation Mining'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Aurion Resources Neutral
Generation Mining Neutral

Summary

Aurion Resources and Generation Mining tied by winning 4 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Generation Mining compare to Platinum Group Metals?

Generation Mining (TSE:GENM) and Platinum Group Metals (TSE:PTM) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk and dividends.

Generation Mining has a beta of 2.107231, indicating that its share price is 111% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Platinum Group Metals has a beta of 2.555208, indicating that its share price is 156% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Generation Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Platinum Group Metals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Generation Mining Neutral
Platinum Group Metals Neutral

0.3% of Generation Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.9% of Platinum Group Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 20.4% of Generation Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 26.5% of Platinum Group Metals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Generation Mining's return on equity of 90.73% beat Platinum Group Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Generation MiningN/A 90.73% -71.47%
Platinum Group Metals N/A -7.14%-10.89%

Platinum Group Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Generation Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Generation MiningN/AN/A-C$22.19M-C$0.19N/A
Platinum Group MetalsN/AN/A-C$3.42M-C$0.03N/A

Summary

Platinum Group Metals beats Generation Mining on 6 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Generation Mining compare to Lucara Diamond?

Generation Mining (TSE:GENM) and Lucara Diamond (TSE:LUC) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, risk, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and dividends.

Generation Mining has a beta of 2.107231, meaning that its share price is 111% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lucara Diamond has a beta of 0.303661, meaning that its share price is 70% less volatile than the broader market.

Lucara Diamond has a net margin of 10.15% compared to Generation Mining's net margin of 0.00%. Generation Mining's return on equity of 90.73% beat Lucara Diamond's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Generation MiningN/A 90.73% -71.47%
Lucara Diamond 10.15%4.15%3.82%

Generation Mining has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Lucara Diamond. Generation Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lucara Diamond, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Generation MiningN/AN/A-C$22.19M-C$0.19N/A
Lucara DiamondC$148.50M1.71-C$24.20MC$0.035.67

In the previous week, Generation Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Lucara Diamond'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Generation Mining Neutral
Lucara Diamond Neutral

0.3% of Generation Mining shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.8% of Lucara Diamond shares are held by institutional investors. 20.4% of Generation Mining shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 25.5% of Lucara Diamond shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Lucara Diamond beats Generation Mining on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Generation Mining News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GENM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GENM vs. The Competition

MetricGeneration MiningMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$238.90MC$3.94BC$4.96BC$12.30B
Dividend YieldN/A5.16%4.67%6.24%
P/E Ratio-3.8924.9125.5238.73
Price / SalesN/A8,617.085,123.279.78
Price / Cash5.1626.6824.6982.29
Price / Book-3.5310.498.824.63
Net Income-C$22.19MC$125.14MC$156.32MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-2.63%5.82%4.16%-2.06%
1 Month Performance23.33%22.40%17.33%3.57%
1 Year Performance97.33%56.84%44.23%27.72%

Generation Mining Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GENM
Generation Mining
N/AC$0.74
-2.6%
N/A+102.7%C$238.90MN/AN/A17
ODV
Osisko Development
N/AC$3.21
flat
C$9.00
+180.4%
-14.2%C$978.15MC$37.69MN/A310
NSR
Nomad Royalty
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$594.42MC$31.28M967.006
AU
Aurion Resources
N/AC$2.60
flat
N/A+173.2%C$437.85MN/AN/A20,730
PTM
Platinum Group Metals
N/AC$2.09
-3.7%
N/A-5.0%C$267.28MN/AN/A10

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:GENM) was last updated on 9/1/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners