Which has better valuation & earnings, UNI or IFA?

iFabric has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Unisync. Unisync is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than iFabric, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Unisync C$89.94M 0.54 -C$4.57M C$0.21 12.10 iFabric C$57.09M 2.67 C$361.54K C$0.12 33.71

Is UNI or IFA more profitable?

iFabric has a net margin of 6.92% compared to Unisync's net margin of 4.38%. Unisync's return on equity of 23.49% beat iFabric's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Unisync 4.38% 23.49% -3.58% iFabric 6.92% 13.95% 1.61%

Which has better valuation & earnings, GIII or IFA?

iFabric has higher revenue and earnings than ReGen III. ReGen III is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than iFabric, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio ReGen III N/A N/A -C$5.75M -C$0.03 N/A iFabric C$57.09M 2.67 C$361.54K C$0.12 33.71

Is GIII or IFA more profitable?

iFabric has a net margin of 6.92% compared to ReGen III's net margin of 0.00%. ReGen III's return on equity of 105.50% beat iFabric's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets ReGen III N/A 105.50% -224.56% iFabric 6.92% 13.95% 1.61%

Which has higher earnings & valuation, LLL or IFA?

iFabric has higher revenue and earnings than lululemon athletica. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio lululemon athletica N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A iFabric C$57.09M 2.67 C$361.54K C$0.12 33.71

Which has better earnings & valuation, SKX or IFA?

iFabric has higher revenue and earnings than Striker Exploration. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Striker Exploration N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A iFabric C$57.09M 2.67 C$361.54K C$0.12 33.71

Do analysts rate GIL or IFA?

Gildan Activewear currently has a consensus price target of C$89.50, suggesting a potential upside of 50.57%. Given Gildan Activewear's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Gildan Activewear is more favorable than iFabric. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Gildan Activewear 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.75 iFabric 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has higher earnings & valuation, GIL or IFA?

Gildan Activewear has higher revenue and earnings than iFabric. iFabric is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gildan Activewear, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Gildan Activewear C$4.74B 2.32 C$284.77M C$0.51 116.55 iFabric C$57.09M 2.67 C$361.54K C$0.12 33.71

iFabric (IFA) Competitors

C$4.18 +0.04 (+0.97%)

As of 10/13/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Compare

IFA vs. UNI, GIII, LLL, SKX, and GIL

Should you buy iFabric stock or one of its competitors? iFabric's main competitors and comparable companies include Unisync (UNI), ReGen III (GIII), lululemon athletica (LLL), Striker Exploration (SKX), and Gildan Activewear (GIL). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "apparel, accessories & luxury goods" industry.

How does iFabric compare to Unisync?

Unisync (TSE:UNI) and iFabric (TSE:IFA) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations and earnings.

2.2% of Unisync shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.4% of iFabric shares are held by institutional investors. 36.7% of Unisync shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 66.4% of iFabric shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Unisync's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled iFabric'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Unisync	Neutral
iFabric	Neutral

iFabric has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Unisync. Unisync is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than iFabric, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Unisync	C$89.94M	0.54	-C$4.57M	C$0.21	12.10
iFabric	C$57.09M	2.67	C$361.54K	C$0.12	33.71

iFabric has a net margin of 6.92% compared to Unisync's net margin of 4.38%. Unisync's return on equity of 23.49% beat iFabric's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Unisync	4.38%	23.49%	-3.58%
iFabric	6.92%	13.95%	1.61%

Unisync has a beta of -0.354979, meaning that its stock price is 135% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, iFabric has a beta of -0.746828, meaning that its stock price is 175% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

iFabric beats Unisync on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does iFabric compare to ReGen III?

ReGen III (CVE:GIII) and iFabric (TSE:IFA) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations and earnings.

iFabric has a net margin of 6.92% compared to ReGen III's net margin of 0.00%. ReGen III's return on equity of 105.50% beat iFabric's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
ReGen III	N/A	105.50%	-224.56%
iFabric	6.92%	13.95%	1.61%

ReGen III has a beta of 0.875436, meaning that its stock price is 12% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, iFabric has a beta of -0.746828, meaning that its stock price is 175% less volatile than the broader market.

0.2% of ReGen III shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.4% of iFabric shares are held by institutional investors. 19.8% of ReGen III shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 66.4% of iFabric shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, ReGen III's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled iFabric'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
ReGen III	Neutral
iFabric	Neutral

iFabric has higher revenue and earnings than ReGen III. ReGen III is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than iFabric, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
ReGen III	N/A	N/A	-C$5.75M	-C$0.03	N/A
iFabric	C$57.09M	2.67	C$361.54K	C$0.12	33.71

Summary

iFabric beats ReGen III on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does iFabric compare to lululemon athletica?

lululemon athletica (TSE:LLL) and iFabric (TSE:IFA) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, dividends, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership and valuation.

iFabric has higher revenue and earnings than lululemon athletica.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
lululemon athletica	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
iFabric	C$57.09M	2.67	C$361.54K	C$0.12	33.71

In the previous week, lululemon athletica's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled iFabric'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
lululemon athletica	Neutral
iFabric	Neutral

iFabric has a net margin of 6.92% compared to lululemon athletica's net margin of 0.00%. iFabric's return on equity of 13.95% beat lululemon athletica's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
lululemon athletica	N/A	N/A	N/A
iFabric	6.92%	13.95%	1.61%

2.4% of iFabric shares are owned by institutional investors. 66.4% of iFabric shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

iFabric beats lululemon athletica on 6 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does iFabric compare to Striker Exploration?

Striker Exploration (CVE:SKX) and iFabric (TSE:IFA) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment and dividends.

2.4% of iFabric shares are held by institutional investors. 66.4% of iFabric shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

iFabric has higher revenue and earnings than Striker Exploration.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Striker Exploration	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
iFabric	C$57.09M	2.67	C$361.54K	C$0.12	33.71

iFabric has a net margin of 6.92% compared to Striker Exploration's net margin of 0.00%. iFabric's return on equity of 13.95% beat Striker Exploration's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Striker Exploration	N/A	N/A	N/A
iFabric	6.92%	13.95%	1.61%

In the previous week, Striker Exploration's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled iFabric'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Striker Exploration	Neutral
iFabric	Neutral

Summary

iFabric beats Striker Exploration on 6 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does iFabric compare to Gildan Activewear?

Gildan Activewear (TSE:GIL) and iFabric (TSE:IFA) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends and risk.

iFabric has a net margin of 6.92% compared to Gildan Activewear's net margin of 1.33%. iFabric's return on equity of 13.95% beat Gildan Activewear's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Gildan Activewear	1.33%	2.12%	9.32%
iFabric	6.92%	13.95%	1.61%

Gildan Activewear has higher revenue and earnings than iFabric. iFabric is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gildan Activewear, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Gildan Activewear	C$4.74B	2.32	C$284.77M	C$0.51	116.55
iFabric	C$57.09M	2.67	C$361.54K	C$0.12	33.71

Gildan Activewear has a beta of 1.630468, suggesting that its stock price is 63% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, iFabric has a beta of -0.746828, suggesting that its stock price is 175% less volatile than the broader market.

56.7% of Gildan Activewear shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.4% of iFabric shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.3% of Gildan Activewear shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 66.4% of iFabric shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Gildan Activewear had 4 more articles in the media than iFabric. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Gildan Activewear and 0 mentions for iFabric. Gildan Activewear's average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat iFabric's score of 0.00 indicating that Gildan Activewear is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Gildan Activewear	Neutral
iFabric	Neutral

Gildan Activewear currently has a consensus price target of C$89.50, suggesting a potential upside of 50.57%. Given Gildan Activewear's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Gildan Activewear is more favorable than iFabric.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Gildan Activewear	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
iFabric	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Summary

Gildan Activewear beats iFabric on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get iFabric News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

IFA vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	iFabric	Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry	Consumer Discretionary Sector	TSE Exchange
Market Cap	C$152.64M	C$9.77B	C$12.52B	C$12.72B
Dividend Yield	N/A	2.70%	87.68%	6.34%
P/E Ratio	33.71	21.11	41.99	38.35
Price / Sales	2.67	9.37	85.58	8.68
Price / Cash	6.32	188.00	31.65	82.29
Price / Book	2.87	3.83	3.98	4.44
Net Income	C$361.54K	C$462.50M	C$443.94M	C$299.09M
7 Day Performance	5.82%	0.72%	0.15%	0.69%
1 Month Performance	8.29%	1.06%	-2.54%	-1.38%
1 Year Performance	251.26%	7.16%	-5.29%	15.18%

iFabric Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
IFA iFabric	N/A	C$4.18 +1.0%	N/A	+251.3%	C$152.64M	C$57.09M	33.71	33	Gap Down
UNI Unisync	N/A	C$2.50 -2.7%	N/A	+100.0%	C$47.53M	C$89.94M	11.90	303	Gap Down
GIII ReGen III	N/A	C$0.18 +6.1%	N/A	-19.4%	C$27.08M	N/A	N/A	3,600	Gap Up
LLL lululemon athletica	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	C$0.00	N/A	N/A	244	Gap Up
SKX Striker Exploration	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	C$0.00	N/A	N/A	15,100

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:IFA) was last updated on 10/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

iFabric (IFA) Competitors

IFA vs. UNI, GIII, LLL, SKX, and GIL

How does iFabric compare to Unisync?

Summary

How does iFabric compare to ReGen III?

Summary

How does iFabric compare to lululemon athletica?

Summary

How does iFabric compare to Striker Exploration?

Summary

How does iFabric compare to Gildan Activewear?

Summary

Media Sentiment Over Time

IFA vs. The Competition

iFabric Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

iFabric (IFA) Competitors

IFA vs. UNI, GIII, LLL, SKX, and GIL

How does iFabric compare to Unisync?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in UNI or IFA?

Does the media refer more to UNI or IFA?

Which has better valuation & earnings, UNI or IFA?

Is UNI or IFA more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, UNI or IFA?

Summary

How does iFabric compare to ReGen III?

Is GIII or IFA more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, GIII or IFA?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in GIII or IFA?

Does the media refer more to GIII or IFA?

Which has better valuation & earnings, GIII or IFA?

Summary

How does iFabric compare to lululemon athletica?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, LLL or IFA?

Does the media favor LLL or IFA?

Is LLL or IFA more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in LLL or IFA?

Summary

How does iFabric compare to Striker Exploration?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of SKX or IFA?

Which has better earnings & valuation, SKX or IFA?

Is SKX or IFA more profitable?

Does the media refer more to SKX or IFA?

Summary

How does iFabric compare to Gildan Activewear?

Is GIL or IFA more profitable?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, GIL or IFA?

Which has more volatility & risk, GIL or IFA?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of GIL or IFA?

Does the media favor GIL or IFA?

Do analysts rate GIL or IFA?

Summary

Media Sentiment Over Time

IFA vs. The Competition

iFabric Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools