Go Pro
→ From the man who predicted 2008 crash… (From Porter & Company) (Ad)tc pixel Free ADF Stock Alerts

Facilities by ADF (ADF) Competitors

GBX 13.38 -0.12 (-0.88%)
As of 07/13/2026 09:56 AM Eastern
Compare

ADF vs. G4M, SDG, CCT, WJG, and MRK

Should you buy Facilities by ADF stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Facilities by ADF with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Facilities by ADF include Gear4music (G4M), Sanderson Design Group (SDG), The Character Group (CCT), Watkin Jones (WJG), and Marks Electrical Group (MRK). These companies are all part of the "consumer cyclical" sector.

How does Facilities by ADF compare to Gear4music?

Facilities by ADF (LON:ADF) and Gear4music (LON:G4M) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, earnings and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Facilities by ADF's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Gear4music'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Facilities by ADF Neutral
Gear4music Neutral

Gear4music has a net margin of 3.84% compared to Facilities by ADF's net margin of 0.00%. Gear4music's return on equity of 16.69% beat Facilities by ADF's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Facilities by ADFN/A N/A -1.31%
Gear4music 3.84%16.69%2.15%

Gear4music has higher revenue and earnings than Facilities by ADF. Gear4music is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Facilities by ADF, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Facilities by ADF£41.30M0.35-£3.25M£0.011,338.10
Gear4music£190.74M0.30£988.88K£34.907.83

Facilities by ADF has a beta of 0.897, indicating that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gear4music has a beta of 1.008, indicating that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market.

6.8% of Facilities by ADF shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.4% of Gear4music shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.0% of Facilities by ADF shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 28.7% of Gear4music shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Gear4music beats Facilities by ADF on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Facilities by ADF compare to Sanderson Design Group?

Sanderson Design Group (LON:SDG) and Facilities by ADF (LON:ADF) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, dividends, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

16.5% of Sanderson Design Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.8% of Facilities by ADF shares are held by institutional investors. 8.4% of Sanderson Design Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.0% of Facilities by ADF shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Sanderson Design Group has a net margin of 2.16% compared to Facilities by ADF's net margin of 0.00%. Sanderson Design Group's return on equity of 3.09% beat Facilities by ADF's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sanderson Design Group2.16% 3.09% 5.54%
Facilities by ADF N/A N/A -1.31%

Sanderson Design Group has higher revenue and earnings than Facilities by ADF. Sanderson Design Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Facilities by ADF, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sanderson Design Group£99.48M0.54£4.43M£2.8726.04
Facilities by ADF£41.30M0.35-£3.25M£0.011,338.10

Sanderson Design Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Facilities by ADF pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.7%. Sanderson Design Group pays out 52.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Facilities by ADF pays out 9,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Sanderson Design Group has a beta of 0.582, suggesting that its share price is 42% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Facilities by ADF has a beta of 0.897, suggesting that its share price is 10% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Sanderson Design Group had 3 more articles in the media than Facilities by ADF. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Sanderson Design Group and 0 mentions for Facilities by ADF. Sanderson Design Group's average media sentiment score of 1.88 beat Facilities by ADF's score of 0.00 indicating that Sanderson Design Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Sanderson Design Group Very Positive
Facilities by ADF Neutral

Summary

Sanderson Design Group beats Facilities by ADF on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Facilities by ADF compare to The Character Group?

The Character Group (LON:CCT) and Facilities by ADF (LON:ADF) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, profitability and earnings.

The Character Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 6 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Facilities by ADF pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.7%. The Character Group pays out -67.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Facilities by ADF pays out 9,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

In the previous week, The Character Group had 2 more articles in the media than Facilities by ADF. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for The Character Group and 0 mentions for Facilities by ADF. The Character Group's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Facilities by ADF's score of 0.00 indicating that The Character Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
The Character Group Positive
Facilities by ADF Neutral

The Character Group has a beta of 0.192, meaning that its stock price is 81% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Facilities by ADF has a beta of 0.897, meaning that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the broader market.

1.1% of The Character Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.8% of Facilities by ADF shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.9% of The Character Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.0% of Facilities by ADF shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Facilities by ADF has a net margin of 0.00% compared to The Character Group's net margin of -1.82%. Facilities by ADF's return on equity of 0.00% beat The Character Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
The Character Group-1.82% -5.25% 7.61%
Facilities by ADF N/A N/A -1.31%

The Character Group has higher revenue and earnings than Facilities by ADF. The Character Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Facilities by ADF, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The Character Group£95.73M0.53£5.22M-£8.90N/A
Facilities by ADF£41.30M0.35-£3.25M£0.011,338.10

Summary

The Character Group beats Facilities by ADF on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Facilities by ADF compare to Watkin Jones?

Watkin Jones (LON:WJG) and Facilities by ADF (LON:ADF) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and risk.

22.8% of Watkin Jones shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.8% of Facilities by ADF shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.9% of Watkin Jones shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.0% of Facilities by ADF shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Watkin Jones had 1 more articles in the media than Facilities by ADF. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Watkin Jones and 0 mentions for Facilities by ADF. Watkin Jones' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Facilities by ADF'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Watkin Jones Neutral
Facilities by ADF Neutral

Watkin Jones has a beta of 1.378, suggesting that its stock price is 38% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Facilities by ADF has a beta of 0.897, suggesting that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the broader market.

Facilities by ADF has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Watkin Jones. Watkin Jones is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Facilities by ADF, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Watkin Jones£250.83M0.20-£30.76M-£3.35N/A
Facilities by ADF£41.30M0.35-£3.25M£0.011,338.10

Facilities by ADF has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Watkin Jones' net margin of -3.43%. Facilities by ADF's return on equity of 0.00% beat Watkin Jones' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Watkin Jones-3.43% -6.89% -5.63%
Facilities by ADF N/A N/A -1.31%

Watkin Jones presently has a consensus target price of GBX 38, indicating a potential upside of 96.76%. Given Watkin Jones' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Watkin Jones is more favorable than Facilities by ADF.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Watkin Jones
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Facilities by ADF
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Facilities by ADF beats Watkin Jones on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Facilities by ADF compare to Marks Electrical Group?

Marks Electrical Group (LON:MRK) and Facilities by ADF (LON:ADF) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends and earnings.

Marks Electrical Group has higher revenue and earnings than Facilities by ADF. Marks Electrical Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Facilities by ADF, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Marks Electrical Group£107.93M0.43£426.93K-£0.40N/A
Facilities by ADF£41.30M0.35-£3.25M£0.011,338.10

Marks Electrical Group has a beta of 0.576, indicating that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Facilities by ADF has a beta of 0.897, indicating that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the broader market.

0.2% of Marks Electrical Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.8% of Facilities by ADF shares are owned by institutional investors. 75.4% of Marks Electrical Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.0% of Facilities by ADF shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Marks Electrical Group presently has a consensus target price of GBX 52.50, indicating a potential upside of 16.54%. Given Marks Electrical Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Marks Electrical Group is more favorable than Facilities by ADF.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Marks Electrical Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Facilities by ADF
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Marks Electrical Group had 1 more articles in the media than Facilities by ADF. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Marks Electrical Group and 0 mentions for Facilities by ADF. Marks Electrical Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Facilities by ADF'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Marks Electrical Group Neutral
Facilities by ADF Neutral

Marks Electrical Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.66 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Facilities by ADF pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.7%. Marks Electrical Group pays out -165.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Facilities by ADF pays out 9,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Facilities by ADF has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Marks Electrical Group's net margin of -0.39%. Facilities by ADF's return on equity of 0.00% beat Marks Electrical Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Marks Electrical Group-0.39% -4.18% 0.91%
Facilities by ADF N/A N/A -1.31%

Summary

Marks Electrical Group beats Facilities by ADF on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Facilities by ADF News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ADF and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ADF and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

ADF vs. The Competition

Export
MetricFacilities by ADFRecreational Vehicles IndustryCyclical SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£14.43M£3.08B£3.87B£2.77B
Dividend Yield8.89%5.05%3.49%6.16%
P/E Ratio1,338.10226.8277.30368.13
Price / Sales0.3517.81318.7284,621.88
Price / CashN/A137.6030.8227.87
Price / Book0.464.573.527.51
Net Income-£3.25M£96.40M£249.12M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-0.70%-0.32%0.22%-0.27%
1 Month Performance2.93%0.64%5.70%-1.09%
1 Year Performance-39.18%-1.41%3.49%61.67%

Facilities by ADF Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
ADF
Facilities by ADF
N/AGBX 13.38
-0.9%		N/A-41.8%£14.43M£41.30M1,338.10203
G4M
Gear4music
N/AGBX 281
+4.1%		N/A+23.2%£58.95M£190.74M8.05484
SDG
Sanderson Design Group
N/AGBX 76
flat		N/A+48.0%£54.92M£99.48M26.48600
CCT
The Character Group
N/AGBX 289.10
-0.3%		N/A+10.0%£50.36M£95.73MN/A1,540
WJG
Watkin Jones
2.0029 of 5 stars		GBX 19
flat		GBX 38
+100.0%		-30.8%£48.81M£250.83MN/A727

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:ADF) was last updated on 7/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
SPCX Warning - and Worst News for Stocks in 50 Years
Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are now predicting what could be the worst news for the U.S. stock market in ...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump’s $250 Bill – See Immediately
Former Goldman Sachs VP Dr. David Eifrig is warning that July 28 could trigger the biggest wealth reset in mod...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
They told you not to miss this one
The largest companies in the SP 500 are now more overvalued relative to fundamentals than they were at the abs...
Thor Metals | Sponsoredtc pixel
Forget SpaceX, this is Elon’s Next Breakthrough
Jeff Brown and Marc Chaikin - two investors who called Nvidia a decade ago - say Elon Musk's newly filed AI pa...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
When I found Rolls-Royce under $2, most people thought I was crazy
In 2022, Karim Rahemtulla recommended Rolls-Royce when it traded under $2. The stock climbed more than 1,100% ...
Monument Traders Alliance | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book attached
Bill Poulos is giving away his 'Safe Trade Options Formula' book for free - but only for a limited time throug...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel