Do analysts rate HTG or CNEL?

Hunting presently has a consensus price target of GBX 512.50, indicating a potential upside of 25.46%. Given Hunting's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Hunting is more favorable than China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L). Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Hunting 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.75 China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L) 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Do analysts prefer HTG or PFC?

Hunting presently has a consensus target price of GBX 512.50, indicating a potential upside of 25.46%. Given Hunting's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Hunting is more favorable than Petrofac. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Hunting 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.75 Petrofac 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, HTG or PFC?

Hunting has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Petrofac. Petrofac is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hunting, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Hunting £987.20M 0.60 £154.42M £24.60 16.61 Petrofac £3.30B 0.00 -£714.53M -£81.55 N/A

Is HTG or PFC more profitable?

Hunting has a net margin of 3.56% compared to Petrofac's net margin of -20.23%. Petrofac's return on equity of 371.32% beat Hunting's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Hunting 3.56% 5.11% 4.21% Petrofac -20.23% 371.32% -9.55%

Do analysts prefer HTG or TAND?

Hunting presently has a consensus price target of GBX 512.50, indicating a potential upside of 25.46%. Given Hunting's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Hunting is more favorable than Tan Delta Systems. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Hunting 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.75 Tan Delta Systems 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has higher valuation & earnings, HTG or TAND?

Hunting has higher revenue and earnings than Tan Delta Systems. Tan Delta Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hunting, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Hunting £987.20M 0.60 £154.42M £24.60 16.61 Tan Delta Systems £1.22M 17.97 -£1.33M -£2.00 N/A

Do analysts recommend PRES or HTG?

Hunting has a consensus price target of GBX 512.50, indicating a potential upside of 25.46%. Given Hunting's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Hunting is more favorable than Pressure Technologies. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Pressure Technologies 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Hunting 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.75

Which has higher valuation and earnings, PRES or HTG?

Hunting has higher revenue and earnings than Pressure Technologies. Pressure Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hunting, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Pressure Technologies £32.78M 0.00 -£500.34K -£1.35 N/A Hunting £987.20M 0.60 £154.42M £24.60 16.61

Do analysts recommend HTG or POS?

Hunting presently has a consensus price target of GBX 512.50, suggesting a potential upside of 25.46%. Given Hunting's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Hunting is more favorable than Plexus. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Hunting 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.75 Plexus 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has better valuation & earnings, HTG or POS?

Hunting has higher revenue and earnings than Plexus. Plexus is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hunting, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Hunting £987.20M 0.60 £154.42M £24.60 16.61 Plexus £2.81M 2.23 £2.93M -£2.68 N/A

Is HTG or POS more profitable?

Hunting has a net margin of 3.56% compared to Plexus' net margin of -145.30%. Hunting's return on equity of 5.11% beat Plexus' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Hunting 3.56% 5.11% 4.21% Plexus -145.30% -27.03% 0.01%

Does the media favor HTG or POS?

In the previous week, Hunting had 10 more articles in the media than Plexus. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Hunting and 1 mentions for Plexus. Hunting's average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat Plexus' score of 0.00 indicating that Hunting is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Hunting 3 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Plexus 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Hunting (HTG) Competitors

GBX 408.50 -4.50 (-1.09%)

As of 08/28/2026 12:03 PM Eastern

Compare

HTG vs. CNEL, PFC, TAND, PRES, and POS

Should you buy Hunting stock or one of its competitors? Hunting's main competitors and comparable companies include China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L) (CNEL), Petrofac (PFC), Tan Delta Systems (TAND), Pressure Technologies (PRES), and Plexus (POS). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "oil & gas equipment & services" industry.

How does Hunting compare to China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L)?

Hunting (LON:HTG) and China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L) (LON:CNEL) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability and earnings.

Hunting presently has a consensus price target of GBX 512.50, indicating a potential upside of 25.46%. Given Hunting's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Hunting is more favorable than China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L).

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Hunting	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L)	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Hunting has higher revenue and earnings than China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L). China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hunting, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Hunting	£987.20M	0.60	£154.42M	£24.60	16.61
China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L)	N/A	N/A	N/A	-£97.90	N/A

In the previous week, Hunting had 11 more articles in the media than China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L). MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Hunting and 0 mentions for China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L). Hunting's average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L)'s score of 0.55 indicating that Hunting is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Hunting	Positive
China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L)	Positive

61.4% of Hunting shares are held by institutional investors. 3.7% of Hunting shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Hunting has a net margin of 3.56% compared to China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L)'s net margin of 0.00%. Hunting's return on equity of 5.11% beat China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L)'s return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Hunting	3.56%	5.11%	4.21%
China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L)	N/A	N/A	N/A

Summary

Hunting beats China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L) on 13 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hunting compare to Petrofac?

Hunting (LON:HTG) and Petrofac (LON:PFC) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Hunting has a net margin of 3.56% compared to Petrofac's net margin of -20.23%. Petrofac's return on equity of 371.32% beat Hunting's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Hunting	3.56%	5.11%	4.21%
Petrofac	-20.23%	371.32%	-9.55%

Hunting presently has a consensus target price of GBX 512.50, indicating a potential upside of 25.46%. Given Hunting's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Hunting is more favorable than Petrofac.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Hunting	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
Petrofac	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

In the previous week, Hunting had 11 more articles in the media than Petrofac. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Hunting and 0 mentions for Petrofac. Hunting's average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat Petrofac's score of 0.00 indicating that Hunting is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Hunting	Positive
Petrofac	Neutral

61.4% of Hunting shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.4% of Petrofac shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.7% of Hunting shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 16.5% of Petrofac shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Hunting has a beta of 0.666, suggesting that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Petrofac has a beta of 0.97, suggesting that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the broader market.

Hunting pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Petrofac pays an annual dividend of GBX 30 per share. Hunting pays out 49.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Petrofac pays out -36.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Hunting has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Petrofac. Petrofac is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hunting, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Hunting	£987.20M	0.60	£154.42M	£24.60	16.61
Petrofac	£3.30B	0.00	-£714.53M	-£81.55	N/A

Summary

Hunting beats Petrofac on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hunting compare to Tan Delta Systems?

Hunting (LON:HTG) and Tan Delta Systems (LON:TAND) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation and media sentiment.

Hunting has a net margin of 3.56% compared to Tan Delta Systems' net margin of -129.22%. Hunting's return on equity of 5.11% beat Tan Delta Systems' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Hunting	3.56%	5.11%	4.21%
Tan Delta Systems	-129.22%	-60.04%	N/A

61.4% of Hunting shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.6% of Tan Delta Systems shares are held by institutional investors. 3.7% of Hunting shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 19.4% of Tan Delta Systems shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Hunting has a beta of 0.666, suggesting that its share price is 33% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tan Delta Systems has a beta of 0.597, suggesting that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market.

Hunting has higher revenue and earnings than Tan Delta Systems. Tan Delta Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hunting, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Hunting	£987.20M	0.60	£154.42M	£24.60	16.61
Tan Delta Systems	£1.22M	17.97	-£1.33M	-£2.00	N/A

In the previous week, Hunting had 11 more articles in the media than Tan Delta Systems. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Hunting and 0 mentions for Tan Delta Systems. Hunting's average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat Tan Delta Systems' score of 0.00 indicating that Hunting is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Hunting	Positive
Tan Delta Systems	Neutral

Hunting presently has a consensus price target of GBX 512.50, indicating a potential upside of 25.46%. Given Hunting's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Hunting is more favorable than Tan Delta Systems.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Hunting	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
Tan Delta Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Summary

Hunting beats Tan Delta Systems on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hunting compare to Pressure Technologies?

Pressure Technologies (LON:PRES) and Hunting (LON:HTG) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Hunting has a consensus price target of GBX 512.50, indicating a potential upside of 25.46%. Given Hunting's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Hunting is more favorable than Pressure Technologies.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Pressure Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Hunting	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

Hunting has higher revenue and earnings than Pressure Technologies. Pressure Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hunting, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Pressure Technologies	£32.78M	0.00	-£500.34K	-£1.35	N/A
Hunting	£987.20M	0.60	£154.42M	£24.60	16.61

In the previous week, Hunting had 11 more articles in the media than Pressure Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Hunting and 0 mentions for Pressure Technologies. Hunting's average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat Pressure Technologies' score of 0.00 indicating that Hunting is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Pressure Technologies	Neutral
Hunting	Positive

Pressure Technologies pays an annual dividend of GBX 8 per share. Hunting pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Pressure Technologies pays out -593.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hunting pays out 49.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Pressure Technologies has a beta of 1.58, meaning that its share price is 58% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hunting has a beta of 0.666, meaning that its share price is 33% less volatile than the broader market.

Hunting has a net margin of 3.56% compared to Pressure Technologies' net margin of -16.44%. Hunting's return on equity of 5.11% beat Pressure Technologies' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Pressure Technologies	-16.44%	-19.70%	0.88%
Hunting	3.56%	5.11%	4.21%

65.9% of Pressure Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.4% of Hunting shares are held by institutional investors. 5.4% of Pressure Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.7% of Hunting shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Hunting beats Pressure Technologies on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hunting compare to Plexus?

Hunting (LON:HTG) and Plexus (LON:POS) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, media sentiment and profitability.

Hunting presently has a consensus price target of GBX 512.50, suggesting a potential upside of 25.46%. Given Hunting's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Hunting is more favorable than Plexus.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Hunting	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
Plexus	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Hunting has a net margin of 3.56% compared to Plexus' net margin of -145.30%. Hunting's return on equity of 5.11% beat Plexus' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Hunting	3.56%	5.11%	4.21%
Plexus	-145.30%	-27.03%	0.01%

61.4% of Hunting shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.6% of Plexus shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.7% of Hunting shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 84.7% of Plexus shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Hunting had 10 more articles in the media than Plexus. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Hunting and 1 mentions for Plexus. Hunting's average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat Plexus' score of 0.00 indicating that Hunting is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Hunting	3 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Plexus	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Hunting has a beta of 0.666, indicating that its share price is 33% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Plexus has a beta of 0.601, indicating that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market.

Hunting has higher revenue and earnings than Plexus. Plexus is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hunting, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Hunting	£987.20M	0.60	£154.42M	£24.60	16.61
Plexus	£2.81M	2.23	£2.93M	-£2.68	N/A

Summary

Hunting beats Plexus on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Hunting News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

HTG vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Hunting	Energy Equipment & Services Industry	Energy Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£600.35M	£3.74B	£9.84B	£2.92B
Dividend Yield	2.49%	13.38%	11.47%	6.17%
P/E Ratio	16.61	43.79	20.15	367.33
Price / Sales	0.60	32.87	453.19	83,334.32
Price / Cash	5.56	21.19	36.18	27.89
Price / Book	0.71	2.21	3.07	6.99
Net Income	£154.42M	£67.81M	£4.33B	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	0.86%	-1.52%	-0.68%	0.75%
1 Month Performance	-5.22%	6.61%	6.07%	3.46%
1 Year Performance	24.35%	45.18%	35.20%	23.07%

Hunting Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
HTG Hunting	4.3938 of 5 stars	GBX 408.50 -1.1%	GBX 512.50 +25.5%	+26.7%	£600.35M	£987.20M	16.61	2,341	News Coverage Insider Trade
CNEL China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L)	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£33.33M	N/A	N/A	79	Gap Down
PFC Petrofac	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£26.88M	£3.30B	N/A	8,600	Gap Up
TAND Tan Delta Systems	N/A	GBX 29 flat	N/A	N/A	£21.24M	£1.22M	N/A	11
PRES Pressure Technologies	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£12.88M	£32.78M	N/A	207

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:HTG) was last updated on 8/29/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Hunting (HTG) Competitors

HTG vs. CNEL, PFC, TAND, PRES, and POS

How does Hunting compare to China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L)?

Summary

How does Hunting compare to Petrofac?

Summary

How does Hunting compare to Tan Delta Systems?

Summary

How does Hunting compare to Pressure Technologies?

Summary

How does Hunting compare to Plexus?

Summary

Media Sentiment Over Time

HTG vs. The Competition

Hunting Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Hunting (HTG) Competitors

HTG vs. CNEL, PFC, TAND, PRES, and POS

How does Hunting compare to China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L)?

Do analysts rate HTG or CNEL?

Which has better valuation & earnings, HTG or CNEL?

Does the media refer more to HTG or CNEL?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in HTG or CNEL?

Is HTG or CNEL more profitable?

Summary

How does Hunting compare to Petrofac?

Is HTG or PFC more profitable?

Do analysts prefer HTG or PFC?

Does the media refer more to HTG or PFC?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in HTG or PFC?

Which has more risk & volatility, HTG or PFC?

Is HTG or PFC a better dividend stock?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, HTG or PFC?

Summary

How does Hunting compare to Tan Delta Systems?

Is HTG or TAND more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in HTG or TAND?

Which has more risk & volatility, HTG or TAND?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, HTG or TAND?

Does the media favor HTG or TAND?

Do analysts prefer HTG or TAND?

Summary

How does Hunting compare to Pressure Technologies?

Do analysts recommend PRES or HTG?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, PRES or HTG?

Does the media refer more to PRES or HTG?

Is PRES or HTG a better dividend stock?

Which has more volatility and risk, PRES or HTG?

Is PRES or HTG more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in PRES or HTG?

Summary

How does Hunting compare to Plexus?

Do analysts recommend HTG or POS?

Is HTG or POS more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in HTG or POS?

Does the media favor HTG or POS?

Which has more volatility and risk, HTG or POS?

Which has better valuation & earnings, HTG or POS?

Summary

Media Sentiment Over Time

HTG vs. The Competition

Hunting Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools