Go Pro
→ Ticker Revealed: Pre-IPO Access to 'Next Elon Musk' Company (From Banyan Hill Publishing) (Ad)tc pixel Free LUC Stock Alerts

Lucara Diamond (LUC) Competitors

Lucara Diamond logo
C$0.17 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 04:00 PM Eastern
Compare

LUC vs. ODV, NSR, AU, PTM, and GENM

Should you buy Lucara Diamond stock or one of its competitors? Lucara Diamond's main competitors and comparable companies include Osisko Development (ODV), Nomad Royalty (NSR), Aurion Resources (AU), Platinum Group Metals (PTM), and Generation Mining (GENM). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "precious metals & minerals" industry.

How does Lucara Diamond compare to Osisko Development?

Osisko Development (CVE:ODV) and Lucara Diamond (TSE:LUC) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment and dividends.

Osisko Development has a beta of 2.221719, indicating that its stock price is 122% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lucara Diamond has a beta of 0.303661, indicating that its stock price is 70% less volatile than the broader market.

Osisko Development currently has a consensus target price of C$9.00, indicating a potential upside of 180.37%. Given Osisko Development's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Osisko Development is more favorable than Lucara Diamond.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Osisko Development
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
4.00
Lucara Diamond
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Osisko Development has a net margin of 149.54% compared to Lucara Diamond's net margin of 10.15%. Osisko Development's return on equity of 11.45% beat Lucara Diamond's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Osisko Development149.54% 11.45% -16.19%
Lucara Diamond 10.15%4.15%3.82%

21.8% of Osisko Development shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.8% of Lucara Diamond shares are owned by institutional investors. 34.4% of Osisko Development shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 25.5% of Lucara Diamond shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Osisko Development's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Lucara Diamond'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Osisko Development Neutral
Lucara Diamond Neutral

Lucara Diamond has higher revenue and earnings than Osisko Development. Osisko Development is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lucara Diamond, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Osisko DevelopmentC$37.69M25.95-C$332.96M-C$0.49N/A
Lucara DiamondC$148.50M1.71-C$24.20MC$0.035.67

Summary

Osisko Development beats Lucara Diamond on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lucara Diamond compare to Nomad Royalty?

Lucara Diamond (TSE:LUC) and Nomad Royalty (TSE:NSR) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership and valuation.

Nomad Royalty has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Lucara Diamond. Nomad Royalty is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lucara Diamond, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lucara DiamondC$148.50M1.71-C$24.20MC$0.035.67
Nomad RoyaltyC$31.28M0.00C$614.70KC$0.01N/A

Lucara Diamond has a net margin of 10.15% compared to Nomad Royalty's net margin of 0.00%. Lucara Diamond's return on equity of 4.15% beat Nomad Royalty's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lucara Diamond10.15% 4.15% 3.82%
Nomad Royalty N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Lucara Diamond's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Nomad Royalty'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Lucara Diamond Neutral
Nomad Royalty Neutral

4.8% of Lucara Diamond shares are held by institutional investors. 25.5% of Lucara Diamond shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Lucara Diamond beats Nomad Royalty on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lucara Diamond compare to Aurion Resources?

Aurion Resources (CVE:AU) and Lucara Diamond (TSE:LUC) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Aurion Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Lucara Diamond. Aurion Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lucara Diamond, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Aurion ResourcesN/AN/A-C$2.59M-C$0.06N/A
Lucara DiamondC$148.50M1.71-C$24.20MC$0.035.67

Aurion Resources has a beta of 0.755643, meaning that its share price is 24% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lucara Diamond has a beta of 0.303661, meaning that its share price is 70% less volatile than the broader market.

20.1% of Aurion Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.8% of Lucara Diamond shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.3% of Aurion Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 25.5% of Lucara Diamond shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Lucara Diamond has a net margin of 10.15% compared to Aurion Resources' net margin of 0.00%. Lucara Diamond's return on equity of 4.15% beat Aurion Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Aurion ResourcesN/A -15.29% -3.68%
Lucara Diamond 10.15%4.15%3.82%

In the previous week, Aurion Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Lucara Diamond'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Aurion Resources Neutral
Lucara Diamond Neutral

Summary

Lucara Diamond beats Aurion Resources on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lucara Diamond compare to Platinum Group Metals?

Lucara Diamond (TSE:LUC) and Platinum Group Metals (TSE:PTM) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

Lucara Diamond has a beta of 0.303661, meaning that its stock price is 70% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Platinum Group Metals has a beta of 2.555208, meaning that its stock price is 156% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Lucara Diamond's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Platinum Group Metals' score of -0.57 indicating that Lucara Diamond is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Lucara Diamond Neutral
Platinum Group Metals Negative

Lucara Diamond has a net margin of 10.15% compared to Platinum Group Metals' net margin of 0.00%. Lucara Diamond's return on equity of 4.15% beat Platinum Group Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lucara Diamond10.15% 4.15% 3.82%
Platinum Group Metals N/A -7.14%-10.89%

4.8% of Lucara Diamond shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.9% of Platinum Group Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 25.5% of Lucara Diamond shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 26.5% of Platinum Group Metals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Platinum Group Metals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Lucara Diamond. Platinum Group Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lucara Diamond, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lucara DiamondC$148.50M1.71-C$24.20MC$0.035.67
Platinum Group MetalsN/AN/A-C$3.42M-C$0.03N/A

Summary

Lucara Diamond beats Platinum Group Metals on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lucara Diamond compare to Generation Mining?

Lucara Diamond (TSE:LUC) and Generation Mining (TSE:GENM) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability and institutional ownership.

Lucara Diamond has a beta of 0.303661, suggesting that its stock price is 70% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Generation Mining has a beta of 2.107231, suggesting that its stock price is 111% more volatile than the broader market.

4.8% of Lucara Diamond shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of Generation Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 25.5% of Lucara Diamond shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 20.4% of Generation Mining shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Lucara Diamond's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Generation Mining'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Lucara Diamond Neutral
Generation Mining Neutral

Lucara Diamond has a net margin of 10.15% compared to Generation Mining's net margin of 0.00%. Generation Mining's return on equity of 90.73% beat Lucara Diamond's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lucara Diamond10.15% 4.15% 3.82%
Generation Mining N/A 90.73%-71.47%

Generation Mining has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Lucara Diamond. Generation Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lucara Diamond, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lucara DiamondC$148.50M1.71-C$24.20MC$0.035.67
Generation MiningN/AN/A-C$22.19M-C$0.19N/A

Summary

Lucara Diamond beats Generation Mining on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Lucara Diamond News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for LUC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

LUC vs. The Competition

Export
MetricLucara DiamondMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$253.80MC$4.05BC$5.06BC$12.57B
Dividend Yield21.51%5.17%4.67%6.25%
P/E Ratio5.6725.5926.1439.47
Price / Sales1.718,893.195,289.969.82
Price / Cash6.7529.6827.0982.29
Price / Book0.4612.7410.634.71
Net Income-C$24.20MC$125.14MC$156.32MC$299.09M
7 Day PerformanceN/A-1.20%-0.98%-1.21%
1 Month Performance9.68%24.03%18.38%4.89%
1 Year Performance-24.44%56.14%44.32%28.63%

Lucara Diamond Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
LUC
Lucara Diamond
N/AC$0.17
flat		N/A-20.9%C$253.80MC$148.50M5.67324
ODV
Osisko Development
N/AC$3.21
flat		C$9.00
+180.4%		-15.3%C$978.15MC$37.69MN/A310
NSR
Nomad Royalty
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$594.42MC$31.28M967.006
AU
Aurion Resources
N/AC$2.60
flat		N/A+135.9%C$437.85MN/AN/A20,730
PTM
Platinum Group Metals
N/AC$2.09
-3.7%		N/A-9.8%C$267.28MN/AN/A10

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:LUC) was last updated on 9/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid
A small Colorado company has secured rights to technology that could prevent the U.S. public power grid from c...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
The $15 Gold Fund That Pays Up to $1,152/Month
Gold is hitting record highs, but most investors are leaving income on the table. A $15 fund is quietly paying...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran War Shock: What I Was Told In That Private Meeting
You’re Being LIED To About The Iran War Forget EVERYTHING you’ve heard about the Iran war. Especially th...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel