Go Pro

iFabric (IFA) Competitors

iFabric logo
C$4.70 +0.04 (+0.86%)
As of 12:20 PM Eastern

IFA vs. UNI, GIII, LLL, SKX, and GIL

Should you buy iFabric stock or one of its competitors? iFabric's main competitors and comparable companies include Unisync (UNI), ReGen III (GIII), lululemon athletica (LLL), Striker Exploration (SKX), and Gildan Activewear (GIL). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "apparel, accessories & luxury goods" industry.

How does iFabric compare to Unisync?

iFabric (TSE:IFA) and Unisync (TSE:UNI) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership and earnings.

iFabric has a beta of -0.215198, indicating that its stock price is 122% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Unisync has a beta of -0.342185, indicating that its stock price is 134% less volatile than the broader market.

iFabric has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Unisync. Unisync is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than iFabric, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
iFabricC$53.30M3.22C$361.54KC$0.1240.52
UnisyncC$88.17M0.53-C$4.57MC$0.2111.67

3.0% of iFabric shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.2% of Unisync shares are owned by institutional investors. 66.4% of iFabric shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 36.7% of Unisync shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

iFabric has a net margin of 6.61% compared to Unisync's net margin of 4.45%. Unisync's return on equity of 24.94% beat iFabric's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
iFabric6.61% 16.15% 1.61%
Unisync 4.45%24.94%-3.58%

In the previous week, Unisync had 1 more articles in the media than iFabric. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Unisync and 1 mentions for iFabric. Unisync's average media sentiment score of 1.42 beat iFabric's score of 1.38 indicating that Unisync is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
iFabric Positive
Unisync Positive

Summary

iFabric beats Unisync on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does iFabric compare to ReGen III?

iFabric (TSE:IFA) and ReGen III (CVE:GIII) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends and profitability.

iFabric has a net margin of 6.61% compared to ReGen III's net margin of 0.00%. ReGen III's return on equity of 87.96% beat iFabric's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
iFabric6.61% 16.15% 1.61%
ReGen III N/A 87.96%-224.56%

iFabric has a beta of -0.215198, meaning that its share price is 122% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ReGen III has a beta of 0.507118, meaning that its share price is 49% less volatile than the broader market.

iFabric has higher revenue and earnings than ReGen III. ReGen III is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than iFabric, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
iFabricC$53.30M3.22C$361.54KC$0.1240.52
ReGen IIIN/AN/A-C$5.75M-C$0.03N/A

3.0% of iFabric shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.2% of ReGen III shares are owned by institutional investors. 66.4% of iFabric shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 19.8% of ReGen III shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, iFabric had 1 more articles in the media than ReGen III. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for iFabric and 0 mentions for ReGen III. iFabric's average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat ReGen III's score of 0.00 indicating that iFabric is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
iFabric Positive
ReGen III Neutral

Summary

iFabric beats ReGen III on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does iFabric compare to lululemon athletica?

iFabric (TSE:IFA) and lululemon athletica (TSE:LLL) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

In the previous week, iFabric had 1 more articles in the media than lululemon athletica. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for iFabric and 0 mentions for lululemon athletica. iFabric's average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat lululemon athletica's score of 0.00 indicating that iFabric is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
iFabric Positive
lululemon athletica Neutral

3.0% of iFabric shares are held by institutional investors. 66.4% of iFabric shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

iFabric has a net margin of 6.61% compared to lululemon athletica's net margin of 0.00%. iFabric's return on equity of 16.15% beat lululemon athletica's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
iFabric6.61% 16.15% 1.61%
lululemon athletica N/A N/A N/A

iFabric has higher revenue and earnings than lululemon athletica.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
iFabricC$53.30M3.22C$361.54KC$0.1240.52
lululemon athleticaN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Summary

iFabric beats lululemon athletica on 8 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does iFabric compare to Striker Exploration?

iFabric (TSE:IFA) and Striker Exploration (CVE:SKX) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends and valuation.

iFabric has higher revenue and earnings than Striker Exploration.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
iFabricC$53.30M3.22C$361.54KC$0.1240.52
Striker ExplorationN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

3.0% of iFabric shares are held by institutional investors. 66.4% of iFabric shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

iFabric has a net margin of 6.61% compared to Striker Exploration's net margin of 0.00%. iFabric's return on equity of 16.15% beat Striker Exploration's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
iFabric6.61% 16.15% 1.61%
Striker Exploration N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, iFabric had 1 more articles in the media than Striker Exploration. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for iFabric and 0 mentions for Striker Exploration. iFabric's average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat Striker Exploration's score of 0.00 indicating that iFabric is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
iFabric Positive
Striker Exploration Neutral

Summary

iFabric beats Striker Exploration on 8 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does iFabric compare to Gildan Activewear?

iFabric (TSE:IFA) and Gildan Activewear (TSE:GIL) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk and institutional ownership.

3.0% of iFabric shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 56.1% of Gildan Activewear shares are owned by institutional investors. 66.4% of iFabric shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.3% of Gildan Activewear shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

iFabric has a beta of -0.215198, suggesting that its stock price is 122% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gildan Activewear has a beta of 1.511254, suggesting that its stock price is 51% more volatile than the broader market.

Gildan Activewear has a consensus price target of C$89.50, suggesting a potential upside of 13.48%. Given Gildan Activewear's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Gildan Activewear is more favorable than iFabric.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
iFabric
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Gildan Activewear
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75

In the previous week, iFabric and iFabric both had 1 articles in the media. iFabric's average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat Gildan Activewear's score of 0.86 indicating that iFabric is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
iFabric Positive
Gildan Activewear Positive

iFabric has a net margin of 6.61% compared to Gildan Activewear's net margin of 1.33%. iFabric's return on equity of 16.15% beat Gildan Activewear's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
iFabric6.61% 16.15% 1.61%
Gildan Activewear 1.33%2.12%9.32%

Gildan Activewear has higher revenue and earnings than iFabric. iFabric is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gildan Activewear, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
iFabricC$53.30M3.22C$361.54KC$0.1240.52
Gildan ActivewearC$4.74B3.08C$284.77MC$0.51154.65

Summary

Gildan Activewear beats iFabric on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get iFabric News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for IFA and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

IFA vs. The Competition

MetriciFabricTextiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods IndustryConsumer Discretionary SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$171.63MC$11.65BC$13.14BC$12.53B
Dividend YieldN/A2.72%55.50%6.20%
P/E Ratio40.5225.2846.6630.69
Price / Sales3.2210.0791.419.75
Price / Cash6.32154.5226.3382.29
Price / Book5.793.774.514.63
Net IncomeC$361.54KC$452.96MC$443.58MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-2.69%-1.76%-0.33%0.75%
1 Month Performance-1.88%-0.32%2.04%3.71%
1 Year Performance394.74%22.34%0.70%35.85%

iFabric Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
IFA
iFabric
N/AC$4.70
+0.9%
N/A+412.1%C$171.63MC$53.30M40.52N/A
UNI
Unisync
N/AC$2.36
-1.7%
N/A+81.8%C$44.87MC$88.17M11.24303
GIII
ReGen III
N/AC$0.17
flat
N/A-26.1%C$26.30MN/AN/A3,600
LLL
lululemon athletica
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$0.00N/AN/A244
SKX
Striker Exploration
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$0.00N/AN/A15,100

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:IFA) was last updated on 8/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners