Free Trial
$100 Off Ends Tonight! MarketBeat All Access Returns to $249
  • 0Days
  • 0Hours
  • 0Minutes
  • 0Seconds
Save $100 Now
Claim MarketBeat All Access Sale Promotion

iFabric (IFA) Competitors

iFabric logo
C$4.37 +0.42 (+10.63%)
As of 03:59 PM Eastern

IFA vs. UNI, RYU, GIL, GOOS, and PZA

Should you buy iFabric stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares iFabric with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with iFabric include Unisync (UNI), RYU Apparel (RYU), Gildan Activewear (GIL), Canada Goose (GOOS), and Pizza Pizza Royalty (PZA). These companies are all part of the "consumer cyclical" sector.

How does iFabric compare to Unisync?

iFabric (TSE:IFA) and Unisync (TSE:UNI) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

0.1% of iFabric shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.2% of Unisync shares are held by institutional investors. 66.4% of iFabric shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 36.7% of Unisync shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

iFabric has a net margin of 6.61% compared to Unisync's net margin of 4.45%. Unisync's return on equity of 24.94% beat iFabric's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
iFabric6.61% 16.15% 1.61%
Unisync 4.45%24.94%-3.58%

In the previous week, iFabric had 1 more articles in the media than Unisync. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for iFabric and 0 mentions for Unisync. Unisync's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat iFabric's score of -0.59 indicating that Unisync is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
iFabric Negative
Unisync Neutral

iFabric has a beta of -0.767408, suggesting that its share price is 177% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Unisync has a beta of -0.287369, suggesting that its share price is 129% less volatile than the broader market.

iFabric has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Unisync. Unisync is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than iFabric, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
iFabricC$53.30M2.48C$361.54KC$0.1237.67
UnisyncC$88.17M0.57-C$4.57MC$0.2112.52

Summary

iFabric beats Unisync on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does iFabric compare to RYU Apparel?

iFabric (TSE:IFA) and RYU Apparel (CVE:RYU) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, profitability and media sentiment.

iFabric has a net margin of 6.61% compared to RYU Apparel's net margin of -59.89%. iFabric's return on equity of 16.15% beat RYU Apparel's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
iFabric6.61% 16.15% 1.61%
RYU Apparel -59.89%N/A -155.27%

iFabric has higher revenue and earnings than RYU Apparel.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
iFabricC$53.30M2.48C$361.54KC$0.1237.67
RYU ApparelC$1.31M3.24N/AN/AN/A

iFabric has a beta of -0.767408, suggesting that its stock price is 177% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, RYU Apparel has a beta of 0.47, suggesting that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, iFabric had 1 more articles in the media than RYU Apparel. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for iFabric and 0 mentions for RYU Apparel. RYU Apparel's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat iFabric's score of -0.59 indicating that RYU Apparel is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
iFabric Negative
RYU Apparel Neutral

0.1% of iFabric shares are held by institutional investors. 66.4% of iFabric shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 12.9% of RYU Apparel shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

iFabric beats RYU Apparel on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does iFabric compare to Gildan Activewear?

Gildan Activewear (TSE:GIL) and iFabric (TSE:IFA) are both consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and profitability.

In the previous week, iFabric had 1 more articles in the media than Gildan Activewear. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for iFabric and 0 mentions for Gildan Activewear. Gildan Activewear's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat iFabric's score of -0.59 indicating that Gildan Activewear is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Gildan Activewear Neutral
iFabric Negative

Gildan Activewear has a beta of 1.617626, suggesting that its share price is 62% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, iFabric has a beta of -0.767408, suggesting that its share price is 177% less volatile than the broader market.

Gildan Activewear has higher revenue and earnings than iFabric. iFabric is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gildan Activewear, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gildan ActivewearC$4.07B3.75C$284.77MC$1.6948.76
iFabricC$53.30M2.48C$361.54KC$0.1237.67

54.2% of Gildan Activewear shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of iFabric shares are held by institutional investors. 2.3% of Gildan Activewear shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 66.4% of iFabric shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Gildan Activewear currently has a consensus price target of C$88.00, suggesting a potential upside of 6.78%. Given Gildan Activewear's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Gildan Activewear is more favorable than iFabric.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gildan Activewear
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83
iFabric
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

iFabric has a net margin of 6.61% compared to Gildan Activewear's net margin of 6.14%. iFabric's return on equity of 16.15% beat Gildan Activewear's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gildan Activewear6.14% 10.08% 9.32%
iFabric 6.61%16.15%1.61%

Summary

Gildan Activewear beats iFabric on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does iFabric compare to Canada Goose?

iFabric (TSE:IFA) and Canada Goose (TSE:GOOS) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, valuation, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Canada Goose has higher revenue and earnings than iFabric. iFabric is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Canada Goose, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
iFabricC$53.30M2.48C$361.54KC$0.1237.67
Canada GooseC$1.53B0.87C$72.96MC$0.2359.70

Canada Goose has a consensus target price of C$22.00, suggesting a potential upside of 60.23%. Given Canada Goose's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Canada Goose is more favorable than iFabric.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
iFabric
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Canada Goose
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

iFabric has a beta of -0.767408, suggesting that its share price is 177% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Canada Goose has a beta of 1.880912, suggesting that its share price is 88% more volatile than the broader market.

0.1% of iFabric shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.6% of Canada Goose shares are held by institutional investors. 66.4% of iFabric shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Canada Goose shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

iFabric has a net margin of 6.61% compared to Canada Goose's net margin of 1.47%. iFabric's return on equity of 16.15% beat Canada Goose's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
iFabric6.61% 16.15% 1.61%
Canada Goose 1.47%4.29%7.21%

In the previous week, iFabric and iFabric both had 1 articles in the media. Canada Goose's average media sentiment score of -0.34 beat iFabric's score of -0.59 indicating that Canada Goose is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
iFabric
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative
Canada Goose
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Canada Goose beats iFabric on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does iFabric compare to Pizza Pizza Royalty?

Pizza Pizza Royalty (TSE:PZA) and iFabric (TSE:IFA) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, earnings, dividends and media sentiment.

14.3% of Pizza Pizza Royalty shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of iFabric shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Pizza Pizza Royalty shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 66.4% of iFabric shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Pizza Pizza Royalty has a beta of 0.513748, suggesting that its share price is 49% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, iFabric has a beta of -0.767408, suggesting that its share price is 177% less volatile than the broader market.

Pizza Pizza Royalty presently has a consensus price target of C$14.00, suggesting a potential upside of 8.61%. Given Pizza Pizza Royalty's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Pizza Pizza Royalty is more favorable than iFabric.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pizza Pizza Royalty
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
iFabric
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Pizza Pizza Royalty has a net margin of 29.35% compared to iFabric's net margin of 6.61%. iFabric's return on equity of 16.15% beat Pizza Pizza Royalty's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pizza Pizza Royalty29.35% 10.21% 6.68%
iFabric 6.61%16.15%1.61%

In the previous week, Pizza Pizza Royalty had 1 more articles in the media than iFabric. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Pizza Pizza Royalty and 1 mentions for iFabric. iFabric's average media sentiment score of -0.59 beat Pizza Pizza Royalty's score of -1.00 indicating that iFabric is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Pizza Pizza Royalty
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative
iFabric
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative

Pizza Pizza Royalty has higher earnings, but lower revenue than iFabric. Pizza Pizza Royalty is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than iFabric, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pizza Pizza RoyaltyC$40.13M10.86C$23.30MC$0.9513.60
iFabricC$53.30M2.48C$361.54KC$0.1237.67

Summary

Pizza Pizza Royalty beats iFabric on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get iFabric News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for IFA and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding IFA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

IFA vs. The Competition

MetriciFabricApparel Manufacturing IndustryCyclical SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$132.41MC$2.75BC$3.94BC$12.16B
Dividend YieldN/A3.39%3.55%6.20%
P/E Ratio37.6740.8177.7237.64
Price / Sales2.481.64326.2011.68
Price / Cash6.32337.8930.8782.29
Price / Book5.382.733.234.50
Net IncomeC$361.54KC$114.06MC$247.50MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance12.34%4.28%0.39%1.38%
1 Month Performance-1.13%-1.63%0.63%1.46%
1 Year Performance341.41%51.95%2.30%55.45%

iFabric Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
IFA
iFabric
N/AC$4.37
+10.6%
N/A+299.0%C$132.41MC$53.30M37.67N/A
UNI
Unisync
N/AC$2.62
+0.4%
N/A+89.7%C$49.81MC$84.04M26.20303
RYU
RYU Apparel
N/AC$0.02
+33.3%
N/A+0.0%C$4.25MC$1.31MN/AN/A
GIL
Gildan Activewear
1.9964 of 5 stars
C$78.40
+0.8%
C$88.00
+12.2%
+19.4%C$14.52BC$4.07B46.3947,000
GOOS
Canada Goose
2.4676 of 5 stars
C$13.57
-7.2%
C$22.00
+62.1%
-16.4%C$1.32BC$1.46B61.684,462

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:IFA) was last updated on 5/25/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners