Free Trial

iFabric (IFA) Competitors

iFabric logo
C$4.14 +0.01 (+0.24%)
As of 03:59 PM Eastern

IFA vs. UNI, RYU, GIL, GOOS, and PBL

Should you be buying iFabric stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of iFabric include Unisync (UNI), RYU Apparel (RYU), Gildan Activewear (GIL), Canada Goose (GOOS), and Pollard Banknote (PBL). These companies are all part of the "consumer cyclical" sector.

How does iFabric compare to Unisync?

Unisync (TSE:UNI) and iFabric (TSE:IFA) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, risk, profitability and dividends.

Unisync has a beta of -0.287369, suggesting that its share price is 129% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, iFabric has a beta of -1.020774, suggesting that its share price is 202% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Unisync has a net margin of 2.18% compared to iFabric's net margin of -0.30%. Unisync's return on equity of 12.40% beat iFabric's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Unisync2.18% 12.40% -3.58%
iFabric -0.30%-0.47%1.61%

iFabric has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Unisync. iFabric is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Unisync, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
UnisyncC$84.04M0.51-C$4.57MC$0.1022.50
iFabricC$32.87M3.82C$361.54K-C$0.00N/A

2.2% of Unisync shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of iFabric shares are held by institutional investors. 36.7% of Unisync shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 66.4% of iFabric shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Unisync had 1 more articles in the media than iFabric. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Unisync and 0 mentions for iFabric. Unisync's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled iFabric'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Unisync Neutral
iFabric Neutral

Summary

Unisync beats iFabric on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does iFabric compare to RYU Apparel?

RYU Apparel (CVE:RYU) and iFabric (TSE:IFA) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, dividends and earnings.

iFabric has a net margin of -0.30% compared to RYU Apparel's net margin of -59.89%. RYU Apparel's return on equity of 0.00% beat iFabric's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
RYU Apparel-59.89% N/A -155.27%
iFabric -0.30%-0.47%1.61%

RYU Apparel has a beta of 0.47, meaning that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, iFabric has a beta of -1.020774, meaning that its stock price is 202% less volatile than the S&P 500.

0.1% of iFabric shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.9% of RYU Apparel shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 66.4% of iFabric shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, RYU Apparel's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled iFabric'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
RYU Apparel Neutral
iFabric Neutral

iFabric has higher revenue and earnings than RYU Apparel.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
RYU ApparelC$1.31M3.24N/AN/AN/A
iFabricC$32.87M3.82C$361.54K-C$0.00N/A

Summary

iFabric beats RYU Apparel on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does iFabric compare to Gildan Activewear?

Gildan Activewear (TSE:GIL) and iFabric (TSE:IFA) are both consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, dividends and earnings.

54.1% of Gildan Activewear shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of iFabric shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.3% of Gildan Activewear shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 66.4% of iFabric shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Gildan Activewear has higher revenue and earnings than iFabric. iFabric is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gildan Activewear, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gildan ActivewearC$4.07B3.70C$284.77MC$1.6948.14
iFabricC$32.87M3.82C$361.54K-C$0.00N/A

Gildan Activewear presently has a consensus price target of C$88.00, indicating a potential upside of 8.16%. Given Gildan Activewear's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Gildan Activewear is more favorable than iFabric.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gildan Activewear
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83
iFabric
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Gildan Activewear has a net margin of 6.14% compared to iFabric's net margin of -0.30%. Gildan Activewear's return on equity of 10.08% beat iFabric's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gildan Activewear6.14% 10.08% 9.32%
iFabric -0.30%-0.47%1.61%

Gildan Activewear has a beta of 1.567726, meaning that its stock price is 57% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, iFabric has a beta of -1.020774, meaning that its stock price is 202% less volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Gildan Activewear had 14 more articles in the media than iFabric. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Gildan Activewear and 0 mentions for iFabric. Gildan Activewear's average media sentiment score of 0.54 beat iFabric's score of 0.00 indicating that Gildan Activewear is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Gildan Activewear Positive
iFabric Neutral

Summary

Gildan Activewear beats iFabric on 15 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does iFabric compare to Canada Goose?

iFabric (TSE:IFA) and Canada Goose (TSE:GOOS) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and dividends.

0.1% of iFabric shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.7% of Canada Goose shares are owned by institutional investors. 66.4% of iFabric shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Canada Goose shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Canada Goose has higher revenue and earnings than iFabric. iFabric is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Canada Goose, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
iFabricC$32.87M3.82C$361.54K-C$0.00N/A
Canada GooseC$1.46B1.04C$72.96MC$0.2270.95

Canada Goose has a consensus price target of C$22.00, indicating a potential upside of 40.94%. Given Canada Goose's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Canada Goose is more favorable than iFabric.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
iFabric
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Canada Goose
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Canada Goose has a net margin of 1.47% compared to iFabric's net margin of -0.30%. Canada Goose's return on equity of 4.23% beat iFabric's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
iFabric-0.30% -0.47% 1.61%
Canada Goose 1.47%4.23%7.21%

iFabric has a beta of -1.020774, indicating that its share price is 202% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Canada Goose has a beta of 1.774402, indicating that its share price is 77% more volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Canada Goose had 2 more articles in the media than iFabric. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Canada Goose and 0 mentions for iFabric. Canada Goose's average media sentiment score of 0.55 beat iFabric's score of 0.00 indicating that Canada Goose is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
iFabric Neutral
Canada Goose Positive

Summary

Canada Goose beats iFabric on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does iFabric compare to Pollard Banknote?

iFabric (TSE:IFA) and Pollard Banknote (TSE:PBL) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and dividends.

Pollard Banknote has a net margin of 5.81% compared to iFabric's net margin of -0.30%. Pollard Banknote's return on equity of 9.56% beat iFabric's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
iFabric-0.30% -0.47% 1.61%
Pollard Banknote 5.81%9.56%1.67%

Pollard Banknote has a consensus price target of C$34.67, indicating a potential upside of 92.59%. Given Pollard Banknote's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Pollard Banknote is more favorable than iFabric.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
iFabric
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Pollard Banknote
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

0.1% of iFabric shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.6% of Pollard Banknote shares are owned by institutional investors. 66.4% of iFabric shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 64.0% of Pollard Banknote shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

iFabric has a beta of -1.020774, indicating that its share price is 202% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Pollard Banknote has a beta of 1.038829, indicating that its share price is 4% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Pollard Banknote has higher revenue and earnings than iFabric. iFabric is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pollard Banknote, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
iFabricC$32.87M3.82C$361.54K-C$0.00N/A
Pollard BanknoteC$596.02M0.82C$49.02MC$1.2614.29

In the previous week, Pollard Banknote's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat iFabric's score of 0.00 indicating that Pollard Banknote is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
iFabric Neutral
Pollard Banknote Positive

Summary

Pollard Banknote beats iFabric on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get iFabric News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for IFA and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding IFA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

IFA vs. The Competition

MetriciFabricApparel Manufacturing IndustryCyclical SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$125.44MC$2.75BC$3.91BC$11.72B
Dividend YieldN/A4.43%3.58%6.22%
P/E Ratio-1,380.0042.6270.0823.83
Price / Sales3.821.84328.6213.46
Price / Cash6.32337.8930.8782.69
Price / Book6.062.913.194.48
Net IncomeC$361.54KC$114.06MC$249.43MC$300.68M
7 Day Performance-4.83%-2.39%-0.27%0.12%
1 Month Performance27.38%8.63%1.62%2.88%
1 Year Performance331.25%57.56%4.03%57.78%

iFabric Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
IFA
iFabric
N/AC$4.14
+0.2%
N/AN/AC$125.44MC$32.87MN/AN/A
UNI
Unisync
N/AC$2.10
+1.4%
N/AN/AC$39.93MC$84.04M21.00303
RYU
RYU Apparel
N/AC$0.02
+33.3%
N/AN/AC$4.25MC$1.31MN/AN/A
GIL
Gildan Activewear
1.9318 of 5 stars
C$84.30
+9.5%
C$85.75
+1.7%
N/AC$15.61BC$3.62B32.3047,000
GOOS
Canada Goose
2.2162 of 5 stars
C$15.47
+1.6%
C$22.00
+42.2%
N/AC$1.50BC$1.46B70.324,462

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:IFA) was last updated on 5/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners