Free Trial
→ You're not getting into the SpaceX IPO. Do this instead. (From Behind the Markets) (Ad)tc pixel Free ADF Stock Alerts

Facilities by ADF (ADF) Competitors

GBX 13 +0.50 (+4.00%)
As of 12:14 PM Eastern
Compare

ADF vs. IGR, MRK, G4M, ESC, and SDG

Should you buy Facilities by ADF stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Facilities by ADF with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Facilities by ADF include IG Design Group (IGR), Marks Electrical Group (MRK), Gear4music (G4M), Escape Hunt (ESC), and Sanderson Design Group (SDG). These companies are all part of the "consumer cyclical" sector.

How does Facilities by ADF compare to IG Design Group?

Facilities by ADF (LON:ADF) and IG Design Group (LON:IGR) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations and profitability.

6.8% of Facilities by ADF shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 21.5% of IG Design Group shares are held by institutional investors. 3.8% of Facilities by ADF shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of IG Design Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Facilities by ADF had 4 more articles in the media than IG Design Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Facilities by ADF and 0 mentions for IG Design Group. Facilities by ADF's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled IG Design Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Facilities by ADF Neutral
IG Design Group Neutral

IG Design Group has higher revenue and earnings than Facilities by ADF. IG Design Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Facilities by ADF, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Facilities by ADF£41.30M0.34-£3.25M£0.011,300.00
IG Design Group£709.36M0.10£29.18M-£262.40N/A

IG Design Group has a consensus price target of GBX 150, suggesting a potential upside of 107.18%. Given IG Design Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe IG Design Group is more favorable than Facilities by ADF.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Facilities by ADF
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
IG Design Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Facilities by ADF has a net margin of 0.00% compared to IG Design Group's net margin of -23.77%. Facilities by ADF's return on equity of 0.00% beat IG Design Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Facilities by ADFN/A N/A -1.31%
IG Design Group -23.77%-43.73%2.85%

Facilities by ADF has a beta of 1.3163596, indicating that its share price is 32% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, IG Design Group has a beta of 0.703, indicating that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Facilities by ADF beats IG Design Group on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Facilities by ADF compare to Marks Electrical Group?

Facilities by ADF (LON:ADF) and Marks Electrical Group (LON:MRK) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Marks Electrical Group has a consensus price target of GBX 52.50, indicating a potential upside of 8.14%. Given Marks Electrical Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Marks Electrical Group is more favorable than Facilities by ADF.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Facilities by ADF
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Marks Electrical Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Facilities by ADF has a beta of 1.3163596, suggesting that its stock price is 32% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Marks Electrical Group has a beta of 0.673, suggesting that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market.

6.8% of Facilities by ADF shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.2% of Marks Electrical Group shares are held by institutional investors. 3.8% of Facilities by ADF shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 75.2% of Marks Electrical Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Facilities by ADF has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Marks Electrical Group's net margin of -0.97%. Facilities by ADF's return on equity of 0.00% beat Marks Electrical Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Facilities by ADFN/A N/A -1.31%
Marks Electrical Group -0.97%-10.09%0.91%

In the previous week, Facilities by ADF had 4 more articles in the media than Marks Electrical Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Facilities by ADF and 0 mentions for Marks Electrical Group. Facilities by ADF's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Marks Electrical Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Facilities by ADF Neutral
Marks Electrical Group Neutral

Marks Electrical Group has higher revenue and earnings than Facilities by ADF. Marks Electrical Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Facilities by ADF, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Facilities by ADF£41.30M0.34-£3.25M£0.011,300.00
Marks Electrical Group£111.35M0.45£426.93K-£1.03N/A

Facilities by ADF pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.9%. Marks Electrical Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Facilities by ADF pays out 9,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Marks Electrical Group pays out -93.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Summary

Marks Electrical Group beats Facilities by ADF on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Facilities by ADF compare to Gear4music?

Facilities by ADF (LON:ADF) and Gear4music (LON:G4M) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, valuation, earnings and dividends.

Facilities by ADF has a beta of 1.3163596, meaning that its share price is 32% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gear4music has a beta of 0.995, meaning that its share price is 1% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Facilities by ADF had 4 more articles in the media than Gear4music. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Facilities by ADF and 0 mentions for Gear4music. Facilities by ADF's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Gear4music'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Facilities by ADF Neutral
Gear4music Neutral

Gear4music has a net margin of 2.46% compared to Facilities by ADF's net margin of 0.00%. Gear4music's return on equity of 10.10% beat Facilities by ADF's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Facilities by ADFN/A N/A -1.31%
Gear4music 2.46%10.10%2.15%

6.8% of Facilities by ADF shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.5% of Gear4music shares are held by institutional investors. 3.8% of Facilities by ADF shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 28.6% of Gear4music shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Gear4music has higher revenue and earnings than Facilities by ADF. Gear4music is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Facilities by ADF, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Facilities by ADF£41.30M0.34-£3.25M£0.011,300.00
Gear4music£165.73M0.31£988.88K£18.8012.82

Summary

Gear4music beats Facilities by ADF on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Facilities by ADF compare to Escape Hunt?

Facilities by ADF (LON:ADF) and Escape Hunt (LON:ESC) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Facilities by ADF had 4 more articles in the media than Escape Hunt. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Facilities by ADF and 0 mentions for Escape Hunt. Facilities by ADF's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Escape Hunt'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Facilities by ADF Neutral
Escape Hunt Neutral

6.8% of Facilities by ADF shares are held by institutional investors. 3.8% of Facilities by ADF shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Escape Hunt has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Facilities by ADF. Escape Hunt is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Facilities by ADF, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Facilities by ADF£41.30M0.34-£3.25M£0.011,300.00
Escape Hunt£2.53M0.00N/A-£7.10N/A

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Facilities by ADFN/A N/A -1.31%
Escape Hunt N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Facilities by ADF beats Escape Hunt on 6 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Facilities by ADF compare to Sanderson Design Group?

Sanderson Design Group (LON:SDG) and Facilities by ADF (LON:ADF) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Sanderson Design Group has a net margin of 2.16% compared to Facilities by ADF's net margin of 0.00%. Sanderson Design Group's return on equity of 3.09% beat Facilities by ADF's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sanderson Design Group2.16% 3.09% 5.54%
Facilities by ADF N/A N/A -1.31%

16.5% of Sanderson Design Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.8% of Facilities by ADF shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.3% of Sanderson Design Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.8% of Facilities by ADF shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Sanderson Design Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Facilities by ADF pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.9%. Sanderson Design Group pays out 52.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Facilities by ADF pays out 9,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

In the previous week, Facilities by ADF had 4 more articles in the media than Sanderson Design Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Facilities by ADF and 0 mentions for Sanderson Design Group. Sanderson Design Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Facilities by ADF'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Sanderson Design Group Neutral
Facilities by ADF Neutral

Sanderson Design Group has higher revenue and earnings than Facilities by ADF. Sanderson Design Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Facilities by ADF, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sanderson Design Group£99.48M0.47£4.43M£2.8722.47
Facilities by ADF£41.30M0.34-£3.25M£0.011,300.00

Sanderson Design Group has a beta of 0.581, indicating that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Facilities by ADF has a beta of 1.3163596, indicating that its stock price is 32% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Sanderson Design Group beats Facilities by ADF on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Facilities by ADF News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ADF and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

ADF vs. The Competition

Export
MetricFacilities by ADFRecreational Vehicles IndustryCyclical SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£14.02M£2.85B£3.98B£2.79B
Dividend Yield9.80%5.48%3.59%6.09%
P/E Ratio1,300.00219.9277.09366.15
Price / Sales0.3417.31311.8288,429.84
Price / CashN/A137.6030.8627.89
Price / Book0.444.853.177.74
Net Income-£3.25M£96.40M£247.47M£5.89B
7 Day Performance6.56%1.57%1.11%0.82%
1 Month Performance14.64%-2.80%1.36%2.78%
1 Year Performance-9.09%21.86%1.48%87.90%

Facilities by ADF Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
ADF
Facilities by ADF
N/AGBX 13
+4.0%		N/A-12.1%£14.02M£41.30M1,300.00203
IGR
IG Design Group
1.9932 of 5 stars		GBX 54.50
flat		GBX 150
+175.2%		+23.3%£51.94M£709.36MN/A3,092
MRK
Marks Electrical Group
0.7392 of 5 stars		GBX 48.65
flat		GBX 52.50
+7.9%		-16.7%£50.73M£111.35MN/A200
G4M
Gear4music
N/AGBX 240
flat		N/A+75.7%£50.35M£165.73M12.77484
ESC
Escape Hunt
N/AN/AN/AN/A£45.26M£2.53MN/A146

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:ADF) was last updated on 5/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
I’m sounding the alarm
Meta is cutting 10% of its workforce. Microsoft offered voluntary retirement to 7% of U.S. employees. Oracle, ...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Distracted Americans set to miss out on quadrillions
Technology expert and Washington D.C. insider Jeff Brown - who identified Bitcoin, Tesla, and Nvidia early - s...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
The system holding the dollar together is gone…
Saudi Arabia has terminated its 1974 petrodollar agreement with the United States - the deal that forced every...
Golden Portfolio | Sponsoredtc pixel
Musk's acquisition pattern points to ONE stock
Musk needed solar - he acquired SolarCity. Needed data - he bought Twitter. The pattern is clear: when a suppl...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran War Update: Trump’s Hand-Written Letter Reveals What Comes Next
Jim Rickards has uncovered what he believes is Trump's economic plan, with a key trigger date of May 15. The F...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
This is the worst news for stocks in 50 years
Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are issuing a rare warning: what's ahead for U.S. stocks could be the worst e...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
Satellite Images Spot Potential $10 Trillion Discovery
'Dark Energy': Elon Musk's Next Potential $10 Trillion Move A highly secure site in West Texas now houses a...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel