Free Trial
Your Rate Never Goes Up! Save $100 a Year on MarketBeat All Access
  • 0Days
  • 0Hours
  • 0Minutes
  • 0Seconds
Upgrade Now
Claim MarketBeat All Access Sale Promotion

Hunting (HTG) Competitors

Hunting logo
GBX 377.50 -48.00 (-11.28%)
As of 07:32 AM Eastern

HTG vs. CNEL, PFC, TAND, PRES, and GTC

Should you buy Hunting stock or one of its competitors? Hunting's main competitors and comparable companies include China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L) (CNEL), Petrofac (PFC), Tan Delta Systems (TAND), Pressure Technologies (PRES), and Getech Group (GTC). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "oil & gas equipment & services" industry.

How does Hunting compare to China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L)?

Hunting (LON:HTG) and China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L) (LON:CNEL) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Hunting has higher revenue and earnings than China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L). China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hunting, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hunting£987.20M0.55£154.42M£27.5013.73
China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L)N/AN/AN/A-£97.90N/A

Hunting has a net margin of 3.56% compared to China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L)'s net margin of 0.00%. Hunting's return on equity of 5.11% beat China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hunting3.56% 5.11% 4.21%
China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L) N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Hunting had 6 more articles in the media than China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L). MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Hunting and 0 mentions for China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L). China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L)'s average media sentiment score of 1.42 beat Hunting's score of 0.00 indicating that China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L) is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Hunting Neutral
China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L) Positive

61.4% of Hunting shares are held by institutional investors. 3.8% of Hunting shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Hunting presently has a consensus price target of GBX 512.50, suggesting a potential upside of 35.76%. Given Hunting's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Hunting is more favorable than China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L).

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hunting
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75
China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L)
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Hunting beats China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L) on 12 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hunting compare to Petrofac?

Petrofac (LON:PFC) and Hunting (LON:HTG) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and risk.

Petrofac has a beta of 0.97, meaning that its share price is 3% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hunting has a beta of 0.688, meaning that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

Hunting has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Petrofac. Petrofac is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hunting, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Petrofac£3.30B0.00-£714.53M-£81.55N/A
Hunting£987.20M0.55£154.42M£27.5013.73

Hunting has a consensus price target of GBX 512.50, suggesting a potential upside of 35.76%. Given Hunting's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Hunting is more favorable than Petrofac.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Petrofac
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Hunting
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75

Hunting has a net margin of 3.56% compared to Petrofac's net margin of -20.23%. Petrofac's return on equity of 371.32% beat Hunting's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Petrofac-20.23% 371.32% -9.55%
Hunting 3.56%5.11%4.21%

In the previous week, Hunting had 6 more articles in the media than Petrofac. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Hunting and 0 mentions for Petrofac. Petrofac's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Hunting'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Petrofac Neutral
Hunting Neutral

27.4% of Petrofac shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.4% of Hunting shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.5% of Petrofac shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.8% of Hunting shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Petrofac pays an annual dividend of GBX 30 per share. Hunting pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Petrofac pays out -36.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hunting pays out 47.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Hunting beats Petrofac on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hunting compare to Tan Delta Systems?

Hunting (LON:HTG) and Tan Delta Systems (LON:TAND) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and risk.

Hunting presently has a consensus price target of GBX 512.50, suggesting a potential upside of 35.76%. Given Hunting's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Hunting is more favorable than Tan Delta Systems.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hunting
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75
Tan Delta Systems
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Hunting has a beta of 0.688, meaning that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tan Delta Systems has a beta of 0.635, meaning that its share price is 37% less volatile than the broader market.

Hunting has a net margin of 3.56% compared to Tan Delta Systems' net margin of -105.50%. Hunting's return on equity of 5.11% beat Tan Delta Systems' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hunting3.56% 5.11% 4.21%
Tan Delta Systems -105.50%-81.88%N/A

In the previous week, Hunting had 6 more articles in the media than Tan Delta Systems. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Hunting and 0 mentions for Tan Delta Systems. Hunting's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Tan Delta Systems'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Hunting Neutral
Tan Delta Systems Neutral

61.4% of Hunting shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.6% of Tan Delta Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.8% of Hunting shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 19.4% of Tan Delta Systems shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Hunting has higher revenue and earnings than Tan Delta Systems. Tan Delta Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hunting, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hunting£987.20M0.55£154.42M£27.5013.73
Tan Delta Systems£1.46M10.03-£1.33M-£2.00N/A

Summary

Hunting beats Tan Delta Systems on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hunting compare to Pressure Technologies?

Pressure Technologies (LON:PRES) and Hunting (LON:HTG) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and dividends.

Hunting has a consensus price target of GBX 512.50, suggesting a potential upside of 35.76%. Given Hunting's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Hunting is more favorable than Pressure Technologies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pressure Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Hunting
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75

65.9% of Pressure Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.4% of Hunting shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.4% of Pressure Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.8% of Hunting shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Hunting has higher revenue and earnings than Pressure Technologies. Pressure Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hunting, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pressure Technologies£32.78M0.00-£500.34K-£1.35N/A
Hunting£987.20M0.55£154.42M£27.5013.73

Hunting has a net margin of 3.56% compared to Pressure Technologies' net margin of -16.44%. Hunting's return on equity of 5.11% beat Pressure Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pressure Technologies-16.44% -19.70% 0.88%
Hunting 3.56%5.11%4.21%

Pressure Technologies pays an annual dividend of GBX 8 per share. Hunting pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Pressure Technologies pays out -593.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hunting pays out 47.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Hunting had 5 more articles in the media than Pressure Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Hunting and 1 mentions for Pressure Technologies. Hunting's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Pressure Technologies' score of -0.10 indicating that Hunting is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Pressure Technologies
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Hunting
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Pressure Technologies has a beta of 1.58, suggesting that its stock price is 58% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hunting has a beta of 0.688, suggesting that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Hunting beats Pressure Technologies on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hunting compare to Getech Group?

Hunting (LON:HTG) and Getech Group (LON:GTC) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, earnings, valuation, dividends and analyst recommendations.

61.4% of Hunting shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.4% of Getech Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.8% of Hunting shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 11.0% of Getech Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Hunting currently has a consensus price target of GBX 512.50, indicating a potential upside of 35.76%. Given Hunting's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Hunting is more favorable than Getech Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hunting
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75
Getech Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Hunting has a net margin of 3.56% compared to Getech Group's net margin of -0.45%. Hunting's return on equity of 5.11% beat Getech Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hunting3.56% 5.11% 4.21%
Getech Group -0.45%-0.65%-12.19%

In the previous week, Hunting had 5 more articles in the media than Getech Group. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Hunting and 1 mentions for Getech Group. Getech Group's average media sentiment score of 0.45 beat Hunting's score of 0.00 indicating that Getech Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Hunting
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Getech Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Hunting has higher revenue and earnings than Getech Group. Getech Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hunting, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hunting£987.20M0.55£154.42M£27.5013.73
Getech Group£5.32M1.21-£7.27M-£0.02N/A

Hunting has a beta of 0.688, suggesting that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Getech Group has a beta of 0.674, suggesting that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Hunting beats Getech Group on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Hunting News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for HTG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

HTG vs. The Competition

MetricHuntingEnergy Equipment & Services IndustryEnergy SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£547.31M£1.30B£8.22B£2.78B
Dividend Yield2.61%6.90%6.08%5.12%
P/E Ratio13.7331.1425.2923.25
Price / Sales0.551.994.385.01
Price / Cash5.5624.2527.2520.23
Price / Book0.661.842.512.45
Net Income£154.42M-£104.77M£7.93B£5.88B
7 Day Performance-7.81%1.43%0.76%-0.43%
1 Month Performance-4.43%1.76%0.80%-1.55%
1 Year Performance8.95%35.46%32.72%6.90%

Hunting Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
HTG
Hunting
4.2243 of 5 stars
GBX 377.50
-11.3%
GBX 512.50
+35.8%
+23.3%£547.31M£987.20M13.732,341
CNEL
China New Energy Limited (CNEL.L)
N/AN/AN/AN/A£33.33MN/AN/A79
PFC
Petrofac
N/AN/AN/AN/A£26.88M£3.30BN/A8,600
TAND
Tan Delta Systems
N/AGBX 22.50
flat
N/A-20.0%£16.48M£1.46MN/A11
PRES
Pressure Technologies
N/AN/AN/AN/A£12.88M£32.78MN/A207

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:HTG) was last updated on 10/28/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners