Which has preferable earnings and valuation, UNI or IFA?

iFabric has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Unisync. Unisync is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than iFabric, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Unisync C$88.17M 0.56 -C$4.57M C$0.21 12.38 iFabric C$53.30M 2.84 C$361.54K C$0.12 35.78

Is UNI or IFA more profitable?

iFabric has a net margin of 6.61% compared to Unisync's net margin of 4.45%. Unisync's return on equity of 24.94% beat iFabric's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Unisync 4.45% 24.94% -3.58% iFabric 6.61% 16.15% 1.61%

Which has better valuation and earnings, IFA or RYU?

iFabric has higher revenue and earnings than RYU Apparel. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio iFabric C$53.30M 2.84 C$361.54K C$0.12 35.78 RYU Apparel C$1.31M 3.24 N/A N/A N/A

Is IFA or RYU more profitable?

iFabric has a net margin of 6.61% compared to RYU Apparel's net margin of -59.89%. iFabric's return on equity of 16.15% beat RYU Apparel's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets iFabric 6.61% 16.15% 1.61% RYU Apparel -59.89% N/A -155.27%

Do analysts recommend GIL or IFA?

Gildan Activewear currently has a consensus price target of C$88.00, indicating a potential upside of 3.37%. Given Gildan Activewear's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Gildan Activewear is more favorable than iFabric. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Gildan Activewear 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.60 iFabric 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has higher earnings & valuation, GIL or IFA?

Gildan Activewear has higher revenue and earnings than iFabric. iFabric is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gildan Activewear, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Gildan Activewear C$4.07B 3.87 C$284.77M C$1.69 50.37 iFabric C$53.30M 2.84 C$361.54K C$0.12 35.78

Do analysts rate IFA or GOOS?

Canada Goose has a consensus price target of C$22.00, suggesting a potential upside of 55.81%. Given Canada Goose's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Canada Goose is more favorable than iFabric. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score iFabric 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Canada Goose 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, IFA or GOOS?

Canada Goose has higher revenue and earnings than iFabric. iFabric is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Canada Goose, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio iFabric C$53.30M 2.84 C$361.54K C$0.12 35.78 Canada Goose C$1.53B 0.90 C$72.96M C$0.23 61.39

Do analysts rate ACQ or IFA?

AutoCanada presently has a consensus price target of C$22.71, indicating a potential upside of 4.58%. Given AutoCanada's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe AutoCanada is more favorable than iFabric. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score AutoCanada 0 Sell rating(s) 5 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.29 iFabric 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, ACQ or IFA?

iFabric has lower revenue, but higher earnings than AutoCanada. AutoCanada is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than iFabric, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio AutoCanada C$4.85B 0.10 -C$50.70M C$1.04 20.88 iFabric C$53.30M 2.84 C$361.54K C$0.12 35.78

Is ACQ or IFA more profitable?

iFabric has a net margin of 6.61% compared to AutoCanada's net margin of 0.51%. iFabric's return on equity of 16.15% beat AutoCanada's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets AutoCanada 0.51% 5.29% 2.67% iFabric 6.61% 16.15% 1.61%

Does the media prefer ACQ or IFA?

In the previous week, AutoCanada had 1 more articles in the media than iFabric. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for AutoCanada and 3 mentions for iFabric. iFabric's average media sentiment score of 0.45 beat AutoCanada's score of -0.37 indicating that iFabric is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment AutoCanada 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 4 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral iFabric 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

iFabric (IFA) Competitors

C$4.15 0.00 (0.00%)

As of 06/12/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Compare

IFA vs. UNI, RYU, GIL, GOOS, and ACQ

Should you buy iFabric stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares iFabric with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with iFabric include Unisync (UNI), RYU Apparel (RYU), Gildan Activewear (GIL), Canada Goose (GOOS), and AutoCanada (ACQ). These companies are all part of the "consumer cyclical" sector.

How does iFabric compare to Unisync?

Unisync (TSE:UNI) and iFabric (TSE:IFA) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability and media sentiment.

iFabric has a net margin of 6.61% compared to Unisync's net margin of 4.45%. Unisync's return on equity of 24.94% beat iFabric's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Unisync	4.45%	24.94%	-3.58%
iFabric	6.61%	16.15%	1.61%

iFabric has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Unisync. Unisync is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than iFabric, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Unisync	C$88.17M	0.56	-C$4.57M	C$0.21	12.38
iFabric	C$53.30M	2.84	C$361.54K	C$0.12	35.78

In the previous week, iFabric had 3 more articles in the media than Unisync. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for iFabric and 0 mentions for Unisync. iFabric's average media sentiment score of 0.45 beat Unisync's score of 0.00 indicating that iFabric is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Unisync	Neutral
iFabric	Neutral

Unisync has a beta of -0.492692, meaning that its share price is 149% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, iFabric has a beta of -0.172068, meaning that its share price is 117% less volatile than the broader market.

2.2% of Unisync shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of iFabric shares are held by institutional investors. 36.7% of Unisync shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 66.4% of iFabric shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

iFabric beats Unisync on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does iFabric compare to RYU Apparel?

iFabric (TSE:IFA) and RYU Apparel (CVE:RYU) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation and dividends.

iFabric has a beta of -0.172068, indicating that its stock price is 117% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, RYU Apparel has a beta of 0.47, indicating that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the broader market.

0.1% of iFabric shares are held by institutional investors. 66.4% of iFabric shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 12.9% of RYU Apparel shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, iFabric had 3 more articles in the media than RYU Apparel. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for iFabric and 0 mentions for RYU Apparel. iFabric's average media sentiment score of 0.45 beat RYU Apparel's score of 0.00 indicating that iFabric is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
iFabric	Neutral
RYU Apparel	Neutral

iFabric has higher revenue and earnings than RYU Apparel.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
iFabric	C$53.30M	2.84	C$361.54K	C$0.12	35.78
RYU Apparel	C$1.31M	3.24	N/A	N/A	N/A

iFabric has a net margin of 6.61% compared to RYU Apparel's net margin of -59.89%. iFabric's return on equity of 16.15% beat RYU Apparel's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
iFabric	6.61%	16.15%	1.61%
RYU Apparel	-59.89%	N/A	-155.27%

Summary

iFabric beats RYU Apparel on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does iFabric compare to Gildan Activewear?

Gildan Activewear (TSE:GIL) and iFabric (TSE:IFA) are both consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends and media sentiment.

Gildan Activewear currently has a consensus price target of C$88.00, indicating a potential upside of 3.37%. Given Gildan Activewear's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Gildan Activewear is more favorable than iFabric.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Gildan Activewear	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.60
iFabric	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Gildan Activewear has higher revenue and earnings than iFabric. iFabric is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gildan Activewear, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Gildan Activewear	C$4.07B	3.87	C$284.77M	C$1.69	50.37
iFabric	C$53.30M	2.84	C$361.54K	C$0.12	35.78

In the previous week, iFabric had 3 more articles in the media than Gildan Activewear. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for iFabric and 0 mentions for Gildan Activewear. iFabric's average media sentiment score of 0.45 beat Gildan Activewear's score of 0.00 indicating that iFabric is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Gildan Activewear	Neutral
iFabric	Neutral

Gildan Activewear has a beta of 1.490118, suggesting that its share price is 49% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, iFabric has a beta of -0.172068, suggesting that its share price is 117% less volatile than the broader market.

53.9% of Gildan Activewear shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of iFabric shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.3% of Gildan Activewear shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 66.4% of iFabric shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

iFabric has a net margin of 6.61% compared to Gildan Activewear's net margin of 6.14%. iFabric's return on equity of 16.15% beat Gildan Activewear's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Gildan Activewear	6.14%	10.08%	9.32%
iFabric	6.61%	16.15%	1.61%

Summary

Gildan Activewear beats iFabric on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does iFabric compare to Canada Goose?

iFabric (TSE:IFA) and Canada Goose (TSE:GOOS) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

0.1% of iFabric shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.6% of Canada Goose shares are owned by institutional investors. 66.4% of iFabric shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Canada Goose shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Canada Goose has a consensus price target of C$22.00, suggesting a potential upside of 55.81%. Given Canada Goose's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Canada Goose is more favorable than iFabric.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
iFabric	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Canada Goose	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

iFabric has a beta of -0.172068, suggesting that its share price is 117% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Canada Goose has a beta of 1.756237, suggesting that its share price is 76% more volatile than the broader market.

iFabric has a net margin of 6.61% compared to Canada Goose's net margin of 1.47%. iFabric's return on equity of 16.15% beat Canada Goose's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
iFabric	6.61%	16.15%	1.61%
Canada Goose	1.47%	4.29%	7.21%

Canada Goose has higher revenue and earnings than iFabric. iFabric is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Canada Goose, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
iFabric	C$53.30M	2.84	C$361.54K	C$0.12	35.78
Canada Goose	C$1.53B	0.90	C$72.96M	C$0.23	61.39

In the previous week, iFabric had 3 more articles in the media than Canada Goose. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for iFabric and 0 mentions for Canada Goose. iFabric's average media sentiment score of 0.45 beat Canada Goose's score of 0.00 indicating that iFabric is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
iFabric	Neutral
Canada Goose	Neutral

Summary

Canada Goose beats iFabric on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does iFabric compare to AutoCanada?

AutoCanada (TSE:ACQ) and iFabric (TSE:IFA) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings and profitability.

AutoCanada has a beta of 1.768215, meaning that its share price is 77% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, iFabric has a beta of -0.172068, meaning that its share price is 117% less volatile than the broader market.

iFabric has a net margin of 6.61% compared to AutoCanada's net margin of 0.51%. iFabric's return on equity of 16.15% beat AutoCanada's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
AutoCanada	0.51%	5.29%	2.67%
iFabric	6.61%	16.15%	1.61%

40.4% of AutoCanada shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of iFabric shares are held by institutional investors. 4.9% of AutoCanada shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 66.4% of iFabric shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

AutoCanada presently has a consensus price target of C$22.71, indicating a potential upside of 4.58%. Given AutoCanada's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe AutoCanada is more favorable than iFabric.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
AutoCanada	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.29
iFabric	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

iFabric has lower revenue, but higher earnings than AutoCanada. AutoCanada is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than iFabric, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
AutoCanada	C$4.85B	0.10	-C$50.70M	C$1.04	20.88
iFabric	C$53.30M	2.84	C$361.54K	C$0.12	35.78

In the previous week, AutoCanada had 1 more articles in the media than iFabric. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for AutoCanada and 3 mentions for iFabric. iFabric's average media sentiment score of 0.45 beat AutoCanada's score of -0.37 indicating that iFabric is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
AutoCanada	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	4 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
iFabric	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

AutoCanada beats iFabric on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get iFabric News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding IFA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

IFA vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	iFabric	Apparel Manufacturing Industry	Cyclical Sector	TSE Exchange
Market Cap	C$151.54M	C$2.87B	C$3.99B	C$12.19B
Dividend Yield	N/A	3.35%	3.51%	6.19%
P/E Ratio	35.78	40.71	76.24	36.94
Price / Sales	2.84	1.73	324.16	10.45
Price / Cash	6.32	337.89	30.81	82.29
Price / Book	5.11	2.74	3.36	4.47
Net Income	C$361.54K	C$114.06M	C$249.12M	C$299.09M
7 Day Performance	1.22%	1.87%	0.71%	0.65%
1 Month Performance	6.68%	7.14%	1.40%	-0.08%
1 Year Performance	299.04%	55.08%	0.68%	41.90%

iFabric Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
IFA iFabric	N/A	C$4.15 flat	N/A	+299.0%	C$151.54M	C$53.30M	35.78	N/A
UNI Unisync	N/A	C$2.54 +0.8%	N/A	+98.5%	C$48.29M	C$88.17M	12.10	303
RYU RYU Apparel	N/A	C$0.02 +33.3%	N/A	+0.0%	C$4.25M	C$1.31M	N/A	N/A	Gap Up
GIL Gildan Activewear	1.2251 of 5 stars	C$80.37 -0.7%	C$88.00 +9.5%	+35.3%	C$14.88B	C$4.07B	47.56	47,000
GOOS Canada Goose	N/A	C$13.68 +0.1%	C$22.00 +60.8%	-5.7%	C$1.33B	C$1.53B	59.48	4,462

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:IFA) was last updated on 6/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

iFabric (IFA) Competitors