Facilities by ADF (ADF) Competitors

GBX 12.99 +0.24 (+1.91%)
As of 06:19 AM Eastern

ADF vs. G4M, SDG, VCP, WJG, and CCT

Should you buy Facilities by ADF stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Facilities by ADF with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Facilities by ADF include Gear4music (G4M), Sanderson Design Group (SDG), Victoria (VCP), Watkin Jones (WJG), and The Character Group (CCT). These companies are all part of the "consumer cyclical" sector.

How does Facilities by ADF compare to Gear4music?

Facilities by ADF (LON:ADF) and Gear4music (LON:G4M) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability and dividends.

Facilities by ADF has a beta of 0.897, meaning that its share price is 10% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gear4music has a beta of 0.995, meaning that its share price is 1% less volatile than the broader market.

Gear4music has a net margin of 2.46% compared to Facilities by ADF's net margin of 0.00%. Gear4music's return on equity of 10.10% beat Facilities by ADF's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Facilities by ADFN/A N/A -1.31%
Gear4music 2.46%10.10%2.15%

Gear4music has higher revenue and earnings than Facilities by ADF. Gear4music is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Facilities by ADF, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Facilities by ADF£41.30M0.34-£3.25M£0.011,299.30
Gear4music£165.73M0.35£988.88K£18.8014.57

In the previous week, Gear4music had 1 more articles in the media than Facilities by ADF. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Gear4music and 1 mentions for Facilities by ADF. Gear4music's average media sentiment score of 1.52 beat Facilities by ADF's score of 0.00 indicating that Gear4music is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Facilities by ADF
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Gear4music
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

6.8% of Facilities by ADF shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.5% of Gear4music shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.0% of Facilities by ADF shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 28.6% of Gear4music shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Gear4music beats Facilities by ADF on 12 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Facilities by ADF compare to Sanderson Design Group?

Facilities by ADF (LON:ADF) and Sanderson Design Group (LON:SDG) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and dividends.

Sanderson Design Group has higher revenue and earnings than Facilities by ADF. Sanderson Design Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Facilities by ADF, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Facilities by ADF£41.30M0.34-£3.25M£0.011,299.30
Sanderson Design Group£99.48M0.54£4.43M£2.8726.13

Facilities by ADF has a beta of 0.897, indicating that its share price is 10% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sanderson Design Group has a beta of 0.585, indicating that its share price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

Facilities by ADF pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.9%. Sanderson Design Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Facilities by ADF pays out 9,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Sanderson Design Group pays out 52.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

6.8% of Facilities by ADF shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.5% of Sanderson Design Group shares are held by institutional investors. 4.0% of Facilities by ADF shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 9.2% of Sanderson Design Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Facilities by ADF had 1 more articles in the media than Sanderson Design Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Facilities by ADF and 0 mentions for Sanderson Design Group. Facilities by ADF's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Sanderson Design Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Facilities by ADF Neutral
Sanderson Design Group Neutral

Sanderson Design Group has a net margin of 2.16% compared to Facilities by ADF's net margin of 0.00%. Sanderson Design Group's return on equity of 3.09% beat Facilities by ADF's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Facilities by ADFN/A N/A -1.31%
Sanderson Design Group 2.16%3.09%5.54%

Summary

Sanderson Design Group beats Facilities by ADF on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Facilities by ADF compare to Victoria?

Facilities by ADF (LON:ADF) and Victoria (LON:VCP) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Facilities by ADF had 1 more articles in the media than Victoria. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Facilities by ADF and 0 mentions for Victoria. Facilities by ADF's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Victoria'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Facilities by ADF Neutral
Victoria Neutral

Facilities by ADF has a beta of 0.897, indicating that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Victoria has a beta of 0.457, indicating that its stock price is 54% less volatile than the broader market.

6.8% of Facilities by ADF shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.2% of Victoria shares are held by institutional investors. 4.0% of Facilities by ADF shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 40.9% of Victoria shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Victoria has a consensus target price of GBX 170, suggesting a potential upside of 246.94%. Given Victoria's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Victoria is more favorable than Facilities by ADF.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Facilities by ADF
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Victoria
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Facilities by ADF has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Victoria. Victoria is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Facilities by ADF, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Facilities by ADF£41.30M0.34-£3.25M£0.011,299.30
Victoria£1.08B0.05-£107.43M£2.78 thousand0.02

Facilities by ADF has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Victoria's net margin of -21.45%. Victoria's return on equity of 67.51% beat Facilities by ADF's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Facilities by ADFN/A N/A -1.31%
Victoria -21.45%67.51%1.75%

Summary

Victoria beats Facilities by ADF on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Facilities by ADF compare to Watkin Jones?

Watkin Jones (LON:WJG) and Facilities by ADF (LON:ADF) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, dividends, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk and institutional ownership.

Facilities by ADF has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Watkin Jones. Watkin Jones is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Facilities by ADF, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Watkin Jones£250.83M0.19-£30.76M-£3.35N/A
Facilities by ADF£41.30M0.34-£3.25M£0.011,299.30

In the previous week, Watkin Jones and Watkin Jones both had 1 articles in the media. Watkin Jones' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Facilities by ADF's score of 0.00 indicating that Watkin Jones is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Watkin Jones
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Facilities by ADF
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

22.8% of Watkin Jones shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.8% of Facilities by ADF shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.9% of Watkin Jones shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.0% of Facilities by ADF shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Facilities by ADF has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Watkin Jones' net margin of -3.43%. Facilities by ADF's return on equity of 0.00% beat Watkin Jones' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Watkin Jones-3.43% -6.89% -5.63%
Facilities by ADF N/A N/A -1.31%

Watkin Jones presently has a consensus price target of GBX 38, indicating a potential upside of 105.41%. Given Watkin Jones' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Watkin Jones is more favorable than Facilities by ADF.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Watkin Jones
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Facilities by ADF
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Watkin Jones has a beta of 1.37, indicating that its share price is 37% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Facilities by ADF has a beta of 0.897, indicating that its share price is 10% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Facilities by ADF beats Watkin Jones on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Facilities by ADF compare to The Character Group?

The Character Group (LON:CCT) and Facilities by ADF (LON:ADF) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

Facilities by ADF has a net margin of 0.00% compared to The Character Group's net margin of -1.82%. Facilities by ADF's return on equity of 0.00% beat The Character Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
The Character Group-1.82% -5.25% 7.61%
Facilities by ADF N/A N/A -1.31%

1.1% of The Character Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.8% of Facilities by ADF shares are held by institutional investors. 23.9% of The Character Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.0% of Facilities by ADF shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

The Character Group has a beta of 0.181, indicating that its stock price is 82% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Facilities by ADF has a beta of 0.897, indicating that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, The Character Group had 1 more articles in the media than Facilities by ADF. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for The Character Group and 1 mentions for Facilities by ADF. The Character Group's average media sentiment score of 1.28 beat Facilities by ADF's score of 0.00 indicating that The Character Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
The Character Group
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Facilities by ADF
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

The Character Group has higher revenue and earnings than Facilities by ADF. The Character Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Facilities by ADF, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The Character Group£95.73M0.52£5.22M-£8.90N/A
Facilities by ADF£41.30M0.34-£3.25M£0.011,299.30

The Character Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 6 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Facilities by ADF pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.9%. The Character Group pays out -67.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Facilities by ADF pays out 9,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Summary

The Character Group beats Facilities by ADF on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Facilities by ADF News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ADF and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ADF and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

ADF vs. The Competition

MetricFacilities by ADFRecreational Vehicles IndustryCyclical SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£14.01M£3.14B£3.86B£2.78B
Dividend Yield9.41%5.30%3.50%6.16%
P/E Ratio1,299.30220.4278.30365.72
Price / Sales0.3417.31307.3386,253.69
Price / CashN/A137.6030.8127.85
Price / Book0.444.653.337.92
Net Income-£3.25M£96.40M£249.12M£5.89B
7 Day Performance8.28%2.16%-0.79%-0.87%
1 Month Performance-3.76%1.71%0.01%-0.76%
1 Year Performance-13.38%6.71%-0.02%70.67%

Facilities by ADF Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
ADF
Facilities by ADF
N/AGBX 12.99
+1.9%
N/A-13.7%£14.01M£41.30M1,299.30203
G4M
Gear4music
N/AGBX 265
+2.9%
N/A+37.4%£55.59M£165.73M14.10484
SDG
Sanderson Design Group
N/AGBX 74.50
flat
N/A+60.4%£53.84M£99.48M25.96600
VCP
Victoria
N/AGBX 45.32
-1.5%
GBX 170
+275.1%
-32.7%£52.28M£1.08B0.026,750
WJG
Watkin Jones
2.1695 of 5 stars
GBX 19.06
+2.9%
GBX 38
+99.4%
-34.8%£48.96M£250.83MN/A727

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:ADF) was last updated on 6/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners